The transition from early childhood education to primary school is a big step for all children, and a step which more and more children are having to take. Quality transitions should be well-prepared and child-centred, managed by trained staff collaborating with one another, and guided by an appropriate and aligned curriculum. Transitions like these enhance the likelihood that the positive impacts of early learning and care will last through primary school and beyond. While transition policies have been on the agenda of many countries over the past decade, little research has been done into how OECD countries design, implement, manage and monitor transitions. Filling these gaps is important for designing early years’ policies that are coherent, equitable and sustainable.
This report takes stock of and compares the situation across 30 OECD and partner countries, drawing on in-depth country reports and a questionnaire on transition policies and practices. It focuses on the organisation and governance of transitions; and the policies and strategies to ensure professional, pedagogical and developmental continuity between early childhood education and care settings and schools. The report describes the main policy challenges highlighted by participating countries, along with a wealth of practical strategies for tackling them. The publication concludes with six “cross-cutting” pointers to guide future policy development.
5. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59
Age groups
1960 1980 2014
Women in employment (%)
More women are in paid work during
childbearing years than in the past (2014)
6. Improving early education can help more
children get ahead and boost social mobility
The short and long term benefits of ECEC are
multidimensional
7. The brain sensitivity of highly important developmental
areas, such as emotional control, social skills, language
and numeracy, peak in the first three years of a child’s life
Sources: Adapted from Council for Early Childhood Development, (2010), in Naudeau S. et al. (2011).
8. Rates of return to one Euro invested in educational
interventions for disadvantaged and well-off children
at different stages of the life cycle (2006)
Source: Adapted from Cunha et al. (2006) in Wossmann (2008), Efficiency and equity of European education and training
policies.
9. Attendance at pre-primary school
by schools’ socio-economic profile
0
1
2
3
4
5
Sweden
Estonia
Russia
Latvia
Bulgaria
Iceland
Norway
Hungary
Denmark
Finland
Singapore
Israel
Belgium
HongKong(China)
Spain
SlovakRepublic
Uruguay
France
Macao(China)
Brazil
B-S-J-G(China)
Japan
Germany
CzechRepublic
Lithuania
Slovenia
Thailand
Austria
Croatia
Italy
ChineseTaipei
OECDaverage
Poland
Peru
Korea
Mexico
Luxembourg
Greece
Montenegro
DominicanRepublic
NewZealand
UnitedKingdom
UnitedStates
Switzerland
CostaRica
Qatar
UnitedArabEmirates
Colombia
Australia
Canada
Chile
Ireland
Tunisia
Portugal
Turkey
Years
Disadvantaged schools Advantaged schools
Number of years in pre-primary education among students attending socio-economically …
10. Children who attended early childhood education for
at least two years perform, on average, better than
others at age 15 (57 countries, PISA 2015)
The percentage of 15-year-old students who attended early childhood education
(ISCED 0) for less than two years are added into brackets next to the country's
name.
12. Denmark
Slovenia
Switzerland
Austria
Portugal
Netherlands
Luxembourg
Finland
Belgium
Russian Federation
France
Israel
Latvia
Germany
Poland
United Kingdom
United States
Estonia
Japan
New Zealand
Czech Republic
Ireland
Spain
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Italy
Chile
Greece
Mexico
R² = 0.4801
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Enrolmentratesofchildrenundertheageof3in
ISCED0andotherregisteredECECsettings
Maternal employment rates, with their youngest child under the age of 3
Relationship between mothers’ labour force participation and
enrolment rates in childcare is strong, especially for mothers
whose youngest child is under the age of 3 (2014)
14. Most governments have increased their investment
in recent years to expand enrolment and
open more day care centres and schools.
