Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)

Praxistage
11. Oct 2021
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)
1 von 28

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

Mag. Franz Waldhofer (Raiffeisen Software)Mag. Franz Waldhofer (Raiffeisen Software)
Mag. Franz Waldhofer (Raiffeisen Software)Praxistage
Matthias Hausegger (Amaris)Matthias Hausegger (Amaris)
Matthias Hausegger (Amaris)Praxistage
Jochen Schafberger (evidanza)Jochen Schafberger (evidanza)
Jochen Schafberger (evidanza)Praxistage
Mag. Georg Bartmann (Land Niederösterreich)Mag. Georg Bartmann (Land Niederösterreich)
Mag. Georg Bartmann (Land Niederösterreich)Praxistage
Peter Hasmann , zSPM (Scheer Austria GmbH)Peter Hasmann , zSPM (Scheer Austria GmbH)
Peter Hasmann , zSPM (Scheer Austria GmbH)Praxistage
Herbert Leberbauer (Informio)Herbert Leberbauer (Informio)
Herbert Leberbauer (Informio)Praxistage

Similar a Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)

PLM Open Hours - Was bedeutet Industrie 4.0 für das PLMPLM Open Hours - Was bedeutet Industrie 4.0 für das PLM
PLM Open Hours - Was bedeutet Industrie 4.0 für das PLMIntelliact AG
Jan Christopher Brandt: Innovations- und Effizienzsprünge in der chemischen I...Jan Christopher Brandt: Innovations- und Effizienzsprünge in der chemischen I...
Jan Christopher Brandt: Innovations- und Effizienzsprünge in der chemischen I...InboundLabs (ex mon.ki inc)
Matthias Kraus: IT-Trends in der Manufacturing-Industrie - was passiert in de...Matthias Kraus: IT-Trends in der Manufacturing-Industrie - was passiert in de...
Matthias Kraus: IT-Trends in der Manufacturing-Industrie - was passiert in de...InboundLabs (ex mon.ki inc)
Webinar – IoT-Connectivity mit SAP und MulticloudWebinar – IoT-Connectivity mit SAP und Multicloud
Webinar – IoT-Connectivity mit SAP und MulticloudTrebing & Himstedt Prozeßautomation GmbH & Co. KG
Robotic Process Automation - DATAGROUP RPA MagazinRobotic Process Automation - DATAGROUP RPA Magazin
Robotic Process Automation - DATAGROUP RPA MagazinChristian Sauter
Smart IndustrySmart Industry
Smart IndustryFutureManagementGroup AG

Similar a Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)(20)

Más de Praxistage

Mag. Marco Gossenreiter, Winfried Machotta (Nutanix)Mag. Marco Gossenreiter, Winfried Machotta (Nutanix)
Mag. Marco Gossenreiter, Winfried Machotta (Nutanix)Praxistage
Mag. Helmut Miernicki (ecoplus Niederösterreichs Wirtschaftsagentur)Mag. Helmut Miernicki (ecoplus Niederösterreichs Wirtschaftsagentur)
Mag. Helmut Miernicki (ecoplus Niederösterreichs Wirtschaftsagentur)Praxistage
Dipl.-Ing. Franz J. Fischbacher (BMÖ, AVL)Dipl.-Ing. Franz J. Fischbacher (BMÖ, AVL)
Dipl.-Ing. Franz J. Fischbacher (BMÖ, AVL)Praxistage
Dipl.-Ing. Werner Plessl (HPE Österreich)Dipl.-Ing. Werner Plessl (HPE Österreich)
Dipl.-Ing. Werner Plessl (HPE Österreich)Praxistage
Sabine Bühn, Bernd Aschauer (Aschauer IT & Business)Sabine Bühn, Bernd Aschauer (Aschauer IT & Business)
Sabine Bühn, Bernd Aschauer (Aschauer IT & Business)Praxistage
Alexander Hein (smartPM.solutions)Alexander Hein (smartPM.solutions)
Alexander Hein (smartPM.solutions)Praxistage

Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Tigges (ThingWorx)

