Anzeige
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Anzeige
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Anzeige
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Anzeige
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Anzeige
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Resourcd File
Anzeige
Resourcd File
Nächste SlideShare
Week 5 Bandura Describe and EvaluateWeek 5 Bandura Describe and Evaluate
Wird geladen in ... 3
1 von 25
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Anzeige

Resourcd File

  1. Year 11 November Mock – Revision Pack Key terms, studies and theories What do we need to learn? • Always use your topic checklists to make sure you can define the key terms in each. How can we learn them? • Flash cards • Get others to test you (can use your flash cards!) • Mind maps • Create a crossword • Make a song/rhyme • Any other method you like? How can we make sure we remember them? We must use semantic processing. This means we need to consider the meaning of what we’re trying to learn. For example, if we wanted to learn the following phrase: “Obedience means following orders from someone we perceive to be in authority” We could list come examples of people who we perceive to be in authority e.g. parent/teacher/police officer/lawyer etc. and imagine the orders that they may give us e.g. sit quietly/tidy your room/follow me to the police car etc. Or We could put it into a picture, e.g. Why should we bother? • Unfortunately, information can’t just fall into our heads (although it would be great if it could!). We don’t have long until the final GCSE examinations, and they unlock the door to your future, whatever you would like that to be. We have to disclose our GCSE results when applying for any job, so it is 100% worth trying to do as well as we possibly can.
  2. A bit of motivation….
  3. Let’s get started! Sex and Gender Chromosomes Hormone Males Females XX XY Testosterone Oestrogen How does the psychodynamic theory explain gender development? – Fill the gaps (p.122-124) The psychodynamic theory was developed by F…………….. . He believed that many of our thoughts are u…………………………………. , which means that we’re not aware of them. Freud believed that development happens in ………… stages. Important changes occur during each stage. The third stage is considered very important in terms of g…………………. development. This stage is called the p……………….. stage and it occurs between the ages of ………… and …………. . Freud believes that, during this stage, the child unconsciously sexually d…………………. the parent of the o…………………... sex and is jealous of the parent of the s……………….. sex. In order to deal with these feelings, the child begins to like the same-sex parent, which is known as i……………………………….. . Freud believed this process was different in b…………. and g…………… Sex identity is: Gender identity is:
  4. Boys: The o…………………………… complex occurs. This is when boys are u………………………………… attracted to their m………………… and jealous of their f………………….. (the boy wants to take his place!). He becomes a………………………. that his father will find out about his feelings and want to c………………………. him (uh oh!), so in order to resolve this problem, he gives up on the feelings for his mother and i……………………………. with his father. He begins to behave like his father and adopts a m…………………………………. gender role. He has now resolved the Oedipus complex! Girls: During the p…………………….. stage, girls are unconsciously a………………………… to their f…………………. and jealous of their m…………………… . The girl is anxious that her mother will find out but, unlike boys, the girl already believes she has been c……………………………., so she’s not as fearful. She is still torn between the feelings she has for her father and the fear of losing her mother’s love. This is the E………………………. complex. To resolve this, she i……………………….. with her mother and behaves in a similar way to her. What if a child is raised in a lone-parent household? Freud says the Oedipus/Electra complex is never resolved! So a boy raised without a father will not be masculine and would become a homosexual. Key study alert! Little Hans Aim: To investigate Little Hans’s phobia This was a case study (an in-depth study of one person/small group) Method: Freud analysed information about Little Hans that was provided by his father. • At what age did Little Hans develop his phobia of horses? • What type of horses was he particularly frightened of? • What did he think might happen to him or the horse? Results:
  5. • What did Freud claim Hans was experiencing? • How did Hans’s fear of horses relate to the Oedipus complex? Conclusion: This supports Freud’s ideas of the Oedipus complex. Evaluation of Freud’s case study with Little Hans Strengths Weaknesses What is good about case studies? What is bad about case studies? What is wrong with Freud analysing Hans’s unconscious? You might think “all of this is a bit bonkers!!” and you wouldn’t be the only one! Create a mind map of issues with the psychodynamic theory of gender development. One has been done for you…..
  6. Because Freud’s ideas are all about the unconscious, we can’t really test them! The social learning theory of gender development Gender is learnt from watching and imitating the behaviour of others. An adult/another child acts as a role model and provides an example for the child to follow. List 3 characteristics of role models (p.126) • • • There are 3 key processes involved in social learning. Match up the processes to their key terms, then draw a picture to represent each process. Modelling Vicarious reinforcement Imitation Copying the behaviour of a model. Learning from the models being either punished or rewarded. A role model provides an example of behaviour for the child.
