SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
EXCLUSIVE
Broken Planning: How Opponents Hijacked the Planning Process
Wednesday, March 18, 2015 by Patrick Fox
Government / Politics, United States
Former U.S. Speaker of the House Tip
O'Neill famously said that "All politics is
local." It can also be said that "All land use
is political." And the politics of land use
has turned against development. Rather
than generating a healthy debate on the
merits of a proposal and weeding out
projects lacking merit, good projects now
die every day in a political landscape
dominated by opponents to everything.
The U.S. planning system stated simply, is broken. A process built upon good intentions has been
undermined by advancing technology, public attitudes, and changing political dynamics. The planning
process no longer encourages the kind of development and community investment that once served as
an enviable engine for growth.
Vital projects, such as gas pipelines, electrical transmission lines, and power plants—as well as retail and
housing projects—that mean construction jobs, permanent jobs, tax base growth, and community
reinvestment are victims of a process that places the desires of the few over the needs of the
many. Vocal minorities have hijacked the system and rendered impossible a reasonable and rational
debate on development. The resulting impact of the current system on U.S. infrastructure, jobs, and the
vibrancy of American communities is virtually incalculable.
The politics of development have changed dramatically over the past 30 years. Politicians once fought for
new jobs, a growing tax base, and private investment in their communities—that was the yardstick upon
which they were judged when seeking reelection. Those days are gone.
Politicians today have come to understand that the path to power lies not, as it once did, in growth and
development but in obstruction. Constituents are not rising up to demand development, but they are filling
public hearings to stop it. A 2011 national survey found that 78 percent of Americans want nothing new
built in their communities. They are not against new development—just any new development near them,
and they are organizing to stop it.
Moreover, public cynicism over the relationship between elected officials and developers is dangerously
high. The same survey also found that 64 percent of Americans believe that the relationship between
elected officials and developers makes the development approvals process unfair.
Elected and appointed leaders act and react differently in front of a room full of angry constituents. Board
members who may see the community benefits of a project are unlikely to commit political suicide to
support it when confronted with passionate local opposition. Municipal leaders understand that
passionately motivated opponents, who fill hearing rooms, write letters, and circulate petitions to stop
new development, are a newly empowered breed of local activists. Not only will these angry constituents
remember the politicians who stood against them on Election Day, organized citizen activists often use
their new grassroots movements to mount a direct challenge by running for office themselves.
The key fact is this: Supporters of development do not participate in the political process, while today's
activist opponents show up and dominate the process. This is common knowledge to anyone involved in
development, not only in the United States but in virtually any democratic nation where citizens have a
say in what gets built.
Grassroots movements do not organically spring up to support a project, but opposition groups driven by
fear, self-interest and cynicism can take off like wildfire. The proliferation of digital tools like Facebook
and Twitter give average people the ability to find like-minded project opponents and to build effective
grassroots opposition movements. While project supporters certainly have access to these same tools,
they are far less motivated to use them. The process is overwhelmingly dominated by opponents.
Why should an elected official support a project and subject him or herself to the slings and arrows of
angry opponents? Standing with opponents and harnessing their passion and energy is the politically
expedient path. Standing with opponents and dramatically pounding your fists in opposition is the right
political posture for today's elected official seeking to build a political base and grab headlines.
Imagine a grocery store is proposed in your community that will redevelop a vacant retail site. The
developer is well known and respected and promises major site improvements and community amenities.
On a Tuesday night, a public hearing is held at Town Hall by the Planning Board or the City Council to
get public input prior to voting on the developer's application. Who shows up and makes their voices
heard? Not the supporters. While the vast majority of residents may fully support the project and welcome
it to their community, the hearing is packed with those who vigorously oppose it.
In some communities, a few letters to a town board member, a couple of phone calls, or a handful of
people at a hearing is a groundswell with the potential to significantly impact the process. In the end,
deciding what gets built is a political process dominated by opponents.
When supporters are not motivated to attend public hearings or to speak up, their position will remain
unrepresented. Increasingly, developers find themselves having to drum up supporters to provide a
counter balance and political cover for officials who want to support the project but cannot take the heat
from opponents. These efforts to provide "political cover" rely on getting unmotivated project supporters
to show their support in some demonstrable way to counter the room full of angry abutters.
Even union leaders, who used to be able to demonstrate support for projects, motivated by a desire for
good union jobs, lack the political clout they once enjoyed. They can no longer be counted on to drive
their members to turn out for a public hearing or even to get their members to vote for union endorsed
candidates.
Now imagine the daunting path for approval of a pipeline, electrical transmission line, or other linear land
use project that runs through multiple states and hundreds of communities.
All development is not good. There are bad projects, ill-conceived designs, and shoddy, fly-by-night
developers. Public input and vigorous debate are essential to ensuring that communities are developed in
a way that makes sense. Public participation is needed to expose short-sighted development and build on
a shared community vision. But that is not what our planning systems do any more.
The opponent-dominated development approval process will continue to inhibit U.S. growth until we take
action to ensure that smart development choices are not drowned out by fear and narrow self-
interest. The process must adapt to new technology, new political realities, and a new public mindset. As
we rush to placate the screaming few, we are stalling the very engine that has been at the heart of
American economic development.
The process must adapt to the new technological and political realities if we are to bring objective
decision making back to planning. Decision making bodies need to reach out beyond Not In My Back
Yard (NIMBY) activists and actively encourage input from the broader community. Some of the same
social networking tools utilized to build opposition movements could be used to generate community-wide
conversations on project benefits and community needs. Low cost electronic survey techniques can
collect feedback from the entire community and not just those sufficiently motivated by fear and self-
interest to sit through a municipal hearing. Techniques like Telephone Town Halls encourage participation
from the entire community, where they can ask questions, express concerns, and offer officials real
insights into community sentiment. Unfortunately, relying on social media tools like Facebook and Twitter
for broad discussions about community needs and priorities could give officials an insight into community
consensus. However, once the discussion turns to a specific project site, the discourse will be dominated
once again by opponents to that particular site.
Increased reliance on long-term community planning and visioning puts a focus on community needs and
encourages a rational conversation. If better utilized in the permitting process, this shared community
vision could help counter-balance NIMBY passion and help local officials see beyond the angry
constituent faces confronting them at every hearing.
John F. Kennedy’s quote, "One man can make a difference and every man should try," has never been
truer, but it's a lopsided fight. It will take a proactive, ongoing outreach effort to level the playing field and
ensure that all voices are being heard.
Patrick Fox is President of The Saint Consulting Group and specializes in the politics of land use. He has
managed or consulted on hundreds of land use projects across the United States, Canada and the United
Kingdom helping industry leading companies win approvals for land use projects. Patrick teaches
Building Community Support for Land Use Projects at the MIT Center for Real Estate and developed The
Saint Index, an international survey that quantifies and analyzes opposition to development. He has
addressed the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) Conference on Open-Air Centers, Eckert
Seamans' Panel on International Business, The Canadian Gaming Association, the AFL-CIO and ICSC
Centerbuild, among others, and served on the Urban Land Institute Advisory Panel for Springfield,
Massachusetts.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Best practices on social media communication for political figures and parties
Best practices  on social media communication for political figures and partiesBest practices  on social media communication for political figures and parties
Best practices on social media communication for political figures and partiesDino Amenduni
 
