SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Suche senden
Hochladen
Einloggen
Registrieren
AEN179 (1).pdf
Melden
Mohamedshabana38
Folgen
28. May 2023
•
0 gefällt mir
•
3 views
AEN179 (1).pdf
28. May 2023
•
0 gefällt mir
•
3 views
Mohamedshabana38
Folgen
Melden
Ingenieurwesen
CORNING
AEN179 (1).pdf
1 von 5
Jetzt herunterladen
1
von
5
Recomendados
cable railing
Dan Cary
272 views
•
5 Folien
Designing a cable_tray
Tarek Aboukhadra
545 views
•
20 Folien
Differential pair routing_pcb-oct2011
Muhammad Saad
547 views
•
4 Folien
Qfn assembly reliability
Bob Wettermann
67 views
•
8 Folien
QFN assembly reliability
Bob Wettermann
175 views
•
8 Folien
Qfn assembly reliability
Bob Wettermann
143 views
•
8 Folien
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a AEN179 (1).pdf
How To Cut Downtime & Extend Cable Life - Surface Mining Cable Care & Mainten...
Thorne & Derrick International
990 views
•
16 Folien
Innovative Cable Sealing System
DEEPAK BALONI
71 views
•
4 Folien
Installation, testing and jointing of lt and ht power cables up to 33 kv
Alexander Decker
1.1K views
•
7 Folien
Technical Aspects of EHV XLPE Cable End Termination and on Site Brief Procedure
paperpublications3
41 views
•
4 Folien
Design of Three Phase 11000/433 V And 100 KVA Transformer
Sanjoy Biswas
4.4K views
•
20 Folien
.3mm CSP and LFCSP Reliability
Greg Caswell
1.6K views
•
29 Folien
Similar a AEN179 (1).pdf
(20)
How To Cut Downtime & Extend Cable Life - Surface Mining Cable Care & Mainten...
Thorne & Derrick International
•
990 views
Innovative Cable Sealing System
DEEPAK BALONI
•
71 views
Installation, testing and jointing of lt and ht power cables up to 33 kv
Alexander Decker
•
1.1K views
Technical Aspects of EHV XLPE Cable End Termination and on Site Brief Procedure
paperpublications3
•
41 views
Design of Three Phase 11000/433 V And 100 KVA Transformer
Sanjoy Biswas
•
4.4K views
.3mm CSP and LFCSP Reliability
Greg Caswell
•
1.6K views
Liquid level specification
IPEC
•
1.2K views
Development robust 03015_process_ipc
Robert Gray
•
80 views
Esab world pipelines
Jorg Eichhorn
•
655 views
SLS Design Guide for Quickparts 3D printing services (EN)
Quoc Tuan Duong, ing.
•
1.5K views
Screw and Barrel Inspection
R&B Plastics Machinery
•
8.3K views
Crabtree PVC trunking
Darren Garbett
•
710 views
MMM Module - 2.pptx
Somanath Swamy R H M
•
14 views
Choosing a stencil
Diego Biondo
•
688 views
Keep running costs down operating en-masse chain conveyors
Milling and Grain magazine
•
524 views
Cane V2
Vishwarath Taduru
•
84 views
Roxtec Cable Transit - Substation Cable Termination Design
Thorne & Derrick International
•
1K views
Tackling High Volume Production of 3DI
Hugo Pristauz
•
671 views
Scojet Catalog 2013
scojetinc
•
844 views
Practical production uses_of_smt_adhesives
PSKing1
•
75 views
Más de Mohamedshabana38
1 Sampling and Signal Reconstruction.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
2 views
•
15 Folien
2 Aliasing (1).pdf
Mohamedshabana38
1 view
•
8 Folien
1.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
2 views
•
6 Folien
dsl-advances-0130938106-9780130938107.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
15 views
•
570 Folien
419907669-Linear-Algebra-by-Gilbert-Strang.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
5 views
•
516 Folien
Cable Engineering for Local Area Networks (Barry J. Elliott) (Z-Library).pdf
Mohamedshabana38
4 views
•
348 Folien
Más de Mohamedshabana38
(20)
1 Sampling and Signal Reconstruction.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
2 Aliasing (1).pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
1 view
1.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
dsl-advances-0130938106-9780130938107.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
15 views
419907669-Linear-Algebra-by-Gilbert-Strang.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
5 views
Cable Engineering for Local Area Networks (Barry J. Elliott) (Z-Library).pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
4 views
Module 1 (1).pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
exfo_spec-sheet_maxtester-635_v16_en.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
3 views
mod_2.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
3 views
454022781-ODN-Planning-and-Design-Suggestions-TLF.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
26 views
mod_3.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
383934148-DWDM-101-Introduction-to-DWDM-2-pdf.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
30 views
mod_4.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
Applications of Operational Amplifiers 3rd generation techniques (Jerald G. G...
