How can school principals and other educational leaders and administrators help their schools implement the Common Core State Standards? In this webinar, Dr. Lisa Leith discusses ways that everyone can be involved to effectively use the Common Core Standards to help increase and track student achievement.
View the full recording of the webinar at http://www.schoolimprovement.com/resources/webinars/leadership-for-the-common-core/
Principal Leadership for the Common Core Webinar Presenation
1. This webinar was held on May 3, 2012.
Watch the recording of this webinar at
http://www.schoolimprovement.com/resources/w
Principal Leadership
ebinars/leadership-for-the-common-core/
for the Common
Core:
Synthesize, Prioritize, M
aximize!
Dr. Lisa Leith
Š2012 School Improvement Network
2. Essential Questions
1. How should principals prioritize the Common Core
work in light of multiple ongoing initiatives?
2. How can principals support Common Core
learning environments where failure is not
predictable along socio-economic or racial
lines?
3. Why does text complexity matter and how can
teachers effectively select appropriate text?
5. What âlook-forsâ or evidences of Common Core
practice could be observed during
walkthroughs?
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
3. Common Core Leadership Strategy
To combine multiple
SYNTHESIZE and separate elements
into a coherent whole
PRIORITIZE To arrange in order of
relative importance
MAXIMIZE To make the most of
and get the highest
value from
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
4. The Mission
TEACHER
COMMON PRACTICE 100%
CORE
STANDARDS STUDENT READY
ENGAGEMENT
ROBUST
LEARNING
ACHIEVEMENT
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
5. The Mission
100%
COMMON READY
CORE
100%
TEACHER PRACTICE
STANDARDS READY
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
ROBUST LEARNING
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
6. Principal Mission
PRINCIPAL TEACHER PRACTICE
LEADERSHIP STUDENT 100%
COMMON CORE
ENGAGEMENT
STANDARDS TEACHER QUALITY READY
ROBUST LEARNING
RTI
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT
LITERACY
PLCâs 100%
ASSESSMENT READY
EQUITY
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
7. Prioritizing the Work
Mental Model for Educational Decision Making
LESS OPPORTUNITY CHOICE MORE OPPORTUNITY
Mica Pollack, PhD
Harvard University
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
10. How can CC support success for all?
STUDENT SUCCESS FACTORS COMMON CORE IMPACT
Focuses conversations
Authentic relationships
Offers clear targets for ALL
Student-centered
Flexible content (CHOICE)
Culturally Responsive
High expectations
High expectations
Rigorous & Engaging
Rigorous & Engaging
21st century learning
Relevant
Collaboration
Collaborative
Learning Progression
Developmentally appropriate
HOT Skills
Future-focused
Emphasis on CC Readiness
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
11. 5 Steps to Common Core SUCCESS
1. Messaging & Awareness
2. Reference the Source
3. Support Learning Progressions
4. Make Explicit Connections
5. Empower Teachers and
Students
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
12. Assemble these tools
A. Copy of ELA & Math Common Core
Standards
Appendices A & B of the ELA
Standards for Mathematical Practice
List of Anchor Standards & CCR Standards
B. Wagnerâs list of 21st Century Skills
C. BLOOMS new taxonomy
D. HOT VERBS List
E. Standards-based lesson plan format
F. Your professional expertise
G. A vision for the success of every child
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
13. FAQuestion
How can I design curriculum
when I donât know what the
new tests will look like?
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
17. New Rules of Engagement
1. The Common Core Standards define a
framework for engagement with the curriculum
that you already teach
2. The VERBS within the Common Core
Standards define Higher Order Thinking skills
students will need to apply as they explore
content in new ways
3. The Common core Standards define College
and Career readiness skills to support student
success across curriculum, content, and
context
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
18. At the Heart of the COMMON COREâŚ
21st Century Skills
1. Critical thinking and problem solving
2. Collaboration and leadership
3. Agility and adaptability
4. Effective oral and written communication
5. Initiative and entrepreneurialism
6. Analyzing and accessing information
7. Curiosity and imagination
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
19. At the heart of the COMMON CORE . . .
Higher Order Thinking
Bloomâs New Taxonomy
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
20. At the heart of the COMMON CORE . . .
Higher Order Thinking
Bloomâs New Taxonomy
ELA CCR.8
DELINEATE AND EVALUATE THE
ARGUMENT AND SPECIFIC
CLAIMS IN A TEXT INCLUDING
THE VALIDITY OF THE
REASONING AS WELL AS THE
RELEVANCE AND SUFFICIENCY
OF THE EVIDENCE.
