Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Ballingham_Levine_FinalProject

96 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Ballingham_Levine_FinalProject

  1. 1. Abstract— In this lab, students were tasked with calculating the Furuta pendulum system gain values using the LQR method for the pendulum up position. The LQR (linear-quadratic regulator) method is a way to calculate system gains that allows for optimal control of a dynamic system at a minimum or optimal cost. This is done by using the system inputs (A and B matrices), system outputs (C and D matrices) and weightings for cost and control. Using these values along with Matlab, the system gains can be calculated. Index Terms—Furuta pendulum, LQR method, optimization, pendulum up I. INTRODUCTION his lab tasked students to calculate the Furuta pendulum system gain values using the LQR method for the pendulum up position. This was done by using the LQR method. The LQR method is frequently used to optimize control systems in real-world applications where the amount (or weighting) of control effort must be weighed against the cost of the controller. This is done typically because the amount of control effort is directly proportional to the cost of implementing the controller. This is due to the fact that increasing control effort typically requires more feedback sensors and programming which all contribute to a higher overall cost of implementing the controller. The goal of this lab is for students to find a good balance with regards to cost and control effort while still balancing the pendulum in an upward position. II. PROCEDURE A. System hardware setup This lab has the same setup that has been used in both lab 3 and lab 4. The Furuta pendulum consists of a swing-arm and a pendulum arm that are controlled using full-state feedback. Each arm has its own encoder and motor that allows for students to control the system using the DAQ and LabView. B. Implementation of LQR method The LQR method is performed by first obtaining the input matrices A and B described by the following equations: 𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥 + 𝐵𝑢̇ (1) The A and B matrices are obtained from the parameterized system values/state-space system representation found in labs 3 & 4. The quadratic cost function that is used in the LQR method is found using the following equation: 𝐽 = 𝑥 𝑇(𝑡1)𝐹(𝑡1)𝑥(𝑡1) + ∫ (𝑥 𝑇 𝑄𝑥 + 𝑢 𝑇 𝑅𝑢)𝑑𝑡 𝑡1 𝑡0 (2) Where R is the matrix which sets the cost/weightings of the control and Q is the matrix that sets the cost/weightings of the errors in the states. The input vector u is the full-state feedback law: 𝑢 = −𝐾𝑥 (3) And where the vector of gains, K, are found using the following formula: 𝐾 = 𝑅−1 (𝐵 𝑇 𝑃(𝑡)) (4) Where B is one of the input matrices and P is found by solving the continuous time Riccati differential equation. [1] The system gains using the LQR method were found using Matlab. In the Matlab code, the user is required to input the input (A and B) and output (C and D) matrices found using the parameterized system values found in lab 3 and the targeted pole locations found in lab 4 using the pole placement subVI in LabView. These matrices represent the input/output dynamics of the system in a state-space fashion and are necessary for implementing the LQR method Matlab code. In addition, the user must input the R vector which sets the cost/weightings of the control and the Q matrix sets the cost/weightings of the errors in the states. Figure 1 shows the Matlab code that was used to find the system gain values using the LQR method. Final Project: Calculating Furuta Pendulum System Gains Using LQR Method Ballingham, Ryland & Levine, Tevan Section 7042 12/7/16 T
  2. 2. <Section####_Lab#> Double Click to Edit 2 2 Fig.1. Matlab code used to implement LQR method The code outputs four vectors of gain values. Using the lab 4 LabView VI, these gains are then tested on the actual system. Table 1 in the results section shows the gain values that were obtained using this code. The R matrix was found through a lot of trial and error experimenting with a range of different R values on the physical Furuta pendulum system. The Q matrix was determined based on trying to get gain values similar to the gains found by using pole-placement in LabView. [1] C. Quantifying System Performance System performance is quantified using the root mean square formula to solve for errors. RMS error is shown below: 𝑥 𝑟𝑚𝑠 = √ 1 𝑛 (𝑥1 2 + 𝑥2 2 + ⋯ + 𝑥 𝑛 2) (5) RMS error was calculated for 𝜃1 and 𝜃2, where 𝜃1 represents the swing arm and 𝜃2 represents the pendulum arm. III. RESULTS TABLE I GAIN/STATE VARIABLES Gain Gain Classification State Variable State Variable Measurement 𝒌 𝟏 Proportional 𝜃1 Swing arm position 𝒌 𝟐 Proportional 𝜃2 Pendulum arm position 𝒌 𝟑 Derivative 𝜃̇3 Swing arm angular velocity 𝒌 𝟒 Derivative 𝜃4 ̇ Pendulum arm angular velocity 𝒌 𝟓 Proportional 𝑖 Motor current TABLE II SYSTEM WEIGHTINGS AND GAIN VALUES R value Q value 𝒌 𝟏 𝒌 𝟐 𝒌 𝟑 𝒌 𝟒 𝒌 𝟓 1 40 -0.2635 1.3008 -0.1614 0.1966 0.0006 5 40 -0.1179 0.8997 -0.0913 0.1369 0.0005 7.5 40 -0.0962 0.8348 -0.0802 0.1271 0.0005 10 40 -0.0833 0.7948 -0.0734 0.1210 0.0005 Fig.2. Plot of swing arm position/vertical pendulum position and desired swing arm position vs. time for R=1. Fig.3. Plot of swing arm position/vertical pendulum position and desired swing arm position vs. time for R=5.
  3. 3. <Section####_Lab#> Double Click to Edit 3 3 Fig.4. Plot of swing arm position/vertical pendulum position and desired swing arm position vs. time for R=7.5. Fig.5. Plot of swing arm position/vertical pendulum position and desired swing arm position vs. time for R=7.5. TABLE III RMS ERROR R Value Q Value RMS Error 𝜽 𝟏 RMS Error 𝜽 𝟐 1 40 0.343 0.101 5 40 0.710 0.119 7.5 40 0.328 0.074 10 40 0.544 0.125 IV. DISCUSSION The purpose of the Final Project assignment was to build on the full-state feedback controllers designed to control the Furuta Pendulum system. Students are asked to find the balance between cost effectiveness and control effort. This is done by utilizing the LQR method. The matlab code was implemented to find desired gain vectors based on the state- space model that was found using LabView in previous labs. Once the gains values were established, they were tested on the physical Furuta Pendulum setup in lab. Using the rms method, errors were calculated for both 𝜃1 and 𝜃2, where 𝜃1 corresponds to the swing arm and 𝜃2 corresponds to the pendulum arm. Referencing Table II, it can be seen that an R value of 7.5 yielded better results than any other R value. At an R value of 7.5, RMS error of both 𝜃1 and 𝜃2 was the smallest. Using an R value of 1 yielded the next best results as RMS errors for both theta’s were the next smallest. From the data taken, it is clear that there is not a clear correlation in terms of R value selection and lower RMS errors. Instead, certain values of R yield more desired results than others, in no order. Given more time to experiment with different R values and the Furuta Penduum setup, RMS error could potentially be reduced even further. Using R values that were too large, greater than ten, the system was not able to command pendulum motion efficiently. Large R values caused the system to become unstable, yielding results that were undesirable. For all gains used, the system yielded reasonably stable results. REFERENCES [1] S. Banks, “EML 4314C Fall 2016 Lecture Notes”

×