Engaging Eid Ul Fitr Presentation for Kindergartners.pptx
D3 Overcoming Provincialism
1. Overcoming Provincialism
Howard Stein Hudson
Keri Pyke, P.E., PTOE | Principal of Planning and Public Involvement
Kristina Johnson | Manager of Transportation Planning
Fitzgerald and Halliday
Susan VanBenschoten, P.E. | President and CEO
Mary Miltimore | Senior Community Planner and Designer
The Cecil Group
Emily Keys Innes, LEED AP ND | Urban Planner
Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Governments
L. Jean Davies, AICP | Principal Planner and Program Manager
HOW TO PLAN REGIONALLY WITHOUT SACRIFICING LOCAL IDENTY
2. Session Format and Agenda
Introductions
• Session purpose
• Overview of project case studies
Interactive charrette
• Planning scenario
• Report back
Our solutions: Back to the case studies
• Stoughton Town Square
• Boston Post Road: Connecticut shoreline
Discussion and additional ideas
11. Stoughton Downtown Redevelopment Plan
Client is the Stoughton
Redevelopment Authority
Purpose is to enable the
SRA to undertake actions
that will create incentives
for the private market
to invest in Downtown
Stoughton
Implementation step from
the recently completed
Stoughton Master Plan
12. Stoughton Downtown: Current Conditions
Major Crossroads:
Routes 27, 138, and 139
Possible expansion of
South Coast Rail: link Boston
to New Bedford and Fall River
Large portion of land in
downtown devoted to
commuter parking
Current configuration
of roads, rail, and parking
makes larger-scale new
development difficult
20. Stoughton Square Traffic Improvements
Develop short-term, mid-,
and long-term alternatives
Multimodal accommodation
Integration with future
South Coast Rail Expansion
Using transportation design
process as placemaking
21. Minimize congestion
and maximize safety
Improve pedestrian
and cyclist access to
activity centers
Enhance streetscape
and parking
Local capacity to address
transportation and
circulation needs
Stoughton Square Traffic Improvements
Connecting Transportation and Land Use Planning…
Stoughton Comprehensive Plan:
Transportation Recommendations
22. Regional needs can have
an unexpected effect on
local development patterns
Density required for a
walkable downtown may
be difficult to achieve on
smaller, irregular parcels
Key Lessons
23. Municipalities should work
with property
owners/developers
Create incentives for parcel
assembly while respecting
the existing development
pattern and physical context
One Option:
Density bonuses/design
guidelines
Key Lessons
24. Use the transportation
design process for local plan
implementation
Partner with regional entities
early and often
Show economic value of
multimodal transportation
Develop an alternative that
be “tested out”
Key Lessons
26. Regional Transportation Context & Development Patterns
CLINTON
WESTBROOK
OLD
SAYBROOK
Clinton
Harbor
High Density Beach
Communities
High Density
Beach
Communities
Marina
District
Beach Communities
Water’s
Edge
Resort
27. Boston Post Road: A Few Facts
12 miles through 3 towns
12,000 to 17,000 ADT midday
Saturday peak
ADT increases about 20% on
summer weekends
Coastal summer tourist
destination
Retail corridor with adjacent
neighborhoods
Mix of national and
independent retailers
28. Boston Post Road: Planning Challenge
How do we support local economic
development, sustainability, and
quality of life in shoreline tourist communities
with high seasonal fluctuation and climate change
threats?
Local & Regional Transportation Strategies
Local & Regional Land Use strategies
29. Boston Post Road: Key Considerations
Seasonal fluctuations in:
• Population
• Traffic
• Demand for services: Retail,
Commercial, and Tourism
Coastal communities
increasingly deal with:
• Storm threats and impacts
• Insurance and funding
burdens
• Development restrictions
30. Boston Post Road: Our Solutions
Route 1 will be known regionally as a southern New England
coastal recreation and retail destination with small-scale and
larger national retail shopping and dining opportunities
combined with cohesive Town Centers that reflect a sense of
vibrancy and a strong year-round community.
31. 1. Local Roadway Design
2. Regional Incident Management
3. Pedestrian Improvements & Wayfinding Plan
4. Bicyclist Improvements & Bike Education Program
5. Coastal Bus Service & Transit Improvements
6. Key Intersection Modifications
7. Access Management Plan & Curb Cut Modifications
8. Connectivity/ Network Enhancements
01 TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES
32. Ideal cross section:
Multimodal
Safety first
Customizable
1.1 Local Solution Guiding Principle
39. Increases efficiency
by rebalancing
traffic load
Enhances access to
businesses
Reduces vehicular
lanes and ped
crossing distance
Calms traffic and
accommodates all
modes safely
1.1 Local Solution: Old Saybrook Gateway
42. 1.2 Regional Solution: Incident Mgmt. Plan
Design for Desired Function
Route 1’s highest priorities: safety, placemaking, & livability
vs
43. It’s a policy decision!
What’s the purpose of
each facility?