Mohamedshabana38
•
7 views
408375669-XDSL.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
10 views
Exfo-CABLESHARK-P3-Specifications-11A67.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
2 views
BCH_Prime_ODF_EN.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
3 views
101483423-Fiber-Characterization-Training.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
14 views
424185963-Introduction-to-VoLTE.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
5 views
exfo_reference-guide_otn.pdf
Mohamedshabana38
•
11 views
Último
engagedeeplycha9-140407035838-phpapp02.pptx
karanthakur846894
6 views
•
23 Folien
gaurav singh 19ME25 (1).pptx
GauravSingh31583
11 views
•
30 Folien
PORTFOLIO-Pascual-Khristine-Lerie.pdf
KhristinePascual1
7 views
•
15 Folien
07_ Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2024.pdf
Educational Group Mohammad Farshadian
25 views
•
3 Folien
Collection and transport of Solid Waste-SWM.pptx
vinodnejkar1
13 views
•
13 Folien
Airbus A319 Aircraft Airport & Maintenance Planning Manual.pdf
TahirSadikovi
10 views
•
350 Folien
Último
(20)
engagedeeplycha9-140407035838-phpapp02.pptx
karanthakur846894
•
6 views
gaurav singh 19ME25 (1).pptx
GauravSingh31583
•
11 views
PORTFOLIO-Pascual-Khristine-Lerie.pdf
KhristinePascual1
•
7 views
07_ Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2024.pdf
Educational Group Mohammad Farshadian
•
25 views
Collection and transport of Solid Waste-SWM.pptx
vinodnejkar1
•
13 views
Airbus A319 Aircraft Airport & Maintenance Planning Manual.pdf
TahirSadikovi
•
10 views
Ansys Technology Day in Budapest, Agenda
SIMTEC Software and Services
•
92 views
Design HVAC System for Hospital
Mohammed Abdulhabeb Ahmed
•
11 views
Airbus A320 Aircraft Airport & Maintenance Planning Manual.pdf
TahirSadikovi
•
64 views
DBMS
KaranSingh274675
•
13 views
ComputerIntroduction.ppt
IlaiyarajaS2
•
6 views
Electrical Tools.pptx
jorross1
•
8 views
Data Communication & Computer Networks
Sreedhar Chowdam
•
25 views
SC 24でのメタバース関連標準化概要:ヘルスケア応用事例を交えて(ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24)
Kurata Takeshi
•
33 views
CCS334 BIG DATA ANALYTICS Session 3 Distributed models.pptx
Asst.Prof. M.Gokilavani
•
12 views
INDIAN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM PPT chp-1.pptx
RuchiSharma494176
•
12 views
Unit 4 Food packaging materials and testing.pptx
Dr P DINESHKUMAR
•
8 views
Instruction Set : Computer Architecture
Ritwik Mishra
•
7 views
Airbus A330 Flight Crew Operating Manual PDF.pdf
TahirSadikovi
•
17 views
Cessna Model 406 Pilot Operating Handbook.pdf
TahirSadikovi
•
8 views
AEN179 (1).pdf
1.
