SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
1
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
CAUSE NO. DC-20-13604
JACQUELYN MEDINA,
Plaintiff,
v.
HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation dba HYATT REGENCY DFW,
AB/FH DFW PROPERTY, LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company, and THE
SERVICES COMPANIES, a Florida
Corporation,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
116th
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
DEFENDANTS HYATT CORPORATION dba HYATT REGENCY DFW, AB/FH DFW
PROPERTY, LLC, AND THE SERVICES COMPANIES’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
COME NOW, Hyatt Corporation, d/b/a, Hyatt Regency DFW, AB/FH DFW Property,
LLC, and The Services Companies (hereinafter “Defendants”) in the above-entitled cause, and file
their Original Answer and would respectfully show as follows:
I.
GENERAL DENIAL
Defendants generally deny each and every, all and singular, the claims and allegations
contained in Plaintiff’s Petition and all supplements, modifications and amendments thereto, and
demand strict proof thereof by a preponderance of the credible evidence pursuant to TEX. R. CIV.
P. 92.
FILED
10/23/2020 4:06 PM
FELICIA PITRE
DISTRICT CLERK
DALLAS CO., TEXAS
Darling Tellez DEPUTY
2
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
II.
DEFENSES
1. Sole Proximate Cause. Defendants assert that, with respect to the occurrence in
question, the negligence, fault, acts and/or omissions of persons not a party to the suit were the
sole proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any, and without which, Plaintiff’s
injuries and/or damages would not have occurred, or in the alternative, said negligence, fault, acts
and/or omissions were a contributing proximate cause of this occurrence and Plaintiff’s injuries
and/or damages, if any.
2. No act or omission attributable to Defendants constitutes a proximate cause of any
injury and/or damage to Plaintiff. Defendants further assert the injuries and/or damages
complained of were not foreseeable, nor was any act or omission, allegedly attributable to
Defendants, a cause-in-fact of any injuries or damages to Plaintiff.
3. Plaintiff’s Fault. Defendants further aver Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any,
were proximately caused, in whole or in part, by Plaintiff’s own acts and omissions, each and all
of which were a proximate, producing, or new and independent cause of the alleged damages.
4. Contributory Negligence. Defendants allege that Plaintiff was contributorily
negligent and/or intentionally, willfully and wantonly negligent on the day in question. Defendants
further alleges that Plaintiff’s negligence was the proximate cause, or alternatively, the producing
cause of all injuries and/or damages allegedly suffered by Plaintiff. Defendants allege that the
conduct of Plaintiff in failing to use ordinary care for her safety and welfare was fifty-one (51%)
percent or more of the cause of the alleged injuries and/or damages, if any.
5. Failure to Mitigate Damages. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff has failed to
mitigate her damages as required by law.
3
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
6. Third parties. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff’s alleged injuries and/or
damages, if any, were proximately caused in whole or in part by the acts and omissions of third
parties over whom Defendants had no control or right to control.
7. New and Independent Cause. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff’s injuries
and/or damages, if any, were not the cause of any act or omission on the part of Defendant, but
rather were the result of acts or omissions of a separate and independent agency, not reasonably
foreseeable to Defendants which altered the natural sequence of events and over which Defendants
had no control.
8. Paid or Incurred Medical Expenses. Defendants invoke the limitation on liability
for medical or health care expenses as provided by section 41.0105 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE
& REMEDIES CODE. Specifically, Plaintiff is limited to recovery of medical or health care expenses
actually paid or incurred by or on behalf of Plaintiff.
9. Pre-judgment Interest Limitations. Defendants hereby invoke its entitlement to all
definitions, instructions, defenses and limitations provided by Chapter 41 of the TEXAS CIVIL
PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE, including but not limited to, sections 41.008, and 41.0105.
10. Reasonable and Necessary Medical Expenses. Defendants would further show that
the medical treatment claimed by Plaintiff was excessive and unnecessary and that the medical
expenses claimed were unreasonable and unnecessary and were not proximately caused by the
accident made basis of this lawsuit.
11. Rights. Defendants invoke all rights, remedies and elections afforded them pursuant
to Chapters 32 and 33 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE regarding contribution,
indemnity, comparative and/or proportionate responsibility to the extent the same are or may be
applicable.
4
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
12. Settlement, Credit, Reduction. If any defendant or third-party settles, or has settled,
or is otherwise dismissed prior to judgment, Defendants reserve the right to pursue a credit,
percentage reduction, or any of the relief to which he may be entitled with respect to any such
settlement or any other settlement between Plaintiff and any other person or entity who has paid
or promised to pay money or anything of monetary value to Plaintiff at any time in consideration
for limiting or eliminating any potential liability arising out of or relating to the events from which
this suit arises. Further, Defendants assert their right to a credit and to make an election of credit
for purposes of any settlement entered into with any other defendant, tortfeasor, or other party,
pursuant to §33.014 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE.
13. Reservation. Defendants reserve the right to amend, supplement and add
affirmative defenses and/or assert any counter-claims, cross-claims or third-party claims that
discovery may reveal.
III.
JURY DEMAND
Defendants join in Plaintiff’s request for a jury in this case.
IV.
REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194, Plaintiff is requested to disclose, within
thirty (30) days of service of this request, the information or material described in Texas Rule of
Civil Procedure 194.2(a) – (l).
V.
SELF AUTHENTICATION NOTICE
Defendants hereby give notice in accordance with Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil
Procedure that any and all documents produced during discovery may be used against the
5
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
producing parties at any pre-trial proceeding and/or trial of this matter without the necessity of
authenticating the document.
VI.
PRAYER
Defendants respectfully pray Plaintiff takes nothing by reason of his suit here in, and that
Defendants recover their costs.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Brittany Davis
CHRISTINE BURKHART
Bar No. 24102731
Christine.Burkhart@wilsonelser.com
BRITTANY DAVIS
Bar No. 24093404
Brittany.Davis@wilsonelser.com
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER, L.L.P.
Bank of America Plaza
901 Main Street, Suite 4800
Dallas, Texas 75202
Telephone: (214) 698-8000
Facsimile: (214) 698-1101
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
6
DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER
1662805V.1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on all parties
and/or their counsel of record in accordance with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21 and 21a on
the 23rd
day of October 2020.
Ramona Ladwig e-served: ramona@kazlg.com
Mohammad Kazerouni e-served: mike@kazlg.com
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 14155
Dallas, TX 75201
800-400-6808
800-520-5523 (fax)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Brittany Davis
Attorney
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Pam Lamper on behalf of Brittany Davis
Bar No. 24093404
pamela.lamper@wilsonelser.com
Envelope ID: 47487648
Status as of 10/26/2020 2:47 PM CST
Case Contacts
Name
RAMONA LADWIG
Christine Burkhart
Brittany Davis
Efile Las Vegas
Pam Lamper
BarNumber Email
ramona@kazlg.com
christine.burkhart@wilsonelser.com
brittany.davis@wilsonelser.colm
EfileLasVegas.@wilsonelser.com
pamela.lamper@wilslonelser.com
TimestampSubmitted
10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM
10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM
10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM
10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM
10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM
Status
SENT
SENT
ERROR
ERROR
ERROR

