SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 45
Lupus and Kidney

Naheed Ansari, MD FASN
      10/15/12
Systemic Lupus Erythematosis
• The term “Lupus Erythematosis” was introduced in
  19th century to describe skin lesions
• 100 years later, it was realized that it is a systemic
  disease and it is causes by some aberrant
  autoimmunity
• Prevalence- 1 case per 2000 population
• Currently, US 322,000 have SLE
• Incidence higher in African Americans,Hispanics,
  and Asian ancestry
• 4 year survival rate- 50% in 1950s
• 15 year survival rate- 80% in 2012
Lupus Nephritis
• Multisystem involvement
• Lupus patients are more at risk for development of
  kidney disease than people who do not have lupus
• Kidney involvement can occur in upto 50% of patients
  with SLE. It usually occurs within first 5 years of
  diagnosis of SLE.
• Renal involvement can occur before ACR criterion for
  SLE is made
• Patients with SLE can also develop kidney disease due
  to other medical problems like Diabetes Mellitus
Lupus Nephritis
• Defined as presence of abnormal elements in
  the urine of patients with SLE
              •   red blood cells, white blood cells
              •   Red blood cell casts in urine

• Presence of protein >0.5gm/Day
• Elevated serum creatinine reflecting kidney
  damage
• occurs both in children and
• adults
                                                       4
Lupus Nephritis




        Cameron et al:JASN 1999

                                  5
Lupus Nephritis- Clinical
              Features
• History:
• Patients usually experience other symptoms of active
  SLE like rash, fatique, arthritis,serositis or clinical CNS
  disease
• Some patients are asymptomatic usually with
  mesangial/membranous lupus nephritis.
• Some patients experience swelling of the body due to
  proteinuria. Some are hypertensive along with
  proteinuria.
• Some have symptoms associated with hypertension like
  dizziness,headaches and heart failure
Lupus Nephritis- Clinical
              Features
• Physical Examination:
• Evidence of rash, oral or nasal ulcers, joint swelling,
  brown or foamy urine and changes in amount of
  urine
• Patients with active lupus nephritis have
  hypertension, peripheral edema, and occasionally
  heart failure
• With membranous nephropathy, signs of nephrotic
  syndrome( peripheral edema, ascites, pericardial
  effusion and pleural effusions can be seen.
Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis
• Blood tests
           » BUN
           » Serum Creatinine
           » Laboratory tests for lupus disease activity like complement
             level, antibodies to DNA, ESR,CRP etc
• Urine tests
           » Urinalysis- presence of blood or protein in the urine as well
             as presence of red blood cell casts
           » Spot urine for protein/creatinine ratio
           » 24 hour urine for creatinine clearance and protein
• Kidney biopsy
International Society of Nephrology/Renal
     Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 classification of
                       lupus nephritis
•   Class I Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis
•   Normal glomeruli by light microscopy, but mesangial immune deposits by immunofluorescence

•   Class II Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis
•   Purely mesangial hypercellularity of any degree or mesangial matrix expansion by light microscopy, with mesangial
    immune deposits

•   Class III Focal lupus nephritis
•   Active or inactive focal, segmental or global endo- or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving <50% of all
    glomeruli, typically with focal subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations
     –   A=active lesions, C=chronic lesions


•   Class IV Diffuse lupus nephritis
•   Active or inactive diffuse, segmental or global endo- or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving >50% of all
    glomeruli, typically with diffuse subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations.
     –   This class is divided into diffuse segmental(IV-S) lupus nephritis when 50% of the involved glomeruli have segmental lesions, and diffuse
         global (IV-G) lupus nephritis when 50% of the involved glomeruli have global lesions.
     –   A=active lesions, C=chronic lesions


•   Class V Membranous lupus nephritis
•   Global or segmental subepithelial immune deposits or their morphologic sequelae by light microscopy and by
    immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, with or without mesangial alterations
     –   Class V lupus nephritis may occur in combination with class III or IV in which case both will be diagnosed
Lupus Nephritis- Biopsy
           Findings


                            Mesangioproliferative Lupus Nephritis




Norma Kidney- Light Micro
Lupus Nephritis( Biopsy
              Findings)
Proliferative GN with
necrosis                Cellular Crescent
Lupus Nephritis




Lupus Membranous- LM   Lupus Membranous- EM
Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Podocytopathy-LM   Lupus Podocytopathy- EM
IF staining for IgG




IgG-TBM deposits                         IgG vessel wall deposits
US NIH renal Pathology System for Lupus
Nephritis
Treatment of Lupus Nephritis
• Depends upon class of LN diagnosed on kidney biopsy along with
  presence of extra-renal manifestations of SLE

• Goal of treatment is to normalize kidney function, reduce
  proteinuria, and prevent progressive loss of kidney function.

• Conservative (Non-immunomodulatory) treatment is appropriate for
  Class I and II LN

• RAAS Blockade with ACE/ARB delays progression of Lupus Nephritis
• (Durán-Barragán S et al. Rheumatology 2008;47:1093-1096)

• Spironolactone significantly reduces proteinuria and lowers levels of
  anti ds DNA and anti ss DNA
• (Role of aldosterone blockade in murine lupus nephritis Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R5)
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the development of renal involvement as a function of the use of
                                        ACE inhibitors.