Corning Optical Communications 4200
Corning Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28216 800 743-2671 f 828 901-5533 www.corning.com/opcomm AEN179, Revision 0 - Page 1 of 5 © 2022 Corning Optical Communications. All rights reserved Published: 07/25/2022 Handhole Size Considerations AEN179, Revision 0 Civil costs are a major part of deploying a buried network. Determining the appropriate size handhole for the installation can reduce capital expenses. For example, a smaller handhole may fit into a green space better, reduce the need to cut or re-pour concrete, as well as added material and shipping costs and complexities of larger handholes. Therefore, it is prudent to assess the minimum handhole sizes for each deployment. Handhole Layout When determining how large the handhole needs to be to store the terminal, connectors, and cable slack, one of the first considerations is how the terminal will be installed. Having an idea of how you want the handhole organized is needed to understand how you can fit the items inside of the box. Some customers choose to mount the terminal to the wall of the handhole, so that it is higher, out of the way of cable slack, and easily accessible (Figure 1, Option 1). Many choose to simply place the terminals in the bottom of the handhole and avoid the cost and complexity of bracketry (Figure 1, Option 2). Both methods of storage are industry accepted. Figure 1. Terminal installation options Conduit Placement Another factor to consider is conduit orientation into the handhole. Traditionally conduits are swept into the bottom of the handholes at some angle (30-45°). These sweeps force the cables to come out of the duct at that same angle before transitioning to a horizontal or vertical loop. When trying to maximize the usable space within the handhole and reduce the needed size, it is important to consider how this is done. Duct entry into the handhole, along with the number of ducts entering, should be aligned to the products used within the duct *not to scale
2.
AEN179, Revision 0
- Page 2 of 5 © 2022 Corning Optical Communications. All rights reserved Published: 07/25/2022 along with the type of handhole used. For instance, when using a narrower and deeper handhole (flowerpot) it is best to bring the conduit into the bottom vertically. Alternatively, when working in a rectangular box, bringing the conduit horizontally into the side of the box as low as possible is better (see Figure 2). Both methods better align with where the usable storage is in the handhole, how the cable slack will be stored, and reducing the risk of potential cable damage. Bringing the conduit and cable in along the perimeter versus in the center generates extra room for cable and/or terminal placement. Verifying the number of ducts needed and their fitment is critical for handhole selection, as it can overcrowd a small box quickly or lead to potential cable damage and installation challenges. Figure 2. Conduit entry Once the conduit or cable pathway is determined, and the overall layout of the handhole is understood, one can begin to determine the minimum dimensions needed. Considerations include the size of the terminal/hardware stored in the handhole and the cables being used and routed. Also, remember that the handholes are three dimensional, and effectively using all of the space will allow use of the smallest handhole. An example of this can be seen in Figure 3. Calculating Space Needs First, the dimensions of the terminal need to be known, inclusive of the cable stub attached if applicable; but most importantly length and width. You also need to know the minimum bend diameter (MBD) of the cables that are involved. These dimensions are the starting point for understanding the need. The lid of the box must be large enough to accommodate these two items. The dimensions for Optisheath® and Evolv™ terminals are listed below, as an example. Figure 3. Handhole Space Utilization
3.
