Anzeige
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Anzeige
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Anzeige
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Anzeige
Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth
Nächste SlideShare
Operations Power PerformanceOperations Power Performance
Wird geladen in ... 3
1 von 15
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Presentaciones para ti(20)

Similar a Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth (20)

Anzeige

Smart SMBs: fine-tuning the engines of growth

  1. 1© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth To achieve growth, economies the world over rely on small businesses to create jobs, increase competition and spur innovation. In return, these small businesses often look to governments for assistance, from cutting bureaucratic red tape to providing financial incentives such as tax breaks. Yet this growth model is stuck in second gear. In the latest forecasts from The Economist Intelligence Unit, global GDP growth for 2013 has been revised down to 3.1% - only slightly up on GDP growth for 2012 (2.9%). Meanwhile, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) from around the world find regulation to be a top business concern, on a par with shortages of financing and behind only the weak economy, according to a survey conducted by the EIU for this paper. With growth prospects and regulation unlikely to improve overnight, smart SMBs are targeting the improvements they can make to their own businesses. Key Findings To assess how SMBs are focusing on growth through smarter internal operations, The Economist Intelligence Unit surveyed owners and senior managers of these businesses from across the globe*. The main findings to emerge from the research are as follows:  Smarter internal operations are key to growth New businesses have a high chance of failure within the first five years, so revenue growth is understandably of utmost importance to the owners and senior managers of SMBs. Next to revenue growth, the strategic focus of SMBs is now firmly on improvements in operating efficiency and attracting and retaining talent. Optimising existing company operations in this way is seen as a higher priority than other strategic objectives like entering new markets or developing new products. Top five strategic objectives for SMBs over next 12 months (% of respondents scoring it 4 or 5 on scale of 1 to 5, 5 being highest priority) Full width Revenue growth Improve operating efficiency Attracting and retaining talent Developing new products or services Entering new markets or distribution channels Chart 1 40% 49% 53% 78% 56% Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit. * The survey of 118 SMBs, each with no more than 250 employees, took place in February 2013. A full breakdown of the survey results and the demo- graphics is available in the appendix.
  2. 2 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth The majority of SMBs, moreover, have a complementary view of pursuing revenue growth and making improvements to the way the company operates. Over the next 12 months, expanding the business is likely to be the strongest reason for driving efficiency improvements, according to more than half (55%) of survey respondents, whereas only a quarter of respondents (24%) are motivated by reducing costs. Even fewer respondents are motivated by reducing complexity (12%) or by pressure on profit margins (5%). This striving for smarter growth is borne out in the concrete steps that SMBs are taking to improve internal operations. The top efficiency initiative, being undertaken by more than half (58%) of respondents to the survey, is training employees to work smarter. A similar number of SMBs in the survey (57%) are investing in IT upgrades to hardware or software. In contrast, only 14% of SMBs are reducing headcounts, working hours or expanding temporary workforces.  SMBs should embrace new technologies Technology is a crucial component of this smarter growth strategy. As SMBs invest in staff training and IT upgrades, the overwhelming majority are seeing the benefits of technology: over nine in ten (91%) of SMBs surveyed say they have benefited from tech-driven improvements to the business in the past 12 months. Looking ahead, the survey respondents pick out mobile working, cloud computing and “big data” (enhanced data collection and analysis) as the three technology developments likely to have the greatest impact on their business in the next 12 months. This should come as little surprise. These advances have enormous potential to help businesses be more efficient, by streamlining processes, enabling flexible working and reducing fixed capital costs. Exploiting mobile technologies to the full is critical for the majority of SMBs training employees to work more flexibly. Five tech-themed efficiency findings 9 in 10 SMBs have benefited from technology in last 12 months (mobile working and cloud computing expected to have biggest impact in next 12 months) 57% of SMBs have upgraded existing technology to improve efficiency, compared to 41% that have invested in new technology Lack of technology skills or know-how is deemed the second biggest barrier to efficiency improvements, only behind a resistance to change Internet speed and connectivity is less of an obstacle to efficiency improvements than restrictive regulation A minority of SMBs believe technology is too expensive and changes too fast Strongest drivers of efficiency improvements over next 12 months (% of respondents) Expanding the business Increasing profitability Raising employee productivity Reducing costs Improving competitiveness 15% 24% 24% 55% 33% Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit. Chart 2
