3. THE MISSION – 5 key
elements
1. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE FIRM i.e. what
business are we in or should we be in
2. FROM CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
3. MUST REFLECT FIRMS VALUES & BELIEFS
4. INCLUDE SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE PRINCIPLE e.g. we aim to be the
leader in our field
5. MAIN REASONS FOR CHOICE OF APPROACH
e.g. Volvo stress the team approach – “We must treat
each other with trust and respect”
4. OBJECTIVES
COME FROM THE MISSION
THEY ARE SPECIFIC
WHAT IS TO BE DONE
WHEN IT IS TO BE DONE BY
QUANTIFIABLE
THEY FOCUS MANAGEMENT
ALLOW OUTCOMES TO BE
MEASURED
5. OBJECTIVES
1. FINANCIAL
e.g. earnings per share, ROR, margins
2. STRATEGIC (time scale/firm size
dependant)
e.g. diversification, merger, new markets,
internationalisation, larger market share,
higher product quality, lower unit cost, wider
product line
7. THE MANAGEMENT TEAM
CRUCIAL IN ENSURING BUSINESS
SUCCESS
FACILITATING CHANGE
FOCUSSING THE BUSINESS ON
OBJECTIVES
KEEPING THE BUSINESS COMPETITIVE
MOTIVATING RESOURCES
MUST BE COHESIVE & CREATE
8. MANAGEMENT TEAM
SIZE & MEMBERSHIP DEPENDS ON:
1.
TYPE OF BUSINESS
2.
SIZE OF BUSINESS
3.
PRODUCTS/SERVICES OFFERED
4.
LIFE CYCLE STAGE OF BUSINESS
5.
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE
BUSINESS
9. THE RELEVANCE OF
CULTURE & STYLE
KEY IMPACT ON MANAGEMENT TEAM
MT MAJOR IMPACT ON CULTURE & STYLE
10. THE RELEVANCE OF
CULTURE & STYLE
KEY IMPACT ON MANAGEMENT TEAM
MT MAJOR IMPACT ON CULTURE & STYLE
CULTURE
• Set of beliefs, values and
learned ways of managing
• Comes from firms past,
present, people, technology,
physical resources, objectives
and values
• Power, Role, Task, Personal
11. THE RELEVANCE OF
CULTURE & STYLE
KEY IMPACT ON MANAGEMENT TEAM
MT MAJOR IMPACT ON CULTURE & STYLE
CULTURE
• Set of beliefs, values and
learned ways of managing
• Comes from firms past,
present, people, technology,
physical resources, objectives
and values
• Power, Role, Task, Personal
STYL
E
• Process of influencing people
• So they will strive to achieve
firms mission – enthusiastically,
willingly
•Trait, Style, Contingency
12. THE RELEVANCE OF
STRUCTURE – its purpose
TO ALLOCATE WORK &
ADMINISTRATION TO
SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS
TO DISTRIBUTE POWER
TO CONTROL THE
OPERATION OF THE
BUSINESS
14. PEOPLE - WHY KEY?
CAN BE MOTIVATED - financial and non
financial
SKILL IS A SCARCE RESOURCE
EXPENSIVE TO REPLACE – own wood/ buy
trees
MAJOR OVERHEAD
GENERATE ADDED VALUE
CAN MAKE/BREAK THE ORG
CAN BE USED TO ENGINEER CHANGE
15. STRUCTURE & STRATEGY
WHAT IS STRATEGY - HOW ORG’s AIMS
AND OBJECTIVES ARE TO BE ACHIEVED S/T, M/T, L/T
WHAT COMES FIRST – STRUCTURE OR
STRATEGY?
TRADITIONALLY - STRUCTURE EVOLVES
& STRATEGY FOLLOWS
HOW - STRUCTURE EVOLVES AS ORG
GROWS AND PROCEEDS THROUGH ITS
16. STRUCTURE & STRATEGY
e.g. as org grows from sole trader to private co
and plc the structure becomes larger and
more bureaucratic - hence “structure evolves”
STRATEGY THEN TENDS TO FOLLOW
ARGUABLY - THEY TEND TO PROCEED IN
UNISON!
? BETTER THAT STRATEGY COMES FIRST
FOLLOWED BY STRUCTURE e.g. Sony uses
this practice.
17. STRUCTURE & STRATEGY
OR ARE THEY MORE CLOSELY
INTERRELATED i.e. structure needs to be
considered while strategy is being developed
IN THIS MODEL THEN THEY MAY BE
CLOSELY INTERDEPENDANT
MODERN, FLEXIBLE, PRO ACTIVE &
DYNAMIC ORG’s TEND TO FOLLOW THIS
FORM i.e. the structure influences the strategy
and vice versa. ORG’s THAT
18. RELEVANCE OF
RESOURCE AUDIT RESOURCES
LAND
RAW MATERIALS
LABOUR
CAPITAL
ENTREPRENEUR
INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE
19. THE RELEVANCE OF THE
RESOURCE AUDIT
RESOURCES – the means by which the
business generates value
VALUE IS THEN DISTRIBUTED TO
STAKEHOLDERS:
SHAREHOLDERS – higher divi’s, appreciating
share value
WORKERS – improved working conditions
and higher pay
CONSUMERS – lower prices, higher quality,
improved service
20. THE RELEVANCE OF THE
RESOURCE AUDIT
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS – suppliers, local
community, national community, global
community
REMEMBER - RESOURCES CAN ALSO
PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE (SCA) e.g. via highly skilled
staff
21. RESOURCE AUDIT – WHY?
TO IDENTIFY
THOSE RESOURCES THAT DELIVER SCA
& VALUE ADDED & THOSE THAT DON’T
UNDERUTILISED RESOURCES AND
THOSE THAT ARE NOT NEEDED
RESOURCE GAPS
SKILLS GAPS
OPPORTUNITIES FOR RATIONALISATION
& UNIT COST CUTTING
23. PAST PERFORMANCE
CAN REFER TO PERFORMANCE
FROM KEY STAKEHOLDER
PERSPECTIVE
i.e. shareholders, financiers,
consumers, workers
WIDER PERFORMANCE
i.e. local community/economy, national
and international community/economy
27. PERFORMANCE – key
stakeholders
NON FINANCIAL MEASURES
•MARKET SHARE
•EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
•PRODUCT PORTFOLIO•GROWTH
•QUALITY
•MERGERS/TAKEOVERS
•CUSTOMER SERVICE •BENCHMARKING
•PRODUCTIVITY
•OUTSOURCING
•R & D ACTIVITY
•RATIONALISATION
28. THE NEED FOR ANALYSIS
ASK QUESTIONS & PROVIDE ANSWERS
HAVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
CHANGED
HOW MUCH
WHY HAVE THEY CHANGED
HOW HAS THE BUSINESS BEEN
AFFECTED
WHO HAS BENEFITTED
WHO HAS SUFFERED