SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 92
Developmental Dysplasia of the
Hip
JAYANT SHARMA
M.S, DNB, MNAMS.
Definition
DDH is a spectrum of disorders. Hip can be
• Dislocated
• Dislocatable
• Subluxatable
• Dysplastic
• Previously known as congenital dislocation
of the hip implying a condition that existed
at birth
• developmental encompasses embryonic,
fetal and infantile periods
• includes congenital dislocation and
developmental hip problems including
subluxation, dislocation and dysplasia
Normal Growth and
Development
• Embryologically the acetabulum, femoral head develop
from the same primitive mesenchymal cells
• cleft develops in precartilaginous cells at 7th week and this
defines both structures
• 11wk hip joint fully formed
• acetabular growth continues throughout intrauterine life
with development of labrum
• birth femoral head deeply seated in acetabulum by surface
tension of synovial fluid and very difficult to dislocate
• in DDH this shape and tension is abnormal in addition to
capsular laxity
• The cartilage complex is 3D with triradiate medially
and cup-shaped laterally
• interposed between ilium above and ischium below
and pubis anteriorly
• acetabular cartilage forms outer 2/3 cavity and the
non-articular medial wall form by triradiate cartilage
which is the common physis of these three bones
• fibrocartilaginous labrum forms at margin of
acetabular cartilage and joint capsule inserts just
above its rim
• articular cartilage covers portion articulating with femoral
head opposite side is a growth plate with degenerating
cells facing towards the pelvic bone it opposes
• triradiate cartilage is triphalanged with each side of each
limb having a growth plate which allows interstitial
growth within the cartilage causing expansion of hip joint
diameter during growth
• In the infant the greater trochanter, proximal femur and
intertrochanteric portion is cartilage
• 4-7 months proximal ossification center appears which
enlarges along cartilaginous anlage until adult life when
only thin layer of articular cartilage persists
Development contd.
• Experimental studies in humans with unreduced hips
suggest the main stimulus for concave shape of the
acetabulum is presence of spherical head
• for normal depth of acetabulum to increase several factors
play a role
– spherical femoral head
– normal appositional growth within cartilage
– periosteal new bone formation in adjacent pelvic bones
– development of three secondary ossification centers
• normal growth and development occur through balanced
growth of proximal femur, acetabulum and triradiate
cartilages and the adjacent bones
At Birth
• Teratological Dislocation occurs in
– Arthrogryposis
– Neuromuscular disorders
– Diastrophic Dwarfism
• Typical DDH
– Child is otherwise normal
– This presentation is about DDH in an otherwise
normal child
Aetiology is Multifactorial
• Environmental & Mechanical
– Breech Presentation DDH Cases (16%):
All deliveries (3%)
– Birth Order >50% Cases 1st. Born
– Oligohydramnios
– Sex Ratio (Relaxin) F(4 - 6) : M(1)
– Side L(2) : R(1)
– Bilateral 35 %
– Nursing Habits
Aetiology- Breech
• Only 3% of children are Breech presentation
• 16% of DDH cases are breech
• Extended breech has 20% risk of DDH
• Footling breech 2%
• If have LSCS still at risk
Aetiology-Ligamentous Laxity
• Maternal Relaxin hormones crosses the
placenta and induce hip capsule laxity in
infant and this effect is much stronger in
females.
Aetiology - Genetic Factors
• Genetic
– There is an unknown genetic factor
– Runs in families
– Risk to next child increases as follows:
• If one child is affected risk is 6%
• Parent 10%,
• Parent and child 36%
• Genetic Predisposition (Wynne Davies)
– Families with Generalised Ligament Laxity
– Families with Acetabular Dysplasia
Aetiology- Nursing
• Rare in China, Asia, Africa (carry children
with hips flexed and abducted)
• High in native American (Used to nurse
with legs extended)
• Klisic reduced DDH by 65% in Belgrade by
routine use of abduction diapering
Associated conditions
Quoted risk of DDH with following conditions:
• Child with Torticollis*
15-20%
• Metatarsus adductus 10%
• Calcaneovalgus 10%
*Hummer C, MacEwenG:The coexistence of torticollis and congenital dysplasia of the hip. J Bone
Joint Surg 1972; 54-A:1255.
• Breech positioning
• Family history (Treatment with
Harness/Spica/Surgery, not double
nappies)
• Foot deformity
• Infantile muscular torticollis
• ?Oligohydramnios
Risk Factors
Etiology
• Genetic and ethnic
• increased native Americans but very low in southern Chinese
and Africans
• positive family history 12-33%
• 10x risk if affected parent, 7X if sibling
• intrauterine factors
– breech position ( normal pop’n 2-4% , DDH 17-23% )
– oligohydroamnios
– neuromuscular conditions like myelomeningocele
• high association with intrauterine molding abnormalities
including metatarsus adductus and torticollis
• first born
• female baby ( 80% cases)
• left hip more common
Epidemiology
• 1 in 100 newborns examined have evidence of instability
( positive Barlow or Ortolani)
• 1 in 1000 live births true dislocation
• most detectable at birth in nursery
• Barlow stated that 60% stabilize in 1st week and 88% stabilize
in first 2 months without treatment remaining 12% true
dislocations and persist without treatment
• Coleman26% become dislocated, 13% partial contact 39%
located but dysplatic features 22% normal
Incidence• Caucasians
– 1.7/1000 Von Rosen, 1962
– 1.5/1000 Barlow, 1962
• Native Americans
– 188.5/1000 Walker, 1973
• Native Africans
– 0/1000 Edelstein, 1966
• Chinese
– 0.1/1000 Hoagland, 1981
Incidence
• 1-2/1000 Live births
• Hip instability (phys) at birth: 1-2%
• Barlow JBJS1962
– 1 in 60 born with instability
– 60% resolve in the 1st week
– 88% resolve in 1st 2 months
– Remaining 12% are true dislocations
~1.5/1000
DDH --PATHOLOGY
• Tight fit between head and acetabulum is absent and head can
glide in and out of acetabulum
• hypertrophied ridge of acetabular cartilage in superior, posterior
and inferior aspects of acetabulum called “ neolimbus”
• often a trough or grove in this cartilage due to pressure from
femoral head or neck
• 98% DDH that occur around or at birth have these changes and
are reversible in the newborn
• 2% newborns with teratologic or antenatal dislocations and no
syndrome have these changes
• Development in treated DDH different from
normal hip
• goal is to reduce the femoral head ASAP to
provide the stimulus for acetabular
development
• if concentric reduction is maintained potential
for recovery and resumption of normal growth
• Age at which DDH hip can still
return to normal is controversial
depends on
–age at reduction
–growth potential of acetabulum
–damage to acetabulum from head
or during reduction
• Accessory centers seen in 2-3%
normal hips however in treated
DDH seen up to 60% appearing
ages 6 months to 10 years ( should
look for these on radiographs to
indicate continued growth)
Diagnosis
• Clinical risk factors
• Physical exam
– Ortolani Test
• hip flexion and abduction , trochanter elevated and
femoral head glides into acetabulum
– Barlow Test
• provocative test where hip flexed and adducted and head
palpated to exit the acetabulum partially or completely
over a rim
– some base there treatment on whether ortolani+ versus
Barlow+ feeling Barlow + more stable
– Lovell and Winter make no distinction
– 2% extreme complete irreducible teratologic disloactions
assoc with other conditions like arthrogyposis
Late Diagnosis
• Secondary adaptive changes occur
• limitation of abduction due to adductor longus shortening
• Galleazi sign
– flex both hips and one side shows apparent femoral
shortening
• asymmetry gluteal, thigh or labial folds
• limb-length inequailty
• waddling gait and hyperlordosis in bilateral cases
Screening for DDH
• Controversial
• Methods
– Clinical
– U.S. Scan
– Selective vs. Universal Ultrasound
