C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx

C-VALUE,
C-VALUE PARADOX,
COT CURVE
PRESENTED BY:
MURUGAVENI B
I MSC BIOCHEMISTRY
GENOME:
• Genome is the some total of all genetic material
of an organism.
• Haploid set of genome present in the cell of an
organism.
• Human beings have 3 billion base pairs in their
haploid cells and 6 billion base pairs in their
diploid cells
• An organisms may have either DNA or RNA as
their genetic material.
C- VALUE:
• C-VALUE is the total amount of DNA present in the genome which is
expressed in terms of base pairs or picogram(bp or Mbp or pg)[106
bp= 1Mbp =10_3 pg DNA.
• Term coined by Hewson swift in 1950.
• Genome is chromosomes present within the haploid cell.
• Few examples of C-value;
• It was said that “ as complexity increases, the c-value ( amount of
DNA) increases from simpler to complex forms.”
• For e.g; human beings are the high complex organisms and
bacteria,viruses,mycoplasma,algae,fungi are lower organisms which
are simpler forms.
• This means that the amount of DNA increases from simpler to
complex forms.
• There is a linear relationship between genome size and organism
complexity.
WHAT IS THE C VALUE PARADOX?
• This term is given by C. A. Thomas in 1971, when repeated sequences
of DNA were discovered, explaining in every case no relationship
between genome size and complexity of organisms.
• The DNA content of an organism’s genome is related to the
morphological complexity of eukaryotes but it is observed that it is
different in higher eukaryotes.
• In higher eukaryotes there is no correlation between complexity and
genomic size; this is called the C value paradox. Genome size is the
total amount of DNA contained within the copy of a single genome.
• It is measured in terms of picograms and base pairs.
• Morphologically similar organisms appear to have different amounts
of DNA in their genome.
• Living organisms are classified into two categories: eukaryotes, which
are complex organisms with organized nuclei, and prokaryotes, which
are simpler organisms without organized nuclei.
• It was commonly believed that the complexity of an organism was
reflected in its DNA content, with eukaryotes having a higher
percentage of DNA than prokaryotes.
• However, recent findings have shown that this is not always the case,
and there are many exceptions to this rule. Therefore, it is incorrect
to assume that the amount of DNA in an organism is always
proportional to its complexity.
• In other words, we can say simpler the organism smaller the genome,
complex the organism larger the genome.
• The complexity of an organism can be predicted by knowing the size
of the genome and the size of the genome can be predicted by the
complexity of an organism.
• The eukaryotic genome consists of two parts, coding DNA and non
Coding DNA. Coding DNA is a protein synthesizing DNA and non-
coding DNA is present in multiple copies.
• The human genome consists of 2% of Coding DNA and 98% non
Coding DNA.
C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx
EXAMPLE;
• 1. Salamanders have 40 times more DNA in comparison to humans,
whereas humans are more complex organisms compared to
salamanders.
• 2. Housefly and Drosophila both are in the same group but the
housefly C value is higher than Drosophila.
REASON FOR C VALUE PARADOX;
• The reason for this is the presence of repetitive DNA, which means
the sequence of DNA which repeats in the genome many times.
C VALUE ENIGMA:
• C value enigma represents an updated term of the C value paradox, It
was given by Dr. T. Ryan Gregory in 2001.
• C value enigma relates to variation in the amount of non Coding DNA
found within the genomes of different eukaryotes.
• The variation of non-coding DNA varies from species to species.
• C Value enigma explains properly the reason for the C value paradox
and defines what types of non-coding DNA are found in the
eukaryotic genome and its function and what proportions they are
present.
COT CURVE ANALYSIS:
• It is a technique for measuring the complexity (size) of DNA or genome.
• The technique was developed by Roy Britten and Eric Davidson in 1960.
• The technique is based on the principle of DNA renaturation kinetics.
Principle: The rate of renaturation is directly proportional to the number of
times the sequences are present in the genome.
Given enough time all DNA that is denatured will reassociate or reanneal in
a given DNA sample.
The more the repetitive sequence the less will be the time taken for
renaturation.
PROCEDURE:
• The process involves denaturation of DNA
by heating and allowed to reanneal by
cooling.
• The renaturation of DNA is assessed
stereoscopically.
• Large DNA molecules take longer time to
reanneal.
WHAT IS COT VALUE?
• The renaturation depends on the following factors DNA concentration,
reassociation temperature, cation concentration and viscosity.
• Cot=DNA Concentration (moles/L) X renaturation time in seconds X buffer
factor (that accounts for the effects of cations on the speed of
renaturation).
• Cot:Co=Concentration of DNA and t= time taken for renaturation Low cot
value indicates more number of repetitive sequences
• High cot value indicates more number of unique sequences or less number
of repetitive sequences.
• For example: Bacteria- 99.7% Single Copy
• Mouse - 60% Single Copy +25% Middle Repetitive+ 10% Highly Repetitive
HOW TO CALCULATE COT VALUE?
• Cot=DNA Concentration (moles/L) X renaturation time in seconds X
buffer factor (that accounts for the effects of cations on the speed of
renaturation).
• Nucleotide concentration = 0.050 M
• Renaturation time = 344 sec
• Buffer factor, 0.5 M SPB = 5.820
• Cot value = 0.050X 344 X 5.820=100.000
C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx
APPLICATION OF COT CURVE ANALYSIS:
• Understanding genome size and
complexity.
• Understanding complexity of
sequences.
• Understanding relative proportion of
single copy and repetitive sequences.
REFERENCES:
• 1. 4th edition biochemistry Donald Voet &
Judith G. Voet.
• 2. Lehninger, 4th edition, Principal of
biochemistry, David L. Nelson & Michael.
THANK YOU…
1 von 18

