SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 58
11
Housing, Household Amenities and AssetsHousing, Household Amenities and Assets
- Data Highlights from Census 2011- Data Highlights from Census 2011
CENSUS AND NPR SECTION
DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS,KERALA 22
HOUSELISTING & HOUSING CENSUS 2010-
Census 2011
Objective
 Prepare an unambiguous frame for Population
Enumeration
 Collect data on housing, amenities and assets
Carried out during April- May 2010
33
Image based
Recognition (ICR)
Manual completion of
unrecognized characters
Census 2011 ProcessCensus 2011 Process
Scanning
Database/
Tabulation
Data
Dissemination
Image validation
44
DATA COLLECTIONDATA COLLECTION
 35 items of information collected35 items of information collected
 ICR technology used for dataICR technology used for data
processingprocessing
 Houselisting and HousingHouselisting and Housing
Census excluded houselessCensus excluded houseless
households.households.
The data on amenities and assets
covers normal households only and
excludes Institutional households 55
Data HighlightsData Highlights
66
Part-1
Housing
77
• Use of Census Houses
• Housing stock
• Construction material
• Number of dwelling rooms
• Household size
• Number of married couples in a
household
Coverage:
88
Total number of Census Houses increased 19.9% in
Kerala.
There are 1,12,17,853 Census Houses in Kerala.
Number of Occupied Census Houses is 89.4%.
Residence and Residence cum other use is 68.7%.
HOUSING - QUANTITY
99
Census Houses – Kerala 2011
Census Houses Total Rural Urban
Total 1,12,17,853 58,57,785 53,60,068
Occupied 1,00,28,709 52,71,787 47,56,922
Residential 76,58,685 40,66,488 35,92,197
Residential-cum-other uses 44,931 23,035 21,896
Non-residential 22,31,539 11,38,712 10,92,827
Vacant 11,89,144 5,85,998 6,03,146
Number of households 77,16,370 40,95,674 36,20,696
1010
Census Houses Total Rural Urban
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0
Occupied 89.4 90.0 88.7
Residential 76.4 77.1 75.5
Residential-cum-other
uses
0.4 0.4 0.5
Non-residential 22.3 21.6 23.0
Vacant 10.6 10.0 11.3
Number of households 100.0 53.1 46.9
Census Houses – Kerala 2011
Percentage share
1111
Census House
Total Rural Urban
Abs % Abs % Abs %
Number of census
houses
18.6 19.9 -10.3 -15.0 29.0 117.7
Occupied census houses 14.0 16.3 -11.1 -17.5 25.2 112.5
Used as residence 11.7 18.0 -8.0 -16.5 19.7 121.8
Used as residence-cum-
other use
-0.05 -9.4 -0.1 -31.9 0.06 38.8
Housing stock 11.6 17.8 -8.2 -16.6 19.8 121.0
(In lakhs)
Variation in the Number of Census
Houses – Kerala 2001 & 2011
• 18.6 lakhs Census Houses added in 2001-11
• Largest addition in Malappuram (2.9 lakhs); followed by Kozhikode (2.0
lakhs), Thrissur (1.9 lakhs)
1212
Use of Occupied Census Houses
Kerala : 2011
Houselist Item Absolute number
Total Rural Urban
Total number of occupied census
houses 10,028,709 5,271,787 4,756,922
Occupied Census Houses used as
Residence 7,658,685 4,066,488 3,592,197
Residence -cum- other use 44,931 23,035 21,896
Shop/ Office 964,441 422,785 541,656
School/ College etc. 75,480 40,290 35,190
Hotel/ Lodge/ Guest house etc. 52,509 20,656 31,853
Hospital/ Dispensary etc. 31,589 14,505 17,084
Factory/ Workshop/ Workshed etc. 165,901 74,043 91,858
Place of worship 105,562 62,057 43,505
Other non-residential use 836,057 504,376 331,681
No. of occupied locked census
houses 93,554 43,552 50,002
1313
INDIA
KERALA
Total - 33,08,35,767 (32.8%
increase)
Total – 1,12,17,853 (19.9% increase)
• Ernakulam (First) – 11,74,691
• Wayanad (Last) – 2,77,988
Vacant Census Houses – 2,46,72,968
(7.5)%)
Vacant Census Houses – 11,89,144
(10.6%)
Occupied Census Houses –
30,61,62,799 (92.5%)
Occupied Census Houses –
1,00,28,709 (89.4%)
Residence & Residence-cum-other
use –24,46,41,582 (79.9%)
Residence & Residence-cum-other
use – 77,03,616 (76.8%)
1414
Census Houses – Kerala 2011
INDIA KERALA
Total number of Census Houses used for Residence
and Residence-cum-other use – 24,46,41,582
Total number of Census Houses used for Residence
and Residence-cum-other use – 77,03,616
 Alappuzha (First) – 5,27,394 (79.3%)
 Kannur (Last) – 5,42,465 (71.3%)
Ø Good – 13,01,24,755 (53.2%) Ø Good – 51,11,677 (66.4%)
 Rural – 46.0%  Rural – 61.0%
 Urban – 68.5%  Urban – 72.4%
 Kozhikode (First) – 5,01,623 (73.5%)
 Idukki (Last) – 1,35,266 (48.9%)
Ø Livable – 10,14,41,740 (41.5%) Ø Livable – 21,86,850 (28.4%)
 Rural – 47.5%  Rural – 32.6%
 Urban – 28.6%  Urban – 23.7%
 Idukki (First) – 1,19,481 (43.2%)
 Kozhikode (Last) – 1,49,682 (21.9%)
Ø Dilapidated – 1,30,75,087 (5.3%) Ø Dilapidated – 4,05,089 (5.3%)
 Rural – 6.5%  Rural – 6.4%
 Urban – 2.9%  Urban – 3.9%
 Wayanad (First) – 16,406 (8.9%) 1515
Condition of Census Houses use as Residence and Residence cum
other use (Excluding Locked/ Vacant Houses):
Gap between Number of Households and the
Housing Stock – Kerala 1991-2011
The gap between households and housing stock is
narrowing
53.9
53.4
66.0
65.4
77.2
77.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
(InLakhs)
1991 2001 2011
Census Year
Gap in Housing Stock
Households Housing Stock
1616
Census
Year
Households
(In Lakhs)
Housing
Stock (In
Lakhs)
difference(
In Lakhs)
1991 53.9 53.4 0.5
2001 66 65.4 0.6
2011 77.2 77 0.2
Districts
1717
GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK-
TOTAL 2011
Kasaragod,
415
Wayanad, 238Thiruvananthap
uram, 3,324
Thrissur, 497
Ernakulam,
334Idukki, 170
Kottayam, -232
Alappuzha, 881
Pathanamthitta,
445
Kollam, 1,342
Malappuram,
680
Palakkad,
2,616
Kozhikode,
1,300
Kannur, 744
In absolute numbers
Kasaragod, 234
Kannur, 299
Wayanad, 230
Kozhikode, 121
Malappuram, 351
Palakkad, 1,832
Thrissur, 201
Ernakulam, -28
Idukki, 196
Kottayam, -167
Alappuzha, 448
Pathanamthitta, 333
Kollam, 406
Thiruvananthapuram,
1,695
GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK-
RURAL 2011
Districts
1818
In absolute numbers
Kasaragod, 181
Kannur, 445
Wayanad, 8
Kozhikode, 1,179
Malappuram, 329
Palakkad, 784
Thrissur, 296
Ernakulam, 362
Idukki, -26
Kottayam, -65
Alappuzha, 433
Pathanamthitta, 112
Kollam, 936
Thiruvananthapuram, 1,629
GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK - URBAN 2011
Districts 1919
In absolute numbers
2020
India/State/Union Territory
Census Houses used as Residence
and Residence cum other use
(Housing Stock)%to the occupied
census houses
INDIA 79.9
Andhra Pradesh 87.8
Karnataka 81.0
Lakshadweep 59.7
Kerala 76.8
Tamil Nadu 85.8
Housing Stock- India, Kerala & Neighbouring States 2011
• Decline in proportion of households using Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/ Wood/
Mud as material of Roof (T-7.6 %; R- 8.4 %; U -4.5 %)
• Increase in proportion of households using GI/Metal/Asbestos sheets as
a material of Roof (T- 4.7 %; R- 7.4 %; U- 2.4 %)
• Decline in proportion of households using Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/
Mud/Un burnt Brick as material of Wall (T- 15.5 %; R-15.2 %; U- 8.8 %)