The role of social media in the UK General Election
The role of social media in the UK General ElectionThe role of social media in the UK General Election
The role of social media in the UK General ElectionLisa Harris
 
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the ElectionKyle J. Britt
 
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?James Dellinger
 
public-media-and-political-independence.pdf
public-media-and-political-independence.pdfpublic-media-and-political-independence.pdf
public-media-and-political-independence.pdfsampane6
 
Political journalismlecture2013
Political journalismlecture2013Political journalismlecture2013
Political journalismlecture2013POLIS LSE
 
Welcome to the Fifth Estate
Welcome to the Fifth EstateWelcome to the Fifth Estate
Welcome to the Fifth EstateGeoff Livingston
 
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on Facebook
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on FacebookIncreasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on Facebook
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on FacebookMIT GOV/LAB
 
How to Effectively Communicate With Voters
How to Effectively Communicate With VotersHow to Effectively Communicate With Voters
How to Effectively Communicate With VotersCraig Schoenfeld Iowa
 
Apple 8 Social Media and Political Action
Apple 8 Social Media and Political ActionApple 8 Social Media and Political Action
Apple 8 Social Media and Political Actionkesterbrewin
 
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...The Research Council of Norway, IKTPLUSS
 
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09Anne Canale Stalnecker
 
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General Election
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General ElectionPolitical journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General Election
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General ElectionPOLIS LSE
 
