The Balanced Scorecard for Green Engineering Products in Ark Design is emulated with Push Funding for both Architecture and Portal Production, and KPI's and Econometrics for Scrum Deliverables... Creating the ARK NORM OF OPERATIONS... details of Scorecard Scrum in next paper
2. This is not a Prospectus as the Process
and Products are still in the Scientific
State of Invention. However the
Advanced Ark Staging Concept is
aligned with the Digital Build and
permits examination
in order to invite innovation in the
industrial arts and sciences.
Brij Consulting 8/22/2020 2
BALANCED SCORECARD
The Digital Build in Scorecard provides an Ark Product Emulation Stage to Examine Concepts
3. 8/22/2020 3
BALANCED SCORECARD
The idea that Gates need to be added comes from having multiple instances running in a dynamic build
The customer will want to see that
their projects are being funded and
supplied with internal resources
according to the agreed upon delivery
dates. Customers can be internal
Stakeholders to the process.
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
The Costing of an Agile Project from
our perspective should include the
story points that added difficulty that
will also assert added cost in
econometrics
LEARNING/GROWTH PERSPECTIVE
The Impact on Projects from Financial
Decisions are often demonstrated
through the key performance indicators
selected to represent the major
reporting elements that people effect.
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
The work done in Scrum or Kanban
processes to build Customer Projects
and respond to objectives of Internal
Management to create an effective
build environment.
INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
T&M
T&M Utilizing Time and
Motion Scripting
Brij Consulting
4. 8/22/2020 4
BALANCED SCORECARD
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
79% 83%
THE BL or Baseline Price is
lower, and it has a lower ROI
Using a Flat P Performance,
much of the cost is reserved
to move production to the
Balance Sheet.
1.24
1.05
0.83
1.38
1.04
0.79
1.61
1.03
0.83
Comparative Ratios
Break Even Funding
BL
BM
-
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
Break
Even
Funding
BL BM
implicit costs (reserves) 2,212.21 3,595.47 5,926.89
income per unit @P 6,952.80 6,952.80 6,952.80
fixed portion 1,032.33 3,523.44 4,331.08
variable portion 217.67 217.67 217.67
UnitPricew/P
Pricing Components Price
Components
THE BM or Benchmark Price is
higher, and it has a higher ROI
Using a Flat P Performance,
much of the cost is reserved to
move production to the Balance
Sheet.
Brij Consulting
BL BM BE PLAN Peak
Series1 14,289 17,428 10,415 18,856
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
UnitPrice
Product Lines Price
Yr1
5. 8/22/2020 5
BALANCED SCORECARD
STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE
Comparison of the Value of the
Funding from the Portfolio to the
Economic Activities of the Projects,
determining the Value Added by both
KPI’s assigned and Scrum Tasks by Role
Using Econometrics, the Scorecard is
assigning an Economic value to
Activities so that the change in the
Equity is evaluated, also can be
considered Net Funds when compared.
The Financials deliver a Portfolio with
Future Cash and Financial Conversion
that is broken down into metrics on the
Scorecard and reported as Project
Requirements, changing the timing of
events to the norm of the project.
Since it is necessary to report by
Product Line sub-reporting will be
added and the instances delineated by
the teams working on each product.
Funding impacts when production can
be capitalized as a ‘purchased’ asset.