• Increase in proportion of households using Burnt Brick and Stone
as a material of Wall (T- 86.6 %; R- 96.4 %; U – 9.8 %)
• Decline in proportion of households using Mud as material of floor
(T- 14.7 %; R- 14.9 %; U – 6.6 %)
HOUSING - QUALITY
Substantial improvement in Quality of Housing
2121
Quality of Census Houses used as Housing
Stock
Condition of Census House
 Condition of census house used as residence shows
improvement with 66.3% households reported having
good conditioned census houses and 28.4% households
reporting livable census house and 5.3% having
dilapidated houses.
2222
Households by Material of Roof –
Kerala 2001 - 2011
Material of roof 2001 2011
Grass/ Thatch/Bamboo/Wood/
Mud, etc
10.3 2.7
Tiles 57.1 38.3
Hand made tiles NA 3.5
Machine made tiles NA 34.8
GI/ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 4.3 9.0
Concrete 26.5 48.0
Others 1.8 2.0
HHs (in %)
2323
10.3
57.1
4.3
26.5
1.8
2.7
38.3
9
48
2
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
PercentageShare
2001 2011
Census Year
Material of Roof
Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/Wood/Mud, etc. Tiles GI/Metal/Asbestos sheets Concrete Others
Proportion
of HHs (%)
2424
Households by Material of Roof
– Kerala 2001 & 2011
Material
Rural Urban
2001 2011
Change
(pts)
2001 2011
Chang
e (pts)
Grass/Thatch/Bambo
o/Wood/Mud
11.5 3.1 -8.4 6.6 2.1 -4.5
Tiles: 59.4 43.3 -16.1 50.2 32.7 -17.5
Hand made tiles NA 3.7 - NA 3.3 -
Machine made tiles NA 39.7 - NA 29.4 -
G. I. / Metal/ Asbestos
sheets
4.8 12.2 +7.4 3.1 5.5 +2.4
Concrete 22.5 39.1 +16.6 38.2 58.0 +19.8
Others 1.8 2.3 +0.5 1.9 1.7 -0.2
HHs (in %)
2525
INDIA
KERALA
CONCRETE – 29.0% CONCRETE – 48.0% (6th
Position)
• Ernakulam (Highest) – 64.1%
• Idukki (Lowest) – 21.1%
TILE – 23.8% TILE – 38.3% (6th
Position)
• Palakkad (Highest) – 62.1%
• Thiruvananthapuram (Lowest) –
22.5%
2626
Material used for construction of Census House
used as housing stock.
· ROOF
2727
Predominant material of roof - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
India/
State/
Union
Territory
#
Distribution of households by predominant material of roof
Grass
,
Thatc
h,
Bamb
oo,
Wood,
Mud
etc.
Plasti
c,
Polyth
ene
Tiles
Brick
Stone
/slate
G.I.,M
etal,A
sbest
os
sheet
s
Concr
ete
Any
other
materi
alTotal
Hand
made
Tiles
Machi
ne
made
Tiles
INDIA 15.1 0.6 23.8 14.5 9.3 6.6 8.6 15.9 29.1 0.4
Andhra
Pradesh
15.3 0.3 17.8 6.5 11.3 0.3 5.1 11.9 48.8 0.5
Karnata
ka
11.4 0.5 34.8 9.6 25.2 0.5 8.5 16.5 27.6 0.3
Goa 1.2 0.4 56.1 3.5 52.6 0.7 1.7 6.4 33.2 0.2
Lakshad
weep # 1.8 0.1 45.0 0.3 44.7 0.1 0.3 7.7 44.9 0.2
Kerala 2.7 0.7 38.3 3.5 34.8 0.3 0.8 9.0 48.0 0.2
Tamil
Households by Material of Wall
- Kerala 2001 - 2011
Material of wallMaterial of wall 20012001 20112011
Grass/ Thatch/Bamboo, etcGrass/ Thatch/Bamboo, etc 4.94.9 1.71.7
Mud/ Un-burnt bricksMud/ Un-burnt bricks 23.823.8 11.511.5
StoneStone 33.533.5 56.956.9
Packed with mortarPacked with mortar NANA
47.447.4
Not packed with mortarNot packed with mortar NANA 9.49.4
Burnt brickBurnt brick 31.631.6 24.524.5
OthersOthers 6.26.2 5.45.4
HHs (in %)
2828
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2001 2011
4.9 1.7
23.8
11.5
33.5
56.9
31.6
24.5
6.2 5.4
PercentageShare
Census Year
Materialof Wall
Grass/Thatch/Bamboo,etc. Mud/Un-burnt bricks Stone Burnt brick Others
2929
Households by Material of Wall
– Kerala 2001 & 2011
MaterialMaterial
RuralRural UrbanUrban
20012001 20112011
ChangeChange
(%s)(%s)
20012001 20112011
ChangeChange
(%s)(%s)
Grass/Thatch/BambooGrass/Thatch/Bamboo 5.35.3 2.02.0 -3.3-3.3 3.73.7 1.31.3 -2.4-2.4
Mud/ Un-burnt bricksMud/ Un-burnt bricks 27.127.1 15.115.1 -12.0-12.0 14.014.0 7.57.5 -6.5-6.5
StoneStone 33.033.0 53.553.5 +20.5+20.5 35.035.0 60.660.6 +25.6+25.6
Packed with mortarPacked with mortar NANA 42.442.4 NANA NANA
53.253.2
NANA
Not packed withNot packed with
mortarmortar NANA
11.211.2
NANA NANA 7.47.4 NANA
Burnt brickBurnt brick 28.428.4 23.523.5 +4.9+4.9 41.441.4 25.625.6 -15.8-15.8
OthersOthers 6.26.2 5.95.9 -0.3-0.3 5.95.9 5.05.0 -0.9-0.9
HHs (in %)
3030
INDIA
KERALA
Stone & Burnt Brick – 61.7% Stone & Burnt Brick – 81.4%
 Rural – 53.6%  Rural – 77.1%
 Urban – 78.5%  Urban – 86.2%
STONE – Kozhikode (First) – 88.1%
Wayanad (Last) – 19.1%
BURNT BRICK
Wayanad (First) – 55.5%
Kozhikode (Last) – 1.1%
3131
Material used for construction of Census house used as
housing stock.
WALL
3232
India/
State/
Union Territory
#
Distribution of households by predominant material of Wall
Grass,
Thatch,
Bamboo
etc.
Plastic,
Polythe
ne
Mud,
Unburnt
brick Wood
Stone
G.I.,Metal,
Asbestos
sheets
Burnt
brick Concrete
Any other
material
INDIA 9.0 0.3 23.7 0.7 14.1 0.6 47.5 3.5 0.6
Andhra
Pradesh
5.3 0.3 15.2 0.6 27.3 0.2 48.6 2.0 0.6
Karnataka 4.0 0.2 21.7 0.6 32.1 0.4 33.9 6.9 0.3
Lakshadweep #
1.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 45.5 0.2 51.4 0.7 0.1
Kerala 1.7 0.5 11.5 0.9 56.9 0.2 24.5 2.9 1.0
Tamil Nadu 4.2 0.1 20.8 0.2 20.1 0.2 45.3 8.6 0.5
Predominant material of Wall - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
Households by Material of Floor
– Kerala 2001 & 2011
Material of floorMaterial of floor 20012001 20112011
MudMud 24.424.4 9.79.7
StoneStone 0.90.9 3.73.7
CementCement 63.163.1 61.461.4
Mosaic/ Floor tilesMosaic/ Floor tiles 9.89.8 22.922.9
OthersOthers 1.81.8 2.32.3
HHs (in %)
3333
24.4
0.9
63.1
9.8
1.8
9.7
3.7
61.4
22.9
2.3
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
PercentageShare
2001 2011Census Year
Material of Floor
Mud Stone Cement Mosaic/Floor Tiles Others
Proportion
of HHs (%)
3434
Households by Material of Floor
– Kerala 2001 & 2011
MaterialMaterial
RuralRural UrbanUrban
20012001 20112011 ChangeChange 20012001 20112011 ChangeChange
MudMud 28.628.6 13.713.7 -14.9-14.9 11.811.8 5.25.2 -6.6-6.6
StoneStone 0.90.9 2.62.6 +1.7+1.7 0.70.7 5.05.0 +4.3+4.3
CementCement 61.861.8 64.864.8 +3.0+3.0 66.766.7 57.457.4 -9.3-9.3
Mosaic/ Floor tilesMosaic/ Floor tiles 7.07.0 17.117.1 +10.1+10.1 18.118.1 29.529.5 +11.4+11.4
OthersOthers 1.71.7 1.81.8 +0.1+0.1 2.72.7 2.92.9 +0.2+0.2
HHs (in %)
3535
INDIA
KERALA
CEMENT – 31.1% CEMENT -61.4% (6th Position)
 Rural – 24.2%  Rural – 64.8%
 Urban – 45.8%  Urban – 57.4%
 Alappuzha (First) – 71.9%
 Thiruvananthapuram (Last) – 54.2%
MOSAIC/FLOOR TILES
– 10.8%
MOSAIC/FLOOR TILES – 22.9%
(7th
Position)
 Ernakulam (First) – 30.8%
 Idukki (Last) – 8.5% 3636
Material used for construction of Census house used
as housing stock.
FLOOR
3737
Predominant Material of Floor - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
HOUSING - QUALITY
• Decline in proportion of households having no exclusive
room, 1 room and 2 rooms.
• Increase in proportion of households having 3 and 4
rooms (3 rooms T – 4.9 %; R – 4.9 %; U – 4.5 % & 4 rooms
T – 2.3 %; R – 2.3 %; U – 1.4 %)
• Increase in the number of households with 1 to 4 members
and decline in households with 5 and above members
• Decrease in proportion of households with 3 and 4
