3. Once I was attending a tech-talk show
where a host was anchoring, and there
were six React experts participating in
the show as guests. They came across a
tricky question in the show, and they
had to each answer the question:
Which is the best alternative to
React.js that you shall use in your next
project?
React.js is a marvelous JavaScript
library that employs Virtual DOM.
React is the prime choice of
developers when it comes to building
single-page applications. Obviously,
all the six experts were really tense,
but they had no choice but to think
and answer along with the logical
reasons.
4. React experts altogether started to
brainstorm, and they began with
noting down the flaws of using ReactJs
framework so that they can come
close to finding the best React
alternatives.
6. Most of the React developers find
it challenging to manage the huge
library size of the React.js
framework. Surely you can not
afford to invest in a framework
that demands an exquisite
memory space.
Secondly, React lacks MVC
architecture, especially the View
functionality is not managed by its
Model and Controller. Hence, you
need an alternative React
framework, which is view-
oriented.
React has a steep learning curve,
and developers need to invest a lot
of time to learn new technology.
Project ignition is delayed.
Many React.js developers find it
hard to grasp the documentation
of JSX React. Beginners are never
comfortable with this framework.
7. Hence, to find a better option against
the React.js framework, the React
experts gathered a list of top 6
javascript frameworks that
entrepreneurs like you can consider
for your upcoming projects.
In this blog, I am recalling and
bringing in front of you the list of
React.js alternatives that those experts
realized in the tech-talk show. Along
with the javascript frameworks, I have
mentioned the pros and cons of each
of the frameworks and their
comparison with React.js.
You may also like to read: Top React
UI Component Libraries and
Frameworks
9. Jason Miller introduced Preact under
the open-source MIT license. You can
think of Preact as a lightweight
alternative to the React library for
developing mobile or web
applications, and progressive web
apps PWA.
1. Preact
Preact Pros
✸ It is much compact, precise, and
lightweight in size (3KB) so your
application can perform faster.
✸ Preact uses ES6 API, which enables
you to uplift your application from
React to Preact very easily. You can
even adapt it as a library to create
fantastic user-interfaces for your
project.
10. ✸ Entrepreneurs can create new
projects easily by using the official
CLI without the trouble of getting into
Babel and Webpack configuration.
✸ You can get all the help from the
official website examples and Preact
documentation to kick-start your
application development.
✸ Along with all the inspiring features
of React, the Preact library also
consists of some special features like
the LinkedState.
11. Preact Cons
✪ You do not get the context support.
✪ For the stateful functionalities of
your application, the createClass
function is missing. Preact only allows
you to use ES6 class and stateless
components.
✪ Preact doesn’t care about the React
propTypes.
✪ The community size is yet to reach
the competition with React.
✪ Preact lacks innovation and mostly
mimics React.
12. Preact Vs. React
➤ API: Not all the React features are
present in Preact; it contains only a
small part of the React Application
Interface functionality.
➤ Size: As I mentioned in the
beginning, Preact is much lighter than
React. React is 5.3 KB, whereas Preact
is only 3 KB.
➤ Performance: Because of being
lightweight, Preact is faster as
compared to React applications.
13. React developers introduced Inferno
in 2017 as an experiment to check
whether a library can improve the
performance, battery, and UX of
mobile applications. Inferno can
develop client and server-side
interfaces with fantastic speed,
performance, and isomorphic
rendering.
2. Inferno JS
Inferno JS Pros
✸ Inferno is a lightweight React
alternative
✸ It is super-fast as it uses internal
objects for optimizations.
14. ✸ Instead of copying React, Inferno
has some unique lifestyle methods.
✸ Inferno uses the classic old CSS
properties.
✸ You get add-ons like routing,
server-side rendering, and more
Inferno JS Cons
✪ Inferno is not yet backed up by
adequate community size. Because of
the smaller ecosystem, you do not get
timely help and support.
✪ Unlike React, Inferno does not
support Hooks, Memo, suspense, or
lazy to keep the library compact.
