SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
222
Rn activity in groundwater of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec,
eastern Canada: relation with local geology and health hazard
Daniele L. Pinti a, *
, Sophie Retailleau a
, Diogo Barnetche a
, Floriane Moreira a
,
Anja M. Moritz b
, Marie Larocque a
, Yves Gelinas b
, Rene Lefebvre c
, Jean-François Helie a
,
Arisai Valadez a
a
GEOTOP and Departement des sciences de la Terre et de l'atmosphere, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, CP 8888 Succ. Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montreal, QC,
Canada
b
GEOTOP and Department of Chemistry and Biogeochemistry, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, H4B 1R6 Montreal, QC, Canada
c
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE), 490 rue de la Couronne, G1K 9A9 QC, Canada
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 February 2014
Received in revised form
8 May 2014
Accepted 27 May 2014
Available online
Keywords:
Radon
Radium
Groundwater
Quebec
Mont-Saint-Hilaire
Health hazards
a b s t r a c t
One hundred ninety-eight groundwater wells were sampled to measure the 222
Rn activity in the region
between Montreal and Quebec City, eastern Canada. The aim of this study was to relate the spatial
distribution of 222
Rn activity to the geology and the hydrogeology of the study area and to estimate the
potential health risks associated with 222
Rn in the most populated area of the Province of Quebec. Most
of the groundwater samples show low 222
Rn activities with a median value of 8.6 Bq/L. Ninety percent of
samples show 222
Rn activity lower than 100 Bq/L, the exposure limit in groundwater recommended by
the World Health Organization. A few higher 222
Rn activities (up to 310 Bq/L) have been measured in
wells from the Appalachian Mountains and from the magmatic intrusion of Mont-Saint-Hilaire, known
for its high level of indoor radon. The spatial distribution of 222
Rn activity seems to be related mainly to
lithology differences between U-richer metasediments of the Appalachian Mountains and magmatic
intrusions and the carbonaceous silty shales of the St. Lawrence Platform. Radon is slightly enriched in
sodium-chlorine waters that evolved at contact with clay-rich formations. 226
Ra, the parent element of
222
Rn could be easily adsorbed on clays, creating a favorable environment for the production and release
of 222
Rn into groundwater. The contribution of groundwater radon to indoor radon or by ingestion is
minimal except for specific areas near Mont-Saint-Hilaire or in the Appalachian Mountains where this
contribution could reach 45% of the total radioactive annual dose.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Radon (222
Rn) is an odorless and colorless radioactive noble gas
that occurs naturally in air, water, rocks and soils (e.g., Ball et al.,
1991; Cecil and Green, 2000). 222
Rn is an isotope derived from
the decay chain of 238
U and more specifically from the a-particle
emission decay of U-daughter element 226
Ra adsorbed on soil
grains or contained in minerals. Radon itself decays to 218
Po with a
half-life of 3.8235 days. The decay of 222
Rn (and its progeny) results
in the release of a-particles that are a potential health hazard if
radon is inhaled or ingested (National Research Council, 1999). A
relationship between lung cancer and inhalation of radon decay
products has been demonstrated for underground miners (Lubin
et al., 1995) and in domestic environments (houses, schools, etc.)
(Lubin and Boice, 1997).
Since 1980, when high 222
Rn activities were found in homes
throughout the United States, concern has focused on the mecha-
nism of 222
Rn enrichment in air. However, the majority of 222
Rn
entering homes is produced underground in rocks and soils and is
then carried to the surface via gas diffusion or groundwater
transport (e.g., Telford, 1983; Nazaroff, 1992). Thus an under-
standing of the 222
Rn production, escape and transport in
groundwater is of vital importance in predicting health hazards.
Radon in groundwater can also contribute, through direct inges-
tion, to the indoor annual dose adsorbed by humans (e.g., Vinson
et al., 2008).
Conclusions from several national studies of radon in public
water supplies and groundwater in the United States (e.g., Horton,
* Corresponding author. Fax: þ1 514 987 3635.
E-mail address: pinti.daniele@uqam.ca (D.L. Pinti).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvrad
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.05.021
0265-931X/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217
1983; Hess et al., 1985; Michel and Jordana, 1987; Longtin, 1988)
indicate that high radon activity in groundwater occurs in
uranium-bearing granite aquifers, in magmatic and metamorphic
bedrock aquifers, or when groundwater is present close to fault
zones. In the United States, main 222
Rn-prone areas include the
Appalachian Mountains, the Rocky Mountains and the Basin and
Range (National Research Council, 1999). In Canada, 222
Rn-prone
areas are located in terrains favorable to the emanation of radon,
such as magmatic and metamorphic rocks of the Canadian Pre-
cambrian shield and their products of alteration (Tilsey et al.,
1993).
In Canada, the harsh climate and the limited ventilation of
homes during the winter season enhance the risk for an increased
concentration of indoor radon. Voluntary radon surveys in houses
were carried out regularly since 1970 (Health Canada, 2009). The
latest recommended action level is 200 Becquerel by air cubic
meter (Bq/m3
) for indoor radon (Health Canada, 2007). Extended
surveys for soil gas radon in major Canadian urban areas are briefly
summarized by Chen et al. (2012). The Geological Survey of Canada
carried out detailed studies of radon in ground water since 1980 in
Saskatchewan, Ontario and Prince Edwards Island (e.g., Dyck, 1979,
1980).
Levesque et al. (1995) carried out a detailed survey for indoor
radon in one thousands homes of the Province of Quebec and
showed that the Gaspe Peninsula and the Appalachian Mountains
regions had the highest222
Rn activities, with averages of 120.8 and
59.7 Bq/m3
respectively. These data were recently updated by
Drolet et al. (2013) to define potential radon emission level maps
in Quebec. Local surveys in homes of the Mount Oka and Mont-
Saint-Hilaire areas, two magmatic intrusions located close to
Montreal, showed high 222
Rn activities (18e10,500 Bq/m3
, geo-
metric mean of 1245 Bq/m3
in Mount Oka (Savard et al., 1998), and
20e1432 Bq/m3
, geometric mean of 69 Bq/m3
in Mont-Saint-
Hilaire (Dessau et al., 2005)). These high values are due to the
high U contents in these rocks (Murphy et al., 1978; Savard et al.,
1998).
Canadian guidelines for radon in groundwater recommend a
maximum activity of 2000 Bq/L. This value is much higher than the
limits recommended in other countries (100 Bq/L is the suggested
value by the World Health Organization, 2008). Roireau and
Zikovsky (1989) carried out a radon survey in 50 drinking water
wells mainly located in a radius of less than 100 km around Mon-
treal and in the north of the “Laurentides” region, where Protero-
zoic metamorphic rocks of the Grenville Province outcrop. They
measured 222
Rn activities between 0.2 and 439 Bq/L with a mean of
16.9 Bq/L (because the authors did not report all the data, the
median or geometric mean cannot be calculated and reported
here), and conclude that the measured activities, similar to those
found in other countries, did not represent a real hazard to water
users. Chah and Zikovsky (1989) carried out 32 radon measure-
ments mostly at the same sites as Roireau and Zikovsky (1989).
They measured 222
Rn activities between 1.6 and 23.1 Bq/L, except
for water samples from the Mount Oka area where the 222
Rn ac-
tivities ranged from 48 to 627 Bq/L.
Although numerous radon surveys were carried out in the
Province of Quebec, most studies do not provide a spatial analysis of
the data. This information is important for public health issues. It is
also essential when using 222
Rn as a short-term groundwater
tracer. This study reports the results of an extensive survey for
222
Rn in groundwater from local municipal and domestic wells in
southern Quebec (Pinti et al., 2013a). The spatial distribution of
222
Rn activity in groundwater in relation to the geology and hy-
drogeology of the study area and the possible health hazards that
222
Rn levels could generate in the most populated area of the
Province of Quebec are discussed.
2. Local geology and hydrogeology
The study area covers 15,435 km2
in the St. Lawrence Lowlands,
a relatively flat plain between Montreal and Quebec City, delimited
by the Appalachian Mountains to the southeast and by the north
shore of the St. Lawrence River to the northwest (Fig. 1). This area
covers totally or partially four administrative regions: Monteregie,
Centre-du-Quebec, Chaudiere-Appalaches and Mauricie. Three
geological provinces are represented: the Cambrian-Ordovician St.
Lawrence Platform; the Ordovician-Devonian Appalachian Moun-
tains; and the Cretaceous magmatic intrusions of the Monteregian
Hills (Fig. 1).
The St. Lawrence Platform corresponds to a Cambrian-Lower
Ordovician siliciclastic and carbonate platform having a
maximum thickness of ca. 1200 m, overlain by a minimum of ca.
1800 m of Middle-Late Ordovician foreland carbonate-clastic de-
posits (Lavoie, 2008). Geographically, it corresponds to the flat area
between Montreal and Quebec City called the St. Lawrence Low-
lands. The Ordovician geological units of the St. Lawrence Platform
represent a regional fractured rock aquifer tapped by the sampled
water wells. The St. Lawrence Platform units of interest in this study
are (Fig. 1): (1) the Utica Shale, a fine-grained limy mudstone with
organic content between 1 and 1.5% targeted for potential shale gas
production (Lavoie et al., 2013). (2) A turbiditic thick succession (up
to 3800 m; Globensky, 1987) of mudstones with subordinate
alternating sandstone and siltstone of the Lorraine Group. This
group is the most exposed unit of the St. Lawrence Platform. (3)
Finally, the Queenston Group, consisting of post-orogenic shale,
sandstone and conglomerate (Globensky, 1987).
The terrains outcropping on the Appalachian Mountains corre-
spond to imbricated thrust sheets composed of Cambrian red
shales (Shefford Group), followed by alternated dolomitic or calcitic
schists, quartzites and phyllades (Bennett, Oak Hill and Caldwell
Groups). Ordovician terrains are mainly formed by pyritic or
graphitic slates (Stanbridge, Melbourne and Bulstrode formations)
to end with black shales alternating with siltstone, sandstone and
arkosic greywacke of the Magog Group (Globensky, 1993).
A nearly continuous till sheet, overlaid by discontinuous patches
of unconsolidated Quaternary sediments made of marine and
lacustrine silt and clay of the Champlain Sea (11,200e9800 yrs) and
sands deposited during marine regression cover the Cambrian-
Ordovician sequence of the St. Lawrence Platform (Lamothe, 1989).
The units of the St. Lawrence Platform and the Appalachian
Mountains are intruded by nine alkaline Cretaceous magmatic in-
trusions, named the Monteregian Hills, one of them, Mont-Saint-
Hilaire is located in the study area and composed of gabbro, py-
roxenite and a few syenite (Eby, 1984).
Most exposed strata in the St. Lawrence Lowlands are sub-
horizontal, but are locally affected by mesoscopic open folding
such as the Chambly-Fortierville Syncline (Fig. 1). Major structural
features in the study area include the Yamaska Fault, one of the
many regional normal faults cutting through the basementeplat-
form succession and the Logan's Line (Fig.1) a thrust fault that mark
the transition between the St. Lawrence Platform and the Appala-
chian Mountains.
The regional aquifers are located in the fractured bedrock of
moderate hydraulic conductivity (~10À6
to 10À5
m/s). They are
semi-confined or confined. In general, wells in the fractured
bedrock aquifers yield enough water to supply single-family
dwellings and, in a few areas, small- to medium-size municipal-
ities (Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a,b). Medium- to high-
yield aquifers are found in coarse-grained surficial sediments, such
as the Quaternary glacio-fluvial or fluvial sediments. In areas close
to the St. Lawrence River, most residential wells tap groundwater
from the rock aquifer whereas municipal wells tap groundwater
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 207
from either the rock or granular aquifers. The main groundwater
flow directions in the bedrock aquifers are SEeNW and follow the
general topography, with recharge occurring mostly in the Appa-
lachian Mountains and discharge to the St. Lawrence River or its
main tributaries. Local recharge areas are also distributed in the
Lowlands, particularly where the impermeable Champlain Sea
clays are absent (Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a,b;
Leblanc et al., 2013).
Groundwater chemistry shows the occurrence of low-salinity
water, dominantly of CaeMgeHCO3 type close to the recharge
areas of the Appalachian Mountains. This water evolves into a Na-
HCO3 type downstream, probably caused by ion exchange (e.g.,
Cloutier et al., 2006), with groundwater electric conductivity
ranging from 88 to 4466 mS/cm in the study area. Saline ground-
water (conductivity from 717 to 31,500 mS/cm) is found in a 10 km
wide zone bordering the St. Lawrence River close to the Chambly-
Fortierville syncline (Larocque et al., 2013a,b). This saline ground-
water becomes clearly brackish in a 2200 km2
area to the north of
the Monteregie Est basin where salinity reaches 5 g/L locally
(Beaudry, 2013). 3
H-3
He ages of the freshwater end-member indi-
cate sub-modern water (2e35 yrs old; Pinti et al., 2013b) in the
Becancour area, while uncorrected 14
C activities of the brackish
end-member suggest ages of 3000e14,000 years (Beaudry, 2013)
corresponding to the Champlain Sea invasion and seawater trap-
ping within the clayey Holocene units.
3. Sampling and analytical methods
A total of 198 wells (167 domestic/municipality supply wells, 23
drilled observation wells and 8 piezometers) were selected, mostly
on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River, with a few located to
the north of it (Fig.1). A total of 165 wells tap groundwater from the
basal Ordovician fractured bedrock aquifer system whereas 33
wells tap groundwater from sandy Quaternary aquifers. Well
depths range from 20 to 225 m. Most of these wells have also been
studied as a part of recent groundwater characterization projects
Fig. 1. Geological map of the study area with the location of the sampled wells. Positions of main faults and the Chambly-Fortierville Syncline are also drawn. Redrawn from
Sejourne et al. (2013).
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217208
funded by the Quebec Ministry of Environment (Programme
d'acquisition de connaissances des eaux souterraines: acronym
PACES). These projects involve sampling and analyses for solute ion
contents, trace elements, stable isotopes of water (dD and d18
O) and
groundwater residence time indicators using 14
C and 3
H/3
He
methods (Larocque et al., 2013a,b; Carrier et al., 2013; Pinti et al.,
2013b).
In the current study, groundwater was collected at the obser-
vation wells using a submersible pump with speed control (Redi-
Flo2®
), which prevents significant water degassing. In municipal
wells, the water was collected directly at the wellhead and in do-
mestic wells at the closest water faucet from the well, taking pre-
cautions to avoid intermediate reservoirs where the water could
degas. Observation wells and domestic wells were purged a volume
equivalent to three times the water volume in the well bore and the
water was sampled once the water physico-chemical parameter
shad stabilized (pH, T and electric conductivity). Municipal wells,
which are continuously pumping, were briefly purged prior to
sampling. Radon was collected using 250 cm3
glass bottles by
inserting a PVC tube to the bottom and filling with water at con-
stant and low flow to avoid degassing. Once filled, the bottle was
rapidly sealed with a plastic cap and examined visually for the
presence of any air bubble. This is a well-tested field method for
sampling radon from water with minimal loss of radon using glass
or PET bottles (Leaney and Herczeg, 2006). The bottles were labeled
with the time of sampling in order to correct the measured 222
Rn
activities of the time lap between field collection and laboratory
analyses.
The sealed and bubble-free bottles were sent to the radon lab-
oratory at Universite du Quebec a Montreal every 2e3 days to
measure the 222
Rn activity using a Hidex SL-300 liquid alpha
scintillometer. Scintillometer efficiency was first calibrated using
international standards. Sampling and analysis protocols were
optimized and analytical tests were performed to obtain the best
possible accuracy and precision of 222
Rn activity in a continuous
interval from 0.5 to 35 Bq/L. Details of the instrument calibration
are reported in Lefebvre et al. (2013).
Sample preparation (radon concentration) before analysis can
be performed following two distinct methods: the direct method
(DM) and the extraction method (EM). In the DM method, a
cocktail of water and di-isopropyl naphthalene (DIN)-based
scintillant is directly prepared in the vial that is inserted in the
scintillometer. Counting is performed directly on this mixture
after homogenization, but errors on DM measures are generally
high (3e10% for 222
Rn activity ranging from 2 to 20 Bq/L; Leaney
and Herczeg, 2006). This method is typically used for water ex-
pected to exceed 2.5 Bq/L in 222
Rn activity. The extraction method,
used for low 222
Rn activity samples, requires more preparation but
loss of radon during manipulation is reduced drastically and
detection level is lowered to 0.003 Bq/L with an average error of
3% (Leaney and Herczeg, 2006). EM manipulation is as follows:
20e50 cm3
of scintillant are mixed with the entire volume of
sampled water (250 cm3
). Approximately 10 cm3
of air are intro-
duced into the glass bottle to facilitate emulsion between water
and the scintillant. The cocktail is mixed for 4e5 min and left to
stand until phases separate. A volume 8 cm3
of scintillant was
then extracted and added to the counting glass vials. During
calibration of the method, mean background noise values were
smaller than 0.12 Bq/L with an average error of 4% for analysis
(Lefebvre et al., 2013).
Radon activity results were interpolated with Kriging using
ESRI®
ArcMap™ 10.1 to create radon distribution maps. The ordi-
nary kriging method with “prediction” output and constant “trend”
was the most reliable from the statistical point of view to represent
the prediction map of the radon activity. The model used for the
kriging is the “stable” type with no assumed anisotropy and does
not include a nugget effect.
4. Results
Radon activities measured in the groundwater wells are re-
ported in Table A1 in the Appendix. Measured 222
Rn activities vary
from 0.2 to 310 Bq/L, in the same range reported by Roireau and
Zikovsky (1989) (see also Fig. 3 for comparison). The histograms
shown in Fig. 2 represent the frequency distributions of 222
Rn
measured in all groundwater samples and separately for wells
located in the Appalachian Mountains and in the St. Lawrence
Platform, i.e. the two main geological provinces in the study area.
Average 222
Rn activity in the entire study area is 25.2 Bq/L while the
wells from the Appalachian Mountains shows a higher average of
31.3 Bq/L compared to an average of 16.1 Bq/Lfor the wells located
in the St. Lawrence Platform.
The distribution of 222
Rn activities is lognormal (Fig. 2) as usu-
ally observed in radon surveys (Zikovsky and Chah, 1990) and,
generally, for element distributions in the geosphere (Ahrens,
1965). Median 222
Rn activities are 8.6 Bq/L for the entire dataset,
5.2 Bq/L for wells from the St. Lawrence Platform and 11.9 Bq/L for
wells in the Appalachian Mountains. These values are higher than
the median values of 2.3 and 3.3 Bq/L reported by Roireau and
Zikovsky (1989) and Chah and Zikovsky (1989), respectively. This
difference could be related to the size of the dataset and the region
covered (198 wells against 50 and 32 wells for Roireau and
Zikovsky, 1989 and Chah and Zikovsky, 1989, respectively). Sam-
pling a larger number of wells increases the probability of tapping
into “anomalous” areas, therefore influencing the median value.
The range of 222
Rn activities measured in this study is also
similar to that measured in Saskatchewan, Canada by Dyck (1979)
and in the United States by Hess et al. (1985) (Fig. 3), though
higher activities have been measured in the nearby State of Maine,
mainly in U-rich granitic terrains (Brutsaert et al.,1981). High radon
activities are characteristics of Nordic countries such as Finland and
Fig. 2. Frequency distribution histograms of the 222
Rn activity measured in wells (a)
from the entire study area; and those located in (b) the St. Lawrence Platform; and (c)
the Appalachian Mountains.
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 209
Norway (Fig. 4), because of the large outcrops of granitic terrains
belonging to the Fennoscandia Precambrian Shield (e.g., Banks
et al., 1998; Morland et al., 1998; Vesterbacka et al., 2005). It was
not possible to illustrate the most complete survey ever carried out
on Fig. 3 (30,957 wells sampled in Sweden; Knutsson and Olofsson,
2002) because no data tables are reported in this work, but 222
Rn
activities as high as 57,000 Bq/L have been measured in U-rich
granitic terrains in this study.
Fig. 4 presents the radon distribution prediction map in the
study area. Results show that higher 222
Rn activities are recorded in
two areas, the Mont-Saint-Hilaire and the Appalachian Mountains.
222
Rn activity reaches 233.4 Bq/L in Mont-Saint-Hilaire, a gabbroic
intrusion of the Cretaceous Monteregian Hills that is already known
for high indoor radon anomalies (20e1432 Bq/m3
; Dessau et al.,
2005). The Appalachian Mountains are also known for high in-
door radon activities (58 Bq/m3
; Levesque et al., 1995). 222
Rn in this
region varies from 0.3 to 310 Bq/L. A few restricted areas with
relatively high 222
Rn activities (30e97 Bq/L) also occur near the St.
Lawrence River. The larger anomaly surrounds the town of Sorel in
the northern part of the Monteregie Est region (Fig. 4), and corre-
sponds to the 2200 km2
area where brackish groundwater has been
found in the fractured rock aquifer confined by thick marine clay
(Beaudry, 2013).
5. Discussion
5.1. Expected radon activity in water
Both the descriptive statistical treatment and the spatial dis-
tribution of 222
Rn activities (Figs. 2 and 4) clearly show that 222
Rn
activities recorded in wells located in the St. Lawrence Platform are
lower than those recorded in wells located in the Appalachian
Mountains. The reason could be simply related to the difference in
lithology. Wells in the St. Lawrence Platform collect groundwater
from fractured carbonate-shale formations whereas groundwater
from the Appalachian Mountains is in contact with graphitic and
black shales and metasediments (slates, schists and phyllades)
which are expected to contain more uranium than the sedimentary
rocks belonging to the St. Lawrence Platform.
The concentration of U needed to produce the measured 222
Rn
activities can be estimated by simple calculation. The 222
Rn activity
in water derives from the radioactive decay of 226
Ra (a daughter
element of 238
U) adsorbed on the solid grains or contained in
minerals (Cecil and Green, 2000). Thus the 222
Rn activity in water
can be estimated from the U content of the rock, and assuming
secular equilibrium between 226Ra in the solid phase and 222
Rn in
the water phase (25 days; Andrews and Lee, 1979), following the
equation modified from, e.g. Bonotto and Caprioglio (2002):
½222
RnŠwater ¼ 12:469$r$ð1 À f=fÞ$ARn$½UŠrock (1)
where [222
Rn]water is the radon activity in the liquid phase calcu-
lated in Bq/L; r is the bulk density of rock (g/cm3
); (1 À f/f) is the
void ratio (unit less); ARn is the emanation coefficient of radon (unit
less) and [U] the concentration of U in the rock (mg/kg). The
emanation coefficient is the fraction of the total activity of 222
Rn
produced by 226
Ra decay that escapes from the rock to the pores of
the medium. The constant 12.496 is the 238
U disintegration rate
recalculated to take into account the correct units to convert the
final [222
Rn]water to Bq/L (Bonotto and Caprioglio, 2002).
The average aquifer porosity and the radon emanation coeffi-
cient are the two parameters that are the most difficult to evaluate
and they are source of the larger uncertainties. Based on pumping
tests, Larocque et al. (2013a) suggest porosities of 1e5% for the