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
21. Designing Performance Tasks within Blooms Taxonomy
Invent a solution
Consider evidence
Discuss cause & effect
Propose a solution
Explain the reasons
List the types
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
24. ELA Appendix A TEXT COMPLEXITY
Q. Why does text complexity matter?
ACT RESEARCH REPORT 2006
> While college and workplace texts have
become more complex over 50 years, K-12
texts have become less demanding.
> At college level, students are held
accountable for understanding and
synthesizing complex texts independently
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
25. ELA Appendix A TEXT COMPLEXITY
Q2: How do teachers effectively select appropriate
text?
A 3 PART MODEL FOR MEASURING TEXT COMPLEXITY
QUALITATIVE DIMENSIONS
QUANTITATIVE DIMENSIONS
READER & TASK CONSIDERATIONS
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
26. Text Complexity QUALITATIVE DIMENSIONS
⢠Levels of meaning & purpose
⢠Structure
⢠Language
⢠Conventionality & clarity
⢠Knowledge demands
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
27. Text Complexity QUANTITATIVE
DIMENSIONS
⢠Word length
⢠Word frequency
⢠Sentence length
⢠Text cohesion
Typically measured by computer analysis
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
28. Reader & Task Considerations
⢠Studentsâ ability to read complex text does
not always develop in a linear fashion
⢠Standard 10 defines required grade-by-
grade growth in studentsâ ability to read
complex text
⢠Students need opportunities to stretch &
to experience the satisfaction of fluent
reading
⢠Studentsâ motivation, knowledge, and
experiences: Students deeply interested in
a given topic may engage more deeply with
texts on that subject
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
31. Sample Performance Tasks
After listening to L. Frank Baumâs The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, students
describe the characters of Dorothy, Auntie Em, and Uncle Henry, the
setting of Kansas prairie and major events such as the cyclone. RL1.3
Students (with prompting and support from the teacher) when listening
to Laura Ingalls Wilderâs Little House in the Big Woods as questions about
the events that occur (such as the encounter with the bear) and answer
by offering key details drawn from the text. RL1.1
Students identify the points at which different characters are telling the
story in the Finn Family Moomintroll by Tove Jansson RL 1.6
Students identify words and phrases within Molly Bangâs The Paper
Crane that appeal to the senses and suggest the feelings of happiness
experienced by the own of the restaurant
(eg, clapped, played, loved, overjoyed) RL1.4
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
32. Designing Performance Tasks
Recommended Follow-up Activity
⢠LOCATE APPENDIX B in ELA
Standards
http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_B.pdf
⢠1. Explore Stories, Poetry and
Informational Texts
⢠2. Notice grade level groupings
⢠3. Compare Sample Performance Task
to the Standard the task references
⢠4. Choose 1 text sample
⢠5. Create a PERFORMANCE Lesson
Plan using Template
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
35. Standards for Mathematical Practice
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in
solving them
2. Reason abstractly & quantitatively
3. Construct viable arguments and critique the
reasoning of others
4. Model with mathematics
5. Use appropriate tools strategically
6. Attend to precision
7. Look for & make use of structure
8. Look for & express regularity in repeated
reasoning
ASK âWHAT DO MATHEMATICIANS DO?â
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
36. Math Standards Appendix A
âCreate a school-wide community of
support for students
⢠Provide students a âmath supportâ
class during the school day
⢠After-school tutoring
⢠Extended class time (or blocking of
classes) in mathematics
⢠Additional instruction during the
summerâ
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
37. Math Standards Appendix A
âCreate a school-wide community of
support for TEACHERS
⢠Provide teachers a âmath supportâ class
during the school day
⢠After-school tutoring
⢠Additional instruction during the summerâ
RESOURCES
Gates Math Design Collaborative
www.mathreasoninginventory.com
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
38. LEARNING PROGRESSION
A sequenced set of aligned standards
that students master in order to graduate
prepared for life beyond school
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
40. ELA Learning Progression
Reading Standards for Literature K-5
Kindergarten students: Grade 1 students: Grade 2 students:
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. With prompting and 7. Use illustrations and details 7. Use information gained
support, describe the in a story to describe from the illustrations and
relationship between its characters, setting, or words in a print or digital text
illustrations and the story in events to demonstrate
which they appear (e.g., what understanding of its
moment in a story an characters, setting, or plot.