Married Couples (3 Married Couples T – 0.3 %; R – 0.4; U –
0.5 %& 4 Married Couples T – 0.1 %; R – 0.1 %; U – 0.2 %)
3838
No. of rooms 2001 2011
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
No exclusive room 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.9
One room 10.9 11.6 9.1 7.3 8.1 6.3
Two rooms 26.6 27.7 23.4 25.1 26.7 23.3
Three rooms 27.3 27.1 27.9 32.2 32.0 32.4
Four rooms 18.3 17.7 20.0 20.6 20.0 21.4
Five rooms 8.3 7.9 9.6 7.9 7.2 8.6
Six rooms and above 6.9 6.2 8.9 5.8 4.8 7.0
Distribution of Households by Number of Rooms
HHs (in %)
3939
1.6
10.9
26.6
27.3
18.3
8.3
6.9
1.1
7.3
25.1
32.2
20.6
7.9
5.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
No
exclusive
room
One room Tworooms Three
rooms
Four rooms Five rooms Six rooms
and above
Percentageshare
Number of dwelling rooms
Dwelling rooms 2001&2011
2001
2011
DWELLING ROOMS 2001& 2011DWELLING ROOMS 2001& 2011
No. of rooms Rural Urban
2001 2011 Change 2001 2011 Change
No exclusive room 1.7 1.2 -0.5 1.1 0.9 -0.2
One room 11.6 8.1 -3.5 9.1 6.3 -2.8
Two rooms 27.7 26.7 -1.0 23.4 23.3 -0.1
Three rooms 27.1 32.0 +4.9 27.9 32.4 +4.5
Four rooms 17.7 20.0 +2.3 20.0 21.4 +1.4
Five rooms 7.9 7.2 -0.7 9.6 8.6 -1.0
Six rooms and above 6.2 4.8 -1.4 8.9 7.0 -1.9
Change in the Proportion of Households by
Number of Rooms - Kerala
HHs (in %)
4141
4242
INDIA
KERALA
No exclusive room – 3.9% No exclusive room – 1.1%
One room – 37.1% One room – 7.3%
Two rooms – 31.7% Two rooms – 25.1%
Three rooms – 14.5% Three rooms – 32.2%
Four rooms – 7.4% Four rooms – 20.6%
Five rooms – 2.6% Five rooms – 7.9%
Six rooms and above – 2.8% Six rooms and above – 5.8%
Households by Number of Dwelling Rooms:
Households
by Number of
Rooms (%)
1.6
10.9
26.6
27.3
18.3
8.3
6.9
1.7
11.6
27.7
27.1
17.7
7.9
6.2
1.1
9.1
23.4
27.9
20
9.6
8.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
No exclusive
room
One room Two rooms Three rooms Fourrooms Five rooms Six rooms and
above
Total Rural Urban KERALA 2001
1.1
7.3
25.1
32.2
20.6
7.9
5.8
1.2
8.1
26.7
32
20
7.2
4.8
0.9
6.3
23.3
32.4
21.4
8.6
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
No exclusive
room
Oneroom Two rooms Three rooms Fourrooms Five rooms Six rooms and
above
Total Rural Urban
KERALA 2011
4343
4444
Dwelling Rooms- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
Households by Number of Dwelling Rooms:
 In 2011, the share of households having ‘no exclusive
room’ came down to 1.1% from 1.6% in 2001. Similar
trend visible in the case of ‘one room’, ‘two rooms’,
‘five rooms’ and ‘six rooms and above’. The present
data shows that the share of households occupies ‘three
rooms’ and ‘four rooms’ are 32.2% and 20.6%
respectively
4545
Household Size
Total Rural Urban
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
1 2.8 3.7 2.9 3.9 2.5 3.4
2 6.9 10.6 7.0 10.8 6.9 10.3
3 13.1 17.3 12.9 17.1 13.6 17.6
4 29.3 30.0 29.1 29.7 30.0 30.3
5 21.1 18.6 25.8 19.0 20.1 18.1
6-8 20.3 16.2 20.6 16.3 19.5 16.0
9 + 6.4 3.7 7.3 3.2 7.4 4.2
Distribution of Households by Household Size -
Kerala HHs (in %)
4646
4747
INDIA
KERALA
6-8' = 24.9% (Highest) 4' = 30.0% (Highest)
1' = 3.7% (Lowest) Ernakulam – 34.2% (Highest)
Malappuram – 21.8% (Lowest)
9+' = 3.7% (Lowest)
Malappuram – 10.2% (Highest)
Idukki – 1.0 (Lowest)
Households by Household Size:
Households
by
Household
Size (%)
2.8
6.9
13.1
29.3
21.1
20.3
6.4
2.9
7
12.9
29.1
25.8
20.6
7.3
2.5
6.9
13.6
30
20.1
19.5
7.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 +
HH%
HH Size
Total Rural Urban KERALA 2001
3.7
10.6
17.3
30
18.6
16.2
3.7
3.9
10.8
17.1
29.7
19
16.3
3.2
3.4
10.3
17.6
30.3
18.1
16
4.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 +
HH%
HH Size
Total Rural Urban
KERALA 2011
4848
4949
India/
State/
Union Territory #
Household size
1
member
2
members
3
members
4
members
5
members
6-8
members
9+
members
INDIA 3.7 9.7 13.6 22.7 18.8 24.9 6.6
Andhra Pradesh 5.0 13.7 17.2 30.9 17.9 13.6 1.7
Karnataka 4.0 9.6 15.4 26.2 18.9 20.7 5.2
Lakshadweep #
6.1 6.3 9.0 14.7 13.7 28.7 21.7
Kerala 3.7 10.6 17.3 30.0 18.6 16.2 3.7
Tamil Nadu 5.3 13.9 19.0 30.8 17.7 12.3 1.1
Household size- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
No. of marriedNo. of married
couplescouples
TotalTotal RuralRural UrbanUrban
20012001 20112011 20012001 20112011 20012001 20112011
NoneNone 12.712.7 15.015.0 13.013.0 15.215.2 11.711.7 14.814.8
11 71.071.0 68.568.5 71.071.0 68.468.4 70.970.9 68.568.5
22 13.113.1 13.813.8 13.013.0 13.913.9 13.513.5 13.613.6
33 2.62.6 2.32.3 2.52.5 2.12.1 3.13.1 2.62.6
44 0.50.5 0.40.4 0.40.4 0.30.3 0.60.6 0.40.4
5+5+ 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.20.2 0.10.1
Number of Married Couples in a Household
HHs (in %)
5050
5151
INDIA
KERALA
1'= 70.1% (Highest) 1' = 68.5% (Highest)
5+' = 0.2% (Lowest) Idukki – 73.9% (Highest)
  Malappuram-62.3% (Lowest)
5+' = 0.1% (Lowest)
Malappuram–0.223%(Highest)
Kottayam – 0.004% (Lowest)
Households by number of Married Couples:
5252
India/
State/
Union Territory #
Households by number of married couples in the household
No married
couple
1 married
couple
2 married
couples
3 married
couples
4 married
couples
5 married
couples &
above
INDIA 11.6 70.1 14.1 3.2 0.7 0.2
Andhra Pradesh 13.4 75.8 9.5 1.1 0.1 0.0
Karnataka 13.8 70.1 12.7 2.8 0.5 0.2
Lakshadweep #
29.0 59.2 8.0 2.5 0.8 0.5
Kerala 15.0 68.5 13.8 2.3 0.4 0.1
Tamil Nadu 14.4 74.4 10.1 1.0 0.1 0.0
Number of Married Couples - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
12.7
71.0
13.1
2.6
0.5
0.1
15.0
68.5
13.8
2.3
0.4
0.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
None 1 2 3 4 5+
Percentageshare
Numberofcouples
Numberofmarriedcouples2001&2011
2001
2011
NUMBER OF MARRIED COUPLES 2001& 2011NUMBER OF MARRIED COUPLES 2001& 2011
Distribution of Households by Ownership Status-kerala
(in %)
StatusStatus 20012001 20112011
Owned
TotalTotal 92.692.6
90.790.7
RuralRural 94.394.3 92.892.8
UrbanUrban 87.587.5 88.388.3
RentedRented
TotalTotal 5.05.0 7.37.3
RuralRural 3.33.3 4.94.9
UrbanUrban 10.210.2 10.010.0
OthersOthers
TotalTotal 2.32.3 2.02.0
RuralRural 2.42.4 2.32.3
UrbanUrban 2.32.3 1.71.7
5454
5555
India/
State/
Union Territory #
Ownership Status
Owned -
households
Rented -
households
Other -
households
INDIA 86.6 11.1 2.4
Andhra Pradesh 78.5 19.7 1.8
Karnataka 74.3 23.0 2.7
Lakshadweep #
83.5 14.8 1.8
Kerala 90.7 7.3 2.0
Tamil Nadu 74.6 23.4 2.1
Ownership Status- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
5656
INDIA
KERALA
OWNED – 86.6% OWNED – 90.7% (8th
Position)
 Rural– 94.7%  Rural – 92.8%
 Urban – 69.2%  Urban - 88.3%
Alappuzha (First) – 94.0%
Idukki (Last) – 80.3%
RENTED – 11.1% RENTED – 7.3% (24th
Position)
 Rural – 3.4% Ernakulam (First) – 11.2%
 Urban – 27.5% Alappuzha (Last) – 4.7%
Households by Ownership Status:
Households by Ownership Status
 The result of Houselisting and Housing
census 2011 shows that 90.7% households
lives in their own house.
5757
Part -2 begins