•Cost vs
Benefit
Reports
•Activities
•Portfolio v
Scorecard
•Value
Added
KPI’s and
SCRUM Tasks
Financials
Report
builds from
Funding
Find from
Conversion
Analysis
Brij Consulting
6. Green Energy
Server
Green
Material
Infrastructure
Products
Land
Reclamation
Remote
Building
Virtual Glass
Sum of GNP 3,274,994,690,4 1,128,053,726,6 54,636,695,594. 4,609,659,079,5 743,370,274,355 19,045,203,054,
Sum of Demand Scale 11% 4% 0% 16% 3% 66%
Sum of % 0.448799976 0.469859672 0.081340352
Sum of Tertiary Demaind 12,950,535,090, 13,558,231,936, 2,347,150,493,8
Sum of Secondary Demand 9,632,629,406,1 3,317,905,684,3 160,701,036,303 13,558,231,936, 2,186,449,457,5
y = 460,044,145,305.8440x2 - 3,225,468,236,358.3000x + 10,387,102,614,848.7000
R² = 0.0407
0
2,000,000,000,000
4,000,000,000,000
6,000,000,000,000
8,000,000,000,000
10,000,000,000,000
12,000,000,000,000
14,000,000,000,000
16,000,000,000,000
18,000,000,000,000
20,000,000,000,000
Sum of GNP
Sum of Demand Scale
Sum of %
Sum of Tertiary Demaind
Sum of Secondary Demand
Poly. (Sum of Secondary Demand)
•Restoration
•Reclamation
Land
•Infrastructure
•Facing
Building
•Green Material
•Digital Control
Ark Multiple Convections
BALANCED SCORECARD PRODUCTS
Thruput
Portal Based Products are
divided into Customer or
Stakeholder Requirements
Substructure Products (not
shown) are divided into
Frame and supporting
Architecture Requirements
8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 6
7. BALANCED SCORECARD
The underlying tree structure is what corresponds to the project type and meta structure
8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 7
8. 4.48 payback
Portfolio Funds Purchase Date:
IF 6/26/22
BALANCED SCORECARD
Production
Specialist
8/22/2020
Brij Consulting
8
9.84 Scale
Both Architecture and Portal Products are
Funded through the Method of Push Funding
9. Purchase Date:
IF 6/26/22 Year 3
BALANCED SCORECARD
WAIT
8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 9
BE Funding Plan BM Benchmark PlanBL Baseline Plan
Since there are multiple layers to
this project, we are going to focus
primarily on the Benchmark
10. 8/22/2020 10
BALANCED SCORECARD
Scientific PKGS
Institutes
Technology
Raised
Research
Funded Funds
Notification
Developer
Tasking
Digital Portals
Push Thru Funds
Requirements
SCRUM BOOK COST
Funds/Activities
Reporting is made available. Six Major Roles
manage the Scorecard Requirements, but
multiple individuals are involved in the build.
INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
KPI MANAGERS
WATCH
Brij Consulting
Some slack needs to be built
into the Plan for Delay and
other Scope Changes
11. 8/22/2020 11
BALANCED SCORECARD
CHURNING/GROWTH PERSPECTIVE
GOALS Instances Funds
FUNDING
SPENDING
BOOKING
REPORTING
SET FLAGS
1. Revenue Recognition depends on the timely release of Funding
2. Spending creates Activity to Book; also to make Appropriations to Report on ‘Asset Readiness’
3. Goals Require Continuous Measures and Measurements
4. Funds Release Require a Payback and the Booking of a Return on Assets
5. Customer Utilization Plays a large role in the Funding of Future Projects Brij Consulting
1
2
3 4
5
46290.5 B
Mid Yr3
15,499.4 B
2,056.8 B
12. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 12
The clock is important when you are making objects or
doing tasks in a framework that is bound on the clock
basis, which in our example the clock requires 44.5822
on clock basis to obtain the earn back, that will pay the
stakeholder back in 4.48 years. You can see by the
addition of the 29 factor that it is leveraged.
Some notes on XY Review3 we named it CHI[NG}
The multiplication of time and motion dimensions of xy
must be augmented to achieve 1752, as the new T&M
key. We have two facts, one of [21.005 x 83.415] or
1.007429 x [XY] review3. Green Material would be
affected by the XY dimensions, but CHI alters the
dimensional attributes by augmenting the frames.
v1.5001368000
TIME AND MOTION EFFECT THE PARAMETERS OF THE PROJECT
13. 8/22/2020 13
BALANCED SCORECARD
Establish Tasking of Scrum and KPI
initiatives
Develop Project Scope and Arrangement of
Instances
Record and Present Results, including
Pushback to Parameters of Scope
Acquire Funding and Customer Revenues.