 Durán-Barragán S et al. Rheumatology 2008;47:1093-1096
Treatment of Lupus Nephritis
• Patients with proliferative classes of lupus
  nephritis need immunomodulatory treatment
  to turn off the immune system.
      • Induction: usually Corticosteroids with either
       Cyclophosphamide or Mycophenalate are used for first
       six months
      • Maintenance: usually with lowest and best
       tolerated immunosuppressive medication. Azathioprine
       or Mycophenalate are used based on recent clinical
       trials
Induction Treatment
• It is initial intense treatment given to induce
  remission of active disease
• Corticosteroids
          » PO or IV
          » 3 day Pulse( 7mg/kg/day) followed by 1mg/kg/day ( not
            exceeding 60mg/day) for 8 weeks and then taper
          » Glucocorticoids alone is significantly less effective
• Immunosuppressive agents
          » Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) given IV
          » Mycophenalate Mofetil (cellcept) administered orally
          » Azathioprine( Imuran)
Cyclophosphamide
• Efficacious when used in conjunction with
  glucocorticoids
• can be used intravenously or orally
• Used in dose of 0.5- 1.0gm/m2 monthly for six
  months and then quarterly for at least two
  years
• Can be given in biweekly doses of 500mg/m2
• Toxicity remains an issue
Standard “NIH protocol” dosing
    Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide Alone or in Combination in
                              Patients w LN


• Randomized Controlled Trial in 85 Pts

•   Treatment                                         Remission
•   IV Cyt x 6 mo + q 3rd mo             13/21 62%
•   Methylpred 1 g/m2 x 1yr                   7/24 29%
•   Combined Therapy                          17/20 85%

• Gourly MF, et al. Ann Int Med. 125:549, 1996
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Failure of Therapy
                                               Illei GG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2 001




                             1.0                                                                    Cy + MP
                                                                                                    Cy alone
                             0.9                                                                    MP alone
                             0.8
  Probability That Therapy




                             0.7
       Would Not Fail




                             0.6
                             0.5
                             0.4
                                   Patients at Risk
                             0.3   27    25    25     24   23   22   18   18   17   11      7   Cy
                             0.2
                                   28    27    27     26   23   23   20   20   17   15    12    Cy + MP
                                   27    23    23     19   17   13   11   10   10     8     6   MP
                                    0         24           48        72        96         120
                                    Months From Study Entry
Long-term Follow-up of Protocol Completers in
                   WHO Class IV LN
                           50                                    Dialysis
                                                                 Doubling SCr
                           40                                   50% Rise SCr
            Patients (%)




                           30


                           20


                           10


                                0
                                    MP alone         CY alone   MP + CY
                                    (n = 24*)        (n = 21)   (n = 20)


*14 of 24 patients received CY after study completion
Illei GG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:248-257.
• Multicenter Prospective Clinical trial

• Enrolled 90 patients from September 1996 – 2000 in 19
  European centers

• Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of low dose
  IV CYC for remission induction followed by AZA
Euro Lupus Trial- Study Design
                      90 Patients with LN Class
                                III-V




                                        Low Dose IV CYC
          High Dose IV CYC                      44
                   46                   (6 pulses of 500mg
        (6 monthly pulses and 2               q2wks)
            quaterly pulses)


             40 Remained in the study       38 Remained in the study
Euro Lupus Trial Treatment failure

                           100

                            90                            LD
     Free of Failure (%)




                            80
                                                       HD
                            70

                            60

                            50                                           HD
                                                                         LD

                             0
                                 0   12      24      36         48          60
                                          Follow-up (months)

                                                               Houssiau et al., Arthritis Rheum, 2002
Mycophenalate Mofetil-
Cellcept
Efficacy of MMF vs sequential PO CYT-AZA in 42
              patients with DPLN

                                                 Group 1: MMF
                                                 (2 g x 6 mo,
                                                 then 1 g x 6 mo)
                                                 + prednisone
                                                 (0.8 mg/kg)

                                                 Group 2: POCY
                                                 (2.5 mg/kg/d
                                                 x 6 mo), then
                                                 AZA (1.5-2.0
                                                 mg/kg/d) +
                                                 prednisone

                                    Pts (%)


                 Chan TM et al. New Engl J Med 2000; 343:1156-62.
Multicenter Trial of MMF vs IV CTX for
        Induction Therapy of Severe LN
• Multicenter, randomized, non-blinded trial of
  induction RX for severe active LN
• Designed as equivalence trial
   • Calculated sample size: 64/ Rx arm
• Hypothesis: MMF has equivalent efficacy with
  superior toxicity/tolerability profile vs. IVC
•
•   Ginzler et al. N Eng J Med 2005
Baseline Patient Characteristics
                         MMF (n=71) IVC (n=69)
Age ( yrs)               32.5 ± 10.0   31.0 ± 9.0
Female                   61 (86%)      65 (94%)
Black                    43 (61%)      36 (52%)
Duration of SLE, mo.     43.72 ± 66.88 58.70 ± 80.64
Screatinine, mg/dL       1.06 ± 0.52   1.08 ± 0.49
Urine protein, g/24 hr   4.06 ± 3.14   4.41 ± 3.51
Urine sediment
   RBC/hpf               24.1 ± 50.3   33.2 ± 115.5
   WBC/hpf               12.6 ± 23.5   10.3 ± 17.3

Salbumin, g/L            2.81 ± 0.95   2.69 ± 0.56
Remission Rates: MMF vs. IVC
                        Intent to treat analysis
                                           P=0.009
Percent Responding




                      P=0.005    P=NS
• Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Open label trial
  comparing MMF to IV Cyclophosphamide

• Background: Smaller studies have shown that MMF may offer
  advantages over IV Cyclophosphamide for treatment of Lupus
  Nephritis but there is no large International Randomized control
  trial

• Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of MMF as Induction
  therapy in Lupus Nephritis

• Hypothesis: More patents with Lupus Nephritis would respond to
  MMF than IV Cyclophosphamide during 24 weeks
ALMS TRIAL – RCT MMF vs IVC in Severe LN
                      Appel , Contreras, Dooley et al JASN 2009

                                  Randomized (n = 370)
     MMF                              Open-label treatment                            IVC


  Allocated to MMF                                                      Allocated to IVC
       (n = 185)                                                            (n = 185)
Received MMF (n = 184)                                              Received IVC (n = 180)
  Withdrawals (n = 35)                                                 Withdrawals (n = 29)
  Due to adverse event (n = 24)
   Consent withdrawn (n = 6)                                            Due to adverse event (n = 13)
      Other reason (n = 5)                                               Consent withdrawn (n = 5)
                                                                           Other reason (n = 11)



