1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 1 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Scott Dummer
Development and Operations Hydrologist
Managing a River Forecast Scheme
Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
National Weather Service Pleasant Hill, MO
2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 2 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Provide a good forecast in a timely manner
Keep your model properly balanced in a way
that is representative of the hydro-
meteorological conditions
Keep model modifications representative, yet
understandable for the next forecaster so they
understand what deviations from the model you
made and why
What is the goal of managing a river
forecasting scheme?
3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 3 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Model limited to 6-hr time step and mean areal
values
Use instantaneous and gridded areal data to
Make proper adjustments to model based on
this and other data
Factors to consider when managing a
well balanced well calibrated
forecasting scheme
4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 4 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Need maintain good data as input – i.e.;
Garbage in, Garbage Out
Need to develop and maintain well calibrated
models
Need to have a good forecaster judgement to
modify input & model states as needed to
overcome model limitations and assumptions
so that the model is well balanced
Factors to consider when managing a
well balanced well calibrated
forecasting scheme
5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 5 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Soil moisture needs to reflect the current
conditions.
Limitation is evapotranspiration is calculated
using mean monthly values.
Weather could be warmer, colder, sunnier,
cloudier, windier, less windy, more humid,
less humid than ‘normal’
Factors to consider when managing a
well balanced well calibrated
forecasting scheme
6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 6 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Snow water equivalents and snow cover need
to reflect current conditions
Reservoir outflows, diversions, and return flows
need to represent the current conditions
Observed river flows reflect the current
conditions
Factors to consider when managing a
well balanced well calibrated
forecasting scheme
7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 7 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
To make educated changes to the input or
model states, look at all available data
Not all data is input to the model
Factors to consider when managing a
well balanced well calibrated
forecasting scheme
8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 8 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Precipitation Data
View 24-hr precip or 1-hr PC data and 1-hr to 24-hr radar data in
XNAV
View areal extent and timing of radar precip in relation to basin in
XNAV
View 24-hr and PC data in XDAT
View 24-hr and PC data in XDAT
View 24-hr precip in with View Precip By Magnitude in SLOD Toolbox
View 6-hr MAP and MAPX in CHPS Spatial Data Viewer
View comparisons of PC data to surrounding 24-hr precip with “DCP
Reports by State” in Support Toolbox
View radar composite loops in D2D
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 9 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Stage Data
View all received in XDAT
View selected stations observed and forecast stages in
graphical form in AWIPS Timeseries Plot & CHPS Stage Plots
View 6-hr data in CHPS flow plot and all data in CHPS Stage
Plots
View USGS sites on USGS homepage to compare with stages
we receive
View Bureau of Reclamation sites on Bureau homepage
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
10. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 10 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Snow Data
View observed Snow Fall (SF), Snow Depth (SD) and Snow Water
Equivalent Data in XNAV and CHPS Spatial Data Viewer and Time series
Plot
View Snow Fall (SF), Snow Depth (SD) and Snow Water Equivalent Data in
time series form with XDAT, or with CHPS Plots
View all Snow Depth and Snow Water Equivalent Data by state with
“SnowData” in Support toolbox
View SWE from NOHRSC in text product MSPSWEKRF or for selected
stations in CHPS Snow Plots
View Snowpack sublimation in text product MSPSCVKRF
View snow cover on clear data from Satellite imagery
View snowpack from NRCS and snotel data from Climate Center using
Snowdata link on MBRFC web page
View NOHRSC snow Data on interactive web page
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
11. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 11 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Flow Data
View observed and blended flow in CHPSView reported diversions
and outflows in XDAT, or in CHPS plots
View Bureau of Reclamation diversions and flows on USBR web page
View State of Nebraska diversions and flows on NE DWR web page
View State of Colorado diversions and flows on CO DWR web page
View USGS flows and measurements on USGS web page
View USGS flows plotted in the CHPS flow plot
Review Missouri River flow measurements in NWSChat
mbrfcagencieschat chatroom
View Missouri River measurements on USACE web page
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
12. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 12 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Soil Moisture Data
View SAC-SMA contents or deficits in XNAV, CHPS Spatial
Data Viewer, or for particular locations in the CHPS SACSMA
Plots
Soil Moisture Link on MBRFC web page
High Plains Climate Center’s ET estimates
Palmer Drought Severity Index
Crop Moisture Index
Standardized Precipitation Index
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 13 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
The river forecast model (CHPS) has numerous
limitations
The Forecaster must make modifications (MODS) to
account for those limitations
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
14. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 14 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
River Model Assumptions:
Static and accurate Stage-Discharge Relationships
Rainfall distributed evenly over basin
Rainfall distributed evenly over 6 hour period
Runoff not a function of intensity within the 6 hour period
Snowmelt accurately defined with Snow-17 parameters
Rainfall/runoff accurately defined with SAC-SMA parameter
Static and accurate Unit Hydrographs
Static and accurate routings
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 15 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Modify input based on available data not in the model
QC data that is input to the model and analyze data not
input to model
Modifications to input should be reasonable
Modify model states based on the response of the model to
changes in input
Based on hydrologic philosophy
Modifications to model states should be reasonable
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
16. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 16 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Could be an input data (Meteorological Forcing,
precip/temperature) problem
Could be a model states problem (Soil Moisture)
Could be model parameters not defined correctly
(routing, UH, etc)
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
17. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 17 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Stage Data:
Bad stage value – check all values
Shifted rating not current—check shift log and recent
plotted measurements
Check USGS stages and flows
Check to see if station is rated or has a poor rating
Check to see if station has a looped rating/backwater
affected
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
18. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 18 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Precipitation Data:
Check areal distribution of precipitation—May need to
adjust unit hydrograph or precipitation
Check temporal distribution of precipitation—May want to
shift distribution –May also want to consider MAP (rain
gage only)
Check timing of precipitation in CHPS precip plot– Could
adjust if precipitation occurred near beginning or end of
6-hour period
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 19 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Precipitation Data:
Check precipitation intensity—High intensity may cause
runoff prior to saturation and give reason to increase
runoff
Check whether precipitation is rain or snow
Compare MAPX to MAP. Default (excluding Mountains)
is MAPX, may want to see how MAP performs using a
SWITCHTS Mod in CHPS
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 20 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Flow Data
Check Reservoir Outflows– Call other agency if needed
Check Diversions
Snow Data
Check snow depths, snow water equivalents (SWE) and
areal extent of snow cover
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
21. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 21 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Snow-17 –Adjust to match observed data, or NOHRSC
Estimates if they make sense
Modify Melt Factor or lower Temperatures to delay or
initiate melt if confident in saturation of UZTW
Modify Areal Extent (ASECCHNG) of Snow Cover if
confident in SWE and UZTW data after melt has started.
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
22. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 22 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
SAC-SMA
Check Soil Moisture
Timing of filling of UZTW should coincide with initiation of
runoff
Adjust contents of UZTW accordingly
Compare SAC-SMA states of surrounding basins
Adjustments reasonable based neighbors and recent
precipitation events in the area
IF UZTW saturated and not enough RO, increase
contents of LZTW to reduce percolation demand.
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
23. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 23 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
SAC-SMA (Cont.)
Adjust contents of UZTW accordingly (Cont.)
Is there reason to believe actual ET varied from
computed? (Remember ET calculation is a
climatological normal) —Adjust accordingly
Wetter, colder, cloudier than normal
Hotter, drier, winder than normal
Be aware of basins that include impervious areas
ADIMC (where used) = UZTW + LZTWC
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 24 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Check type of runoff
Adjust states (UZTWC, LZTWC) with reason to make
runoff another type
If total runoff correct but too much interflow– adjust runoff
by placing total for a number of periods of interflow into
the period of rainfall
If too much percolation going to base flow reduce
contents of LZTW if saturated
Modify base flow (LZFP, LZFS)
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
25. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 25 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Unit Hydrograph/Unitgraph—1 inch (unit) runoff per unit time
Check applicability of unitgraph
1st option Modify unitgraph UNITHG to adjust timing of
runoff
2nd option Adjust precip TSCHNG_MAP_MAT, or RRICHNG
to adjust timing of runoff
3rd option Adjust timing of runoff itself using ROCHNG
(bypasses SAC-SMA Model)
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 26 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Backwater Affected Areas
Be aware of locations that are backwater affected.
These are areas that do not have stable stage-discharge
relationship due water backing up to location from to
downstream reservoir, or river
Watch for hydrographs that appear to be cresting then
rise some more.
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
27. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 27 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Communicate with WFO about river, soil and snow
conditions
Keep aware of and Check SAC-SMA states in CHPS
Plots
Monitor recent weather and possible variations to climate
base ET – make adjustments to SAC-SMA parameters
as necessary
Where confident, use model and data to adjust model
locations where there is little confidence or data
Only adjust data and model states to reasonable values
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
28. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 28 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Document reasons to adjust model
Conduct verification analysis on your performance
Wait for upstream groups to be finished before
forecasting downstream group
Make major tributary runs before 8am
Save mainstem run shortly before 8am
Understand the model so that you can note why the
model doesn’t work correctly
Only with your help can we improve the model
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
29. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 29 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
Scarcity of observed precipitation and/or temperature data
Inaccurate WSR-88D precipitation estimates
The duration of precipitation was inconsistent with model
intervals
Non-uniform spatial distribution of precipitation
The snow model performed poorly
The Sacramento Model performed poorly
The unit hydrograph was in error
Deficiencies in the channel routing procedures
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
Top 15 Reasons Why I Blew My Forecast
30. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
National Weather Service 30 Missouri Basin River Forecast Center
Pleasant Hill, MO
The stage-discharge relationship was in error due to such
occurrences as backwater, ice action, log jams, etc
Scarcity of river/reservoir/diversion data
The QPF did not verify
Erroneous precipitation reports were input to the models
Erroneous stage reports were input into the forecast system
The forecast temperatures were in error
Drainages assumed to be “non-contributing” actually
contributed
Managing a well balanced, well calibrated
forecasting scheme
Top 15 Reasons Why I Blew My Forecast