screening programme
Aim of screening
• Early detection leads to:
– simple treatment, less duration, more
favourable results, less complications.
• Reduces late presentation
• Reduces surgical intervention
Clinical screening
• Introduced in 1969
• Updated in 1986 (SMAC)
• Standard programme
– Barlow’s/Ortolani’s tests done on every child at
birth and then at 6-8 weeks.
• Continued surveillance until walking normally
Clinical screening
• Barlow’s/Ortolani’s Tests
– Specificity- 100%
– Sensitivity- 60%
Because of low sensitivity:
– False-positive test results in Over-treatment
– False negative test results in Late-presentation
Ultrasound Screening
• High Specificity and Sensitivity: >90%
• Helps in diagnosis of not only Subluxated/
Dislocated hips but also Dysplastic hips
Ultrasound
• Helps in accurate diagnosis
• Helps in Monitoring the treatment
• Reduces the need for Arthrograms / Xrays.
Ultrasound Screening
• Techniques:
1) Static (Graf)*
2) Dynamic (Harcke)**
3) Combination
*JPO 1983; 3: 354-95 **JBJS 1985;67B: 406-12
Screening Programme
• Selective- Only High risk group of infants
is referred- More common in UK
• Population (Universal or Routine)- All
infants are referred for Ultrasound- More
common in European countries
Indications for selective screening
• Clicky hip (B/O)? (Clunk)
• Breech
• Pos. Family History
- Harness/Spica/Surgery (not double nappies)
• Sternomastoid tumour/ Torticollis
• Foot deformities
• ?Oligohydramnios
Other reasons for referral after
first few weeks
• Asymmetric skin folds (not very good
indicator on its own)
• Limited Abduction
• Leg length discrepancy
– May be only signs later until abnormal gait is
noticed when walking (too late)
Selective hip screening clinic
• General Examination:
-Plagiocephaly,
-Sternomastoid Tumour (Torticollis),
-Spine for cutaneous manifastations of
dyspharism
-Feet for any congenital deformity
Selective Hip screening clinic
• Hip Examination
-Barlow’s test (<3-4 months of age)
-Ortolani’s test (<3-4 months of age)
-Limitation of Abduction
-Leg length discrepancy (Galleazi test)
-Asymmetry of thigh folds
- Limp in a walking child
Selective Hip screening clinic
• Children <6 months have ultrasound using
Graf classification system
Class Alpha angle Description
I >60 Normal
II 60-43 Immature/Dysplastic
III <43 Subluxed/Dislocated
IV Unmeasurable Dislocated
• Children >6 months have Xrays.
Radiography
• Ultra sound
• morphologic assessment and dynamic
– anatomical characteristics
• alpha angle: slope of superior aspect bony acetabulum
• beta angle: cartilaginous component (problems with inter
and intraobserver error )
– dynamic
• observe what occurs with Barlow and ortolani testing
• indications controversial due to high levels of overdiagnosis and
not currently recommended as a routine screening tool other
than in high risk patients
• best indication is to assess treatment
– guided reduction of dislocated hip or check reduction and
stability during Pavlik harness treatment
Radiography con’td
• newborn period DDH not a radiographic diagnosis
and should be made by clinical exam
• after newborn period diagnosis should be
confirmed by xray
• several measurements
• treatment decisions should be based on changes in
measurements
Radiological Diagnosis
• Classic Features
– increased acetabular index ( n=27, >30-35 dysplasia)
– disruption shenton line ( after age 3-4 should be intact
on all views)
– absent tear drop sign
– delayed appearance ossific nucleus and decreased
femoral head coverage
– failure medial metaphyseal beak of proximal femur ,
secondary ossification center to be located in lower
inner quadrant
– center-edge angle useful after age 5 ( < 20) when can
see ossific nucleus
Pe
Natural History
in Newborns
• Barlow
– 1 in 60 infants have instability ( positive Barlow)
– 60% stabilize in 1st week
– 88% stabilize in 2 months without treatment
– 12 % become true dislocations and persist
• Coleman
– 23 hips < 3 months
– 26% became dislocated
– 13 % partial contact with acetabulum
– 39% located but dysplastic feature
– 22% normal
• because not possible to predict outcome all infants
with instability should be treated
Adults
• Variable
• depends on 2 factors
– well developed false acetabulum ( 24 % chance good result vs
52 % if absent)
– bilaterality
• in absence of false acetabulum patients maintain good ROM with
little disability
• femoral head covered with thick elongated capsule
• false acetabulum increases chances degenerative joint disease
• hyperlordosis of lumbar spine assoc with back pain
• unilateral dislocation has problems
– leg length inequality, knee deformity , scoliosis
and gait disturbance
Dysplasia and Subluxation
• Dysplasia (anatomic and radiographic def’n)
– inadequate dev of acetabulum, femoral head or both
– all subluxated hips are anatomically dysplastic
• radiologically difference between subluxated and dysplastic hip
is disruption of Shenton’s line
– subluxation: line disrupted, head is superiorly,
superolaterally ar laterally
displaced from the medial wall
– dysplasia: line is intact
• important because natural history is different
Natural History Con’t
• Subluxation predictably leads to degenerative joint disease and
clinical disability
– mean age symptom onset 36.6 in females and 54 in men
– severe xray changes 46 in female and 69 in males
• Cooperman
– 32 hips with CE angle < 20 without subluxation
– 22 years all had xray evidence of DJD
– no correlation between angle and rate of development
– concluded that radiologically apparent dysplasia leads to
DJD but process takes decades
Treatment 0 to 6 months
• Goal is obtain reduction and maintain reduction to provide
optimal env’t for femoral head and acetabular development
• Lovell and Winter
– treatment initiated immediately on diagnosis
• AAOS (July,2000)
– subluxation often corrects after 3 weeks and may be
observed without treatment
– if persists on clinical exam or US beyond 3 weeks treatment
indicated
– actual dislocation diagosed at birth treatment should be
immediate
Treatment con’t
• Pavlik Harness preferred
– prevents hip extension and adduction but allows flexion and
abduction which lead to reduction and stabilization
– success 95% if maintained full time six weeks
– > 6 months success < 50% as difficult to maintain active
child in harness
Pavlik Harness
• Chest strap at nipple line
• shoulder straps set to hold
cross strap at this level
• anterior strap flexes hip 100-
110 degrees
• posterior strap prevents
adduction and allow
comfortable abduction
• safe zone arc of abduction
and adduction that is between
redislocation and comfortable
unforced abduction
Pavlik con’t
• Indications include presence of reducible hip femoral head
directed toward triradiate cartilage on xray
• follow weekly intervals by clinical exam and US for two weeks
if not reduced other methods pursued
• once successfully reduced harness continued for childs age at
stability + 3 months
• worn full time for half interval if stability continues and then
weaned off
• end of weaning process xray pelvis obtained and if normal
discontinue harness
Complications
• Failure
– poor compliance , inaccurate position and persistence of
inadequate treatment ( > 2-3- weeks)
– subgroup where failure may be predictable Viere et al
• absent Ortolani sign
• bilateral dislocations
• treatment commenced after age 7 week
– Treatment closed reduction and Spica Casting
• Femoral Nerve Compression 2 to hyperflexion
• Inferior Dislocation
• Skin breakdown
• Avascular Necrosis
6 months to 2 years age
• Closed reduction and spica cast immobilization
recommended
• traction controversial with theoretical benefit of gradual
stretching of soft tissues impeding reduction and neurovascular
bundles to decrease AVN
• skin traction preferred however vary with surgeon
• usually 1-2 weeks
• scientific evidence supporting this is lacking
Treatment con’t