However, you can keep considering
these features while writing in
Inferno.
15. ✪ The setState works synchronously.
✪ To use any of the React
components, you first need to write
and use a React component.
Inferno JS Vs. React.js
➤ React has a fully synthetic event
system, whereas Inferno only supports
partial synthetic events, including
certain functions such as onClick.
➤ You can not use React Native with
Inferno as you can in React. Inferno
surrounds the DOM structure for
browser/server edits.
➤ It lacks support for React legacy
strings like ref, callback, or createRef,
etc.
16. ➤ Using Inferno, you can get lifecycle
events based on functional
components instead of the ES2015
classes.
➤ You can debug your Inferno apps
using React dev tool extensions by
using “inferno-devtools” command.
➤ You can set up your styles in
Inferno using the CSS property name
method.
17. Jeremy Ashkenas, who developed
CoffeeScript and Underscore.js, also
introduced Backbone.js, which is
based on the MVP (model-view-
presenter) paradigm, and it has a
RESTfull JSON interface. You can use
Backbone.js as an alternative to
React.js in creating single-page web
applications so that you can keep
several pages synchronized.
Backbone.js attracts developers when
they want to use a simple framework
having the Javascript structure with
models. It is an open-source
framework with 27.6k stars on GitHub.
3. Backbone JS
18. Backbone.js Pros
✸ Uses a template engine for building
your application’s flexible UI.
✸ It enables complex user interaction
very easily.
✸ You can call all the underscore.js
methods using your backbone.js
objects.
✸ Backbone.js is extendable by using
the varied plugins available.
✸ Your backbone.js classes can listen
and trigger because they extend the
event class.
19. Backbone.js Cons
✪ While using backbone.js, your
developers can easily get into a mess
of coding.
✪ Does not support data binding.
✪ Developers need to invest time and
effort in learning the new syntax of
coding backbone.js.
✪ It relies on underscore.js and is not
independent.
20. Backbone.js Vs.
React.js
➤ Backbone is comparatively much
smaller and performant as compared
to React.
➤ Backbon.js can avail support for
routing and deep linking, unlike
React.js.
➤ React.js still leads the market share
in the top 10k and 100k sites.
➤ Backbone.js has proven stats that
make it a master in industries like
Arts, Games, Health, Entertainment,
and more companies.
21. Yehuda Katz developed Ember JS in
2011 for creating web applications. It
was earlier named SproutCore MVC
framework, and it offers client-side
rendering, URL support, templating
mechanism, and fascinating
functionality. Ember’s design has two-
way and server-side rendering.
4. Ember JS
Ember JS Pros
✸ Ember offers support and
maintenance for your developed
project.
✸ It offers server-side rendering with
URL support features and data
binding.
22. ✸ You can switch to the newer updates
with Ember’s advanced control
system.
✸ Ember JS provides you well-
described documentation explaining
which tools to use and which APIs to
avoid for updated versions.
Ember JS Cons
✪ The applications that you develop
in Ember seem to be a bit slower
because of the rendering. However,
they eventually pick up the speed.
✪ The Ember JS community is not as
big as the React.js community, so your
developers may lack the help. There
are fewer examples and code libraries.
23. ✪ Bottlenecks may arise in your
project if you get the solution to the
problem you are stuck in.
✪ There are no standard UI elements
in Ember JS.
Ember JS Vs. React.js
➤ Ember JS is based on the MVVM
(Model-View-ViewModel) model as
compared to React.js’s DOM model.
➤ Ember offers two-way data binding,
and React.js offers one-way data binding.
➤ React is ideal for dynamic and
complex projects, whereas Ember JS is
perfect for single-page applications
SPAs.
➤ Ember has a command-line interface
CLI, and React does not have it.
24. Vue.js is a progressive javascript
framework that Even You, introduced
in 2014. It is open-source and is useful
in developing single-page
applications. Vue enables eye-catching
UIs for your web projects.
