Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Where are we in decarbonizing industrial logistics?

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 11 Anzeige

Where are we in decarbonizing industrial logistics?

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Preliminary results from a survey among practitioners. Presented at the Greening of Industry Network conference July 2022 in Valenciennes, France. Authors: Philipp Miklautsch, Manuel Woschank

Preliminary results from a survey among practitioners. Presented at the Greening of Industry Network conference July 2022 in Valenciennes, France. Authors: Philipp Miklautsch, Manuel Woschank

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Where are we in decarbonizing industrial logistics? (20)

Aktuellste (20)

Anzeige

Where are we in decarbonizing industrial logistics?

  1. 1. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics WHERE RESEARCH BECOMES FUTURE Where are we in decarbonizing industrial logistics? Preliminary results from a survey among practitioners Philipp Miklautsch Manuel Woschank Chair of Industrial Logistics The research has received funding from the Office of the Styrian Provincial Government, grant agreement No. ABT08-247910/2021.
  2. 2. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics IPCC (2014), OECD/ITF (2015), Ritchie & Roser (2020), WBCSD & WRI 2 • Scope 1 “direct GHG emissions occur from sources that are owned or controlled by the company” • Scope 2 “accounts for GHG emissions from the generation of purchased electricity consumed by the company” • Scope 3 “a consequence of the activities of the company, but occur from sources not owned or controlled by the company” − Major component: Up- and Downstream Transportation and Distribution − About 30% of transport emissions are accounted to freight transport Scope 1 Producer Scope 2 Consumer P. Miklautsch, 2022 Scope 3 Consumer Electricity and Heat Production 25 % Industry 21 % Transport 14 % Industry 11 % Freight 4.2 % GHG Emissions from Industrial Logistics
  3. 3. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics The Need to Survey 3 investigates enablers and barriers • External pressure through stakeholders • Future business models • Costs and awareness investigates the implementation of measures • In Swedish LSPs and freight owners, 2016 • In operations management of Brazilian companies, 2020 Pålsson & Johansson (2016), Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al. (2020) Sarkis et al (2011), White et al (2014), Quintás et al (2018), Anderhofstadt & Spinler (2019), Seisini et al (2020), Miklautsch & Woschank (2022) Research exists, that … Contribution of this research • Describe − status quo of measures‘ implementation in Austrian companies − practitioners‘ perception of measures savings potential and barriers in Austria − anchoring of GL among Austrian shippers • Investigate influence of − industry sector (𝐻0) − company size (𝐻1) − anchoring of GL in companies (𝐻2) − perceived potentials (𝐻3) − perceived barriers (𝐻4) on measures‘ implementation P. Miklautsch, 2022
  4. 4. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Survey Structure 4 General questions (10) Respondent • Position • Experience Anchoring of Green Logistics • Emission reporting (yes/no/part.) • Goals for logisitcs (yes/no) • Operational anchoring (yes/no) • Budget for measures (yes/no) Organization • Sector (NACE) • Size (Employees & Revenue) P. Miklautsch, 2022 Questions related to greening measures (3 × 11) 11 measures to • Avoid (5) • Shift (2) • Improve (4) Questions about perceived • Emission savings potential (very low – very high) • Implementation barriers (very low – very high) • Level of implementation (not pursued - established) 𝑛 = 27 responses 𝑛 = 19 responses
  5. 5. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Respondents Preliminary Survey Results (I) 5 P. Miklautsch, 2022 General questions 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Position Experience Management Planning Other 1-2 yrs 2-5 yrs >5 yrs Organizations Goals Reporting Orga. Anchoring Budget Yes 5 6 9 3 No 22 18 18 24 Partially 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Anchoring of Green Logistics 𝑛 = 27 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Employees Revenue <10 50-249 250-999 >1000 <2 m€ 2-10 m€ 11-50 m€ >50 m€
  6. 6. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Preliminary Survey Results (II) 6 P. Miklautsch, 2022 Questions related to greening measures Interactive Plot https://www.miklautsch.eu/umfrage?lang=en Measures with highest potentials • Vehicles with alternative powerdrives • Fleet renewal Measures with highest barriers • Shift to rail • Vehicles with alternative powerdrives Measures with highest implementaion • Fleet renewal • Energy-saving driving stlye Overall level of implementation 1 2 3 4 5 ҧ 𝑖 = 2,76
  7. 7. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Preliminary Survey Results (𝐻2) 7 P. Miklautsch, 2022 Scale 1: Anchoring 𝑎 • Goals 𝑎1 • Reporting 𝑎2 • Orga. Anchoring 𝑎3 • Budget 𝑎4 ത 𝑎 = 2,26 𝐶𝐵𝐴 = 0,885 Scale 2: Implementation 𝑖 • Implementation of measure 1 𝑖1 • Implementation of measure 2 𝑖2 • … • Implementation of measure 11 𝑖11 ҧ 𝑖 = 2,76 𝐶𝐵𝐴 = 0,889 ത 𝑎 ҧ 𝑖 ത 𝑎 Pearson Correlation 1 ,610** Sig. (2-tailed) ,006 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 𝐻2: There is a significant relationship between the anchoring of GL in the organization and the level of implementation of GL measures.
  8. 8. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Preliminary Survey Results 8 Hyp. Difference/relationship Pearson Correlation ANOVA 𝐻0 significant difference in the level of implementation between different industry sectors (NACE sector level) No significant difference (𝑠𝑖𝑔 = 0,380) 𝐻0′ significant difference in the level of implementation between different industry sectors (NACE group level) No significant difference (𝑠𝑖𝑔 = 0,501) 𝐻1 significant relationship between company size and level of implementation No significant relationship (𝑠𝑖𝑔 = 0,208) 𝐻1′ significant difference in the level of implementation between companies with different sizes No significant difference (𝑠𝑖𝑔 = 0,457) 𝐻2 significant relationship between anchoring and level of implementation Significant relationship (𝑠𝑖𝑔 = 0,006) 𝐻3 significant relationship between perceived potential of a measure and its implementation Significant relationship for 2/11 measures 𝐻4 significant relationship between perceived barrier of a measure and its implementation Significant relationship for 1/11 measures P. Miklautsch, 2022
  9. 9. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Conclusion 9 • test whether the perceived GHG saving potentials match scientifically validated potentials • develop strategies to lower (perceived) barriers of high-potential measures • include other countries to compare effectiveness of policies and/or infrastructure Further research is needed to P. Miklautsch, 2022 Current implementation of measures and anchoring of GL is quite low in Austria Internal/external factors driving anchoring (e.g., reporting) will foster GL implementation (𝐻2) Raising awareness and disseminating case studies/pilots can accelerate implementation of alternatively powered vehicles (𝐻3 and 𝐻4) Industry sector and company size have not been found to influence measures’ implementation significantly (𝐻0 and 𝐻1) • Low number of responses • Compare shippers to carriers
  10. 10. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics Q & A 10 P. Miklautsch, 2022
  11. 11. Montanuniversität Leoben Chair of Industrial Logistics The authors 11 P. Miklautsch, 2022 Chair of Industrial Logistics Department Economic and Business Management, Montanuniversität Leoben Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Helmut Zsifkovits logistik@unileoben.ac.at +43 3842 402 2021 DI Philipp Miklautsch University Assistant & PhD candidate philipp.miklautsch@unileoben.ac.at /in/philipp-miklautsch/ 0000-0001-7004-1236 PD Dr. Manuel Woschank Deputy head & senior researcher manuel.woschank@unileoben.ac.at /in/manuel-woschank-a510ab38/ 0000-0003-1496-3388

×