Primary etiologic sites:
1- Neuromuscular system:
The muscle group that serve most frequently as primary etiologic sites are:
== muscles of mastication
== muscles of facial expression
== tongue
The neuromuscular system plays its primary role in the etiology of dentofacial deformity by the effect of abnormal contraction of bony skeleton and the dentition. Both bones and teeth are affected by the many functional activities of orofacial region
2- Bone:
Since the bone pf maxilla and mandible serve as bases of dental arches, changes in dental arches growth may alter the occlusal and functional relationship.
3- Teeth;
The teeth may be primary sites in the etiology of dentofacial deformity in many ways
Gross variation in size and shape are encountered frequently and always are of concern
Decrease or increase in the regular number of teeth will give rise malocclusion
Etiologic factors:
A- Extrinsic factors:
1- Evolution:
With evolution, the jaws become smaller, reduction in number and size of teeth and diminution of jaw projections together with increased in vertical height of the face and there is a retrognathic tendency in mans as he ascends the evolutionary scale
2- Heredity:
Transmission of dentofacial characteristics through generations by genes. Most authors between 1900-- 1920 did not completely determine the role of inheritance in determination of the form, size and proportion of dentofacial skeleton, but they stress their work upon the effect of the environmental factors, and at this time they were hardly belief that the effect of local lack of function is more important.
Bennet statement: the size, form and density of bones such as maxilla and mandible varies according to the extent to which these structure are used during period of growth – (function stimulate growth)
Walk Joff statement: the form and degree of development of maxilla and mandible depends upon the magnitude of functional stimuli of muscles acting upon these structures.
Baker: his study was performed on animals by unilateral amputation of muscles of mastication, he found lack of growth on the affected side.
Brash: studied the facial form and the dental development in twins on genetic bases, he also emphasized the genetic facial pattern of some royal families in Europe where they had been inter-marriage, his studies gave the best evidence to support the role of inheritance
Axel Lundstorm:1925 showed that, the form and size of dental bases and the teeth are genetically determined, when the size of the teeth and their basal arches are not correlated, problems of crowding or spacing will be arising.
Broadbent and Hofrath 1931: developed standardized cephalometric x-ray technique which permit serial longitudinal studies of facial growth, by this studies the concept of inheritance growth pattern arises
There are three types of transmission of malocclusion from the standpoint of genetics:
a- Repetitive: the recurrence of single dentofacial deviation within the immediate famil