More needs to be done to improve
the working conditions of teachers
15. Universal access to at least one year of ECEC is now a reality in
most OECD countries (2014)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ireland
Australia
France
Mexico
Germany
Netherlands
Luxembourg
UnitedKingdom
Denmark
Belgium
Switzerland
NewZealand
Israel
Norway
Spain
Iceland
Italy
Portugal
Japan
Austria
Latvia
Hungary
Sweden
OECDaverage
Korea
Chile
Brazil
Poland
Greece
UnitedStates
Slovenia
Estonia
CzechRepublic
Russian…
SlovakRepublic
Finland
Turkey
%
Enrolment rates for children under the age 3 Enrolment rates at age 3
Enrolment rates at age 4 Enrolment rates at age 5
16. Incidence and length of early years participation
vary greatly (2014)
Latvia
IcelandPortugal
Slovenia DenmarkPoland
Norway
LuxembourgFrance
Germany
Hungary
Greece
Finland
Estonia
Sweden
BelgiumItaly
Ireland Spain
Austria
New ZealandSwitzerland
Netherlands
United Kingdom
15
20
25
30
35
40
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Averagehoursduringausualweek
Enrolment rates of children under the age of 3 in formal childcare (ISCED 0 and
other registered ECEC settings outside ISCED-2011)
17. In most countries, expenditure per child on ECEC
settings is higher for very young children (2013)
0
2 500
5 000
7 500
10 000
12 500
15 000
17 500
20 000
22 500
25 000
27 500
Luxembourg
Norway
Australia
Sweden
Iceland
Finland
NewZealand
UnitedStates
Germany
Austria
UnitedKingdom
Netherlands
Slovenia
OECDaverage
Belgium
France
Portugal
Ireland1
Chile
Japan
Italy
Korea
Spain
Poland
Switzerland1
Hungary
SlovakRepublic
Latvia
CzechRepublic
Israel
Turkey
Denmark
Lithuania
Brazil1
Mexico
Estonia
USD
Pre-primary (ISCED 02)
Early childhood development (ISCED 01)
All early childhood education and care (ISCED 0)
23. In many countries, the curriculum framework in pre-
primary education has been broadened
Proportion of countries and jurisdictions which declared in 2011 and 2015 that the
following content areas are included in their ECEC curriculum framework
24. High quality in ECEC primarily depends on
high quality interactions between staff and
children, which depends on workforce quality.
27. The benefits of ECEC can disappear unless
quality is sustained in primary education.
28. ECEC benefits can disappear if quality is not
sustained in primary education
Notes: Reference group: No pre-school and Very Low / Low Effectiveness
Source: Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., & Hunt, S. (2008). Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project
(EPPE 3-11): Influences on children’s attainment and progress in Key Stage 2: Cognitive outcomes in Year 6.
The Combined Impact of Pre-School Quality and Primary School
Effectiveness: Mathematics at the end of primary school (United Kingdom)
29. • Changes include:
– the types of activities they engage in,
– the ways in which adults interact with them,
– their physical surroundings,
– the number of peers,
– the rules and routines.
The transition from early childhood education to
primary school is a big step for most children.
30. • Disadvantaged children are more likely to struggle
during the transition
– they tend to attend lower-quality ECEC settings and schools
• Moreover, they are exposed to risk factors such as
– having low teacher expectations for their competence
– having poor parent-teacher interactions
– being exposed to a low-quality home learning environment
Transitions are particularly important for
disadvantaged children
32. • Policy documents are placing greater emphasis on the
need for smooth transitions, specifying the collaboration
between ECEC and primary school:
– In curriculum frameworks of both levels, such as in Austria,
Denmark, Finland, Japan, Norway, Slovenia and Wales (UK),
– or in education acts like in Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Sweden
• Responsibilities for ECEC are increasingly integrated
within the ministry of education, which facilitates
collaboration between education levels and can
strengthen coherence between ECEC and schools (e.g. in
New Zealand, Norway, Slovenia and Sweden).
Governance and organisation of transitions
are receiving greater attention
33. More than half the countries offer a separate
year or class/group the year before
compulsory primary school
56.1%
43.9%
Separate year/class in place
No separate year/class in place
Compulsory transition class:
11 jurisdictions (47.8%)
Canada (New Brunswick,
Nova Scotia, Prince Edward
Island), Chile, Colombia,
Croatia, Denmark, Finland,
Kazakhstan, Netherlands and
Poland
34. Compulsory school age is being lowered in some
countries to give children a stronger start at primary
school and to narrow socio-economic gaps.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Hungary
Mexico
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Chile
Colombia
Croatia
Greece
Netherlands
UnitedKingdom
Austria
Belgium(Flanders)
Canada¹
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Kazakhstan²
NewZealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
SlovakRepublic
Slovenia
Spain
Turkey
Sweden³
Age Pre-primary education Primary education
Notes:
1. Data refers to the most common compulsory school starting age across provinces and territories.
2. Children can start compulsory education at the age of 6 or 7 years.
3. There are plans to make the preschool class for 6-year olds compulsory.
The majority of children start both compulsory and primary education at the
age of six (2016)
Compulsory school starting age, by level of education
35. Most jurisdictions offer transition activities at the
centre level to prepare children and their parents
for their transit to school (2015)
21%
48%
68%
74%
75%
85%
93%
93%
Home visits by primary school teacher
Information materials for children
Exchange days
Support from specialists
Information materials for parents
Taster days
Parent information meetings
Open house days
Percentage of countries
Most jurisdictions offer transition practices to prepare children and their parents
for their transit to school (2016)
36. Curricula are becoming more aligned between
pre-primary and primary levels.
