SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 15
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Microsoft MDOP delivers a three-year ROI of 532% with a payback
period of 4.6 months.
Benefits include:
 Automating processes and providing management and visibility and
quicker resolution to PC problems increased IT staff productivity,
reducing the costs to support PCs by $194 per PC per year.
 End-user productivity loss from downtime, calls to the help desk,
and self-troubleshooting was reduced by 63%, restoring to each
user eight hours of 100% productive time and saving $290 per PC
per year.
 Other cost savings, including the reduction in spending on third-
party software solutions and better management of IT resources,
totaled $23 per PC per year.
Business Value Highlights
title
W H I T E P AP E R
D e s k t o p O p t i m i z a t i o n U s i n g M D O P : C o n t i n u e d I n v e s t m e n t
L e a d s t o B e t t e r V a l u e
Sponsored by: Microsoft Corp.
Al Gillen Randy Perry
Nancy Selig
May 2013
E X E C U T I V E S U M M AR Y
A well-managed environment consistently outperforms an inconsistent or poorly
managed environment, and a well-managed environment will result in better uptime,
lower cost of management, and
fewer help desk calls. Fewer
problems lead to happier — and
more productive — end users. IDC
research finds that companies
investing in tools that allow a PC
environment to be better managed
and kept more secure and well
prepared for a recovery — should it
become necessary — have lower
operational costs and can
experience a significant return on
investment (ROI) associated with
their management tools.
Such is the case when using the
Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack
(MDOP), a primarily client-side
management suite that offers six discrete solutions to help personalize the user
experience, simplify application deployment, and improve application compatibility
with the Windows operating system. In addition, MDOP includes products that help
manage, monitor, and deploy key Windows features such as BitLocker and Group
Policy. Using MDOP shifts desktop repair from reactive to proactive, saving time and
removing challenges associated with troubleshooting and repairing system failures.
IDC found that a PC that uses all six MDOP solutions can realize annual IT
productivity savings as high as $194 per year per managed PC, or a 36% reduction in
annual cost, compared with a PC that is not using the MDOP suite. In addition, end
users see a productivity gain, with a cost savings associated with improved user
productivity calculated at an additional $290 per PC per year. Together with savings
realized by the elimination of third-party software, hardware, and additional software
licensing costs, operational cost savings can reach a combined total of up to $508 per
PC per year.
GlobalHeadquarters:5SpeenStreetFramingham,MA01701USAP.508.872.8200F.508.935.4015www.idc.com
2 #241034 ©2013 IDC
These cost savings and benefits are broken out into the following key areas:
 Cost savings associated with improved IT productivity and efficiency. This may
include the benefit of accelerating routine tasks such as rolling out new PCs,
operating systems, or applications and recovering failed systems. It also can
include the reduction in recovery/repair activities due to more stable and reliable
PC configurations. By automating processes and providing management and
visibility and quicker resolution to PC problems, companies in this study were
able to reduce the IT labor costs associated with PC deployment and annual
support of PC operations, including help desk operations, by $194 per PC
per year.
 Cost savings associated with improved end-user productivity. MDOP enhances
end-user productivity by reducing the time users lose to problems with PC
operations. End users experience less downtime, or when there is a system failure,
they are able to recover and restore operations more quickly. This study found that
downtime and help desk issues and instances of user self-troubleshooting were
significantly reduced, restoring eight hours of 100% productivity to each end user
and saving $290 per PC per year.
 Other cost savings, including the reduction in spending on third-party software
solutions previously used by companies in this study. Better management of IT
resources also led to reductions in the costs associated with hardware, software
licensing, and deployment management support, which enabled companies to
reduce third-party support. Savings in this area totaled $23 per PC per year.
 The cost reductions found by IDC's analysis led to a strong ROI story. On
average, companies experienced discounted benefits of $1,220 per PC over a
three-year period at a total discounted investment of $195 per PC. The
investment yields an ROI of 532% over three years. Companies included in this
study on average were able to pay back their initial investment in 4.6 months,
making a strong justification for acquiring and deploying MDOP.
Summarizing the findings, IDC found a substantial and quickly recognizable payback
associated with using the MDOP suite, particularly for organizations that embrace the
technology and use at least several components included in MDOP. The study found
that the greater the number of MDOP components that an individual customer
deployed, the greater the overall benefit the customer experienced.
The only consideration for customers is that gaining access to MDOP requires a
Volume License contract with Windows Client Software Assurance (SA) because
MDOP can be purchased only by SA customers. But given that prerequisite, the
relatively low acquisition cost of MDOP (a list price of $10 per PC per year) ensures
substantial benefit from the incremental investment.
©2013 IDC #241034 3
I N T H I S W H I T E P AP E R
This IDC White Paper considers the operational experiences of customer sites that
are using the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack to manage and maintain their PCs
and calculates a total cost of ownership (TCO) and ROI model associated with using
these products.
M E T H O D O L O G Y
IDC identified, screened, and qualified multiple end-user organizations and used the
experiences of these organizations as a representative model of the effect of
acquiring and deploying MDOP. As part of this work, IDC conducted a series of
interviews with these companies about their use of MDOP and carefully probed
customers about their experience with components within the MDOP suite that they
are using. This analysis involved capturing the operational characteristics of their
environment, including frequency of end-user problems, outages, help desk calls, and
time spent by IT professionals to support PCs within the organization, both before and
after their deployment of the MDOP suite.
This information is used to create a before and after model for these organizations
depicting their operational costs and how those costs are affected by the use of one
or multiple components of MDOP. This data is used to calculate TCO and ROI. For
more detail, please see the Appendix.
S T U D Y D E M O G R AP H I C S
The demographics for the organizations IDC interviewed are illustrated in Table 1.
Median values for these organizations include 4,250 employees, 65 IT employees,
and 3,875 PCs. The PC count being lower than the number of employees implies that
these organizations are in a business vertical where there is some PC sharing or shift
scheduled that does not mandate one PC per employee. This global study included
interviews with organizations in Europe, Asia/Pacific, and the United States.
Being progressive organizations that carry Software Assurance on their PCs, it comes
as little surprise that there is comparatively less Windows XP installed at these
organizations than would be found industrywide because SA increases the potential
for and lowers the expense of migrating to the newest version of Windows.
Windows 7 penetration is about where we would expect to see it, but Windows 8
adoption is far beyond what we see industrywide. IDC notes that the Windows 8
penetration rate was elevated studywide by one organization that had largely migrated
its entire PC installed base to the most current Windows product (see Table 1).
4 #241034 ©2013 IDC
T A B L E 1
I n t e r v i e w C o m p a n y D e m o g r a p h i c s
Employees (median) 4,250
IT staff (median) 65
PCs (median) 3,875
% of PCs by operating system
Windows XP 22
Windows 7 48
Windows 8 21
Other (non-Windows) 9
% of PCs covered by MDOP 100
Average MDOP products in use per organization 3.4
Source: IDC, 2013
S I T U AT I O N O V E R V I E W
The Windows desktop environment is entering a period of significant change, brought on
in part by the introduction of Windows 7 and Windows 8 in a relatively short period of time.
Further complicating things for IT professionals is the bring-your-own-device (BYOD) trend
that is altering how users and IT departments interact now and in the future.
Never before has IT faced a more complicated and faster-changing challenge. If ever
there was a need for sophisticated and efficient tools to manage this changing IT
environment, it is now.
At the same time, these changing times create an ideal inflection point to move to
smarter management tools that reduce the burden on IT posed by routine
maintenance and support issues. The opportunities exist to improve application
delivery, extend user state virtualization, and protect data on PCs even if the device
should end up in the wrong hands. Desktop virtualization technologies are another
dimension that not only improves the usability of existing PCs but also can help
extend the application experience to BYOD users.
IDC research indicates that organizations that combine a greater emphasis on a
consistent and standardized software stack on their PCs generally enjoy lower long-
term operational cost thanks to that more consistent environment. The key to
deploying — and maintaining — consistency is the use of management tools that
make it practical to empower employees to be productive with their PCs but at the
same time prevent systems from individually diverging significantly from the standard
build of the corporate software environment.
©2013 IDC #241034 5
W h a t I s I n c l u d e d i n M D O P ?
The MDOP suite can be grouped into three broad functional areas: tools that help
solve compatibility issues and make deployment easier through virtualization
technology, tools that generally enhance IT management and security and boost IT
and user productivity, and tools that speed PC recovery or proactively boost user
productivity.
 Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V). Using App-V, customers can
stream an application to individual desktops on an as-needed basis, with those
applications deploying in a virtualized environment aboard the PC, insulated from
other applications.
 Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V). This relatively new