  3. 3© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Meanwhile, cloud computing is particularly advantageous for start-ups and high-growth small firms, because these businesses have less capital than established companies to tie-up in expensive servers or office space, but a greater need for the flexibility to scale-up operations during periods of high growth. The potential that these technologies have to level the playing field between smaller and larger companies is reflected in the fact that only a third of respondents now see the cost of new technology as too steep. But despite these clear benefits and greater accessibility, many SMBs are still taking a cautious approach to new technology. For the time being, more companies are upgrading existing hardware or software than investing in new technology. Such caution ultimately comes down to resources. Smaller businesses do not have the IT capabilities of larger enterprises, and many start-ups are unlikely to have a dedicated IT specialist at all. The use of cloud-based services should help in this regard, for the reasons set out above. But owners and managers of SMBs also recognise the role that IT specialists have to play in small businesses: a lack of technology skills or know-how is rated the second biggest obstacle to improving operations.  Managers must take the lead on change Across the world, SMBs are keenly aware they need to make improvements to the way their businesses operate. An overwhelming 90% of respondents say their companies can do more to increase efficiency. In addition, over half are both unhappy with efficiency at their company and struggle to tackle inefficiencies. But aside from taking the focus off growth, there are few compelling reasons for not addressing these issues. For instance, only 15% of SMBs surveyed believe that all obvious improvements to the business have already been targeted. A similarly low number claim to be put off by the perceived high cost of efficiency measures. At the individual company level, what seems to be holding businesses back more than anything is a resistance to change. This is cited by SMBs as the top internal barrier to launching efficiency initiatives, ahead of the aforementioned IT skills gap and ahead of taking the focus of growth (as well as being on a par with the percentage of respondents citing the weak economy as their top external barrier to making these improvements – see chart 4). A sizeable proportion of senior managers are clearly aware of the leadership role they must play in overcoming this resistance to change. To succeed with initiatives aimed at improving the business, three quarters of these senior respondents believe it is vital to get their buy in. What is more, a lack of urgency or initiative from leadership is another highly ranked internal obstacle to improving the business. Still, there is some divergence of opinion among this leadership group. Business owners are much less likely to see resistance to change as an obstacle than other senior executives. This suggests Chart 3 Say their company can improve efficiency Believe efficiency is important but growth is a priority Are unhappy with their company's efficiency Offer financial incentives to employees to find efficiencies Reckon efficiency initiatives must be top-down to be successful Worry that competitors are improving efficiency faster than them Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit. How owners and senior managers view efficiency (% of respondents) 90% 77% 76% 52% 42% 29%
  4. 4 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth that some owners may be part of the problem – and not just the solution. Therefore, the first hurdle for some businesses may well be to convince the ultimate decision-makers of the need for them to sponsor organisational improvement.  New businesses should invest in smart growth early Given the focus on smarter growth, it is striking how few companies perceive there to be a competitive advantage to be gained from pursuing these organisational improvements. As it stands, less than a third of respondents (29%) are worried their competitors are improving efficiency faster than they are. In smaller businesses, with under $1m in assets, this concern is even slighter, with only 17% of respondents worried about the competitive advantage efficiency gives competitors. Yet such complacency can cause longer term damage to the business. Putting off efficiency improvements risks the problems becoming embedded in the business as it grows rapidly and reaches scale. The results of the survey clearly show that older companies, those with over 10 years in business, are more likely to struggle with their internal operations. Almost three in five (59%) of the SMBs falling into this group admit to having difficulty tackling inefficiencies compared with 46% of younger companies. Together with tackling inefficiencies, the older companies in the survey are more likely to have faced challenges to the bottom line: while most SMBs are profitable, four in five of those that have seen profits decline or become loss- making in the last 12 months have been in business for over 10 years. Operational inefficiency is likely to be one of many potential factors contributing to this decreased profitability, so this should provide management with added motivation to pursue smarter growth from the outset. Inside the company Chart 4 Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit. Top 5 barriers to improving company efficiency (% of respondents) Resistance to change Lack of technology skills/ know-how Lack of urgency/initiative from leadership Risk of detracting from growing business Weak culture of efficiency Outside the company Weak economy Lack of available financing Restrictive regulatory framework Shortage of talent Fixed costs of key inputs 22% 27% 31% 45% 32% 27% 27% 27% 44% 30%
