The document discusses change and innovation in eGovernment. It identifies seven classic barriers to change: leadership, money, fragmentation, coordination, organization, trust, and design. It argues that eGovernment initiatives should think like startups, simplify processes and focus on key goals, and test and adapt solutions. Effective eGovernment also requires promotion, transparency, use of APIs and standards, political will, partnerships, cooperation, mobile access, and good user interface design.
11. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam,
eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam
voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione
voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit,
sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
âąâŻ Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam
âąâŻ Nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse
âąâŻ Quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti
quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia
deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam
libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere
possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis
aut rerum necessitatibus. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id
quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est. Whatâs your pitch? Omnis dolor repellendus.
Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates repudiandae
sint et molestiae non recusandae. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus
maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
1.⯠Saepe eveniet ut et voluptates repudiandae sint et molestiae non recusandae. Itaque earum rerum hic.
2.⯠Tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus
asperiores repellat. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque
3.⯠Laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt
explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni
dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet,
consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam
14. âŻ
VIENNA, 13.05.2015 ROMAN ABASHIN | WU WIEN 2015 14
Promotion
Transparency
SOA/APIs
Political will
Partnership
Cooperation
Mobile
UI/UX
15. How eGov should work
VIENNA, 13.05.2015 ROMAN ABASHIN | WU WIEN 2015 15
16. Key take-aways for effective eGov
1.⯠Think like a startup
2.⯠Simplify and focus
3.⯠Test and adapt
4.⯠Bonus tip: Externalize projects
VIENNA, 13.05.2015 ROMAN ABASHIN | WU WIEN 2015 16
18. References I/II
âŻBrons, M.; Burkert, C.; Viola, G. (2006): SOA in der Ăffentlichen Verwaltung. Paradigmenwechsel oder Episode?
News article. In: eGovernment Computing, 09.12.2006.
âŻCenter for Digital Government (2008): ENGAGE. Creating e-Government that Supports Commerce, Collaboration,
Community and Commonwealth. Dec 2007, Folsom, CA, USA.
âŻEnyon, R.; Margetts, H. (2007): Organisational Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to eGovernment. Journal article. In:
European Journal of ePractice. No 1., Nov 2007.
âŻKarlstetter, E.; Viola, G. (2008): Software-EinfĂŒhrung. Nicht ohne Change Management. News article. In: eGovernment
Computing, 16.01.2008.
âŻKaryotakis, K. M.; Moustakis, V. (2014): Total quality management and change management in public organizations.
Conference paper. Sinteza 2014.
âŻNograsek, J. (2011): Change Management as a Critical Success Factor in e-Government Implementation. Journal article.
In: Business systems research. Vol 2, No 2, Oct 2011, pp. 1- 56.
âŻReichstĂ€dter, P. (2014): Best practices in Ăsterreich. Strategie, Umsetzung, Erfahrungen, ToDos. Presentation.
Netzdialog 2014.
VIENNA, 13.05.2015 ROMAN ABASHIN | WU WIEN 2015 18
19. References II/II
âŻReichstĂ€dter, P. (N.A.): Innovative Models in eGovernance. Good Practice Digital Austria. Presentation.
âŻSchĂ€fer, F. (2010): Kommunales Change Management. Strategien fĂŒr Reformen im Ăffentlichen Dienst. Book chapter.
Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-26.
âŻSchridde, H. (2010): Change Management. Book chapter. In: Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform. Blanke B, Nullmeier F,
Reichard C, Wewer G (Eds); VS Verlag fĂŒr Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 279-291.
âŻThe Potsdam Institute for eGovernment (2014): Aktuelle AusprĂ€gung sowie Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der E-
Government-Aus- und Fortbildung von Fach- und FĂŒhrungskrĂ€ften der Verwaltung. White paper. Ed.: IfG.CC â The Institute
for eGovernment, 20.06.2014.
âŻThom, N.; Ritz, A. (2008): Arten des Wandels. Book chapter. In: Public Management. Innovative Konzepte zur FĂŒhrung
im öffentlichen Sektor. Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 51-115.
âŻUndheim, T. A. (2008): Best practices in eGovernment: - on a knife-edge between success and failure. Journal article. In:
European Journal of ePractice. No 2., Feb 2008.
âŻUNPAN (2014): E-Government Survey 2014. E-Government for the future we want. UNPAN, New York.
VIENNA, 13.05.2015 ROMAN ABASHIN | WU WIEN 2015 19
Gelesen: Papers, PrĂ€sentationen, Buchkapitel zu PubMan, CM,âŠ.
Wo soll ich den Fokus setzen?
Not -> Tugend
Was kann ich liefern? Was wÀre interessant?
Unternehmerisches Denken
Wasserfallmodell
â Â Leadership failures resulting in slow and patchy progress to eGovernment.
â Â Financial inhibitors limiting the flow of investment to eGovernment innovation.
â Â Digital divides and choices, where inequalities lead to differences in motivations and competences that constrain and fragment eGovernment take-up and fail to address particular user needs.
â Â Poor coordination across jurisdictional, administrative and geographic boundaries that holds back eGovernment networking benefits.
â Â Workplace and organisational inflexibility impairing adaptability to new networked forms of information sharing and service provision.
â Â Lack of trust heightening fears about inadequate security and privacy safeguards in electronic networks.
â Â Poor technical design leading to incompatibilities between information and communications technology (ICT) systems or difficult-to-use eGovernment services.
Meine Ansicht
Was heiĂt das?Einzelbenefits und use cases
ï Was heiĂt das?
Um das zu verdeutlichen
Viel Text in Verodrnungen, Juristen
â> was ist Kernnutzen?
Einstein
Zu viel zu frĂŒh, Rad neu, ganze Welt
Promotion: Time, Money, Process, Login, Banklogin â Benefit, flexibel, ohne Transaktionskosten
Transparency: Technik, Data ownership,
Infrastructure: decentralized, API, Data exchange, open
Politcal will: Leaders, open to citizens and companies, long term Strategy, focus on benefit
Private partnership: Business model vs Costs & flexibility (eKool = 70%)
Mobile: not only PC, but tablets, smartphones etc (-> keycards)
Cooperation: International â> lower costs
UI/UX: CLEAR additional benefit, nicht nur Transfer, sondern VerkĂŒrzung, Weniger Kosten + Zeit = Argument