SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability

The patient is independent, able to get around
and take care of himself, so not in the SEVERE
DISABILITY category. The patient is not
able to work, but this is not due to his
traumatic brain injury. He feels he could work
if it were not for the consequences of the leg
injury and the aneurysm. Therefore he should be
scored as a GOOD RECOVERY.
A. Upper Good:
   Return to normal life and NO current problems
   relating to the injury that affect daily life (dizziness,
   headache, and sensitivity to noise or light, slowness,
   memory failure, concentration problems)
Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability

B. Lower Good:
   Return to normal life BUT current
   problems relating to the injury that affect
   daily life (dizziness, headache, and
   sensitivity to noise or light, slowness,
   memory failure, concentration problems)
   Social activities: Resumed at least half as often as
   pre-injury
   Disruption or Strain: Occasional (less than once
   per week)
There are a number of symptoms that bother him, and
they could be related to the traumatic brain injury. This
would make him a Lower Good on the GOS-E.
Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability

Additional Considerations:
 This case illustrates the importance of
 separating out disability based on Traumatic
 Brain Injury from disability based on other
 trauma (e.g. multiple leg injuries) or another
 condition not related to the trauma at all (the
 aneurysm)
 Only if the inability to work, or to resume pre-injury
 activities is due to TBI should this lead to a lower GOS
 rating

More Related Content

Similar to Case 7 Discussion

Case 7: Discussion
Case 7: DiscussionCase 7: Discussion
Case 7: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 2 Discussion
Case 2 DiscussionCase 2 Discussion
Case 2 DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 2: Discussion
Case 2: DiscussionCase 2: Discussion
Case 2: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Neuromuscular and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular and TBI PrelearningNeuromuscular and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular and TBI Prelearningakhamil
 
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI PrelearningNeuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearningakhamil
 
Concussion in Sports
Concussion in SportsConcussion in Sports
Concussion in SportsSummit Health
 
NRA presentation
NRA presentationNRA presentation
NRA presentationGreg Meyer
 
Cerebral Palsy Presentation
Cerebral Palsy PresentationCerebral Palsy Presentation
Cerebral Palsy Presentationaverykeene
 
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14Human Exceptionality Chapter 14
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14Michelle Cottrell
 
Seizure: Status Epilepticus
Seizure: Status EpilepticusSeizure: Status Epilepticus
Seizure: Status EpilepticusJack Frost
 
Leininger physiatric approach to concussion
Leininger physiatric approach to concussionLeininger physiatric approach to concussion
Leininger physiatric approach to concussionworkcomp
 
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting Problem
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting ProblemConcussions: A Hard-Hitting Problem
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting ProblemZohar Shamash
 
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera project
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera projectNeurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera project
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera projectDaniela B
 
Overview Of Developmentally Disabled
Overview Of Developmentally DisabledOverview Of Developmentally Disabled
Overview Of Developmentally Disabled87amanda
 
How The Brain Recovers
How The Brain RecoversHow The Brain Recovers
How The Brain RecoversGreg Meyer
 

Similar to Case 7 Discussion (20)

Case 7: Discussion
Case 7: DiscussionCase 7: Discussion
Case 7: Discussion
 
Case 2 Discussion
Case 2 DiscussionCase 2 Discussion
Case 2 Discussion
 
Case 2: Discussion
Case 2: DiscussionCase 2: Discussion
Case 2: Discussion
 
Concussion for conn ota
Concussion for conn otaConcussion for conn ota
Concussion for conn ota
 
Neuromuscular and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular and TBI PrelearningNeuromuscular and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular and TBI Prelearning
 
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI PrelearningNeuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearning
Neuromuscular Diseases and TBI Prelearning
 
Concussion in Sports
Concussion in SportsConcussion in Sports
Concussion in Sports
 
NRA presentation
NRA presentationNRA presentation
NRA presentation
 
Cerebral Palsy Presentation
Cerebral Palsy PresentationCerebral Palsy Presentation
Cerebral Palsy Presentation
 
OT for TBI.pdf
OT for TBI.pdfOT for TBI.pdf
OT for TBI.pdf
 
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14Human Exceptionality Chapter 14
Human Exceptionality Chapter 14
 
Seizure: Status Epilepticus
Seizure: Status EpilepticusSeizure: Status Epilepticus
Seizure: Status Epilepticus
 
Cerebral palsy
Cerebral palsyCerebral palsy
Cerebral palsy
 
Leininger physiatric approach to concussion
Leininger physiatric approach to concussionLeininger physiatric approach to concussion
Leininger physiatric approach to concussion
 
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting Problem
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting ProblemConcussions: A Hard-Hitting Problem
Concussions: A Hard-Hitting Problem
 
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera project
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera projectNeurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera project
Neurobiological aspects of autism. Coursera project
 
Overview Of Developmentally Disabled
Overview Of Developmentally DisabledOverview Of Developmentally Disabled
Overview Of Developmentally Disabled
 
OT 537 ABI Part 3 2017
OT 537 ABI Part 3 2017OT 537 ABI Part 3 2017
OT 537 ABI Part 3 2017
 
How The Brain Recovers
How The Brain RecoversHow The Brain Recovers
How The Brain Recovers
 