fractured Ordovician aquifers around Becancour (Fig.1). Nowamooz
et al. (2013) report porosities for the Lorraine shales (the most
widespread terrain in the St. Lawrence Lowlands) and the Utica
shales of 3.5 ± 1%. Ryder (2008) reports porosities of the Queenston
shale of 3e4%. These porosity values are on the order of those
measured in Cambro-Ordovician lower sandstone and carbonate
unit cores of the St. Lawrence Platform, which vary between
1.22 ± 0.24% and 6.22 ± 0.18% (Tran Ngoc et al., 2014). Cambrio-
Ordovician metasedimentary series of the Appalachian Mountains
constitute aquifers of poor permeability (Simard and Des Rosiers,
1979) with porosities equivalent to those of the fractured lithol-
ogies of the St. Lawrence Platform, or lower. To cover the entire
porosity range encountered in the study area, we assume a porosity
(f) from 1 to 5%. The emanation coefficient of 222
Rn depends on
lithology, temperature and moisture content (e.g., Ball et al., 1991;
Nazaroff, 1992). Characteristic emanation coefficients for silty and
clayey rocks, which closely relate to the terrains outcropping in the
study area, range between 11 and 31% (Markkanen and Arvela,
1992).
Using the above values of porosity and emanation coefficients,
and assuming secular equilibrium, U contents from 0.2 to 2.2 mg/kg
for the rocks of the St. Lawrence Platform and from 0.3 to 2.9 mg/kg
for the rocks of the Appalachian Mountains are needed to produce
the 222
Rn activities recorded in our water samples. Calculated U
contents are in agreement with those estimated by Pinti et al.
(2011) for the carbonate-silty facies of the St. Lawrence Platform
(0.4e2.0 mg/kg of U) and for the gabbro-pyroxenite-diorite in-
trusions of the Monteregian Hills such as Mont-Saint-Hilaire
(0.3e2.5 mg/kg U) (Pinti et al., 2011).
The U contents in the slate and schistose terrains of the Appa-
lachian Mountains are not well known but certainly reach or even
exceed the values estimated above for the rocks of the St. Lawrence
Platform. Uranium enrichment in these terrains is clearly evidenced
by the occurrence of several U mineralizations along the Appala-
chians piedmont and highlands, often at the contact with granitic
bodies, as observed in Vermont State, USA (Dahlkamp, 2010). A few
U anomalies have been discovered by the Canadian Johns-Manville
Company in 1968 in the area of Thetford Mines, which is just a few
Fig. 3. Range of 222
Rn activity recorded in groundwater in this study compared to
those measured in Quebec, Canada, the USA and other countries worldwide (when
available, the number of samples is shown on the bar corresponding to each study).
References are: Dyck (1979) (Canada); Brutsaert et al. (1981) (Maine); Hess et al. (1985)
(USA); Graves (1989) (United Kingdom and Italy); Roireau and Zikovsky (1989)
(Quebec [1]); Chah and Zikovsky (1989) (Quebec [2]); Soto et al. (1995) (Spain);
Freyer et al. (1997) (Germany); Kulich et al. (1997) (Sweden); Morland et al. (1998)
(Norwegian, Quaternary); Banks et al. (1998) (Norwegian, bedrock); Alabdula'aly
(1999) (Saudi Arabia); Han et al. (2004) (Taiwan); Vesterbacka et al. (2005) (Finland).
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217210
tens of km SE of the highest 222
Rn activity that we recorded in the
Appalachian Mountains (Figs. 1 and 4).
The general distribution of 222
Rn activity in the study area ap-
pears to be closely related to the geology with a clear NEeSW
oriented anomalous region corresponding to the Appalachian
Mountains and the isolated spot of the Mont-Saint-Hilaire
magmatic intrusion (Fig. 4). Other local anomalies, such as those
observed close to the St. Lawrence River could be explained by the
local geology and hydrogeology.
5.2. Radon distribution: relation with lithology and water
chemistry
Fig. 5 shows the frequency distribution of the 222
Rn activity for
the three most represented rock aquifer types in the area, i.e. the
carbonate or silty shales and mudstones occurring mainly in the St.
Lawrence Lowlands and some areasin the Appalachians Mountains,
and the slate and schist-phyllades occurring in the Appalachian
Mountains. The larger 222
Rn anomalies have been detected in
groundwater from schist-phyllade aquifers rather than in slate and
shales. This behavior could be related to an increased U content in
these rocks though there is no known evidence of increasing U
Fig. 4. Interpolated spatial distribution of the 222
Rn activity in the study area. The traces of geological unit boundaries and structural features from Fig. 1 are shown in background,
including Oak Hill formation for the Appalachian Mountains (dotted area).
Fig. 5. Probabilistic density distribution of 222
Rn activities measured in groundwater
flowing in: (a) shale, (b) schist-phyllade and (c) slate.
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 211
content with the metamorphic grade (e.g., Dostal and Capedri,
1978). Most of the highest 222
Rn activities in groundwater were
observed in Oak Hill Group (222
Rn average activity of 18.6 Bq/L and
median of 52 Bq/L) (Fig. 4), which is composed of phyllades,
quartzites and dolomites.
If the 222
Rn activity is plotted against the main groundwater
types in the region (Fig. 6), i.e. CaeMgeHCO3, Na-HCO3 and NaeCl
(Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a), the NaeCl type waters
show more frequent anomalies in 222
Rn, although not in absolute
intensities. Cloutier et al. (2006; 2010) proposed a general model to
explain the evolution of groundwater chemistry in a sedimentary
rock aquifer located North of the St. Lawrence River. At recharge,
freshwater flowing in unconfined aquifers acquires Ca-Mg-HCO3
chemical character by interacting with dolostone and limestone
units of the St. Lawrence Platform. This water evolves toward a Na-
HCO3 type by Ca2þ
eNaþ
ion exchange, where Ca2þ
water exchanges
with Naþ
mineral in semi-confined to confined aquifers. Finally, close
to the St. Lawrence River, groundwater evolves to a NaeCl type with
salinity probably derived from exchange of freshwater with pore
seawater trapped into the Champlain Sea clays or the fractured rock
aquifers, especially in areas confined by thick marine clay that have
limited recharge (Beaudry et al., 2011). Under neutral/alkaline
conditions, 226
Ra, the parent element of 222
Rn is rapidly adsorbed
on the surface of clay minerals (e.g., Ames et al., 1983; Pickler et al.,
2012; Wood et al., 2004; Vinson et al., 2013). The proximity of this
sorbed 226
Ra to the active groundwater flow system allows the
release of its decay progeny 222
Rn directly to the water phase
(Wood et al., 2004). This process could explain why we observe
patchy 222
Rn anomalies close to the St. Lawrence River (Fig. 4),
where fractured aquifers are often confined by a thick marine clay
layers.
5.3. Evaluating health risks from groundwater radon measurements
The 222
Rn dissolved in groundwater constitutes a potential risk
for human health. Inhalation of radon progeny accounts for about
89% of the risk associated with domestic water use, with almost 11%
resulting from direct ingestion of radon in drinking water (USEPA,
1999).
The estimation of the increment of airborne 222
Rn in a dwelling,
arising from the use of water that contains dissolved radon is a
complex problem. It involves the solubility of radon in water, the
amount of water used in the dwelling, the volume of the dwelling,
and the ventilation rate. The increase in the indoor radon concen-
tration due to radon release from indoor water use is described by
the transfer coefficient T (unit less):
T ¼
DCa
Cw
(2)
where (DCa) is the average increase of the indoor radon concen-
tration that results from using water having an average radon
concentration of CW. The accepted value of T is 1 ± 0.2 Â 10À4
(National Research Council, 1999). This means that a given activity
of 222
Rn in groundwater adds approximately 1/10,000 as much to
the radon concentration in the air. As an example, the geometric
mean of the 222
Rn activity measured in this study is 10 Bq/L (or
10,000 Bq/m3
), which means that water could contribute to the
total indoor radon by 1 Bq/m3
.
The study by Levesque et al. (1995) on indoor radon carried out
roughly in the same area as the current study (Monteregie,
Lanaudiere, Chaudiere-Appalaches) reports a geometric mean for
indoor 222
Rn concentrations of 42.1 to 59.7 Bq/m3
in the building
basement and from 15.8 to 26.5 Bq/m3
for the ground floor. This
means that 222
Rn from groundwater (median of 8.6 Bq/L all over
the study area) might contribute from 1.4 to 5.4% of the total indoor
radon.
Contribution to indoor radon can be estimated in areas were the
222
Rn activity in groundwater exceeds the 200 Bq/L. At Mont-Saint-
Hilaire, the maximum 222
Rn activity measured is 233,400 Bq/m3
of
water (233.4 Bq/L), which means that the contribution of 222
Rn
dissolved in water to indoor radon could amount to 23.4 Bq/m3
. A
survey carried out in 40 homes at Mont-Saint-Hilairein 2001
showed that in 77% of the houses the 222
Rn activity in air was lower
than 150 Bq/m3
while for the 20% of them the 222
Rn activity ranged
from 150 to 800 Bq/m3
, and only one house showed a very high
value (1432 Bq/m3
) (Dessau et al., 2005). The indoor 222
Rn average
activity per home was calculated to be 178 Bq/m3
. This means that
radon from groundwater could contribute for 2e3% in the houses
showing the highest indoor 222
Rn activities (800e1432 Bq/m3
).
However in houses having indoor radon contents of 150e178 Bq/
m3
or less, the contribution from groundwater radon could be as
much as 13e15%. Although not dramatic, this contribution is not
negligible.
The other radon risk for human health is its direct ingestion by
drinking water (USEPA, 1999). The annual effective dose (AED in
micro-Sievert per year or mSv/yr) derived from ingestion of radon
and its adsorption on the stomach wall can be calculated following
the simple equation:
AEDðmSV=yrÞ ¼ 222
Rn activityðBq=LÞ Â dose coefficientðSv=BqÞ
 annual water consumptionðL=yrÞ Â 1  106
(3)
The dose coefficient, more commonly known as the “equivalent
dose to stomach per unit activity of 222
Rn ingested” has been
calculated by several authors and ranges between 1.6 Â 10À9
(Harley and Robbins, 1994) to 3.0 Â 10À7
Sv/Bq (Crawford-Brown,
1989). The average accepted value of the dose coefficient for
adults is 3.5 Â10À9
Sv/Bq (National Research Council, 1999).
Assuming an average drinking water consumption of 730 L/year
(World Health Organization, 2002) and a median 222
Rn activity
value of 8.6 Bq/L for the entire study area (Fig. 2), we can estimate
atotal annual dose of 22.5 mSv/yr through water ingestion. This
dose corresponds only to 1.3% of the total annual dose received by
Canadians (1769 mSv/yr; Grasty and LaMarre, 2004). However, in
areas where 222
Rn activity in groundwater is high, such as Mont-
Fig. 6. Probabilistic density distribution of 222
Rn activities measured in (a) Na-HCO3,
(b) NaCl and (c) CaeMgeHCO3 groundwater types.
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217212
Saint-Hilaire (222
Rn ¼ 233.4 Bq/L; Fig. 4 and Table A1) or in the
Appalachian piedmont (222
Rn ¼ 310 Bq/L; Fig. 4), the dose received
by direct ingestion of radon ranges from 596 to 793 mSv/yr, i.e. an
additional 34e45% of the mean annual dose. This dose becomes
more important for small children for which the effective dose
coefficient is assumed to be 1 Â10À8
Sv/Bq (National Research
Council, 1999). The added dose by drinking water could then
reach 96e128% of the average radioactive annual dose.
6. Conclusions
Measurements of 222
Rn activity in groundwater from 198 wells
between Montreal and Quebec City provided the first distribution
map of 222
Rn activity in the shallow exploited aquifers of the most
populated region of the Province of Quebec (Fig. 4). Results show
that 90% of the wells have 222
Rn activities lower than 100 Bq/L, the
maximum concentration limit accepted by the World Health
Organization (2008), a few wells spanning between 100 and 310
Bq/L. These anomalous higher values occur in groundwater flowing
close to the magmatic intrusion of Mont-Saint-Hilaire and in
metasedimentary aquifers of the Appalachian Mountains. At Mont-
Saint-Hilaire and in the Appalachian Mountains, 15% of the indoor
radon and 45% of the total radioactive annual dose receives
contribution from the groundwater radon.
The spatial distribution of 222
Rn in the region seems to be
related to the lithological characteristics of the terrain in the study
area. The next step would be to improve sampling resolution, in
particular in the Appalachian Mountains, where the higher
anomalies are concentrated (Fig. 4). This is the topic of a com-
plementary project aimed at measuring the main physico-
chemical parameters of groundwater along with 222
Rn activities
in an additional 120 wells in this area, therefore providing more
than 200 wells in a smaller area of 3400 km2
. This resolution will
be helpful to better understand the role of watererock in-
teractions and water mixing in the spatial distribution of radon
and to facilitate the use of 222
Rn as a tracer of groundwater in
surface water.
Acknowledgments
We thank the handling editor, Dr. Paul Martin and two anon-
ymous reviewers for their fruitful comments. We wish to thank
the municipalities and private citizens who allowed collection of
water samples for this study. Ch^atelaine Beaudry and Xavier Malet
(INRS), Antoine Armandine Les landes (Universite Rennes 1), Mina
Ibrahim (Concordia University) and Christine Boucher (GEOTOP)
are thanked for their help during sampling. This research was
funded by the Quebec Ministry of Environment (Ministere du
Developpement durable, de l'Environnement, de la Faune et des
Parcs) (study EES E3-9) and the Quebec Province Research Funds
(FRQ-NT, Fonds de Recherche Quebec e Nature et Technologie)
through the program Initiatives Strategiques pour l'Innovation
(project no. 163607).
Appendix A
Table A1
Radon measurements in the study area.
Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222
Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr
BEC002 À72.079 46.300 9.50 395 7.43 3.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 9
BEC005 À72.078 46.181 9.40 569 7.34 11.5 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 29
BEC007 À72.081 46.400 8.80 252 9.24 11.0 0.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 28
BEC009 À72.007 46.251 9.90 120 7.82 1.7 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4
BEC010 À71.932 46.269 10.40 124 8.08 1.5 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4
BEC014 À71.984 46.446 10.30 640 8.82 4.1 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 10
BEC015 À71.924 46.528 9.20 172 9.19 19.6 0.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 50
BEC016 À71.931 46.487 8.60 202 8.63 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 8
BEC021 À71.951 46.323 11.10 206 8.14 7.0 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 18
BEC028 À72.058 46.113 12.90 335 8.11 12.1 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 31
BEC029 À71.996 46.170 10.10 203 7.81 2.7 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 7
BEC030 À71.936 46.163 10.50 227 8.87 110.6 4.4 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 283
BEC031 À71.920 46.205 8.50 198 8.37 50.3 2.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 128
BEC032 À71.857 46.166 9.40 382 6.79 17.9 0.7 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 46
BEC034 À71.850 46.241 9.50 126 8.02 4.1 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 10
BEC036 À71.789 46.209 12.50 430 7.22 13.8 0.6 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 35
BEC056 À72.248 46.250 10.60 553 8.23 5.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 13
BEC100 À72.073 46.260 10.40 128 8.97 32.1 1.3 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 82
BEC101 À72.168 46.276 9.90 571 9.22 4.5 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 12
BEC102 À72.029 46.489 8.10 283 7.74 42.6 1.7 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 109
BEC103 À72.320 46.148 11.10 351 7.28 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 8
BEC104 À72.257 46.105 8.97 89 8.60 11.9 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 30
BEC105 À72.001 46.364 10.40 158 6.20 5.7 0.2 SL Platform Slate Granular Ca-HCO3 15
BEC106 À72.227 46.368 9.00 44 6.59 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 8
BEC107 À72.247 46.215 11.00 131 8.27 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 13
BEC108 À72.410 46.223 8.50 448 7.91 9.5 0.4 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 24
BEC109 À72.151 46.344 9.80 42 5.53 4.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 10
BEC110 À72.501 46.185 8.70 236 8.17 10.5 0.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 27
BEC111 À72.217 46.238 8.60 194 7.34 5.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 13
BEC114 À71.663 46.296 8.00 180 7.48 14.4 0.6 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 37
BEC117 À72.108 46.544 7.50 70 7.00 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 13
BEC119 À72.052 46.509 11.40 205 7.69 18.7 0.7 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 48
BEC120 À72.486 46.191 9.70 315 8.36 7.3 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 19
BEC121 À72.386 46.163 10.30 681 8.46 12.4 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 32
BEC122 À72.380 46.117 9.50 254 8.06 2.6 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7
BEC124 À71.600 46.250 14.80 42 6.53 23.7 0.9 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-HCO3-Cl 60
BEC126 À71.545 46.304 8.90 153 8.06 3.9 0.2 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 10
(continued on next page)
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 213
Table A1 (continued )
Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222
Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr
BEC127 À71.489 46.274 9.80 91 6.22 101.5 4.1 Appalachians Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 259
BEC130 À71.768 46.175 10.10 506 7.04 2.2 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6
BEC132 À71.699 46.149 9.50 135 6.60 65.5 2.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 167
BEC139 À71.555 46.338 9.50 252 7.86 12.9 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 33
BEC140 À71.606 46.083 9.40 85 6.36 63.8 2.6 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 163
BEC144 À72.455 46.198 10.30 394 7.11 74.4 3.0 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 190
BEC145 À72.425 46.173 11.90 339 7.68 8.7 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 22
BEC147 À71.816 46.347 9.60 150 7.55 13.1 0.5 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-SO4 33
BEC148 À71.772 46.326 8.70 107 8.55 10.2 0.4 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 26
BEC149 À71.803 46.256 9.40 183 8.07 1.6 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4
BEC201 À71.804 46.573 7.60 e 7.41 8.0 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 20
BEC203 À72.113 46.413 9.80 e 6.20 2.9 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 7
BEC204 À71.980 46.550 8.90 e 8.78 14.2 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 36
CHM001 À72.402 46.439 10.60 e 6.71 3.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 10
INRS MSH À73.154 45.539 8.45 180 8.16 233.4 9.3 SL Platform Gabbro Fractured Na-HCO3 596
INRS P03 À72.912 45.872 8.68 2861 7.09 97.0 3.9 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 248
INRS P06 À72.584 45.675 9.60 288 7.56 2.7 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7
INRS P08 À73.129 45.878 9.61 13527 6.87 84.1 3.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 215
INRS P10 À72.872 45.065 7.36 191 7.36 1.0 0.0 Appalachians Limestone Fractured Ca-HCO3 3
INRS P13 À73.314 45.638 8.91 1722 7.49 32.9 1.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 84
INRS P14 À72.764 45.880 8.93 1000 7.42 7.1 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 18
INRS P23 À73.333 45.368 10.58 2280 8.61 1.1 0.0 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 3
INRS109 À72.770 45.342 9.46 222 7.53 8.5 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 22
INRS115 À72.771 45.224 9.64 191 7.53 1.5 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 4
INRS129 À72.982 45.563 11.10 1181 8.33 4.1 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 11
INRS131 À72.918 45.692 10.20 276 8.03 3.6 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 9
INRS143 À72.504 45.333 9.81 185 7.21 22.0 0.9 Appalachians Schists Fractured Mg-HCO3 56
INRS149 À72.594 45.575 10.50 154 7.98 7.2 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Mg-HCO3 18
INRS155 À72.439 45.033 10.33 364 6.90 148.5 5.9 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 379
INRS164 À72.361 45.539 9.80 183 7.25 64.8 2.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 165
INRS169 À72.384 45.429 10.68 160 7.55 249.7 10.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 638
INRS177 À73.294 45.501 9.66 677 7.88 6.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 15
INRS183 À73.378 45.679 9.89 2956 7.43 3.1 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 8
INRS188 À73.244 45.714 14.04 2912 6.59 0.2 0.0 SL Platform Limestone Fractured Na-Cl 0
INRS199 À72.716 45.484 10.00 292 8.31 71.1 2.8 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 182
INRS210 À72.829 45.546 10.08 363 6.81 2.1 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 5
INRS212 À72.741 45.578 10.70 348 7.99 8.8 0.4 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 23
INRS213 À72.668 45.550 10.80 143 7.97 2.1 0.1 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 5
INRS214 À72.750 45.718 9.50 1141 8.23 0.9 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-Cl 2
INRS221 À73.264 45.391 10.83 462 7.81 37.0 1.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 95
INRS224 À73.240 45.470 11.10 767 9.11 16.1 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 41
INRS227 À73.020 45.474 10.53 216 8.12 9.9 0.4 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 25
INRS232 À73.014 45.287 11.10 387 7.46 1.7 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Ca-HCO3 4
INRS233 À72.993 45.367 11.46 327 6.95 3.4 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 9
INRS234 À73.120 45.347 10.40 531 7.16 5.4 0.2 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Ca-HCO3 14
INRS240 À72.965 45.166 12.59 550 6.83 3.2 0.1 Appalachians Mudstone Granular Ca-HCO3 8
INRS251 À73.398 45.150 10.46 500 6.96 8.8 0.4 SL Platform Limestone Fractured Ca-HCO3 22
INRS256 À73.221 45.200 10.60 337 7.86 1.8 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 5
INRS263 À72.659 45.017 9.89 53 6.33 15.3 0.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 39
INRS269 À72.509 45.134 9.21 64 6.37 13.5 0.5 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 34
INRS270 À72.890 45.448 10.98 130 7.71 21.2 0.8 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 54
INRS276 À72.808 45.803 9.50 515 8.50 1.3 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3
INRS278 À73.222 45.284 11.50 329 8.17 2.3 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 6
INRS280 À73.084 45.213 10.20 222 9.00 2.8 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 7
INRS285 À72.676 45.792 12.70 525 7.10 2.5 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6
INRS300 À72.926 45.272 10.00 316 8.32 13.8 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 35
NSF001 À71.925 46.034 13.45 117 7.00 19.5 0.8 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 50
NSF002 À71.924 46.114 9.22 112 7.14 8.6 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 22
NSF003 À72.547 45.973 11.27 592 7.89 2.5 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 6
NSF004 À72.424 45.865 10.88 194 7.98 5.9 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 15
NSF005 À72.387 45.851 9.70 286 8.77 21.6 0.9 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 55
NSF006 À72.475 45.819 9.44 205 8.35 14.7 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 38
NSF007 À72.485 46.063 9.12 216 8.22 8.6 0.3 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 22
NSF008 À72.254 45.986 10.22 291 7.55 5.8 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 15
NSF009 À72.184 45.921 12.00 e 8.15 28.4 1.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured e 73
NSF010 À71.807 46.100 7.64 99 7.67 101.5 4.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 259
NSF011 À71.808 45.979 9.09 88 9.17 30.5 1.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 78
NSF012 À72.089 46.003 9.09 99 8.60 4.8 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 12
NSF013 À72.709 46.025 8.60 118 7.55 6.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 16
NSF014 À72.543 46.097 9.52 e 8.67 11.9 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 30
NSF015 À72.424 45.929 10.71 381 9.13 1.7 0.1 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 4
NSF016 À72.495 45.758 9.35 290 7.67 7.2 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 18