Recomendados

Replicon von
RepliconReplicon
RepliconPraveen Garg
1.9K views27 Folien
RNA polymerase von
RNA polymeraseRNA polymerase
RNA polymeraseVîñàý Pãtêl
36.4K views11 Folien
Rna polymerase von
Rna polymeraseRna polymerase
Rna polymerasepriyanka raviraj
23.8K views22 Folien
C value paradox unit-ii von
C value paradox unit-iiC value paradox unit-ii
C value paradox unit-iiKamlakar More
9K views27 Folien
Gene expression concept and analysis von
Gene expression concept and analysisGene expression concept and analysis
Gene expression concept and analysisNoha Lotfy Ibrahim
7.3K views82 Folien
Cot curve von
Cot curve Cot curve
Cot curve EmaSushan
12.1K views2 Folien

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

Properties of dna von
Properties of dnaProperties of dna
Properties of dnafiresea
30.6K views21 Folien
Gene cloning strategies von
Gene cloning strategiesGene cloning strategies
Gene cloning strategiesneelotpal31
45K views16 Folien
Probe labelling von
Probe labellingProbe labelling
Probe labellingTapeshwar Yadav
36K views11 Folien
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexity von
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexityCot curve analysis for gene and genome complexity
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexityDr. GURPREET SINGH
1.9K views31 Folien
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genome von
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genomeRepetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genome
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genomeStevenson Thabah
35.8K views57 Folien
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mains von
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mainsHeterochromatin and euchromatin mains
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mainshithesh ck
31K views17 Folien

Was ist angesagt?(20)