54 %
24%
22%
Aligned
Integrated
Not aligned or integrated Canada (Manitoba,
Northwest Territories,
Nunavut, Ontario and
Prince Edward Island),
Chile,
Colombia,
Germany (all 16 Länders)
Finland,
Japan,
Mexico,
New Zealand,
Portugal,
Slovenia,
Spain and Turkey
Canada( Alberta,
British Columbia,
New Brunswick and Quebec),
Italy,
Luxembourg,
Poland,
Sweden,
Switzerland and
UK (Wales)
Alignment between the last year of ECEC and primary school curriculum (2016)
37. Many jurisdictions have included new learning areas in
their pre-primary curricula to ensure a better transition
between pre-primary and primary education.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Literacy
Numeracy
Physical
education
Arts
Music
Science
Practical
skills
Healthand
wellbeing
Social
Sciences
Religion
Ethicsand
citizenship
ICT
Foreign
languages
Number of
jurisdictions
2011 2015
Content areas are increasing in pre-primary curriculum curricular frameworks
education (2011 and 2015)
38. Most pre-primary teachers in the OECD spend more
hours in direct contact with children than primary
teachers, with less time for preparation and meetings
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Chile1
Netherlands1
France2
Colombia
Spain
Scotland(UK)1
Israel2
Slovenia
CzechRepublic2
Germany2
OECDaverage
Portugal1
Belgium(Fr.)2
England(UK)3
Turkey2
Denmark2,3
Korea4
Poland3
Estonia1
Hungary4
Hours per year
Net contact time of teachers with children
Pre-primary Primary
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Other duties in pre-primary and primary education settings or schools other
than direct contact with children
39. Staff-parent collaboration is higher in
preschool than in primary school.
93%
59%
71%
39%
Staff collaborate with parents by sharing child
development records with aim to support
transitions
Staff collaborate with parents in other ways
on how to prepare transitions
Preschool Primary
Percentage of jurisdictions where staff collaborates with parents
40. Challenges still remain for making transitions
child-centred, guided by pedagogical
continuity, managed by trained staff, and
well-informed parental and community
engagement
41. Some challenges:
• Cross-level understanding of practices and
approaches is still limited in several countries
(e. g. in Germany, Japan or Slovenia)
• A tradition of disjoint pre-service training means
that boundaries are more difficult to overcome
(e.g. Austria, Germany or Japan)
• Local autonomy in curriculum implementation
challenges the coherence of the delivery of
pedagogical continuity (e.g. in Austria, Finland or
Wales (UK) )
Pedagogical continuity is critically important
when making transition child-centred
42. Good practices in transitions
• Shared views between ECEC settings and schools on
transitioning
• Alignment and balance between what and how children learn
in ECEC and primary school
• Shared understandings on how children learn differently
• Collaborative practices between preschool and primary school
teachers, such as sharing written information on child
development and children’s experiences
• Alignment of pedagogical understanding of preschool and
primary school teachers through training
• Alignment of working conditions of preschool and primary
school teachers
• Flexibility and responsiveness to individual communities,
families and children
• Collaboration among staff, managers, parents and the
community based on reciprocal communication, inclusivity,
mutual trust and respect.
43. Five lessons in transitions
• Focus on making schools ready for children, not
children ready for school
• Dispel some common myths and misconceptions
surrounding transitions
– Fragmentation and lack of coherence in goals, curriculum,
and pedagogical practices between the two sectors; and
lack of co-operation and collaboration among actors tend
to be rooted in differing perceptions, philosophies and
expectations of actors
• Overcome structural and informational roadblocks to
co-operation and continuity
• Encourage local leadership, backed by a clear national
policy framework
• Mainstream transition into existing equity measures
44. • Reviews: Austria, Denmark, Finland, Japan,
Norway, Slovenia, Sweden and Wales (United
Kingdom)
• Questionnaires: Austria, Flemish Community of
Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan,
Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
Wales (United Kingdom)
Participants
45. 45
45 Thank you
Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org
– All publications
– The complete micro-level database
Email: Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.org
Twitter: SchleicherOECD
and remember:
Without data, you are just another person with an opinion
Hinweis der Redaktion
The duration of pre-service education is also becoming more aligned. While this can help engender mutual understanding and respect between settings, budget constraints mean some governments may hesitate to raise qualification levels for ECEC teachers as higher wages will follow, raising the costs of ECEC services. Of the 16 countries where salaries are aligned, all but 3 also have the same duration of pre-service training at both levels. Only in two countries where training duration is aligned, Scotland (United Kingdom) and Iceland, do primary school teachers earn over 5% more than pre-primary teachers (OECD, 2015).