1. RPMSTool
Teacher I-III
(Proficient Teachers
)2023-2024

2. KRA1: ContentKnowledgeandPedagogy
Page 2 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE
MEANSOF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
1. Applied
knowledge
ofcontent
withinand
across
curriculum
teaching areas.
(PPST1.1.2)
ClassroomObservation
Tool(COT)rating sheet/s
or inter-observer
agreementform/s done
throughonsite / face-to-face
/ in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• throughobservationof
ademonstration
teaching*via LAC
session.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 1as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 1as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 1as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 1as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 1as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 1offers illustrative andinstructive information that canhelp ratees achievethis objective(PPSTIndicator1.1.2).
2. Incomputing therating for Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(Very Satisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
COTRatingSheet3 5 3 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COTRatingSheet4 6 4 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

3. KRA1: ContentKnowledgeandPedagogy
Page 3 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE
MEANSOF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
2. Usedarange
ofteaching
strategies that
enhance
learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy
skills.
(PPST1.4.2)
ClassroomObservation
Tool(COT)rating sheet/s
or inter-observer
agreementform/s done
throughonsite / face-to-face
/ in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesarenot
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• throughobservationof
ademonstration
teaching*via LAC
session.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 2as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 2as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 2as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 2as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 2as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 2offersillustrative andinstructive information that canhelp ratees achievethis objective(PPST Indicator1.4.2).
2. Incomputingtheratingfor Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(Very Satisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
COTRatingSheet3 5 3 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COTRatingSheet4 6 4 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

4. KRA1: ContentKnowledgeandPedagogy
Page 4 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
3. Applied a
rangeof
teaching
strategies to
develop
critical and
creative
thinking, as
wellas
other
higher-order
thinking
skills.
(PPST1.5.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 3as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 3as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 3as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 3as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 3as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect the teaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 3offersillustrative andinstructive information that can help ratees achievethis objective(PPST Indicator1.5.2).
2. Incomputingtherating for Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscale rating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings; and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(Very Satisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
COTRatingSheet3 5 3 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COTRatingSheet4 6 4 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

5. KRA1: ContentKnowledgeandPedagogy
Page 5 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
4. Displayed
proficient use of
Mother Tongue,
Filipino and
English to
facilitate
teaching and
learning.
(PPST1.6.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• throughobservationof a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 4as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 4as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 4as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 4as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 4as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect the teaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 14offersillustrative andinstructive information that canhelp rateesachievethis objective(PPSTIndicator 1.6.2).
2. Incomputingtheratingfor Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

6. KRA2: LearningEnvironment &DiversityofLearners
Page 6 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
5. Established
safeandsecure
learning
environmentsto
enhance
learning through
theconsistent
implementation
ofpolicies,
guidelinesand
procedures.
(PPST2.1.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• throughobservationof a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 5as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 5as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 5as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 5as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 5as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule15offersillustrative andinstructive informationthat canhelp rateesachievethis objective(PPSTIndicator2.1.2).
2. Incomputing therating forQuality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscale rating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings; and(iii) findthe transmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

7. KRA2: LearningEnvironment &DiversityofLearners
Page 7 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
6. Maintained
learning
environments
that promote
fairness, respect
andcareto
encourage
learning.
(PPST2.2.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteachingin
other modalities; or
• throughobservationof a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 6as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 6as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 6as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 6as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 6as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. Incomputingtherating for Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

8. KRA2: LearningEnvironment &DiversityofLearners
Page 8 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
7. Establisheda
learner-centered
culturebyusing
teaching
strategies that
respond to their
linguistic,
cultural,socio-
economicand
religious
backgrounds.
(PPST3.2.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• throughobservationof a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 7as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 7as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 7as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 7as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 7as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect the teaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 17offersillustrative andinstructive information that canhelp rateesachievethis objective(PPSTIndicator 3.2.2).
2. Incomputing therating for Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

