3. Outline
๏ฑIntroduction
๏ฑThe Journey
๏ฑExperiences and Achievements
๏ฑFindings from Second Approach
โข The origin โ SIANI Kenya Chapter (SKCEG)
โข Objectives of expert group
โข First Approach
โข Second Approach
๏ฑConclusion and Way Forward
๏ฑ Why Giant
4. WHY GIANT ?
๏ฑDriver for economic growth and
transformationโฆhigh economic growth
directly linked to increased agricโ production
๏ฑPercentage of population involved/affected by
agriculture
๏ฑKenya agro-ecological zone diversity
๏ฑDemographic Characteristics - Youth
5. Introduction
๏ฑ A brainstorming on findings led to the establishment
of a multidisciplinary group of experts.
๏ฑASDSP a joint programme by GOS and GOK (3)
baseline survey tell on Commercialization;-
Productivity, Income and Food Security
๏ฑA worrying trend on 1) Household food security, 2)
Food productivity and incomes 3)
Un(under)employment 4) Youth and Women in
agriculture 5) Land degradation and 6) little/No
commercialization
6. Introduction cont.
Objectives of SIANI Kenya Chapter
๏ฑWhat is the current status of the agricultural
sector in Kenya?
๏ฑWhy is the sector the way it is?
๏ฑHow can stakeholders harness the sectorโs
potential and remove obstacles to
commercialization?
7. The Journey
Expert Group approach โ launched
successfully with a lot of enthusiasm but did
not work. Abandoned after three months
Two approaches were used to accomplish the strategy
Junior expert mentoring approach -
successful and provided information partially
answering what? and why ?questions
8. ๏ฑMechanization (Cassava) โ Country yield of Cassava is
15% of potential. Issues for mechanization; farm size,
access to credit/machine suppliers, information on
technologies along value chain
Findings from Second Approach
๏ฑFarmer organization (dairy) โ Only 55% of small-scale
farmers sell produce vs 85% needed to be
commercialized. Collective action from production to
marketing can improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Issues; human and institutional capacities
๏ฑProfitability (maize) โ Maize cannot be profitable at
subsistence level. OPVs at subsistence higher gross
margins than hybrid. At present yield level, per capita
income of 5 cents/day/ha
9. ๏ฑAgricultural data โ Limited emphasis and low
prioritization in use of data have led to little/no
use in decision and policy making. All the
agricultural indicators have been produced
through estimation arising from sample
surveys.
๏ฑ Because of limited/unreliable data not
evidence based policy making
Findings from Second Approach
10. Experiences and Achievements
๏ฑSE Approach did not work- WHY?- Competing
need, time, monetary compensation, gasp of
concept- ( may work in next phase)
๏ฑProcess rigorous, some JE dropped off โ need
for qualitative selection of JE
๏ฑTechnical capacities of fresh graduates in critical
analysis and communication of scientific issues
wanting
๏ฑRequire commitment from both mentees (JE) and
mentors (SE)
๏ฑOn objectives ? What โ some, Why- some,
How- next SIANI phase
11. ๏ฑMany stakeholders in the agricultural sector all
trying to commercialize agriculture
Conclusions and Way forward
๏ฑOutput papers give evidence that
commercialization is superficially being
addressed
๏ฑNeed for deeper understanding of
commercialization and sharing of this to
stakeholders
๏ฑNeed to develop adequate policies to make
agriculture a driver of rural transformation
Origin; An multidisciplinary group of experts who would consolidate knowledge and focus their interactive capacities to address the challenges that hinder commercialization of Kenyaโs agriculture
How would the expert group answer these questions regarding commercialization in Kenya?
Policy Briefs
Situational analysis papers
Report on what, why and how
Senior experts โ 1st
Experts drawn fromโฆ.are to be assigned to each of the categories into a โnodeโ according to their area of expertise. For example, there would be one node of productivity experts, and a node of environment experts, infrastructure experts etc who will work on developing these respective sections of the report and analysis of data sets.
There are areas of overlap for many of the categories. For example environmental conditions impacts productivity. In such cases of overlap, the "environment expert node" should review and comment/provide input to the work and drafts made by the "productivity expert node", and so on. The idea is that one node holds the overall workload and responsibility for โtheirโ parameter/field of expertise, while receiving inputs and perspectives from experts with knowledge of areas that overlap.
Each of the parameters/nodes must cover the following over-arching issues: policy (regulations/laws) and gender, in order to avoid these two important issues to stand alone
Analysis VC based
Well on the way to commercialization; dairy, fish, poultry, maize and banana.
Big potential for commercialization; cassava, meat, honey, mango, Irish potatoes.
Outliers can be considered for commercialization; local vegetables, agroforestry, soya bean, sorghum, pasture.
Second- je/ guiding se
Junior experts identified
Problem Trees / Cause-Effect methodology used to investigate issues assigned with regard to commercialization.
Engage in WRITESHOPS entailing extensive literature review, data collection and analysis on key issues.
Periodic presentations of Papers to SEs by JEs for review & guidance.
Low level or subsistence- very low level of productivity and production often at a loss, to a large degree for subsistence. This is the majority of the farmers.
Intermediate level- intermediate level of productivity and emerging entrepreneurship skills, greater degree of marketing of produce
High level- fully commercial producer, producing for the market.