Regional incident
management can:
• Manage routes
• Minimize diversions
• Better define role of
local authorities
1.2 Regional Solution: Incident Mgmt. Plan
44. 02 LAND USE STRATEGIES
1. Support Local Development in Dynamic Environments
2. Develop Regional Economic Development Strategy
3. Resiliency Enhancements
4. Enhance Town Centers & Discourage Sprawl
5. Encourage Transit-Friendly Development
6. Village Parking Enhancements
7. Regulatory and Zoning Modifications
8. Town Center Marketing Campaign
9. Design Guidelines & Façade Improvement Program
10.Support Active & Healthy Design Initiatives
48. Economic
benefits:
More options = More
customers
Increase peak season
sales = stay in
business year round
Lease & permit fees =
$ for towns &property
owners
2.1 Local Solution: Pop-Up Retail Permitting
49. 2.2 Regional Solution: Economic Growth
Regional Economic Development Plan for
the Lower Connecticut River Valley Region
Ongoing (June– December 2015)
Purpose: Capitalize on existing distinctive
assets and develop a regional vision for
future growth
50. 2.2 Regional Solution: Economic Growth
Regional Economic Development Plan
• Engaging the Community
• Thinking about the hard questions…and then figuring
out what to do about them!
51. • Regional branding and identity
• Collaboration between towns
2.2 Regional Solution: Economic Growth
“There should be an emphasis on
the marriage of nature and culture,
and a strategy to produce more of
these assets moving forward”
52. Lessons Learned
Different economic visions
Similar transportation priorities
Local economies are connected regionally
• Mutually supportive land uses can compliment local vision
• Small improvements in one place can be felt elsewhere
Regional collaboration helps address local problems
53. Overcoming Provincialism
Howard Stein Hudson
Keri Pyke, P.E., PTOE | Principal of Planning and Public Involvement
Kristina Johnson | Manager of Transportation Planning
Fitzgerald and Halliday
Susan VanBenschoten, P.E. | President and CEO
Mary Miltimore | Senior Community Planner and Designer
The Cecil Group
Emily Keys Innes, LEEDGreen Associate | Urban Planner
Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Governments
L. Jean Davies, AICP | Principal Planner and Program Manager
HOW TO PLAN REGIONALLY WITHOUT SACRIFICING LOCAL IDENTITY
Hinweis der Redaktion
Balance needs of all sers
About 4-5 incidents per week
Diversions to Route 1 are routine
Biggest issue on summer weekends
Non-recurrent congestion is becoming a ‘normal’ event
About 4-5 incidents per week
Diversions to Route 1 are routine
Biggest issue on summer weekends
Non-recurrent congestion is becoming a ‘normal’ event
Simon’s Marketplace – Deep River Landing
Liv’s Oyster Bar – Saybrook Point
http://pavementtoparks.sfplanning.org/docs/Citywide_Assessment_Report_Panganiban_Abad_2014.09.pdf
Reasons for Visit and Spending
Respondents of intercept surveys acknowledged a diverse
range of reasons for visiting the parklet, with a majority of respondents
stating “dining, “meeting friends” and “entertainment” as their
primary reason for their visit. Generally, parklets were frequented
for more recreational purposes, as opposed to serving local uses like
living/working nearby, running errands, or simply passing through
the area.
Many of the activities that attract people to parklets also
involve spending. 90% of respondents spent money while using the
parklet, and about half of respondents stated that they spent $10 or
less when they visited, with a majority of them citing dining as their
primary reason for visiting the neighborhood. Although parklets are
publicly accessible and do not require patronage of the sponsoring
entity in order to use the parklet, 11% of respondents spent no money
in the neighborhood or at the sponsoring entity while visiting the
parklet. People who spent little to no money ($0-$10) while visiting
the parklet still acknowledged a variety of commercial and non-
commercial reasons; most notably, 29% of them citied proximity from
home/work while another 17% cited meeting with friends as prima
Mutually supportive land uses can compliment local vision
Small improvements in one location often results in connected growth in adjacent communities