9. KRA2: LearningEnvironment &DiversityofLearners
Page 9 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
8. Adapted and
usedculturally
appropriate
teaching
strategies to
addressthe
needsof
learnersfrom
indigenous
groups.(PPST
3.5.2)
ClassroomObservation
Tool (COT)rating sheet/sor
inter-observer agreement
form/s donethroughonsite /
face-to-face/ in-person
classroom observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 8as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 8as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 8as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 8as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 8as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreement
forms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective wasmet
withinthe
allotted time
Objective wasmet
butinstruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. Incomputing therating forQuality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings; and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

10. KRA4: CurriculumandPlanning &AssessmentandReporting
Page 10 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
9. Setachievable
andappropriate
learning
outcomesthat
arealignedwith
learning
competencies.
(PPST4.2.2)
At leastone(1)lessonplan
(e.g.,DLP,DLL,WHLP,WLP,
WLL,Lesson Exemplars,andthe
likes) oronelessonfromaself-
learningmodule,developed by
theratee*andused in instruction,
with achievable andappropriate
learning outcomes thatare
alignedwith thelearning
competenciesasshownin any
one(1)ofthefollowing:
 lecture/discussion
 activity/activity sheet
 performancetask
 rubric forassessing
performanceusing criteria
that appropriately describe
thetargetoutput
Quality
Setlearning
outcomeswere
achievable and
appropriate, and
ledtothe
attainmentof the
next related
competency, as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted.
Setlearning
outcomeswere
achievable and
appropriate, and
contributedto
the
understanding
of thenext
related
competency, as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted.
Setlearning
outcomeswere
achievable and
appropriate, and
arealignedwith
thelearning
competencies, as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted.
Setlearning
outcomeswere
notachievable
orappropriate,
andwere
partiallyaligned
with thelearning
competencies, as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted.
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
All of the
learning
outcomesset
werealigned
with thelearning
competenciesas
showninthe
MOVsubmitted
Majority ofthe
learning
outcomesset
werealigned
with thelearning
competenciesas
showninthe
MOVsubmitted
At leasthalfof
thelearning
outcomesset
werealigned
with thelearning
competencies as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted
Lessthanhalf
ofthelearning
outcomesset
werealigned
with thelearning
competencies as
showninthe
MOVsubmitted
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* If thelessonplan orthelessonfrom aself-learningmoduleis aproductof agroupwork / collaborativeeffortof two (2) or moreteachers,rateeshouldspecifyandprovide annotations of one’scontributionto the
material.
Note: ThePPSTResourcePackageModule18offersillustrative andinstructive information that canhelp ratees achievethis objective (PPSTIndicator4.2.2).

11. KRA3: CurriculumandPlanning &AssessmentandReporting
Page 11 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
10. Used
strategies for
providing timely,
accurateand
constructive
feedbackto
improve learner
performance.
(PPST5.3.2)
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)rating sheet/sorinter-
observeragreementform/s
donethrough onsite/ face-to-
face / in-personclassroom
observation.
If onsite/ face-to-face/ in-
personclassesare not
implemented,
• throughobservationof
synchronous /
asynchronousteaching in
other modalities; or
• throughobservationof a
demonstration teaching*
via LACsession.
Quality
Demonstrated
Level7in
Objective 10as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level6in
Objective 10as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level5in
Objective 10as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level4in
Objective 10as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
Demonstrated
Level3in
Objective 10as
showninCOT
rating sheets/
inter-observer
agreementforms
or
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Objective was
metwithinthe
allotted time
Objective was
metbut
instruction
exceededthe
allotted time
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* Thedemonstrationteachingmustalways reflect theteaching-learningprocess.
Notes:
1. PPSTResourcePackageModule 20offers illustrative andinstructive information that can help ratees achievethis objective (PPSTIndicator5.3.2).
2. Incomputing therating for Quality: (i) getthecorrespondingRPMS5-pointscalerating of eachCOTrating; (ii) calculate theaverage of theRPMSratings;and(iii) findthetransmutedRPMSrating. See
sample computationbelow:
Meansof Verification
COT
Rating
RPMS5-point
ScaleRating
Average
RPMSRatingfor
Quality
RPMSRating
Transmutation Table
COTRatingSheet1 6 4
3.500
4
(VerySatisfactory)
Outstanding(5) 4.500-5.000
COTRatingSheet2 5 3 Very Satisfactory(4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor(1) 1.000-1.499

