3. âInformation Literacy (IL) involves the
processes, strategies, skills,
competencies, expertise and ways of
thinking which enable individuals to engage
with information to learn across a range of platforms,
transform the known, and discover the
unknown.â
6. He aha te mea nui o te ao
What is the most important thing in the world?
He tangata, he tangata, he tangata
It is the people, it is the people, it is the people
18. âWorking with our library staff enabled students
to access a wide rangeof information
in our library I didnât even know existed.
Not only (the) resources and texts we had on site,
but also external, digitalsources of
information.â
23. References
Education Review Office (2005). Student Learning in the information landscape. ERO: Wellington, NZ.
Feekery, A. (2017, May 4). The Feekery information literacy model. [web log post] Retrieved from
https://informationliteracyspaces.wordpress.com/2017/05/04/the-feekery-information-literacy-model/
Information Literacy Spaces. About the project. Retrieved from
https://informationliteracyspaces.wordpress.com/about/
Secker, J. (2012, October 12). ANCIL seminar at LSE. Retrieved from
https://newcurriculum.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/ancil-seminar-at-lse/
Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. Transforming information literacy space(s) to support student
learning. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-progress/cross-sector/transforming-
information-literacy-spaces-support
White, S. (2018, May 7). Collaborative planning. [web log post] Retrieved from
https://sengawhite.nz/2018/05/07/collaborative-planning/
White, S. (2012). Keys to effective collaboration, SLANZA, 7, 14-15
Hinweis der Redaktion
Give our mihis and introduce ourselves
Team of secondary & tertiary librarians, teachers & researchers
working with 7 schools & 4 tertiary institutions from Northland to Southland.
2nd of 3 year TLRI funded research project
Aims:
Improve studentsâ IL competencies & learning across the senior secondary & tertiary sectors.
To what extent teacher-librarian collaborative partnerships enhance student learning outcomes in the area of ILS
Two elements to our research â 1 is student learning and ILS â 2 is the focus of this part of the research, which is the extent collaboration between teachers and librarians will impact that learning
Following the only comprehensive survey of school libraries in NZ (ERO 2005) results showed
30% secondary school libraries were not effective in enabling students to connect with the information landscape (NLNZ & MOE publication 2002)
47% not set up to effectively support IL develop.
Series of causes including
Patterns of poor staffing â including employment of unqualified staff
Poor planning â lack of vision & strategic direction
Disconnect between teachers and the library
QUOTE FROM ERO:
âIn many schools where the library infrastructure and resources were set up to support IL, effective links were not being made between the library and the schoolâs teaching and learning programmesâ
Talk about where we see this in the secondary sector - in education and most specifically in our collaboration
Year 1 - Gathering Data - Literature review, Surveys, Rubrics
Year 2 - Action Research partnerships
Year 3 - Building on partnerships - increasing them in project schools - literacy progressions
We will gather specific data related collaborations in our schools including:
Interviews with teachers, librarians and students
Evaluative survey data
Copies of assessments
IL Rubric data from students in Y12 & 13 â pre and post IL interventions (Terms 1 & 3)
Data set comprised answers to series of open-ended questions in TWO nationwide 2017 surveys
Designed to establish comprehensive view how school library & library services understood & positioned in NZ
73 librarians â 69 teachers
Responses in each category were quantified and each theme analysed in further depth
Success â Teachers
Resources of the physical library space - (layout â computers â WIFI â staffing â budget)
Positive attitude of the librarian towards students & staff - (helpfulness - thinking ahead - being pro-active)
Success â Librarians
communication
building relationships & trust with specific teachers and depts.
Multi-faceted approach to success â often linked to teacher attitudes and attributing value to librarian
Barriers to success â teachers â Resources
Barriers to success â librarians - Multi-faceted across the board
Important - findings in no way suggest that teachers do not value the library.
Quite the contrary: teachers who responded placed great deal of value on supportive, helpful librarians, & many expressed considerable frustration at what they saw as under-funding of a significant teaching & learning resource/space.
Almost all showed positive attitudes to the library.
Results reinforced what the librarians were telling us
Significant drivers of practice that are hard to shift
Inconsistent approach
Quals important
Misunderstanding about the purpose of libraries
Funding crucial
But teachersâ beliefs positioned the library as a resource (space, IT services, staffing)
If teachers only see librarians as âhelpfulâ and not as professionals with complementary skills then library will continue to be only a satellite to the real business of teaching and learning instead of the centre of school life and learning programmes.
Points about collaborative practice within the project and how it impacts our work
Will the teacher/librarian collaboration part of our project provide evidence of benefits to having two education professionals working together?
Will this in turn support required changes to staffing and support for school libraries nationally?
More survey participants
Communication channels
Tried everything to increase the response rate â Wish we had a bigger sample, particularly of teachers.
Tried to survey principals, but disappointing response.
Bigger sample - drill down further into whether different school types (decile, size, regional/urban, private/public) had different approaches to the library.
If we had comments from principals, then we would be able to examine their attitudes and beliefs, and whether they impact on practice/resourcing.
Many librarians want âwhole of schoolâ approach IL & library seems to be sorely lacking - principals may have shed some light on why this was the case.