• closed reduction preformed in OR under general anesthetic
manipulation includes flexion, traction and abduction
• percutaneous or open adductor tenotomy necessary in most
cases to increase safe zone which lessen incidence of proximal
femoral growth disturbance
• reduction must be confirmed on arthrogram as large portion of
head and acetabulum are cartilaginous
• dynamic arthrography helps with assessing obstacles to
reduction and adequacy of reduction
Treatment
• reduction maintained in spica cast well molded to greater
trochanter to prevent redislocation
• human position of hyperflexion and limited abduction
preferred
• avoid forced abduction with internal rotation as increased
incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance
• cast in place for 6 weeks then repeat Ct scan to confirm
reduction
• casting continued for 3 months at which point removed and xray
done then placed in abduction orthotic device full time for 2
months then weaned
Failure of Closed Methods
• Open reduction indicated if failure of closed reduction,
persistent subluxation, reducible but unstable other than
extremes of abduction
• variety of approaches
– anterior smith peterson most common
• allows reduction and capsular plication and secondary
procedures
• disadv- > blood loss, damage iliac apophysis and
abductors, stiffness
• greatest rate of acetabular development occurs in
first 18 months after reduction
Open Reduction con’t
– medial approach ( between adductor brevis and magnus)
• approach directly over site of obstacles with minimal soft
tissue dissection
• unable to do capsular plication so depend on cast for post
op stability
– anteromedial approach Ludloff ( between neurovascular
bundle and pectineus)
• direct exposure to obstacles, minimal muscle dissection
• no plication or secondary procedures
• increased incidence of damage to medial femoral
circumflex artery and higher AVN risk
Follow-up
• Abduction orthotic braces commonly used until acetabular
development caught up to normal side
• in assessing development look for accessory ossification centers
to see if cartilage in periphery has potential to ossify
• secondary acetabular procedure rarely indicated < 2 years as
potential for development after closed and open procedures is
excellent and continues for 4-8 years
• most rapid improvement measured by acetabular index ,
development of teardrop occurs in first 18 months after surgery
• femoral anteversion and coxa valga also resolve during this time
Obstacles to Reduction
• Extra- articular
– Iliopsoas tendon
– adductors
• Intra-articular
– inverted hypertrophic labrum
– tranverse acetabular ligament
– pulvinar, ligamentum teres
– constricted anteromedial capsule especially in late
cases
neolimbus is not an obstacle to reduction and represents
epiphyseal cartilage that must not be removed as this
impairs acetabular development
Age greater than 2 years
• Open reduction usually necessary
• age > 3 femoral shortening recommended to avoid excess
pressure on head with reduction
• 54% AVN and 32% redislocation with use of skeletal traction in
ages > 3
• age > 3 recommend open reduction and femoral shortening
and acetabular procedure
Treatment con’t
• 2-3-years gray zone
• potential for acetabular development diminished therefore
many surgeons recommend a concomitant acetabular
procedure with open reduction or 6-8 weeks after
• JBJS Feb, 2002 Salter Innominate Osteotomy…
Bohm,Brzuske incidence of AVN is greater with
simultaneous open reduction and acetabular procedure
Treatment con’t
• Lovell and Winter
– judge stability at time of reduction and if stable observe for period
of time for development
– if not developing properly with decreased acetabular index,
teardrop then consider secondary procedure
• most common osteotomy is Salter or Pemberton
• anatomic deficiency is anterior and Salter provides this
while Pemberton provides anterior and lateral coverage
Natural Sequelae
• Goal of treatment is to have radiographically normal hip at
maturity to prevent DJD
• after reduction achieved potential for development continues
until age 4 after which potential decreases
• child < 4 minimal dysplasia may observe but if severe than
subluxations and residual dysplasias shoild be corrected
• when evaluating persistent dysplasia look at femur and
acetabulum
• DDH deficiency usually acetabular side
Residual Dysplasia
• plain xray with measurement of CE angle and acetabular index
• young children deficiency anterior and adolescents can be
global
• deformities of femoral neck significant if lead to subluxation
– lateral subluxation with extreme coxa valga or anterior
subluxation with excessive anteversion ( defined on CT )
– usually DDH patients have a normal neck shaft angle
• Dysplasia for 2-3-years after reduction proximal
femoral derotation or varus osteotomy should be
considered if excessive anteversion or valgus
• prior to performing these be sure head can be
concentrically reduced on AP view with leg abducted
30 and internally rotated
• varus osteotomy done to redirect head to center of
acetabulum to stimulate normal development
• must be done before age 4 as remodeling potential
goes down after this
Adolescent or Adult
• Femoral osteotomy should only be used in
conjunction with pelvic procedure as no
potential for acetabular growth or
remodeling but changing orientation of
femur shifts the weightbearing portion
• Pelvic osteotomy considerations
– age
– congruent reduction
– range of motion
– degenerative changes
Pelvic Procedures
• Redirectional
– Salter ( hinges on symphysis pubis)
– Sutherland double innominate osteotomy
– Steel ( Triple osteotomy)
– Ganz ( rotational)
• Acetabuloplasties ( decrease volume )
– hinge on triradiate cartilage ( therefore immature
patients)
– Pemberton
– Dega ( posterior coverage in CP patients )
• Salvage
– depend on fibrous metaplasia of capsule
– shelf and Chiari
Complications of Treatment
• Worst complication is disturbance of
growth in proximal femur including the
epiphysis and physeal plate
• commonly AVN however, no pathology to
confirm this may be due to vascular insults
to epiphysis or physeal plate or pressure
injury
• occurrs only in patients that have been
treated and may be seen in opposite normal
hip
Necrosis of Femoral Head
• Extremes of position in abduction ( greater
60 degrees ) and abduction with internal
rotation
• compression on medial circumflex artery as
passes the iliopsoas tendon and
compression of the terminal branch between
lateral neck and acetabulum
• “ frog leg position “ uniformly results in
proximal growth disturbance
• extreme position can also cause pressure
necrosis onf epiphyseal cartilage and
physeal plate
• severin method can obtain reduction but
very high incidence of necrosis
• multiple classification systems with Salter
most popular
Salter Classification
• 1 failure of appearance of ossific nucleus
within 1 year of reduction2
• 2 failure of growth of an existing nucleus
within 1 year
• 3 broadening of femoral neck within 1
year
• 4 increased xray density then
fragmentation of head
• 5 residual deformity of head when re-
ossification complete including coxa
magna,vara and short neck
Kalamachi
• Classified growth disturbances assoc with
various degrees of physeal arrest
• 1 all disturbances not assoc with physis
• 2 lateral physeal arrest ( most common )
• 3 central physeal arrest
• 4 medial physeal arrest
• longterm follow up shows that necrosis of
femoral head decreases longevity of hip
Treatment
• Femoral and/or acetabular osteotomy to
maintain reduction and shift areas of
pressure
• trochanteric overgrowth causing an
abductor lurch treated with greater
trochanter physeal arrest if done before age
8 otherwise distal transfer
• early detection is key with 95% success rate
of treatment
• identify growth disturbance lines
SALTERS
PEMBERTONS
PEMBERTONS
CHIARI
Developmental dysplasiahip
Developmental dysplasiahip