component of MDOP incorporates some concepts that historically were
associated with Windows but were not previously widely used by customers. The
UE-V product enables user state virtualization, making it possible to deliver a
user's personal Windows experience across multiple devices. This includes
delivery of a consistent look and feel regardless of how Windows and
applications are deployed. UE-V makes it possible to use multiple Windows 7
and Windows 8 devices and gain a consistent experience with each instance.
 Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM). This technology
makes administration of BitLocker implementations simpler and more practical
for enterprise-level deployments. MBAM simplifies deployment and key recovery,
centralizes compliance reporting and enforcement, and can lower administration
costs associated with provisioning and supporting encrypted drives within an
organization.
 Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGPM). Most customers
running a Windows server infrastructure also use Active Directory and Group
Policy Objects (GPOs) to manage the configuration and use rights on PCs.
AGPM empowers IT staff to review and modify GPOs without affecting employee
desktops and allows for greater control over how edits are made and applied,
resulting in a much richer level of PC manageability.
 Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT). The DaRT product is a set
of 14 individual tools that help diagnose and repair a PC that has failed — even if it
won't boot into safe mode — remove malicious code, or recover deleted files.
 Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V). This product is used to
support applications that are incompatible with Windows 7 by continuing to run
the applications within a Windows XP virtual workspace on a Windows 7
machine.
During the in-depth interviews that took place with customers, IDC captured
information about which elements of the MDOP suite customers were using. Figure 1
highlights the usage of individual MDOP products on the PCs in use at customers
interviewed for this analysis.
6 #241034 ©2013 IDC
As depicted in Figure 1, the most commonly used solution was App-V, followed
closely by UE-V. App-V usage is higher in this study compared with a previous IDC
study, and it appears that this product has become the single most attractive solution
for customers.
Another relatively new addition to the MDOP suite, MBAM is the third most widely
used product at 63% of PCs. The least used of the MDOP products on the PCs in use
within the survey sample is MED-V. Among mainstream end-user employees, MED-V
is likely to see decreasing use as customers get further away from a hybrid Windows
XP and Windows 7/Windows 8 mix of products.
F I G U R E 1
C u s t o m e r U s e o f I n d i v i d u a l M D O P P r o d u c t s
Source: IDC, 2013
B U S I N E S S V AL U E O F M D O P
IDC research takes a broader look at ROI and TCO and describes these metrics
using the concept of "business value." Business value is an expansion of the basic
value proposition offered by the acquisition and deployment of a product and extends
that view to include the benefits realized by end users through better uptime and
productivity, the avoidance of server downtime, and the resulting improved business
agility that allows companies to deploy applications faster and more reliably.
With our research around the use of MDOP suite products, we use a business value
metric to measure the annual TCO and ROI benefits associated with PCs that use
MDOP compared with PCs managed without the benefit of MDOP.
13
50
50
63
75
88
0 20 40 60 80 100
Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization
(MED-V)
Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset
(DaRT)
Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management
(AGPM)
Microsoft BitLocker Administration and
Monitoring (MBAM)
Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V)
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
(% of Windows PCs)
©2013 IDC #241034 7
Table 2 presents the cost reductions associated with the deployment of MDOP.
Overall, cost reductions associated with IT productivity, when combined with end-user
productivity gains and other cost savings, based on the presumed use of all six
products included in MDOP, can lead to an average annual benefit of up to $508 per
PC. Use of fewer than all six MDOP products will lead to a lower overall cost benefit.
This $508 benefit is composed of the following contributions:
 IT productivity. This includes routine tasks such as rolling out new PCs,
operating systems, or applications and recovering failed systems. It also can
include the reduction in recovery/repair activities due to more stable and reliable
PC configurations. MDOP use leads to savings of up to $194 per PC per year, or
roughly four hours per PC per year.
 End-user productivity. End users experience less downtime and fewer other
PC issues that impact operations. When there is a problem, IT can recover and
restore operations more quickly. MDOP use leads to savings of up to $290 per
PC per year. This line item accounted for over half, or 57%, of the total cost
savings that is attributable to MDOP.
 Other cost savings. This includes the reduction in spending on third-party
software solutions and reductions in hardware costs and software licensing and
deployment that enable companies to reduce third-party support. MDOP use
leads to savings of up to $23 per PC per year.
T A B L E 2
A n n u a l B e n e f i t s o f U s i n g M D O P
Cost Savings per PC per Year ($) % of Total
IT productivity 194 38
End-user productivity 290 57
Other cost savings 23 5
Total 508
Source: IDC, 2013
8 #241034 ©2013 IDC
T h e I m p a c t o n I T P r o d u c t i v i t y
As depicted in Table 3, the $194 in annual productivity savings per PC for IT staff is a
composite of cost savings in several common IT activity areas: annual management,
PC deployment, help desk, and downtime (and subsequent recovery).
 PC deployment costs — IT staff time associated with new PC deployments such
as staging and logistics, installing PC operating system images, installing or
provisioning applications on new PCs, configuring disk encryption and other
security measures to ensure long-term protection of corporate assets, and
supporting PCs immediately after deployment
 Annual management costs — Ongoing PC management, including provisioning
and/or installing additional new applications, updating/replacing existing
applications, ensuring content is secure on laptops that may be lost or stolen
 Help desk costs — IT staff time to answer calls to the help desk and resolve PC
issues such as software compatibility, access, and updates
 Downtime costs — IT staff time to respond to and resolve hardware and
operating system failures and other system outages
As noted in Table 3, the biggest change on a percentage basis came from help desk
cost reductions (65%) and downtime cost reductions (76%). However, in terms
of absolute dollars, the more significant reduction was associated with annual
management costs, which contracted by $106 per PC per year, compared with PCs not
using MDOP solutions.
T A B L E 3
I T P r o d u c t i v i t y C o s t S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r A t t r i b u t e d t o M D O P
Before ($) After ($) Savings ($) % Change
Annual management 356 250 106 30
PC deployment 94 69 25 26
Help desk 74 26 48 65
Downtime 19 5 15 76
Total 543 349 194 36
Source: IDC, 2013
©2013 IDC #241034 9
U n d e r s t a n d i n g U s e r P r o d u c t i v i t y
Table 4 shows user productivity cost savings in the following areas:
 Help desk: Productivity loss associated with end users waiting on or working
with help desk personnel to resolve a PC issue
 Downtime: Productivity loss associated with downtime when a PC is not
available for use due to planned or unplanned downtime
 Self-service: Productivity loss associated with end users working to solve PC
problems themselves (This could include searching for resolution to problems or
time spent waiting for reboots or patch installation to complete in an effort to
resolve a problem the user faces.)
As depicted in Table 4, the $290 in annual productivity savings per PC per year for
end users is a composite of four areas. The single largest cost savings area, in terms
of both absolute dollars and percent change, is the reduction in time spent waiting for
help desk support. The cost savings is $140, or nearly half of the $290 total cost
savings. This area realized an 85% reduction in costs, which dropped from $165
per PC per year to $25 per PC per year. The next most significant savings came from
the dramatic reduction in time spent with self-service support. On average, MDOP is
saving each PC user nearly 16 hours per year. Unlike downtime, which is a total loss
in productivity, self-service activities result in less than 20% loss. The use of MDOP
dropped loss from self-service troubleshooting from $190 to $79 per PC per year, a
59% reduction.
T A B L E 4
U s e r P r o d u c t i v i t y C o s t S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r A t t r i b u t e d t o M D O P
Before ($) After ($) Savings ($) % Change
Help desk 165 25 140 85
Downtime 49 10 39 80
Self-service 190 79 112 59
Total 404 113 290 72
Source: IDC, 2013
10 #241034 ©2013 IDC
B r e a k i n g D o w n M D O P S a v i n g s b y P r o d u c t
MDOP products are available only as a suite — that is, individual products are not
available on a standalone basis. However, typically customers do not use every
product in the MDOP suite. Indeed, the customers in this study used, on average,
3.4 of the 6 products included in MDOP. Given that the incremental cost to add
MDOP to an existing Volume License agreement with Windows Client Software
Assurance is only $10 per PC per year, the use of a single MDOP product can more
than offset that incremental cost, and the use of 3.4 MDOP products indicates a
strong value proposition.
Use of MDOP products is likely to be more closely related to broader corporate
initiatives to manage operational expenses rather than the exact savings associated
with each individual product. Nevertheless, Table 5 breaks out the cost savings per
PC per year for each of the six MDOP products.
As noted in Table 5, the largest contributors to cost savings were MBAM, with a $58
cost savings, or 30% of the overall $194 cost savings total, followed by App-V, at 26%
of the overall total, or $50 in cost savings. Other contributors to cost savings were
DaRT, at 19% of the total cost savings, and UE-V, at 16% of the overall cost savings.
T A B L E 5
M D O P P r o d u c t - R e l a t e d I T S t a f f L a b o r S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r
Value ($) % of Total Hours
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) 50 26 1.2
Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V) 30 16 0.70
Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM) 58 30 1.3
Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGPM) 9 5 0.21
Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT) 37 19 0.87
Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V) 10 5 0.22
Total 194 4.5
Source: IDC, 2013
©2013 IDC #241034 11
C o s t t o D e p l o y a n d U s e M D O P
When it comes to reducing costs related to IT, rarely is there a free ride. To recognize
a return on an investment, an organization must first make an investment. Initial costs
include the server hardware and software needed to support the MDOP applications;
the IT labor required to install the servers and deploy MDOP; and training for IT to
use MDOP, which includes any training services and the cost of the time IT staff
spend in training.
Annual costs include IT labor to support the MDOP applications and the servers and
the annual license fees for Windows Client Software Assurance and MDOP. Table 6
captures this specific metric and introduces the costs that organizations interviewed in
this study experienced to deploy and use MDOP.
The acquisition, deployment, and operational costs identified in Table 6 are amortized
over a three-year period. These costs are used as one of the baseline values for the
ROI calculations made in this analysis.
IDC notes that while MDOP costs $10 per PC per year, the requirement of having SA
in place adds an additional $55 per PC per year, which leads to higher overall
acquisition costs for organizations that do not currently have SA in place. Customers
tend to not see MDOP on the basis of its standalone cost; rather, they see it as a
component of a much larger investment (including SA), as indicated in Table 6. In
reality, SA is not simply an MDOP prerequisite; it is a separate product that offers a
value proposition that includes upgrade rights to the latest Windows client operating
system version as well as a variety of training, support, and additional use rights that
go beyond the standard licensing terms.
T A B L E 6
T h r e e - Y e a r I n v e s t m e n t A s s o c i a t e d w i t h D e p l o y i n g a n d U s i n g M D O P ( $ )
Hardware 11
IT labor install 2
Training 15
Cost per seat for MDOP 195
Ongoing FTE 1
Total 224
Source: IDC, 2013
12 #241034 ©2013 IDC
R O I AN AL Y S I S
IDC uses the net present value (NPV) of the savings and increased revenue over
three years in calculating the ROI and payback period for the deployment. The NPV
of the savings is determined by subtracting the amount that would have been earned
by investing the original sum in an instrument yielding a 12% return (to allow for the
missed opportunity cost that could have been realized using that capital). This
accounts for both the assumed cost of money and the assumed rate of return. The
ROI analysis is shown in Table 7.
T A B L E 7
T h r e e - Y e a r R O I A n a l y s i s p e r P C
Benefit (discounted) $1,220
Investment (discounted) $195
Net present value $1,025
ROI = NPV/investment 532%
Payback 4.6 months
Discount factor 12%
Source: IDC, 2013
On average, companies identified discounted benefits of $1,220 per PC for a three-
year period at a total discounted investment of $195 per PC. The investment yields a
return of 532% over three years. Companies included in this study on average were
able to pay back their initial investment in 4.6 months.
F U T U R E O U T L O O K
Given the significant change sweeping over the industry today, the time has never
been better to establish a secure and responsible approach to deployment and
management of PCs. Microsoft has long encouraged customers to incorporate
stronger PC configuration and management processes into their environments;
deploying MDOP is one effective way to help reach that objective.
Unfortunately, not all customers can rationalize the benefit of an investment in
management, and some customers, particularly smaller businesses, tend to use
few management tools — sometimes none at all. IDC expects that the difficulty
of client management will continue to decline over time, offset by new challenges
caused by BYOD trends.
©2013 IDC #241034 13
C H AL L E N G E S / O P P O R T U N I T I E S
Every product solution has a market segment where it has a best fit and yet may be
challenged to be equally successful in other market segments. MDOP is no different.
It has significant strength among large enterprise customers, but it is not nearly so
successful among small and medium-sized businesses.
 Challenge: Not all customers have SA. The most common way for customers
to gain access to purchase MDOP from Microsoft is to have a Volume License
agreement with Windows Client Software Assurance. However, there are several
other ways to indirectly gain access to MDOP, specifically for customers that
acquire Microsoft Virtual Desktop Access (VDA) licenses or have a subscription
to Windows Intune. Without one of these relationships in place, customers
cannot acquire MDOP today. This means that for customers that do not have or
do not plan to acquire a Volume License or VDA seats, MDOP is not a viable
solution simply because it is not available.
 Opportunity: MDOP is still relevant for virtualized client deployments.
Virtual client computing does not relieve an IT department from treating the
virtual client instances as full Windows desktops, and much of the functionality
included in MDOP applies to virtual clients just as it does to physical clients. A
customer that chooses to use a Microsoft competitor as its primary client
virtualization supplier still can benefit from the other five products included in the
MDOP suite, as those products remain relevant and valuable even if a customer
opts to not use MED-V.
C O N C L U S I O N
A well-managed environment will consistently outperform an environment that has
less sophistication, less consistency, or less lockdown — in terms of uptime, cost of
management, help desk calls, and a variety of other metrics. Advanced management
tools, when applied and used properly, offer a return on the investment required to
deploy them that exceeds the original deployment cost over a period of three years.
IDC found that a PC that uses all six MDOP solutions can realize annual IT productivity
savings as high as $194 per year, or a 36% reduction in annual cost, compared with a
PC that is not using the MDOP suite. Further, end users see a productivity gain as well,
with a cost savings associated with improved user productivity calculated at an
additional $290 per PC per year. Full cost savings, including other miscellaneous costs
that result from the use of MDOP, can reach $508 per PC per year.
IDC found a substantial and quickly recognizable payback associated with using the
MDOP suite for organizations that embrace the technology and use at least several
components of the suite. As organizations continue transitioning to Windows 7 and
Windows 8, the timing could not be better to adopt a consistent PC deployment and
management approach. MDOP can be an effective tool to reach that goal.
14 #241034 ©2013 IDC
AP P E N D I X
IDC utilized its standard ROI methodology for this project. This methodology is
based on gathering data from current users of the technology as the foundation for
the model.
As part of this study, IDC identified, screened, and qualified eight end-user
organizations and constructed a study group to be used as a representative sample
of the industry. As part of this work, IDC conducted a series of interviews with these
companies about their use of MDOP and carefully probed customers about their
experience with components within the MDOP suite that they are using. This analysis
involved capturing the operational characteristics of their environment, including
frequency of end-user problems, outages, help desk calls, and time spent by IT
professionals to support PCs within the organization, both before and after their
deployment of the MDOP suite.
Based on these interviews, IDC performs a three-step process to calculate the ROI
and payback period:
1. Measure the savings from reduced IT costs (staff, hardware, software,
maintenance, and IT support), increased user productivity, and improved
revenue over the term of the deployment.
2. Ascertain the investment made in deploying the solution and the associated
training and support costs.
3. Project the costs and savings over a three-year period and calculate the ROI and
payback for the deployed solution.
IDC uses the NPV of the savings and increased revenue over three years in
calculating the ROI and payback period for the deployment. The NPV of the savings
is determined by subtracting the amount that would have been earned by investing
the original sum in an instrument yielding a 12% return (to allow for the missed
opportunity cost that could have been realized using that capital).
IDC bases the payback period and ROI calculations on a number of assumptions,
which are summarized as follows:
1. Time values are multiplied by burdened salary (salary + 28% for benefits and
overhead) to quantify efficiency and manager productivity savings.
2. Downtime values are a product of the number of hours of downtime multiplied by
the number of users affected.
3. The impact of unplanned downtime is quantified in terms of impaired end-user
productivity and lost revenue.
4. Lost productivity is a product of downtime multiplied by burdened salary.
5. Lost revenue is a product of downtime multiplied by the average revenue
generated per hour.
©2013 IDC #241034 15
6. The NPV of the three-year savings is calculated by subtracting the amount that
would have been realized by investing the original sum in an instrument yielding a
12% return to allow for the missed opportunity cost. This accounts for both the
assumed cost of money and the assumed rate of return.
Because every hour of downtime does not equate to a lost hour of productivity or
revenue generation, IDC attributes only a fraction of the result to savings. As part of
our assessment, we asked each company what fraction of downtime hours to use in
calculating productivity savings and the reduction in lost revenue. IDC then taxes the
revenue at that rate.
Further, because IT solutions require a deployment period, the full benefits of the
solution are not available during deployment. To capture this reality, IDC prorates the
benefits on a monthly basis and then subtracts the deployment time from the first-
year savings.
Note: All numbers in this document may not be exact due to rounding.
C o p y r i g h t N o t i c e
External Publication of IDC Information and Data — Any IDC information that is to be
used in advertising, press releases, or promotional materials requires prior written
approval from the appropriate IDC Vice President or Country Manager. A draft of the
proposed document should accompany any such request. IDC reserves the right to
deny approval of external usage for any reason.
Copyright 2013 IDC. Reproduction without written permission is completely forbidden.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Going Green Whitepaper
Going Green WhitepaperGoing Green Whitepaper
Going Green WhitepaperUdayRavi
 