C
CC
C
 

More from P4Strategy

GOS and GOS-E Case 8
GOS and GOS-E Case 8GOS and GOS-E Case 8
GOS and GOS-E Case 8P4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 5
GOS and GOS-E Case 5GOS and GOS-E Case 5
GOS and GOS-E Case 5P4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 4
GOS and GOS-E Case 4GOS and GOS-E Case 4
GOS and GOS-E Case 4P4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3P4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 2
GOS and GOS-E Case 2GOS and GOS-E Case 2
GOS and GOS-E Case 2P4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 1
GOS and GOS-E Case 1GOS and GOS-E Case 1
GOS and GOS-E Case 1P4Strategy
 
Case 9 Discussion
Case 9 DiscussionCase 9 Discussion
Case 9 DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 5 Discussion
Case 5 DiscussionCase 5 Discussion
Case 5 DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 4 Discussion
Case 4 DiscussionCase 4 Discussion
Case 4 DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 3 Discussion
Case 3 DiscussionCase 3 Discussion
Case 3 DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 3: Discussion
Case 3: DiscussionCase 3: Discussion
Case 3: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 4: Discussion
Case 4: DiscussionCase 4: Discussion
Case 4: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3P4Strategy
 
Case 8: Discussion
Case 8: DiscussionCase 8: Discussion
Case 8: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
Case 6: Discussion
Case 6: DiscussionCase 6: Discussion
Case 6: DiscussionP4Strategy
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 8
GOS/GOS-E Case 8GOS/GOS-E Case 8
GOS/GOS-E Case 8P4Strategy
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 7
GOS/GOS-E Case 7GOS/GOS-E Case 7
GOS/GOS-E Case 7P4Strategy
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 5
GOS/GOS-E Case 5GOS/GOS-E Case 5
GOS/GOS-E Case 5P4Strategy
 
Case 9: Discussion
Case 9: DiscussionCase 9: Discussion
Case 9: DiscussionP4Strategy
 

More from P4Strategy (19)

GOS and GOS-E Case 8
GOS and GOS-E Case 8GOS and GOS-E Case 8
GOS and GOS-E Case 8
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 5
GOS and GOS-E Case 5GOS and GOS-E Case 5
GOS and GOS-E Case 5
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 4
GOS and GOS-E Case 4GOS and GOS-E Case 4
GOS and GOS-E Case 4
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 2
GOS and GOS-E Case 2GOS and GOS-E Case 2
GOS and GOS-E Case 2
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 1
GOS and GOS-E Case 1GOS and GOS-E Case 1
GOS and GOS-E Case 1
 
Case 9 Discussion
Case 9 DiscussionCase 9 Discussion
Case 9 Discussion
 
Case 5 Discussion
Case 5 DiscussionCase 5 Discussion
Case 5 Discussion
 
Case 4 Discussion
Case 4 DiscussionCase 4 Discussion
Case 4 Discussion
 
Case 3 Discussion
Case 3 DiscussionCase 3 Discussion
Case 3 Discussion
 
Case 3: Discussion
Case 3: DiscussionCase 3: Discussion
Case 3: Discussion
 
Case 4: Discussion
Case 4: DiscussionCase 4: Discussion
Case 4: Discussion
 
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3GOS and GOS-E Case 3
GOS and GOS-E Case 3
 
Case 8: Discussion
Case 8: DiscussionCase 8: Discussion
Case 8: Discussion
 
Case 6: Discussion
Case 6: DiscussionCase 6: Discussion
Case 6: Discussion
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 8
GOS/GOS-E Case 8GOS/GOS-E Case 8
GOS/GOS-E Case 8
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 7
GOS/GOS-E Case 7GOS/GOS-E Case 7
GOS/GOS-E Case 7
 
GOS/GOS-E Case 5
GOS/GOS-E Case 5GOS/GOS-E Case 5
GOS/GOS-E Case 5
 
Case 9: Discussion
Case 9: DiscussionCase 9: Discussion
Case 9: Discussion
 

Case 7 Discussion

  • 1. Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability The patient is independent, able to get around and take care of himself, so not in the SEVERE DISABILITY category. The patient is not able to work, but this is not due to his traumatic brain injury. He feels he could work if it were not for the consequences of the leg injury and the aneurysm. Therefore he should be scored as a GOOD RECOVERY. A. Upper Good: Return to normal life and NO current problems relating to the injury that affect daily life (dizziness, headache, and sensitivity to noise or light, slowness, memory failure, concentration problems)
  • 2. Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability B. Lower Good: Return to normal life BUT current problems relating to the injury that affect daily life (dizziness, headache, and sensitivity to noise or light, slowness, memory failure, concentration problems) Social activities: Resumed at least half as often as pre-injury Disruption or Strain: Occasional (less than once per week) There are a number of symptoms that bother him, and they could be related to the traumatic brain injury. This would make him a Lower Good on the GOS-E.
  • 3. Case Study 7: Lower Good Disability Additional Considerations:  This case illustrates the importance of separating out disability based on Traumatic Brain Injury from disability based on other trauma (e.g. multiple leg injuries) or another condition not related to the trauma at all (the aneurysm)  Only if the inability to work, or to resume pre-injury activities is due to TBI should this lead to a lower GOS rating