Properties of dna von firesea
Properties of dnaProperties of dna
Properties of dna
firesea30.6K views
Gene cloning strategies von neelotpal31
Gene cloning strategiesGene cloning strategies
Gene cloning strategies
neelotpal3145K views
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexity von Dr. GURPREET SINGH
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexityCot curve analysis for gene and genome complexity
Cot curve analysis for gene and genome complexity
Dr. GURPREET SINGH1.9K views
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genome von Stevenson Thabah
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genomeRepetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genome
Repetitive sequences in the eukaryotic genome
Stevenson Thabah35.8K views
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mains von hithesh ck
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mainsHeterochromatin and euchromatin mains
Heterochromatin and euchromatin mains
hithesh ck31K views
Rflp presentation von Ashfaq Ahmad
Rflp presentationRflp presentation
Rflp presentation
Ashfaq Ahmad28.4K views
Trp operon von SKYFALL
Trp operonTrp operon
Trp operon
SKYFALL54.9K views
Degeneracy in genetic code von Sneha Mathew
Degeneracy in genetic codeDegeneracy in genetic code
Degeneracy in genetic code
Sneha Mathew5.7K views
T dna & transposone tagging 1 (2) von Arunima Sur
T dna & transposone tagging 1 (2)T dna & transposone tagging 1 (2)
T dna & transposone tagging 1 (2)
Arunima Sur20.7K views
Various model of DNA replication von EmaSushan
Various model of DNA replicationVarious model of DNA replication
Various model of DNA replication
EmaSushan10.4K views

Similar a C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx

Gene cloning von
Gene cloningGene cloning
Gene cloningpriya tamang
100.6K views40 Folien
Eukaryotic Genome Organization von
Eukaryotic Genome OrganizationEukaryotic Genome Organization
Eukaryotic Genome OrganizationNirajKumarpal
22 views20 Folien
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems von
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic SystemsDNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic SystemsBir Bahadur Thapa
13.4K views78 Folien
Prokaryote genome von
Prokaryote genomeProkaryote genome
Prokaryote genomemonanarayan
45.6K views22 Folien
Genome von
GenomeGenome
GenomeErin Davis
13.5K views25 Folien
Content of the genome von
Content of the genomeContent of the genome
Content of the genomeKiran Modi
634 views9 Folien

Similar a C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx(20)

Eukaryotic Genome Organization von NirajKumarpal
Eukaryotic Genome OrganizationEukaryotic Genome Organization
Eukaryotic Genome Organization
NirajKumarpal22 views
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems von Bir Bahadur Thapa
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic SystemsDNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems
DNA organization or Genetic makeup in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems
Bir Bahadur Thapa13.4K views
Prokaryote genome von monanarayan
Prokaryote genomeProkaryote genome
Prokaryote genome
monanarayan45.6K views
Content of the genome von Kiran Modi
Content of the genomeContent of the genome
Content of the genome
Kiran Modi634 views
Genome organization of prokaryotes and eukaryotes von SuganyaPaulraj
Genome organization of prokaryotes and eukaryotesGenome organization of prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Genome organization of prokaryotes and eukaryotes
SuganyaPaulraj7K views
Organization of mammalian genome von jagan vana
Organization of mammalian genomeOrganization of mammalian genome
Organization of mammalian genome
jagan vana7K views
nucleic acid sequencing methods(DNA finger printing,nucleic acid hybridizatio... von Shiva Kumar
nucleic acid sequencing methods(DNA finger printing,nucleic acid hybridizatio...nucleic acid sequencing methods(DNA finger printing,nucleic acid hybridizatio...
nucleic acid sequencing methods(DNA finger printing,nucleic acid hybridizatio...
Shiva Kumar366 views
Genome concept, types, and function von Praveen Garg
Genome  concept, types, and functionGenome  concept, types, and function
Genome concept, types, and function
Praveen Garg1.4K views
bacterial genetics.pptx von obedcudjoe1
bacterial genetics.pptxbacterial genetics.pptx
bacterial genetics.pptx
obedcudjoe110 views

Último

IMMUNODIAGNOSTICS KITS.pdf von
IMMUNODIAGNOSTICS KITS.pdfIMMUNODIAGNOSTICS KITS.pdf
IMMUNODIAGNOSTICS KITS.pdfvetrivel303632
17 views10 Folien
Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptx von
Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptxFactors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptx
Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptxSamarthGiri1
7 views11 Folien
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptx von
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptxExperimental animal Guinea pigs.pptx
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptxMansee Arya
40 views16 Folien
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o... von
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...MaherFouda1
7 views100 Folien
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio... von
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...Trustlife
146 views17 Folien
CYTOSKELETON STRUCTURE.ppt von
CYTOSKELETON STRUCTURE.pptCYTOSKELETON STRUCTURE.ppt
CYTOSKELETON STRUCTURE.pptEstherShobhaR
14 views19 Folien