More Related Content

What's hot

Settlement agreement en
Settlement agreement enSettlement agreement en
Settlement agreement enNorman Gates
 
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens - the Arizona Settlement
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens -  the Arizona SettlementThe Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens -  the Arizona Settlement
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens - the Arizona SettlementBehn Wyetzner, Chartered
 
2012 presentation dpw liens
2012 presentation dpw liens2012 presentation dpw liens
2012 presentation dpw liensJoe Chapman
 
Viridian preliminary settlement agreement
Viridian preliminary settlement agreementViridian preliminary settlement agreement
Viridian preliminary settlement agreementHindenburg Research
 
Dayton Day Tennis 2014
Dayton Day Tennis 2014Dayton Day Tennis 2014
Dayton Day Tennis 2014City of Dayton
 
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Aaron A. Martinez
 
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintPennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintJames Yoke
 
Worley v. YMCA
Worley v. YMCAWorley v. YMCA
Worley v. YMCAmzamoralaw
 
Personal Injury Complaint
Personal Injury ComplaintPersonal Injury Complaint
Personal Injury ComplaintNicole Williams
 
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christie
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon ChristieDisability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christie
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christielupusdmv
 

What's hot (13)

Settlement agreement en
Settlement agreement enSettlement agreement en
Settlement agreement en
 
April 2015 2nd Department Updates
April 2015 2nd Department UpdatesApril 2015 2nd Department Updates
April 2015 2nd Department Updates
 
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens - the Arizona Settlement
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens -  the Arizona SettlementThe Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens -  the Arizona Settlement
The Qui Tam Lawsuit Against Walgreens - the Arizona Settlement
 
2012 presentation dpw liens
2012 presentation dpw liens2012 presentation dpw liens
2012 presentation dpw liens
 
Viridian preliminary settlement agreement
Viridian preliminary settlement agreementViridian preliminary settlement agreement
Viridian preliminary settlement agreement
 
Dayton Day Tennis 2014
Dayton Day Tennis 2014Dayton Day Tennis 2014
Dayton Day Tennis 2014
 
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
 
Immigration ruling
Immigration rulingImmigration ruling
Immigration ruling
 
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintPennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
 
Worley v. YMCA
Worley v. YMCAWorley v. YMCA
Worley v. YMCA
 
Personal Injury Complaint
Personal Injury ComplaintPersonal Injury Complaint
Personal Injury Complaint
 
Dental claim form
Dental claim formDental claim form
Dental claim form
 
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christie
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon ChristieDisability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christie
Disability for Lupus Seminar Sharon Christie
 

Similar to Defendants answer to pettion

SampleComplaintCivPro1
SampleComplaintCivPro1SampleComplaintCivPro1
SampleComplaintCivPro1Tanvir Hossain
 
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale BlTatianaMajor22
 
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community Association
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community Association
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue
 
UB04 EXAMPLE JONES
UB04 EXAMPLE JONESUB04 EXAMPLE JONES
UB04 EXAMPLE JONESEbony Holden
 
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’s
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’sProfessional liability insurance application for medical director’s
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’sevaj171
 
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between  ...Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between  ...
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...legal2
 
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie MattoxRob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattoxtallahasseeobserver
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)VogelDenise
 
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesPLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesJoshua Desautels
 
Block and Landsman Award - Burlew
Block and Landsman Award - BurlewBlock and Landsman Award - Burlew
Block and Landsman Award - Burlewblocklandsman
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)Daniel Alouidor
 

Similar to Defendants answer to pettion (20)

SampleComplaintCivPro1
SampleComplaintCivPro1SampleComplaintCivPro1
SampleComplaintCivPro1
 
Pi014
Pi014Pi014
Pi014
 
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl
1 TO Plaintiff Weltee Wolo, Pro Se, 3140 Northdale Bl
 
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community Association
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community Association
Angela Kaaihue -vs- Newtown Estates Community Association
 
UB04 EXAMPLE JONES
UB04 EXAMPLE JONESUB04 EXAMPLE JONES
UB04 EXAMPLE JONES
 
Doc 105
Doc 105Doc 105
Doc 105
 
Doc 105
Doc 105Doc 105
Doc 105
 
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’s
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’sProfessional liability insurance application for medical director’s
Professional liability insurance application for medical director’s
 
Athletico presentation
Athletico presentationAthletico presentation
Athletico presentation
 
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between  ...Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between  ...
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...
 