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Kürzlich hochgeladen

The Ten Facts About People With Autism Presentation
The Ten Facts About People With Autism PresentationThe Ten Facts About People With Autism Presentation
The Ten Facts About People With Autism PresentationNathan Young
 
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸mathanramanathan2005
 
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...Henrik Hanke
 
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation TrackSBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation TrackSebastiano Panichella
 
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptx
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptxGenshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptx
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptxJohnree4
 
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptx
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptxEvent 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptx
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptxaryanv1753
 
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.com
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.comSaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.com
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.comsaastr
 
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...Krijn Poppe
 
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software Engineering
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software EngineeringThe 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software Engineering
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software EngineeringSebastiano Panichella
 
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...漢銘 謝
 
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptx
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptxWork Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptx
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptxmavinoikein
 
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptx
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptxAnne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptx
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptxnoorehahmad
 
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATION
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATIONRACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATION
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATIONRachelAnnTenibroAmaz
 
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Aerialist
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with AerialistSimulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Aerialist
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with AerialistSebastiano Panichella
 
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170Escort Service
 
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory affair 1st sem CRR
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory  affair 1st sem CRRINDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory  affair 1st sem CRR
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory affair 1st sem CRRsarwankumar4524
 
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck. .pptx
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck.  .pptxChizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck.  .pptx
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck. .pptxogubuikealex
 
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC - NANOTECHNOLOGY
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC  - NANOTECHNOLOGYPHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC  - NANOTECHNOLOGY
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC - NANOTECHNOLOGYpruthirajnayak525
 
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptx
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptxmiladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptx
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptxCarrieButtitta
 
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular Plastics
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular PlasticsDutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular Plastics
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular PlasticsDutch Power
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

The Ten Facts About People With Autism Presentation
The Ten Facts About People With Autism PresentationThe Ten Facts About People With Autism Presentation
The Ten Facts About People With Autism Presentation
 
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸
Mathan flower ppt.pptx slide orchids ✨🌸
 
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...
DGT @ CTAC 2024 Valencia: Most crucial invest to digitalisation_Sven Zoelle_v...
 