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2
The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2
The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2Libin Thomas
 
total hip replacement discussion
total hip replacement    discussiontotal hip replacement    discussion
total hip replacement discussionDr ashwani panchal
 
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and Pelvis
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and PelvisSurgical Approaches to Acetabulum and Pelvis
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and PelvisBijay Mehta
 
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fractures
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fracturesTalus anatomy, blood supply & fractures
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fracturesHiren Divecha
 
Principles of external fixation
Principles of external fixationPrinciples of external fixation
Principles of external fixationSiddhartha Sinha
 
Principles of fracture fixation
Principles of fracture fixationPrinciples of fracture fixation
Principles of fracture fixationAhmad Sulong
 
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAH
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAHDDH BY DR AJAY SHAH
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAHAjay Shah
 
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fracturesModified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fracturesPonnilavan Ponz
 
Principle of tension band wiring n its application
Principle of tension band wiring n its applicationPrinciple of tension band wiring n its application
Principle of tension band wiring n its applicationRohit Kansal
 
Poller or blocking screw
Poller or blocking screwPoller or blocking screw
Poller or blocking screwAvik Sarkar
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2
The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2
The hip in cerebral palsy part 1 of 2
 
total hip replacement discussion
total hip replacement    discussiontotal hip replacement    discussion
total hip replacement discussion
 
Dhs principles
Dhs principlesDhs principles
Dhs principles
 
Dynamic hip screw
Dynamic hip screwDynamic hip screw
Dynamic hip screw
 
dynamic hip screw
dynamic hip screwdynamic hip screw
dynamic hip screw
 
Locking plates
Locking platesLocking plates
Locking plates
 
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and Pelvis
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and PelvisSurgical Approaches to Acetabulum and Pelvis
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and Pelvis
 
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fractures
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fracturesTalus anatomy, blood supply & fractures
Talus anatomy, blood supply & fractures
 
Principles of external fixation
Principles of external fixationPrinciples of external fixation
Principles of external fixation
 
Principles of fracture fixation
Principles of fracture fixationPrinciples of fracture fixation
Principles of fracture fixation
 
pediatric hip dioerders
pediatric hip dioerderspediatric hip dioerders
pediatric hip dioerders
 
Poller screw
Poller screwPoller screw
Poller screw
 
Pilon fracture
Pilon fracture Pilon fracture
Pilon fracture
 
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAH
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAHDDH BY DR AJAY SHAH
DDH BY DR AJAY SHAH
 
Pes planus
Pes planusPes planus
Pes planus
 
Floating Knee
Floating KneeFloating Knee
Floating Knee
 
Cubitus varus
Cubitus varusCubitus varus
Cubitus varus
 
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fracturesModified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures
Modified sauve kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures
 
Principle of tension band wiring n its application
Principle of tension band wiring n its applicationPrinciple of tension band wiring n its application
Principle of tension band wiring n its application
 
Poller or blocking screw
Poller or blocking screwPoller or blocking screw
Poller or blocking screw
 

Andere mochten auch

Developmental Dysplasia of hip
Developmental Dysplasia of hip Developmental Dysplasia of hip
Developmental Dysplasia of hip Prasanna Durai
 
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.Abdellah Nazeer
 
developemental dysplasia of hip
developemental dysplasia of hipdevelopemental dysplasia of hip
developemental dysplasia of hipHardik Pawar
 
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasound
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and UltrasoundDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasound
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasoundhungnguyenthien
 
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHORDevlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHORDR.Naveen Rathor
 
Developmental displasia of hip
Developmental displasia of hipDevelopmental displasia of hip
Developmental displasia of hipPriyesh Jaiswal
 
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hipThe reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hipLove2jaipal
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipArshad Shaikh
 
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeFemoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeJayant Sharma
 
Developmental Dysplasia of Hip
Developmental Dysplasia of HipDevelopmental Dysplasia of Hip
Developmental Dysplasia of HipDaniel Augustine
 
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbow
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbowElbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbow
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbowJayant Sharma
 
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersBladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersJayant Sharma
 
Management of compund fractures
Management of compund fracturesManagement of compund fractures
Management of compund fracturesJayant Sharma
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
Developmental Dysplasia of hip
Developmental Dysplasia of hip Developmental Dysplasia of hip
Developmental Dysplasia of hip
 
DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.
Presentation1, radiological imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.
 
