Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Artificial intelligence - Digital Readiness.

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Nächste SlideShare
A Stranger in a Strange Land
A Stranger in a Strange Land
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 28 Anzeige

Artificial intelligence - Digital Readiness.

Inspirational talk on AI (artificial intelligence) and machine learning, i.e., how to give birth to an AI. Introductory and intentionally kept simple for non experts and non technical executives. Care should be taken not too over interpret some of the intentional simplified statements in the presentation.

Inspirational talk on AI (artificial intelligence) and machine learning, i.e., how to give birth to an AI. Introductory and intentionally kept simple for non experts and non technical executives. Care should be taken not too over interpret some of the intentional simplified statements in the presentation.

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Andere mochten auch (20)

Anzeige

Ähnlich wie Artificial intelligence - Digital Readiness. (20)

Weitere von Dr. Kim (Kyllesbech Larsen) (11)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Artificial intelligence - Digital Readiness.

  1. 1. Artificial Intelligence Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Group Technology, Deutsche Telekom. Digital Readiness Campus Mönchengladbach, Germany. September 5th, 2016
  2. 2. 2 “People worry that Computers will get too smart and take over the world, but the real problem is that they're too stupid and they've already taken over the world.” Pedro Domingos, Author of “The Master Algorithm” Quiz  Who are they referring to? A. People or B. Computers “An illustration of a Winograd Schema”
  3. 3. 3 TERMINATOR RAIN MAN GOD(like)
  4. 4. 4 AI Related Do note that AI is not mentioned explicitly!
  5. 5. 5 Reference: (*) Interesting discussion with refs https://www.quora.com/Roughly-what-processing-power-does-the-human- brain-equate-to ,
  6. 6. 6 Reference: (*) Interesting discussion with refs https://www.quora.com/Roughly-what-processing-power-does-the-human- brain-equate-to ,
  7. 7. 7 1 0 Reference:David Silver etal.,“Mastering thegameofGo with deepneural networksand treesearch”, Nature (2016). Machine Man GO
  8. 8. NARROW AI Weak AI Today ~100% of use cases Ex Machina (2015) GENERAL AI Strong AI (WIP:-)
  9. 9. 9 Future Work
  10. 10. 10 45+ percent of American jobs are at high risk of being taken over by A.I. & Robotics within the Next Decade or two. Carl BenediktFrey& MichaelA. Osborne,“TheFutureof Employment”, Oxford Martin Programme on TechnologyandEmployment(2013). By 2025ish! This is only from exploiting Narrow AI “low-hanging fruits” (i.e., God-like AIs not considered)
  11. 11. 11 “The town councilors refused to give the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence.” Question Who feared violence? AI’s are not good at common sense! Common sense reasoning – the Winograd Schema Challenge. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/winograd-schema- challenge-results-ai-common-sense-still-a-problem-for-now  Answer A: the town councilors  Answer B: the demonstrators “A better Turing Test”
  12. 12. 12 Chatbots … http://www.fastcompany.com/3059439/why-the-new-chatbot-invasion-is-so-different-from-its-predecessors http://www.meemim.com/2016/08/17/chat-bots-new-craze-unlikely-live-hype/, https://chatbotsmagazine.com/when-is-a-i- really-useful-in-chatbots-7a3e64c41aa8#.moewpofei http://www.kurzweilai.net/ask-ray-response-to-announcement-of-chatbot-eugene-goostman-passing-the-turing-test TINKA: T-Mobiles Interaktive Neue Kommunikations-Assistentin IPSoft
  13. 13. 13 Chatbots … “Good” Bots. Illustrations Source: https://www.tkxel.com/blog/future-of-chatbots/
  14. 14. 14 Chatbots ... “Evil” Bad Bots! When you learn from the worst! (Illustration) Must reads: Roman V. Yampolskiy, “Taxonomy of Pathways to Dangerous AI”; http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03246v2.pdf, When IBM Watson went to the Dark Side; http://www.ibtimes.com/ibms- watson-gets-swear-filter-after-learning-urban-dictionary-1007734, Microsoft Tay goes very Dark Side; http://www.techrepublic.com/article/why-microsofts-tay-ai-bot-went-wrong/
  15. 15. 15 Baby-bot Mainly Id driven No SuperEgo Mature-bot Well balanced Ego Reinforcement learning … How to raise your bot to be a model “citizen”. Many many Conversations Learn what is Good & Bad behaviour The Perfect Customer Experience Agent Teach you Bot not only what is Good/Right, but also what is Bad/Wrong.
  16. 16. 16 Augmented Humans. Its not about competition but collaboration! http://biomech.media.mit.edu/#/ The Future of Brain Implants: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000142405 2702304914904579435592981780528 http://www.thefoodrush.com/blog/rob ot-chef-replace-us-kitchen/ http://www.computationallegalstudies.com/ http://www.wired.com/2014/06/ai-healthcare/ https://www.rt.com/uk/ 346920-robot-worker- artificial-intelligence/