  Primary endpoint: responders in randomized population (n = 370)

                                       Responders

                                    Maintenance phase
     Double-blind re-randomization to corticosteroids plus MMF or azathioprine for up to 3 years
Figure 2. Response rates of study population and by racial group




Appel, G. B. et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:1103-1112
Summary – Induction Phase
     Therapy for Class III or IV LN
• Multiple options
  – Standard, NIH protocol IV CTX
     • 0.75-1.0 g/m2 IV q4 weeks for 6 doses
  – Eurolupus IV CTX
     • 500 mg IV q2 weeks for 6 doses
  – MMF
     • 2000-3000 mg/day for 6 months
• All should be given alongside standard steroid
  regimen
  – 3 days pulse (7 mg/kg) followed by PO steroids at 1
    mg/kg/day (not exceeding 60 mg) for 8 weeks, then taper
Treatment of Resistant LN
• Some patients are challenging for induction
• Plasmaphresis may be beneficial in some cases although randomized
  controlled trials showed no benefit
• Tacrolimus can by used
• Rituximab - FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory,
  CD20-positive B-cell NH Lymphomas and Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody
• Used in many glomerular diseases in uncontrolled trials
• LUNAR study showed that induction of complete or partial remission
  is higher with rituximab as compared to placebo

                                      Rovin et al LUNAR study Arth Rheu 2012
                                      Lewis et al NEJM 1992
                                      Euler et al Arth Rheum 1994
Maintenance Therapy for
                  Proliferative LN
• Up to 50% of patients with LN relapse during reduction in or cessation of
  immunosuppressive therapy
• Relapse rate is 5-15 per 100 patient years with an average of 8 per 100 patient years
  for first 5 years of follow up.
• Treatment is usually continued for 24 months to prevent progressive kidney disease
• Usually treatment with cellcept or azathioprine is continued to keep patient in
  remission and prevent relapses
• Cyclosporine is not used due to high risk of relapse upon withdrawl of drug
• Low dose oral prednisone is continued in most patients receiving maintenance
  therapy with goal to prevent extrarenal symptoms. Usually a dose of 0.05 to
  0.2mg/kg/day is used



                                                    Houssiau et al Maintain Trial 2010
                                                    Chan et al JASN 2005
                                                    Contreras et al NEJM 2004
Treatment of LN- Membranous
             Nephropathy
• Treatment with immunosuppressive drugs is indicated in patients
               »   Severe symptomatic nephrotic syndrome
               »   Rising serum creatinine
               »   Mixed membranous and proliferative lesions on renal biospy
               »   Non immunosuppressive treatment is continued in these patients along with
                   immunosuppressive drugs


• Various drugs can be used in patients with class V lupus nephritis,
  usually Mycophenalate is used for remission of nephrotic syndrome
  because of its safety and better tolerance.
•
• IV cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine can be used as alternative
  when MMF cannot be used.

• Non immunosuppressive agents include use of ACEI, statins, aspirin,
  non dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
Partial and Complete Remission Rates
                     Membranous LN




Radhakrishnan J, Moutzouris D, Ginzler E, and Appel GB
Kidney Int 77:152-160, 2009.
Prognostic Features- Lupus
                   Nephritis
•    End Stage Renal Disease can occur in some patients with lupus
•   Histological Predictors
•   Class IV (diffuse proliferative LN)
•   High activity and chronicity on Biopsy
•   Crescents
•   Interstitial fibrosis
•   Segmental necrotizing lesions
•   Clinical Predictors
•   Hypertension
•   Anemia
•   High baseline serum creatinine
•   Higher baseline proteinuria
•   Delay in therapy
•   Epidemiologic Predictors
•   African American Race
•   Low socioeconomic status
Treatment of LN- ESRD
• Survival rate for individuals with LN after 10 years of diagnosis
  of SLE is reduced to 88%.
• This survival rate is further reduced in African Americans
• 15-20% of patients with lupus nephritis start renal replacement
  therapy if End Stage Renal Disease occurs
• USRDS data shows that 1.4% of ESRD due to LN
                  » Hemodialysis
                  » Peritoneal Dialysis
                  » Kidney Transplantation

                                             Appel et al: AJKD 1987: 83-877
                                             Ortega LM et al: Lupus 2010: 19-557
Hemodialysis
• Patient survival with either hemodialysis or CAPD appears to be similar in
  patients with ESRD ( 5 year survival rate is 90%)
• Most lupus nephritis patients with end-stage renal disease opt for
  hemodialysis therapy(82%)
• Increased risk of death during the first three months of dialysis due to sepsis
  and other complications of high dose of steroids.




                                                           Cheigh et al AJKD 1993: 21:2
                                                           Devlin et al Arth Care & Resear 2011
Peritoneal Dialysis
• Peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantations lower among African-
  Americans, uninsured, and unemployed
• Only 12.2% of LN patients started PD between 1995-2006
• Patients on PD do better than HD after kidney transplantation
• There may be high risk of peritonitis and non catheter related Infections in
  PD.




                                                   Huang et al PDI 2001 21:143
                                                   Siu YP et al NDT 2005 20:2797
                                                   Kasiske et al J Transp 2001
Kidney Transplantation
• Under utilized in patients with LN
• Only 3% of LN patients undergo renal transplantation
• Graft survival rates at 5 and 10 years in patients with lupus are similar to those in
  patients with other diseases.
• Rate of recurrent disease is low ( 2-9% in LN patients)
• Patients with rapidly progressive renal disease
• Should undergo dialysis before kidney transplant
• Measurement of serologic marker such as titres of
•    DNA and complement levels do not help predict
•    disease recurrence
• Kidney transplant recipients with lupus and
• Antiphospholipid antibodies are at increased
• Risk for thrombotic events.
                                            Stone et al Semin Arth Rheu 1997
                                            Choy et al Am J Transplant 2006
Thank You

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Induction agents in renal transplantation
Induction agents in renal transplantationInduction agents in renal transplantation
Induction agents in renal transplantationVishal Golay
 