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation TrackSBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
 
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptx
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptxGenshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptx
Genshin Impact PPT Template by EaTemp.pptx
 
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptx
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptxEvent 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptx
Event 4 Introduction to Open Source.pptx
 
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.com
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.comSaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.com
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Kyle Norton, Owner.com
 
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...
Presentation for the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture, Brussel...
 
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software Engineering
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software EngineeringThe 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software Engineering
The 3rd Intl. Workshop on NL-based Software Engineering
 
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...
THE COUNTRY WHO SOLVED THE WORLD_HOW CHINA LAUNCHED THE CIVILIZATION REVOLUTI...
 
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptx
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptxWork Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptx
Work Remotely with Confluence ACE 2.pptx
 
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptx
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptxAnne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptx
Anne Frank A Beacon of Hope amidst darkness ppt.pptx
 
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATION
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATIONRACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATION
RACHEL-ANN M. TENIBRO PRODUCT RESEARCH PRESENTATION
 
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Aerialist
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with AerialistSimulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Aerialist
Simulation-based Testing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Aerialist
 
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170
Call Girls In Aerocity 🤳 Call Us +919599264170
 
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory affair 1st sem CRR
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory  affair 1st sem CRRINDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory  affair 1st sem CRR
INDIAN GCP GUIDELINE. for Regulatory affair 1st sem CRR
 
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck. .pptx
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck.  .pptxChizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck.  .pptx
Chizaram's Women Tech Makers Deck. .pptx
 
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC - NANOTECHNOLOGY
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC  - NANOTECHNOLOGYPHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC  - NANOTECHNOLOGY
PHYSICS PROJECT BY MSC - NANOTECHNOLOGY
 
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptx
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptxmiladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptx
miladyskindiseases-200705210221 2.!!pptx
 
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular Plastics
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular PlasticsDutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular Plastics
Dutch Power - 26 maart 2024 - Henk Kras - Circular Plastics
 

Empfohlen

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTExpeed Software
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 

Empfohlen (20)