5. Vue JS
Vue JS Pros
✸ It is effortlessly convenient to use
vue.js for your new or existing
projects because it works on HTML
templates.
✸ Vue offers a smooth integration
process without impacting your entire
system whether it is for your single
page application or for a complex web
interface.
25. ✸ Like most of the alternatives of
React.js, Vue JS is also smaller in its
library size and hence offers better
performance.
✸ Developers enthusiastically use
VueJS because it has a really easy
learning curve with detailed
documentation.
Vue JS Cons
✪ There are chances to face troubles
with Vue JS when developing large-
scale applications.
✪ Vue JS has a comparatively small
market share because it is new. You
may find it challenging to get the help
and support you need.
26. VueJS Vs. React.js
➤ You cannot reuse code in React.js
other than for CSS, whereas Vue JS
entails HTML and CSS code-
reusability.
➤ Vue is better for rendering and
optimization than React, as it enables
out-of-the-box rendering features.
➤ The learning curve of Vue is simpler
and easier than that of React. Your
developers can work on your project
briskly if using Vue.js.
➤ React.js uses Javascript XML, known
as JSX, for designing, whereas Vue JS
enables you to use JSX as well as
HTML templates and plugins.
27. Google released AngularJS in 2010 to
help build applications that have a
rich set of functions. By choosing
AngularJS for your web or mobile
application development, you do not
have to look for other options because
Angular is a complete framework.
6. AngularJS
Angular JS Pros
✸ With the AngularJS framework,
developers can build a clean code of
development.
✸ You get high performance with
your apps developed with an Angular
framework.
✸ You get an interface of material
design with Angular.
28. ✸ It is easy for your app users to shift
from one view to another because
AngularJS controls routing.
✸ Using the Angular command-line
interface, you get regular updates of
the framework for your web/mobile
project.
AngularJS Cons
✪ Angular has a steep learning curve,
so beginners find it challenging to
learn and adapt to this framework.
✪ You can’t rely on any help or
support, because AngularJS lacks
documentation.
✪ It gets a bit difficult to debug the
routing with the scopes.
29. ✪ Angular Apps with interactive
elements take time to load.
✪ Third-party integration is not easily
possible with the AngularJS
framework.
✪ Your app developers may get
troubled while upgrading their
Angular versions.
AngularJS Vs. React.js
➤ One can develop dynamic web apps
using Angular framework, whereas
React.js helps you to build amazing UI
components.
➤ React.js is based on Javascript,
whereas AngularJS is based on
Typescript.
30. ➤ AngularJS is based on the MVC
model, and on the other hand, React.js
is based on Virtual DOM.
➤ When using AngularJS, you cannot
add javascript libraries to your project,
whereas using React.js you can add JS
to your source code.
➤ Testing and debugging are by-
default with Angular, whereas with
React you need add-ons to test and
debug your project.
32. One has a lightweight library size; the
other one has MVC model
architecture, one is for single-page-
application, whereas another for web-
projects. Each React.js alternative has
its perks; it’s just on your
requirements what is best suitable for
your upcoming projects.
★If you consider AngularJS, it is a
fantastic framework as compared to
React.js, which is a javascript library.
★If you want to expand your current
web project, then React.js is the
perfect partner for you.
33. ★Vue.js is perfect when you want to
migrate or upgrade your application
for faster and smoother transmission.
★And you may use Preact when you
want to enhance the features and
functionality of your existing React.js
application. Hence, your app will be
optimized performance-wise.
34. For expert React.js development
services, get in touch with the
best ReactJS development company,
Bacancy Technology. We are an Agile
software development company with
seasoned ReactJS developers, and we
assure you that you can attain your
company goals with us. Our proficient
React.js developers will assist you on
the right alternatives to React js for
your upcoming projects. We have been
successful in delivering varied React
web projects in the market that have an
outstanding user response.
You are still confused about which JSX
framework is ideal for your web
development? Hire developers from the
leading React.js development company
and get aspired results.
Epilogue