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...Veeam Software
 
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plans
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plansRight size enterprise disaster recovery plans
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plansInfo-Tech Research Group
 
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Business
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your BusinessBusiness Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Business
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Businessat MicroFocus Italy ❖✔
 
BYOD: Six Essentials for Success
BYOD: Six Essentials for SuccessBYOD: Six Essentials for Success
BYOD: Six Essentials for SuccessDMIMarketing
 
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)Kay Winkler
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 IT
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 ITCost Reduction Guide Issue 6 IT
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 ITymw15
 
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.com
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.comCmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.com
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.comULLPTT
 
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s s
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s sP r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s s
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s smatele41
 
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...Camila De Araujo
 
Velocis Presentations
Velocis PresentationsVelocis Presentations
Velocis PresentationsHitesh Patel
 
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save Money
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save MoneyIBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save Money
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save MoneyIBMAsean
 
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturity
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturityEnd-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturity
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturityDImension Data
 

Was ist angesagt? (15)

Going Green Whitepaper
Going Green WhitepaperGoing Green Whitepaper
Going Green Whitepaper
 
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...
The Voice of the Customer - How to enable Availability for the Always-On Ente...
 
It for management 1
It for management 1It for management 1
It for management 1
 
Consumer tech invasion
Consumer tech invasionConsumer tech invasion
Consumer tech invasion
 
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plans
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plansRight size enterprise disaster recovery plans
Right size enterprise disaster recovery plans
 
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Business
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your BusinessBusiness Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Business
Business Risk: Effective Technology Protecting Your Business
 
BYOD: Six Essentials for Success
BYOD: Six Essentials for SuccessBYOD: Six Essentials for Success
BYOD: Six Essentials for Success
 
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)
OPEN SOURCE BPM vs. Programación (RED HAT)
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 IT
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 ITCost Reduction Guide Issue 6 IT
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 6 IT
 
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.com
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.comCmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.com
Cmgt 554 cmgt554 cmgt 554 forecasting and strategic planning -uopstudy.com
 
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s s
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s sP r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s s
P r o t e c t i n g y o u r b u s i n e s s
 
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...
A Comparative Analysis of Project Management Information Systems to Support C...
 
Velocis Presentations
Velocis PresentationsVelocis Presentations
Velocis Presentations
 
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save Money
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save MoneyIBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save Money
IBM and GREEN IT; Green IT – How to Make IT Work and Save Money
 
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturity
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturityEnd-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturity
End-User Computing Insights: A study of digital maturity
 

Andere mochten auch

TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATER
TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATERTRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATER
TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATERMicrosoft
 
Transformér dine produkter med teknologi
Transformér dine produkter med teknologiTransformér dine produkter med teknologi
Transformér dine produkter med teknologiMicrosoft
 
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?Microsoft
 
FREMTIDENS CFO
FREMTIDENS CFOFREMTIDENS CFO
FREMTIDENS CFOMicrosoft
 
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό συλλαλητήριο
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό  συλλαλητήριομεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό  συλλαλητήριο
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό συλλαλητήριοpapazaniaggeliki
 
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processer
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processerNyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processer
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processerMicrosoft
 
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingen
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingenStandardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingen
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingenMicrosoft
 
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomheden
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomhedenBusiness casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomheden
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomhedenMicrosoft
 
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...Microsoft
 
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестора
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестораМедиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестора
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестораВиктор Крысов (Viktor Krysov)
 
Social listening
Social listeningSocial listening
Social listeningMicrosoft
 
Group Brainstorming - Jason Mraz
Group Brainstorming - Jason MrazGroup Brainstorming - Jason Mraz
Group Brainstorming - Jason Mrazdannyhammond1
 
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...Microsoft
 
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...Microsoft
 
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...Microsoft
 
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...Microsoft
 
GDPR for CIOs i praksis
GDPR for CIOs i praksisGDPR for CIOs i praksis
GDPR for CIOs i praksisMicrosoft
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Неизвестное об известном. Выпуск 2
Неизвестное об известном. Выпуск 2Неизвестное об известном. Выпуск 2
Неизвестное об известном. Выпуск 2
 
оргмомент
оргмоменторгмомент
оргмомент
 
TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATER
TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATERTRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATER
TRANSFORMATION MED KANT OG MÅLBARE RESULTATER
 
Transformér dine produkter med teknologi
Transformér dine produkter med teknologiTransformér dine produkter med teknologi
Transformér dine produkter med teknologi
 
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?
Starter unikke kundeoplevelser i Marketing eller IT?
 
FREMTIDENS CFO
FREMTIDENS CFOFREMTIDENS CFO
FREMTIDENS CFO
 
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό συλλαλητήριο
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό  συλλαλητήριομεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό  συλλαλητήριο
μεγάλο πανεκπαιδευτικό συλλαλητήριο
 
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processer
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processerNyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processer
Nyt strategisk fokus i Stark skabte nye salgskanaler og -processer
 
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingen
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingenStandardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingen
Standardisering og effektivitet i IT afdelingen
 
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomheden
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomhedenBusiness casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomheden
Business casen for sociale netværk og integreret kommunikation i virksomheden
 
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...
Den Moderne Arbejdsplads - New Ways of Working i ISS, af Jeff Gravenhorst, Gr...
 
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестора
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестораМедиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестора
Медиапроект Pubtime. Презентация для инвестора
 
Трейвиш А.И. Страноведение Лекция 1
Трейвиш А.И. Страноведение Лекция 1Трейвиш А.И. Страноведение Лекция 1
Трейвиш А.И. Страноведение Лекция 1
 
Social listening
Social listeningSocial listening
Social listening
 
Group Brainstorming - Jason Mraz
Group Brainstorming - Jason MrazGroup Brainstorming - Jason Mraz
Group Brainstorming - Jason Mraz
 
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...
Business Insight 2014 - Fra erfaringsbaseret til videns baseret produktion, s...
 