12. KRA3: CurriculumandPlanning &AssessmentandReporting
Page 12 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
11.Utilized
assessment
datatoinform
the
modification
ofteaching
andlearning
practicesand
programs.
(PPST5.5.2)
Alist ofidentified least/
mostmasteredskills based
onthe frequencyof errors/
correctresponseswithany
one(1) ofthefollowing
supporting MOVs
1. accomplishmentreport for
remedial/ enhancement
activities (e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer
ReadingCamp,Phil-IRI-
basedreadingprogram)
2. interventionmaterial used
for remediation/
reinforcement/
enhancement
3. lessonplan/activity log for
remediation/ enhancement
utilizing of assessment
datato modifyteaching
andlearningpractices or
programs
Quality
Implementeda
teachingand
learning strategy /
programusing
materials basedon
learners’
assessment data
asevidencedbya
list of identified
least / most
masteredskills
with supporting
MOVNo.1
Developed
materials basedon
learners’
assessment data
asevidencedbya
list of identified
least / most
masteredskills
with supporting
MOVNo.2
Plannedfor a
teachingand
learning strategy
and/orprogram
basedonlearners’
assessment data
asevidencedbya
list of identified
least / most
masteredskills
with supporting
MOVNo.3
Analyzed learners’
masteredskills
basedonthe
frequencyof errors
andcorrect
responsesas
evidencedby alist
of identifiedleast /
mostmastered
skills
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness
SubmittedMOV/s
showedutilization
of assessment
dataacross4
quarters
SubmittedMOV/s
showedutilization
of assessment
dataacross3
quarters
SubmittedMOV/s
showedutilization
of assessment
dataacross2
quarters
SubmittedMOV/s
showedutilization
of assessment
datain only1
quarter
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Note: PPSTResourcePackageModule 21offersillustrative andinstructive informationthat canhelpratees achievethis objective(PPSTIndicator5.5.2).

13. KRA4: PersonalGrowthandProfessionalDevelopment&Personal GrowthandProfessionalDevelopment
Page 13 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
12.Build
relationships
withparents/
guardians and
thewider
school
communityto
facilitate
involvementin
theeducative
process.
(PPST6.2.2)
Any one(1)ofthefollowing:
1. Proofof participation in any activity
highlighting theobjective, such as, but not
limited thefollowing:
 Receipt form/monitoring formduring
distribution of learning materials, etc.
 Commitmentformtostakeholders,
developed advocacy materials,
certificate of participation that shows
parents’/stakeholders’ engagement
signedbytheschool head,etc.
 Homevisitation forms
 AnyequivalentALSform/document
thathighlights theobjective
 Others(please specifyandprovide
annotations)
2. Parent-teacherlog or proofofother
stakeholders meeting(e.g., one-on-one
parent-teacherlearner conference log;
attendancesheetwith minutesof online or
face-to-facemeeting; proofof involvement
in the learners’/parents’ orientation, etc.)
3. Anyformof communication to
parents/stakeholders (e.g., notice of
meeting;screenshot of chat/text
message/communication with
parent/guardian)
Quality
Sustained
engagement
throughregular
communication of
learners’ needs,
progressand
achievementto
keystakeholders,
including parents/
guardians,as
shownin the
MOVsubmitted
Sustained
engagementwith
parents/guardians
and/orwider
school community
tofacilitate
involvement in the
educative process
asevidencedby2
ormoreofMOV
no.1or 2
Secured
collaboration
with
parents/guardians
and/orwider
school community
tofacilitate
involvement in the
educative process
asevidenced by
oneMOVno.1or
2
Communicated
withand
obtained
responsefrom
parents/guardians
and/orwider
school community
tofacilitate
involvement in the
educative process
asevidenced by
MOVNo.3
No
acceptable
evidence
wasshown
Timeliness
Showed
engagementwith
parents/guardians
andthewider
school community
across4
quarters
Showed
engagementwith
parents/guardians
andthewider
school community
across3
quarters
Showed
engagementwith
parents/guardians
andthewider
school community
across2
quarters
Showed
engagementwith
parents/guardians
andthewider
school community
inonly1quarter
No
acceptable
evidence
wasshown