illustration depicts)
9. With prompting and 9. Compare and contrast 9. Compare and contrast
support, compare and the adventures and two or more versions
contrast the adventures and experiences of characters in of the same story (e.g.,
experiences of characters in stories. Cinderella stories) by
familiar stories. different authors or from
different cultures.
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
42. Graphic Map Example
Reading Standards for Informational
Text K-5 Grade 5 Standard 5:
⢠Compare & contrast the overall
structure
(chronology, cause/effect, problem/solu
tion) of events, ideas, concepts or
information in two or more texts.
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
43. Common CoreâŚHow? GRAPHIC MAPS
Reading Standards for
Informational Text K-5 Grade
5 Standard 5:
Compare & contrast the
overall structure
(chronology, cause/effect, pro
blem/solution) of
events, ideas, concepts or
information in two or more
texts.
www.Inspiration.com
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
44. HELPS Successful TeachersâŚ
ďą Take time to know and understand every
studentâs strengths and needs
ďą Communicate the highest expectations for every
student
ďą Set clear goals and targets
ďą Hold students accountable for their behavior and
academic progress
ďą Use clear learning progression to drive RTI
COMMON CORE STANDARDS
100% Ready: College, Career and Beyond
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
45. High Risk to High Achievement
Prognosis:
Academic Success College & Career
Readiness
Socially Responsible
Student ownership
Quality Life
& Engagement
High Expectations
Strong Self-Esteem
Cultural
Proficiency
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
Poor Prognosis:
At Risk
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
46. Empowering Students
To become proactive rather than
reactiveâŚ
â Requires hope AND optimism*
â Requires a sense of empowerment to
influence outcomes*
â Requires clear expectations and goals
â Requires orientation in time
â Requires connection between cause and
effect
*What impact do teacher attitudes, beliefs have on these?
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
47. Encouraging Future Focus
⢠Support and track student progress
⢠Speak specific words of affirmation and
acceptance
⢠Convey high value through
INVESTMENT in their progress
⢠Help students picture a positive future
⢠Help students examine CAUSE AND
EFFECT
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
48. Common Core Leadership Strategy
To combine multiple
SYNTHESIZE and separate elements
into a coherent whole
CC PD PLC RTI AYP LIT EQUITY TQ&E
PRIORITIZE To arrange in order of
relative importance
FOCUS
MAXIMIZE To make the most of
and get the highest
STUDENT SUCCESS value from
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
49. Visit Us Online
Call us: 1-800-572-1153
Visit us on the web: www.schoolimprovement.com
Visit http://www.schoolimprovement.com/pd360-free-pd/webinars/
to see past recordings and register for future webinars.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/SchoolImprovementNet
Blog: http://schoolimprovementnetwork.blogspot.com
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/SchoolImprovementNetwork
Twitter: @sinetpd360
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/school-improvement-
network
Click here to request more information about Common Core
360, or one of our other innovative products.
Š 2011 School Improvement Network
Hinweis der Redaktion
Within every implementation model, there are some key competencies and resources that building leaders will need to gain if they are to successfully lead their school communities into the new age of the Common Core:Â A clear understanding of the rationale behind the decision to adopt the Common Core. Great school leaders care deeply about the educational outcome of every one of their students. Believing there will be life-long benefits for students because they will be better prepared for college and career success will inspire enthusiasm for leading this, sometimes difficult, work. Strategies and resources for developing teacher awareness about and teacher capacity for creating and deploying standards-based lesson plans. Deep understanding of the processes of unwrapping the standards including facilitation of teacher collaboration around curriculum mapping, creating thematic units, constructing pacing guides, aligning lesson plans, and designing formative assessments.Systems for evaluating evidences of effective standards-based education, for incorporating a standards-based lens during classroom walk-throughs, teacher observations, and formal staff evaluations. Â Perhaps most important, yet most straightforward to accomplish: Â Principals need to get to know the standards. A critical principal role in implementing the standards change process is to facilitate powerful conversations regarding what the new standards indicate students should know and be able to do by the time they enter and by the time they leave each grade level. To do this, principals need to become intimately familiar with the organization, scope, depth and purpose of the Common Core standards for both English Language Arts and mathematics.