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...
Cyber Security Conference - Informationssikkerhed og tryghed i digitalisering...
 
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...
Microsoft Next 2014 - Productivity session 3b - Yammer og Lundbeck, v. Martin...
 
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...
Microsoft Sales Leadership konference - FRA DATA TIL BUNDLINJE V. Lars Bo Gra...
 
GDPR for CIOs i praksis
GDPR for CIOs i praksisGDPR for CIOs i praksis
GDPR for CIOs i praksis
 

Ähnlich wie MDOP

Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea idc - may 2012
Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea   idc - may 2012Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea   idc - may 2012
Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea idc - may 2012ROCK-IT Enterprise (CIC)
 
Finding the value in byod capgemini consulting - digital transformation
Finding the value in byod   capgemini consulting - digital transformationFinding the value in byod   capgemini consulting - digital transformation
Finding the value in byod capgemini consulting - digital transformationRick Bouter
 
Finding the value in BYOD
Finding the value in BYODFinding the value in BYOD
Finding the value in BYODCapgemini
 
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5TEI of Microsoft 365 E5
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5Daniel Chang
 
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT CostsKaren Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costspvjeff
 
Optimizing Technology Refresh
Optimizing Technology RefreshOptimizing Technology Refresh
Optimizing Technology Refreshxpmigration
 
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wp
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wpIdc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wp
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wpkimsach
 
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...Scalable Software
 
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...IBM India Smarter Computing
 
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?Dell World
 
Impacto Economico de windows virtual server
Impacto Economico de windows virtual serverImpacto Economico de windows virtual server
Impacto Economico de windows virtual serverCade Soluciones
 
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...Windows 7 Professional
 
White Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSSWhite Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSSEd Aussem
 
The Future of Convergence Paper
The Future of Convergence PaperThe Future of Convergence Paper
The Future of Convergence PaperHitachi Vantara
 
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology Optimization
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology OptimizationBuilding a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology Optimization
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology OptimizationInsight
 
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution information
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution informationMicro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution information
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution informationMicro Focus
 

Ähnlich wie MDOP (20)

Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea idc - may 2012
Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea   idc - may 2012Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea   idc - may 2012
Why sticking with windows xp is a bad idea idc - may 2012
 
Finding the value in byod capgemini consulting - digital transformation
Finding the value in byod   capgemini consulting - digital transformationFinding the value in byod   capgemini consulting - digital transformation
Finding the value in byod capgemini consulting - digital transformation
 
Idc report quatifying e mobility_roi
Idc report quatifying e mobility_roiIdc report quatifying e mobility_roi
Idc report quatifying e mobility_roi
 
Finding the value in BYOD
Finding the value in BYODFinding the value in BYOD
Finding the value in BYOD
 
desktop os windows7
desktop os windows7desktop os windows7
desktop os windows7
 
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5TEI of Microsoft 365 E5
TEI of Microsoft 365 E5
 
Total Economic Impact – 0365 E5
Total Economic Impact – 0365 E5Total Economic Impact – 0365 E5
Total Economic Impact – 0365 E5
 
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT CostsKaren Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costs
 
Optimizing Technology Refresh
Optimizing Technology RefreshOptimizing Technology Refresh
Optimizing Technology Refresh
 
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wp
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wpIdc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wp
Idc quantifying-business-value-v mware-view-wp
 
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...
IT Cost Optimization POC Highlights: Creating Business Value from Software Us...
 
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...
Consolidating sap applications for improved operational costs looking at sap ...
 
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?
Cloud: To Build or Buy - Can You Justify On-Premises IT?
 
Impacto Economico de windows virtual server
Impacto Economico de windows virtual serverImpacto Economico de windows virtual server
Impacto Economico de windows virtual server
 
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...
The benefit of using Windows 7 Professional in small and medium business a wh...
 
White Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSSWhite Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSS
 
The Future of Convergence Paper
The Future of Convergence PaperThe Future of Convergence Paper
The Future of Convergence Paper
 
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology Optimization
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology OptimizationBuilding a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology Optimization
Building a Modern Workplace: The Value Add of Technology Optimization
 
White Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSSWhite Paper on IBM MTSS
White Paper on IBM MTSS
 
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution information
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution informationMicro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution information
Micro focus visual cobol & mainframe solution information
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdf
Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdfLandscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdf
Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdfAarwolf Industries LLC
 
Data governance with Unity Catalog Presentation
Data governance with Unity Catalog PresentationData governance with Unity Catalog Presentation
Data governance with Unity Catalog PresentationKnoldus Inc.
 
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...Alkin Tezuysal
 
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Mark Simos
 
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkReact Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkPixlogix Infotech
 
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsInfrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsYoss Cohen
 
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Hiroshi SHIBATA
 
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxA Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxAna-Maria Mihalceanu
 
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsPotential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsRavi Sanghani
 
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data IntegrationBridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integrationmarketing932765
 
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...Nikki Chapple
 
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesHow to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesThousandEyes
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to Hero
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to HeroUiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to Hero
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to HeroUiPathCommunity
 
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructure
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical InfrastructureVarsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructure
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructureitnewsafrica
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...BookNet Canada
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeA Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeCprime
 
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Compliance Requirements i...
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks  and Compliance Requirements i...Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks  and Compliance Requirements i...
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Compliance Requirements i...itnewsafrica
 
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...Wes McKinney
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdf
Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdfLandscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdf
Landscape Catalogue 2024 Australia-1.pdf
 
Data governance with Unity Catalog Presentation
Data governance with Unity Catalog PresentationData governance with Unity Catalog Presentation
Data governance with Unity Catalog Presentation
 
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...
Unleashing Real-time Insights with ClickHouse_ Navigating the Landscape in 20...
 
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
Tampa BSides - The No BS SOC (slides from April 6, 2024 talk)
 
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App FrameworkReact Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
React Native vs Ionic - The Best Mobile App Framework
 
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platformsInfrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
Infrared simulation and processing on Nvidia platforms
 
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
 
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance ToolboxA Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
A Glance At The Java Performance Toolbox
 
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and InsightsPotential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
Potential of AI (Generative AI) in Business: Learnings and Insights
 
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data IntegrationBridging Between CAD & GIS:  6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
Bridging Between CAD & GIS: 6 Ways to Automate Your Data Integration
 
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...
Microsoft 365 Copilot: How to boost your productivity with AI – Part one: Ado...
 
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyesHow to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
How to Effectively Monitor SD-WAN and SASE Environments with ThousandEyes
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to Hero
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to HeroUiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to Hero
UiPath Community: Communication Mining from Zero to Hero
 
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructure
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical InfrastructureVarsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructure
Varsha Sewlal- Cyber Attacks on Critical Critical Infrastructure
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC SalesData and LibraryData -...
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeA Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
 
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Compliance Requirements i...
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks  and Compliance Requirements i...Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks  and Compliance Requirements i...
Abdul Kader Baba- Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Compliance Requirements i...
 
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...
The Future Roadmap for the Composable Data Stack - Wes McKinney - Data Counci...
 