NSF017 À72.518 45.818 10.80 202 7.36 49.2 2.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 126
NSF018 À72.680 45.965 9.30 218 7.83 5.5 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 14
NSF019 À72.252 45.865 11.42 161 7.76 3.1 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Mg-HCO3 8
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217214
Table A1 (continued )
Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222
Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr
NSF020 À72.343 45.983 8.40 e 7.51 5.5 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured e 14
NSF021 À72.005 45.955 9.90 e 7.49 5.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured e 13
NSF022 À72.091 45.841 8.10 237 7.80 10.4 0.4 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 27
NSF023 À72.338 45.670 8.00 159 7.70 25.8 1.0 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 66
NSF024 À72.677 46.011 10.20 1097 7.96 12.0 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 31
NSF134 À72.241 45.726 9.40 235 7.74 8.0 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 21
NSF135 À72.295 45.759 8.90 270 6.78 62.3 2.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 159
NSF136 À72.370 45.802 10.20 355 7.46 4.4 0.2 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-Cl 11
NSF137 À72.450 45.907 10.40 280 8.08 6.7 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 17
NSF138 À72.401 45.878 9.30 155 7.88 1.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3
NSF139 À72.405 45.842 10.20 100 7.91 5.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 13
NSF140 À72.452 45.859 16.90 137 7.37 0.3 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 1
NSF141 À72.570 45.905 10.10 e 7.90 2.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate e e 6
NSF144 À72.617 45.933 10.50 184 8.18 1.8 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 5
NSF145 À72.668 45.955 11.20 351 7.78 3.5 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 9
NSF146 À72.702 45.990 10.40 277 6.67 3.1 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 8
NSF147 À72.726 46.026 9.50 1099 8.18 19.6 0.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 50
NSF148 À72.120 45.888 12.20 429 6.84 14.9 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 38
NSF149 À72.205 45.902 10.60 229 7.27 12.3 0.5 Appalachians Slate Granular Na-HCO3 31
NSF150 À72.367 45.971 10.10 234 6.43 12.4 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-Cl 32
NSF151 À72.314 45.941 8.30 156 8.30 8.2 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 21
NSF152 À72.261 45.919 12.00 169 7.75 4.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 11
NSF153 À72.344 45.995 9.30 317 7.14 11.1 0.4 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 28
NSF157 À72.435 46.105 9.70 40 5.32 14.8 0.6 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 38
NSF158 À72.358 46.060 9.50 234 8.53 8.2 0.3 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 21
NSF165 À71.685 45.886 9.60 312 5.65 168.1 6.7 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 429
NSF166 À71.746 45.911 16.10 366 6.11 116.9 4.7 Appalachians e Granular Na-Cl 299
NSF167 À71.887 45.999 13.00 78 5.80 72.2 2.9 Appalachians Phyllade Granular Ca-HCO3 184
NSF182 À71.788 45.934 9.20 206 7.89 134.6 5.4 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 344
NSF200 À71.653 45.662 8.20 113 5.96 100.4 4.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 257
NSF215 À71.746 45.706 8.90 318 6.50 49.8 2.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 127
NSF216 À71.829 45.749 9.80 164 9.80 310.3 12.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 793
NSF217 À71.891 45.780 10.20 165 7.68 35.6 1.4 Appalachians Volcanics Fractured Ca-HCO3 91
NSF218 À71.991 45.812 12.60 230 7.05 4.9 0.2 Appalachians Schists Granular Ca-HCO3 13
NSF219 À71.998 45.852 8.80 120 6.23 3.8 0.2 Appalachians Phyllade Granular Ca-HCO3 10
NSF220 À72.039 45.885 9.10 130 7.83 8.8 0.4 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 22
NSF221 À72.075 45.863 9.40 256 7.29 2.5 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6
NSF222 À72.403 45.990 10.00 320 8.60 12.6 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 32
NSF223 À72.447 46.021 10.70 349 7.60 14.7 0.6 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 38
NSF224 À72.511 46.052 9.60 1073 7.85 15.6 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 40
NSF225 À72.537 46.087 10.20 224 7.95 15.2 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 39
NSF226 À72.050 46.084 11.40 179 8.00 15.9 0.6 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 41
NSF227 À72.129 46.071 10.30 602 8.47 17.8 0.7 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 45
NSF228 À72.177 46.085 10.80 156 7.56 13.2 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 34
NSF229 À72.256 46.059 10.80 176 8.69 13.7 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 35
NSF230 À72.314 46.063 9.30 151 7.91 19.3 0.8 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 49
NSF231 À72.314 46.063 9.60 366 7.39 17.4 0.7 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 44
NSF232 À72.889 46.042 10.30 178 7.76 69.3 2.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 177
NSF234 À71.704 46.028 10.10 39 5.86 198.7 7.9 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 508
NSF240 À71.798 46.183 10.80 578 6.74 14.7 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 37
NSF241 À71.771 46.132 12.00 162 6.35 14.0 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 36
NSF244 À71.866 46.081 9.90 312 7.36 10.3 0.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 26
NSF245 À71.541 45.858 10.50 106 7.30 60.9 2.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 156
NSF247 À71.689 46.058 13.10 71 6.29 5.6 0.2 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 14
NSF268 À72.476 45.820 14.90 177 7.60 7.8 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 20
NSF269 À72.389 45.852 10.30 302 8.46 16.0 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 41
NSF270 À72.424 45.865 12.80 161 7.50 3.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 8
NSF271 À72.551 45.975 12.00 652 7.89 2.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7
NSFPZ2 À72.523 46.027 9.80 197 7.91 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 13
NSFPZ20 À72.518 45.976 8.20 e 8.00 1.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate À e 3
NSFPZ21 À72.518 45.976 9.90 92 6.83 0.6 0.0 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-HCO3 2
NSFPZ3 À72.519 46.006 10.90 396 7.50 1.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 4
NSFPZ6 À72.010 46.089 10.50 397 7.27 6.7 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 17
NSFPZ7P À72.036 46.088 12.00 e 6.40 8.4 0.3 Appalachians e e e 22
NSFPZ7S À72.070 46.081 12.00 108 6.40 31.5 1.3 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 80
NSFPZ8 À71.759 45.766 9.10 258 6.61 105.0 4.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 268
NSFR1 À72.725 46.141 8.70 18044 8.10 7.9 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 20
NSFR2 À72.097 46.013 15.00 127 7.85 10.4 0.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 27
NSFR3-2 À71.699 45.686 11.50 138 7.13 147.9 5.9 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 378
NSFR4 À72.398 45.848 8.06 241 8.06 0.7 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 2
NSFR5 À72.045 45.789 10.20 217 7.72 11.5 0.5 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 29
NSFR6 À71.821 45.865 9.60 3923 7.63 123.8 5.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 316
NSFR8-1 À72.528 46.155 9.40 6183 7.25 60.8 2.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 155
ROC01 À71.618 46.201 8.50 47 5.99 66.4 2.7 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 170
(continued on next page)
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 215
References
Alabdula'aly, A., 1999. Occurrence of radon in the central region groundwater of
Saudi Arabia. J. Environ. Radioact. 44, 85e95.
Ames, L.L., McGarrah, J.E., Walker, B.A., 1983. Sorption of trace constituents from
aqueous solutions onto secondary minerals. II. Radium. Clay Clay Mineral. 31,
335e342.
Andrews, J.N., Lee, D.J., 1979. Inert gases in groundwater from the Bunter Sandstone
of England as indicators of age and palaeoclimatic trends. J. Hydrol. 41,
233e252.
Ahrens, L.H., 1965. Distribution of Elements in Our Planet. McGraw-Hill, New York,
p. 110.
Ball, T.K., Cameron, D.G., Colman, T.B., Roberts, P.D., 1991. Behaviour of radon in the
geological environment: a review. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 24, 169e182.
Banks, D., Frengstad, B., Midtgård, A.K., Krog, J.R., Strand, T., 1998. The chemistry
ofNorwegian groundwaters. I. The distribution of radon, major and minor ele-
ments in 1604 crystalline bedrock groundwaters. Sci. Total Environ. 222, 71e91.
Beaudry, C., Malet, X., Lefebvre, R., Rivard, C., 2011. Delimitation des eaux sou-
terraines saum^atres en Monteregie Est, Quebec, Canada. Geological Survey
CanadaOpen File Report 6970. Available at: http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/fr/nrcan-
rncan/ess-sst/bfea4c4c-aca8-5fc5-9b22-7aefb31eb245.html (in French).
Beaudry, C., 2013. Hydrogeochimie de l'aquifere rocheux regional en Monteregie
est, Quebec. M.Sc. thesis. Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS),
Quebec, Canada, p. 196. Available at: http://espace.inrs.ca/1363/ (in French).
Bonotto, D.M., Caprioglio, L., 2002. Radon in groundwaters from Guarany aquifer,
South America: environmental and exploration implications. Appl. Radiat. Isot.
57, 931e940.
Brutsaert, W.F., Norton, S.A., Hess, C.T., Williams, J.S., 1981. Geologic and hydrologic
factors controlling radon-222 in ground waterin Maine. Ground Water19, 407e417.
Carrier, M.-A., Lefebvre, R., Rivard, C., et al., 2013. Portrait des ressources en eau
souterraine en Monteregie Est, Quebec, Canada. Final Report INRS R-1412.
Available at. http://espace.inrs.ca/1639/ (in French).
Cecil, D.L., Green, J., 2000. Radon-222. In: Cook, P., Herczeg, A.L. (Eds.), Environ-
mental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dor-
drecht, the Netherlands, 175e194.
Chah, B., Zikovsky, L., 1989. A new method for the determination of radon in water
by scintillation in ortho-xylene. Rev. Sci. Eau 3, 343e354.
Chen, J., Moir, D., MacLellan, K., Leigh, E., Nunez, D., Murphy, S., Ford, K., 2012. Soil
radon measurements in the Canadian cities. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 151, 172e174.
Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M.M., Bourque, E., Therrien, R., 2006. Hydro-
geochemistry and groundwater origin of the Basses-Laurentides sedimentary
rock aquifer system, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, Canada. Hydrogeol. J. 14,
573e590.
Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M.M., Therrien, R., 2010. Desalination of a sedi-
mentary rock aquifer system invaded by Pleistocene Champlain Sea water and
processes controlling groundwater geochemistry. Environ. Earth Sci. 59,
977e994.
Crawford-Brown, D.J., 1989. The biokinetics and dosimetry of radon-222 in the
human body following ingestion of ground water. Environ. Geochem. Health 11,
10e17.
Dahlkamp, F.J., 2010. Appalachian Highlands and Piedmont. In: Dahlkamp, F.J. (Ed.),
Uranium Deposits of the World. USA and Latin America. Springer, Berlin,
pp. 357e366. Chapter 9.
Dessau, J.C., Gagnon, F., Levesque, B., Prevost, C., Leclerc, J.-M., Belles-Isles, J.-C.,
2005. Radon in Quebec e Evaluation of the Health Risk and Critical Analysis of
Intervention Strategies. Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec, p. 191.
Available at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/476-RadonInQuebec-
Feuillet.pdf (in French with English summary).
Dostal, J., Capedri, S., 1978. Uranium in metamorphic rocks. Contrib. Minerol. Petrol.
66, 409e414.
Drolet, J.-P., Martel, R., Poulin, P., Dessau, J.-C., Lavoie, D., Parent, M., Levesque, B.,
2013. An approach to define potential radon emission level maps using indoor
radon concentration measurements and radiogeochemical data positive pro-
portion relationships. J. Environ. Radioact. 124, 57e67.
Dyck, W., 1979. Application of hydrogeochemistry to the search for uranium.
Economic Geology Report. In: Hood, P.J. (Ed.), Geophysics and Geochemistry
in the Search for Metallic Ores, 31. Geological Survey of Canada, pp. 489e510.
Dyck, W., 1980. Uranium, radon, helium and other trace elements and gases in well
waters of parts of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, (Ottawa region) Canada.
J. Geochem. Explor. 13, 27e39.
Eby, N., 1984. Monteregian Hills I. Petrography, major and trace element
geochemistry and strontium isotopic chemistry of the western intrusions: Mont
Royal, St. Bruno and Johnson. J. Petrol. 25, 421e452.
Freyer, K., Treutler, H.C., Dehnert, J., Nestler, W., 1997. Sampling and measurement of
radon-222 in water. J. Environ. Radioact. 37, 327e337.
Globensky, Y., 1987. Geologie des Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent, Quebec. Ministere
des Richesses Naturelles du Quebec, p. 63. MM85-02 (in French).
Globensky, Y., 1993. Lexique stratigraphique canadien. In: Region des Appalaches,
des Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent et des Iles de la Madeleine, vol. V-B. Min-
istere de l'Energie et des Ressources et Direction Generale de l'Exploration
geologique et minerale, p. 327. DV 91e23 (in French).
Grasty, R.L., LaMarre, J.R., 2004. The annual effective dose from natural sources of
ionising radiation in Canada. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 108, 215e226.
Graves, B., 1989. Radon, Radium, and Other Radioactivity in Ground Water. Lewis
Publishers Inc., Chelsea.
Han, Y.L., Tom Kuo, M.C., Fan, K.C., Chiang, C.J., Lee, Y.P., 2004. Radon distribution in
groundwater of Taiwan. Hydrogeol. J. 14, 173e179.
Harley, N.H., Robbins, E.S., 1994. A biokinetic model for Rn-222 gas distribution and
alpha dose in humans following ingestion. Environ. Int. 20, 605e610.
Health Canada, 2007. Radon Guidelines. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/
radiation/radon/guidelines_lignes_directrice-eng.php (in English).
Health Canada, 2009. Report on Occupational Radiation Exposures in Canada. In:
Canada Publication 5923, ISBN 978-1-100-12713-2. Cat. H128-1/09-581E.
Hess, C.T., Michel, J., Horton, T.R., Prichard, H.M., Coniglio, W.A., 1985. The occur-
rence of radioactivity in public water supplies in the United States. Health Phys.
48, 553e586.
Horton, T.R., 1983. Methods and Results of EPA's Study of Radon in Drinking Water.
Environmental Protection Agency, ,Washington, DC, p. 29. EPA-520/5-83-027.
Knutsson, G., Olofsson, B., 2002. Radon content in groundwater from drilled wells in
the Stockholm region of Sweden. NGU Bull. 439, 79e85.
Kulich, J., M€ore, H., Swedjemark, G.A., 1997. Radon and Radium in Household Water.
SSI-rapport 88-11. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
(in Swedish).
Lamothe, M., 1989. A new framework for the Pleistocene stratigraphy of the central
St. Lawrence Lowland, southern Quebec. Geogr. Phys. Quat. 43, 119e129.
Larocque, M., Gagne, S., Tremblay, L., Meyzonnat, G., 2013a. Projet de connaissance
des eaux souterraines du bassin versant de la riviere Becancour et de la MRC de
Becancour. Quebec Ministry of Environment, p. 187. PACES Final Report. Avail-
able at: http://www.grobec.org/hydrogeo/pdf/Rapport_synthese_PACES_
Becancour_2013.pdf (in French).
Larocque, M., Meyzonnat, G., Gagne, S., 2013b. Projet de connaissance des eaux
souterraines de la zone Nicolet et de la partie basse de la zone Saint-François.
PACES Final Report. Quebec Ministry of Environment, p. 73 (in French).
Lavoie, D., 2008. Appalachian Foreland Basin in Canada. In: Hsu, K.J., Miall, A.D.
(Eds.), Sedimentary Basins of the World, Sedimentary Basins of the World e
USA and Canada, vol. 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 65e103.
Lavoie, D., Rivard, C., Lefebvre, R., Sejourne, S., Theriault, R., Duchesne, M.J.,
Ahad, J.M.E., Wang, B., Benoit, N., Lamontagne, C., 2013. The Utica Shale and gas
play in southern Quebec: geological and hydrogeological syntheses and
methodological approaches to groundwater risk evaluation. Inter. J. Coal Geol.
126, 77e91.
Leaney, F.W., Herczeg, A.L., 2006. A rapid field extraction method for determination
of radon-222 in natural waters by liquid scintillation counting. Limnol. Oce-
anogr. Methods 4, 254e259.
Leblanc, Y., Legare, G., Lacasse, K., Parent, M., Campeau, S., 2013. Caracterisation
hydrogeologique du sud-ouest de la Mauricie. Quebec Ministry of Environment,
p. 153. PACES Final Report. Available at: http://www.rqes-gries.ca/upload/files/
Rapports/PACES-Phase-1/MAUR_Rap_Vulgarise_28juin.pdf (in French).
Lefebvre, K., Barbecot, F., Ghaleb, B., Larocque, M., Gagne, S., 2013. Full range
determinationof 222
Rn at the watershed scale by liquid scintillation counting.
Appl. Radiat. Isot. 75, 71e76.
Levesque, B., Gauvin, D., McGregor, R.G., Martel, R., Gingras, S., Dontigny, A.,
Walken, W.B., Lajoie, P.,1995. Etude d'exposition au Radon-222 dans les residences
de la Province de Quebec. Centre de Sante Publique de Quebec, p. 55. Report.
Table A1 (continued )
Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222
Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr
ROC02 À71.754 46.296 2.89 131 9.38 1.2 0.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 3
ROC04 À71.846 46.382 8.50 233 9.12 1.1 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3
ROC05 À71.914 46.450 8.68 345 8.40 2.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 6
ROC07 À71.973 46.516 1.97 259 9.29 39.9 1.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 102
ROC09 À72.468 46.326 8.70 1444 8.14 5.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 15
RS01 À73.093 45.951 9.80 9373 6.70 47.9 1.9 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-Cl-SO4 122
SLV001 À72.426 46.492 7.10 e 5.60 4.3 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular e 11
TR001 À72.670 46.371 8.70 e 6.21 3.2 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 8
TR002 À72.602 46.424 7.80 e 6.63 3.6 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 9
TR003 À72.611 46.405 7.50 e 7.15 3.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular e 10
TR004 À72.533 46.376 9.60 e 6.47 3.5 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 9
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217216
Longtin, J.P., 1988. Occurrence of radon, radium, and uranium in groundwater. J. Am.
Water Works Assoc. 80, 84e93.
Lubin, J.H., Boice Jr., J.D., 1997. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta-
analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 89, 49e57.
Lubin, J.H., Boice Jr., J.D., Edling, C., Hornung, R.W., Howe, G., Kunz, E., Kuziak, R.A.,
Morrison, H.I., Radford, E.P., Samet, J.M., Tirmarche, M., Woodward, A., Yao, S.X.,
Pierce, D.A., 1995. Lung cancer in radon exposed miners and estimation of risk
from indoor exposure. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 87, 817e827.
Markkanen, M., Arvela, H., 1992. Radon emanation from soils. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
45, 269e272.
Michel, J., Jordana, M.J., 1987. Nationwide distribution of Ra-228, Ra-226, Rn-222,
and U in groundwater. In: Proceedings of the National Water Well Associa-
tion Conference, April 7e9, 1987, pp. 227e240.
Morland, G., Strand, T., Furuhaug, L., Skarphagen, H., Banks, D., 1998. Radon in
quaternary aquifers related to underlying bedrock geology. Ground Water 36,
143e146.
Murphy, M., Wollenberg, H., Strisower, B., Bowman, H., Flexser, S., Carmichael, I.,
1978. Uranium in Alkaline Rocks. LBNL Paper LBL-7029. US DOE, p. 185.
National Research Council, 1999. Risk Assessment of Radon in Drinking Water.
NationalAcademies Press, Washington, p. 249.
Nazaroff, W.W., 1992. Radon transport from soil to air. Rev. Geophys. 30, 137e160.
Nowamooz, A., Lemieux, J.-M., Therrien, R., 2013. Modelisation numerique de la
migration du methane dans les Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent. Strategic
Environmental Evaluation Committee on Shale gas. Report E3-10, p. 126.
Available at: http://ees-gazdeschiste.gouv.qc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/
uploads/2013/12/Rapport-etude-E3-10_UL.pdf (in French).
Pickler, C., Pinti, D.L., Ghaleb, B., Gardu~no, V.H., Tremblay, A., 2012. Radium deple-
tion and 210
Pb/226
Ra disequilibrium of Marítaro hydrothermal deposits, Los
Azufres geothermal field, Mexico. Geochem. J. 46, 493e504.
Pinti, D.L., Beland-Otis, C., Tremblay, A., Castro, M.C., Hall, C.M., Marcil, J.-S.,
Lavoie, J.-Y., Lapointe, R., 2011. Fossil brines preserved in the St-Lawrence
Lowlands, Quebec, Canada as revealed by their chemistry and noble gas iso-
topes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4228e4243.
Pinti, D.L., Gelinas, Y., Larocque, M., Barnetche, D., Retailleau, S., Moritz, A., Helie, J.-
F., Lefebvre, R., 2013a. Concentrations, sources et mecanismes de migration
preferentielle des gaz d'origine naturelle (methane, helium, radon) dans les
eaux souterraines des Basses- Terres du Saint-Laurent. Strategic Environmental
Evaluation Committee on Shale Gas. Report E3-9, p. 104. Available at: http://
ees-gazdeschiste.gouv.qc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Rapport-
etude-E3-9_Geotop-UQAM.pdf (in French).
Pinti, D.L., Vautour, G., Roulleau, E., Castro, M.C., Sano, Y., 2013b. Helium isotopic
gradients in a catchment basin: constraining groundwater flow patterns and
residence times. Mineral. Mag. 77, 1973 (Abstract).
Roireau, N., Zikovsky, L., 1989. Determination of radon in groundwater of Quebec.
J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 137, 79e85.
Ryder, R.T., 2008. Assessment of Appalachian Basin Oil and Gas Resources: Utica-
Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System, USGS Open-File Report 2008-1287, 52.
Savard, M., Dessau, J.C., Pellerin, E., 1998. Le radon a Oka. Rapport d'intervention de
sante publique. Public Heath commission of Laurentides Region, p. 146. Report.
Available at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/352-radon_rapport.pdf
(in French).
Sejourne, S., Lefebvre, R., Malet, X., Lavoie, D., 2013. Synthese geologique et
hydrogeologique du Shale d'Utica et des unites sus-jacentes (Lorraine, Queen-
ston et dep^ots meubles), Basses- Terres du Saint-Laurent, Quebec. Open-File
Report 7338. Geological Survey Canada, p. 165.
Simard, G., Des Rosiers, R., 1979. Qualite des eaux souterraines au Quebec. Min-
istere de l'Environnement du Quebec, Service des eaux souterraines, p. 161.
H.G.-13.
Soto, J., Fernandez, P.L., Gomez, J., Rodenas, C., 1995. Study of the occurrence of
222
Rn and 226
Ra in drinking water in Spain. Health Phys. 69, 961e965.
Telford, W.M., 1983. Radon mapping in the search for uranium. In: Fitch, A.A. (Ed.),
Developments in Geophysical Exploration Methods, vol. 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam,
pp. 155e194.
Tilsey, J.E., Veldhuyzen, H., Nichols, P.R., 1993. Soil Radon Gas Study of Southern
Ontario. Open File Report 5847. Ontario Geological Survey, p. 148.
Tran Ngoc, T.D., Lefebvre, R., Konstantinovskaya, E., Malo, M., 2014. Characterization
of deep saline aquifers in the Becancour area, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec,
Canada: implications for CO2 geological storage. Environ. Earth Sci. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2941-7.
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1999. Radon in Drinking
Water: Health Risk Reduction and Cost Analysis. Federal Register 64,
Washington.
Vesterbacka, P., M€akel€ainen, I., Arvela, H., 2005. Natural radioactivity in drinking
water in private wells in Finland. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 113, 223e232.
Vinson, D.S., Campbell, T.R., Vengosh, A., 2008. Radon transfer from groundwater
used in showers to indoor air. Appl. Geochem. 23, 2676e2685.
Vinson, D.S., Tagma, T., Bouchaou, L., Dwyer, G.S., Warner, N.R., Vengosh, A., 2013.
Occurrence and mobilization of radium in fresh to saline coastal groundwater
inferred from geochemical and isotopic tracers (Sr, S, O, H, Ra, Rn). Appl.
Geochem. 38, 161e175.
World Health Organization, 2002. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality: Radio-
logical Aspects. Available at: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/
dwq/GDW9rev1and2.pdf.
World Health Organization, 2008. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality [Elec-
tronic Resource]: Incorporating 1st and 2nd Addenda. Recommendations, third
ed., vol. 1, ISBN 978 92 4 154761 1
Wood, W.W., Kraemer, T.F., Shapiro, A., 2004. Radon (222
Rn) in groundwater of
fractured rocks: a diffusion/ion exchange model. Ground Water 42, 552e567.
Zikovsky, L., Chah, B., 1990. The lognormal distribution of radon concentration in
ground water. Ground Water 28, 673e676.
D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 217