  17. 17. 17 Supervised Learning. A.I. Learning Principles. "10,000-Hour Rule“ The key to achieving world class expertise in any skill, is, to a large extent, a matter of practicing the correct way, for a total of around 10,000 hours. Malcolm Gladwell, “Outliers” (2008). Unsupervised Learning. The A.I. “Holy Grail” The Default Approach
  18. 18. 18 BIG DATA required! The AI quality relates directly to the amount of data available …
  19. 19. 19 Supervised learning. Customer satisfaction illustration. Id Age Postpaid $Spend Network Out Network In Objective UX Index Main location … Actual Happiness 123…76 18 0 $10 10 2 -5 (lat, lon) … -2 235…96 38 0 $25 10 15 +2 (lat, lon) … +2 578..00 28 1 $40 15 25 +4 (lat, lon) … +5 . . . 710…13 49 1 $40 8 5 +1 (lat, lon) … -1 Starting point! I have known data & known outcome (e.g., happiness). Parameter of interest Predicted Happiness -2 -1 +5 +2 Features or Classifiers Treat customer as Happy – However this is False (positive) Treat customer as Un-Happy – However this is False (Negative)
  20. 20. 20 Teaching the A.I. “Clean” Data “Relevant” Features Your Model Quality Requirements (of Model) Some Math  PRODUCT MODEL New Data Creation Process. Actual Result Predicted Result
  21. 21. 21 A bunch of undefined pictures (Training data) Find Structure / Similarity (Model) Category F Category C PRODUCT MODEL Unsupervised learning. Category C False Positive New Picture
  22. 22. 22 AI Quality Metrics. You can be very accurate and precisely wrong! PREDICTED OUTCOME POSITIVE NEGATIVE ACTUAL OUTCOME POSITIVE TRUE POSITIVE FALSE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE FALSE POSITIVE TRUE NEGATIVE PRECISION = #TRUE POSITIVES #TRUE POSITIVES + #FALSE POSITIVES RECALL = #TRUE POSITIVES #TRUE POSITIVES + #FALSE NEGATIVES Can be very costly Can be very costly ACCURACY = #TRUE POSITIVES + #TRUE NEGATIVES ALL DATA POINTS How often a model predicted positive event is correct. How confident we can be that model predicts correctly a positive event
  23. 23. 23 Highly accurate & precisely wrong! Example of how (not) to find the terrorist? 1 person in 15,000 is a terrorist (e.g., out of all Muslims) My (naive) model: All people are non-terrorist. TRUE FALSE TRUE 0 1 FALSE 0 14,999 ACCURACY = 99.99% PRECISION = 0% RECALL = 0% BOOM! False comfort! Predicted Actual It is possible to be perfectly accurate and precisely wrong!
  24. 24. 24 Precision, Recall & the Cost of being wrong and right! 20 Million Muslims in EU. Expect < 1,300 active (Muslim) terrorists in EU* (note: 5,000+ Europeans estimated to have travelled to Iraq & Syria by end of 2015) Assume a more sophisticated model** gives the following: TRUE FALSE TRUE 1.0 thsd 0.3 thsd FALSE 9.0 thsd 19,978 thsd ACCURACY = 99.99% PRECISION = 10% RECALL = 77% Still BOOM! Costly police work and time spend on the wrong people. Predicted Actual (*) 687 (suspects) were arrested for terrorism related-offences in 2015 (source: Europol TE-SAT 2016 report). (**) e.g., Bayesian machine learning models, DNNs, social network analysis (e.g., social physics).
  25. 25. 25 Anomaly Detection. Identifying the black sheep. Fraud Detection. DDOS Attacks. Imminent Hardware Failure. Virus Propagation. (RT) System Anomaly Detection. Examples. Un-supervised learning models are (usually) used for anomaly detection. Look for Precision & Recall (accuracy tend to be a overrated) Appropriate Learning Models.
  26. 26. 26 Alexa https://www.fastcompany.com/3058721/app-economy/the-real-reasons-that-amazons-alexa-may-become-the-go- to-ai-for-the-home; https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601654/amazon-working-on-making-alexa-recognize-your- emotions/ Alexa AI lives in the cloud o Voice is the Main User Interface. o Automatic speech recognition (ASR). o Natural Language Understanding (NLU). o Contextual (to a degree). o Improving by using (e.g., optimizing). o (to come - memory of past conversations). o (to come - affective feedback). o (to come - conversational). User makes a request Audio stream is sent up to Alexa Alexa pass back a Audio response (or textual/graphical) Alexa – the AI for your home. Imagining customer care in your home whenever!
  27. 27. 27 Huge amount of Data! Need for “Clean” Data! Model! (can be up to 80 – 90% of work) Quality Goals! (the more data, the higher quality should result & the less complexity required … in general) Lots of Computing! (to built the model, normally as heavy not to run it) (some) Prerequisites for good A.I.’s (need to beat “Flipping a Coin” or Majority “Vote”) It Starts Here! 70% Train 30% Test
  28. 28. Have Fun! DON’T BE PERFECTLY ACCURATE AND PRECISELY WRONG!

×