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 

Housing, Household Amenities and Assets - Data Highlights from Census 2011

  • 1. 11
  • 2. Housing, Household Amenities and AssetsHousing, Household Amenities and Assets - Data Highlights from Census 2011- Data Highlights from Census 2011 CENSUS AND NPR SECTION DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS,KERALA 22
  • 3. HOUSELISTING & HOUSING CENSUS 2010- Census 2011 Objective  Prepare an unambiguous frame for Population Enumeration  Collect data on housing, amenities and assets Carried out during April- May 2010 33
  • 4. Image based Recognition (ICR) Manual completion of unrecognized characters Census 2011 ProcessCensus 2011 Process Scanning Database/ Tabulation Data Dissemination Image validation 44
  • 5. DATA COLLECTIONDATA COLLECTION  35 items of information collected35 items of information collected  ICR technology used for dataICR technology used for data processingprocessing  Houselisting and HousingHouselisting and Housing Census excluded houselessCensus excluded houseless households.households. The data on amenities and assets covers normal households only and excludes Institutional households 55
  • 8. • Use of Census Houses • Housing stock • Construction material • Number of dwelling rooms • Household size • Number of married couples in a household Coverage: 88
  • 9. Total number of Census Houses increased 19.9% in Kerala. There are 1,12,17,853 Census Houses in Kerala. Number of Occupied Census Houses is 89.4%. Residence and Residence cum other use is 68.7%. HOUSING - QUANTITY 99
  • 10. Census Houses – Kerala 2011 Census Houses Total Rural Urban Total 1,12,17,853 58,57,785 53,60,068 Occupied 1,00,28,709 52,71,787 47,56,922 Residential 76,58,685 40,66,488 35,92,197 Residential-cum-other uses 44,931 23,035 21,896 Non-residential 22,31,539 11,38,712 10,92,827 Vacant 11,89,144 5,85,998 6,03,146 Number of households 77,16,370 40,95,674 36,20,696 1010
  • 11. Census Houses Total Rural Urban Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 Occupied 89.4 90.0 88.7 Residential 76.4 77.1 75.5 Residential-cum-other uses 0.4 0.4 0.5 Non-residential 22.3 21.6 23.0 Vacant 10.6 10.0 11.3 Number of households 100.0 53.1 46.9 Census Houses – Kerala 2011 Percentage share 1111
  • 12. Census House Total Rural Urban Abs % Abs % Abs % Number of census houses 18.6 19.9 -10.3 -15.0 29.0 117.7 Occupied census houses 14.0 16.3 -11.1 -17.5 25.2 112.5 Used as residence 11.7 18.0 -8.0 -16.5 19.7 121.8 Used as residence-cum- other use -0.05 -9.4 -0.1 -31.9 0.06 38.8 Housing stock 11.6 17.8 -8.2 -16.6 19.8 121.0 (In lakhs) Variation in the Number of Census Houses – Kerala 2001 & 2011 • 18.6 lakhs Census Houses added in 2001-11 • Largest addition in Malappuram (2.9 lakhs); followed by Kozhikode (2.0 lakhs), Thrissur (1.9 lakhs) 1212
  • 13. Use of Occupied Census Houses Kerala : 2011 Houselist Item Absolute number Total Rural Urban Total number of occupied census houses 10,028,709 5,271,787 4,756,922 Occupied Census Houses used as Residence 7,658,685 4,066,488 3,592,197 Residence -cum- other use 44,931 23,035 21,896 Shop/ Office 964,441 422,785 541,656 School/ College etc. 75,480 40,290 35,190 Hotel/ Lodge/ Guest house etc. 52,509 20,656 31,853 Hospital/ Dispensary etc. 31,589 14,505 17,084 Factory/ Workshop/ Workshed etc. 165,901 74,043 91,858 Place of worship 105,562 62,057 43,505 Other non-residential use 836,057 504,376 331,681 No. of occupied locked census houses 93,554 43,552 50,002 1313
  • 14. INDIA KERALA Total - 33,08,35,767 (32.8% increase) Total – 1,12,17,853 (19.9% increase) • Ernakulam (First) – 11,74,691 • Wayanad (Last) – 2,77,988 Vacant Census Houses – 2,46,72,968 (7.5)%) Vacant Census Houses – 11,89,144 (10.6%) Occupied Census Houses – 30,61,62,799 (92.5%) Occupied Census Houses – 1,00,28,709 (89.4%) Residence & Residence-cum-other use –24,46,41,582 (79.9%) Residence & Residence-cum-other use – 77,03,616 (76.8%) 1414 Census Houses – Kerala 2011
  • 15. INDIA KERALA Total number of Census Houses used for Residence and Residence-cum-other use – 24,46,41,582 Total number of Census Houses used for Residence and Residence-cum-other use – 77,03,616  Alappuzha (First) – 5,27,394 (79.3%)  Kannur (Last) – 5,42,465 (71.3%) Ø Good – 13,01,24,755 (53.2%) Ø Good – 51,11,677 (66.4%)  Rural – 46.0%  Rural – 61.0%  Urban – 68.5%  Urban – 72.4%  Kozhikode (First) – 5,01,623 (73.5%)  Idukki (Last) – 1,35,266 (48.9%) Ø Livable – 10,14,41,740 (41.5%) Ø Livable – 21,86,850 (28.4%)  Rural – 47.5%  Rural – 32.6%  Urban – 28.6%  Urban – 23.7%  Idukki (First) – 1,19,481 (43.2%)  Kozhikode (Last) – 1,49,682 (21.9%) Ø Dilapidated – 1,30,75,087 (5.3%) Ø Dilapidated – 4,05,089 (5.3%)  Rural – 6.5%  Rural – 6.4%  Urban – 2.9%  Urban – 3.9%  Wayanad (First) – 16,406 (8.9%) 1515 Condition of Census Houses use as Residence and Residence cum other use (Excluding Locked/ Vacant Houses):
  • 16. Gap between Number of Households and the Housing Stock – Kerala 1991-2011 The gap between households and housing stock is narrowing 53.9 53.4 66.0 65.4 77.2 77.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (InLakhs) 1991 2001 2011 Census Year Gap in Housing Stock Households Housing Stock 1616 Census Year Households (In Lakhs) Housing Stock (In Lakhs) difference( In Lakhs) 1991 53.9 53.4 0.5 2001 66 65.4 0.6 2011 77.2 77 0.2
  • 17. Districts 1717 GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK- TOTAL 2011 Kasaragod, 415 Wayanad, 238Thiruvananthap uram, 3,324 Thrissur, 497 Ernakulam, 334Idukki, 170 Kottayam, -232 Alappuzha, 881 Pathanamthitta, 445 Kollam, 1,342 Malappuram, 680 Palakkad, 2,616 Kozhikode, 1,300 Kannur, 744 In absolute numbers
  • 18. Kasaragod, 234 Kannur, 299 Wayanad, 230 Kozhikode, 121 Malappuram, 351 Palakkad, 1,832 Thrissur, 201 Ernakulam, -28 Idukki, 196 Kottayam, -167 Alappuzha, 448 Pathanamthitta, 333 Kollam, 406 Thiruvananthapuram, 1,695 GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK- RURAL 2011 Districts 1818 In absolute numbers
  • 19. Kasaragod, 181 Kannur, 445 Wayanad, 8 Kozhikode, 1,179 Malappuram, 329 Palakkad, 784 Thrissur, 296 Ernakulam, 362 Idukki, -26 Kottayam, -65 Alappuzha, 433 Pathanamthitta, 112 Kollam, 936 Thiruvananthapuram, 1,629 GAP BETWEEN NO. OF HH AND THE HOUSING STOCK - URBAN 2011 Districts 1919 In absolute numbers
  • 20. 2020 India/State/Union Territory Census Houses used as Residence and Residence cum other use (Housing Stock)%to the occupied census houses INDIA 79.9 Andhra Pradesh 87.8 Karnataka 81.0 Lakshadweep 59.7 Kerala 76.8 Tamil Nadu 85.8 Housing Stock- India, Kerala & Neighbouring States 2011
  • 21. • Decline in proportion of households using Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/ Wood/ Mud as material of Roof (T-7.6 %; R- 8.4 %; U -4.5 %) • Increase in proportion of households using GI/Metal/Asbestos sheets as a material of Roof (T- 4.7 %; R- 7.4 %; U- 2.4 %) • Decline in proportion of households using Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/ Mud/Un burnt Brick as material of Wall (T- 15.5 %; R-15.2 %; U- 8.8 %) • Increase in proportion of households using Burnt Brick and Stone as a material of Wall (T- 86.6 %; R- 96.4 %; U – 9.8 %) • Decline in proportion of households using Mud as material of floor (T- 14.7 %; R- 14.9 %; U – 6.6 %) HOUSING - QUALITY Substantial improvement in Quality of Housing 2121