Payback Investors and Debtors
Brij Consulting
14. The Ark Scorecard V2 will demonstrate
the result of setting up the instances and
V3 will display the results of operation
Brij Consulting 8/22/2020 14
BALANCED SCORECARD
The Digital Build in Scorecard provides an Ark Product Emulation Stage to Examine Concepts
V1 Setup
V2 Instances
V3 Operation
15. Brij Consulting 8/22/2020 15
V2 Building Instances
Build
New Crystal Patterns, Light Coupling Arrangement
DIGITAL TO ARK PRODUCT TRANSITION
16. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 16
BALANCED SCORECARD
218 218 218 200
7,267 7,326 6,091 6,575
6,953 6,953
6,953 6,953
2,991 3,803 5,953
7,772
-
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
25,000.00
Benchmark Year 1 Benchmark Year 2 Benchmark Year 3 Ark Year 4
PRICE COMPONENTS
variable portion fixed portion income per unit (p) implicit costs (reserves)
Benchmark Year 1
Benchmark Year 2
Benchmark Year 3
Ark Year 4
-
1.00
2.00
Margin ROA
ROI
RATES
Margin ROA ROI
Benchmark Year 1 1.61 0.80 0.83
Benchmark Year 2 1.70 0.82 0.84
Benchmark Year 3 1.90 0.60 0.61
Ark Year 4 1.94 0.78 0.80
ROI
Assets Purchased Years 3 & 4 cause ratio to fall but regains on
productive delivery of Sales Margin; Return of Investment
18. YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4
Sales 0 26,671,388 54,676,347 94,211,651 362,655,20
EBITDA 0 15,286,902 31,338,150 64,243,209 230,409,71
Assets 0 20,437,285 39,179,740 59,620,793 421,541,12
Equity 0 18,399,553 37,206,788 57,783,200 404,840,49
0
50,000,000,000,000
100,000,000,000,000
150,000,000,000,000
200,000,000,000,000
250,000,000,000,000
300,000,000,000,000
350,000,000,000,000
400,000,000,000,000
450,000,000,000,000
Sales EBITDA Assets Equity
Benchmark to Ark
Return of
Investment
TREND RATIOS
on aggregate
Sales and
Income
(smooths
volume and
price changes)
Shortfall on
Push Funding
Requirement
Debt
Restructure
19. 8/22/2020 19
BALANCED SCORECARD
Benchmark Yr1
Benchmark Yr2
Benchmark Yr3
Ark Mode Yr4
Technological Funding of Digital and Ark
Tooling and Productive Applications
Delivery of the Digital Operational
Assembly and Customer Portal moving to
Ark Production and Product Assembly
Brij Consulting
Start Funding
Assemble Team
Digital Build
Ark Mode Assembly
Margin ROA ROI
YEAR 1 57% 74.8% 83%
YEAR 2 57% 80.0% 84%
YEAR 3 68% 107.8% 111%
YEAR 4 69% 54.7% 57%
y = -0.0611x + 0.7246
R² = 0.6155
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 Linear (YEAR 4)
y = 220,214,738,434,974.00ln(x) - 45,406,064,494,980.10
R² = 0.52
(100,000,000,000,000) - 100,000,000,000,000 200,000,000,000,000 300,000,000,000,000 400,000,000,000,000 500,000,000,000,000
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
Financial Change
Equity Assets EBITDA Sales Log. (Equity)
21. BALANCED SCORECARD
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit. Morbi condimentum euismod elit
eu viverra. Etiam cursus nec lacus nec rhoncus.