14. KRA4: PersonalGrowthandProfessionalDevelopment &Personal GrowthandProfessionalDevelopment
Page 14 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE
MEANSOF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
13. Participatedin
professional
networkstoshare
knowledgeandto
enhancepractice.
(PPST7.3.2)
1. Certificate of completion
in acourse/training
2. Certificate of participation
in awebinar,retooling,
upskilling, andother
training/ seminar/
workshop with proofof
implementation
3. Certificate of recognition/
speakershipin awebinar
andothertraining/
seminar/workshop
4. Anyproofofparticipation
to a benchmarking activity
5. Anyproofofparticipation
in school LACsessions
(online/face-to-face)
certifiedbytheLAC
Coordinator
6. Others(please specify
andprovideannotations)
Quality
Participated in any
professional
network/activity that
requires output*
andproofof
implementation**
withintheschool to
shareknowledge and
to enhance practice
asevidencedbythe
submittedMOV
Participated in any
professional
network/activity that
requires output*
andproofof
implementation**
withinthe
department/grade
level toshare
knowledge and to
enhancepractice as
evidencedby the
submittedMOV
Participated in any
professional
network/activity
thatrequires
output*to share
knowledge and to
enhance practice
asevidencedbythe
submittedMOV
Participated in any
professional
network/activity
thatdoesnot
require output to
shareknowledge
andtoenhance
practice as
evidencedby the
submittedMOV
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness
Participated in
professional networks
toshareknowledge
andto enhance
practice across 4
quarters
Participated in
professional networks
toshareknowledge
andto enhance
practice across 3
quarters
Participated in
professional
networks toshare
knowledge and to
enhancepractice
across2quarters
Participated in
professional
networks toshare
knowledge and to
enhancepractice in
only1quarter
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
* “Output” mayinclude,but notlimited to, lessonplan, instructional materials,actionplan,or any teaching andlearning-related materials.
** “Proof of implementation”canbein the formof implementedactionplan,lessonplan executed in class, application project, etc.
Note: PPSTResourcePackageModule 23offersillustrative andinstructive informationthat canhelpratees achievethis objective (PPSTIndicator7.3.2).

15. KRA4: PersonalGrowthandProfessionalDevelopment&Personal GrowthandProfessionalDevelopment
Page 15 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCEINDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
14.Developed
apersonal
improvement
planbasedon
reflection of
one’spractice
andongoing
professional
learning.
(PPST7.4.2)
1. Certificationfromthe ICT
Coordinator/ SchoolHead/
FocalPersoninchargeof e-
SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
3. Mid-yearReviewForm(MRF)
4. Updated IPCRF-DPfrom
PhaseII
Quality
Updated
professional
development
goalsduring
PhaseII of the
RPMSCycleas
evidencedby
MOV4
Discussed
progresson
professional
development
goalswith the
rater duringthe
mid-yearreview
asevidenced by
MOV3
Set
professional
development
goalsbasedon
e-SATresults as
evidencedby
MOV2
Accomplished
thee-SATat the
beginningof the
schoolyearas
evidencedby
MOV1
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
Submitted4
acceptableMOVs
Submitted3
acceptableMOVs
Submitted2
acceptable
MOVs
Submitted1
acceptableMOV
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness
All four(4)
submittedMOVs
were
accomplished
withinthe
prescribed
RPMSPhase
Three(3) ofthe
submittedMOVs
were
accomplished
withinthe
prescribed
RPMSPhase
Two(2) of the
submittedMOVs
were
accomplished
withinthe
prescribed
RPMSPhase
Onlyone (1) of
thesubmitted
MOVswas
accomplished
withinthe
prescribed
RPMSPhase
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Note: PPSTResourcePackageModule 24offersillustrative andinstructive informationthat canhelpratees achievethis objective (PPSTIndicator7.4.2).