Rapidly progressive renal failure
Rapidly progressive renal failureRapidly progressive renal failure
Rapidly progressive renal failureAnkit Data
 
Management of Hepatitis B
Management of Hepatitis BManagement of Hepatitis B
Management of Hepatitis BArun Vasireddy
 
Management of Ischemic Stroke
Management of Ischemic StrokeManagement of Ischemic Stroke
Management of Ischemic StrokeRahul Kumar
 
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV Infection
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV InfectionDisorders of the Kidney in HIV Infection
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV InfectionAmanda Valliant
 
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.Boushra Alsaoor
 
Insulin Therapy in DM
Insulin Therapy in DMInsulin Therapy in DM
Insulin Therapy in DMPk Doctors
 
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)Dr.Sayeedur Rumi
 
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an update
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an updateHepatitis B diagnosis and management an update
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an updateAmar Patil
 
Heparine induced thrombocytopenia
Heparine induced thrombocytopeniaHeparine induced thrombocytopenia
Heparine induced thrombocytopeniasamirelansary
 
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019Chetan Ganteppanavar
 
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD Guidelines
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD GuidelinesHepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD Guidelines
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD GuidelinesDr. Afzal Haq Asif
 
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HIT
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HITHeparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HIT
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HITLyndon Woytuck
 
Hepatorenal syndrome
Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome
Hepatorenal syndromeAkshay Goel
 
Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012Amit Agrawal
 
Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016drsamianik
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Induction agents in renal transplantation
Induction agents in renal transplantationInduction agents in renal transplantation
Induction agents in renal transplantation
 
Rapidly progressive renal failure
Rapidly progressive renal failureRapidly progressive renal failure
Rapidly progressive renal failure
 
Lupus nephritis
Lupus nephritisLupus nephritis
Lupus nephritis
 
Management of Hepatitis B
Management of Hepatitis BManagement of Hepatitis B
Management of Hepatitis B
 
Management of Ischemic Stroke
Management of Ischemic StrokeManagement of Ischemic Stroke
Management of Ischemic Stroke
 
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV Infection
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV InfectionDisorders of the Kidney in HIV Infection
Disorders of the Kidney in HIV Infection
 
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
 
Pulmonary Renal Syndorme
Pulmonary Renal Syndorme Pulmonary Renal Syndorme
Pulmonary Renal Syndorme
 
Insulin Therapy in DM
Insulin Therapy in DMInsulin Therapy in DM
Insulin Therapy in DM
 
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopeia (HIT)
 
Renal Disease in HIV/AIDS
Renal Disease in HIV/AIDSRenal Disease in HIV/AIDS
Renal Disease in HIV/AIDS
 
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an update
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an updateHepatitis B diagnosis and management an update
Hepatitis B diagnosis and management an update
 
Heparine induced thrombocytopenia
Heparine induced thrombocytopeniaHeparine induced thrombocytopenia
Heparine induced thrombocytopenia
 
Hepatitis acute
Hepatitis acute Hepatitis acute
Hepatitis acute
 
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019
Hepatitis C : Complete Overview and Recent Updates 2019
 
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD Guidelines
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD GuidelinesHepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD Guidelines
Hepatitis C.Diagnosis and Management. AASLD Guidelines
 
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HIT
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HITHeparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HIT
Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia: HIT
 
Hepatorenal syndrome
Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome
Hepatorenal syndrome
 
Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012
 
Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016
 

Andere mochten auch

Diseases of kidney patho lab pics
Diseases of kidney patho lab picsDiseases of kidney patho lab pics
Diseases of kidney patho lab picsMD Specialclass
 
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...NephroTube - Dr.Gawad
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr Pranav
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr PranavSystemic lupus erythematosus - Dr Pranav
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr PranavPranav S
 
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraThrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraShakeel Arif
 
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic PurpuraIdiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic PurpuraDr. Saad Saleh Al Ani
 

Andere mochten auch (7)

Diseases of kidney patho lab pics
Diseases of kidney patho lab picsDiseases of kidney patho lab pics
Diseases of kidney patho lab pics
 
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Questions & ...
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr Pranav
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr PranavSystemic lupus erythematosus - Dr Pranav
Systemic lupus erythematosus - Dr Pranav
 
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraThrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
 
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic PurpuraIdiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Idiopathic (autoimmune) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
 
Hemolytic uremic Syndrome
Hemolytic uremic SyndromeHemolytic uremic Syndrome
Hemolytic uremic Syndrome
 
Thrombocytopenic purpura
Thrombocytopenic purpuraThrombocytopenic purpura
Thrombocytopenic purpura
 

Ähnlich wie Dialysis and Transplant for Lupus Nephritis

Landmark trial in lupus.pptx
Landmark trial in lupus.pptxLandmark trial in lupus.pptx
Landmark trial in lupus.pptxRitasman Baisya
 
lupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.pptlupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.pptShinilLenin
 
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallah
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallahInterstial nephr mohamed abdallah
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallahFarragBahbah
 
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and management
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and managementLupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and management
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and managementChibuezeNnonyelu1
 
Sle complication
Sle complicationSle complication
Sle complicationMarwa Besar
 
Membranous nephropathy
Membranous nephropathyMembranous nephropathy
Membranous nephropathyVishal Golay
 
Pediatric renal transplantation
Pediatric renal transplantationPediatric renal transplantation
Pediatric renal transplantationahmed eshiba
 
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)Ankit Raiyani
 
renal transplantation-.pptx
renal transplantation-.pptxrenal transplantation-.pptx
renal transplantation-.pptxbhavanibb
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaDrAyush Garg
 
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseases
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseasesBiological therapy in rheumatic diseases
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseasesSamar Tharwat
 
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomas
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomasNuclear medicine in systemic lymphomas
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomasGanesh Kumar
 
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseRecent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseShreya Gupta
 
Sepsis including Managing Low Risk
Sepsis including Managing Low RiskSepsis including Managing Low Risk
Sepsis including Managing Low RiskRecoveryPackage
 