  7. Applying your knowledge….. Lucy was watching her mum bake a birthday cake for her best friend Sandra. When the Sandra came to the house to see Lucy’s mum, she was overwhelmed! She gave Lucy’s mum a huge hug and thanked her for being so thoughtful. She also praised her mum for making such a delicious cake. The following week, it was Lucy’s friend’s birthday and Lucy asked whether she would be allowed to make her a cake. Using social learning theory, explain Lucy’s behaviour. Use the terms modelling, imitation and vicarious reinforcement in your answer. (3 marks) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… The media – what part does it play in gender development? Children often want to i.................................. characters on television because they are more physically a........................................ . Male and female characters are often shown in stereotyped ways. The media therefore provides m…………….. for gender behaviour. List 2 stereotypical roles for males and 2 stereotypical roles for females, as portrayed in the media, below: • • • •
  8. Key study alert! Williams (1986) Williams cont… Method: 1. Where were the children in this study living? 2. What were they being given for the first time? 3. What did he measure at the beginning of the study and again 2 years later? Results (complete the sentence): After having access to television for 2 years, the children were more….. Conclusion (complete the sentence): Gender is learnt by….. Evaluation of Williams (1986) Strengths Weaknesses This was conducted in a natural setting. Why is that good? Why is it an issue that all the kids in the study were from Canada? The children were studied over a long period of time. Why is this good? Could anything else have caused these results? Aim: to investigate the effects of television on gender development in children
  9. Evaluation of the social learning theory of gender development Strengths Weaknesses The theory believes that behaviour is learnt, so it ignores all biological differences between males and females The gender schema theory of gender development (the third and final one!) A schema is a mental building block of knowledge. For example, if I said “I cut down a tree yesterday”, you would probably imagine that I used a saw/axe, that the tree was planted in the ground, that it fell to the floor when I cut it and that the trunk was brown and the leaves were green (unless I told you this in autumn, in which case you might imagine the leaves to be orange. The point is, we don’t need to hear all of the information in order to understand a situation, and this is because of our schemas. Schemas help us to understand and organise information. It doesn’t explain how children brought up in one-parent families without a strong same-sex role model do not have any difficulty developing their gender. The theory is well supported by research. Many studies show that children learn their gender through observing and imitating role models. It doesn’t explain why 2 children of the same gender, brought up in the same home with the same role models, can behave very differently. Anything else? A gender schema is….
  10. Gender schemas include a lot of gender stereotypes. Children learn about gender from what they see and experience (Disney has a lot to answer for!). Initially, children’s gender stereotypes are quite fixed, but as they get older they get a little more flexible. Have you ever heard someone say “you throw like a girl”? That’s because some people hold a gender stereotype that says girls can’t throw very well. Children know more about their own gender, but know less about the other gender. Once children are able to label themselves as a boy/girl, they learn which objects, activities and behaviours are associated with each sex. List 1 gender role that is considered as male and 1 gender role that is considered as female: • • E.g. it is ‘normal’ for men to propose in our culture, but it is ‘normal’ for women to propose in the Biddus Islands off Western Africa (and the men aren’t allowed to refuse!) Key study alert! Martin (1989) Aim: To show that c…………………. understanding of g……………… becomes less stereotyped and therefore more f………………….. as they get older. Method: Children heard s……………….. about the toys that m…………….. and f…………………. characters enjoyed playing with. Some characters were said to like g……………….-s…………………………. activities, whilst others were said to like n…………-g………………….-s………………………… activities. The children were then asked to p…………………. what other toys each character would like/dislike. A gender stereotype is…. A gender role is….
  11. Results: The younger children used only the s…………. of the character to decide what toys he/she would like/dislike. For example, they would say the boy liked playing with t…………………….. even if they had been told he liked playing with d……………….. . The older children considered both the s………….. of the character and the other t…………… they liked playing with. For example, they would say that a g……………. who liked playing with trucks probably wouldn’t like playing with d……………….. . Conclusion: Older children have a more f…………………… view of gender than y………………………… children do. Do all children develop gender schemas in the same way? No! There are differences. Some children hold such strong gender stereotypes that they ignore or forget information that doesn’t fit with their gender schemas. A child who is less gender stereotyped would be more likely to remember information about gender roles accurately. Evaluating the gender schema theory of gender development This is a very detailed theory and it also has ‘intuitive appeal’, which means that it does fit with our experiences of how gender develops. This theory cannot explain the following: • • • A child who is highly stereotyped would be likely to remember this male nurse as a doctor, or even change the information so that they recall a female nurse. This is so that the information is in line with their gender schema.