Ddh 1
Ddh 1Ddh 1
Ddh 1
 
DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
developemental dysplasia of hip
developemental dysplasia of hipdevelopemental dysplasia of hip
developemental dysplasia of hip
 
DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasound
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and UltrasoundDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasound
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Ultrasound
 
Physiotherapy final
Physiotherapy finalPhysiotherapy final
Physiotherapy final
 
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHORDevlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Devlopmental dysplasia of hip(DDH) by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
 
Developmental displasia of hip
Developmental displasia of hipDevelopmental displasia of hip
Developmental displasia of hip
 
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hipThe reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hip
 
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeFemoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
 
Developmental Dysplasia of Hip
Developmental Dysplasia of HipDevelopmental Dysplasia of Hip
Developmental Dysplasia of Hip
 
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbow
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbowElbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbow
Elbow Arhtrolysis for stiff elbow
 
Sutures
SuturesSutures
Sutures
 
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersBladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
 
Management of compund fractures
Management of compund fracturesManagement of compund fractures
Management of compund fractures
 

Ähnlich wie Developmental dysplasiahip

Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1mohdzh00
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1mohdzh00
 
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overview
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overviewDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip overview
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overviewtamerfayyad2001
 
Topicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfff
TopicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfffTopicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfff
Topicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfffrasoolmohammedomar1
 
Developmental dysplasia hip
Developmental dysplasia hipDevelopmental dysplasia hip
Developmental dysplasia hipAnuChalise
 
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.ppt
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.pptDDH and Vertibral coloumn.ppt
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.pptIrfanNashad1
 
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptx
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptxclub-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptx
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptxaasthasubedi3
 
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limb
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limbCongenital anomalies of upper and lower limb
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limbMohammad azharuddin
 
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptx
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptxReferat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptx
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptxReza Hambali
 
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHip
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHipDevelopmentalDysplasiaHip
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHipdhavalshah4424
 
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.ppt
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.pptUnit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.ppt
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.pptuk581147
 
Cerebral palsy assessment and management (PT) case presentation
Cerebral palsy assessment and  management (PT) case presentation Cerebral palsy assessment and  management (PT) case presentation
Cerebral palsy assessment and management (PT) case presentation Meet Desai
 

Ähnlich wie Developmental dysplasiahip (20)

Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
Developmental dysplasia of hip 1
 
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overview
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overviewDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip overview
Developmental dysplasia of the hip overview
 
Topicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfff
TopicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfffTopicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfff
Topicshhgddrtuujbfddryuijnnbvvdddrtyujjbvgfff
 
DDH.ppt
DDH.pptDDH.ppt
DDH.ppt
 
Developmental dysplasia hip
Developmental dysplasia hipDevelopmental dysplasia hip
Developmental dysplasia hip
 
Congenital hip dysplasia
Congenital hip dysplasiaCongenital hip dysplasia
Congenital hip dysplasia
 
Dr charan ddh
Dr charan ddhDr charan ddh
Dr charan ddh
 
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.ppt
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.pptDDH and Vertibral coloumn.ppt
DDH and Vertibral coloumn.ppt
 
Craniosynostosis
CraniosynostosisCraniosynostosis
Craniosynostosis
 
Orthopedic problems in neonates
Orthopedic problems in neonatesOrthopedic problems in neonates
Orthopedic problems in neonates
 
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptx
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptxclub-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptx
club-foot in children pediatric nursing.pptx
 
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limb
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limbCongenital anomalies of upper and lower limb
Congenital anomalies of upper and lower limb
 
DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
DDH
DDHDDH
DDH
 
Ddh
DdhDdh
Ddh
 
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptx
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptxReferat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptx
Referat pedi I-Anggrian-HYPOPLASIA OF FEMUR.pptx
 
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHip
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHipDevelopmentalDysplasiaHip
DevelopmentalDysplasiaHip
 
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.ppt
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.pptUnit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.ppt
Unit 1_ Genetic Disorders, Part 2, Educational Platform.ppt
 
Cerebral palsy assessment and management (PT) case presentation
Cerebral palsy assessment and  management (PT) case presentation Cerebral palsy assessment and  management (PT) case presentation
Cerebral palsy assessment and management (PT) case presentation
 

Mehr von Jayant Sharma

Fractures and fracture healing
Fractures and fracture healingFractures and fracture healing
Fractures and fracture healingJayant Sharma
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeJayant Sharma
 
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixator
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixatorFracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixator
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixatorJayant Sharma
 
Fracture proximal humerus
Fracture proximal humerusFracture proximal humerus
Fracture proximal humerusJayant Sharma
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeJayant Sharma
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeJayant Sharma
 
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeFemoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeJayant Sharma
 
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersBladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersJayant Sharma
 
Tibialis posterior insufficiency
Tibialis posterior insufficiencyTibialis posterior insufficiency
Tibialis posterior insufficiencyJayant Sharma
 

Mehr von Jayant Sharma (14)

Spine biomechanics2
Spine biomechanics2Spine biomechanics2
Spine biomechanics2
 
Fractures and fracture healing
Fractures and fracture healingFractures and fracture healing
Fractures and fracture healing
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndrome
 
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixator
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixatorFracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixator
Fracture proximal humerus Fixation with K wires and External fixator
 
External fixators
External fixatorsExternal fixators
External fixators
 
Fracture proximal humerus
Fracture proximal humerusFracture proximal humerus
Fracture proximal humerus
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndrome
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndrome
 
Piriformis syndrome
Piriformis syndromePiriformis syndrome
Piriformis syndrome
 
Gait
GaitGait
Gait
 
Talar fractures2
Talar fractures2Talar fractures2
Talar fractures2
 
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndromeFemoro acetabular impingement syndrome
Femoro acetabular impingement syndrome
 
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disordersBladder involvement in spine disorders
Bladder involvement in spine disorders
 
Tibialis posterior insufficiency
Tibialis posterior insufficiencyTibialis posterior insufficiency
Tibialis posterior insufficiency
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptxThe next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptxTina Purnat
 
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️saminamagar
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Mohamed Rizk Khodair
 
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdfPULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.ANJALI
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...saminamagar
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisGolden Helix
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxdrashraf369
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners
 
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptApiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptkedirjemalharun
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxdrashraf369
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurNavdeep Kaur
 
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?bkling
 
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPresentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPrerana Jadhav
 
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxPOST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxvirengeeta
 
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
 
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptxThe next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
 
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in paharganj DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
 
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdfPULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
 
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptApiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
 
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
 
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPresentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
 
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxPOST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
 