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie MattoxRob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
 
Lederman v king standing decision
Lederman v king standing decisionLederman v king standing decision
Lederman v king standing decision
 
NF3
NF3NF3
NF3
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
 
Doc. 87
Doc. 87Doc. 87
Doc. 87
 
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)
012909 answer&counterclaim (stor-all vs newsome)
 
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesPLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
 
Block and Landsman Award - Burlew
Block and Landsman Award - BurlewBlock and Landsman Award - Burlew
Block and Landsman Award - Burlew
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.54.0 (3)
 

Recently uploaded

3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.pptseri bangash
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersPhilippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersJillianAsdala
 
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULEsreeramsaipranitha
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationKhushdeep Kaur
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdfSUSHMITAPOTHAL
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteDeepikaK245113
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxSHIVAMGUPTA671167
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxRRR Chambers
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubham Wadhonkar
 
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURYA SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURYJulian Scutts
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理Airst S
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxfilippoluciani9
 
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdfHely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdfBritto Valan
 
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理bd2c5966a56d
 
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation StrategySmarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation StrategyJong Hyuk Choi
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMollyBrown86
 

Recently uploaded (20)

3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
 
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersPhilippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
 
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫瑞瓦特大学毕业证如何办理
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
 
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURYA SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
 
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdfHely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
 
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
 
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation StrategySmarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 