16. PlusFactor
Page 16 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
OBJECTIVE MEANSOFVERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
Outstanding
(5)
VerySatisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
15.Performed
various related
works/
activities that
contribute to
theteaching-
learning
process.
Any one (1) proof of:
● committeeinvolvement;
● involvement as
module/learning material
writer/validator;
● involvement asaresource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
● bookorjournal authorship/
co-authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in demonstration
teaching;
● participation as research
presenterin a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/in-
service teachers;
● conductedresearch within
therating period;
● others(please specify)
withannotationonhowit
contributedtothe teaching-
learningprocess.
Quality
Performedat least
one(1)related work
/ activity that
contributedto the
teaching-learning
process beyondthe
school/
Community
LearningCenter
(CLC) asevidenced
bythesubmitted
MOV.
Performedat least
one(1)related work
/ activity that
contributedto the
teaching-learning
processwithinthe
school/
Community
LearningCenter
(CLC) asevidenced
bythesubmitted
MOV.
Performedat least
one(1)related work
/ activity that
contributedto the
teaching-learning
processwithinthe
learning
area/department as
evidencedby the
submittedMOV.
Performedat least
one(1) related work
/ activity that
contributedto the
teaching-learning
processwithinthe
classasevidenced
bythesubmitted
MOV.
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency
SubmittedMOVthat
detailsthe
achievedpositive
contribution to the
teaching-learning
process,as
evidencedby the
annotation provided.
SubmittedMOVthat
detailsthe
perceived positive
contribution to the
teaching-learning
process,as
evidencedby the
annotation provided.
SubmittedMOVthat
showsreasonable
interlapwiththe
actualteaching-
learningprocess,
asevidencedbythe
annotation provided.
SubmittedMOVthat
shows
considerable
overlap with,hence
significantly
affectingthe
performanceof the
actualteaching-
learningprocess.
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness
SubmittedMOVs
weredistributed
across4quarters
SubmittedMOVs
weredistributed
across3quarters
SubmittedMOVs
weredistributed
across2quarters
SubmittedMOV/s
was/were
completedin only
1quarter
N
o acceptable
evidence was
shown

17. SUMMARY
Page 17 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
Objective Q E T MOV/s No.ofMOVs
KRA1
1 ✓ ✓
ClassroomObservation Tool(COT)rating sheet/s or inter-observeragreementform/s donethroughonsite / face-to-face/ in-person
classroomobservation.
If onsite/ face-to-face / in-person classesarenotimplemented,
• throughobservation of synchronous / asynchronous teachingin other modalities;or
• throughobservation of ademonstrationteaching* via LACsession.
4*
2 ✓ ✓ 4*
3 ✓ ✓ 4*
4 ✓ ✓ 2*
KRA2
5 ✓ ✓ 2*
6 ✓ ✓ 2*
7 ✓ ✓ 2*
8 ✓ ✓ 2*
KRA3
9 ✓ ✓
Atleastone(1) plan (e.g., DLP,DLL,WHLP,WLP,WLL,Lesson Exemplars,andthelikes or onelessonplanfromaself-learningmodule,
developed bytheratee andusedin instruction,with achievableandappropriate learning outcomesthat arealigned with the learning
competenciesasshowninanyoneof thefollowing:
• lecture/discussion
• activity/activity sheet
• performance task
• rubric for assessing performance usingcriteria that appropriately describe the targetoutput
2*
10 ✓ ✓ Seesimilar MOVaboveonCOTrating sheetor inter-observeragreementform 2*
11 ✓
✓ Alist of identifiedleast/ mostmasteredskills basedonthefrequencyof errors / correctresponses withanyone(1) of thefollowing
supporting MOVs
● accomplishmentreport for remedial/ enhancementactivities (e.g., remedial sessions, SummerReading Camp,Phil-IRI-based reading
program)
● interventionmaterial usedfor remediation/ reinforcement/ enhancement
● lessonplan/activity log for remediation/ enhancementutilizing of assessmentdatato modifyteaching andlearning practices or
programs
2*
KRA4
12 ✓ ✓
Anyone(1) ofthefollowing:
1. Proofof participationin anyactivity highlightingthe objective,such as, butnotlimited thefollowing:
 Receipt form/monitoring form during distribution of learning materials,etc.
 Commitmentformto stakeholders, developed advocacymaterials,certificate of participationthat showsparents’/stakeholders’
engagementsignedby theschoolhead,etc.
 Homevisitation forms
 AnyequivalentALSform/documentthat highlightsthe objective
 Others(please specifyandprovide annotations)
1. Parent-teacherlog or proofof other stakeholdersmeeting (e.g., one-on-oneparent-teacherlearner conference log; attendance sheet
with minutes ofonline or face-to-facemeeting;proofof involvementin thelearners’/parents’orientation, etc.)
2. Anyform of communicationto parents/stakeholders (e.g., noticeof meeting;screenshot of chat/text message/communicationwith
parent/guardian)Otherdocumentsshowing learners’ needs,progressand achievement submittedto other stakeholders
4
13 ✓ ✓
1. Certificate of completionina course/training
2. Certificate of participation in a webinar, retooling, upskilling, andothertraining/ seminar/ workshopwith proof ofimplementation 4