Último(20)

Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptx von SamarthGiri1
Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptxFactors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptx
Factors affecting fluorescence and phosphorescence.pptx
SamarthGiri17 views
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptx von Mansee Arya
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptxExperimental animal Guinea pigs.pptx
Experimental animal Guinea pigs.pptx
Mansee Arya40 views
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o... von MaherFouda1
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...
selection of preformed arch wires during the alignment stage of preadjusted o...
MaherFouda17 views
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio... von Trustlife
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...
Discovery of therapeutic agents targeting PKLR for NAFLD using drug repositio...
Trustlife146 views
Applications of Large Language Models in Materials Discovery and Design von Anubhav Jain
Applications of Large Language Models in Materials Discovery and DesignApplications of Large Language Models in Materials Discovery and Design
Applications of Large Language Models in Materials Discovery and Design
Anubhav Jain14 views
Indian council for child welfare von RenuWaghmare2
Indian council for child welfareIndian council for child welfare
Indian council for child welfare
RenuWaghmare27 views
Study on Drug Drug Interaction Through Prescription Analysis of Type II Diabe... von Anmol Vishnu Gupta
Study on Drug Drug Interaction Through Prescription Analysis of Type II Diabe...Study on Drug Drug Interaction Through Prescription Analysis of Type II Diabe...
Study on Drug Drug Interaction Through Prescription Analysis of Type II Diabe...
A Ready-to-Analyze High-Plex Spatial Signature Development Workflow for Cance... von InsideScientific
A Ready-to-Analyze High-Plex Spatial Signature Development Workflow for Cance...A Ready-to-Analyze High-Plex Spatial Signature Development Workflow for Cance...
A Ready-to-Analyze High-Plex Spatial Signature Development Workflow for Cance...
InsideScientific115 views
Note on the Riemann Hypothesis von vegafrank2
Note on the Riemann HypothesisNote on the Riemann Hypothesis
Note on the Riemann Hypothesis
vegafrank28 views
2. Natural Sciences and Technology Author Siyavula.pdf von ssuser821efa
2. Natural Sciences and Technology Author Siyavula.pdf2. Natural Sciences and Technology Author Siyavula.pdf
2. Natural Sciences and Technology Author Siyavula.pdf
ssuser821efa11 views