Treatment of-lung-cancer
Treatment of-lung-cancerTreatment of-lung-cancer
Treatment of-lung-cancerHari Prakash
 

Ähnlich wie Dialysis and Transplant for Lupus Nephritis (20)

Landmark trial in lupus.pptx
Landmark trial in lupus.pptxLandmark trial in lupus.pptx
Landmark trial in lupus.pptx
 
lupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.pptlupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.ppt
 
lupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.pptlupus-nephritis.ppt
lupus-nephritis.ppt
 
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallah
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallahInterstial nephr mohamed abdallah
Interstial nephr mohamed abdallah
 
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and management
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and managementLupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and management
Lupus Nephritis-Diagnosis and management
 
Sle complication
Sle complicationSle complication
Sle complication
 
Membranous nephropathy
Membranous nephropathyMembranous nephropathy
Membranous nephropathy
 
Pediatric renal transplantation
Pediatric renal transplantationPediatric renal transplantation
Pediatric renal transplantation
 
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)
Immune thrombocyopenia (ITP)
 
renal transplantation-.pptx
renal transplantation-.pptxrenal transplantation-.pptx
renal transplantation-.pptx
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseases
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseasesBiological therapy in rheumatic diseases
Biological therapy in rheumatic diseases
 
Lupus nephritis nids
Lupus nephritis nidsLupus nephritis nids
Lupus nephritis nids
 
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomas
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomasNuclear medicine in systemic lymphomas
Nuclear medicine in systemic lymphomas
 
Thyroid malignancies
Thyroid malignanciesThyroid malignancies
Thyroid malignancies
 
Oncologic emergencies asim
Oncologic emergencies asimOncologic emergencies asim
Oncologic emergencies asim
 
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseRecent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
 
Sepsis including Managing Low Risk
Sepsis including Managing Low RiskSepsis including Managing Low Risk
Sepsis including Managing Low Risk
 
Aidp
AidpAidp
Aidp
 
Treatment of-lung-cancer
Treatment of-lung-cancerTreatment of-lung-cancer
Treatment of-lung-cancer
 

Mehr von LupusNY

Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
Bag ppt for website  3.14.14Bag ppt for website  3.14.14
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14LupusNY
 
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
Bag ppt for website  3.14.14Bag ppt for website  3.14.14
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14LupusNY
 
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13LupusNY
 
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with Lupus
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with LupusSkin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with Lupus
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with LupusLupusNY
 
Lupus.and.bonehealth
Lupus.and.bonehealthLupus.and.bonehealth
Lupus.and.bonehealthLupusNY
 
Sle body meds.onome
Sle body meds.onomeSle body meds.onome
Sle body meds.onomeLupusNY
 
2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon
2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon
2013 New York Bag Ladies LuncheonLupusNY
 
State of Lupus Treatment: New Therapeutics
State of Lupus Treatment: New TherapeuticsState of Lupus Treatment: New Therapeutics
State of Lupus Treatment: New TherapeuticsLupusNY
 
Lupus foundation educational program 2013
Lupus foundation educational program 2013Lupus foundation educational program 2013
Lupus foundation educational program 2013LupusNY
 
Lupus and the heart
Lupus and the heartLupus and the heart
Lupus and the heartLupusNY
 
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus LupusNY
 
Lupus Treatment and Rehabilitation
Lupus Treatment and RehabilitationLupus Treatment and Rehabilitation
Lupus Treatment and RehabilitationLupusNY
 
Lupus: Why am I hurting?
Lupus: Why am I hurting?Lupus: Why am I hurting?
Lupus: Why am I hurting?LupusNY
 
Lupus and dental issues
Lupus and dental issuesLupus and dental issues
Lupus and dental issuesLupusNY
 
Lupus and cardiovascular disease
Lupus and cardiovascular diseaseLupus and cardiovascular disease
Lupus and cardiovascular diseaseLupusNY
 
Lupus and your kidneys
Lupus and your kidneysLupus and your kidneys
Lupus and your kidneysLupusNY
 
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy Lifestyle
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy LifestyleManaging Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy Lifestyle
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy LifestyleLupusNY
 
Lupus and Your Eyes
Lupus and Your EyesLupus and Your Eyes
Lupus and Your EyesLupusNY
 
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie LupusNY
 
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth Gottlieb
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth GottliebGrowing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth Gottlieb
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth GottliebLupusNY
 

Mehr von LupusNY (20)

Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
Bag ppt for website  3.14.14Bag ppt for website  3.14.14
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
 
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
Bag ppt for website  3.14.14Bag ppt for website  3.14.14
Bag ppt for website 3.14.14
 
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13
Dr. johnson slide presentation 12.13
 
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with Lupus
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with LupusSkin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with Lupus
Skin Care, Weight Control, and Feeling Good with Lupus
 
Lupus.and.bonehealth
Lupus.and.bonehealthLupus.and.bonehealth
Lupus.and.bonehealth
 
Sle body meds.onome
Sle body meds.onomeSle body meds.onome
Sle body meds.onome
 
2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon
2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon
2013 New York Bag Ladies Luncheon
 
State of Lupus Treatment: New Therapeutics
State of Lupus Treatment: New TherapeuticsState of Lupus Treatment: New Therapeutics
State of Lupus Treatment: New Therapeutics
 
Lupus foundation educational program 2013
Lupus foundation educational program 2013Lupus foundation educational program 2013
Lupus foundation educational program 2013
 
Lupus and the heart
Lupus and the heartLupus and the heart
Lupus and the heart
 
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus
Get Into the Loop - Learn About Lupus
 
Lupus Treatment and Rehabilitation
Lupus Treatment and RehabilitationLupus Treatment and Rehabilitation
Lupus Treatment and Rehabilitation
 
Lupus: Why am I hurting?
Lupus: Why am I hurting?Lupus: Why am I hurting?
Lupus: Why am I hurting?
 