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Our goal is to give customers a Product and Service Advantage Our mission is to provide technology solutions that transform how products are created, operated and serviced. By transform we mean business process transformation - doing things better to help drive your business forward From the creation of your products to the operation of your product, all the way through the service of your product Create: The early stage of the product development process, everything from the design through the collaboration of development team, to the sourcing of products, all the way through to the servicing of products, which comes into play once the product has been sold and is out into the marketplace and you need to either maintain that particular product or you want to add value to it during the product's use Operate: The ability to monitor or control the operation of an asset to determine how the asset is being used, its productivity compared to its peers, if training or safety needs are required and proactively detect break/fix service situations. Operate can be achieved long before achieving product-as-a-service, and sometimes operate is just another service available or bundled with the product asset.  Service: The effective management and delivery of aftersales support services that ensures the customer achieves maximum value over the entire serviceable life of a product which includes installation, maintenance, repair, proactive maintenance and monitoring? Why do you need to transform?
  2. PTC has identified seven major forces, some of which are long-standing while others are more recent, that are transforming manufacturing.    In recent years, leverage from production-centric product strategies has begun to diminish, in part because they have become commonplace. Optimization of manufacturing production processes will have become simply the “price of entry” to compete. The path to true competitive advantage in the modern manufacturing era requires a rethinking of nearly everything - from how products are designed, built, and serviced, to the underlying business models manufacturers employ. Causing the need for this strategic realignment is a set of market forces, which are now converging to accelerate the manufacturing industry’s trajectory toward the “tipping point” of a fundamental transformation.   Understanding the driving forces, their specific impact, and the opportunities they create, reveals the roots of manufacturing transformation and the future of competitive advantage.   DIGITIZATION Replacing analog product and service information with a fully accurate virtual representation that can be easily leveraged across the value chain (engineering, factory floor, service). GLOBALIZATION The general shrinking of the world driven by technology that eliminates economic and geographical divisions and opens new markets. REGULATION Enforcement of governmental rules, non-governmental organization policies and industry standards related to environment, health, safety and trade. PERSONALIZATION Efficiently tailoring products and services to accommodate regional and personal preferences. SOFTWARE-INTENSIVE PRODUCTS Integrated systems of hardware and software capable of sophisticated human-to-machine interaction, diagnostics and service data capture, with additional value delivered through enhancements. SERVITIZATION Fundamental business model shift in which products evolve to integrated “bundles” of services capable of delivering new value continuously throughout the customer experience lifecycle. CONNECTIVITY Pervasive networks of “things” – often mobile – embedded with sensors and individually addressable to enable sophisticated monitoring, control, and communication.
  3. The IoT is comprised of the three core components: A collection of smart, connected products, product systems, and other Things connected through an Internet-like communication infrastructure to a computing infrastructure that are creating new forms of value. And its the Things in the Internet of Things that are driving new value. Data from the product condition, operation, and environment are delivered in real-time enabling capabilities to control, service, and upgrade the product and system performance. But it’s the things in Why connect products (things)? Because it allows to operate service better, operate better, including remotely, and make the products better. Service: The effective management and delivery of aftersales support services that ensures the customer achieves maximum value over the entire serviceable life of a product which includes installation, maintenance, repair, proactive maintenance and monitoring. Operate: The ability to monitor or control the operation of an asset to determine how the asset is being used, its productivity compared to its peers, if training or safety needs are required and proactively detect break/fix service situations. Operate can be achieved long before achieving product-as-a-service, and sometimes operate is just another service available or bundled with the product asset.  Create: The early stage of the product development process, everything from the design through the collaboration of development team, to the sourcing of products, all the way through to the servicing of products, which comes into play once the product has been sold and is out into the marketplace and you need to either maintain that particular product or you want to add value to it during the product's use. For manufacturers (i.e., those in the Things business), these smart, connected products not only have the potential to generate incredible amounts of new value, but also to disrupt the status quo. The capabilities created and data generated by this new generation of smart, connected products requires new thinking about the enterprise applications and the connected ecosystem to optimize current business processes, drive better decision-making, and expand areas of innovation.