MDOP

  • 1. Microsoft MDOP delivers a three-year ROI of 532% with a payback period of 4.6 months. Benefits include:  Automating processes and providing management and visibility and quicker resolution to PC problems increased IT staff productivity, reducing the costs to support PCs by $194 per PC per year.  End-user productivity loss from downtime, calls to the help desk, and self-troubleshooting was reduced by 63%, restoring to each user eight hours of 100% productive time and saving $290 per PC per year.  Other cost savings, including the reduction in spending on third- party software solutions and better management of IT resources, totaled $23 per PC per year. Business Value Highlights title W H I T E P AP E R D e s k t o p O p t i m i z a t i o n U s i n g M D O P : C o n t i n u e d I n v e s t m e n t L e a d s t o B e t t e r V a l u e Sponsored by: Microsoft Corp. Al Gillen Randy Perry Nancy Selig May 2013 E X E C U T I V E S U M M AR Y A well-managed environment consistently outperforms an inconsistent or poorly managed environment, and a well-managed environment will result in better uptime, lower cost of management, and fewer help desk calls. Fewer problems lead to happier — and more productive — end users. IDC research finds that companies investing in tools that allow a PC environment to be better managed and kept more secure and well prepared for a recovery — should it become necessary — have lower operational costs and can experience a significant return on investment (ROI) associated with their management tools. Such is the case when using the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP), a primarily client-side management suite that offers six discrete solutions to help personalize the user experience, simplify application deployment, and improve application compatibility with the Windows operating system. In addition, MDOP includes products that help manage, monitor, and deploy key Windows features such as BitLocker and Group Policy. Using MDOP shifts desktop repair from reactive to proactive, saving time and removing challenges associated with troubleshooting and repairing system failures. IDC found that a PC that uses all six MDOP solutions can realize annual IT productivity savings as high as $194 per year per managed PC, or a 36% reduction in annual cost, compared with a PC that is not using the MDOP suite. In addition, end users see a productivity gain, with a cost savings associated with improved user productivity calculated at an additional $290 per PC per year. Together with savings realized by the elimination of third-party software, hardware, and additional software licensing costs, operational cost savings can reach a combined total of up to $508 per PC per year. GlobalHeadquarters:5SpeenStreetFramingham,MA01701USAP.508.872.8200F.508.935.4015www.idc.com
  • 2. 2 #241034 ©2013 IDC These cost savings and benefits are broken out into the following key areas:  Cost savings associated with improved IT productivity and efficiency. This may include the benefit of accelerating routine tasks such as rolling out new PCs, operating systems, or applications and recovering failed systems. It also can include the reduction in recovery/repair activities due to more stable and reliable PC configurations. By automating processes and providing management and visibility and quicker resolution to PC problems, companies in this study were able to reduce the IT labor costs associated with PC deployment and annual support of PC operations, including help desk operations, by $194 per PC per year.  Cost savings associated with improved end-user productivity. MDOP enhances end-user productivity by reducing the time users lose to problems with PC operations. End users experience less downtime, or when there is a system failure, they are able to recover and restore operations more quickly. This study found that downtime and help desk issues and instances of user self-troubleshooting were significantly reduced, restoring eight hours of 100% productivity to each end user and saving $290 per PC per year.  Other cost savings, including the reduction in spending on third-party software solutions previously used by companies in this study. Better management of IT resources also led to reductions in the costs associated with hardware, software licensing, and deployment management support, which enabled companies to reduce third-party support. Savings in this area totaled $23 per PC per year.  The cost reductions found by IDC's analysis led to a strong ROI story. On average, companies experienced discounted benefits of $1,220 per PC over a three-year period at a total discounted investment of $195 per PC. The investment yields an ROI of 532% over three years. Companies included in this study on average were able to pay back their initial investment in 4.6 months, making a strong justification for acquiring and deploying MDOP. Summarizing the findings, IDC found a substantial and quickly recognizable payback associated with using the MDOP suite, particularly for organizations that embrace the technology and use at least several components included in MDOP. The study found that the greater the number of MDOP components that an individual customer deployed, the greater the overall benefit the customer experienced. The only consideration for customers is that gaining access to MDOP requires a Volume License contract with Windows Client Software Assurance (SA) because MDOP can be purchased only by SA customers. But given that prerequisite, the relatively low acquisition cost of MDOP (a list price of $10 per PC per year) ensures substantial benefit from the incremental investment.
  • 3. ©2013 IDC #241034 3 I N T H I S W H I T E P AP E R This IDC White Paper considers the operational experiences of customer sites that are using the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack to manage and maintain their PCs and calculates a total cost of ownership (TCO) and ROI model associated with using these products. M E T H O D O L O G Y IDC identified, screened, and qualified multiple end-user organizations and used the experiences of these organizations as a representative model of the effect of acquiring and deploying MDOP. As part of this work, IDC conducted a series of interviews with these companies about their use of MDOP and carefully probed customers about their experience with components within the MDOP suite that they are using. This analysis involved capturing the operational characteristics of their environment, including frequency of end-user problems, outages, help desk calls, and time spent by IT professionals to support PCs within the organization, both before and after their deployment of the MDOP suite. This information is used to create a before and after model for these organizations depicting their operational costs and how those costs are affected by the use of one or multiple components of MDOP. This data is used to calculate TCO and ROI. For more detail, please see the Appendix. S T U D Y D E M O G R AP H I C S The demographics for the organizations IDC interviewed are illustrated in Table 1. Median values for these organizations include 4,250 employees, 65 IT employees, and 3,875 PCs. The PC count being lower than the number of employees implies that these organizations are in a business vertical where there is some PC sharing or shift scheduled that does not mandate one PC per employee. This global study included interviews with organizations in Europe, Asia/Pacific, and the United States. Being progressive organizations that carry Software Assurance on their PCs, it comes as little surprise that there is comparatively less Windows XP installed at these organizations than would be found industrywide because SA increases the potential for and lowers the expense of migrating to the newest version of Windows. Windows 7 penetration is about where we would expect to see it, but Windows 8 adoption is far beyond what we see industrywide. IDC notes that the Windows 8 penetration rate was elevated studywide by one organization that had largely migrated its entire PC installed base to the most current Windows product (see Table 1).
  • 4. 4 #241034 ©2013 IDC T A B L E 1 I n t e r v i e w C o m p a n y D e m o g r a p h i c s Employees (median) 4,250 IT staff (median) 65 PCs (median) 3,875 % of PCs by operating system Windows XP 22 Windows 7 48 Windows 8 21 Other (non-Windows) 9 % of PCs covered by MDOP 100 Average MDOP products in use per organization 3.4 Source: IDC, 2013 S I T U AT I O N O V E R V I E W The Windows desktop environment is entering a period of significant change, brought on in part by the introduction of Windows 7 and Windows 8 in a relatively short period of time. Further complicating things for IT professionals is the bring-your-own-device (BYOD) trend that is altering how users and IT departments interact now and in the future. Never before has IT faced a more complicated and faster-changing challenge. If ever there was a need for sophisticated and efficient tools to manage this changing IT environment, it is now. At the same time, these changing times create an ideal inflection point to move to smarter management tools that reduce the burden on IT posed by routine maintenance and support issues. The opportunities exist to improve application delivery, extend user state virtualization, and protect data on PCs even if the device should end up in the wrong hands. Desktop virtualization technologies are another dimension that not only improves the usability of existing PCs but also can help extend the application experience to BYOD users. IDC research indicates that organizations that combine a greater emphasis on a consistent and standardized software stack on their PCs generally enjoy lower long- term operational cost thanks to that more consistent environment. The key to deploying — and maintaining — consistency is the use of management tools that make it practical to empower employees to be productive with their PCs but at the same time prevent systems from individually diverging significantly from the standard build of the corporate software environment.
