Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest<br />Sarah StierchWikipedian In Residence – Archives of Ame...
Notability<br />Subject must receive significant coverage in reliablesources that are independent of the subject, and is p...
No original research<br />We do not accept: facts, allegations, ideas and stories for which no reliable published source e...
Sources<br />Anything that could be challenged must be backed up by a reliable source.<br />A reliable source is published...
What NOT to use<br />What TO use<br /><ul><li>Self published sources
i.e. blogs, patents, newsletters, personal websites, forums & tweets
Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, Myspace
Self-created
 press release
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest: Wikipedia & GLAM

1.372 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest - Wikipedia & GLAMs

Veröffentlicht in: Technologie, Bildung

Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest: Wikipedia & GLAM

  1. 1. Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest<br />Sarah StierchWikipedian In Residence – Archives of American Art, 2011<br />@sarah_stierch<br />stierchs@si.edu<br />
  2. 2. Notability<br />Subject must receive significant coverage in reliablesources that are independent of the subject, and is presumed to meet the criteria for its own stand-alone article or list.<br />
  3. 3. No original research<br />We do not accept: facts, allegations, ideas and stories for which no reliable published source exists.<br />Secret: Oral history that is published online is able to be used, as long as only the facts are delivered.<br />
  4. 4. Sources<br />Anything that could be challenged must be backed up by a reliable source.<br />A reliable source is published is from a trusted new source or publisher.<br />We prefer secondary sources. Primary are okay but should not be the only source used in an article.<br />
  5. 5. What NOT to use<br />What TO use<br /><ul><li>Self published sources
  6. 6. i.e. blogs, patents, newsletters, personal websites, forums & tweets
  7. 7. Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, Myspace
  8. 8. Self-created
  9. 9. press release
  10. 10. Legit news sources
  11. 11. NYT, Post, non-bias
  12. 12. Academy, peer-reviewed, scholarly = preferred
  13. 13. Can use BLOG from reliable trustworthy sources like SI, NYT</li></li></ul><li>Conflict of Interest<br />Where advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest.<br />Example: Writing or editing your own institutions Wikipedia page without secondary sources and with peacock words<br />Example: Adding external links to your general website on Wikipedia pages. <br />Example: Creating an account called “ArchivesAmerArt” to serve as an institutional group account for edits. <br />
  14. 14.
  15. 15. Conflict of Interest<br />DO create a user account for yourself<br />DO create a userpage that describes your position, institution and area of expertise<br />DO edit as yourself, NOT as your institution<br />DO improve articles and content related your passion & interests, you know the right sources & tools to improve Wikipedia!<br />
  16. 16. Sourcing, original research, notability & conflict of interest<br />Sarah StierchWikipedian In Residence – Archives of American Art, 2011<br />@sarah_stierch<br />stierchs@si.edu<br />

×