  5. 5© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Conclusion The majority of SMBs in our survey are pursuing smarter growth, optimising working practices and investing in technology. Yet there remains an element of caution here, caused in part by a lack of technology know-how. This skills gap is important to address. Technology is widely identified as an important efficiency driver for SMBs in recent years, so companies should embrace newer developments like the cloud and mobile working, which they expect to have a big impact in the near future. Next year, the EIU forecasts global GDP growth to rise to around 4%, where it is expected to remain until at least 2017. As the global economy returns to stability and greater predictability, companies struggling with operational difficulties will find they have fewer excuses for disappointing results. To negate the threat of creeping inefficiency eating into profitability, the owners and managers of SMBs should tackle institutionalised resistance to change as well as their own complacency about what their competitors are doing around efficiency. New businesses with absolute focus on revenue growth should take heed of these lessons and build efficiency into their businesses from the very start.  Smarter internal operations are key to growth  SMBs should embrace technology  Managers must take the lead on change  New businesses should invest in smart growth early Key findings
  6. 6 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth The Economist Intelligence Unit surveyed 118 owners and senior executives of SMBs from North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific. The survey took place in February 2013 and our thanks go to all those who took part. For the purposes of the survey, we defined efficiency to mean conducting operations, processes or tasks with minimum time, cost, wastage or effort. Please note that not all answers add up to 100%, either owing to rounding or because respondents were able to provide multiple answers to some questions. Appendix Over 20% increase 10% to 20% increase 5% to 10% increase 1% to 5% increase No change Decrease Went from profit to loss in the past 12 months Year-on-year loss widened Don’t know 16 23 12 15 20 9 4 1 1 (% respondents) How has your company’s profitability changed over the past 12 months? Agree Disagree My company often struggles with tackling inefficiencies We can definitely do more to increase our efficiency I'm worried that our competitors are improving their efficiency faster than we are Efficiency is important but growth is our priority I am happy with efficiency at my company 47 10 71 23 52 53 90 29 77 48 (% respondents) Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Select one column in each row.
  7. 7© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Senior management Operations Sales & Marketing Support functions (eg, HR, legal, finance) Distribution IT Supply chain 30 10 23 8 18 25 12 20 7 10 6 17 4 10 Most efficient Least efficient (% respondents) Which parts of your business are the most and least efficient? Technology has saved time at my company Technology has optimised effort at my company Technology has reduced costs at my company Technology has minimised waste at my company Technology has achieved none of the above at my company 33 28 23 7 9 (% respondents) Generally speaking, which of the following best describes how technology has contributed to improved efficiency at your company in the last 12 months? Expanding the business Increasing profitability Reducing costs Raising employee productivity Improving competitiveness Reducing complexity Adding new assets or operations to existing business Pressure on profit margins Making company more attractive to a buy out/merger Returning value to shareholders/owners Optimising environmental impact/carbon footprint 55 33 24 24 15 12 11 5 4 4 3 (% respondents) Which if any of the following factors are likely to be the strongest drivers of efficiency for your business over the next 12 months? Select up to two.
  8. 8 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth 1 Low priority 2 3 4 5 High priority Improve operating efficiency of our business Revenue growth Developing new products or services Business acquisition/merger Entering new markets/opening new distribution channels Attracting and retaining talented staff/employees Raising fresh capital (equity, debt) 5 2 7 12 26302117 512713 20292118 715111354 2119281716 2924251012 914281434 (% respondents) How much of a priority are the following strategic objectives for your company? For each row, move slider along to number best representing the priority level. Train employees to work smarter/alter working practices Update existing IT and technology (hardware or software) Change suppliers/renegotiate supply contracts Invest in new IT and technology not previously used (hardware or software) Move to or increased web-based selling Streamline company structure (including selling assets and consolidating functions) Shift to greater automation, machinery, robotics Employee redundancies/reduce working hours/increase temporary workforce Relocate production/services to lower cost location/outsource company functions to third party (eg, managed service provider) 58 57 42 41 33 31 18 14 14 (% respondents) Which of the following actions has your company undertaken in the past 12 months, or does it plan to undertake in the next 12 months, with improved efficiency as part of the objective? Select all that apply. Mobile working (eg, employees working away from office) Cloud computing (eg storing company data in remote data centre) Enhanced data collection and analysis ("big data") Social networking Business continuity Remote management (eg, managed service provider) Video conferencing /telepresence Collaboration software & tools Bring your own device (eg, employees using own smartphone for work) Virtualisation Other, please specify Don't know 35 34 24 23 17 12 12 11 5 4 3 1 (% respondents) Which of the following technology developments are set to have the biggest positive impact on the efficiency of your business in the next 12 months? Select up to two.