C VALUE, C VALUE PARADOX , COT CURVE ANALYSIS.pptx

  • 1. C-VALUE, C-VALUE PARADOX, COT CURVE PRESENTED BY: MURUGAVENI B I MSC BIOCHEMISTRY
  • 2. GENOME: • Genome is the some total of all genetic material of an organism. • Haploid set of genome present in the cell of an organism. • Human beings have 3 billion base pairs in their haploid cells and 6 billion base pairs in their diploid cells • An organisms may have either DNA or RNA as their genetic material.
  • 3. C- VALUE: • C-VALUE is the total amount of DNA present in the genome which is expressed in terms of base pairs or picogram(bp or Mbp or pg)[106 bp= 1Mbp =10_3 pg DNA. • Term coined by Hewson swift in 1950. • Genome is chromosomes present within the haploid cell. • Few examples of C-value;
  • 4. • It was said that “ as complexity increases, the c-value ( amount of DNA) increases from simpler to complex forms.” • For e.g; human beings are the high complex organisms and bacteria,viruses,mycoplasma,algae,fungi are lower organisms which are simpler forms. • This means that the amount of DNA increases from simpler to complex forms. • There is a linear relationship between genome size and organism complexity.
  • 5. WHAT IS THE C VALUE PARADOX? • This term is given by C. A. Thomas in 1971, when repeated sequences of DNA were discovered, explaining in every case no relationship between genome size and complexity of organisms. • The DNA content of an organism’s genome is related to the morphological complexity of eukaryotes but it is observed that it is different in higher eukaryotes. • In higher eukaryotes there is no correlation between complexity and genomic size; this is called the C value paradox. Genome size is the total amount of DNA contained within the copy of a single genome. • It is measured in terms of picograms and base pairs.
  • 6. • Morphologically similar organisms appear to have different amounts of DNA in their genome. • Living organisms are classified into two categories: eukaryotes, which are complex organisms with organized nuclei, and prokaryotes, which are simpler organisms without organized nuclei. • It was commonly believed that the complexity of an organism was reflected in its DNA content, with eukaryotes having a higher percentage of DNA than prokaryotes. • However, recent findings have shown that this is not always the case, and there are many exceptions to this rule. Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that the amount of DNA in an organism is always proportional to its complexity.
  • 7. • In other words, we can say simpler the organism smaller the genome, complex the organism larger the genome. • The complexity of an organism can be predicted by knowing the size of the genome and the size of the genome can be predicted by the complexity of an organism. • The eukaryotic genome consists of two parts, coding DNA and non Coding DNA. Coding DNA is a protein synthesizing DNA and non- coding DNA is present in multiple copies. • The human genome consists of 2% of Coding DNA and 98% non Coding DNA.
  • 9. EXAMPLE; • 1. Salamanders have 40 times more DNA in comparison to humans, whereas humans are more complex organisms compared to salamanders. • 2. Housefly and Drosophila both are in the same group but the housefly C value is higher than Drosophila. REASON FOR C VALUE PARADOX; • The reason for this is the presence of repetitive DNA, which means the sequence of DNA which repeats in the genome many times.
  • 10. C VALUE ENIGMA: • C value enigma represents an updated term of the C value paradox, It was given by Dr. T. Ryan Gregory in 2001. • C value enigma relates to variation in the amount of non Coding DNA found within the genomes of different eukaryotes. • The variation of non-coding DNA varies from species to species. • C Value enigma explains properly the reason for the C value paradox and defines what types of non-coding DNA are found in the eukaryotic genome and its function and what proportions they are present.
  • 11. COT CURVE ANALYSIS: • It is a technique for measuring the complexity (size) of DNA or genome. • The technique was developed by Roy Britten and Eric Davidson in 1960. • The technique is based on the principle of DNA renaturation kinetics. Principle: The rate of renaturation is directly proportional to the number of times the sequences are present in the genome. Given enough time all DNA that is denatured will reassociate or reanneal in a given DNA sample. The more the repetitive sequence the less will be the time taken for renaturation.
  • 12. PROCEDURE: • The process involves denaturation of DNA by heating and allowed to reanneal by cooling. • The renaturation of DNA is assessed stereoscopically. • Large DNA molecules take longer time to reanneal.
  • 13. WHAT IS COT VALUE? • The renaturation depends on the following factors DNA concentration, reassociation temperature, cation concentration and viscosity. • Cot=DNA Concentration (moles/L) X renaturation time in seconds X buffer factor (that accounts for the effects of cations on the speed of renaturation). • Cot:Co=Concentration of DNA and t= time taken for renaturation Low cot value indicates more number of repetitive sequences • High cot value indicates more number of unique sequences or less number of repetitive sequences. • For example: Bacteria- 99.7% Single Copy • Mouse - 60% Single Copy +25% Middle Repetitive+ 10% Highly Repetitive
  • 14. HOW TO CALCULATE COT VALUE? • Cot=DNA Concentration (moles/L) X renaturation time in seconds X buffer factor (that accounts for the effects of cations on the speed of renaturation). • Nucleotide concentration = 0.050 M • Renaturation time = 344 sec • Buffer factor, 0.5 M SPB = 5.820 • Cot value = 0.050X 344 X 5.820=100.000
  • 16. APPLICATION OF COT CURVE ANALYSIS: • Understanding genome size and complexity. • Understanding complexity of sequences. • Understanding relative proportion of single copy and repetitive sequences.
  • 17. REFERENCES: • 1. 4th edition biochemistry Donald Voet & Judith G. Voet. • 2. Lehninger, 4th edition, Principal of biochemistry, David L. Nelson & Michael.