  • 22. Quality of Census Houses used as Housing Stock Condition of Census House  Condition of census house used as residence shows improvement with 66.3% households reported having good conditioned census houses and 28.4% households reporting livable census house and 5.3% having dilapidated houses. 2222
  • 23. Households by Material of Roof – Kerala 2001 - 2011 Material of roof 2001 2011 Grass/ Thatch/Bamboo/Wood/ Mud, etc 10.3 2.7 Tiles 57.1 38.3 Hand made tiles NA 3.5 Machine made tiles NA 34.8 GI/ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 4.3 9.0 Concrete 26.5 48.0 Others 1.8 2.0 HHs (in %) 2323
  • 24. 10.3 57.1 4.3 26.5 1.8 2.7 38.3 9 48 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% PercentageShare 2001 2011 Census Year Material of Roof Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/Wood/Mud, etc. Tiles GI/Metal/Asbestos sheets Concrete Others Proportion of HHs (%) 2424
  • 25. Households by Material of Roof – Kerala 2001 & 2011 Material Rural Urban 2001 2011 Change (pts) 2001 2011 Chang e (pts) Grass/Thatch/Bambo o/Wood/Mud 11.5 3.1 -8.4 6.6 2.1 -4.5 Tiles: 59.4 43.3 -16.1 50.2 32.7 -17.5 Hand made tiles NA 3.7 - NA 3.3 - Machine made tiles NA 39.7 - NA 29.4 - G. I. / Metal/ Asbestos sheets 4.8 12.2 +7.4 3.1 5.5 +2.4 Concrete 22.5 39.1 +16.6 38.2 58.0 +19.8 Others 1.8 2.3 +0.5 1.9 1.7 -0.2 HHs (in %) 2525
  • 26. INDIA KERALA CONCRETE – 29.0% CONCRETE – 48.0% (6th Position) • Ernakulam (Highest) – 64.1% • Idukki (Lowest) – 21.1% TILE – 23.8% TILE – 38.3% (6th Position) • Palakkad (Highest) – 62.1% • Thiruvananthapuram (Lowest) – 22.5% 2626 Material used for construction of Census House used as housing stock. · ROOF
  • 27. 2727 Predominant material of roof - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011 India/ State/ Union Territory # Distribution of households by predominant material of roof Grass , Thatc h, Bamb oo, Wood, Mud etc. Plasti c, Polyth ene Tiles Brick Stone /slate G.I.,M etal,A sbest os sheet s Concr ete Any other materi alTotal Hand made Tiles Machi ne made Tiles INDIA 15.1 0.6 23.8 14.5 9.3 6.6 8.6 15.9 29.1 0.4 Andhra Pradesh 15.3 0.3 17.8 6.5 11.3 0.3 5.1 11.9 48.8 0.5 Karnata ka 11.4 0.5 34.8 9.6 25.2 0.5 8.5 16.5 27.6 0.3 Goa 1.2 0.4 56.1 3.5 52.6 0.7 1.7 6.4 33.2 0.2 Lakshad weep # 1.8 0.1 45.0 0.3 44.7 0.1 0.3 7.7 44.9 0.2 Kerala 2.7 0.7 38.3 3.5 34.8 0.3 0.8 9.0 48.0 0.2 Tamil
  • 28. Households by Material of Wall - Kerala 2001 - 2011 Material of wallMaterial of wall 20012001 20112011 Grass/ Thatch/Bamboo, etcGrass/ Thatch/Bamboo, etc 4.94.9 1.71.7 Mud/ Un-burnt bricksMud/ Un-burnt bricks 23.823.8 11.511.5 StoneStone 33.533.5 56.956.9 Packed with mortarPacked with mortar NANA 47.447.4 Not packed with mortarNot packed with mortar NANA 9.49.4 Burnt brickBurnt brick 31.631.6 24.524.5 OthersOthers 6.26.2 5.45.4 HHs (in %) 2828
  • 29. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2001 2011 4.9 1.7 23.8 11.5 33.5 56.9 31.6 24.5 6.2 5.4 PercentageShare Census Year Materialof Wall Grass/Thatch/Bamboo,etc. Mud/Un-burnt bricks Stone Burnt brick Others 2929
  • 30. Households by Material of Wall – Kerala 2001 & 2011 MaterialMaterial RuralRural UrbanUrban 20012001 20112011 ChangeChange (%s)(%s) 20012001 20112011 ChangeChange (%s)(%s) Grass/Thatch/BambooGrass/Thatch/Bamboo 5.35.3 2.02.0 -3.3-3.3 3.73.7 1.31.3 -2.4-2.4 Mud/ Un-burnt bricksMud/ Un-burnt bricks 27.127.1 15.115.1 -12.0-12.0 14.014.0 7.57.5 -6.5-6.5 StoneStone 33.033.0 53.553.5 +20.5+20.5 35.035.0 60.660.6 +25.6+25.6 Packed with mortarPacked with mortar NANA 42.442.4 NANA NANA 53.253.2 NANA Not packed withNot packed with mortarmortar NANA 11.211.2 NANA NANA 7.47.4 NANA Burnt brickBurnt brick 28.428.4 23.523.5 +4.9+4.9 41.441.4 25.625.6 -15.8-15.8 OthersOthers 6.26.2 5.95.9 -0.3-0.3 5.95.9 5.05.0 -0.9-0.9 HHs (in %) 3030
  • 31. INDIA KERALA Stone & Burnt Brick – 61.7% Stone & Burnt Brick – 81.4%  Rural – 53.6%  Rural – 77.1%  Urban – 78.5%  Urban – 86.2% STONE – Kozhikode (First) – 88.1% Wayanad (Last) – 19.1% BURNT BRICK Wayanad (First) – 55.5% Kozhikode (Last) – 1.1% 3131 Material used for construction of Census house used as housing stock. WALL
  • 32. 3232 India/ State/ Union Territory # Distribution of households by predominant material of Wall Grass, Thatch, Bamboo etc. Plastic, Polythe ne Mud, Unburnt brick Wood Stone G.I.,Metal, Asbestos sheets Burnt brick Concrete Any other material INDIA 9.0 0.3 23.7 0.7 14.1 0.6 47.5 3.5 0.6 Andhra Pradesh 5.3 0.3 15.2 0.6 27.3 0.2 48.6 2.0 0.6 Karnataka 4.0 0.2 21.7 0.6 32.1 0.4 33.9 6.9 0.3 Lakshadweep # 1.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 45.5 0.2 51.4 0.7 0.1 Kerala 1.7 0.5 11.5 0.9 56.9 0.2 24.5 2.9 1.0 Tamil Nadu 4.2 0.1 20.8 0.2 20.1 0.2 45.3 8.6 0.5 Predominant material of Wall - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 33. Households by Material of Floor – Kerala 2001 & 2011 Material of floorMaterial of floor 20012001 20112011 MudMud 24.424.4 9.79.7 StoneStone 0.90.9 3.73.7 CementCement 63.163.1 61.461.4 Mosaic/ Floor tilesMosaic/ Floor tiles 9.89.8 22.922.9 OthersOthers 1.81.8 2.32.3 HHs (in %) 3333
  • 34. 24.4 0.9 63.1 9.8 1.8 9.7 3.7 61.4 22.9 2.3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% PercentageShare 2001 2011Census Year Material of Floor Mud Stone Cement Mosaic/Floor Tiles Others Proportion of HHs (%) 3434
  • 35. Households by Material of Floor – Kerala 2001 & 2011 MaterialMaterial RuralRural UrbanUrban 20012001 20112011 ChangeChange 20012001 20112011 ChangeChange MudMud 28.628.6 13.713.7 -14.9-14.9 11.811.8 5.25.2 -6.6-6.6 StoneStone 0.90.9 2.62.6 +1.7+1.7 0.70.7 5.05.0 +4.3+4.3 CementCement 61.861.8 64.864.8 +3.0+3.0 66.766.7 57.457.4 -9.3-9.3 Mosaic/ Floor tilesMosaic/ Floor tiles 7.07.0 17.117.1 +10.1+10.1 18.118.1 29.529.5 +11.4+11.4 OthersOthers 1.71.7 1.81.8 +0.1+0.1 2.72.7 2.92.9 +0.2+0.2 HHs (in %) 3535
  • 36. INDIA KERALA CEMENT – 31.1% CEMENT -61.4% (6th Position)  Rural – 24.2%  Rural – 64.8%  Urban – 45.8%  Urban – 57.4%  Alappuzha (First) – 71.9%  Thiruvananthapuram (Last) – 54.2% MOSAIC/FLOOR TILES – 10.8% MOSAIC/FLOOR TILES – 22.9% (7th Position)  Ernakulam (First) – 30.8%  Idukki (Last) – 8.5% 3636 Material used for construction of Census house used as housing stock. FLOOR
  • 37. 3737 Predominant Material of Floor - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 38. HOUSING - QUALITY • Decline in proportion of households having no exclusive room, 1 room and 2 rooms. • Increase in proportion of households having 3 and 4 rooms (3 rooms T – 4.9 %; R – 4.9 %; U – 4.5 % & 4 rooms T – 2.3 %; R – 2.3 %; U – 1.4 %) • Increase in the number of households with 1 to 4 members and decline in households with 5 and above members • Decrease in proportion of households with 3 and 4 Married Couples (3 Married Couples T – 0.3 %; R – 0.4; U – 0.5 %& 4 Married Couples T – 0.1 %; R – 0.1 %; U – 0.2 %) 3838