Lupus and dental issues
Lupus and dental issuesLupus and dental issues
Lupus and dental issues
 
Lupus and cardiovascular disease
Lupus and cardiovascular diseaseLupus and cardiovascular disease
Lupus and cardiovascular disease
 
Lupus and your kidneys
Lupus and your kidneysLupus and your kidneys
Lupus and your kidneys
 
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy Lifestyle
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy LifestyleManaging Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy Lifestyle
Managing Lupus and Maintaining a Healthy Lifestyle
 
Lupus and Your Eyes
Lupus and Your EyesLupus and Your Eyes
Lupus and Your Eyes
 
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie
Biomarkers for Disease Flare by Emily Baechler Gillespie
 
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth Gottlieb
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth GottliebGrowing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth Gottlieb
Growing Up with Lupus by Dr. Beth Gottlieb
 

Dialysis and Transplant for Lupus Nephritis

  • 1. Lupus and Kidney Naheed Ansari, MD FASN 10/15/12
  • 2. Systemic Lupus Erythematosis • The term “Lupus Erythematosis” was introduced in 19th century to describe skin lesions • 100 years later, it was realized that it is a systemic disease and it is causes by some aberrant autoimmunity • Prevalence- 1 case per 2000 population • Currently, US 322,000 have SLE • Incidence higher in African Americans,Hispanics, and Asian ancestry • 4 year survival rate- 50% in 1950s • 15 year survival rate- 80% in 2012
  • 3. Lupus Nephritis • Multisystem involvement • Lupus patients are more at risk for development of kidney disease than people who do not have lupus • Kidney involvement can occur in upto 50% of patients with SLE. It usually occurs within first 5 years of diagnosis of SLE. • Renal involvement can occur before ACR criterion for SLE is made • Patients with SLE can also develop kidney disease due to other medical problems like Diabetes Mellitus
  • 4. Lupus Nephritis • Defined as presence of abnormal elements in the urine of patients with SLE • red blood cells, white blood cells • Red blood cell casts in urine • Presence of protein >0.5gm/Day • Elevated serum creatinine reflecting kidney damage • occurs both in children and • adults 4
  • 5. Lupus Nephritis Cameron et al:JASN 1999 5
  • 6. Lupus Nephritis- Clinical Features • History: • Patients usually experience other symptoms of active SLE like rash, fatique, arthritis,serositis or clinical CNS disease • Some patients are asymptomatic usually with mesangial/membranous lupus nephritis. • Some patients experience swelling of the body due to proteinuria. Some are hypertensive along with proteinuria. • Some have symptoms associated with hypertension like dizziness,headaches and heart failure
  • 7. Lupus Nephritis- Clinical Features • Physical Examination: • Evidence of rash, oral or nasal ulcers, joint swelling, brown or foamy urine and changes in amount of urine • Patients with active lupus nephritis have hypertension, peripheral edema, and occasionally heart failure • With membranous nephropathy, signs of nephrotic syndrome( peripheral edema, ascites, pericardial effusion and pleural effusions can be seen.
  • 8. Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis • Blood tests » BUN » Serum Creatinine » Laboratory tests for lupus disease activity like complement level, antibodies to DNA, ESR,CRP etc • Urine tests » Urinalysis- presence of blood or protein in the urine as well as presence of red blood cell casts » Spot urine for protein/creatinine ratio » 24 hour urine for creatinine clearance and protein • Kidney biopsy
  • 9. International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 classification of lupus nephritis • Class I Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis • Normal glomeruli by light microscopy, but mesangial immune deposits by immunofluorescence • Class II Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis • Purely mesangial hypercellularity of any degree or mesangial matrix expansion by light microscopy, with mesangial immune deposits • Class III Focal lupus nephritis • Active or inactive focal, segmental or global endo- or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving <50% of all glomeruli, typically with focal subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations – A=active lesions, C=chronic lesions • Class IV Diffuse lupus nephritis • Active or inactive diffuse, segmental or global endo- or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving >50% of all glomeruli, typically with diffuse subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations. – This class is divided into diffuse segmental(IV-S) lupus nephritis when 50% of the involved glomeruli have segmental lesions, and diffuse global (IV-G) lupus nephritis when 50% of the involved glomeruli have global lesions. – A=active lesions, C=chronic lesions • Class V Membranous lupus nephritis • Global or segmental subepithelial immune deposits or their morphologic sequelae by light microscopy and by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, with or without mesangial alterations – Class V lupus nephritis may occur in combination with class III or IV in which case both will be diagnosed
  • 10. Lupus Nephritis- Biopsy Findings Mesangioproliferative Lupus Nephritis Norma Kidney- Light Micro
  • 11. Lupus Nephritis( Biopsy Findings) Proliferative GN with necrosis Cellular Crescent
  • 12. Lupus Nephritis Lupus Membranous- LM Lupus Membranous- EM
  • 13. Lupus Nephritis Lupus Podocytopathy-LM Lupus Podocytopathy- EM
  • 14. IF staining for IgG IgG-TBM deposits IgG vessel wall deposits
  • 15. US NIH renal Pathology System for Lupus Nephritis
  • 16. Treatment of Lupus Nephritis • Depends upon class of LN diagnosed on kidney biopsy along with presence of extra-renal manifestations of SLE • Goal of treatment is to normalize kidney function, reduce proteinuria, and prevent progressive loss of kidney function. • Conservative (Non-immunomodulatory) treatment is appropriate for Class I and II LN • RAAS Blockade with ACE/ARB delays progression of Lupus Nephritis • (Durán-Barragán S et al. Rheumatology 2008;47:1093-1096) • Spironolactone significantly reduces proteinuria and lowers levels of anti ds DNA and anti ss DNA • (Role of aldosterone blockade in murine lupus nephritis Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R5)
