Velocys1

Velocys Product/ProcessVelocys Product/Process
DevelopmentDevelopment
John GlenningJohn Glenning
July 23, 2009July 23, 2009

Velocys Micro-Channel ProcessVelocys Micro-Channel Process
Fischer-Tropsch Project: Micro-channel Reactors
Reactor Block Metal
1. 304L Stainless Steel
• Low Metal Cost
• Poor Thermal Conductivity (16.2 W/M°K)
2. Copper
• High Metal Cost
• Great Thermal Conductivity (401 W/M°K)
3. Aluminum
• High Metal Cost
• Great Thermal Conductivity (250 W/M°K)
• Low melting point
Thermal Coefficient of Expansion was within 10% to 15% of each other

Manufacturing Costs
• Sale Price based on Market Analysis: $225K to $250K

Manufacturing Costs
• Manufacturing cost: $270K/Reactor
Measure 20% of the shims & 3% of the features/shim

Manufacturing Costs
• Measure 100% of the shims & 3% of the features/shim
Cost: $340K/Reactor

Manufacturing Costs
Cost: $340K/Reactor
Cost: $1,700K/Reactor

Manufacturing Costs
Cost: $340K/Reactor
Cost: $1,700K/Reactor
• Shipping Costs: $95K/Reactor

Plan of Record Manufacturing Process
• Photochemical Machining (PCM) of patterns into the Shims
• Plating Shims with brazing material
• Clean Shims
• Stack Shims
• Braze Reactor

• Clean Shims
• Stack Shims
• Braze Reactor
Photochemical Machining industry is consolidating in the US
• Projecting increase manufacturing costs

• Clean Shims
• Stack Shims
• Braze Reactor
Photochemical Machining industry is consolidating in the US
• Projecting increase manufacturing costs
Photochemical Machining in Asia
• Reduced PCM Cost
• Offset by Trans-Pacific Shipping Costs

Manufacturing Capability
• 5 reactors builds using 3 PCM companies

• If design specification became manufacturing specification: 0% yield

• Manufacturing process was “Not Capable”
• Over 80% of specified features had Cp/Cpk significantly less than 1.00
on a consistent basis
• Processing variability was well within the norm for the PCM industry
• To eliminate the need for mass inspect, all the Cp/Cpk had to be
greater than 2.00

greater than 2.00
• Initial product testing showed Reactor productivity 60% to 80% higher than
anticipated based on modeling

greater than 2.00
• Reviewed results and proposed specification relief

greater than 2.00
• Reviewed results and proposed specification relief
• With specification relief, the manufacturing process was still “Not Capable”
and still had 0% yield

Product Design Review:
• Identify potential alternative manufacturing processes

• Reduce manufacturing cost

• Improve manufacturing capability

• Improve manufacturing capability
• Improve reactor productivity

Reactor Productivity
• Limiting Factor for Reactor Productivity: Heat generated in the
catalyst bed

catalyst bed
• Limits Syn Gas injection rate

catalyst bed
• Limiting Factor for removing heat: Thermal Conductivity of the
stainless steel

catalyst bed
stainless steel
• Current design of the reactor is cross-current cooling

catalyst bed
stainless steel
• Created a temperature gradient across the diagonal of the reactor

catalyst bed
stainless steel
• Created a temperature gradient across the diagonal of the reactor
• Limited productivity and selectivity from the reactor

Reactor Redesign for Manufacturability
• Counter-Current Cooling: Design minimizes temperature gradient in the catalyst
bed improving productivity and selectivity due to uniform temperature

• Improve reactor productivity and selectivity due to better heat transfer

• Coolant channel flow with no eddy currents

• Manufacturing Process: Electro-Chemical Machine (ECM) reactor with
alternative design

• Manufacturing Process: Electro-Chemical Machine (ECM) reactor with
alternative design
• Eliminates:
• Plating Brazing material
• Cleaning
• Stacking
• Brazing

Electro-Chemical Machining (ECM)
• ECM is a method of removing metal by an electrochemical process

• ECM’s use is limited to electrically conductive materials

• ECM can cut small or odd-shaped angles, intricate contours or cavities in
extremely hard metals

• Current is passed between the tool (cathode) and the part (anode) through an
electrolyte material, which conducts current, removes the etched metal and heat

• Current is passed between the tool (cathode) and the part (anode) through an
electrolyte material, which conducts current, removes the etched metal and heat
• The pressurized electrolyte is injected into the area being etched

ECM Process Cost Reductions
• Metal Costs Reduction: $40K to $36K
• Shipping Costs Reduction: $95K to $15K
• Eliminate Plating, Clean, Stacking and Brazing: $100K cost
reduction
• Eliminate $184K in manufacturing costs

ECM Process Cost Reductions
• Metal Costs Reduction: $40 to $36K
• Shipping Costs Reduction: $95K to $15K
• Eliminate Plating, Clean, Stacking and Brazing: $100K cost
reduction
• Eliminate $184K in manufacturing costs
Eliminate metal-brazing interfaces (240/reactor)
• Eliminate fatigue failures to the CTE mismatch
• Operate at higher pressures
• Increase conversion rates
• Increase formation of long chain liquid hydrocarbons

ECM Manufacturing
• 5 ECM companies in the US

ECM Manufacturing
• ECM lines were built for the Raptor and Joint Strike Fighter
projects

ECM Manufacturing
projects
• Capacity utilization was between 5% and 20%, depending
on the ECM company

ECM Manufacturing
projects
• Capacity utilization was between 5% and 20%, depending
on the ECM company
• Worked with ECM companies to determine process
limitations and manufacturing variability

ECM Manufacturing Costs
• Tooling Costs
• Design & Build of initial tooling: $50K to $150K
• Back-up Tooling Build: $25K to $50K
• Prorated tooling costs/Reactor over 7 years: $45 to
$115

• Tooling Costs
$115
• ECM manufacturing time: 4 to 8 hours per reactor block

• Tooling Costs
$115
• ECM manufacturing time: 4 to 8 hours per reactor block
• ECM costs were not determined due to Velocys’ acquisition
by Oxford Catalyst

Productivity Improvement Opportunity
• Limiting Factor: Removing the heat from the catalyst bed

• Thermal conductivity of 304L Stainless Steel: 16.2 W/M°K

• Researched coating options to improve heat transfer

• Thermal conductivity of Diamond: 1800 W/M°K

• Consulting with CVD company in California

• 50 microns of diamond on the catalyst channel walls

• Significantly increase Syn gas injection rate while being able to
remove heat from the catalyst bed

• Increase liquid hydrocarbon productivity

• Increase liquid hydrocarbon productivity
• Cost and feasibility were not determined due to Velocys’ acquisition
by Oxford Catalyst

End of Fischer-Tropsch
Presentation

Velocys1

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (8)

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Velocys1

Ähnlich wie Velocys1 (20)

Mehr von John Glenning

Mehr von John Glenning (20)

Velocys1