Defendants answer to pettion

  • 1. 1 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 CAUSE NO. DC-20-13604 JACQUELYN MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation dba HYATT REGENCY DFW, AB/FH DFW PROPERTY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and THE SERVICES COMPANIES, a Florida Corporation, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 116th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS HYATT CORPORATION dba HYATT REGENCY DFW, AB/FH DFW PROPERTY, LLC, AND THE SERVICES COMPANIES’ ORIGINAL ANSWER COME NOW, Hyatt Corporation, d/b/a, Hyatt Regency DFW, AB/FH DFW Property, LLC, and The Services Companies (hereinafter “Defendants”) in the above-entitled cause, and file their Original Answer and would respectfully show as follows: I. GENERAL DENIAL Defendants generally deny each and every, all and singular, the claims and allegations contained in Plaintiff’s Petition and all supplements, modifications and amendments thereto, and demand strict proof thereof by a preponderance of the credible evidence pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 92. FILED 10/23/2020 4:06 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Darling Tellez DEPUTY
  • 2. 2 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 II. DEFENSES 1. Sole Proximate Cause. Defendants assert that, with respect to the occurrence in question, the negligence, fault, acts and/or omissions of persons not a party to the suit were the sole proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any, and without which, Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages would not have occurred, or in the alternative, said negligence, fault, acts and/or omissions were a contributing proximate cause of this occurrence and Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any. 2. No act or omission attributable to Defendants constitutes a proximate cause of any injury and/or damage to Plaintiff. Defendants further assert the injuries and/or damages complained of were not foreseeable, nor was any act or omission, allegedly attributable to Defendants, a cause-in-fact of any injuries or damages to Plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff’s Fault. Defendants further aver Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any, were proximately caused, in whole or in part, by Plaintiff’s own acts and omissions, each and all of which were a proximate, producing, or new and independent cause of the alleged damages. 4. Contributory Negligence. Defendants allege that Plaintiff was contributorily negligent and/or intentionally, willfully and wantonly negligent on the day in question. Defendants further alleges that Plaintiff’s negligence was the proximate cause, or alternatively, the producing cause of all injuries and/or damages allegedly suffered by Plaintiff. Defendants allege that the conduct of Plaintiff in failing to use ordinary care for her safety and welfare was fifty-one (51%) percent or more of the cause of the alleged injuries and/or damages, if any. 5. Failure to Mitigate Damages. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages as required by law.
  • 3. 3 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 6. Third parties. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff’s alleged injuries and/or damages, if any, were proximately caused in whole or in part by the acts and omissions of third parties over whom Defendants had no control or right to control. 7. New and Independent Cause. Defendants further allege that Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, if any, were not the cause of any act or omission on the part of Defendant, but rather were the result of acts or omissions of a separate and independent agency, not reasonably foreseeable to Defendants which altered the natural sequence of events and over which Defendants had no control. 8. Paid or Incurred Medical Expenses. Defendants invoke the limitation on liability for medical or health care expenses as provided by section 41.0105 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE. Specifically, Plaintiff is limited to recovery of medical or health care expenses actually paid or incurred by or on behalf of Plaintiff. 9. Pre-judgment Interest Limitations. Defendants hereby invoke its entitlement to all definitions, instructions, defenses and limitations provided by Chapter 41 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE, including but not limited to, sections 41.008, and 41.0105. 10. Reasonable and Necessary Medical Expenses. Defendants would further show that the medical treatment claimed by Plaintiff was excessive and unnecessary and that the medical expenses claimed were unreasonable and unnecessary and were not proximately caused by the accident made basis of this lawsuit. 11. Rights. Defendants invoke all rights, remedies and elections afforded them pursuant to Chapters 32 and 33 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE regarding contribution, indemnity, comparative and/or proportionate responsibility to the extent the same are or may be applicable.
  • 4. 4 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 12. Settlement, Credit, Reduction. If any defendant or third-party settles, or has settled, or is otherwise dismissed prior to judgment, Defendants reserve the right to pursue a credit, percentage reduction, or any of the relief to which he may be entitled with respect to any such settlement or any other settlement between Plaintiff and any other person or entity who has paid or promised to pay money or anything of monetary value to Plaintiff at any time in consideration for limiting or eliminating any potential liability arising out of or relating to the events from which this suit arises. Further, Defendants assert their right to a credit and to make an election of credit for purposes of any settlement entered into with any other defendant, tortfeasor, or other party, pursuant to §33.014 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE. 13. Reservation. Defendants reserve the right to amend, supplement and add affirmative defenses and/or assert any counter-claims, cross-claims or third-party claims that discovery may reveal. III. JURY DEMAND Defendants join in Plaintiff’s request for a jury in this case. IV. REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194, Plaintiff is requested to disclose, within thirty (30) days of service of this request, the information or material described in Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194.2(a) – (l). V. SELF AUTHENTICATION NOTICE Defendants hereby give notice in accordance with Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure that any and all documents produced during discovery may be used against the
  • 5. 5 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 producing parties at any pre-trial proceeding and/or trial of this matter without the necessity of authenticating the document. VI. PRAYER Defendants respectfully pray Plaintiff takes nothing by reason of his suit here in, and that Defendants recover their costs. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brittany Davis CHRISTINE BURKHART Bar No. 24102731 Christine.Burkhart@wilsonelser.com BRITTANY DAVIS Bar No. 24093404 Brittany.Davis@wilsonelser.com WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, L.L.P. Bank of America Plaza 901 Main Street, Suite 4800 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone: (214) 698-8000 Facsimile: (214) 698-1101 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
  • 6. 6 DEFENDANTS’ ORIGINAL ANSWER 1662805V.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on all parties and/or their counsel of record in accordance with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21 and 21a on the 23rd day of October 2020. Ramona Ladwig e-served: ramona@kazlg.com Mohammad Kazerouni e-served: mike@kazlg.com KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 14155 Dallas, TX 75201 800-400-6808 800-520-5523 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Brittany Davis Attorney
  • 7. Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Pam Lamper on behalf of Brittany Davis Bar No. 24093404 pamela.lamper@wilsonelser.com Envelope ID: 47487648 Status as of 10/26/2020 2:47 PM CST Case Contacts Name RAMONA LADWIG Christine Burkhart Brittany Davis Efile Las Vegas Pam Lamper BarNumber Email ramona@kazlg.com christine.burkhart@wilsonelser.com brittany.davis@wilsonelser.colm EfileLasVegas.@wilsonelser.com pamela.lamper@wilslonelser.com TimestampSubmitted 10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM 10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM 10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM 10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM 10/23/2020 4:06:04 PM Status SENT SENT ERROR ERROR ERROR