More Related Content

What's hot

Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...
Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...
Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS)
 
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimia
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimiaPertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimia
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimiaEko Efendi
 
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine Site
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine SiteIndependent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine Site
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine SiteLOWaterkeeper
 
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...LOWaterkeeper
 
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South AfricaSwartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South AfricaHydrologic Science, llc.
 
Com'è cambiato il Delta del Po
Com'è cambiato il Delta del PoCom'è cambiato il Delta del Po
Com'è cambiato il Delta del PoAlessiaDeMarchi2
 
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della Regione
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della RegioneDelta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della Regione
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della RegioneAlessiaDeMarchi2
 
Saby et al., 2016
Saby et al., 2016Saby et al., 2016
Saby et al., 2016Marion Saby
 
dustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versiondustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versionDustin Weisel
 
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016Gillian Mollod
 
investigative study of seasonal changes
investigative study of seasonal changesinvestigative study of seasonal changes
investigative study of seasonal changesIJAEMSJORNAL
 
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...QUESTJOURNAL
 
Pertemuan 01 produktivity
Pertemuan 01 produktivityPertemuan 01 produktivity
Pertemuan 01 produktivityEko Efendi
 
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...Buzzards Bay Coalition
 
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSEFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSGayathri P
 

What's hot (19)

Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...
Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...
Sanders, Richard: Carbon Cycling along the GB Land Ocean Aquatic Continuum (L...
 
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimia
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimiaPertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimia
Pertemuan 04 eddies dan biogeokimia
 
Sodium
SodiumSodium
Sodium
 
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine Site
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine SiteIndependent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine Site
Independent Review of Hydrological Issues: Deloro Mine Site
 
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...
Swim Drink Fish Canada submission for relicensing written hearing for the Del...
 
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South AfricaSwartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Swartkops estuary, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
 
Com'è cambiato il Delta del Po
Com'è cambiato il Delta del PoCom'è cambiato il Delta del Po
Com'è cambiato il Delta del Po
 
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della Regione
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della RegioneDelta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della Regione
Delta del Po e cambiamento climatico, lo studio della Regione
 
Saby et al., 2016
Saby et al., 2016Saby et al., 2016
Saby et al., 2016
 
dustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versiondustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final version
 
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016
TNC REPORT - Modeling nitrogen source loads on the north shore of LI 03-01-2016
 
investigative study of seasonal changes
investigative study of seasonal changesinvestigative study of seasonal changes
investigative study of seasonal changes
 
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...
Hydrogeochemistry and Microbiology of Wadi Al Bih Limestone Aquifer in Northe...
 