  • 39. No. of rooms 2001 2011 Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban No exclusive room 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.9 One room 10.9 11.6 9.1 7.3 8.1 6.3 Two rooms 26.6 27.7 23.4 25.1 26.7 23.3 Three rooms 27.3 27.1 27.9 32.2 32.0 32.4 Four rooms 18.3 17.7 20.0 20.6 20.0 21.4 Five rooms 8.3 7.9 9.6 7.9 7.2 8.6 Six rooms and above 6.9 6.2 8.9 5.8 4.8 7.0 Distribution of Households by Number of Rooms HHs (in %) 3939
  • 40. 1.6 10.9 26.6 27.3 18.3 8.3 6.9 1.1 7.3 25.1 32.2 20.6 7.9 5.8 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 No exclusive room One room Tworooms Three rooms Four rooms Five rooms Six rooms and above Percentageshare Number of dwelling rooms Dwelling rooms 2001&2011 2001 2011 DWELLING ROOMS 2001& 2011DWELLING ROOMS 2001& 2011
  • 41. No. of rooms Rural Urban 2001 2011 Change 2001 2011 Change No exclusive room 1.7 1.2 -0.5 1.1 0.9 -0.2 One room 11.6 8.1 -3.5 9.1 6.3 -2.8 Two rooms 27.7 26.7 -1.0 23.4 23.3 -0.1 Three rooms 27.1 32.0 +4.9 27.9 32.4 +4.5 Four rooms 17.7 20.0 +2.3 20.0 21.4 +1.4 Five rooms 7.9 7.2 -0.7 9.6 8.6 -1.0 Six rooms and above 6.2 4.8 -1.4 8.9 7.0 -1.9 Change in the Proportion of Households by Number of Rooms - Kerala HHs (in %) 4141
  • 42. 4242 INDIA KERALA No exclusive room – 3.9% No exclusive room – 1.1% One room – 37.1% One room – 7.3% Two rooms – 31.7% Two rooms – 25.1% Three rooms – 14.5% Three rooms – 32.2% Four rooms – 7.4% Four rooms – 20.6% Five rooms – 2.6% Five rooms – 7.9% Six rooms and above – 2.8% Six rooms and above – 5.8% Households by Number of Dwelling Rooms:
  • 43. Households by Number of Rooms (%) 1.6 10.9 26.6 27.3 18.3 8.3 6.9 1.7 11.6 27.7 27.1 17.7 7.9 6.2 1.1 9.1 23.4 27.9 20 9.6 8.9 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 No exclusive room One room Two rooms Three rooms Fourrooms Five rooms Six rooms and above Total Rural Urban KERALA 2001 1.1 7.3 25.1 32.2 20.6 7.9 5.8 1.2 8.1 26.7 32 20 7.2 4.8 0.9 6.3 23.3 32.4 21.4 8.6 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 No exclusive room Oneroom Two rooms Three rooms Fourrooms Five rooms Six rooms and above Total Rural Urban KERALA 2011 4343
  • 44. 4444 Dwelling Rooms- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 45. Households by Number of Dwelling Rooms:  In 2011, the share of households having ‘no exclusive room’ came down to 1.1% from 1.6% in 2001. Similar trend visible in the case of ‘one room’, ‘two rooms’, ‘five rooms’ and ‘six rooms and above’. The present data shows that the share of households occupies ‘three rooms’ and ‘four rooms’ are 32.2% and 20.6% respectively 4545
  • 46. Household Size Total Rural Urban 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 1 2.8 3.7 2.9 3.9 2.5 3.4 2 6.9 10.6 7.0 10.8 6.9 10.3 3 13.1 17.3 12.9 17.1 13.6 17.6 4 29.3 30.0 29.1 29.7 30.0 30.3 5 21.1 18.6 25.8 19.0 20.1 18.1 6-8 20.3 16.2 20.6 16.3 19.5 16.0 9 + 6.4 3.7 7.3 3.2 7.4 4.2 Distribution of Households by Household Size - Kerala HHs (in %) 4646
  • 47. 4747 INDIA KERALA 6-8' = 24.9% (Highest) 4' = 30.0% (Highest) 1' = 3.7% (Lowest) Ernakulam – 34.2% (Highest) Malappuram – 21.8% (Lowest) 9+' = 3.7% (Lowest) Malappuram – 10.2% (Highest) Idukki – 1.0 (Lowest) Households by Household Size:
  • 48. Households by Household Size (%) 2.8 6.9 13.1 29.3 21.1 20.3 6.4 2.9 7 12.9 29.1 25.8 20.6 7.3 2.5 6.9 13.6 30 20.1 19.5 7.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 + HH% HH Size Total Rural Urban KERALA 2001 3.7 10.6 17.3 30 18.6 16.2 3.7 3.9 10.8 17.1 29.7 19 16.3 3.2 3.4 10.3 17.6 30.3 18.1 16 4.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9 + HH% HH Size Total Rural Urban KERALA 2011 4848
  • 49. 4949 India/ State/ Union Territory # Household size 1 member 2 members 3 members 4 members 5 members 6-8 members 9+ members INDIA 3.7 9.7 13.6 22.7 18.8 24.9 6.6 Andhra Pradesh 5.0 13.7 17.2 30.9 17.9 13.6 1.7 Karnataka 4.0 9.6 15.4 26.2 18.9 20.7 5.2 Lakshadweep # 6.1 6.3 9.0 14.7 13.7 28.7 21.7 Kerala 3.7 10.6 17.3 30.0 18.6 16.2 3.7 Tamil Nadu 5.3 13.9 19.0 30.8 17.7 12.3 1.1 Household size- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 50. No. of marriedNo. of married couplescouples TotalTotal RuralRural UrbanUrban 20012001 20112011 20012001 20112011 20012001 20112011 NoneNone 12.712.7 15.015.0 13.013.0 15.215.2 11.711.7 14.814.8 11 71.071.0 68.568.5 71.071.0 68.468.4 70.970.9 68.568.5 22 13.113.1 13.813.8 13.013.0 13.913.9 13.513.5 13.613.6 33 2.62.6 2.32.3 2.52.5 2.12.1 3.13.1 2.62.6 44 0.50.5 0.40.4 0.40.4 0.30.3 0.60.6 0.40.4 5+5+ 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.20.2 0.10.1 Number of Married Couples in a Household HHs (in %) 5050
  • 51. 5151 INDIA KERALA 1'= 70.1% (Highest) 1' = 68.5% (Highest) 5+' = 0.2% (Lowest) Idukki – 73.9% (Highest)   Malappuram-62.3% (Lowest) 5+' = 0.1% (Lowest) Malappuram–0.223%(Highest) Kottayam – 0.004% (Lowest) Households by number of Married Couples:
  • 52. 5252 India/ State/ Union Territory # Households by number of married couples in the household No married couple 1 married couple 2 married couples 3 married couples 4 married couples 5 married couples & above INDIA 11.6 70.1 14.1 3.2 0.7 0.2 Andhra Pradesh 13.4 75.8 9.5 1.1 0.1 0.0 Karnataka 13.8 70.1 12.7 2.8 0.5 0.2 Lakshadweep # 29.0 59.2 8.0 2.5 0.8 0.5 Kerala 15.0 68.5 13.8 2.3 0.4 0.1 Tamil Nadu 14.4 74.4 10.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 Number of Married Couples - India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 53. 12.7 71.0 13.1 2.6 0.5 0.1 15.0 68.5 13.8 2.3 0.4 0.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 None 1 2 3 4 5+ Percentageshare Numberofcouples Numberofmarriedcouples2001&2011 2001 2011 NUMBER OF MARRIED COUPLES 2001& 2011NUMBER OF MARRIED COUPLES 2001& 2011
  • 54. Distribution of Households by Ownership Status-kerala (in %) StatusStatus 20012001 20112011 Owned TotalTotal 92.692.6 90.790.7 RuralRural 94.394.3 92.892.8 UrbanUrban 87.587.5 88.388.3 RentedRented TotalTotal 5.05.0 7.37.3 RuralRural 3.33.3 4.94.9 UrbanUrban 10.210.2 10.010.0 OthersOthers TotalTotal 2.32.3 2.02.0 RuralRural 2.42.4 2.32.3 UrbanUrban 2.32.3 1.71.7 5454
  • 55. 5555 India/ State/ Union Territory # Ownership Status Owned - households Rented - households Other - households INDIA 86.6 11.1 2.4 Andhra Pradesh 78.5 19.7 1.8 Karnataka 74.3 23.0 2.7 Lakshadweep # 83.5 14.8 1.8 Kerala 90.7 7.3 2.0 Tamil Nadu 74.6 23.4 2.1 Ownership Status- India, Kerala, Neighbouring States 2011
  • 56. 5656 INDIA KERALA OWNED – 86.6% OWNED – 90.7% (8th Position)  Rural– 94.7%  Rural – 92.8%  Urban – 69.2%  Urban - 88.3% Alappuzha (First) – 94.0% Idukki (Last) – 80.3% RENTED – 11.1% RENTED – 7.3% (24th Position)  Rural – 3.4% Ernakulam (First) – 11.2%  Urban – 27.5% Alappuzha (Last) – 4.7% Households by Ownership Status:
  • 57. Households by Ownership Status  The result of Houselisting and Housing census 2011 shows that 90.7% households lives in their own house. 5757