  12. Sex and Gender key terms glossary Social influence Obedience Now highlight the KEY WORDS in the definition that will help you to remember it. List 3 authority figures, along with an example of an order they might issue: • • • Obedience has been studied in lab settings (artificial) and natural settings. Complete the table below, using happy and sad faces. Lab experiment Field experiment Reliability (can we repeat the study and get the same results? HINT: the more controlled the experiment is, the more likely we can repeat it and get the same results) Ecological validity (is the setting in which the experiment took place natural (high eco validity) or artificial (low eco validity)?) Control of extraneous variables (is there anything Obedience is….
  13. else that could have affected the results e.g. distractions, noise, lighting, time of day etc.) You can use these terms to evaluate most of the studies you learn! Remember, you must relate them to the specific study e.g. a weakness of the study is that it has low ecological validity because the participants carried out the task of issuing electric shocks in a lab environment, which is very artificial. Other key terms to use when evaluating: • Generalisable – who were the participants? If the sample was very small/only from one area/only one age/only one sex, you can argue that the results are not generalizable to the wider population • Ethical – were participants deceived? Did they give informed consent? Did they suffer any harm? Did they have the right to withdraw? • Applicable – do the results apply to anything in the real world? Key study alert! Milgram (1963) Aim: to see how far people would obey an unreasonable order. Method: ………….. male participants volunteered to take part in what they thought was a m………………… and l…………………….. experiment. They thought they were giving e…………………………. s……………………. to a ‘learner’, who was actually a confederate (actor), every time he got an answer wrong. The participant (who played the ‘t…………………….’) was sat in front of a shock generator that ranged from ………….volts to …………..volts (in intervals of 15V). The learner had to remember p…………….. of words and was given a shock every time they made a mistake. The learner expressed pain through a tape recording, but eventually fell silent. Whenever the participant wanted to stop, the experimenter would say things like “…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………” Results: Professionals thought that no more than ……..% of the participants would go to …………… volts. However, all participants delivered ………….. volt shocks and ……………..% went all the way to …………. volts, despite being so distressed that some even had seizures.
  14. Conclusion: People are prepared to obey very unreasonable o………………… if they believe the person giving them is in a position of a………………………….. . The findings have been replicated and are therefore considered reliable. The findings can explain why the Nazis carried out horrific acts on the Jews. Generalisable? Ecological validity? Ethical? Milgram’s study into obedience was conducted in a very artificial environment. Now let’s look at a field experiment that was conducted in a natural setting….. Key study alert! Bickman (1974) Aim: To see if people would be more likely to obey an order if it came from someone wearing u……………………….. Method: Actors were either dressed as a s………………………. g………………. or just in a casual jacket. They each asked people setting in a p…………….. to pick up some l………………… Results: ……………% of people obeyed the g…………….. compared with ……………% when the actor wasn’t wearing uniform. Conclusion: Wearing a uniform makes people think that they are an a……………………….. f…………………..
  15. Why do people obey? Match the key terms to the explanations Socialisation Participants couldn’t see victim so they were shielded from their actions. Legitimate authority Shocks started low and increased gradually in small steps. It was therefore hard to know when to draw the line. Gradual commitment Throughout our lives, we are always taught to obey authority figures. Buffers The experimenter was wearing a lab coat and the experiment was conducted at a prestigious university. Participants may have therefore put their faith in the experimenter and trusted them. Not feeling responsible The participants were acting on behalf of someone else. They may have felt like they weren’t to blame. Conformity Highlight the KEY WORDS that will help you to remember this definition. Key study alert! Asch (1951) Aim: To see whether people could be influenced by other people’s opinions to give an answer they knew to be wrong – to conform. Method: Participants were shown sets of 4 l……………….. and they had to say whether the line matched line A, B or C. Participants were tested alone and as part of a g…………………. , who were instructed to sometimes give incorrect answers. Results: On …………..% of the trials where the test group gave the wrong answers, the participants conformed and gave the same wrong answer. …………..% of participants gave at least 1 wrong answer. Conclusion: Those who gave incorrect answers admitted afterwards that they knew their answers were w…………………. , so they were clearly demonstrating normative s………………….. i…………………………. Strengths Weaknesses Conformity is…. An example of the lines used by Asch:
  16. Control? Artificial setting? Variations of the study? Use of confederates? Why do people conform? Ambiguous decision – We want to be right, but sometimes we are unsure of what to do or say. We therefore look to others as we assume they’re correct, so we copy them. E.g. if you are at a super posh dinner and there are multiple knives and forks on the table, you might look to others to see which one to use and copy them. Normative social influence – We want to be liked and accepted by the rest of the group, so we are likely to do and say things that make us popular within that group. Other factors that affect conformity… (delete < or > as appropriate) Large group Small group Other people disagree with majority No one disagrees with majority Deindividuation What key words should we underline here so that we remember the definition? Have you ever noticed how people behave very differently in groups/crowds? In a crowd, we tend to lose our sense of individuality – our personality, our values, our sense of right and wrong, and any feelings of responsibility. </> </> Deindividuation is….