Carbon regeneration in the cariaco basin, venezuela
Carbon regeneration in the cariaco basin, venezuelaCarbon regeneration in the cariaco basin, venezuela
Carbon regeneration in the cariaco basin, venezuela
 
Pertemuan 01 produktivity
Pertemuan 01 produktivityPertemuan 01 produktivity
Pertemuan 01 produktivity
 
Mississippi
MississippiMississippi
Mississippi
 
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...
West Falmouth Nitrogen-Reducing Septic System Demonstration Project - May 201...
 
Carbon regeneration in cariaco basin, venezuela. final
Carbon regeneration in cariaco basin, venezuela. finalCarbon regeneration in cariaco basin, venezuela. final
Carbon regeneration in cariaco basin, venezuela. final
 
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSEFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
 

Similar to Pinti_2014

Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013
Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013
Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013Marcellus Drilling News
 
dustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versiondustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versionDustin Weisel
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015inventy
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015inventy
 
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...NOMADPOWER
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)IJERD Editor
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioHydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioMarcellus Drilling News
 
el yunque poster-1
el yunque poster-1el yunque poster-1
el yunque poster-1Bowen Chang
 
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NY
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NYBaseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NY
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NYMarcellus Drilling News
 
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...Marcellus Drilling News
 
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...Alexander Decker
 
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be0000000c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000Thomas Saunders
 
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resources
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resourcesgas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resources
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resourcesKushank Bajaj
 
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444Anita Carey
 
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community Group
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community GroupUpdate Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community Group
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community GroupChristine A. Waters
 

Similar to Pinti_2014 (20)

Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013
Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013
Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013
 
~Hildenbrand et al ES&T 2015
~Hildenbrand et al ES&T 2015~Hildenbrand et al ES&T 2015
~Hildenbrand et al ES&T 2015
 
dustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final versiondustin major paper-final version
dustin major paper-final version
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015
 
ofr-655
ofr-655ofr-655
ofr-655
 
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...
An Experimental Study on the Migration of Pb in the Groundwater Table Fluctua...
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioHydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
 
el yunque poster-1
el yunque poster-1el yunque poster-1
el yunque poster-1
 
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NY
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NYBaseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NY
Baseline Water Study of 113 Wells in Chenango County, NY
 
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...
Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal s...
 
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...
11.[40 51]correlates in groundwater quality parameters and textural classes o...
 
3D Seismic Refraction
3D Seismic Refraction3D Seismic Refraction
3D Seismic Refraction
 
Moritz-_Methane_baseline
Moritz-_Methane_baselineMoritz-_Methane_baseline
Moritz-_Methane_baseline
 
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be0000000c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
 
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resources
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resourcesgas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resources
gas hydrates Natural hazards or Natural resources
 
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444
GEOSCIENCE 08 Carey et al 437-444
 
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community Group
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community GroupUpdate Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community Group
Update Pamphlet for Hui Aloha O Kiholo Community Group
 