  • 17. Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the development of renal involvement as a function of the use of ACE inhibitors. Durán-Barragán S et al. Rheumatology 2008;47:1093-1096
  • 18. Treatment of Lupus Nephritis • Patients with proliferative classes of lupus nephritis need immunomodulatory treatment to turn off the immune system. • Induction: usually Corticosteroids with either Cyclophosphamide or Mycophenalate are used for first six months • Maintenance: usually with lowest and best tolerated immunosuppressive medication. Azathioprine or Mycophenalate are used based on recent clinical trials
  • 19. Induction Treatment • It is initial intense treatment given to induce remission of active disease • Corticosteroids » PO or IV » 3 day Pulse( 7mg/kg/day) followed by 1mg/kg/day ( not exceeding 60mg/day) for 8 weeks and then taper » Glucocorticoids alone is significantly less effective • Immunosuppressive agents » Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) given IV » Mycophenalate Mofetil (cellcept) administered orally » Azathioprine( Imuran)
  • 20. Cyclophosphamide • Efficacious when used in conjunction with glucocorticoids • can be used intravenously or orally • Used in dose of 0.5- 1.0gm/m2 monthly for six months and then quarterly for at least two years • Can be given in biweekly doses of 500mg/m2 • Toxicity remains an issue
  • 21. Standard “NIH protocol” dosing Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide Alone or in Combination in Patients w LN • Randomized Controlled Trial in 85 Pts • Treatment Remission • IV Cyt x 6 mo + q 3rd mo 13/21 62% • Methylpred 1 g/m2 x 1yr 7/24 29% • Combined Therapy 17/20 85% • Gourly MF, et al. Ann Int Med. 125:549, 1996
  • 22. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Failure of Therapy Illei GG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2 001 1.0 Cy + MP Cy alone 0.9 MP alone 0.8 Probability That Therapy 0.7 Would Not Fail 0.6 0.5 0.4 Patients at Risk 0.3 27 25 25 24 23 22 18 18 17 11 7 Cy 0.2 28 27 27 26 23 23 20 20 17 15 12 Cy + MP 27 23 23 19 17 13 11 10 10 8 6 MP 0 24 48 72 96 120 Months From Study Entry
  • 23. Long-term Follow-up of Protocol Completers in WHO Class IV LN 50 Dialysis Doubling SCr 40 50% Rise SCr Patients (%) 30 20 10 0 MP alone CY alone MP + CY (n = 24*) (n = 21) (n = 20) *14 of 24 patients received CY after study completion Illei GG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:248-257.
  • 24. • Multicenter Prospective Clinical trial • Enrolled 90 patients from September 1996 – 2000 in 19 European centers • Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of low dose IV CYC for remission induction followed by AZA
  • 25. Euro Lupus Trial- Study Design 90 Patients with LN Class III-V Low Dose IV CYC High Dose IV CYC 44 46 (6 pulses of 500mg (6 monthly pulses and 2 q2wks) quaterly pulses) 40 Remained in the study 38 Remained in the study
  • 26. Euro Lupus Trial Treatment failure 100 90 LD Free of Failure (%) 80 HD 70 60 50 HD LD 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Follow-up (months) Houssiau et al., Arthritis Rheum, 2002
  • 28. Efficacy of MMF vs sequential PO CYT-AZA in 42 patients with DPLN Group 1: MMF (2 g x 6 mo, then 1 g x 6 mo) + prednisone (0.8 mg/kg) Group 2: POCY (2.5 mg/kg/d x 6 mo), then AZA (1.5-2.0 mg/kg/d) + prednisone Pts (%) Chan TM et al. New Engl J Med 2000; 343:1156-62.
  • 29. Multicenter Trial of MMF vs IV CTX for Induction Therapy of Severe LN • Multicenter, randomized, non-blinded trial of induction RX for severe active LN • Designed as equivalence trial • Calculated sample size: 64/ Rx arm • Hypothesis: MMF has equivalent efficacy with superior toxicity/tolerability profile vs. IVC • • Ginzler et al. N Eng J Med 2005
  • 30. Baseline Patient Characteristics MMF (n=71) IVC (n=69) Age ( yrs) 32.5 ± 10.0 31.0 ± 9.0 Female 61 (86%) 65 (94%) Black 43 (61%) 36 (52%) Duration of SLE, mo. 43.72 ± 66.88 58.70 ± 80.64 Screatinine, mg/dL 1.06 ± 0.52 1.08 ± 0.49 Urine protein, g/24 hr 4.06 ± 3.14 4.41 ± 3.51 Urine sediment RBC/hpf 24.1 ± 50.3 33.2 ± 115.5 WBC/hpf 12.6 ± 23.5 10.3 ± 17.3 Salbumin, g/L 2.81 ± 0.95 2.69 ± 0.56
  • 31. Remission Rates: MMF vs. IVC Intent to treat analysis P=0.009 Percent Responding P=0.005 P=NS
  • 32. • Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Open label trial comparing MMF to IV Cyclophosphamide • Background: Smaller studies have shown that MMF may offer advantages over IV Cyclophosphamide for treatment of Lupus Nephritis but there is no large International Randomized control trial • Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of MMF as Induction therapy in Lupus Nephritis • Hypothesis: More patents with Lupus Nephritis would respond to MMF than IV Cyclophosphamide during 24 weeks
  • 33. ALMS TRIAL – RCT MMF vs IVC in Severe LN Appel , Contreras, Dooley et al JASN 2009 Randomized (n = 370) MMF Open-label treatment IVC Allocated to MMF Allocated to IVC (n = 185) (n = 185) Received MMF (n = 184) Received IVC (n = 180) Withdrawals (n = 35) Withdrawals (n = 29) Due to adverse event (n = 24) Consent withdrawn (n = 6) Due to adverse event (n = 13) Other reason (n = 5) Consent withdrawn (n = 5) Other reason (n = 11) Primary endpoint: responders in randomized population (n = 370) Responders Maintenance phase Double-blind re-randomization to corticosteroids plus MMF or azathioprine for up to 3 years
  • 34. Figure 2. Response rates of study population and by racial group Appel, G. B. et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:1103-1112
  • 35. Summary – Induction Phase Therapy for Class III or IV LN • Multiple options – Standard, NIH protocol IV CTX • 0.75-1.0 g/m2 IV q4 weeks for 6 doses – Eurolupus IV CTX • 500 mg IV q2 weeks for 6 doses – MMF • 2000-3000 mg/day for 6 months • All should be given alongside standard steroid regimen – 3 days pulse (7 mg/kg) followed by PO steroids at 1 mg/kg/day (not exceeding 60 mg) for 8 weeks, then taper