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
 

Developmental dysplasiahip

  • 1. Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip JAYANT SHARMA M.S, DNB, MNAMS.
  • 2. Definition DDH is a spectrum of disorders. Hip can be • Dislocated • Dislocatable • Subluxatable • Dysplastic
  • 3. • Previously known as congenital dislocation of the hip implying a condition that existed at birth • developmental encompasses embryonic, fetal and infantile periods • includes congenital dislocation and developmental hip problems including subluxation, dislocation and dysplasia
  • 4. Normal Growth and Development • Embryologically the acetabulum, femoral head develop from the same primitive mesenchymal cells • cleft develops in precartilaginous cells at 7th week and this defines both structures • 11wk hip joint fully formed • acetabular growth continues throughout intrauterine life with development of labrum • birth femoral head deeply seated in acetabulum by surface tension of synovial fluid and very difficult to dislocate • in DDH this shape and tension is abnormal in addition to capsular laxity
  • 5. • The cartilage complex is 3D with triradiate medially and cup-shaped laterally • interposed between ilium above and ischium below and pubis anteriorly • acetabular cartilage forms outer 2/3 cavity and the non-articular medial wall form by triradiate cartilage which is the common physis of these three bones • fibrocartilaginous labrum forms at margin of acetabular cartilage and joint capsule inserts just above its rim
  • 6. • articular cartilage covers portion articulating with femoral head opposite side is a growth plate with degenerating cells facing towards the pelvic bone it opposes • triradiate cartilage is triphalanged with each side of each limb having a growth plate which allows interstitial growth within the cartilage causing expansion of hip joint diameter during growth • In the infant the greater trochanter, proximal femur and intertrochanteric portion is cartilage • 4-7 months proximal ossification center appears which enlarges along cartilaginous anlage until adult life when only thin layer of articular cartilage persists
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. Development contd. • Experimental studies in humans with unreduced hips suggest the main stimulus for concave shape of the acetabulum is presence of spherical head • for normal depth of acetabulum to increase several factors play a role – spherical femoral head – normal appositional growth within cartilage – periosteal new bone formation in adjacent pelvic bones – development of three secondary ossification centers • normal growth and development occur through balanced growth of proximal femur, acetabulum and triradiate cartilages and the adjacent bones
  • 10. At Birth • Teratological Dislocation occurs in – Arthrogryposis – Neuromuscular disorders – Diastrophic Dwarfism • Typical DDH – Child is otherwise normal – This presentation is about DDH in an otherwise normal child
  • 11. Aetiology is Multifactorial • Environmental & Mechanical – Breech Presentation DDH Cases (16%): All deliveries (3%) – Birth Order >50% Cases 1st. Born – Oligohydramnios – Sex Ratio (Relaxin) F(4 - 6) : M(1) – Side L(2) : R(1) – Bilateral 35 % – Nursing Habits
  • 12. Aetiology- Breech • Only 3% of children are Breech presentation • 16% of DDH cases are breech • Extended breech has 20% risk of DDH • Footling breech 2% • If have LSCS still at risk
  • 13. Aetiology-Ligamentous Laxity • Maternal Relaxin hormones crosses the placenta and induce hip capsule laxity in infant and this effect is much stronger in females.
  • 14. Aetiology - Genetic Factors • Genetic – There is an unknown genetic factor – Runs in families – Risk to next child increases as follows: • If one child is affected risk is 6% • Parent 10%, • Parent and child 36% • Genetic Predisposition (Wynne Davies) – Families with Generalised Ligament Laxity – Families with Acetabular Dysplasia
  • 15. Aetiology- Nursing • Rare in China, Asia, Africa (carry children with hips flexed and abducted) • High in native American (Used to nurse with legs extended) • Klisic reduced DDH by 65% in Belgrade by routine use of abduction diapering
  • 16. Associated conditions Quoted risk of DDH with following conditions: • Child with Torticollis* 15-20% • Metatarsus adductus 10% • Calcaneovalgus 10% *Hummer C, MacEwenG:The coexistence of torticollis and congenital dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54-A:1255.
  • 17. • Breech positioning • Family history (Treatment with Harness/Spica/Surgery, not double nappies) • Foot deformity • Infantile muscular torticollis • ?Oligohydramnios Risk Factors
  • 18. Etiology • Genetic and ethnic • increased native Americans but very low in southern Chinese and Africans • positive family history 12-33% • 10x risk if affected parent, 7X if sibling • intrauterine factors – breech position ( normal pop’n 2-4% , DDH 17-23% ) – oligohydroamnios – neuromuscular conditions like myelomeningocele • high association with intrauterine molding abnormalities including metatarsus adductus and torticollis • first born • female baby ( 80% cases) • left hip more common
  • 19. Epidemiology • 1 in 100 newborns examined have evidence of instability ( positive Barlow or Ortolani) • 1 in 1000 live births true dislocation • most detectable at birth in nursery • Barlow stated that 60% stabilize in 1st week and 88% stabilize in first 2 months without treatment remaining 12% true dislocations and persist without treatment • Coleman26% become dislocated, 13% partial contact 39% located but dysplatic features 22% normal
  • 20. Incidence• Caucasians – 1.7/1000 Von Rosen, 1962 – 1.5/1000 Barlow, 1962 • Native Americans – 188.5/1000 Walker, 1973 • Native Africans – 0/1000 Edelstein, 1966 • Chinese – 0.1/1000 Hoagland, 1981
  • 21. Incidence • 1-2/1000 Live births • Hip instability (phys) at birth: 1-2% • Barlow JBJS1962 – 1 in 60 born with instability – 60% resolve in the 1st week – 88% resolve in 1st 2 months – Remaining 12% are true dislocations ~1.5/1000
  • 22. DDH --PATHOLOGY • Tight fit between head and acetabulum is absent and head can glide in and out of acetabulum • hypertrophied ridge of acetabular cartilage in superior, posterior and inferior aspects of acetabulum called “ neolimbus” • often a trough or grove in this cartilage due to pressure from femoral head or neck • 98% DDH that occur around or at birth have these changes and are reversible in the newborn • 2% newborns with teratologic or antenatal dislocations and no syndrome have these changes
  • 23.
  • 24. • Development in treated DDH different from normal hip • goal is to reduce the femoral head ASAP to provide the stimulus for acetabular development • if concentric reduction is maintained potential for recovery and resumption of normal growth
  • 25. • Age at which DDH hip can still return to normal is controversial depends on –age at reduction –growth potential of acetabulum –damage to acetabulum from head or during reduction
  • 26. • Accessory centers seen in 2-3% normal hips however in treated DDH seen up to 60% appearing ages 6 months to 10 years ( should look for these on radiographs to indicate continued growth)
  • 27. Diagnosis • Clinical risk factors • Physical exam – Ortolani Test • hip flexion and abduction , trochanter elevated and femoral head glides into acetabulum – Barlow Test • provocative test where hip flexed and adducted and head palpated to exit the acetabulum partially or completely over a rim – some base there treatment on whether ortolani+ versus Barlow+ feeling Barlow + more stable – Lovell and Winter make no distinction – 2% extreme complete irreducible teratologic disloactions assoc with other conditions like arthrogyposis
  • 28.
  • 29. Late Diagnosis • Secondary adaptive changes occur • limitation of abduction due to adductor longus shortening • Galleazi sign – flex both hips and one side shows apparent femoral shortening • asymmetry gluteal, thigh or labial folds • limb-length inequailty • waddling gait and hyperlordosis in bilateral cases