Janin, 2015
Janin, 2015Janin, 2015
Janin, 2015
 

Pinti_2014

  • 1. 222 Rn activity in groundwater of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, eastern Canada: relation with local geology and health hazard Daniele L. Pinti a, * , Sophie Retailleau a , Diogo Barnetche a , Floriane Moreira a , Anja M. Moritz b , Marie Larocque a , Yves Gelinas b , Rene Lefebvre c , Jean-François Helie a , Arisai Valadez a a GEOTOP and Departement des sciences de la Terre et de l'atmosphere, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, CP 8888 Succ. Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montreal, QC, Canada b GEOTOP and Department of Chemistry and Biogeochemistry, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, H4B 1R6 Montreal, QC, Canada c Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE), 490 rue de la Couronne, G1K 9A9 QC, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 27 February 2014 Received in revised form 8 May 2014 Accepted 27 May 2014 Available online Keywords: Radon Radium Groundwater Quebec Mont-Saint-Hilaire Health hazards a b s t r a c t One hundred ninety-eight groundwater wells were sampled to measure the 222 Rn activity in the region between Montreal and Quebec City, eastern Canada. The aim of this study was to relate the spatial distribution of 222 Rn activity to the geology and the hydrogeology of the study area and to estimate the potential health risks associated with 222 Rn in the most populated area of the Province of Quebec. Most of the groundwater samples show low 222 Rn activities with a median value of 8.6 Bq/L. Ninety percent of samples show 222 Rn activity lower than 100 Bq/L, the exposure limit in groundwater recommended by the World Health Organization. A few higher 222 Rn activities (up to 310 Bq/L) have been measured in wells from the Appalachian Mountains and from the magmatic intrusion of Mont-Saint-Hilaire, known for its high level of indoor radon. The spatial distribution of 222 Rn activity seems to be related mainly to lithology differences between U-richer metasediments of the Appalachian Mountains and magmatic intrusions and the carbonaceous silty shales of the St. Lawrence Platform. Radon is slightly enriched in sodium-chlorine waters that evolved at contact with clay-rich formations. 226 Ra, the parent element of 222 Rn could be easily adsorbed on clays, creating a favorable environment for the production and release of 222 Rn into groundwater. The contribution of groundwater radon to indoor radon or by ingestion is minimal except for specific areas near Mont-Saint-Hilaire or in the Appalachian Mountains where this contribution could reach 45% of the total radioactive annual dose. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Radon (222 Rn) is an odorless and colorless radioactive noble gas that occurs naturally in air, water, rocks and soils (e.g., Ball et al., 1991; Cecil and Green, 2000). 222 Rn is an isotope derived from the decay chain of 238 U and more specifically from the a-particle emission decay of U-daughter element 226 Ra adsorbed on soil grains or contained in minerals. Radon itself decays to 218 Po with a half-life of 3.8235 days. The decay of 222 Rn (and its progeny) results in the release of a-particles that are a potential health hazard if radon is inhaled or ingested (National Research Council, 1999). A relationship between lung cancer and inhalation of radon decay products has been demonstrated for underground miners (Lubin et al., 1995) and in domestic environments (houses, schools, etc.) (Lubin and Boice, 1997). Since 1980, when high 222 Rn activities were found in homes throughout the United States, concern has focused on the mecha- nism of 222 Rn enrichment in air. However, the majority of 222 Rn entering homes is produced underground in rocks and soils and is then carried to the surface via gas diffusion or groundwater transport (e.g., Telford, 1983; Nazaroff, 1992). Thus an under- standing of the 222 Rn production, escape and transport in groundwater is of vital importance in predicting health hazards. Radon in groundwater can also contribute, through direct inges- tion, to the indoor annual dose adsorbed by humans (e.g., Vinson et al., 2008). Conclusions from several national studies of radon in public water supplies and groundwater in the United States (e.g., Horton, * Corresponding author. Fax: þ1 514 987 3635. E-mail address: pinti.daniele@uqam.ca (D.L. Pinti). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Radioactivity journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvrad http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.05.021 0265-931X/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217
  • 2. 1983; Hess et al., 1985; Michel and Jordana, 1987; Longtin, 1988) indicate that high radon activity in groundwater occurs in uranium-bearing granite aquifers, in magmatic and metamorphic bedrock aquifers, or when groundwater is present close to fault zones. In the United States, main 222 Rn-prone areas include the Appalachian Mountains, the Rocky Mountains and the Basin and Range (National Research Council, 1999). In Canada, 222 Rn-prone areas are located in terrains favorable to the emanation of radon, such as magmatic and metamorphic rocks of the Canadian Pre- cambrian shield and their products of alteration (Tilsey et al., 1993). In Canada, the harsh climate and the limited ventilation of homes during the winter season enhance the risk for an increased concentration of indoor radon. Voluntary radon surveys in houses were carried out regularly since 1970 (Health Canada, 2009). The latest recommended action level is 200 Becquerel by air cubic meter (Bq/m3 ) for indoor radon (Health Canada, 2007). Extended surveys for soil gas radon in major Canadian urban areas are briefly summarized by Chen et al. (2012). The Geological Survey of Canada carried out detailed studies of radon in ground water since 1980 in Saskatchewan, Ontario and Prince Edwards Island (e.g., Dyck, 1979, 1980). Levesque et al. (1995) carried out a detailed survey for indoor radon in one thousands homes of the Province of Quebec and showed that the Gaspe Peninsula and the Appalachian Mountains regions had the highest222 Rn activities, with averages of 120.8 and 59.7 Bq/m3 respectively. These data were recently updated by Drolet et al. (2013) to define potential radon emission level maps in Quebec. Local surveys in homes of the Mount Oka and Mont- Saint-Hilaire areas, two magmatic intrusions located close to Montreal, showed high 222 Rn activities (18e10,500 Bq/m3 , geo- metric mean of 1245 Bq/m3 in Mount Oka (Savard et al., 1998), and 20e1432 Bq/m3 , geometric mean of 69 Bq/m3 in Mont-Saint- Hilaire (Dessau et al., 2005)). These high values are due to the high U contents in these rocks (Murphy et al., 1978; Savard et al., 1998). Canadian guidelines for radon in groundwater recommend a maximum activity of 2000 Bq/L. This value is much higher than the limits recommended in other countries (100 Bq/L is the suggested value by the World Health Organization, 2008). Roireau and Zikovsky (1989) carried out a radon survey in 50 drinking water wells mainly located in a radius of less than 100 km around Mon- treal and in the north of the “Laurentides” region, where Protero- zoic metamorphic rocks of the Grenville Province outcrop. They measured 222 Rn activities between 0.2 and 439 Bq/L with a mean of 16.9 Bq/L (because the authors did not report all the data, the median or geometric mean cannot be calculated and reported here), and conclude that the measured activities, similar to those found in other countries, did not represent a real hazard to water users. Chah and Zikovsky (1989) carried out 32 radon measure- ments mostly at the same sites as Roireau and Zikovsky (1989). They measured 222 Rn activities between 1.6 and 23.1 Bq/L, except for water samples from the Mount Oka area where the 222 Rn ac- tivities ranged from 48 to 627 Bq/L. Although numerous radon surveys were carried out in the Province of Quebec, most studies do not provide a spatial analysis of the data. This information is important for public health issues. It is also essential when using 222 Rn as a short-term groundwater tracer. This study reports the results of an extensive survey for 222 Rn in groundwater from local municipal and domestic wells in southern Quebec (Pinti et al., 2013a). The spatial distribution of 222 Rn activity in groundwater in relation to the geology and hy- drogeology of the study area and the possible health hazards that 222 Rn levels could generate in the most populated area of the Province of Quebec are discussed. 2. Local geology and hydrogeology The study area covers 15,435 km2 in the St. Lawrence Lowlands, a relatively flat plain between Montreal and Quebec City, delimited by the Appalachian Mountains to the southeast and by the north shore of the St. Lawrence River to the northwest (Fig. 1). This area covers totally or partially four administrative regions: Monteregie, Centre-du-Quebec, Chaudiere-Appalaches and Mauricie. Three geological provinces are represented: the Cambrian-Ordovician St. Lawrence Platform; the Ordovician-Devonian Appalachian Moun- tains; and the Cretaceous magmatic intrusions of the Monteregian Hills (Fig. 1). The St. Lawrence Platform corresponds to a Cambrian-Lower Ordovician siliciclastic and carbonate platform having a maximum thickness of ca. 1200 m, overlain by a minimum of ca. 1800 m of Middle-Late Ordovician foreland carbonate-clastic de- posits (Lavoie, 2008). Geographically, it corresponds to the flat area between Montreal and Quebec City called the St. Lawrence Low- lands. The Ordovician geological units of the St. Lawrence Platform represent a regional fractured rock aquifer tapped by the sampled water wells. The St. Lawrence Platform units of interest in this study are (Fig. 1): (1) the Utica Shale, a fine-grained limy mudstone with organic content between 1 and 1.5% targeted for potential shale gas production (Lavoie et al., 2013). (2) A turbiditic thick succession (up to 3800 m; Globensky, 1987) of mudstones with subordinate alternating sandstone and siltstone of the Lorraine Group. This group is the most exposed unit of the St. Lawrence Platform. (3) Finally, the Queenston Group, consisting of post-orogenic shale, sandstone and conglomerate (Globensky, 1987). The terrains outcropping on the Appalachian Mountains corre- spond to imbricated thrust sheets composed of Cambrian red shales (Shefford Group), followed by alternated dolomitic or calcitic schists, quartzites and phyllades (Bennett, Oak Hill and Caldwell Groups). Ordovician terrains are mainly formed by pyritic or graphitic slates (Stanbridge, Melbourne and Bulstrode formations) to end with black shales alternating with siltstone, sandstone and arkosic greywacke of the Magog Group (Globensky, 1993). A nearly continuous till sheet, overlaid by discontinuous patches of unconsolidated Quaternary sediments made of marine and lacustrine silt and clay of the Champlain Sea (11,200e9800 yrs) and sands deposited during marine regression cover the Cambrian- Ordovician sequence of the St. Lawrence Platform (Lamothe, 1989). The units of the St. Lawrence Platform and the Appalachian Mountains are intruded by nine alkaline Cretaceous magmatic in- trusions, named the Monteregian Hills, one of them, Mont-Saint- Hilaire is located in the study area and composed of gabbro, py- roxenite and a few syenite (Eby, 1984). Most exposed strata in the St. Lawrence Lowlands are sub- horizontal, but are locally affected by mesoscopic open folding such as the Chambly-Fortierville Syncline (Fig. 1). Major structural features in the study area include the Yamaska Fault, one of the many regional normal faults cutting through the basementeplat- form succession and the Logan's Line (Fig.1) a thrust fault that mark the transition between the St. Lawrence Platform and the Appala- chian Mountains. The regional aquifers are located in the fractured bedrock of moderate hydraulic conductivity (~10À6 to 10À5 m/s). They are semi-confined or confined. In general, wells in the fractured bedrock aquifers yield enough water to supply single-family dwellings and, in a few areas, small- to medium-size municipal- ities (Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a,b). Medium- to high- yield aquifers are found in coarse-grained surficial sediments, such as the Quaternary glacio-fluvial or fluvial sediments. In areas close to the St. Lawrence River, most residential wells tap groundwater from the rock aquifer whereas municipal wells tap groundwater D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 207
  • 3. from either the rock or granular aquifers. The main groundwater flow directions in the bedrock aquifers are SEeNW and follow the general topography, with recharge occurring mostly in the Appa- lachian Mountains and discharge to the St. Lawrence River or its main tributaries. Local recharge areas are also distributed in the Lowlands, particularly where the impermeable Champlain Sea clays are absent (Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a,b; Leblanc et al., 2013). Groundwater chemistry shows the occurrence of low-salinity water, dominantly of CaeMgeHCO3 type close to the recharge areas of the Appalachian Mountains. This water evolves into a Na- HCO3 type downstream, probably caused by ion exchange (e.g., Cloutier et al., 2006), with groundwater electric conductivity ranging from 88 to 4466 mS/cm in the study area. Saline ground- water (conductivity from 717 to 31,500 mS/cm) is found in a 10 km wide zone bordering the St. Lawrence River close to the Chambly- Fortierville syncline (Larocque et al., 2013a,b). This saline ground- water becomes clearly brackish in a 2200 km2 area to the north of the Monteregie Est basin where salinity reaches 5 g/L locally (Beaudry, 2013). 3 H-3 He ages of the freshwater end-member indi- cate sub-modern water (2e35 yrs old; Pinti et al., 2013b) in the Becancour area, while uncorrected 14 C activities of the brackish end-member suggest ages of 3000e14,000 years (Beaudry, 2013) corresponding to the Champlain Sea invasion and seawater trap- ping within the clayey Holocene units. 3. Sampling and analytical methods A total of 198 wells (167 domestic/municipality supply wells, 23 drilled observation wells and 8 piezometers) were selected, mostly on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River, with a few located to the north of it (Fig.1). A total of 165 wells tap groundwater from the basal Ordovician fractured bedrock aquifer system whereas 33 wells tap groundwater from sandy Quaternary aquifers. Well depths range from 20 to 225 m. Most of these wells have also been studied as a part of recent groundwater characterization projects Fig. 1. Geological map of the study area with the location of the sampled wells. Positions of main faults and the Chambly-Fortierville Syncline are also drawn. Redrawn from Sejourne et al. (2013). D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217208
  • 4. funded by the Quebec Ministry of Environment (Programme d'acquisition de connaissances des eaux souterraines: acronym PACES). These projects involve sampling and analyses for solute ion contents, trace elements, stable isotopes of water (dD and d18 O) and groundwater residence time indicators using 14 C and 3 H/3 He methods (Larocque et al., 2013a,b; Carrier et al., 2013; Pinti et al., 2013b). In the current study, groundwater was collected at the obser- vation wells using a submersible pump with speed control (Redi- Flo2® ), which prevents significant water degassing. In municipal wells, the water was collected directly at the wellhead and in do- mestic wells at the closest water faucet from the well, taking pre- cautions to avoid intermediate reservoirs where the water could degas. Observation wells and domestic wells were purged a volume equivalent to three times the water volume in the well bore and the water was sampled once the water physico-chemical parameter shad stabilized (pH, T and electric conductivity). Municipal wells, which are continuously pumping, were briefly purged prior to sampling. Radon was collected using 250 cm3 glass bottles by inserting a PVC tube to the bottom and filling with water at con- stant and low flow to avoid degassing. Once filled, the bottle was rapidly sealed with a plastic cap and examined visually for the presence of any air bubble. This is a well-tested field method for sampling radon from water with minimal loss of radon using glass or PET bottles (Leaney and Herczeg, 2006). The bottles were labeled with the time of sampling in order to correct the measured 222 Rn activities of the time lap between field collection and laboratory analyses. The sealed and bubble-free bottles were sent to the radon lab- oratory at Universite du Quebec a Montreal every 2e3 days to measure the 222 Rn activity using a Hidex SL-300 liquid alpha scintillometer. Scintillometer efficiency was first calibrated using international standards. Sampling and analysis protocols were optimized and analytical tests were performed to obtain the best possible accuracy and precision of 222 Rn activity in a continuous interval from 0.5 to 35 Bq/L. Details of the instrument calibration are reported in Lefebvre et al. (2013). Sample preparation (radon concentration) before analysis can be performed following two distinct methods: the direct method (DM) and the extraction method (EM). In the DM method, a cocktail of water and di-isopropyl naphthalene (DIN)-based scintillant is directly prepared in the vial that is inserted in the scintillometer. Counting is performed directly on this mixture after homogenization, but errors on DM measures are generally high (3e10% for 222 Rn activity ranging from 2 to 20 Bq/L; Leaney and Herczeg, 2006). This method is typically used for water ex- pected to exceed 2.5 Bq/L in 222 Rn activity. The extraction method, used for low 222 Rn activity samples, requires more preparation but loss of radon during manipulation is reduced drastically and detection level is lowered to 0.003 Bq/L with an average error of 3% (Leaney and Herczeg, 2006). EM manipulation is as follows: 20e50 cm3 of scintillant are mixed with the entire volume of sampled water (250 cm3 ). Approximately 10 cm3 of air are intro- duced into the glass bottle to facilitate emulsion between water and the scintillant. The cocktail is mixed for 4e5 min and left to stand until phases separate. A volume 8 cm3 of scintillant was then extracted and added to the counting glass vials. During calibration of the method, mean background noise values were smaller than 0.12 Bq/L with an average error of 4% for analysis (Lefebvre et al., 2013). Radon activity results were interpolated with Kriging using ESRI® ArcMap™ 10.1 to create radon distribution maps. The ordi- nary kriging method with “prediction” output and constant “trend” was the most reliable from the statistical point of view to represent the prediction map of the radon activity. The model used for the kriging is the “stable” type with no assumed anisotropy and does not include a nugget effect. 4. Results Radon activities measured in the groundwater wells are re- ported in Table A1 in the Appendix. Measured 222 Rn activities vary from 0.2 to 310 Bq/L, in the same range reported by Roireau and Zikovsky (1989) (see also Fig. 3 for comparison). The histograms shown in Fig. 2 represent the frequency distributions of 222 Rn measured in all groundwater samples and separately for wells located in the Appalachian Mountains and in the St. Lawrence Platform, i.e. the two main geological provinces in the study area. Average 222 Rn activity in the entire study area is 25.2 Bq/L while the wells from the Appalachian Mountains shows a higher average of 31.3 Bq/L compared to an average of 16.1 Bq/Lfor the wells located in the St. Lawrence Platform. The distribution of 222 Rn activities is lognormal (Fig. 2) as usu- ally observed in radon surveys (Zikovsky and Chah, 1990) and, generally, for element distributions in the geosphere (Ahrens, 1965). Median 222 Rn activities are 8.6 Bq/L for the entire dataset, 5.2 Bq/L for wells from the St. Lawrence Platform and 11.9 Bq/L for wells in the Appalachian Mountains. These values are higher than the median values of 2.3 and 3.3 Bq/L reported by Roireau and Zikovsky (1989) and Chah and Zikovsky (1989), respectively. This difference could be related to the size of the dataset and the region covered (198 wells against 50 and 32 wells for Roireau and Zikovsky, 1989 and Chah and Zikovsky, 1989, respectively). Sam- pling a larger number of wells increases the probability of tapping into “anomalous” areas, therefore influencing the median value. The range of 222 Rn activities measured in this study is also similar to that measured in Saskatchewan, Canada by Dyck (1979) and in the United States by Hess et al. (1985) (Fig. 3), though higher activities have been measured in the nearby State of Maine, mainly in U-rich granitic terrains (Brutsaert et al.,1981). High radon activities are characteristics of Nordic countries such as Finland and Fig. 2. Frequency distribution histograms of the 222 Rn activity measured in wells (a) from the entire study area; and those located in (b) the St. Lawrence Platform; and (c) the Appalachian Mountains. D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 209
  • 5. Norway (Fig. 4), because of the large outcrops of granitic terrains belonging to the Fennoscandia Precambrian Shield (e.g., Banks et al., 1998; Morland et al., 1998; Vesterbacka et al., 2005). It was not possible to illustrate the most complete survey ever carried out on Fig. 3 (30,957 wells sampled in Sweden; Knutsson and Olofsson, 2002) because no data tables are reported in this work, but 222 Rn activities as high as 57,000 Bq/L have been measured in U-rich granitic terrains in this study. Fig. 4 presents the radon distribution prediction map in the study area. Results show that higher 222 Rn activities are recorded in two areas, the Mont-Saint-Hilaire and the Appalachian Mountains. 222 Rn activity reaches 233.4 Bq/L in Mont-Saint-Hilaire, a gabbroic intrusion of the Cretaceous Monteregian Hills that is already known for high indoor radon anomalies (20e1432 Bq/m3 ; Dessau et al., 2005). The Appalachian Mountains are also known for high in- door radon activities (58 Bq/m3 ; Levesque et al., 1995). 222 Rn in this region varies from 0.3 to 310 Bq/L. A few restricted areas with relatively high 222 Rn activities (30e97 Bq/L) also occur near the St. Lawrence River. The larger anomaly surrounds the town of Sorel in the northern part of the Monteregie Est region (Fig. 4), and corre- sponds to the 2200 km2 area where brackish groundwater has been found in the fractured rock aquifer confined by thick marine clay (Beaudry, 2013). 5. Discussion 5.1. Expected radon activity in water Both the descriptive statistical treatment and the spatial dis- tribution of 222 Rn activities (Figs. 2 and 4) clearly show that 222 Rn activities recorded in wells located in the St. Lawrence Platform are lower than those recorded in wells located in the Appalachian Mountains. The reason could be simply related to the difference in lithology. Wells in the St. Lawrence Platform collect groundwater from fractured carbonate-shale formations whereas groundwater from the Appalachian Mountains is in contact with graphitic and black shales and metasediments (slates, schists and phyllades) which are expected to contain more uranium than the sedimentary rocks belonging to the St. Lawrence Platform. The concentration of U needed to produce the measured 222 Rn activities can be estimated by simple calculation. The 222 Rn activity in water derives from the radioactive decay of 226 Ra (a daughter element of 238 U) adsorbed on the solid grains or contained in minerals (Cecil and Green, 2000). Thus the 222 Rn activity in water can be estimated from the U content of the rock, and assuming secular equilibrium between 226Ra in the solid phase and 222 Rn in the water phase (25 days; Andrews and Lee, 1979), following the equation modified from, e.g. Bonotto and Caprioglio (2002): ½222 RnŠwater ¼ 12:469$r$ð1 À f=fÞ$ARn$½UŠrock (1) where [222 Rn]water is the radon activity in the liquid phase calcu- lated in Bq/L; r is the bulk density of rock (g/cm3 ); (1 À f/f) is the void ratio (unit less); ARn is the emanation coefficient of radon (unit less) and [U] the concentration of U in the rock (mg/kg). The emanation coefficient is the fraction of the total activity of 222 Rn produced by 226 Ra decay that escapes from the rock to the pores of the medium. The constant 12.496 is the 238 U disintegration rate recalculated to take into account the correct units to convert the final [222 Rn]water to Bq/L (Bonotto and Caprioglio, 2002). The average aquifer porosity and the radon emanation coeffi- cient are the two parameters that are the most difficult to evaluate and they are source of the larger uncertainties. Based on pumping tests, Larocque et al. (2013a) suggest porosities of 1e5% for the fractured Ordovician aquifers around Becancour (Fig.1). Nowamooz et al. (2013) report porosities for the Lorraine shales (the most widespread terrain in the St. Lawrence Lowlands) and the Utica shales of 3.5 ± 1%. Ryder (2008) reports porosities of the Queenston shale of 3e4%. These porosity values are on the order of those measured in Cambro-Ordovician lower sandstone and carbonate unit cores of the St. Lawrence Platform, which vary between 1.22 ± 0.24% and 6.22 ± 0.18% (Tran Ngoc et al., 2014). Cambrio- Ordovician metasedimentary series of the Appalachian Mountains constitute aquifers of poor permeability (Simard and Des Rosiers, 1979) with porosities equivalent to those of the fractured lithol- ogies of the St. Lawrence Platform, or lower. To cover the entire porosity range encountered in the study area, we assume a porosity (f) from 1 to 5%. The emanation coefficient of 222 Rn depends on lithology, temperature and moisture content (e.g., Ball et al., 1991; Nazaroff, 1992). Characteristic emanation coefficients for silty and clayey rocks, which closely relate to the terrains outcropping in the study area, range between 11 and 31% (Markkanen and Arvela, 1992). Using the above values of porosity and emanation coefficients, and assuming secular equilibrium, U contents from 0.2 to 2.2 mg/kg for the rocks of the St. Lawrence Platform and from 0.3 to 2.9 mg/kg for the rocks of the Appalachian Mountains are needed to produce the 222 Rn activities recorded in our water samples. Calculated U contents are in agreement with those estimated by Pinti et al. (2011) for the carbonate-silty facies of the St. Lawrence Platform (0.4e2.0 mg/kg of U) and for the gabbro-pyroxenite-diorite in- trusions of the Monteregian Hills such as Mont-Saint-Hilaire (0.3e2.5 mg/kg U) (Pinti et al., 2011). The U contents in the slate and schistose terrains of the Appa- lachian Mountains are not well known but certainly reach or even exceed the values estimated above for the rocks of the St. Lawrence Platform. Uranium enrichment in these terrains is clearly evidenced by the occurrence of several U mineralizations along the Appala- chians piedmont and highlands, often at the contact with granitic bodies, as observed in Vermont State, USA (Dahlkamp, 2010). A few U anomalies have been discovered by the Canadian Johns-Manville Company in 1968 in the area of Thetford Mines, which is just a few Fig. 3. Range of 222 Rn activity recorded in groundwater in this study compared to those measured in Quebec, Canada, the USA and other countries worldwide (when available, the number of samples is shown on the bar corresponding to each study). References are: Dyck (1979) (Canada); Brutsaert et al. (1981) (Maine); Hess et al. (1985) (USA); Graves (1989) (United Kingdom and Italy); Roireau and Zikovsky (1989) (Quebec [1]); Chah and Zikovsky (1989) (Quebec [2]); Soto et al. (1995) (Spain); Freyer et al. (1997) (Germany); Kulich et al. (1997) (Sweden); Morland et al. (1998) (Norwegian, Quaternary); Banks et al. (1998) (Norwegian, bedrock); Alabdula'aly (1999) (Saudi Arabia); Han et al. (2004) (Taiwan); Vesterbacka et al. (2005) (Finland). D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217210