  • 36. Treatment of Resistant LN • Some patients are challenging for induction • Plasmaphresis may be beneficial in some cases although randomized controlled trials showed no benefit • Tacrolimus can by used • Rituximab - FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory, CD20-positive B-cell NH Lymphomas and Rheumatoid Arthritis • Chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody • Used in many glomerular diseases in uncontrolled trials • LUNAR study showed that induction of complete or partial remission is higher with rituximab as compared to placebo Rovin et al LUNAR study Arth Rheu 2012 Lewis et al NEJM 1992 Euler et al Arth Rheum 1994
  • 37. Maintenance Therapy for Proliferative LN • Up to 50% of patients with LN relapse during reduction in or cessation of immunosuppressive therapy • Relapse rate is 5-15 per 100 patient years with an average of 8 per 100 patient years for first 5 years of follow up. • Treatment is usually continued for 24 months to prevent progressive kidney disease • Usually treatment with cellcept or azathioprine is continued to keep patient in remission and prevent relapses • Cyclosporine is not used due to high risk of relapse upon withdrawl of drug • Low dose oral prednisone is continued in most patients receiving maintenance therapy with goal to prevent extrarenal symptoms. Usually a dose of 0.05 to 0.2mg/kg/day is used Houssiau et al Maintain Trial 2010 Chan et al JASN 2005 Contreras et al NEJM 2004
  • 38. Treatment of LN- Membranous Nephropathy • Treatment with immunosuppressive drugs is indicated in patients » Severe symptomatic nephrotic syndrome » Rising serum creatinine » Mixed membranous and proliferative lesions on renal biospy » Non immunosuppressive treatment is continued in these patients along with immunosuppressive drugs • Various drugs can be used in patients with class V lupus nephritis, usually Mycophenalate is used for remission of nephrotic syndrome because of its safety and better tolerance. • • IV cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine can be used as alternative when MMF cannot be used. • Non immunosuppressive agents include use of ACEI, statins, aspirin, non dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
  • 39. Partial and Complete Remission Rates Membranous LN Radhakrishnan J, Moutzouris D, Ginzler E, and Appel GB Kidney Int 77:152-160, 2009.
  • 40. Prognostic Features- Lupus Nephritis • End Stage Renal Disease can occur in some patients with lupus • Histological Predictors • Class IV (diffuse proliferative LN) • High activity and chronicity on Biopsy • Crescents • Interstitial fibrosis • Segmental necrotizing lesions • Clinical Predictors • Hypertension • Anemia • High baseline serum creatinine • Higher baseline proteinuria • Delay in therapy • Epidemiologic Predictors • African American Race • Low socioeconomic status
  • 41. Treatment of LN- ESRD • Survival rate for individuals with LN after 10 years of diagnosis of SLE is reduced to 88%. • This survival rate is further reduced in African Americans • 15-20% of patients with lupus nephritis start renal replacement therapy if End Stage Renal Disease occurs • USRDS data shows that 1.4% of ESRD due to LN » Hemodialysis » Peritoneal Dialysis » Kidney Transplantation Appel et al: AJKD 1987: 83-877 Ortega LM et al: Lupus 2010: 19-557
  • 42. Hemodialysis • Patient survival with either hemodialysis or CAPD appears to be similar in patients with ESRD ( 5 year survival rate is 90%) • Most lupus nephritis patients with end-stage renal disease opt for hemodialysis therapy(82%) • Increased risk of death during the first three months of dialysis due to sepsis and other complications of high dose of steroids. Cheigh et al AJKD 1993: 21:2 Devlin et al Arth Care & Resear 2011
  • 43. Peritoneal Dialysis • Peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantations lower among African- Americans, uninsured, and unemployed • Only 12.2% of LN patients started PD between 1995-2006 • Patients on PD do better than HD after kidney transplantation • There may be high risk of peritonitis and non catheter related Infections in PD. Huang et al PDI 2001 21:143 Siu YP et al NDT 2005 20:2797 Kasiske et al J Transp 2001
  • 44. Kidney Transplantation • Under utilized in patients with LN • Only 3% of LN patients undergo renal transplantation • Graft survival rates at 5 and 10 years in patients with lupus are similar to those in patients with other diseases. • Rate of recurrent disease is low ( 2-9% in LN patients) • Patients with rapidly progressive renal disease • Should undergo dialysis before kidney transplant • Measurement of serologic marker such as titres of • DNA and complement levels do not help predict • disease recurrence • Kidney transplant recipients with lupus and • Antiphospholipid antibodies are at increased • Risk for thrombotic events. Stone et al Semin Arth Rheu 1997 Choy et al Am J Transplant 2006

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. 83% of patients enrolled in the study completed the full 24-week course of treatment. Inclusion criteria Age 12–75 years Diagnosis of SLE per American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria Kidney biopsy within the 6 months prior to first randomization Lupus nephritis (International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society [ISN/RPS] 2003 classification) class III, IV-S, or IV-G, (A) or (A/C), or V, alone or in combination with class III or IV Exclusion criteria Continuous dialysis for more than 2 weeks before randomization and/or expected 8 weeks Pancreatitis, GI hemorrhage within 6 months, active peptic ulcer within 3 months Severe viral infection Severe cardiovascular disease Bone marrow insufficiency, with cytopenias not attributable to SLE Current infection requiring intravenous antibiotics Maintenance phase: Double-blind, double-dummy, randomized (re-randomized), MMF orally 2 g/day or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day with corticosteroids to a maximum of 10 mg/day, to treatment failure (or up to 3 years for last patient)