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. Screening for DDH • Controversial • Methods – Clinical – U.S. Scan – Selective vs. Universal Ultrasound screening programme
  • 33. Aim of screening • Early detection leads to: – simple treatment, less duration, more favourable results, less complications. • Reduces late presentation • Reduces surgical intervention
  • 34. Clinical screening • Introduced in 1969 • Updated in 1986 (SMAC) • Standard programme – Barlow’s/Ortolani’s tests done on every child at birth and then at 6-8 weeks. • Continued surveillance until walking normally
  • 35. Clinical screening • Barlow’s/Ortolani’s Tests – Specificity- 100% – Sensitivity- 60% Because of low sensitivity: – False-positive test results in Over-treatment – False negative test results in Late-presentation
  • 36. Ultrasound Screening • High Specificity and Sensitivity: >90% • Helps in diagnosis of not only Subluxated/ Dislocated hips but also Dysplastic hips
  • 37. Ultrasound • Helps in accurate diagnosis • Helps in Monitoring the treatment • Reduces the need for Arthrograms / Xrays.
  • 38. Ultrasound Screening • Techniques: 1) Static (Graf)* 2) Dynamic (Harcke)** 3) Combination *JPO 1983; 3: 354-95 **JBJS 1985;67B: 406-12
  • 39. Screening Programme • Selective- Only High risk group of infants is referred- More common in UK • Population (Universal or Routine)- All infants are referred for Ultrasound- More common in European countries
  • 40. Indications for selective screening • Clicky hip (B/O)? (Clunk) • Breech • Pos. Family History - Harness/Spica/Surgery (not double nappies) • Sternomastoid tumour/ Torticollis • Foot deformities • ?Oligohydramnios
  • 41. Other reasons for referral after first few weeks • Asymmetric skin folds (not very good indicator on its own) • Limited Abduction • Leg length discrepancy – May be only signs later until abnormal gait is noticed when walking (too late)
  • 42. Selective hip screening clinic • General Examination: -Plagiocephaly, -Sternomastoid Tumour (Torticollis), -Spine for cutaneous manifastations of dyspharism -Feet for any congenital deformity
  • 43. Selective Hip screening clinic • Hip Examination -Barlow’s test (<3-4 months of age) -Ortolani’s test (<3-4 months of age) -Limitation of Abduction -Leg length discrepancy (Galleazi test) -Asymmetry of thigh folds - Limp in a walking child
  • 44. Selective Hip screening clinic • Children <6 months have ultrasound using Graf classification system Class Alpha angle Description I >60 Normal II 60-43 Immature/Dysplastic III <43 Subluxed/Dislocated IV Unmeasurable Dislocated • Children >6 months have Xrays.
  • 45. Radiography • Ultra sound • morphologic assessment and dynamic – anatomical characteristics • alpha angle: slope of superior aspect bony acetabulum • beta angle: cartilaginous component (problems with inter and intraobserver error ) – dynamic • observe what occurs with Barlow and ortolani testing • indications controversial due to high levels of overdiagnosis and not currently recommended as a routine screening tool other than in high risk patients • best indication is to assess treatment – guided reduction of dislocated hip or check reduction and stability during Pavlik harness treatment
  • 46. Radiography con’td • newborn period DDH not a radiographic diagnosis and should be made by clinical exam • after newborn period diagnosis should be confirmed by xray • several measurements • treatment decisions should be based on changes in measurements
  • 47. Radiological Diagnosis • Classic Features – increased acetabular index ( n=27, >30-35 dysplasia) – disruption shenton line ( after age 3-4 should be intact on all views) – absent tear drop sign – delayed appearance ossific nucleus and decreased femoral head coverage – failure medial metaphyseal beak of proximal femur , secondary ossification center to be located in lower inner quadrant – center-edge angle useful after age 5 ( < 20) when can see ossific nucleus
  • 48. Pe
  • 49.
  • 50. Natural History in Newborns • Barlow – 1 in 60 infants have instability ( positive Barlow) – 60% stabilize in 1st week – 88% stabilize in 2 months without treatment – 12 % become true dislocations and persist • Coleman – 23 hips < 3 months – 26% became dislocated – 13 % partial contact with acetabulum – 39% located but dysplastic feature – 22% normal • because not possible to predict outcome all infants with instability should be treated
  • 51. Adults • Variable • depends on 2 factors – well developed false acetabulum ( 24 % chance good result vs 52 % if absent) – bilaterality • in absence of false acetabulum patients maintain good ROM with little disability • femoral head covered with thick elongated capsule • false acetabulum increases chances degenerative joint disease • hyperlordosis of lumbar spine assoc with back pain • unilateral dislocation has problems – leg length inequality, knee deformity , scoliosis and gait disturbance
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55. Dysplasia and Subluxation • Dysplasia (anatomic and radiographic def’n) – inadequate dev of acetabulum, femoral head or both – all subluxated hips are anatomically dysplastic • radiologically difference between subluxated and dysplastic hip is disruption of Shenton’s line – subluxation: line disrupted, head is superiorly, superolaterally ar laterally displaced from the medial wall – dysplasia: line is intact • important because natural history is different
  • 56.
  • 57. Natural History Con’t • Subluxation predictably leads to degenerative joint disease and clinical disability – mean age symptom onset 36.6 in females and 54 in men – severe xray changes 46 in female and 69 in males • Cooperman – 32 hips with CE angle < 20 without subluxation – 22 years all had xray evidence of DJD – no correlation between angle and rate of development – concluded that radiologically apparent dysplasia leads to DJD but process takes decades
  • 58. Treatment 0 to 6 months • Goal is obtain reduction and maintain reduction to provide optimal env’t for femoral head and acetabular development • Lovell and Winter – treatment initiated immediately on diagnosis • AAOS (July,2000) – subluxation often corrects after 3 weeks and may be observed without treatment – if persists on clinical exam or US beyond 3 weeks treatment indicated – actual dislocation diagosed at birth treatment should be immediate
  • 59. Treatment con’t • Pavlik Harness preferred – prevents hip extension and adduction but allows flexion and abduction which lead to reduction and stabilization – success 95% if maintained full time six weeks – > 6 months success < 50% as difficult to maintain active child in harness
  • 60. Pavlik Harness • Chest strap at nipple line • shoulder straps set to hold cross strap at this level • anterior strap flexes hip 100- 110 degrees • posterior strap prevents adduction and allow comfortable abduction • safe zone arc of abduction and adduction that is between redislocation and comfortable unforced abduction
  • 61. Pavlik con’t • Indications include presence of reducible hip femoral head directed toward triradiate cartilage on xray • follow weekly intervals by clinical exam and US for two weeks if not reduced other methods pursued • once successfully reduced harness continued for childs age at stability + 3 months • worn full time for half interval if stability continues and then weaned off • end of weaning process xray pelvis obtained and if normal discontinue harness
  • 62. Complications • Failure – poor compliance , inaccurate position and persistence of inadequate treatment ( > 2-3- weeks) – subgroup where failure may be predictable Viere et al • absent Ortolani sign • bilateral dislocations • treatment commenced after age 7 week – Treatment closed reduction and Spica Casting • Femoral Nerve Compression 2 to hyperflexion • Inferior Dislocation • Skin breakdown • Avascular Necrosis
  • 63. 6 months to 2 years age • Closed reduction and spica cast immobilization recommended • traction controversial with theoretical benefit of gradual stretching of soft tissues impeding reduction and neurovascular bundles to decrease AVN • skin traction preferred however vary with surgeon • usually 1-2 weeks • scientific evidence supporting this is lacking