  • 6. tens of km SE of the highest 222 Rn activity that we recorded in the Appalachian Mountains (Figs. 1 and 4). The general distribution of 222 Rn activity in the study area ap- pears to be closely related to the geology with a clear NEeSW oriented anomalous region corresponding to the Appalachian Mountains and the isolated spot of the Mont-Saint-Hilaire magmatic intrusion (Fig. 4). Other local anomalies, such as those observed close to the St. Lawrence River could be explained by the local geology and hydrogeology. 5.2. Radon distribution: relation with lithology and water chemistry Fig. 5 shows the frequency distribution of the 222 Rn activity for the three most represented rock aquifer types in the area, i.e. the carbonate or silty shales and mudstones occurring mainly in the St. Lawrence Lowlands and some areasin the Appalachians Mountains, and the slate and schist-phyllades occurring in the Appalachian Mountains. The larger 222 Rn anomalies have been detected in groundwater from schist-phyllade aquifers rather than in slate and shales. This behavior could be related to an increased U content in these rocks though there is no known evidence of increasing U Fig. 4. Interpolated spatial distribution of the 222 Rn activity in the study area. The traces of geological unit boundaries and structural features from Fig. 1 are shown in background, including Oak Hill formation for the Appalachian Mountains (dotted area). Fig. 5. Probabilistic density distribution of 222 Rn activities measured in groundwater flowing in: (a) shale, (b) schist-phyllade and (c) slate. D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 211
  • 7. content with the metamorphic grade (e.g., Dostal and Capedri, 1978). Most of the highest 222 Rn activities in groundwater were observed in Oak Hill Group (222 Rn average activity of 18.6 Bq/L and median of 52 Bq/L) (Fig. 4), which is composed of phyllades, quartzites and dolomites. If the 222 Rn activity is plotted against the main groundwater types in the region (Fig. 6), i.e. CaeMgeHCO3, Na-HCO3 and NaeCl (Carrier et al., 2013; Larocque et al., 2013a), the NaeCl type waters show more frequent anomalies in 222 Rn, although not in absolute intensities. Cloutier et al. (2006; 2010) proposed a general model to explain the evolution of groundwater chemistry in a sedimentary rock aquifer located North of the St. Lawrence River. At recharge, freshwater flowing in unconfined aquifers acquires Ca-Mg-HCO3 chemical character by interacting with dolostone and limestone units of the St. Lawrence Platform. This water evolves toward a Na- HCO3 type by Ca2þ eNaþ ion exchange, where Ca2þ water exchanges with Naþ mineral in semi-confined to confined aquifers. Finally, close to the St. Lawrence River, groundwater evolves to a NaeCl type with salinity probably derived from exchange of freshwater with pore seawater trapped into the Champlain Sea clays or the fractured rock aquifers, especially in areas confined by thick marine clay that have limited recharge (Beaudry et al., 2011). Under neutral/alkaline conditions, 226 Ra, the parent element of 222 Rn is rapidly adsorbed on the surface of clay minerals (e.g., Ames et al., 1983; Pickler et al., 2012; Wood et al., 2004; Vinson et al., 2013). The proximity of this sorbed 226 Ra to the active groundwater flow system allows the release of its decay progeny 222 Rn directly to the water phase (Wood et al., 2004). This process could explain why we observe patchy 222 Rn anomalies close to the St. Lawrence River (Fig. 4), where fractured aquifers are often confined by a thick marine clay layers. 5.3. Evaluating health risks from groundwater radon measurements The 222 Rn dissolved in groundwater constitutes a potential risk for human health. Inhalation of radon progeny accounts for about 89% of the risk associated with domestic water use, with almost 11% resulting from direct ingestion of radon in drinking water (USEPA, 1999). The estimation of the increment of airborne 222 Rn in a dwelling, arising from the use of water that contains dissolved radon is a complex problem. It involves the solubility of radon in water, the amount of water used in the dwelling, the volume of the dwelling, and the ventilation rate. The increase in the indoor radon concen- tration due to radon release from indoor water use is described by the transfer coefficient T (unit less): T ¼ DCa Cw (2) where (DCa) is the average increase of the indoor radon concen- tration that results from using water having an average radon concentration of CW. The accepted value of T is 1 ± 0.2 Â 10À4 (National Research Council, 1999). This means that a given activity of 222 Rn in groundwater adds approximately 1/10,000 as much to the radon concentration in the air. As an example, the geometric mean of the 222 Rn activity measured in this study is 10 Bq/L (or 10,000 Bq/m3 ), which means that water could contribute to the total indoor radon by 1 Bq/m3 . The study by Levesque et al. (1995) on indoor radon carried out roughly in the same area as the current study (Monteregie, Lanaudiere, Chaudiere-Appalaches) reports a geometric mean for indoor 222 Rn concentrations of 42.1 to 59.7 Bq/m3 in the building basement and from 15.8 to 26.5 Bq/m3 for the ground floor. This means that 222 Rn from groundwater (median of 8.6 Bq/L all over the study area) might contribute from 1.4 to 5.4% of the total indoor radon. Contribution to indoor radon can be estimated in areas were the 222 Rn activity in groundwater exceeds the 200 Bq/L. At Mont-Saint- Hilaire, the maximum 222 Rn activity measured is 233,400 Bq/m3 of water (233.4 Bq/L), which means that the contribution of 222 Rn dissolved in water to indoor radon could amount to 23.4 Bq/m3 . A survey carried out in 40 homes at Mont-Saint-Hilairein 2001 showed that in 77% of the houses the 222 Rn activity in air was lower than 150 Bq/m3 while for the 20% of them the 222 Rn activity ranged from 150 to 800 Bq/m3 , and only one house showed a very high value (1432 Bq/m3 ) (Dessau et al., 2005). The indoor 222 Rn average activity per home was calculated to be 178 Bq/m3 . This means that radon from groundwater could contribute for 2e3% in the houses showing the highest indoor 222 Rn activities (800e1432 Bq/m3 ). However in houses having indoor radon contents of 150e178 Bq/ m3 or less, the contribution from groundwater radon could be as much as 13e15%. Although not dramatic, this contribution is not negligible. The other radon risk for human health is its direct ingestion by drinking water (USEPA, 1999). The annual effective dose (AED in micro-Sievert per year or mSv/yr) derived from ingestion of radon and its adsorption on the stomach wall can be calculated following the simple equation: AEDðmSV=yrÞ ¼ 222 Rn activityðBq=LÞ Â dose coefficientðSv=BqÞ Â annual water consumptionðL=yrÞ Â 1 Â 106 (3) The dose coefficient, more commonly known as the “equivalent dose to stomach per unit activity of 222 Rn ingested” has been calculated by several authors and ranges between 1.6 Â 10À9 (Harley and Robbins, 1994) to 3.0 Â 10À7 Sv/Bq (Crawford-Brown, 1989). The average accepted value of the dose coefficient for adults is 3.5 Â10À9 Sv/Bq (National Research Council, 1999). Assuming an average drinking water consumption of 730 L/year (World Health Organization, 2002) and a median 222 Rn activity value of 8.6 Bq/L for the entire study area (Fig. 2), we can estimate atotal annual dose of 22.5 mSv/yr through water ingestion. This dose corresponds only to 1.3% of the total annual dose received by Canadians (1769 mSv/yr; Grasty and LaMarre, 2004). However, in areas where 222 Rn activity in groundwater is high, such as Mont- Fig. 6. Probabilistic density distribution of 222 Rn activities measured in (a) Na-HCO3, (b) NaCl and (c) CaeMgeHCO3 groundwater types. D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217212
  • 8. Saint-Hilaire (222 Rn ¼ 233.4 Bq/L; Fig. 4 and Table A1) or in the Appalachian piedmont (222 Rn ¼ 310 Bq/L; Fig. 4), the dose received by direct ingestion of radon ranges from 596 to 793 mSv/yr, i.e. an additional 34e45% of the mean annual dose. This dose becomes more important for small children for which the effective dose coefficient is assumed to be 1 Â10À8 Sv/Bq (National Research Council, 1999). The added dose by drinking water could then reach 96e128% of the average radioactive annual dose. 6. Conclusions Measurements of 222 Rn activity in groundwater from 198 wells between Montreal and Quebec City provided the first distribution map of 222 Rn activity in the shallow exploited aquifers of the most populated region of the Province of Quebec (Fig. 4). Results show that 90% of the wells have 222 Rn activities lower than 100 Bq/L, the maximum concentration limit accepted by the World Health Organization (2008), a few wells spanning between 100 and 310 Bq/L. These anomalous higher values occur in groundwater flowing close to the magmatic intrusion of Mont-Saint-Hilaire and in metasedimentary aquifers of the Appalachian Mountains. At Mont- Saint-Hilaire and in the Appalachian Mountains, 15% of the indoor radon and 45% of the total radioactive annual dose receives contribution from the groundwater radon. The spatial distribution of 222 Rn in the region seems to be related to the lithological characteristics of the terrain in the study area. The next step would be to improve sampling resolution, in particular in the Appalachian Mountains, where the higher anomalies are concentrated (Fig. 4). This is the topic of a com- plementary project aimed at measuring the main physico- chemical parameters of groundwater along with 222 Rn activities in an additional 120 wells in this area, therefore providing more than 200 wells in a smaller area of 3400 km2 . This resolution will be helpful to better understand the role of watererock in- teractions and water mixing in the spatial distribution of radon and to facilitate the use of 222 Rn as a tracer of groundwater in surface water. Acknowledgments We thank the handling editor, Dr. Paul Martin and two anon- ymous reviewers for their fruitful comments. We wish to thank the municipalities and private citizens who allowed collection of water samples for this study. Ch^atelaine Beaudry and Xavier Malet (INRS), Antoine Armandine Les landes (Universite Rennes 1), Mina Ibrahim (Concordia University) and Christine Boucher (GEOTOP) are thanked for their help during sampling. This research was funded by the Quebec Ministry of Environment (Ministere du Developpement durable, de l'Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs) (study EES E3-9) and the Quebec Province Research Funds (FRQ-NT, Fonds de Recherche Quebec e Nature et Technologie) through the program Initiatives Strategiques pour l'Innovation (project no. 163607). Appendix A Table A1 Radon measurements in the study area. Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222 Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr BEC002 À72.079 46.300 9.50 395 7.43 3.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 9 BEC005 À72.078 46.181 9.40 569 7.34 11.5 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 29 BEC007 À72.081 46.400 8.80 252 9.24 11.0 0.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 28 BEC009 À72.007 46.251 9.90 120 7.82 1.7 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4 BEC010 À71.932 46.269 10.40 124 8.08 1.5 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4 BEC014 À71.984 46.446 10.30 640 8.82 4.1 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 10 BEC015 À71.924 46.528 9.20 172 9.19 19.6 0.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 50 BEC016 À71.931 46.487 8.60 202 8.63 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 8 BEC021 À71.951 46.323 11.10 206 8.14 7.0 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 18 BEC028 À72.058 46.113 12.90 335 8.11 12.1 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 31 BEC029 À71.996 46.170 10.10 203 7.81 2.7 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 7 BEC030 À71.936 46.163 10.50 227 8.87 110.6 4.4 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 283 BEC031 À71.920 46.205 8.50 198 8.37 50.3 2.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 128 BEC032 À71.857 46.166 9.40 382 6.79 17.9 0.7 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 46 BEC034 À71.850 46.241 9.50 126 8.02 4.1 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 10 BEC036 À71.789 46.209 12.50 430 7.22 13.8 0.6 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 35 BEC056 À72.248 46.250 10.60 553 8.23 5.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 13 BEC100 À72.073 46.260 10.40 128 8.97 32.1 1.3 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 82 BEC101 À72.168 46.276 9.90 571 9.22 4.5 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 12 BEC102 À72.029 46.489 8.10 283 7.74 42.6 1.7 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 109 BEC103 À72.320 46.148 11.10 351 7.28 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 8 BEC104 À72.257 46.105 8.97 89 8.60 11.9 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 30 BEC105 À72.001 46.364 10.40 158 6.20 5.7 0.2 SL Platform Slate Granular Ca-HCO3 15 BEC106 À72.227 46.368 9.00 44 6.59 3.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 8 BEC107 À72.247 46.215 11.00 131 8.27 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 13 BEC108 À72.410 46.223 8.50 448 7.91 9.5 0.4 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 24 BEC109 À72.151 46.344 9.80 42 5.53 4.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 10 BEC110 À72.501 46.185 8.70 236 8.17 10.5 0.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 27 BEC111 À72.217 46.238 8.60 194 7.34 5.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 13 BEC114 À71.663 46.296 8.00 180 7.48 14.4 0.6 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 37 BEC117 À72.108 46.544 7.50 70 7.00 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 13 BEC119 À72.052 46.509 11.40 205 7.69 18.7 0.7 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 48 BEC120 À72.486 46.191 9.70 315 8.36 7.3 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 19 BEC121 À72.386 46.163 10.30 681 8.46 12.4 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 32 BEC122 À72.380 46.117 9.50 254 8.06 2.6 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7 BEC124 À71.600 46.250 14.80 42 6.53 23.7 0.9 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-HCO3-Cl 60 BEC126 À71.545 46.304 8.90 153 8.06 3.9 0.2 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 10 (continued on next page) D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 213
  • 9. Table A1 (continued ) Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222 Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr BEC127 À71.489 46.274 9.80 91 6.22 101.5 4.1 Appalachians Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 259 BEC130 À71.768 46.175 10.10 506 7.04 2.2 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6 BEC132 À71.699 46.149 9.50 135 6.60 65.5 2.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 167 BEC139 À71.555 46.338 9.50 252 7.86 12.9 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 33 BEC140 À71.606 46.083 9.40 85 6.36 63.8 2.6 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 163 BEC144 À72.455 46.198 10.30 394 7.11 74.4 3.0 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 190 BEC145 À72.425 46.173 11.90 339 7.68 8.7 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 22 BEC147 À71.816 46.347 9.60 150 7.55 13.1 0.5 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-SO4 33 BEC148 À71.772 46.326 8.70 107 8.55 10.2 0.4 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 26 BEC149 À71.803 46.256 9.40 183 8.07 1.6 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 4 BEC201 À71.804 46.573 7.60 e 7.41 8.0 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 20 BEC203 À72.113 46.413 9.80 e 6.20 2.9 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 7 BEC204 À71.980 46.550 8.90 e 8.78 14.2 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 36 CHM001 À72.402 46.439 10.60 e 6.71 3.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 10 INRS MSH À73.154 45.539 8.45 180 8.16 233.4 9.3 SL Platform Gabbro Fractured Na-HCO3 596 INRS P03 À72.912 45.872 8.68 2861 7.09 97.0 3.9 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 248 INRS P06 À72.584 45.675 9.60 288 7.56 2.7 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7 INRS P08 À73.129 45.878 9.61 13527 6.87 84.1 3.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 215 INRS P10 À72.872 45.065 7.36 191 7.36 1.0 0.0 Appalachians Limestone Fractured Ca-HCO3 3 INRS P13 À73.314 45.638 8.91 1722 7.49 32.9 1.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 84 INRS P14 À72.764 45.880 8.93 1000 7.42 7.1 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 18 INRS P23 À73.333 45.368 10.58 2280 8.61 1.1 0.0 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 3 INRS109 À72.770 45.342 9.46 222 7.53 8.5 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 22 INRS115 À72.771 45.224 9.64 191 7.53 1.5 0.1 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 4 INRS129 À72.982 45.563 11.10 1181 8.33 4.1 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 11 INRS131 À72.918 45.692 10.20 276 8.03 3.6 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 9 INRS143 À72.504 45.333 9.81 185 7.21 22.0 0.9 Appalachians Schists Fractured Mg-HCO3 56 INRS149 À72.594 45.575 10.50 154 7.98 7.2 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Mg-HCO3 18 INRS155 À72.439 45.033 10.33 364 6.90 148.5 5.9 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 379 INRS164 À72.361 45.539 9.80 183 7.25 64.8 2.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 165 INRS169 À72.384 45.429 10.68 160 7.55 249.7 10.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 638 INRS177 À73.294 45.501 9.66 677 7.88 6.0 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 15 INRS183 À73.378 45.679 9.89 2956 7.43 3.1 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 8 INRS188 À73.244 45.714 14.04 2912 6.59 0.2 0.0 SL Platform Limestone Fractured Na-Cl 0 INRS199 À72.716 45.484 10.00 292 8.31 71.1 2.8 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 182 INRS210 À72.829 45.546 10.08 363 6.81 2.1 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 5 INRS212 À72.741 45.578 10.70 348 7.99 8.8 0.4 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 23 INRS213 À72.668 45.550 10.80 143 7.97 2.1 0.1 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 5 INRS214 À72.750 45.718 9.50 1141 8.23 0.9 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-Cl 2 INRS221 À73.264 45.391 10.83 462 7.81 37.0 1.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 95 INRS224 À73.240 45.470 11.10 767 9.11 16.1 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 41 INRS227 À73.020 45.474 10.53 216 8.12 9.9 0.4 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 25 INRS232 À73.014 45.287 11.10 387 7.46 1.7 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Ca-HCO3 4 INRS233 À72.993 45.367 11.46 327 6.95 3.4 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 9 INRS234 À73.120 45.347 10.40 531 7.16 5.4 0.2 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Ca-HCO3 14 INRS240 À72.965 45.166 12.59 550 6.83 3.2 0.1 Appalachians Mudstone Granular Ca-HCO3 8 INRS251 À73.398 45.150 10.46 500 6.96 8.8 0.4 SL Platform Limestone Fractured Ca-HCO3 22 INRS256 À73.221 45.200 10.60 337 7.86 1.8 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 5 INRS263 À72.659 45.017 9.89 53 6.33 15.3 0.6 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 39 INRS269 À72.509 45.134 9.21 64 6.37 13.5 0.5 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 34 INRS270 À72.890 45.448 10.98 130 7.71 21.2 0.8 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 54 INRS276 À72.808 45.803 9.50 515 8.50 1.3 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3 INRS278 À73.222 45.284 11.50 329 8.17 2.3 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 6 INRS280 À73.084 45.213 10.20 222 9.00 2.8 0.1 SL Platform Mudstone Fractured Na-HCO3 7 INRS285 À72.676 45.792 12.70 525 7.10 2.5 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6 INRS300 À72.926 45.272 10.00 316 8.32 13.8 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 35 NSF001 À71.925 46.034 13.45 117 7.00 19.5 0.8 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 50 NSF002 À71.924 46.114 9.22 112 7.14 8.6 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 22 NSF003 À72.547 45.973 11.27 592 7.89 2.5 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 6 NSF004 À72.424 45.865 10.88 194 7.98 5.9 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 15 NSF005 À72.387 45.851 9.70 286 8.77 21.6 0.9 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 55 NSF006 À72.475 45.819 9.44 205 8.35 14.7 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 38 NSF007 À72.485 46.063 9.12 216 8.22 8.6 0.3 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 22 NSF008 À72.254 45.986 10.22 291 7.55 5.8 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 15 NSF009 À72.184 45.921 12.00 e 8.15 28.4 1.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured e 73 NSF010 À71.807 46.100 7.64 99 7.67 101.5 4.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 259 NSF011 À71.808 45.979 9.09 88 9.17 30.5 1.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 78 NSF012 À72.089 46.003 9.09 99 8.60 4.8 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 12 NSF013 À72.709 46.025 8.60 118 7.55 6.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 16 NSF014 À72.543 46.097 9.52 e 8.67 11.9 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured e 30 NSF015 À72.424 45.929 10.71 381 9.13 1.7 0.1 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 4 NSF016 À72.495 45.758 9.35 290 7.67 7.2 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 18 NSF017 À72.518 45.818 10.80 202 7.36 49.2 2.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 126 NSF018 À72.680 45.965 9.30 218 7.83 5.5 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 14 NSF019 À72.252 45.865 11.42 161 7.76 3.1 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Mg-HCO3 8 D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217214