  4. Smart, connected products not only impact the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of an industry, but also the boundaries of the industry. The boundaries of competition can shift as functionality expands from one discrete industry to a broader system of products. In this example, we follow the expansion from the farm tractor industry where the manufacturer is responsible for the performance of the product, to the farm machinery system industry where you're tying together the farm tractor, tiller, and harvester products together to optimize the performance of the planting and harvesting, to the smart farm industry where you're getting weather data feeds, working with the seed companies, commodity future, and all of a sudden the seed companies become part of the industry, and weather tracking becomes part of the industry. The result is that the boundaries of each of these industries are permeable and in a state of flux. For a Product System they key thing is to try to correlate the “inputs” from the Tractor, Tillers, and Planters to the “outputs” from the Combine Harvester.  The Combine Harvester is a large expensive self-propelled machine that “combines” the reaping and threshing functions necessary to harvest grain.  Reaping means separating the grain head or ears from the stalk and threshing means separating the kernels of grain from the husks, hulls, and cobs that are in the way.  By using geo-positioning, these Combines now monitor kernel production levels for each small section of a field.  This information is captured in the database in the cloud at harvest time, and the next spring the planting equipment uses this database to determine planting strategy.  At planting time, the Tractor pulls the Tiller (i.e., “plow” or “cultivator”) to prep the soil.  Many Tillers inject nitrogen into the soil as they work it, and the amount of nitrogen injected at each location would be a function of what the harvest was on that spot (e.g., less harvest = more nitrogen).  Then the Tractor pulls the Planter over the prepared soil to plant the new kernels of grain.  The type of seed, and spacing/frequency of kernels would also be a function of what was harvested from that exact spot last fall.  In order to make this all work, the equipment needs to share a common database in the cloud, hence the need for a Product System.  At the System of Systems level, this concept is extended to include fertilization strategy and irrigation strategy as well.  Now I think there's been a tendency in the popular press to jump all the way from, the farm tractor industry to the smart farm industry. [Widening] boundaries can put a farm tractor company well outside their core competencies, because now there are smart farm companies who look like software companies and don't even build tractors.
  5. Produktion: Welches Unternehmen hat denn Ihrer Meinung nach schon mehrere Aspekte des Ansatzes Internet of Things realisiert? im Heppelmann: Ich würde sagen, General Electric ist. GE hat eine Milliarde US-Dollar ausgegeben für das Internet of Things. Sie nennen es nicht Internet der Dinge, sie geben ihm den Namen Industrial Internet. Aber es ist das Gleiche. Produktion: Ist dabei ein Werk besonders vorangeschritten? Jim Heppelmann: Nein. Der Ansatz ist mehr mit dem Thema Service verbunden. GE verkauft große Produkte wie Flugzeug-Turbinen und Generatoren – und dann verkaufen sie Service-Verträge. Sie haben Service-Verträge im Wert von 200 Milliarden US-Dollar abgeschlossen. GE überlegt sich, ob es seine Dienstleistungen ein Prozent effizienter erbringen kann. Das wäre eine Einsparung von zwei Milliarden US-Dollar. Durch die Verbindung von Produkten durch das Internet der Dinge wird diese Effizienzsteigerung um ein Prozent für GE jetzt möglich. Es geht auch mehr. Das ist der Grund, warum GE-CEO Jeffrey Immelt diese Strategie vorgegeben hat. Produktion: Gibt es einen Unterschied zwischen dem Internet of Things in den USA und Industrie 4.0 in Deutschland? Jim Heppelmann: Ja und nein. Ich denke, dass die Konzepte ähnlich sind. Ich glaube, dass die Deutschen immer nur an die Fabrik denken. Sie stellen sich eine intelligente Fabrik vor. Sie denken nicht so sehr darüber nach, ob die intelligente Fabrik auch smarte Produkte produziert.
  6. Es gibt keinen technologischen Unterschied. Mit den selben Technologien können Sie entweder ihre Produktion digitalisieren oder Ihre Produkte zu Smart Connected Products machen. Egal wo Sie anfangen. In der Fabrik oder beim Produkt. Früher oder später werden Sie beides haben, denn eines Seite wird auch immer die andere Seite beeinflussen. Aber wo liegt denn nun der Unterschied zwischen Industrie 4.0 mund Industrial Internet / IOT?