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16Christopher Merken
 

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Best practices on social media communication for political figures and parties
Best practices  on social media communication for political figures and partiesBest practices  on social media communication for political figures and parties
Best practices on social media communication for political figures and parties
 
The role of social media in the UK General Election
The role of social media in the UK General ElectionThe role of social media in the UK General Election
The role of social media in the UK General Election
 
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election
#SnapTheVote: How Digital Dominated the Election
 
Jiang_Min---Authoritarian Deliberation: Public Delieration in China
Jiang_Min---Authoritarian Deliberation: Public Delieration in ChinaJiang_Min---Authoritarian Deliberation: Public Delieration in China
Jiang_Min---Authoritarian Deliberation: Public Delieration in China
 
Making Sense of the Moment
Making Sense of the MomentMaking Sense of the Moment
Making Sense of the Moment
 
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?
 
public-media-and-political-independence.pdf
public-media-and-political-independence.pdfpublic-media-and-political-independence.pdf
public-media-and-political-independence.pdf
 
Political journalismlecture2013
Political journalismlecture2013Political journalismlecture2013
Political journalismlecture2013
 
Welcome to the Fifth Estate
Welcome to the Fifth EstateWelcome to the Fifth Estate
Welcome to the Fifth Estate
 
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on Facebook
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on FacebookIncreasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on Facebook
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on Facebook
 
How to Effectively Communicate With Voters
How to Effectively Communicate With VotersHow to Effectively Communicate With Voters
How to Effectively Communicate With Voters
 
Civic Engagement
Civic EngagementCivic Engagement
Civic Engagement
 
Apple 8 Social Media and Political Action
Apple 8 Social Media and Political ActionApple 8 Social Media and Political Action
Apple 8 Social Media and Political Action
 
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...
Young participation: Social Web for societal involvement, Petter Bae Brandtzæ...
 
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09
Johnson, B Speech To Suny Brockport Local Government Symposium, 5 19 09
 
Civic Engagement Through Social Media
Civic Engagement Through Social MediaCivic Engagement Through Social Media
Civic Engagement Through Social Media
 
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General Election
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General ElectionPolitical journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General Election
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General Election
 
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16
332675428-Odyssey-National-Issue-11-4-16
 

Ähnlich wie Broken Planning

Rhetoric And Its Impact On Politics
Rhetoric And Its Impact On PoliticsRhetoric And Its Impact On Politics
Rhetoric And Its Impact On PoliticsTina Mclellan
 
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem Solving
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem SolvingBeyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem Solving
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem SolvingEveryday Democracy
 
Sustaining Civic Engagement
Sustaining Civic EngagementSustaining Civic Engagement
Sustaining Civic EngagementCivic Works
 
Transforming Governance
Transforming GovernanceTransforming Governance
Transforming GovernanceNicole Cabral
 
Quote Approval In Interviews
Quote Approval In InterviewsQuote Approval In Interviews
Quote Approval In InterviewsSheri Elliott
 
Essay On Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential Election
Essay On  Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential ElectionEssay On  Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential Election
Essay On Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential ElectionPamela Caluso
 
Digitizing the Social Contract
Digitizing the Social ContractDigitizing the Social Contract
Digitizing the Social Contractsailorv
 
Essay On The Creation Of Public Policy
Essay On The Creation Of Public PolicyEssay On The Creation Of Public Policy
Essay On The Creation Of Public PolicyHeather Beninati
 
RESARCH ARTICLE.docx
RESARCH ARTICLE.docxRESARCH ARTICLE.docx
RESARCH ARTICLE.docxKankshiMalavi
 
Independent candidates can win elections 2014
Independent candidates can win elections 2014Independent candidates can win elections 2014
Independent candidates can win elections 2014Sardar Sanjay Matkar
 
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign AnalysisJulie Brown
 
Flexibility Is Key Essay
Flexibility Is Key EssayFlexibility Is Key Essay
Flexibility Is Key EssayTammy Moncrief
 

Ähnlich wie Broken Planning (20)

Terrorism 03
Terrorism 03Terrorism 03
Terrorism 03
 
People Power: Harnessing the Grassroots
People Power: Harnessing the GrassrootsPeople Power: Harnessing the Grassroots
People Power: Harnessing the Grassroots
 
Rhetoric And Its Impact On Politics
Rhetoric And Its Impact On PoliticsRhetoric And Its Impact On Politics
Rhetoric And Its Impact On Politics
 
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem Solving
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem SolvingBeyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem Solving
Beyond Civility: From Public Engagement to Problem Solving
 