Pellentesque ac hendrerit enim. Fusce id odio et
erat tincidunt sodales at a elit.
y = -22,284,339,827,724.20ln(x) + 13,895,860,917,345.30
R² = 0.38 y = 9,990,535,464,370.86ln(x) - 2,124,563,541,958.93
R² = 0.15
(50,000,000,000,000) - 50,000,000,000,000
Capital Spending
Cash Investing
Conversion
Income Spending
Adjustment
Funding Activities Log. ( Activities ) Log. ( Funding )
8/22/2020 21Brij Consulting
(2,000,000,000,000)
-
2,000,000,000,000
4,000,000,000,000
6,000,000,000,000
8,000,000,000,000
10,000,000,000,000
12,000,000,000,000
14,000,000,000,000
16,000,000,000,000
EQUIPMENT
PROJECTS (CAPITAL)
ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION
CHANNELS
PRODUCTION
SERVICES
BENCHMARK
EQUIPMENT
FINANCIAL
QUALITY METRIC
COST METRIC
ADJUSTMENT
Year 3 Benchmark
22284-
13895 =
8389 A
9990+
2125 =
12115 F
Gap Effect =
Net 3726
Graphical Digital numbers and the
cyclical numbers of portfolio and
financial calculations aren’t in
complete agreement
22. 8/22/2020Brij Consulting
23
METRIC ANALYSIS FOR ARK
PRODUCT COMPOSITES
CONTENT:
Push Loss due to Time and
Motion, Gains lost due to
clock and string, Margin
recovery and Payback
1311
1451
+7
Earnback not yet
implemented
.0209
.0206
147Gap
23. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 24
The ARK transition does not
display the huge influx of
Thru-put expected in the
next period that will change
the Economies of Scale. So
our next focus must be in
splitting out the Scorecard to
accommodate the various
types of products that are
anticipated.
Essentially, we want
to unbury these
facts
Scale
Ching Calc:
21.00507584 n
X 1.00749061 g
X 1.29 (Chi) =
23.302504901 –
23.30788494 =
.00538
7x Scale
24. BALANCED
SCORECARD
25
Requirements for V3 Operational Scorecard
• Develop Scorecard Tasks for Scrum and KPI’s for Management
Delivery of Supply Chain Solutions
• Develop an Assembled Report and Test the Metrics for
compliance with standard field
• Create Scorecard Assembly by Product Line
• Carry the current Ark Production out for at least another year to
smooth the economies of scale problem created from transitioning
from digital to Ark economy. Test the Metric Change.
• The Push Funding Requirement is falling short because the
Earnback Program^ is not implemented in the Scorecard yet
(covers the analog to digital impact)
• Discuss Manifold Requirement (adjust slow clock)
• View operations of all instances (save for another paper,) and the
transactional mechanics
^Earnback feature is part of a continuous cost savings program
Brij Consulting 8/22/2020Items highlighted in Green will require a new paper
25. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 26
Sum of Scale year 2
Sum of Year 2
Sum of Scale Year 3
Sum of Year 3
Sum of Ark
Benchmark Digital to Ark Economic Transition
6,000,000,000,000,000 - 8,000,000,000,000,000
4,000,000,000,000,000 - 6,000,000,000,000,000
2,000,000,000,000,000 - 4,000,000,000,000,000
- - 2,000,000,000,000,000
(2,000,000,000,000,000)- -
(4,000,000,000,000,000)- (2,000,000,000,000,000)
(6,000,000,000,000,000)- (4,000,000,000,000,000)
(8,000,000,000,000,000)- (6,000,000,000,000,000)
Digital
Platform
Ark
Transition
Ark
Slow
Cash
Recovery
1Q Year 5
Digital to Ark Scale
Recalibrated for VIEW
Gap
26. 27
BrijConsulting
8/22/2020
Year 5: Asset Purchase
2449
1592
857
1060
630
1690
-833
147
-686
Log terms in self balancing equation
Net shown
T&M facts
686 =eq. 668 Ark Assets Purchased @ Funds Available and Spend
Graphical Digital numbers and the
cyclical numbers of portfolio and
financial calculations aren’t in
complete agreement
y = -2,449,057,427,672,210.00ln(x) + 1,592,671,618,448,980.00
R² = 0.18
y = 670,197,444,493,340.00ln(x) + 110,583,877,757,865.00
R² = 0.01
(10,000,000,000,000,000) (5,000,000,000,000,000) - 5,000,000,000,000,000 10,000,000,000,000,000
