SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Planned contract duration reported in Qualifying Defence Contracts 2015/16
1
Defence suppliers are required by Regulation 22 of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014
to submit reports to the Single Source Regulations Office about qualifying defence contracts
(QDCs) and qualifying sub-contracts (QSCs). The types of contract reports and the data to be
provided in each are prescribed in Part 5 of the Regulations.
This report provides an analysis of the planned contract duration reported in the contract pricing
statements for 34 QDCs/QSCs entered into within the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. Data
presented is as submitted by the suppliers. All figures are provisional, and may be updated in
future statistical releases.
The planned contract duration figures reported are those agreed at contract signing, and may not
reflect the actual length of contracts. The SSRO will also publish statistics on the actual length of
contracts, once this data has been collected following contract completion.
Key points
•	 The vast majority of QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16, 31 out of 34 (91 per cent), have a planned
contract duration of less than or equal to five years.
•	 Half of the QDCs/QSCs, 17 out of 34, have a planned contract duration of between four years
and five years.
•	 The shortest planned contract duration is 1.8 years and the longest planned contract duration
is 25.3 years.
Figure 1 shows the planned contract duration of all 34 QDCs in 2015/16. Fourteen contracts have
a planned contract duration of up to and including four years. Only three contracts have a planned
contract duration of over five years.
Figure 1: Planned contract duration of QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16
Planned contract duration reported
in Qualifying Defence Contracts
2015/16
5 July 2016
Note: The contract duration bands have been constructed so that a QDC/QSC that is exactly three years
long would fall within the ‘2-3 years’ category, as an example.
3
4
7
17
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 - 2 years 2 - 3 years 3 - 4 years 4 - 5 years >5 years
Frequency
Planned contract duration
Planned contract duration reported in Qualifying Defence Contracts 2015/16
2
Data sources and methodology
The data in this report is sourced from the contract pricing statements, which suppliers are required
to submit to the SSRO within one month of the initial reporting date for a contract (usually the date
the contract is entered into, unless it becomes a QDC/QSC by amendment). It is also derived from
the quarterly contract reports, which are required for QDCs/QSCs with a contract value over £50
million within one month of the end of each calendar quarter. The templates and user guides for
both of these reports are available on the SSRO’s website1
. Data from these reports are collated in
the Defence Contract Analysis and Reporting System (DefCARS).
Only QDCs/QSCs which reported a time of agreement before 1 April 2016 have been included in
this release, as notified to the SSRO by the Ministry of Defence, separate to the submitted contract
pricing statement reports.
Planned contract duration has been determined by calculating the number of days between the
planned contract start date and planned contract end date.
Due to the commercial sensitivity of this data, the SSRO does not release any information that
will enable identification of individual contracts or suppliers included within the analysis. For
more information on the SSRO’s handling of commercially sensitive information, see the SSRO’s
statement on its website2
.
Further information
The SSRO welcomes any queries or feedback you may have on this statistical release.
If you would like to get in touch, please email us at helpdesk@ssro.gov.uk.
1	 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/01-user-guide-for-contract-pricing-statement
2	 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/handling-commercially-sensitive-information
Note: The longest contract commenced several years before the period under review in this bulletin, but it
became a QDC during this year.
Mean = 4.7
Median = 4.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
Figure 2 shows the range in contract duration for individual QDCs/QSCs. The median and mean
average planned contract duration is 4.3 years and 4.7 years respectively.
Figure 2: Planned contract duration reported in individual QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16
30
Plannedcontractduration(years)
QDCs/QSCs

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (6)

How to pull widget code from your account
How to pull widget code from your accountHow to pull widget code from your account
How to pull widget code from your account
 
Trastornos específicos del aprendizaje.
Trastornos específicos del aprendizaje.Trastornos específicos del aprendizaje.
Trastornos específicos del aprendizaje.
 