AEN179, Revision 0
- Page 3 of 5 © 2022 Corning Optical Communications. All rights reserved Published: 07/25/2022 Next add in the connector length and cable minimum bend radius (MBR), to the terminal length, as shown in the equation below. 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ + 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑟 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑏 𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑡 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ + 𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑀𝐵𝑅∗ *Could also use MBD or Recommended coil diameter Figure 4. Total hardware length This will determine one minimum dimension. Choosing MBR vs MBD in the equation above also means that the cable slack will need to be stored beside/under the terminal, or in another location, and not in the same plane as the terminal ports. If storing slack in-line with the ports of the terminal are critical, using MBD or desired coil diameter is needed. Some cable coil diameters are listed below. Cable Minimum Bend Radius Minimum Bend Diameter ROC™ 2.5" (64 mm) 5" (127mm) SST 3.2" (82 mm) 6.4" (163mm) MiniXtend® 3.23" (82 mm) 6.5" (165mm) Round ROC 2.5" (64 mm) 5" (127mm) Dual Drop 1.2" (30 mm) 2.4" (60 mm) Table 2. Cable Bending Dimensions In the case of a stubless Evolv terminal, Pushlok(TM) connectors, and ROC cable; the Evolv terminal is 6.06" in length; the mated Pushlok connector is 3.5", and the MBR for ROC is 2.5". Adding these together would tell us that the handhole needs to have a 12" minimum dimension in one direction. In this example, wanting to store the cable slack in-line with the ports would take the minimum length from 12" to 16". Evolv™ Terminal Length Width Depth 1 Port Row 2-4 Port 6.06" (154 mm) 3.29" (84 mm) 1.18" (30 mm) 6-8 Port 6.06" (154 mm) 5.29" (134 mm) 1.18" (30 mm) 12 Port 6.06" (154 mm) 7.5" (190 mm) 1.18" (30 mm) 2 Port Rows 6-8 Port 6.06" (154 mm) 3.29" (84 mm) 2.30" (58 mm) 12-16 Port 6.06" (154 mm) 5.29" (134 mm) 2.30" (58 mm) Optisheath® Terminal Length Width Depth 2-4 Port 11.3" (287 mm) 2.9" (73 mm) 2.6" (66 mm) 6-8 Port 12.3" (312 mm) 3.4" (86 mm) 3.0" (76 mm) 12 Port 15.0" (381 mm) 5.8" (147 mm) 4.0" (101 mm) Table 1. Terminal Size Comparison
4.
AEN179, Revision 0
- Page 4 of 5 © 2022 Corning Optical Communications. All rights reserved Published: 07/25/2022 Figure 5. MBR vs MBD If the terminal stub has a connector on the other end that will be mated inside the same handhole, such as FlexNAP™, the equation for that length is below. This length does not need to be combined with the length above if the tails of the terminal provide enough length to route inside the handhole. This length is critical though, as it is not always flexible like the cable, and in some cases can be longer than the terminal length calculated above. 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ + 𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 1 𝑀𝐵𝑅 + 𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 2 𝑀𝐵𝑅 Figure 6. Total Connector Length If it is desired to mount the terminal inside the handhole, with or without a bracket, the length requirements mentioned above must be determined in conjunction with the box's shape. Using the numbers from above, an Evolv™ terminal with drops mated needs to have 12" of continuous length, in any dimension. This indicates that a rectangular handhole will need one side that can accommodate that length along the flat side, without getting into the corners. A good example of a handhole that would work in this scenario is a 10"x15"x12". The 15" long side provides enough room to mount the terminal and bracket to the wall with room for the cables to be routed down into the bottom of the handhole. Figure 7 illustrates the space needed for an Evolv terminal compared to an Optisheath® terminal.
5.
AEN179, Revision 0
- Page 5 of 5 © 2022 Corning Optical Communications. All rights reserved Published: 07/25/2022 Figure 7. Terminal envelope In the case where the terminal and cable slack are not mounted to the wall, the space can be used more creatively. The space needed to fit everything could be accommodated by placing the terminal at an angle within the handhole. Below are some conservative handhole sizes that can accommodate being used with the Evolv™ terminals and drop products. Using the space more efficiently could allow for smaller packaging and handholes. As mentioned above, the rectangular handholes tend to provide better options when multiple ducts are entering and exiting the space, where the cylindrical handholes work well at customer premises and places where the cables are direct buried on exit. Lid Shape Length Width Depth Rectangle 15" 10" 12" Square 11" 11" 16" Round - 12" 18" Table 3. Evolv Handhole Examples Multi-Use Handholes Often handholes need to be used for more than one function. Some of the handholes may strictly house terminals, and some drop slack. These typically allow the use of something smaller. There may be other handholes that need to accommodate multiple items, such as larger cables or splice enclosures. In these cases the same formulas and considerations apply. Bringing the conduit into the base of the handhole in a horizontal plane allows the cable to easily transition into a vertical or horizontal coil. The splice enclosure could be mounted to the wall of the vault or left lying in the bottom. Either way, the length of the closure plus the bend radius of the cables entering need to be considered to determine the minimum length needed in the handhole. Once that is understood, adding in the envelope needed to store a terminal and drop slack will determine if a larger handhole is needed, or if the existing vault is sufficient. Contact your Corning representative if you would like to discuss more options and how the products can work in your network.