  • 5. ©2013 IDC #241034 5 W h a t I s I n c l u d e d i n M D O P ? The MDOP suite can be grouped into three broad functional areas: tools that help solve compatibility issues and make deployment easier through virtualization technology, tools that generally enhance IT management and security and boost IT and user productivity, and tools that speed PC recovery or proactively boost user productivity.  Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V). Using App-V, customers can stream an application to individual desktops on an as-needed basis, with those applications deploying in a virtualized environment aboard the PC, insulated from other applications.  Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V). This relatively new component of MDOP incorporates some concepts that historically were associated with Windows but were not previously widely used by customers. The UE-V product enables user state virtualization, making it possible to deliver a user's personal Windows experience across multiple devices. This includes delivery of a consistent look and feel regardless of how Windows and applications are deployed. UE-V makes it possible to use multiple Windows 7 and Windows 8 devices and gain a consistent experience with each instance.  Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM). This technology makes administration of BitLocker implementations simpler and more practical for enterprise-level deployments. MBAM simplifies deployment and key recovery, centralizes compliance reporting and enforcement, and can lower administration costs associated with provisioning and supporting encrypted drives within an organization.  Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGPM). Most customers running a Windows server infrastructure also use Active Directory and Group Policy Objects (GPOs) to manage the configuration and use rights on PCs. AGPM empowers IT staff to review and modify GPOs without affecting employee desktops and allows for greater control over how edits are made and applied, resulting in a much richer level of PC manageability.  Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT). The DaRT product is a set of 14 individual tools that help diagnose and repair a PC that has failed — even if it won't boot into safe mode — remove malicious code, or recover deleted files.  Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V). This product is used to support applications that are incompatible with Windows 7 by continuing to run the applications within a Windows XP virtual workspace on a Windows 7 machine. During the in-depth interviews that took place with customers, IDC captured information about which elements of the MDOP suite customers were using. Figure 1 highlights the usage of individual MDOP products on the PCs in use at customers interviewed for this analysis.
  • 6. 6 #241034 ©2013 IDC As depicted in Figure 1, the most commonly used solution was App-V, followed closely by UE-V. App-V usage is higher in this study compared with a previous IDC study, and it appears that this product has become the single most attractive solution for customers. Another relatively new addition to the MDOP suite, MBAM is the third most widely used product at 63% of PCs. The least used of the MDOP products on the PCs in use within the survey sample is MED-V. Among mainstream end-user employees, MED-V is likely to see decreasing use as customers get further away from a hybrid Windows XP and Windows 7/Windows 8 mix of products. F I G U R E 1 C u s t o m e r U s e o f I n d i v i d u a l M D O P P r o d u c t s Source: IDC, 2013 B U S I N E S S V AL U E O F M D O P IDC research takes a broader look at ROI and TCO and describes these metrics using the concept of "business value." Business value is an expansion of the basic value proposition offered by the acquisition and deployment of a product and extends that view to include the benefits realized by end users through better uptime and productivity, the avoidance of server downtime, and the resulting improved business agility that allows companies to deploy applications faster and more reliably. With our research around the use of MDOP suite products, we use a business value metric to measure the annual TCO and ROI benefits associated with PCs that use MDOP compared with PCs managed without the benefit of MDOP. 13 50 50 63 75 88 0 20 40 60 80 100 Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V) Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT) Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGPM) Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM) Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V) Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) (% of Windows PCs)
  • 7. ©2013 IDC #241034 7 Table 2 presents the cost reductions associated with the deployment of MDOP. Overall, cost reductions associated with IT productivity, when combined with end-user productivity gains and other cost savings, based on the presumed use of all six products included in MDOP, can lead to an average annual benefit of up to $508 per PC. Use of fewer than all six MDOP products will lead to a lower overall cost benefit. This $508 benefit is composed of the following contributions:  IT productivity. This includes routine tasks such as rolling out new PCs, operating systems, or applications and recovering failed systems. It also can include the reduction in recovery/repair activities due to more stable and reliable PC configurations. MDOP use leads to savings of up to $194 per PC per year, or roughly four hours per PC per year.  End-user productivity. End users experience less downtime and fewer other PC issues that impact operations. When there is a problem, IT can recover and restore operations more quickly. MDOP use leads to savings of up to $290 per PC per year. This line item accounted for over half, or 57%, of the total cost savings that is attributable to MDOP.  Other cost savings. This includes the reduction in spending on third-party software solutions and reductions in hardware costs and software licensing and deployment that enable companies to reduce third-party support. MDOP use leads to savings of up to $23 per PC per year. T A B L E 2 A n n u a l B e n e f i t s o f U s i n g M D O P Cost Savings per PC per Year ($) % of Total IT productivity 194 38 End-user productivity 290 57 Other cost savings 23 5 Total 508 Source: IDC, 2013
  • 8. 8 #241034 ©2013 IDC T h e I m p a c t o n I T P r o d u c t i v i t y As depicted in Table 3, the $194 in annual productivity savings per PC for IT staff is a composite of cost savings in several common IT activity areas: annual management, PC deployment, help desk, and downtime (and subsequent recovery).  PC deployment costs — IT staff time associated with new PC deployments such as staging and logistics, installing PC operating system images, installing or provisioning applications on new PCs, configuring disk encryption and other security measures to ensure long-term protection of corporate assets, and supporting PCs immediately after deployment  Annual management costs — Ongoing PC management, including provisioning and/or installing additional new applications, updating/replacing existing applications, ensuring content is secure on laptops that may be lost or stolen  Help desk costs — IT staff time to answer calls to the help desk and resolve PC issues such as software compatibility, access, and updates  Downtime costs — IT staff time to respond to and resolve hardware and operating system failures and other system outages As noted in Table 3, the biggest change on a percentage basis came from help desk cost reductions (65%) and downtime cost reductions (76%). However, in terms of absolute dollars, the more significant reduction was associated with annual management costs, which contracted by $106 per PC per year, compared with PCs not using MDOP solutions. T A B L E 3 I T P r o d u c t i v i t y C o s t S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r A t t r i b u t e d t o M D O P Before ($) After ($) Savings ($) % Change Annual management 356 250 106 30 PC deployment 94 69 25 26 Help desk 74 26 48 65 Downtime 19 5 15 76 Total 543 349 194 36 Source: IDC, 2013
  • 9. ©2013 IDC #241034 9 U n d e r s t a n d i n g U s e r P r o d u c t i v i t y Table 4 shows user productivity cost savings in the following areas:  Help desk: Productivity loss associated with end users waiting on or working with help desk personnel to resolve a PC issue  Downtime: Productivity loss associated with downtime when a PC is not available for use due to planned or unplanned downtime  Self-service: Productivity loss associated with end users working to solve PC problems themselves (This could include searching for resolution to problems or time spent waiting for reboots or patch installation to complete in an effort to resolve a problem the user faces.) As depicted in Table 4, the $290 in annual productivity savings per PC per year for end users is a composite of four areas. The single largest cost savings area, in terms of both absolute dollars and percent change, is the reduction in time spent waiting for help desk support. The cost savings is $140, or nearly half of the $290 total cost savings. This area realized an 85% reduction in costs, which dropped from $165 per PC per year to $25 per PC per year. The next most significant savings came from the dramatic reduction in time spent with self-service support. On average, MDOP is saving each PC user nearly 16 hours per year. Unlike downtime, which is a total loss in productivity, self-service activities result in less than 20% loss. The use of MDOP dropped loss from self-service troubleshooting from $190 to $79 per PC per year, a 59% reduction. T A B L E 4 U s e r P r o d u c t i v i t y C o s t S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r A t t r i b u t e d t o M D O P Before ($) After ($) Savings ($) % Change Help desk 165 25 140 85 Downtime 49 10 39 80 Self-service 190 79 112 59 Total 404 113 290 72 Source: IDC, 2013
  • 10. 10 #241034 ©2013 IDC B r e a k i n g D o w n M D O P S a v i n g s b y P r o d u c t MDOP products are available only as a suite — that is, individual products are not available on a standalone basis. However, typically customers do not use every product in the MDOP suite. Indeed, the customers in this study used, on average, 3.4 of the 6 products included in MDOP. Given that the incremental cost to add MDOP to an existing Volume License agreement with Windows Client Software Assurance is only $10 per PC per year, the use of a single MDOP product can more than offset that incremental cost, and the use of 3.4 MDOP products indicates a strong value proposition. Use of MDOP products is likely to be more closely related to broader corporate initiatives to manage operational expenses rather than the exact savings associated with each individual product. Nevertheless, Table 5 breaks out the cost savings per PC per year for each of the six MDOP products. As noted in Table 5, the largest contributors to cost savings were MBAM, with a $58 cost savings, or 30% of the overall $194 cost savings total, followed by App-V, at 26% of the overall total, or $50 in cost savings. Other contributors to cost savings were DaRT, at 19% of the total cost savings, and UE-V, at 16% of the overall cost savings. T A B L E 5 M D O P P r o d u c t - R e l a t e d I T S t a f f L a b o r S a v i n g s p e r P C p e r Y e a r Value ($) % of Total Hours Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) 50 26 1.2 Microsoft User Experience Virtualization (UE-V) 30 16 0.70 Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM) 58 30 1.3 Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGPM) 9 5 0.21 Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT) 37 19 0.87 Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V) 10 5 0.22 Total 194 4.5 Source: IDC, 2013