  7. Der Unterschied liegt in der Kultur und den verschiedenen Ansätzen. Es trifft die Kultur der Internetwirtschaft auf die Kulur der traditionellen produzierenden Industrie. In der Industrie werden Produkte mit hoher Qualität desigend und gefertigt, sind auf lange Haltbarkeit ausgelegt und bis ins kleinste geplant und durchengineered. Wenn man erfolreich sein wollte, und das ist die Indusstrie im deutschsprachigen Raum definitiv, dann musste man genau so handeln. Wenn die Produkte die Fabrik verließen mussten sie genau die Anforderungen des Marktes treffen, denn nachträglich waren kaum Änderungen am Produkt möglich. Internet Firmen haben eher einen Trial and Error Ansatz. Produkte gehen mit wenig Funktionalität in den Markt und werden suksessive via SW Updates mit neuen Funktionen erweitert und geben permanent Rückmeldung über Nutzung und Nutzer. Dieser Ansatz funktioniert mit SW Produkten und funktioniert noch besser mit webbasierten Produkten. Dadurch das die heutigen Produkte immer SW lastiger werden und jetzt auch noch vernetzt sind, können diese Firmen ihre Ansätze auch in diesem Feld anwenden.
  8. Beispie2: Diskussionsrunde auf der diesjährigen CeBIT zum Thema: IoT und wie sich Geschäftsfelder verändern. Es ging dann um das Thema Assistenzsysteme und dann auch um automatisches Fahren. Automobil Manager: Redet über die Vorteile von IOT basierten Assistenssystemen beim Autofahren und was dies alles für den Autobesitzer schönes mit sich bringt und das das neue Auto dann noch besser ist als alle bisher kaufbaren. Soweit nichts neues. Dann kommt die Sicht des Google Managers: Wir haben gerade in Kalifornien mehr als hundert Autos gekauft als Start um ein neues Beförderungskonzept auszuprobieren. Sie können dann einfach ein Auto per App bestellen und es fährt sie in der Endausbaustufe des Service autonom ans Ziel. Sie haben keine Parkplatzsuche und kommen individuell schneller ans Ziel. Die Fahrzeuge sind 24x7 im Einsatz. Moderator: Dann machen Sie den Taxiunternehmen Konkurrenz? Ja. „Uber“ (https://www.uber.com/) hat ja schon gezeigt das hier Bewegung im Markt ist. Autos werden immer komplexer und damit teuer und müssen besser genutzt/ausgelastet werden. Sie haben ja auch kein Flugzeug oder eine eigene Bahn. (Und hier entgleist dem Automobil Manger das Gesicht…)
  9. Wir stellen fest, technologisch gibt es kaum Unterschiede. Aber es gibt den kulturellen Unterschied und den unterschiedlichen Lösungsansatz der Internetwirtschaft. Und genau diese kulturellen Unterschiede und die andere Herangehensweise der Internetwirtschaft stellt die Herausforderunge für die europäische Industrie dar.
  10. Die alten hirarchischen IT Architekturen lösen sich auf.
  11. Erster Anbieter einer Agrarmanagement Platform Smart, connected products not only impact the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of an industry, but also the boundaries of the industry. The boundaries of competition can shift as functionality expands from one discrete industry to a broader system of products. In this example, we follow the expansion from the farm tractor industry where the manufacturer is responsible for the performance of the product, to the farm machinery system industry where you're tying together the farm tractor, tiller, and harvester products together to optimize the performance of the planting and harvesting, to the smart farm industry where you're getting weather data feeds, working with the seed companies, commodity future, and all of a sudden the seed companies become part of the industry, and weather tracking becomes part of the industry. The result is that the boundaries of each of these industries are permeable and in a state of flux. For a Product System they key thing is to try to correlate the “inputs” from the Tractor, Tillers, and Planters to the “outputs” from the Combine Harvester.  The Combine Harvester is a large expensive self-propelled machine that “combines” the reaping and threshing functions necessary to harvest grain.  Reaping means separating the grain head or ears from the stalk and threshing means separating the kernels of grain from the husks, hulls, and cobs that are in the way.  By using geo-positioning, these Combines now monitor kernel production levels for each small section of a field.  This information is captured in the database in the cloud at harvest time, and the next spring the planting equipment uses this database to determine planting strategy.  At planting time, the Tractor pulls the Tiller (i.e., “plow” or “cultivator”) to prep the soil.  Many Tillers inject nitrogen into the soil as they work it, and the amount of nitrogen injected at each location would be a function of what the harvest was on that spot (e.g., less harvest = more nitrogen).  Then the Tractor pulls the Planter over the prepared soil to plant the new kernels of grain.  The type of seed, and spacing/frequency of kernels would also be a function of what was harvested from that exact spot last fall.  In order to make this all work, the equipment needs to share a common database in the cloud, hence the need for a Product System.  At the System of Systems level, this concept is extended to include fertilization strategy and irrigation strategy as well.  Now I think there's been a tendency in the popular press to jump all the way from, the farm tractor industry to the smart farm industry. [Widening] boundaries can put a farm tractor company well outside their core competencies, because now there are smart farm companies who look like software companies and don't even build tractors.
  12. Was sind die tatsächlichen Anforderungen? Will der Kunde tatsächlich einen ¼ Zoll Bohrer oder will er eigentlich nur ein ¼ Zoll Loch? Will mein Kunde tatsächlich eine Klimnaanlage kaufen und betreiben oder will er nur Kälte bei Bedarf? Für Ferrari oder Porsche ist Google’s neuer Service keine Bedrohung, da deren Produkte andere Kundenbedürfnisse befriedigen.