IN terms of college success, text complexity was at least as important as higher order thinking skills such as inferencing
CONSEQUENCE: TOO MANY STUDENTS READING AT A LOW LEVELâBELOW COLLEGE PROFICIENCY
Creating a school-wide community of support for students; ⢠Providing students a âmath supportâ class during the school day; ⢠After-school tutoring; ⢠Extended class time (or blocking of classes) in mathematics; and ⢠Additional instruction during the summer.Watered-down courses which leave students uninspired to learn, unable to catch up to their peers and unready for success in postsecondary courses or for entry into many skilled professions upon graduation from high school are neither necessary nor desirable. The results of not providing students the necessary supports they need to succeed in high school are well-documented. Too often, after graduation, such students attempt to continue their education at 2- or 4-year postsecondary institutions only to find they must take remedial courses, spending time and money master- ing high school level skills that they should have already acquired. This, in turn, has been documented to indicate a greater chance of these students not meeting their postsecondary goals, whether a certificate program, two- or four- year degree. As a result, in the workplace, many career pathways and advancement may be denied to them. To ensure students graduate fully prepared, those who enter high school underprepared for high school mathematics courses must receive the support they need to get back on course and graduate ready for life after high school.Furthermore, research shows that allowing low-achieving students to take low-level courses is not a recipe for aca- demic success (Kifer, 1993). The research strongly suggests that the goal for districts should not be to stretch the high school mathematics standards over all four years. Rather, the goal should be to provide support so that all students can reach the college and career ready line by the end of the eleventh grade, ending their high school career with one of several high-quality mathematical courses that allows students the opportunity to deepen their understanding of the college- and career-ready standards.With the Common Core State Standards Initiative comes an unprecedented ability for schools, districts, and states to collaborate. While this is certainly the case with respect to assessments and professional development programs, it is also true for strategies to support struggling and accelerated students. The Model Course Pathways in Mathematics are intended to launch the conversation, and give encouragement to all educators to collaborate for the benefit of our statesâ children.
Creating a school-wide community of support for students; ⢠Providing students a âmath supportâ class during the school day; ⢠After-school tutoring; ⢠Extended class time (or blocking of classes) in mathematics; and ⢠Additional instruction during the summer.Watered-down courses which leave students uninspired to learn, unable to catch up to their peers and unready for success in postsecondary courses or for entry into many skilled professions upon graduation from high school are neither necessary nor desirable. The results of not providing students the necessary supports they need to succeed in high school are well-documented. Too often, after graduation, such students attempt to continue their education at 2- or 4-year postsecondary institutions only to find they must take remedial courses, spending time and money master- ing high school level skills that they should have already acquired. This, in turn, has been documented to indicate a greater chance of these students not meeting their postsecondary goals, whether a certificate program, two- or four- year degree. As a result, in the workplace, many career pathways and advancement may be denied to them. To ensure students graduate fully prepared, those who enter high school underprepared for high school mathematics courses must receive the support they need to get back on course and graduate ready for life after high school.Furthermore, research shows that allowing low-achieving students to take low-level courses is not a recipe for aca- demic success (Kifer, 1993). The research strongly suggests that the goal for districts should not be to stretch the high school mathematics standards over all four years. Rather, the goal should be to provide support so that all students can reach the college and career ready line by the end of the eleventh grade, ending their high school career with one of several high-quality mathematical courses that allows students the opportunity to deepen their understanding of the college- and career-ready standards.With the Common Core State Standards Initiative comes an unprecedented ability for schools, districts, and states to collaborate. While this is certainly the case with respect to assessments and professional development programs, it is also true for strategies to support struggling and accelerated students. The Model Course Pathways in Mathematics are intended to launch the conversation, and give encouragement to all educators to collaborate for the benefit of our statesâ children.