  17. In order to punish someone for their actions, we have to be able to identify them. However, in a crowd, we become anonymous. Match the factors that affect deindividuation to their explanations below: Anonymity In many ways, the uniform we wear dictates to us how we behave. We follow the norms and rules set out for people within that role. For example, we expect doctors to behave as doctors and policemen to behave as policemen. Wearing uniform People expect us to behave like others in our group. We therefore behave like the group we are in rather than like an individual. We also adopt the mood of the crowd and change our behaviour accordingly. Being part of a group If you cannot be identified, the threat of punishment is removed. When our identities are concealed, we therefore behave in ways that we would not if we could be identified. Key study alert! Zimbardo (1969) Aim: To see if people in a b……….. c…………….. behave in a more a……………………… way than people in a s………………. t……………. Method: He parked a c………….. in each place with its bonnet up, like it had broken down, and o………………………… what people did as they passed by. Results: Straight away, people began stealing parts off the car in N………… Y…………….., and within ……….. weeks there was very little of the car left. In the small town, the only time the car was touched was when someone lowered the b………………. to stop the engine getting wet. Conclusion: Living in a big city leads to an increase in a………………………………… b…………………………….. due to deindividuation. Evaluation of Asch’s study Strengths Weaknesses Ecological validity Generalisable?
  18. Practical applications: CCTV Controlled? Reliable? Social loafing What key words should we underline in this definition? When a group of people are performing a task together, every person is being helped by others. This means it is not possible to identify an individual person’s performance, so they don’t work as hard as they would on their own. Key study alert! Latané et al (1979) Aim: To see whether being in a g…………………… would have an effect on how much e…………………. participants put into a task. Method: 84 participants were asked to shout and clap as loudly as they could whilst alone or in groups of up to 6. Each participant wore h………………………………. so they couldn’t hear the others. Results: The larger the group size, the l……………. noise participants made. Conclusion: People put less e……………… into a task when they know others are contributing effort than when they are the only one. Social loafing is…. Ever wondered why teachers don’t like you working in groups of more than 3?! Ever wondered why teachers don’t like you working in groups of more than 3?!
  19. Evaluation of Latané What factors affect social loafing? Group size: Latané et al.’s study above shows that group size affects social loafing. People in larger groups put in less effort than those in smaller groups. People don’t work as hard because it is harder to identify an individual’s performance when they’re working in a group. Nature of task: People who are motivated to complete the task to the best of their ability will work harder within their team. For example, if you played for a Premier League football club, you would be unlikely to go onto the pitch and give 40%. However, if you were part of a team who had been asked to clean this house, you might put less effort in and let others do the majority of the work. Culture: Some cultures are collectivist (put the needs of the group above the needs of the individual), whilst others are individualist (put the needs of the individual above those of the group). Earley’s (1989) study showed that social loafing does not exist in all cultures. In their study, Americans reduced their effort when working in a group, whereas Chinese people did not. Bystander intervention A bystander is someone who is present at an event or incident, but who does not take part. A big part of the social influence topic look at why people do or do not step in and help when people are in need. There are 4 key studies in this area! Match the bystander intervention key terms to their definitions:
  20. Key study alert! Latané and Darley (1968) Complete the storyboard below Aim: to see if people are less likely to react in an emergency when others are present Method: Participants sat in a room alone or in threes while completing a questionnaire Method cont: Whilst participants were doing this, smoke began pouring into the room Results: 75% of those sitting alone went to tell someone within 6 minutes Results cont: Only 38% of those in groups of 3 went to tell someone in that time Conclusion: When others are around, we’re less likely to react in an emergency Strengths: • tight control • Shows how diffusion of responsibility can affect our behaviour Weaknesses: • lab setting Empathy Bystander apathy Diffusion of responsibility Altruism Helping someone without thinking of yourself. This may have a great cost to yourself (e.g. running into the road to push a pram out of the way of a speeding car. Being able to put yourself in someone else’s shoes and understand how that person might be feeling. E.g. seeing a victim of bullying and understanding how this might be affecting them. Doing nothing in an emergency when someone is in need of help. The feeling that, when in a group, there is less need to act because someone else who is present could also do something.