18. 3. Certificate of recognition/speakershipin awebinar andothertraining/ seminar/workshop
4. Anyproofof participationto abenchmarkingactivity
5. Anyproofof participationin school LACsessions(online/face-to-face)certified by theLACCoordinator
Others(please specifyandprovide annotations)
14 ✓ ✓ ✓
1. Certification fromtheICTCoordinator / School Head/ Focal Personin charge of e-SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
3. Mid-year ReviewForm(MRF)
4. UpdatedIPCRF-DPfromPhaseII
4
KRA5 15 ✓ ✓ ✓
Anyone(1) proof of:
● committeeinvolvement;
● involvementas module/learning material writer/validator;
● involvementas a resourceperson/speaker/learning facilitator in in the RO/SDO/school-initiated TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal authorship/ co-authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/coordinatorship/ chairpersonship;
● participation in demonstration teaching;
● participationas researchpresenter in a forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/in-service teachers;
● conducted researchwithin the rating period;
with annotation onhowit contributedto theteaching-learningprocess.
4
TOTAL
Minimum of
48MOVs
Page 18 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers
* Note thatMOVsfortheClassroom Observable Indicators(COIs) maybecrosscutting.Submission of four(4) COTratingsheetsmayalready reflect theachievement of thenine (9) COIs.