  13. Eine generelle Antwort gibt es nicht, aber es gibt Dinge die man in beherzigen bzw. die man vermeiden sollte. Nehmen Sie sich des Themas SW und Services an., denn die Wertschöpfung wandert von Hardware zu Software und vom Produkt zu Services. Konzentrieren Si sich dabei auf ihre Kernkompetenzen. Wenn Sie Maschinenbauer sind, versuchen Sie nicht komplette SW Lösungen zu bauen. Sondern bringen Sie Ihr Branchen KnowHow ein und nutzen Sie z.B. eine Plattform, die es Ihnen erlaubt schnell, agil und zukunftssicher IOT Applikationen zu entwickeln ohne Code zu entwickeln. Setzen Sie Ihre knappen IT Ressourcen sinnvoll ein. Nutzen Sie Cloud Technologien um Ihre IT zu entlasten und um schnell agieren zu können. Heutige Plattformen sind flexibel. Sie können falls später notwendig auf eine Hybridlösung wechseln. Sicherheitsrelevante Daten und Anwendungen sind dann bei Ihnen und die nicht sicherheitsrelevanten Teile in der Cloud. Keep it simple. Versuchen Sie nicht die eierlegende Wollmilchsau zu entwickeln. Konzentrieren Sie sich auf einen einfachen Usecase der Ihren Kunden aber schon einen ersten Zusatznutzen bringt. Die heutigen IOT Platformen setzen Sie dazu in die Lage zusätzliche Funktionalität flexibel und schnell nachzureichen. Overengineeren Sie Ihre Lösung nicht. Der Nutzen für den Kunden steht im Vordergrung. Legen Sie los! Warten Sie nicht auf Sandards, Richtlinien und Empfehlungen. Auch hier entlastet Sie eine Plattform. Gibt es einen neuen Standard, wird er der Plattform einfach hinzugefügt und die andere Funktionalität bleibt unangetastet. Denken Sie daran, dass Ihr Mitbewerb aus der Internetwirtschaft nach dem Trial & Error Prinzip handelt. Agieren Sie ähnlich. Je früher Sie anfangen erste Projekte zu realisieren um so mehr lernen Sie und um so größer Ihr Vorsprung vor dem Mittbewerb. Nutzen Sie vorhandene Technologien und schaffen Sie durch Software neuen Nutzen
  14. The Technology piece: PTC has a lot of technology solutions (CAD, ALM, PLM, SLM) and an IoT fabric that connects them for a better together system that delivers time to value, ROI, & lowest risk These solutions enable manufacturers to optimize their business processes throughout the lifecycle and in turn deliver closed-loop lifecycle management We are leaders across these five critical business area, allowing us to drive transformation across the total product lifecycle and enterprise. Our solutions, whether standalone or working together as a system, enable us to transform the way products are created and serviced so our customers can achieve ongoing product and service advantage
  15. This is an alternative to slide 7 in the main deck. Smart, connected products require companies to build and support an entirely new technology infrastructure. This “technology stack” is made up of multiple layers, including new product hardware, embedded software, connectivity, a product cloud consisting of software running on remote servers, a suite of security tools, a gateway for external information sources, and integration with enterprise business systems. Smart, connected products require that companies build an entirely new technology infrastructure, consisting of a series of layers known as a “technology stack” (see the exhibit “The New Technology Stack”). This includes modified hardware, software applications, and an operating system embedded in the product itself; network communications to support connectivity; and a product cloud (software running on the manufacturer’s or a third-party server) containing the product-data database, a platform for building software applications, a rules engine and analytics platform, and smart product applications that are not embedded in the product. Cutting across all the layers is an identity and security structure, a gateway for accessing external data, and tools that connect the data from smart, connected products to other business systems (for example, ERP and CRM systems). This technology enables not only rapid product application development and operation but the collection, analysis, and sharing of the potentially huge amounts of longitudinal data generated inside and outside the products that has never been available before. Building and supporting the technology stack for smart, connected products requires substantial investment and a range of new skills—such as software development, systems engineering, data analytics, and online security expertise—that are rarely found in manufacturing companies.
  16. This is an alternative to slide 8 in the main deck. Over time, PTC has developed or acquired the capabilities to provide you with the most comprehensive technology stack for creating smart, connected products and closed loop lifecycle management
  17. Our success with customers has translated into financial success for PTC. Highlight #1: Success Rate We are one of the fastest growing, large software companies out there. We are a safe company to do business with, a strong company, even after the 2009 economic slump staying profitable. Highlight #2: We are a global company, just like our customers PTC does more revenue outside the US than it does within the US. PTC’s employees are spread worldwide also. Customers who are trying to implement global capabilities they are going to need a global company to partner with who has resources virtually everywhere they do. That is PTC.   Our success starts with our employees, customers and the community we have built around the PTC brand. Give the audience a sense of the size of PTC. 1/3 of our employees are in R&D PTC also has a large services organization because we have process expertise to help extract the most value There are about 100K manufacturing companies total, and 28K used PTC in some capacity.