Tiberio Bentivoglio
Tiberio BentivoglioTiberio Bentivoglio
Tiberio Bentivoglio
 
Marketting Excellence by American express
 Marketting Excellence by American express  Marketting Excellence by American express
Marketting Excellence by American express
 
Concept architectural
Concept architecturalConcept architectural
Concept architectural
 
Cultural diversity
Cultural diversityCultural diversity
Cultural diversity
 

Similar to Planned_contract_duration_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web

Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_Web
Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_WebEngineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_Web
Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_WebMatthew Rees
 
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_webProfit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_webMatthew Rees
 
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_final
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_finalCapital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_final
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_finalMatthew Rees
 
State Board policy on contracts
State Board policy on contractsState Board policy on contracts
State Board policy on contractsEducationNC
 
Technology Products RM1054 Customer Guidance
Technology Products RM1054 Customer GuidanceTechnology Products RM1054 Customer Guidance
Technology Products RM1054 Customer GuidanceBen Morrison
 
Framework Days
Framework DaysFramework Days
Framework Daysvindma
 
Handbook on works contract management
Handbook on works contract managementHandbook on works contract management
Handbook on works contract managementSrinivasaRao Guduru
 
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazil
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazilIFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazil
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazilMauricio Portugal Ribeiro
 
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
 
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08Martin Ellis
 
APA Rollback Expert Column
APA Rollback Expert ColumnAPA Rollback Expert Column
APA Rollback Expert ColumnShuchi Ray
 
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16Matthew Rees
 
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on Telcos
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on TelcosASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on Telcos
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on TelcosHARIT MANKAD
 
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission Projects
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission ProjectsTariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission Projects
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission ProjectsAmitava Nag
 

Similar to Planned_contract_duration_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web (20)

Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_Web
Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_WebEngineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_Web
Engineering_labour_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_-_Web
 
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_webProfit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web
Profit_rates_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web
 
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_final
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_finalCapital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_final
Capital_servicing_adjustments_in_qualifying_defence_contracts_October_2016_final
 
State Board policy on contracts
State Board policy on contractsState Board policy on contracts
State Board policy on contracts
 
Technology Products RM1054 Customer Guidance
Technology Products RM1054 Customer GuidanceTechnology Products RM1054 Customer Guidance
Technology Products RM1054 Customer Guidance
 
Framework Days
Framework DaysFramework Days
Framework Days
 
Handbook on works contract management
Handbook on works contract managementHandbook on works contract management
Handbook on works contract management
 
TBCB_29032019.pptx
TBCB_29032019.pptxTBCB_29032019.pptx
TBCB_29032019.pptx
 
Potential next steps for developers if URD 14D/114 is passed
Potential next steps for developers if URD 14D/114 is passedPotential next steps for developers if URD 14D/114 is passed
Potential next steps for developers if URD 14D/114 is passed
 
Transforming rehabilitation
Transforming rehabilitationTransforming rehabilitation
Transforming rehabilitation
 
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazil
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazilIFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazil
IFC contributions to road concessions best practices in brazil
 
Let's pick a TE&A news
Let's pick a TE&A newsLet's pick a TE&A news
Let's pick a TE&A news
 
Public matters march 2016
Public matters   march 2016Public matters   march 2016
Public matters march 2016
 
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation
Teekay LNG Partners Q3-2016 Earnings Presentation
 
Best practices on PPPs contracts
Best practices on PPPs contracts  Best practices on PPPs contracts
Best practices on PPPs contracts
 
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08
Ogc guidance on_framework_agreements_sept_08
 
APA Rollback Expert Column
APA Rollback Expert ColumnAPA Rollback Expert Column
APA Rollback Expert Column
 
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16
International_aspects_of_qualifying_defence_contracts_2015_16
 
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on Telcos
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on TelcosASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on Telcos
ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT OF IND AS on Telcos
 
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission Projects
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission ProjectsTariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission Projects
Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) for Intra-State Transmission Projects
 

More from Matthew Rees

Companies-in-Government
Companies-in-GovernmentCompanies-in-Government
Companies-in-GovernmentMatthew Rees
 
The-sale-of-Eurostar
The-sale-of-EurostarThe-sale-of-Eurostar
The-sale-of-EurostarMatthew Rees
 
Financial-institutions-landscape
Financial-institutions-landscapeFinancial-institutions-landscape
Financial-institutions-landscapeMatthew Rees
 
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homesMatthew Rees
 
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investment
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investmentThe-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investment
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investmentMatthew Rees
 
The-privatisation-of-royal-mail
The-privatisation-of-royal-mailThe-privatisation-of-royal-mail
The-privatisation-of-royal-mailMatthew Rees
 
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructureUK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructureMatthew Rees
 

More from Matthew Rees (7)