  • 64. Treatment con’t • closed reduction preformed in OR under general anesthetic manipulation includes flexion, traction and abduction • percutaneous or open adductor tenotomy necessary in most cases to increase safe zone which lessen incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance • reduction must be confirmed on arthrogram as large portion of head and acetabulum are cartilaginous • dynamic arthrography helps with assessing obstacles to reduction and adequacy of reduction
  • 65. Treatment • reduction maintained in spica cast well molded to greater trochanter to prevent redislocation • human position of hyperflexion and limited abduction preferred • avoid forced abduction with internal rotation as increased incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance • cast in place for 6 weeks then repeat Ct scan to confirm reduction • casting continued for 3 months at which point removed and xray done then placed in abduction orthotic device full time for 2 months then weaned
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68. Failure of Closed Methods • Open reduction indicated if failure of closed reduction, persistent subluxation, reducible but unstable other than extremes of abduction • variety of approaches – anterior smith peterson most common • allows reduction and capsular plication and secondary procedures • disadv- > blood loss, damage iliac apophysis and abductors, stiffness
  • 69. • greatest rate of acetabular development occurs in first 18 months after reduction
  • 70. Open Reduction con’t – medial approach ( between adductor brevis and magnus) • approach directly over site of obstacles with minimal soft tissue dissection • unable to do capsular plication so depend on cast for post op stability – anteromedial approach Ludloff ( between neurovascular bundle and pectineus) • direct exposure to obstacles, minimal muscle dissection • no plication or secondary procedures • increased incidence of damage to medial femoral circumflex artery and higher AVN risk
  • 71. Follow-up • Abduction orthotic braces commonly used until acetabular development caught up to normal side • in assessing development look for accessory ossification centers to see if cartilage in periphery has potential to ossify • secondary acetabular procedure rarely indicated < 2 years as potential for development after closed and open procedures is excellent and continues for 4-8 years • most rapid improvement measured by acetabular index , development of teardrop occurs in first 18 months after surgery • femoral anteversion and coxa valga also resolve during this time
  • 72. Obstacles to Reduction • Extra- articular – Iliopsoas tendon – adductors • Intra-articular – inverted hypertrophic labrum – tranverse acetabular ligament – pulvinar, ligamentum teres – constricted anteromedial capsule especially in late cases neolimbus is not an obstacle to reduction and represents epiphyseal cartilage that must not be removed as this impairs acetabular development
  • 73. Age greater than 2 years • Open reduction usually necessary • age > 3 femoral shortening recommended to avoid excess pressure on head with reduction • 54% AVN and 32% redislocation with use of skeletal traction in ages > 3 • age > 3 recommend open reduction and femoral shortening and acetabular procedure
  • 74. Treatment con’t • 2-3-years gray zone • potential for acetabular development diminished therefore many surgeons recommend a concomitant acetabular procedure with open reduction or 6-8 weeks after • JBJS Feb, 2002 Salter Innominate Osteotomy… Bohm,Brzuske incidence of AVN is greater with simultaneous open reduction and acetabular procedure
  • 75. Treatment con’t • Lovell and Winter – judge stability at time of reduction and if stable observe for period of time for development – if not developing properly with decreased acetabular index, teardrop then consider secondary procedure • most common osteotomy is Salter or Pemberton • anatomic deficiency is anterior and Salter provides this while Pemberton provides anterior and lateral coverage
  • 76. Natural Sequelae • Goal of treatment is to have radiographically normal hip at maturity to prevent DJD • after reduction achieved potential for development continues until age 4 after which potential decreases • child < 4 minimal dysplasia may observe but if severe than subluxations and residual dysplasias shoild be corrected • when evaluating persistent dysplasia look at femur and acetabulum • DDH deficiency usually acetabular side
  • 77. Residual Dysplasia • plain xray with measurement of CE angle and acetabular index • young children deficiency anterior and adolescents can be global • deformities of femoral neck significant if lead to subluxation – lateral subluxation with extreme coxa valga or anterior subluxation with excessive anteversion ( defined on CT ) – usually DDH patients have a normal neck shaft angle
  • 78. • Dysplasia for 2-3-years after reduction proximal femoral derotation or varus osteotomy should be considered if excessive anteversion or valgus • prior to performing these be sure head can be concentrically reduced on AP view with leg abducted 30 and internally rotated • varus osteotomy done to redirect head to center of acetabulum to stimulate normal development • must be done before age 4 as remodeling potential goes down after this
  • 79. Adolescent or Adult • Femoral osteotomy should only be used in conjunction with pelvic procedure as no potential for acetabular growth or remodeling but changing orientation of femur shifts the weightbearing portion • Pelvic osteotomy considerations – age – congruent reduction – range of motion – degenerative changes
  • 80. Pelvic Procedures • Redirectional – Salter ( hinges on symphysis pubis) – Sutherland double innominate osteotomy – Steel ( Triple osteotomy) – Ganz ( rotational) • Acetabuloplasties ( decrease volume ) – hinge on triradiate cartilage ( therefore immature patients) – Pemberton – Dega ( posterior coverage in CP patients ) • Salvage – depend on fibrous metaplasia of capsule – shelf and Chiari
  • 81. Complications of Treatment • Worst complication is disturbance of growth in proximal femur including the epiphysis and physeal plate • commonly AVN however, no pathology to confirm this may be due to vascular insults to epiphysis or physeal plate or pressure injury • occurrs only in patients that have been treated and may be seen in opposite normal hip
  • 82. Necrosis of Femoral Head • Extremes of position in abduction ( greater 60 degrees ) and abduction with internal rotation • compression on medial circumflex artery as passes the iliopsoas tendon and compression of the terminal branch between lateral neck and acetabulum • “ frog leg position “ uniformly results in proximal growth disturbance
  • 83. • extreme position can also cause pressure necrosis onf epiphyseal cartilage and physeal plate • severin method can obtain reduction but very high incidence of necrosis • multiple classification systems with Salter most popular
  • 84. Salter Classification • 1 failure of appearance of ossific nucleus within 1 year of reduction2 • 2 failure of growth of an existing nucleus within 1 year • 3 broadening of femoral neck within 1 year • 4 increased xray density then fragmentation of head • 5 residual deformity of head when re- ossification complete including coxa magna,vara and short neck
  • 85. Kalamachi • Classified growth disturbances assoc with various degrees of physeal arrest • 1 all disturbances not assoc with physis • 2 lateral physeal arrest ( most common ) • 3 central physeal arrest • 4 medial physeal arrest • longterm follow up shows that necrosis of femoral head decreases longevity of hip
  • 86. Treatment • Femoral and/or acetabular osteotomy to maintain reduction and shift areas of pressure • trochanteric overgrowth causing an abductor lurch treated with greater trochanter physeal arrest if done before age 8 otherwise distal transfer • early detection is key with 95% success rate of treatment • identify growth disturbance lines