Sustaining Civic Engagement
Sustaining Civic EngagementSustaining Civic Engagement
Sustaining Civic Engagement
 
Transforming Governance
Transforming GovernanceTransforming Governance
Transforming Governance
 
ISOCARP Democratic Urbanism
ISOCARP Democratic UrbanismISOCARP Democratic Urbanism
ISOCARP Democratic Urbanism
 
Quote Approval In Interviews
Quote Approval In InterviewsQuote Approval In Interviews
Quote Approval In Interviews
 
Essay On Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential Election
Essay On  Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential ElectionEssay On  Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential Election
Essay On Mass Media Coverage Of Presidential Election
 
Democratizing the RECAST City
Democratizing the RECAST CityDemocratizing the RECAST City
Democratizing the RECAST City
 
Nif money and politics report
Nif money and politics reportNif money and politics report
Nif money and politics report
 
Digitizing the Social Contract
Digitizing the Social ContractDigitizing the Social Contract
Digitizing the Social Contract
 
Essay On The Creation Of Public Policy
Essay On The Creation Of Public PolicyEssay On The Creation Of Public Policy
Essay On The Creation Of Public Policy
 
RESARCH ARTICLE.docx
RESARCH ARTICLE.docxRESARCH ARTICLE.docx
RESARCH ARTICLE.docx
 
Independent candidates can win elections 2014
Independent candidates can win elections 2014Independent candidates can win elections 2014
Independent candidates can win elections 2014
 
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis
4.4 Kinds Of Political Black Campaign Analysis
 
America speaks legacy_print
America speaks legacy_printAmerica speaks legacy_print
America speaks legacy_print
 
Future of Politics
Future of PoliticsFuture of Politics
Future of Politics
 
Hsci538 ppt
Hsci538 pptHsci538 ppt
Hsci538 ppt
 
Flexibility Is Key Essay
Flexibility Is Key EssayFlexibility Is Key Essay
Flexibility Is Key Essay
 