CapitalSpendingCashInvestingConversionIncomeSpendingAdjustment
Funding Activities Log. ( Activities ) Log. ( Funding )
Flag This
Asset Generation is
creating Clock Burden
27. 28
BrijConsulting
8/22/2020
Year 6: Norm
y = -1,977,657,469,711,210.00ln(x) + 2,017,662,676,742,620.00
R² = 0.08
y = 2,302,472,642,898,110.00ln(x) - 2,080,554,837,687,360.00
R² = 0.13
-10000000000000000 -5000000000000000 5000000000000000 10000000000000000
Capital
SpendingCashInvestingConversion
Income
SpendingAdjustment
Ark Year 6
Funding Activities Log. ( Activities ) Log. ( Funding )
Year 6 ARK Activities Funding
Capital Spending 30,276,756,517,929.70 (1,398,116,606,145.27)
Cash Investing 319,349,639,851,768.00 (2,868,307,453,952,600.00)
Conversion 6,683,203,225,502,640.00 (4,043,139,867,319,590.00)
Income Spending (699,185,309,146,053.00) 6,186,907,636,811,030.00
Adjustment (5,713,349,735,306,820.00) 1,346,232,378,486,780.00
Value Added in the Ark Enterprise is
demonstrated by the Conversion
Norms achieved in Ark instances
Having Achieved a Norm of
Operations we can build out the
Operational Scorecards that
demonstrate the Products
Successful
Burden
Management
Enterprise Burden of
making Digital to Ark
Transition successful!
29. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 30
-
5,000,000,000,000,000
10,000,000,000,000,000
15,000,000,000,000,000
YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8
Financial Attribution of the Ark
Sales EBITDA Assets Equity
Attribute funding
to Project see
slide31
y = -0.14ln(x) + 0.44
R² = 0.26
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8
Ratio Attribution of the Ark
Asset Turns Margin ROA
Assets/Equity ROI Log. (ROI)
The Financial
Results from
development of
multiple instances
show a more
controlled approach
to planning system
requirements
30. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 31
Attribute funding to
Project reducing Admin.
Costs and flagging
payback in Year 7
31. Brij Consulting 8/22/2020 32
V3 Operational Scorecard Discussed
DIGITAL TO ARK PRODUCT TRANSITION
Our Development of the Operation Scorecard is more involved in breaking out the
functional Products and developing the Scrum and KPI attribution. Due to the size of this
presentation we will continue this process in another presentation called ARK V3
OPERATIONAL SCORECARD PRODUCTION
There is a Manifold requirement in Ark Production of scalable materials, but it requires
gates and architecture that is quite upscale. Various time emulations will enable the
compositional aspects of a manifold design to be developed.
Because we have developed norms and standards in an approach to building more
Advanced Ark Design Products, we will continue to test our design of the Scorecard
Method and the means to cost both digital and Ark Products. We will further develop the
earn back and asset replacement program as we go along.
BALANCED SCORECARD
33. 34
Time and Motion is revealed in the
Bible in several passages and has
helped us to bring into the Light
many aspects of Advanced Ark
thinking because of the insightful
instruction of prayer and various
documents like the Mystical City of
God
34. Brij Consulting 8/22/2020 35
An exceptional fact of
History is that in 1531 Our
Lady of Guadalupe placed
roses in a Native Garment
to assist the people in
overcoming the paganized
stone and clock (notice
the burden in the year.)
Then in 1754 the
apparition was approved,
(whereas our original time
and motion was 1755.)
The use of a new
augmented
crystal will lift
the burden of
the people again
Burden
35. 8/22/2020 Brij Consulting 36
originally revised
Noted on
8/21/20 JM
This is one of those God-favored
moments where He asked us to
change our calc and test it based on
the clock, it improved it
test
See our
new Ching
Calculation
Slide 24