  21. Highlight the 2 factors from the list below that may have influenced the participants’ behaviour: • Presence of others • Appearance of the victim • Diffusion of responsibility Key study alert! Piliavin (1972) Aim: To see if the a…………………………….. of the victim would influence helping behaviour. Method: An actor pretended to c………………………. in a train carriage. His appearance was altered several times (e.g. sometimes he was drunk, sometimes he looked homeless) and the amount of help he received was recorded by an o…………………………., who was also sat in the train carriage. Results: The amount of help offered within 70 seconds varied depending on the actor’s appearance. When he was carrying a w…………………… s…………………., he was helped 90% of the time. When he had a facial scar, this dropped to ……………….% and when he appeared drunk, it dropped further to ………….. %. Conclusion: The appearance of the person needing help affects whether or not they get that help and how quickly they get it. Highlight the factors below that you think could have affected the helping behaviour in this study: • Empathy • How much someone had eaten • Appearance of the victim • Altruism • Whether the passenger was knitting • Diffusion of responsibility • Presence of others • Similarity of the victim to the bystanders • Whether or not they felt capable of helping them • The risk of helping Evaluation of Piliavin – explain why the factors below are strengths or weaknesses Field experiment Low control
  22. High ecological validity Not reliable Key study alert! Bateson et al (1983) Bateson also shows how the characteristics of a victim can impact on whether they receive help or not. Aim: To discover if the s…………………………………. of a victim to the bystander will affect whether of not they receive help. Method: Participants watch a w……………. who they thought was receiving e………………….. s………………. Each participant was made to think that the woman was either like themselves or not like themselves. They were then given the opportunity to take the woman’s place in order to stop her s…………………………………… Results: More participants were prepared to take the p…………….. of the w……………… they thought to be s………………………… to themselves than d……………………………….. Conclusion: People are more likely to offer help to someone they feel they can relate to than someone they can’t. Bateson said this is because we feel greater e……………………………. for people like ourselves, so it causes us more d…………………….. to see them suffering. Helping them relieves us from our distress.
  23. Evaluating Bateson’s study – complete the sentences Key study alert: Schroeder et al. (1995) Aim: To explore different reasons for bystanders not helping. Method: They studied the findings and conclusions from many previous pieces of research. This is known as a meta-analysis. Results: They were able to provide an alternative explanation for why bystanders did nothing to help when others were present. Conclusion: Bystanders are distressed and concerned about victims but, when other people are present, they believe that someone else may be more capable of helping, or can help more easily than they can themselves. Strengths Weaknesses • Combines the data from lots of studies so provides a detailed explanation of why people don’t intervene • Includes data from many different places and populations, therefore the results are • The studies included in this meta-analysis would have had weaknesses of their own e.g. lacking ecological validity etc. All of the participants were female. This is a problem because… This study can be seen as unethical because… This study was conducted in a laboratory. This is a weakness because… The study was conducted in a controlled setting. This is good because… So we’re not all evil! Maybe we’re just lacking in confidence! So we’re not all evil! Maybe we’re just lacking in confidence!
  24. more generalisable. Practical implications of research into social influence – you need to know at least two Practical implications are suggestions about behaviour in the real world beyond the research study, based upon what psychologists have discovered. In other words, what do these studies help us to understand? Top tip! If writing a practical implication, start the sentence with “it helps us to understand” or “it helps to explain why”. This will ensure you’re writing an implication and not an application! Create a mind map to include practical implications of research into social loafing. Remember, write concisely – only include key information! One has been done for you… Practical implications of research into social influence Practical implications of research into social influence Research into conformity helps us to understand why, if 11 out of 12 members of the jury find someone guilty, the remaining individual is likely to agree with them, even if privately they believe otherwise.
  25. That’s it! Well done!!! If you would like to make a Social Influence key terms glossary, you would find it incredibly useful.
Anzeige