  9. 9© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Resistance to change Lack of technology skills or know-how Weak culture of efficiency Lack of urgency/initiative from leadership Risk of detracting attention from growing business Reluctance to pursue efficiencies beyond cost-cutting Not the right time/stage of company's development High cost of efficiency measures Already pursued all obvious efficiencies Other, please specify There are no meaningful internal constraints 44 30 27 27 27 18 17 17 15 8 11 (% respondents) Which if any of the following internal factors currently limit your company's ability to undertake efficiency initiatives? Select all that apply. Weak economy Lack of available financing Restrictive regulatory framework (eg, employment laws/environmental laws) Shortage of talent Fixed costs of key inputs Poor quality of communications infrastructure (internet speed, connection) Political uncertainty (eg, tax treatment, legislative deadlock) Influence of labour unions Lack of transport infrastructure (roads, airports, seaports) Other, please specify There are no meaningful external constraints 45 32 21 27 22 16 14 8 6 4 14 (% respondents) Which if any of the following external factors limit your company's ability to undertake efficiency initiatives? Select all that apply. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree A culture of efficiency runs through my company My company has made good use of the changing global economic climate to become more efficient Efficiency initiatives must be driven from the top down to be a success Employees at my company are financially incentivised to find efficiencies Changing existing IT systems could eliminate delays and disruption at my company New technology is too expensive New technology developments change too fast 6 7 4 721292814 6 1628409 23243314 4 1193541 34292410 6 14214118 16333312 (% respondents) To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Select one column in each row.
  10. 10 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth United States of America United Kingdom Canada India Germany Netherlands Spain Singapore Switzerland Australia Belgium China Portugal Sweden Denmark Indonesia Malaysia New Zealand Poland Russia Thailand Turkey Vietnam 22 20 9 8 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 (% respondents) Where are you personally located? Western Europe North America Asia-Pacific Eastern Europe 48 31 20 1 (% respondents) In which region are you personally located?
  11. 11© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Less than 250,000 dollars 250,000 to 499,999 dollars 500,000 to 999,999 dollars 1m to 9.99m dollars 10m to 49.9m dollars 35 10 7 35 12 (% respondents) What is your company’s annual global total assets in US dollars ? please select the most appropriate option if your company does not report assets in US dollars 1 to 9 10 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 149 150 to 199 200 to 249 47 29 12 6 3 4 (% respondents) How many people does your company currently employ full-time (including yourself)? Owner/manager/partner Chief executive officer (if different) Chief financial officer (if different) Other C-level (if different) Manager (non C-level) 59 12 8 10 12 (% respondents) What is your job title?
  12. 12 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2013 Smart SMBs: Fine-tuning the engines of growth Technology Financial services Professional services Manufacturing Media & entertainment Agriculture & agribusiness Biotechnology Logistics & distribution Pharmaceuticals Automotive Healthcare/provider care Real estate Retail & wholesale Consumer goods: Education Mining & metals (including coal, steel and aluminium) Power & utilities Aerospace & defence Construction Diversified industrial products Oil & gas Telecommunications 19 16 15 7 7 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 (% respondents) What is the primary industry your company is in? Under 1 year 1 to 2 years 3 to 5 years 6 to 10 years Over 10 years 1 4 21 20 54 (% respondents) How many years has your company been in business?
  13. While every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy of this information, neither The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. nor the sponsor of this report can accept any responsibility or liability for reliance by any person on this article or any of the information, opinions or conclusions set out in this article.
  14. GENEVA Boulevard des Tranchees 16 1206 Geneva Switzerland Tel: +41 22 566 24 70 E-mail: geneva@eiu.com LONDON 25 St James’s Street London, SW1A 1HG United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 7830 7000 E-mail: london@eiu.com FRANKFURT Bockenheimer Landstrasse 51-53 60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany Tel: +49 69 7171 880 E-mail: frankfurt@eiu.com PARIS 6 rue Paul Baudry Paris, 75008 France Tel: +33 1 5393 6600 E-mail: paris@eiu.com DUBAI PO Box 450056 Office No 1301A Thuraya Tower 2 Dubai Media City United Arab Emirates Tel: +971 4 433 4202 E-mail: dubai@eiu.com
Anzeige