Broken Planning

  • 1. EXCLUSIVE Broken Planning: How Opponents Hijacked the Planning Process Wednesday, March 18, 2015 by Patrick Fox Government / Politics, United States Former U.S. Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill famously said that "All politics is local." It can also be said that "All land use is political." And the politics of land use has turned against development. Rather than generating a healthy debate on the merits of a proposal and weeding out projects lacking merit, good projects now die every day in a political landscape dominated by opponents to everything. The U.S. planning system stated simply, is broken. A process built upon good intentions has been undermined by advancing technology, public attitudes, and changing political dynamics. The planning process no longer encourages the kind of development and community investment that once served as an enviable engine for growth. Vital projects, such as gas pipelines, electrical transmission lines, and power plants—as well as retail and housing projects—that mean construction jobs, permanent jobs, tax base growth, and community reinvestment are victims of a process that places the desires of the few over the needs of the many. Vocal minorities have hijacked the system and rendered impossible a reasonable and rational debate on development. The resulting impact of the current system on U.S. infrastructure, jobs, and the vibrancy of American communities is virtually incalculable. The politics of development have changed dramatically over the past 30 years. Politicians once fought for new jobs, a growing tax base, and private investment in their communities—that was the yardstick upon which they were judged when seeking reelection. Those days are gone. Politicians today have come to understand that the path to power lies not, as it once did, in growth and development but in obstruction. Constituents are not rising up to demand development, but they are filling public hearings to stop it. A 2011 national survey found that 78 percent of Americans want nothing new built in their communities. They are not against new development—just any new development near them, and they are organizing to stop it.
  • 2. Moreover, public cynicism over the relationship between elected officials and developers is dangerously high. The same survey also found that 64 percent of Americans believe that the relationship between elected officials and developers makes the development approvals process unfair. Elected and appointed leaders act and react differently in front of a room full of angry constituents. Board members who may see the community benefits of a project are unlikely to commit political suicide to support it when confronted with passionate local opposition. Municipal leaders understand that passionately motivated opponents, who fill hearing rooms, write letters, and circulate petitions to stop new development, are a newly empowered breed of local activists. Not only will these angry constituents remember the politicians who stood against them on Election Day, organized citizen activists often use their new grassroots movements to mount a direct challenge by running for office themselves. The key fact is this: Supporters of development do not participate in the political process, while today's activist opponents show up and dominate the process. This is common knowledge to anyone involved in development, not only in the United States but in virtually any democratic nation where citizens have a say in what gets built. Grassroots movements do not organically spring up to support a project, but opposition groups driven by fear, self-interest and cynicism can take off like wildfire. The proliferation of digital tools like Facebook and Twitter give average people the ability to find like-minded project opponents and to build effective grassroots opposition movements. While project supporters certainly have access to these same tools, they are far less motivated to use them. The process is overwhelmingly dominated by opponents. Why should an elected official support a project and subject him or herself to the slings and arrows of angry opponents? Standing with opponents and harnessing their passion and energy is the politically expedient path. Standing with opponents and dramatically pounding your fists in opposition is the right political posture for today's elected official seeking to build a political base and grab headlines. Imagine a grocery store is proposed in your community that will redevelop a vacant retail site. The developer is well known and respected and promises major site improvements and community amenities. On a Tuesday night, a public hearing is held at Town Hall by the Planning Board or the City Council to get public input prior to voting on the developer's application. Who shows up and makes their voices heard? Not the supporters. While the vast majority of residents may fully support the project and welcome it to their community, the hearing is packed with those who vigorously oppose it.
  • 3. In some communities, a few letters to a town board member, a couple of phone calls, or a handful of people at a hearing is a groundswell with the potential to significantly impact the process. In the end, deciding what gets built is a political process dominated by opponents. When supporters are not motivated to attend public hearings or to speak up, their position will remain unrepresented. Increasingly, developers find themselves having to drum up supporters to provide a counter balance and political cover for officials who want to support the project but cannot take the heat from opponents. These efforts to provide "political cover" rely on getting unmotivated project supporters to show their support in some demonstrable way to counter the room full of angry abutters. Even union leaders, who used to be able to demonstrate support for projects, motivated by a desire for good union jobs, lack the political clout they once enjoyed. They can no longer be counted on to drive their members to turn out for a public hearing or even to get their members to vote for union endorsed candidates. Now imagine the daunting path for approval of a pipeline, electrical transmission line, or other linear land use project that runs through multiple states and hundreds of communities. All development is not good. There are bad projects, ill-conceived designs, and shoddy, fly-by-night developers. Public input and vigorous debate are essential to ensuring that communities are developed in a way that makes sense. Public participation is needed to expose short-sighted development and build on a shared community vision. But that is not what our planning systems do any more. The opponent-dominated development approval process will continue to inhibit U.S. growth until we take action to ensure that smart development choices are not drowned out by fear and narrow self- interest. The process must adapt to new technology, new political realities, and a new public mindset. As we rush to placate the screaming few, we are stalling the very engine that has been at the heart of American economic development. The process must adapt to the new technological and political realities if we are to bring objective decision making back to planning. Decision making bodies need to reach out beyond Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) activists and actively encourage input from the broader community. Some of the same social networking tools utilized to build opposition movements could be used to generate community-wide conversations on project benefits and community needs. Low cost electronic survey techniques can collect feedback from the entire community and not just those sufficiently motivated by fear and self- interest to sit through a municipal hearing. Techniques like Telephone Town Halls encourage participation from the entire community, where they can ask questions, express concerns, and offer officials real
  • 4. insights into community sentiment. Unfortunately, relying on social media tools like Facebook and Twitter for broad discussions about community needs and priorities could give officials an insight into community consensus. However, once the discussion turns to a specific project site, the discourse will be dominated once again by opponents to that particular site. Increased reliance on long-term community planning and visioning puts a focus on community needs and encourages a rational conversation. If better utilized in the permitting process, this shared community vision could help counter-balance NIMBY passion and help local officials see beyond the angry constituent faces confronting them at every hearing. John F. Kennedy’s quote, "One man can make a difference and every man should try," has never been truer, but it's a lopsided fight. It will take a proactive, ongoing outreach effort to level the playing field and ensure that all voices are being heard. Patrick Fox is President of The Saint Consulting Group and specializes in the politics of land use. He has managed or consulted on hundreds of land use projects across the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom helping industry leading companies win approvals for land use projects. Patrick teaches Building Community Support for Land Use Projects at the MIT Center for Real Estate and developed The Saint Index, an international survey that quantifies and analyzes opposition to development. He has addressed the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) Conference on Open-Air Centers, Eckert Seamans' Panel on International Business, The Canadian Gaming Association, the AFL-CIO and ICSC Centerbuild, among others, and served on the Urban Land Institute Advisory Panel for Springfield, Massachusetts.