19. GLOSSARY
Audiolesson Thisreferstoalearningmaterialthatis anaudio recordedlesson whichcanbeusedfordistancelearningor assupplementarymaterial.This canbesaved in
aUSBflash drive andplayed in adevice (e.g.,plug-and-playradios with USBport,TVwithUSBport,computer,etc.).
Evaluating This refers to the periodic and systematic use of assessment forms and strategies (e.g., quarterly assessments, pretest & posttest) in order to judge learner
achievement; that is, how well the learner has learned the knowledge and/or skills covered in a unit. Summative assessment, essays, presentation, group
work, performances and standardized tests are used to inform the teachers about their teaching. Learners are marked on formal evaluation tasks and this
markis usually partoftheirreportcardgrade.
Learnerachievement This pertainsto theremarkablecurricular or co-curricular performanceof alearner recognized by theschool.
Learnerattainmentdata This pertainsto evidence(s) andresults ofvariousassessments that areused in themonitoringand evaluationoflearner progress
andachievement
Learnerneeds This refersto theobservable behavior or attitude of alearnerthattheteachermustaddressimmediately
Learnerprogress This referstoatrail of stagesof alearner’s school andacademic status.
Learning action cell (LAC) This functions as a professional learning community for teachers that will help them improve practice and learner achievement (Department of Education
2016a, i) LACaims to improvethe teaching-learning process that will lead to improved learning amongthe students; to nurture successful teachers; to enable
teachers to support each other to continuously improve their content and pedagogical knowledge, practice, skills, and attitudes; and to foster a professional
collaborative spiritamongschoolheads,teachers,andthecommunityasawhole(DepartmentofEducation2016a,3).
Lesson exemplar “During pandemic and other disruptive events, all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the region shall prepare their lesson exemplars instead
of the usual Detailed Lesson Plan (DLPs) and/or Daily Learning Logs (DLL) for MELCs and/or enabling competencies” (Department of Education -
CALABARZON2020,10).
Lesson plan This refersto theDaily LessonLog (DLL) or DetailedLesson Plan (DLP)aspart of instructional planning (DepartmentofEducation 2016b).
Other forms of a lesson plan are the Weekly Lesson Plan (WLP), Weekly Lesson Log (WLL), Weekly HomeLearning Plan (WHLP) and Lesson Exemplars
(LE).
Monitoring This refers to the continuous and systematic use of data in order to track learner progress through a variety of forms such as daily learning log, class record,
progress chart, checklist, and anecdotal record. Formative assessment, checking for understanding, providing feedback, and other strategies that are not
standardizedareusedtomonitorlearner progressin orderforteacherstoappropriatelyaddressmisconceptionsandotherlearning problems.
Stakeholder This refers to either internal (teachers, school administrators and personnel) or external (parents/guardian, community and industry partners) individuals or
groupof individuals who participate or collaborate towardstheattainmentof theschool’s academic and institutional goals.
Supplementary materials These refer to learning resources craftedby teachers to supplement thematerialshandeddown by theDepEd division/regional/central offices.
These materials should be aligned with DepEd standards and support the contextualized needs of learners in online, modular, and TV- and radio-based
instruction. These teacher-made learning materials can be printed or digital modules, activity sheets, interactive e-materials, and MELCs-aligned video- and
audio-lessons(DepartmentofEducation- UndersecretaryforCurriculumandInstruction2020,3).Writingtaskscanalsobepartofthesupplementarymaterials
where learners can write the challenges they are facing and what parts of the lesson they did not fully understand and need additional help for from their
teacher(DepartmentofEducation 2020b,37).
VideoLesson This referstoalearning materialsimilar to avideo-recordedlesson andvideo-tapedlesson usedfor online asynchronous teaching or used as
supplementarymaterial. Thismaterial can beuploaded to YouTube, Google Classroom,or any online platform,or distributed via storagedevices (e.g.,flash
drives or CD-ROMs).
Page 19 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers

20. REFERENCES
Bickford,DeborahJ. andDavid J. Wright.2006. “Community: TheHidden Context forLearning.”InLearning Spaces,editedby Diana Oblinger.EDUCAUSE.
https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB7102d.pdf
Governmentof the Philippines. 1997.TheIndigenousPeoples’ Rights Actof 1997. Republic Act No.8371. Manila.
Governmentof thePhilippines. 1991.MagnaCartaforDisabled persons.Republic ActNo.7277.Manila.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2020a. Guidelines onthe Useof theMost EssentialLearning Competencies. Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2020b. Adoption of theBasic EducationLearning ContinuityPlan forSchool Year2020-2021 in Light of the Covid-19 Public Health
Emergency. Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2019a. Classroom Observation Tool. Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2019b. Results-basedPerformance ManagementSystemUpdatedManual. Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2017. NationalAdoption andImplementationof the Philippine ProfessionalStandardsfor Teachers. Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 2016a. TheLearning Action Cell as a Kto 12 Basic EducationProgramSchool-based Continuing ProfessionalDevelopment Strategy
fortheImprovementof Teachingand Learning.PasigCity.
Governmentof thePhilippines, Department of Education. 2016b. Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation fortheKto 12Basic EducationProgram.Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education. 1987. Policies and Guidelines forSpecial Education.Pasig City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education-CALABARZON.2019.PIVOT4ABudgetof Workin All LearningAreasin KeyStage1-4 (version2.0).Cainta.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education-Undersecretaryfor Administration.2021. TheProper Useof DepEd Radio asa Blended Distance Learning Delivery Modality. Pasig
City.
Governmentof the Philippines, Department of Education-Undersecretaryfor Curriculum and Instruction. 2020. Suggested Strategiesin ImplementingDistance Learning Delivery Modalities
(DLDM)forSchoolYear2020-2021. Pasig City.
NationalAssociation forGiftedChildren. 2019.ADefinition of GiftednessthatGuides BestPractice. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/
Definition%20of%20Giftedness%20%282019%29.pdf
Page 20 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teachers