Background
Ireland’s health system is predominately tax funded,
but private health insurance contributes around 12
percent of funding (2013)
Private health insurance is voluntary and provides
mostly supplementary cover, with some elements of
complementary cover
Approximately 46 percent of people in Ireland are
currently covered by private health insurance
Market operates on the basis of community rating,
open enrolment and lifetime cover
Background – Contd.
There are significant overlaps between public and
private funding and delivery of healthcare in Ireland
Privately insured patients can be treated in private
hospitals or public hospitals
In many cases, consultants treat a mixture of public
and private patients
Public hospitals and consultants who treat both public
and private patients are paid differently for different
patients
Leads to an incentive to treat more private patients
State Subsidisation
The State subsidises private health insurance in a
number of ways, including:
Tax relief on premiums (almost €448m in 2012)
Not charging insurers full economic cost for public
hospital accommodation of private patients
Up to 2013, up to 20 percent of beds in public hospitals
could be designated as private beds
Insurers were charged for private patients
accommodated in private beds, but not for private
patients occupying public beds (apart from statutory
nightly charge – currently €75)
Tax Relief in Context
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
No.claimingrelief(000s)
Costoftaxrelief€m
Medical Insurance Health Expenses MI Claimants HE Claimants
Source: Revenue Commissioners
Unwinding the Subsidies
Budget 2014 (announced in October 2013) contained
two measures to reduce these subsidies
Amount of premium subject to tax relief was capped at
€1,000 for adults and €500 for children (under-18)
Applied immediately
Bed designation removed and insurers charged for
accommodation of private patients in all beds in
public hospitals
Applied from 1st January 2014
Bed Charges for Private Patients in
Public Hospitals (€)
Hospital Type Private
Room
Semi-private
Room*
Day Case Public/Non-
designated
Bed
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014
HSE Regional
Hospitals and
Voluntary and Joint
Board Teaching
Hospitals
1,046 1,000 933 813 753 407 75 813
HSE County
Hospitals and
Voluntary Non-
Teaching Hospitals
819 800 730 659 586 329 75 659
HSE District
Hospitals
260 222 193 75
* Figures for 2014 refer to accommodation provided in a multi-occupancy room. In practice, this could be
a semi-private room or a ward
Impact of the Changes
Changes came at a time when premiums were rising
substantially ahead of overall inflation and people
were leaving the market, particularly in the younger
age groups
Led to initial fears that these changes would
exacerbate the situation and further risk
destabilisation of the market
Lifetime community rating proposed (again) around
the same time as one measure to encourage take-up
among younger consumers & curb premium inflation
So What Actually Happened?
Premium inflation eased considerably
May be partly due to the introduction of lifetime community
rating from 1st May 2015
Insurers introduced new plans at lower end of price scale in
the run-up to this date to attract new customers
However inflation has begun to creep up again more
recently
May be partly due to unwinding of introductory offers on
entry-level plans in run-up to lifetime community rating
But is still relatively muted compared with inflation prior to
the introduction of the changes
So What Actually Happened?
Take-up stabilised, before increasing in immediate
run-up to introduction of lifetime community rating
May be a lagged response to employment growth
Lag longer than at peak – possibly due to reduced
affordability
Gradual increase in take-up since then
Rise of c. 4,000 members in Q4 2015 and Q1 2016 and
7,000 members in Q2 2016
Compares with average quarterly rise of c. 15,000
members between 2001 and 2008
Conclusions
Introduction of these measures has reduced State
subsidisation of private health insurance
Has therefore reduced an inequity in the system
However, a substantial subsidy remains
Despite initial fears, measures have not caused
significant damage to the market
Timing may have played a role in this, as employment
growth has returned and lifetime community rating
was introduced in May 2015, prompting innovation at
lower end of the market
Future Directions
Further reductions in State subsidy might well be
forthcoming
Would further reduce inequity
But needs to be balanced against risk of damaging PHI
market and overloading an already strained public
system
Possible measures
Further reduce (or eliminate) tax relief
Continue moves towards full economic costing of beds
in public hospitals
Set public hospitals aside for public patients only