Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Tagging & Folksonomies poster

1.258 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Veröffentlicht in: Technologie, Bildung
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

Tagging & Folksonomies poster

  1. 1. <ul><li>Tags: terms used to identify resources for retrieval; created and defined by users who are both the providers of content and the end-users </li></ul><ul><li>Folksonomies: composed of user-generated metadata, created by tagging pieces of digital information with their own searchable keywords </li></ul><ul><li>broad: third-party users assign tags to the same content, creating metadata for their bookmarks; sites aggregate this metadata, make it searchable </li></ul><ul><li>narrow: users tag their own content so that they can easily retrieve it and help others find it; useful for assigning metadata to unique content </li></ul><ul><li>Museum/Archival Applications </li></ul><ul><li>Value </li></ul><ul><li>Tagging: dialog between viewer and work as well as viewer and museum </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Encourages personal interpretations of work </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fosters/maintains museum relationships </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Serves altruistic purpose of museums </li></ul></ul><ul><li>steve.museum (www.steve.museum) </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative research project (launched in 2005) that explores the potential for tagging within the context of museums. </li></ul><ul><li>Goals: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Motivate users to tag, guide them through the process, and reward them when done (create prolonged and repeat use by giving users control) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integrate contributed data into local documentation systems to improve access to collections </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Encourage engagement with cultural content </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Traditional Library Applications </li></ul><ul><li>Venues </li></ul><ul><li>Social Networking Sites </li></ul><ul><ul><li>GoodReads </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Information Management Sites </li></ul><ul><ul><li>LibraryThing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>PennTags </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Directions </li></ul><ul><li>Towards a shelfless library </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Items in multiple “locations” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Towards a personal experience </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Evocation of personal feelings </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Movement away from Library-centeredness </li></ul><ul><ul><li>PennTags </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Emergence of Folksonomies </li></ul><ul><li>Traditional subjects reaffirmed </li></ul><ul><li>Traditional facets reaffirmed </li></ul><ul><li>New descriptors emerge </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Personal descriptions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>New representations of the traditional emerge </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Innovative combinations </li></ul></ul>Tagging & Folksonomies Social Applications <ul><li>Value </li></ul><ul><li>User-generated vocabulary based on personal understanding of object </li></ul><ul><li>“ Placing Hooks” </li></ul><ul><li>Serendipitous browsing capabilities </li></ul><ul><li>Inexpensive way to create order and community </li></ul><ul><li>Examples </li></ul><ul><li>www.Flickr.com </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Photo sharing and management site </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Narrow </li></ul></ul><ul><li>www.Del.icio.us </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social bookmarks manager </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Broad </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limitations </li></ul><ul><li>No synonym control </li></ul><ul><li>No hierarchal structure </li></ul><ul><li>Do not consider the future </li></ul><ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><li>supplements traditional cataloging by increasing access points, findability </li></ul><ul><li>encourages discovery/rediscovery and sharing of information </li></ul><ul><li>Cons: </li></ul><ul><li>no controlled vocabulary, synonym/homonym control; lack of hierarchy </li></ul><ul><li>tags may be imprecise, ambiguous, inconsistent, or overly personal </li></ul>Goals: introduce controlled vocabulary to tagging systems; tools should be simple, efficient and not require large investments of capital; they should make it easier to locate new and older materials and allow reuse/remix of content and data to produce new collections and online tools