  • 10. Table A1 (continued ) Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222 Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr NSF020 À72.343 45.983 8.40 e 7.51 5.5 0.2 Appalachians e Fractured e 14 NSF021 À72.005 45.955 9.90 e 7.49 5.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured e 13 NSF022 À72.091 45.841 8.10 237 7.80 10.4 0.4 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 27 NSF023 À72.338 45.670 8.00 159 7.70 25.8 1.0 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 66 NSF024 À72.677 46.011 10.20 1097 7.96 12.0 0.5 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 31 NSF134 À72.241 45.726 9.40 235 7.74 8.0 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 21 NSF135 À72.295 45.759 8.90 270 6.78 62.3 2.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 159 NSF136 À72.370 45.802 10.20 355 7.46 4.4 0.2 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-Cl 11 NSF137 À72.450 45.907 10.40 280 8.08 6.7 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Na-HCO3 17 NSF138 À72.401 45.878 9.30 155 7.88 1.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3 NSF139 À72.405 45.842 10.20 100 7.91 5.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 13 NSF140 À72.452 45.859 16.90 137 7.37 0.3 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 1 NSF141 À72.570 45.905 10.10 e 7.90 2.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate e e 6 NSF144 À72.617 45.933 10.50 184 8.18 1.8 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 5 NSF145 À72.668 45.955 11.20 351 7.78 3.5 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-HCO3 9 NSF146 À72.702 45.990 10.40 277 6.67 3.1 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 8 NSF147 À72.726 46.026 9.50 1099 8.18 19.6 0.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 50 NSF148 À72.120 45.888 12.20 429 6.84 14.9 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 38 NSF149 À72.205 45.902 10.60 229 7.27 12.3 0.5 Appalachians Slate Granular Na-HCO3 31 NSF150 À72.367 45.971 10.10 234 6.43 12.4 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-Cl 32 NSF151 À72.314 45.941 8.30 156 8.30 8.2 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 21 NSF152 À72.261 45.919 12.00 169 7.75 4.2 0.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 11 NSF153 À72.344 45.995 9.30 317 7.14 11.1 0.4 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 28 NSF157 À72.435 46.105 9.70 40 5.32 14.8 0.6 SL Platform Shale Granular Ca-HCO3 38 NSF158 À72.358 46.060 9.50 234 8.53 8.2 0.3 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 21 NSF165 À71.685 45.886 9.60 312 5.65 168.1 6.7 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 429 NSF166 À71.746 45.911 16.10 366 6.11 116.9 4.7 Appalachians e Granular Na-Cl 299 NSF167 À71.887 45.999 13.00 78 5.80 72.2 2.9 Appalachians Phyllade Granular Ca-HCO3 184 NSF182 À71.788 45.934 9.20 206 7.89 134.6 5.4 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 344 NSF200 À71.653 45.662 8.20 113 5.96 100.4 4.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 257 NSF215 À71.746 45.706 8.90 318 6.50 49.8 2.0 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 127 NSF216 À71.829 45.749 9.80 164 9.80 310.3 12.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 793 NSF217 À71.891 45.780 10.20 165 7.68 35.6 1.4 Appalachians Volcanics Fractured Ca-HCO3 91 NSF218 À71.991 45.812 12.60 230 7.05 4.9 0.2 Appalachians Schists Granular Ca-HCO3 13 NSF219 À71.998 45.852 8.80 120 6.23 3.8 0.2 Appalachians Phyllade Granular Ca-HCO3 10 NSF220 À72.039 45.885 9.10 130 7.83 8.8 0.4 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 22 NSF221 À72.075 45.863 9.40 256 7.29 2.5 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 6 NSF222 À72.403 45.990 10.00 320 8.60 12.6 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 32 NSF223 À72.447 46.021 10.70 349 7.60 14.7 0.6 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 38 NSF224 À72.511 46.052 9.60 1073 7.85 15.6 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 40 NSF225 À72.537 46.087 10.20 224 7.95 15.2 0.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 39 NSF226 À72.050 46.084 11.40 179 8.00 15.9 0.6 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 41 NSF227 À72.129 46.071 10.30 602 8.47 17.8 0.7 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 45 NSF228 À72.177 46.085 10.80 156 7.56 13.2 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 34 NSF229 À72.256 46.059 10.80 176 8.69 13.7 0.5 Appalachians e Fractured Na-HCO3 35 NSF230 À72.314 46.063 9.30 151 7.91 19.3 0.8 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 49 NSF231 À72.314 46.063 9.60 366 7.39 17.4 0.7 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 44 NSF232 À72.889 46.042 10.30 178 7.76 69.3 2.8 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 177 NSF234 À71.704 46.028 10.10 39 5.86 198.7 7.9 Appalachians e Fractured Ca-HCO3 508 NSF240 À71.798 46.183 10.80 578 6.74 14.7 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 37 NSF241 À71.771 46.132 12.00 162 6.35 14.0 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 36 NSF244 À71.866 46.081 9.90 312 7.36 10.3 0.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 26 NSF245 À71.541 45.858 10.50 106 7.30 60.9 2.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 156 NSF247 À71.689 46.058 13.10 71 6.29 5.6 0.2 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 14 NSF268 À72.476 45.820 14.90 177 7.60 7.8 0.3 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 20 NSF269 À72.389 45.852 10.30 302 8.46 16.0 0.6 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 41 NSF270 À72.424 45.865 12.80 161 7.50 3.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 8 NSF271 À72.551 45.975 12.00 652 7.89 2.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 7 NSFPZ2 À72.523 46.027 9.80 197 7.91 5.2 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Ca-HCO3 13 NSFPZ20 À72.518 45.976 8.20 e 8.00 1.3 0.1 Appalachians Slate À e 3 NSFPZ21 À72.518 45.976 9.90 92 6.83 0.6 0.0 Appalachians Slate Granular Ca-HCO3 2 NSFPZ3 À72.519 46.006 10.90 396 7.50 1.7 0.1 SL Platform Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 4 NSFPZ6 À72.010 46.089 10.50 397 7.27 6.7 0.3 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 17 NSFPZ7P À72.036 46.088 12.00 e 6.40 8.4 0.3 Appalachians e e e 22 NSFPZ7S À72.070 46.081 12.00 108 6.40 31.5 1.3 Appalachians e Granular Ca-HCO3 80 NSFPZ8 À71.759 45.766 9.10 258 6.61 105.0 4.2 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 268 NSFR1 À72.725 46.141 8.70 18044 8.10 7.9 0.3 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-Cl 20 NSFR2 À72.097 46.013 15.00 127 7.85 10.4 0.4 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 27 NSFR3-2 À71.699 45.686 11.50 138 7.13 147.9 5.9 Appalachians Schists Fractured Ca-HCO3 378 NSFR4 À72.398 45.848 8.06 241 8.06 0.7 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 2 NSFR5 À72.045 45.789 10.20 217 7.72 11.5 0.5 Appalachians Slate Fractured Ca-HCO3 29 NSFR6 À71.821 45.865 9.60 3923 7.63 123.8 5.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-Cl 316 NSFR8-1 À72.528 46.155 9.40 6183 7.25 60.8 2.4 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-SO4 155 ROC01 À71.618 46.201 8.50 47 5.99 66.4 2.7 Appalachians Phyllade Fractured Ca-HCO3 170 (continued on next page) D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 215
  • 11. References Alabdula'aly, A., 1999. Occurrence of radon in the central region groundwater of Saudi Arabia. J. Environ. Radioact. 44, 85e95. Ames, L.L., McGarrah, J.E., Walker, B.A., 1983. Sorption of trace constituents from aqueous solutions onto secondary minerals. II. Radium. Clay Clay Mineral. 31, 335e342. Andrews, J.N., Lee, D.J., 1979. Inert gases in groundwater from the Bunter Sandstone of England as indicators of age and palaeoclimatic trends. J. Hydrol. 41, 233e252. Ahrens, L.H., 1965. Distribution of Elements in Our Planet. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 110. Ball, T.K., Cameron, D.G., Colman, T.B., Roberts, P.D., 1991. Behaviour of radon in the geological environment: a review. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 24, 169e182. Banks, D., Frengstad, B., Midtgård, A.K., Krog, J.R., Strand, T., 1998. The chemistry ofNorwegian groundwaters. I. The distribution of radon, major and minor ele- ments in 1604 crystalline bedrock groundwaters. Sci. Total Environ. 222, 71e91. Beaudry, C., Malet, X., Lefebvre, R., Rivard, C., 2011. Delimitation des eaux sou- terraines saum^atres en Monteregie Est, Quebec, Canada. Geological Survey CanadaOpen File Report 6970. Available at: http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/fr/nrcan- rncan/ess-sst/bfea4c4c-aca8-5fc5-9b22-7aefb31eb245.html (in French). Beaudry, C., 2013. Hydrogeochimie de l'aquifere rocheux regional en Monteregie est, Quebec. M.Sc. thesis. Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), Quebec, Canada, p. 196. Available at: http://espace.inrs.ca/1363/ (in French). Bonotto, D.M., Caprioglio, L., 2002. Radon in groundwaters from Guarany aquifer, South America: environmental and exploration implications. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 57, 931e940. Brutsaert, W.F., Norton, S.A., Hess, C.T., Williams, J.S., 1981. Geologic and hydrologic factors controlling radon-222 in ground waterin Maine. Ground Water19, 407e417. Carrier, M.-A., Lefebvre, R., Rivard, C., et al., 2013. Portrait des ressources en eau souterraine en Monteregie Est, Quebec, Canada. Final Report INRS R-1412. Available at. http://espace.inrs.ca/1639/ (in French). Cecil, D.L., Green, J., 2000. Radon-222. In: Cook, P., Herczeg, A.L. (Eds.), Environ- mental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dor- drecht, the Netherlands, 175e194. Chah, B., Zikovsky, L., 1989. A new method for the determination of radon in water by scintillation in ortho-xylene. Rev. Sci. Eau 3, 343e354. Chen, J., Moir, D., MacLellan, K., Leigh, E., Nunez, D., Murphy, S., Ford, K., 2012. Soil radon measurements in the Canadian cities. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 151, 172e174. Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M.M., Bourque, E., Therrien, R., 2006. Hydro- geochemistry and groundwater origin of the Basses-Laurentides sedimentary rock aquifer system, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, Canada. Hydrogeol. J. 14, 573e590. Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M.M., Therrien, R., 2010. Desalination of a sedi- mentary rock aquifer system invaded by Pleistocene Champlain Sea water and processes controlling groundwater geochemistry. Environ. Earth Sci. 59, 977e994. Crawford-Brown, D.J., 1989. The biokinetics and dosimetry of radon-222 in the human body following ingestion of ground water. Environ. Geochem. Health 11, 10e17. Dahlkamp, F.J., 2010. Appalachian Highlands and Piedmont. In: Dahlkamp, F.J. (Ed.), Uranium Deposits of the World. USA and Latin America. Springer, Berlin, pp. 357e366. Chapter 9. Dessau, J.C., Gagnon, F., Levesque, B., Prevost, C., Leclerc, J.-M., Belles-Isles, J.-C., 2005. Radon in Quebec e Evaluation of the Health Risk and Critical Analysis of Intervention Strategies. Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec, p. 191. Available at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/476-RadonInQuebec- Feuillet.pdf (in French with English summary). Dostal, J., Capedri, S., 1978. Uranium in metamorphic rocks. Contrib. Minerol. Petrol. 66, 409e414. Drolet, J.-P., Martel, R., Poulin, P., Dessau, J.-C., Lavoie, D., Parent, M., Levesque, B., 2013. An approach to define potential radon emission level maps using indoor radon concentration measurements and radiogeochemical data positive pro- portion relationships. J. Environ. Radioact. 124, 57e67. Dyck, W., 1979. Application of hydrogeochemistry to the search for uranium. Economic Geology Report. In: Hood, P.J. (Ed.), Geophysics and Geochemistry in the Search for Metallic Ores, 31. Geological Survey of Canada, pp. 489e510. Dyck, W., 1980. Uranium, radon, helium and other trace elements and gases in well waters of parts of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, (Ottawa region) Canada. J. Geochem. Explor. 13, 27e39. Eby, N., 1984. Monteregian Hills I. Petrography, major and trace element geochemistry and strontium isotopic chemistry of the western intrusions: Mont Royal, St. Bruno and Johnson. J. Petrol. 25, 421e452. Freyer, K., Treutler, H.C., Dehnert, J., Nestler, W., 1997. Sampling and measurement of radon-222 in water. J. Environ. Radioact. 37, 327e337. Globensky, Y., 1987. Geologie des Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent, Quebec. Ministere des Richesses Naturelles du Quebec, p. 63. MM85-02 (in French). Globensky, Y., 1993. Lexique stratigraphique canadien. In: Region des Appalaches, des Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent et des Iles de la Madeleine, vol. V-B. Min- istere de l'Energie et des Ressources et Direction Generale de l'Exploration geologique et minerale, p. 327. DV 91e23 (in French). Grasty, R.L., LaMarre, J.R., 2004. The annual effective dose from natural sources of ionising radiation in Canada. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 108, 215e226. Graves, B., 1989. Radon, Radium, and Other Radioactivity in Ground Water. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea. Han, Y.L., Tom Kuo, M.C., Fan, K.C., Chiang, C.J., Lee, Y.P., 2004. Radon distribution in groundwater of Taiwan. Hydrogeol. J. 14, 173e179. Harley, N.H., Robbins, E.S., 1994. A biokinetic model for Rn-222 gas distribution and alpha dose in humans following ingestion. Environ. Int. 20, 605e610. Health Canada, 2007. Radon Guidelines. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/ radiation/radon/guidelines_lignes_directrice-eng.php (in English). Health Canada, 2009. Report on Occupational Radiation Exposures in Canada. In: Canada Publication 5923, ISBN 978-1-100-12713-2. Cat. H128-1/09-581E. Hess, C.T., Michel, J., Horton, T.R., Prichard, H.M., Coniglio, W.A., 1985. The occur- rence of radioactivity in public water supplies in the United States. Health Phys. 48, 553e586. Horton, T.R., 1983. Methods and Results of EPA's Study of Radon in Drinking Water. Environmental Protection Agency, ,Washington, DC, p. 29. EPA-520/5-83-027. Knutsson, G., Olofsson, B., 2002. Radon content in groundwater from drilled wells in the Stockholm region of Sweden. NGU Bull. 439, 79e85. Kulich, J., M€ore, H., Swedjemark, G.A., 1997. Radon and Radium in Household Water. SSI-rapport 88-11. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish). Lamothe, M., 1989. A new framework for the Pleistocene stratigraphy of the central St. Lawrence Lowland, southern Quebec. Geogr. Phys. Quat. 43, 119e129. Larocque, M., Gagne, S., Tremblay, L., Meyzonnat, G., 2013a. Projet de connaissance des eaux souterraines du bassin versant de la riviere Becancour et de la MRC de Becancour. Quebec Ministry of Environment, p. 187. PACES Final Report. Avail- able at: http://www.grobec.org/hydrogeo/pdf/Rapport_synthese_PACES_ Becancour_2013.pdf (in French). Larocque, M., Meyzonnat, G., Gagne, S., 2013b. Projet de connaissance des eaux souterraines de la zone Nicolet et de la partie basse de la zone Saint-François. PACES Final Report. Quebec Ministry of Environment, p. 73 (in French). Lavoie, D., 2008. Appalachian Foreland Basin in Canada. In: Hsu, K.J., Miall, A.D. (Eds.), Sedimentary Basins of the World, Sedimentary Basins of the World e USA and Canada, vol. 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 65e103. Lavoie, D., Rivard, C., Lefebvre, R., Sejourne, S., Theriault, R., Duchesne, M.J., Ahad, J.M.E., Wang, B., Benoit, N., Lamontagne, C., 2013. The Utica Shale and gas play in southern Quebec: geological and hydrogeological syntheses and methodological approaches to groundwater risk evaluation. Inter. J. Coal Geol. 126, 77e91. Leaney, F.W., Herczeg, A.L., 2006. A rapid field extraction method for determination of radon-222 in natural waters by liquid scintillation counting. Limnol. Oce- anogr. Methods 4, 254e259. Leblanc, Y., Legare, G., Lacasse, K., Parent, M., Campeau, S., 2013. Caracterisation hydrogeologique du sud-ouest de la Mauricie. Quebec Ministry of Environment, p. 153. PACES Final Report. Available at: http://www.rqes-gries.ca/upload/files/ Rapports/PACES-Phase-1/MAUR_Rap_Vulgarise_28juin.pdf (in French). Lefebvre, K., Barbecot, F., Ghaleb, B., Larocque, M., Gagne, S., 2013. Full range determinationof 222 Rn at the watershed scale by liquid scintillation counting. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 75, 71e76. Levesque, B., Gauvin, D., McGregor, R.G., Martel, R., Gingras, S., Dontigny, A., Walken, W.B., Lajoie, P.,1995. Etude d'exposition au Radon-222 dans les residences de la Province de Quebec. Centre de Sante Publique de Quebec, p. 55. Report. Table A1 (continued ) Sample name X coordinates Y coordinates TC TDS mg/L pH 222 Rn Bq/L ± Geological Province Lithology Aquifer Chemistry AED mSv/yr ROC02 À71.754 46.296 2.89 131 9.38 1.2 0.0 Appalachians e Fractured Na-SO4 3 ROC04 À71.846 46.382 8.50 233 9.12 1.1 0.0 Appalachians Slate Fractured Na-HCO3 3 ROC05 À71.914 46.450 8.68 345 8.40 2.3 0.1 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 6 ROC07 À71.973 46.516 1.97 259 9.29 39.9 1.6 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 102 ROC09 À72.468 46.326 8.70 1444 8.14 5.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Fractured Na-HCO3 15 RS01 À73.093 45.951 9.80 9373 6.70 47.9 1.9 SL Platform Shale Granular Na-Cl-SO4 122 SLV001 À72.426 46.492 7.10 e 5.60 4.3 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular e 11 TR001 À72.670 46.371 8.70 e 6.21 3.2 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 8 TR002 À72.602 46.424 7.80 e 6.63 3.6 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 9 TR003 À72.611 46.405 7.50 e 7.15 3.9 0.2 SL Platform Shale Granular e 10 TR004 À72.533 46.376 9.60 e 6.47 3.5 0.1 SL Platform Shale Granular e 9 D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217216
  • 12. Longtin, J.P., 1988. Occurrence of radon, radium, and uranium in groundwater. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 80, 84e93. Lubin, J.H., Boice Jr., J.D., 1997. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta- analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 89, 49e57. Lubin, J.H., Boice Jr., J.D., Edling, C., Hornung, R.W., Howe, G., Kunz, E., Kuziak, R.A., Morrison, H.I., Radford, E.P., Samet, J.M., Tirmarche, M., Woodward, A., Yao, S.X., Pierce, D.A., 1995. Lung cancer in radon exposed miners and estimation of risk from indoor exposure. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 87, 817e827. Markkanen, M., Arvela, H., 1992. Radon emanation from soils. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 45, 269e272. Michel, J., Jordana, M.J., 1987. Nationwide distribution of Ra-228, Ra-226, Rn-222, and U in groundwater. In: Proceedings of the National Water Well Associa- tion Conference, April 7e9, 1987, pp. 227e240. Morland, G., Strand, T., Furuhaug, L., Skarphagen, H., Banks, D., 1998. Radon in quaternary aquifers related to underlying bedrock geology. Ground Water 36, 143e146. Murphy, M., Wollenberg, H., Strisower, B., Bowman, H., Flexser, S., Carmichael, I., 1978. Uranium in Alkaline Rocks. LBNL Paper LBL-7029. US DOE, p. 185. National Research Council, 1999. Risk Assessment of Radon in Drinking Water. NationalAcademies Press, Washington, p. 249. Nazaroff, W.W., 1992. Radon transport from soil to air. Rev. Geophys. 30, 137e160. Nowamooz, A., Lemieux, J.-M., Therrien, R., 2013. Modelisation numerique de la migration du methane dans les Basses-Terres du Saint-Laurent. Strategic Environmental Evaluation Committee on Shale gas. Report E3-10, p. 126. Available at: http://ees-gazdeschiste.gouv.qc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/ uploads/2013/12/Rapport-etude-E3-10_UL.pdf (in French). Pickler, C., Pinti, D.L., Ghaleb, B., Gardu~no, V.H., Tremblay, A., 2012. Radium deple- tion and 210 Pb/226 Ra disequilibrium of Marítaro hydrothermal deposits, Los Azufres geothermal field, Mexico. Geochem. J. 46, 493e504. Pinti, D.L., Beland-Otis, C., Tremblay, A., Castro, M.C., Hall, C.M., Marcil, J.-S., Lavoie, J.-Y., Lapointe, R., 2011. Fossil brines preserved in the St-Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, Canada as revealed by their chemistry and noble gas iso- topes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4228e4243. Pinti, D.L., Gelinas, Y., Larocque, M., Barnetche, D., Retailleau, S., Moritz, A., Helie, J.- F., Lefebvre, R., 2013a. Concentrations, sources et mecanismes de migration preferentielle des gaz d'origine naturelle (methane, helium, radon) dans les eaux souterraines des Basses- Terres du Saint-Laurent. Strategic Environmental Evaluation Committee on Shale Gas. Report E3-9, p. 104. Available at: http:// ees-gazdeschiste.gouv.qc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Rapport- etude-E3-9_Geotop-UQAM.pdf (in French). Pinti, D.L., Vautour, G., Roulleau, E., Castro, M.C., Sano, Y., 2013b. Helium isotopic gradients in a catchment basin: constraining groundwater flow patterns and residence times. Mineral. Mag. 77, 1973 (Abstract). Roireau, N., Zikovsky, L., 1989. Determination of radon in groundwater of Quebec. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 137, 79e85. Ryder, R.T., 2008. Assessment of Appalachian Basin Oil and Gas Resources: Utica- Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System, USGS Open-File Report 2008-1287, 52. Savard, M., Dessau, J.C., Pellerin, E., 1998. Le radon a Oka. Rapport d'intervention de sante publique. Public Heath commission of Laurentides Region, p. 146. Report. Available at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/352-radon_rapport.pdf (in French). Sejourne, S., Lefebvre, R., Malet, X., Lavoie, D., 2013. Synthese geologique et hydrogeologique du Shale d'Utica et des unites sus-jacentes (Lorraine, Queen- ston et dep^ots meubles), Basses- Terres du Saint-Laurent, Quebec. Open-File Report 7338. Geological Survey Canada, p. 165. Simard, G., Des Rosiers, R., 1979. Qualite des eaux souterraines au Quebec. Min- istere de l'Environnement du Quebec, Service des eaux souterraines, p. 161. H.G.-13. Soto, J., Fernandez, P.L., Gomez, J., Rodenas, C., 1995. Study of the occurrence of 222 Rn and 226 Ra in drinking water in Spain. Health Phys. 69, 961e965. Telford, W.M., 1983. Radon mapping in the search for uranium. In: Fitch, A.A. (Ed.), Developments in Geophysical Exploration Methods, vol. 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 155e194. Tilsey, J.E., Veldhuyzen, H., Nichols, P.R., 1993. Soil Radon Gas Study of Southern Ontario. Open File Report 5847. Ontario Geological Survey, p. 148. Tran Ngoc, T.D., Lefebvre, R., Konstantinovskaya, E., Malo, M., 2014. Characterization of deep saline aquifers in the Becancour area, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, Canada: implications for CO2 geological storage. Environ. Earth Sci. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2941-7. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1999. Radon in Drinking Water: Health Risk Reduction and Cost Analysis. Federal Register 64, Washington. Vesterbacka, P., M€akel€ainen, I., Arvela, H., 2005. Natural radioactivity in drinking water in private wells in Finland. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 113, 223e232. Vinson, D.S., Campbell, T.R., Vengosh, A., 2008. Radon transfer from groundwater used in showers to indoor air. Appl. Geochem. 23, 2676e2685. Vinson, D.S., Tagma, T., Bouchaou, L., Dwyer, G.S., Warner, N.R., Vengosh, A., 2013. Occurrence and mobilization of radium in fresh to saline coastal groundwater inferred from geochemical and isotopic tracers (Sr, S, O, H, Ra, Rn). Appl. Geochem. 38, 161e175. World Health Organization, 2002. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality: Radio- logical Aspects. Available at: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/ dwq/GDW9rev1and2.pdf. World Health Organization, 2008. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality [Elec- tronic Resource]: Incorporating 1st and 2nd Addenda. Recommendations, third ed., vol. 1, ISBN 978 92 4 154761 1 Wood, W.W., Kraemer, T.F., Shapiro, A., 2004. Radon (222 Rn) in groundwater of fractured rocks: a diffusion/ion exchange model. Ground Water 42, 552e567. Zikovsky, L., Chah, B., 1990. The lognormal distribution of radon concentration in ground water. Ground Water 28, 673e676. D.L. Pinti et al. / Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 136 (2014) 206e217 217