  • 11. ©2013 IDC #241034 11 C o s t t o D e p l o y a n d U s e M D O P When it comes to reducing costs related to IT, rarely is there a free ride. To recognize a return on an investment, an organization must first make an investment. Initial costs include the server hardware and software needed to support the MDOP applications; the IT labor required to install the servers and deploy MDOP; and training for IT to use MDOP, which includes any training services and the cost of the time IT staff spend in training. Annual costs include IT labor to support the MDOP applications and the servers and the annual license fees for Windows Client Software Assurance and MDOP. Table 6 captures this specific metric and introduces the costs that organizations interviewed in this study experienced to deploy and use MDOP. The acquisition, deployment, and operational costs identified in Table 6 are amortized over a three-year period. These costs are used as one of the baseline values for the ROI calculations made in this analysis. IDC notes that while MDOP costs $10 per PC per year, the requirement of having SA in place adds an additional $55 per PC per year, which leads to higher overall acquisition costs for organizations that do not currently have SA in place. Customers tend to not see MDOP on the basis of its standalone cost; rather, they see it as a component of a much larger investment (including SA), as indicated in Table 6. In reality, SA is not simply an MDOP prerequisite; it is a separate product that offers a value proposition that includes upgrade rights to the latest Windows client operating system version as well as a variety of training, support, and additional use rights that go beyond the standard licensing terms. T A B L E 6 T h r e e - Y e a r I n v e s t m e n t A s s o c i a t e d w i t h D e p l o y i n g a n d U s i n g M D O P ( $ ) Hardware 11 IT labor install 2 Training 15 Cost per seat for MDOP 195 Ongoing FTE 1 Total 224 Source: IDC, 2013
  • 12. 12 #241034 ©2013 IDC R O I AN AL Y S I S IDC uses the net present value (NPV) of the savings and increased revenue over three years in calculating the ROI and payback period for the deployment. The NPV of the savings is determined by subtracting the amount that would have been earned by investing the original sum in an instrument yielding a 12% return (to allow for the missed opportunity cost that could have been realized using that capital). This accounts for both the assumed cost of money and the assumed rate of return. The ROI analysis is shown in Table 7. T A B L E 7 T h r e e - Y e a r R O I A n a l y s i s p e r P C Benefit (discounted) $1,220 Investment (discounted) $195 Net present value $1,025 ROI = NPV/investment 532% Payback 4.6 months Discount factor 12% Source: IDC, 2013 On average, companies identified discounted benefits of $1,220 per PC for a three- year period at a total discounted investment of $195 per PC. The investment yields a return of 532% over three years. Companies included in this study on average were able to pay back their initial investment in 4.6 months. F U T U R E O U T L O O K Given the significant change sweeping over the industry today, the time has never been better to establish a secure and responsible approach to deployment and management of PCs. Microsoft has long encouraged customers to incorporate stronger PC configuration and management processes into their environments; deploying MDOP is one effective way to help reach that objective. Unfortunately, not all customers can rationalize the benefit of an investment in management, and some customers, particularly smaller businesses, tend to use few management tools — sometimes none at all. IDC expects that the difficulty of client management will continue to decline over time, offset by new challenges caused by BYOD trends.
  • 13. ©2013 IDC #241034 13 C H AL L E N G E S / O P P O R T U N I T I E S Every product solution has a market segment where it has a best fit and yet may be challenged to be equally successful in other market segments. MDOP is no different. It has significant strength among large enterprise customers, but it is not nearly so successful among small and medium-sized businesses.  Challenge: Not all customers have SA. The most common way for customers to gain access to purchase MDOP from Microsoft is to have a Volume License agreement with Windows Client Software Assurance. However, there are several other ways to indirectly gain access to MDOP, specifically for customers that acquire Microsoft Virtual Desktop Access (VDA) licenses or have a subscription to Windows Intune. Without one of these relationships in place, customers cannot acquire MDOP today. This means that for customers that do not have or do not plan to acquire a Volume License or VDA seats, MDOP is not a viable solution simply because it is not available.  Opportunity: MDOP is still relevant for virtualized client deployments. Virtual client computing does not relieve an IT department from treating the virtual client instances as full Windows desktops, and much of the functionality included in MDOP applies to virtual clients just as it does to physical clients. A customer that chooses to use a Microsoft competitor as its primary client virtualization supplier still can benefit from the other five products included in the MDOP suite, as those products remain relevant and valuable even if a customer opts to not use MED-V. C O N C L U S I O N A well-managed environment will consistently outperform an environment that has less sophistication, less consistency, or less lockdown — in terms of uptime, cost of management, help desk calls, and a variety of other metrics. Advanced management tools, when applied and used properly, offer a return on the investment required to deploy them that exceeds the original deployment cost over a period of three years. IDC found that a PC that uses all six MDOP solutions can realize annual IT productivity savings as high as $194 per year, or a 36% reduction in annual cost, compared with a PC that is not using the MDOP suite. Further, end users see a productivity gain as well, with a cost savings associated with improved user productivity calculated at an additional $290 per PC per year. Full cost savings, including other miscellaneous costs that result from the use of MDOP, can reach $508 per PC per year. IDC found a substantial and quickly recognizable payback associated with using the MDOP suite for organizations that embrace the technology and use at least several components of the suite. As organizations continue transitioning to Windows 7 and Windows 8, the timing could not be better to adopt a consistent PC deployment and management approach. MDOP can be an effective tool to reach that goal.
  • 14. 14 #241034 ©2013 IDC AP P E N D I X IDC utilized its standard ROI methodology for this project. This methodology is based on gathering data from current users of the technology as the foundation for the model. As part of this study, IDC identified, screened, and qualified eight end-user organizations and constructed a study group to be used as a representative sample of the industry. As part of this work, IDC conducted a series of interviews with these companies about their use of MDOP and carefully probed customers about their experience with components within the MDOP suite that they are using. This analysis involved capturing the operational characteristics of their environment, including frequency of end-user problems, outages, help desk calls, and time spent by IT professionals to support PCs within the organization, both before and after their deployment of the MDOP suite. Based on these interviews, IDC performs a three-step process to calculate the ROI and payback period: 1. Measure the savings from reduced IT costs (staff, hardware, software, maintenance, and IT support), increased user productivity, and improved revenue over the term of the deployment. 2. Ascertain the investment made in deploying the solution and the associated training and support costs. 3. Project the costs and savings over a three-year period and calculate the ROI and payback for the deployed solution. IDC uses the NPV of the savings and increased revenue over three years in calculating the ROI and payback period for the deployment. The NPV of the savings is determined by subtracting the amount that would have been earned by investing the original sum in an instrument yielding a 12% return (to allow for the missed opportunity cost that could have been realized using that capital). IDC bases the payback period and ROI calculations on a number of assumptions, which are summarized as follows: 1. Time values are multiplied by burdened salary (salary + 28% for benefits and overhead) to quantify efficiency and manager productivity savings. 2. Downtime values are a product of the number of hours of downtime multiplied by the number of users affected. 3. The impact of unplanned downtime is quantified in terms of impaired end-user productivity and lost revenue. 4. Lost productivity is a product of downtime multiplied by burdened salary. 5. Lost revenue is a product of downtime multiplied by the average revenue generated per hour.
  • 15. ©2013 IDC #241034 15 6. The NPV of the three-year savings is calculated by subtracting the amount that would have been realized by investing the original sum in an instrument yielding a 12% return to allow for the missed opportunity cost. This accounts for both the assumed cost of money and the assumed rate of return. Because every hour of downtime does not equate to a lost hour of productivity or revenue generation, IDC attributes only a fraction of the result to savings. As part of our assessment, we asked each company what fraction of downtime hours to use in calculating productivity savings and the reduction in lost revenue. IDC then taxes the revenue at that rate. Further, because IT solutions require a deployment period, the full benefits of the solution are not available during deployment. To capture this reality, IDC prorates the benefits on a monthly basis and then subtracts the deployment time from the first- year savings. Note: All numbers in this document may not be exact due to rounding. C o p y r i g h t N o t i c e External Publication of IDC Information and Data — Any IDC information that is to be used in advertising, press releases, or promotional materials requires prior written approval from the appropriate IDC Vice President or Country Manager. A draft of the proposed document should accompany any such request. IDC reserves the right to deny approval of external usage for any reason. Copyright 2013 IDC. Reproduction without written permission is completely forbidden.