هذ الملف خاص بتقويم اى رسالة ماجستير او دكتوراه - وهو لجميع الطلاب من جميع التخصصات - من الطب الى الآداب او العلوم او التمريض وكذلك طبعا التربية و الصيدله- مع تحياااااااااتى أ.د/ مجدى مهدى

1. Thesis evaluation
By
Magdy M. Aly
Faculty of Education
Ain Shams University
Facebook : Magdy Aly

2. :Originality and significance
Title / new and not repeated •
Problem of research is a real one / it •
serves study
The problem is clearly stated •
The research is a contribution to the field •
The research has applications and •
implications

3. Clarity of theoretical background:
The t.b is written according to a clear line of thought/ personality
and the style of the research
No cut and paste
The T.b. is related and connected with the problem of the
research
Questions or hypotheses are formulated in light of the problem
and the t.b and related to the research objectives
Previous studies are relevant to the topic of the research.
The research has his own views concerning these previous
studies (analysis, appreciation, evaluation, comment) and the
)gaps (handicaps) in these studies which need to be bridged (met

4. :Method of the research
Objectives are related to the problem of the •
research
Questions are research questions that need •
procedures and tools in order to be answered
Sample is representative •
Experimental design is adequate •
Tools are reliable and valid •
Administration of tools, instructions and •
scoring are intact

5. Statistical techniques
Appropriate •
Deductions are accurate without fallacies •
and exaggerations

6. :Consistency in analyzing results
Tables are readable, their results are •
related to questions or hypotheses of the
study
Analysis of data answered all the •
research questions

7. Accuracy in discussing and
: interpreting results
Discussion of the research results in •
comparison with results of other studies
Objectivity in deductions •
Recommendations are related to results •
and conclusions

8. :Clarity of language
:Clarity of language •
Readable •
Well constructed •
Not redundancy •
No misleading sentences or phrases •

9. :Style of presentation
Logical sequence of research items •
(Introduction- Theoretical background-
the problem- objectives- questions-
sample- tools –results – discussion –
conclusion – recommendations –
(references – appendices
Balance in presenting these parts •
Line of thought •

10. References are enough and •
:documentation
Accurate •
Scientific •
Up to date •

11. Ethical Considerations
Getting permissions- •
Citations- •
Honesty- •
Confidentiality- •
TRIPS- •