Let's REFORM English SPELLING in 2013!

2. Any reform in spelling should take place over a
long time to prevent confusion. It should also be
completely coherent, and the invention of new
letters should be avoided. A convenient way of
revision would involve altering or deleting one
letter, or associated group of letters, per year, to
give people time to absorb the change.

3. For example, in Year 1 that extremely useless
letter ‘c’ would be dropped to be replased by either
‘k’ or ‘s’, and likewise ‘x’ would no longer form part
of the alphabet. The only remaining kase in which
‘c’ would be kept will be the ‘ch’ formation, which
will be dealt with later.

4. Year 2 might well reform ‘w’ spelling so that
‘which’ and ‘one’ would take the same konsonant,
while Year 3 might well abolish ‘y’ replasing it with
‘i’, and Iear 4 might fiks the ‘g’ - ‘j’ anomali wonce
and for all.

5. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue
iear bai iear, with Iear 5 doing awai with useless
double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so
modifaiing vowlz and the remaining voist and
unvoist konsonants.

6. Bi ier 15 or so, it wud fainali be possible tu meik
ius of the redandant letez ‘c’, ‘y’, and ‘x’ - bai
now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould
doderes - tu replais ‘ch’, ‘sh’ and ‘th’ rispektivli.

7. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers of orxogrefikl
riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius
xrewawt xe ‘Ingliy-spiking werld. Haweve, sins
xe Wely, ex Airy, and ex Skates, not to
Manyana nous hue live nor ova a lain between
ex Seven and Ex Way, due not spike Ingle, ex
wd he to he a spelling suited Tu er on lengwij.
Xei kud, haweve, orlweiz lern Ingliy az a
sekond lengwij at skuul!

8. @writeabilityjrd