Companies-in-Government
Companies-in-GovernmentCompanies-in-Government
Companies-in-Government
 
The-sale-of-Eurostar
The-sale-of-EurostarThe-sale-of-Eurostar
The-sale-of-Eurostar
 
Financial-institutions-landscape
Financial-institutions-landscapeFinancial-institutions-landscape
Financial-institutions-landscape
 
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes
150624 Disposal-of-public-land-for-new-homes
 
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investment
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investmentThe-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investment
The-choice-of-finance-for-capital-investment
 
The-privatisation-of-royal-mail
The-privatisation-of-royal-mailThe-privatisation-of-royal-mail
The-privatisation-of-royal-mail
 
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructureUK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure
UK-Guarantees-scheme-for-infrastructure
 

Planned_contract_duration_reported_in_Qualifying_Defence_Contracts_2015-16_final_for_web

  • 1. Planned contract duration reported in Qualifying Defence Contracts 2015/16 1 Defence suppliers are required by Regulation 22 of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014 to submit reports to the Single Source Regulations Office about qualifying defence contracts (QDCs) and qualifying sub-contracts (QSCs). The types of contract reports and the data to be provided in each are prescribed in Part 5 of the Regulations. This report provides an analysis of the planned contract duration reported in the contract pricing statements for 34 QDCs/QSCs entered into within the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. Data presented is as submitted by the suppliers. All figures are provisional, and may be updated in future statistical releases. The planned contract duration figures reported are those agreed at contract signing, and may not reflect the actual length of contracts. The SSRO will also publish statistics on the actual length of contracts, once this data has been collected following contract completion. Key points • The vast majority of QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16, 31 out of 34 (91 per cent), have a planned contract duration of less than or equal to five years. • Half of the QDCs/QSCs, 17 out of 34, have a planned contract duration of between four years and five years. • The shortest planned contract duration is 1.8 years and the longest planned contract duration is 25.3 years. Figure 1 shows the planned contract duration of all 34 QDCs in 2015/16. Fourteen contracts have a planned contract duration of up to and including four years. Only three contracts have a planned contract duration of over five years. Figure 1: Planned contract duration of QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16 Planned contract duration reported in Qualifying Defence Contracts 2015/16 5 July 2016 Note: The contract duration bands have been constructed so that a QDC/QSC that is exactly three years long would fall within the ‘2-3 years’ category, as an example. 3 4 7 17 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1 - 2 years 2 - 3 years 3 - 4 years 4 - 5 years >5 years Frequency Planned contract duration
  • 2. Planned contract duration reported in Qualifying Defence Contracts 2015/16 2 Data sources and methodology The data in this report is sourced from the contract pricing statements, which suppliers are required to submit to the SSRO within one month of the initial reporting date for a contract (usually the date the contract is entered into, unless it becomes a QDC/QSC by amendment). It is also derived from the quarterly contract reports, which are required for QDCs/QSCs with a contract value over £50 million within one month of the end of each calendar quarter. The templates and user guides for both of these reports are available on the SSRO’s website1 . Data from these reports are collated in the Defence Contract Analysis and Reporting System (DefCARS). Only QDCs/QSCs which reported a time of agreement before 1 April 2016 have been included in this release, as notified to the SSRO by the Ministry of Defence, separate to the submitted contract pricing statement reports. Planned contract duration has been determined by calculating the number of days between the planned contract start date and planned contract end date. Due to the commercial sensitivity of this data, the SSRO does not release any information that will enable identification of individual contracts or suppliers included within the analysis. For more information on the SSRO’s handling of commercially sensitive information, see the SSRO’s statement on its website2 . Further information The SSRO welcomes any queries or feedback you may have on this statistical release. If you would like to get in touch, please email us at helpdesk@ssro.gov.uk. 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/01-user-guide-for-contract-pricing-statement 2 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/handling-commercially-sensitive-information Note: The longest contract commenced several years before the period under review in this bulletin, but it became a QDC during this year. Mean = 4.7 Median = 4.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 Figure 2 shows the range in contract duration for individual QDCs/QSCs. The median and mean average planned contract duration is 4.3 years and 4.7 years respectively. Figure 2: Planned contract duration reported in individual QDCs/QSCs in 2015/16 30 Plannedcontractduration(years) QDCs/QSCs