Many sustainability officers are stretched thin by their duties, which includes a heavy workload of measuring and reporting data, both internally and externally. Despite this potential drawback, data is not the enemy of sustainability leaders. In fact, data and sustainability can go hand-in-hand as you build your case and outline opportunities for future improvements.
In this presentation, you'll learn:
- How data can help you overcome industry trends and make a difference on campus
- Ways data can build constituency around sustainability goals
- The value of verified data & peer context
- How reporting burdens can be eased
Data & Sustainability: How the Right Data Creates Success
1. Wheaton College (MA)
Whitworth University
Widener University
Wilkes University
Williams College
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester State College
Wright State University
Xavier University
Yeshiva University
Youngstown State University
Data and Sustainability:
How the Right Data Creates Success
2. 2
Introduction and Agenda
Webinar Host:
Heather Finnegan
The Challenges of a
Sustainability Professional
Case Studies
Using GHG Inventory Data to
make the case for change
Communicating STARS
results to stakeholders
Creating an actionable
Sustainability Plan
Questions/Discussion
Agenda:
3. Feel Free to Start a Dialogue with Our Presenters
Enter questions in the box at any time. We want to hear from you!
Enter questions
here at any
point during the
webinar
Presentation slides
and webinar
recording will be
sent to each
attendee following
todayâs session
3
5. What are your Pressure Points?
5
Not enough
time!
Lack of
âbuy-inâ
Competing
Priorities
6. Benchmarking Case Study
Sustainability
Benchmarking
GHG Inventory and
Analysis
Benchmarking for
60+ Additional
Metrics
Sustainability
Reporting
Completed STARS
Report Card
Strategic
Recommendations
to Improve
Performance
Sustainability
Planning
Campus-Wide
Stakeholder
Engagement
Published
Sustainability or
Climate Action Plan
6
Senior Level Presentations
7. 7
The Challenge of Validated Data
Providing a consistent and quality data set for benchmarking
âLooking at current [ACUPCC] reports, there are countless errors and
problemsâ
- Carnegie Mellon University Researchers
âą Likely the reporters are not aware of these issues
âą Systems are not designed to notice errors
âą Questions feasibility of benchmarking reported data
Second Nature Reporting Site Disclaimer:
What the Researchers Say:
Through the Sightlines âQVQâ process, institutions have the ability to
compare with confidence and report without reservations
9. Only Half of Env/Mech Target Funded
Spending should be directed toward envelope/mechanical targets
10
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
PercentageofTargetFunded
Breakout of Target Funding
Env/Mech Target:
$9.1 million
Sp/Prog Target:
$4.1 million
Envelope/Mechanical Space/Program
10. Beautiful Space, but Mechanical Rooms in Need
11
3.36
4.19
0 1 2 3 4 5
Example
Peers
Mechanical Room Inspection Score
11. Over Half of Expenses go to HVAC Outsourcing
12
HVAC
51%
Building
Maintenance
24%
Custodial
16%
Admin
1%
Utilities
0.2%
Grounds
8%
2015 Expense Mix
HVAC expenses have increased by $1/GSF â
this is an additional $2 million in costs.
HVAC
21%
Building
Maintenance
32%
Custodial
23%
Admin
4%
Utilities
7%
Grounds
13%
2006 Expense Mix
HVAC expenses have increased, but with no drop in people costs
12. Increase in Spending Outpaces Peers
13
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
2006 2015
$/GSF
Example Operating Actuals
Daily Service PM Utilities Inflation
Utilities
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
2006 2015
Peer Operating Actuals
Utilities
While peers stabilize, Example has increased all areas of its operating budget
13. Reporting Case Study
Sustainability
Benchmarking
GHG Inventory and
Analysis
Benchmarking for
60+ Additional
Metrics
Sustainability
Reporting
Completed STARS
Report Card
Strategic
Recommendations
to Improve
Performance
Sustainability
Planning
Campus-Wide
Stakeholder
Engagement
Published
Sustainability or
Climate Action Plan
14
Senior Level Presentations
14. 15
Challenges of STARS Reporting System
What the Campus Users are Say:
2015 AASHE Membership Survey
15. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Buildings Energy Air & Climate Waste Water Dining Purchasing Grounds Transportation
Points
STARS Operations Performance
Estimated Points Earned Points Remaining Campuses with Similar Enrollment
Performance By Category
16
16. Successes
-1%
-26% -25%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
Space Energy Use
(MMBTU)
MMBTU / GSF
%Change
Energy Profile
FY15 indexed to FY11 baseline
Other successes:
âą Estimated 0.2% of energy consumption
generated from on-campus solar
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Energy Consumption
BTU/GSF/Degreeday
Example
University
Performance Against
STARS Threshold