Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Curriculum development models_and_docume

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 22 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Andere mochten auch (20)

Anzeige

Ähnlich wie Curriculum development models_and_docume (20)

Aktuellste (20)

Anzeige

Curriculum development models_and_docume

  1. 1. Curriculum development models and documents RAWEZH IBRAHIM 20132232 Cyprus International University
  2. 2. Curriculum evaluation • The process of assessing the degree of achievement of education objectives, teaching-learning process and testing situations. • It helps teachers judge whether a curriculum or instructional approach is being implemented as planned, and to assess the extent to which stated goals and objectives are being achieved. (Demiral’s glossary)
  3. 3. CORE ACTIVATION IN CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT Analyse Design Development Implementation 10/11/2014 3 Evaluatio n (Thijs and Akker, 15)
  4. 4. PRESCRIPTIVE VS. DESCRIPTIVE MODELS • Prescriptive Models suggest a linear or cyclical sequence. • Descriptive Models wherein they only describe the process of developing the curriculum. 10/11/2014 4
  5. 5. Models • TheTaba Model • TheTyler Model • TheTaba-Tyler Model • Curriculum Development According to the Systems Approach 10/11/2014 5
  6. 6. TheTaba Model- Grass-roots rational • HildaTaba followed the grass-roots approach in developing curriculum. • She believed in an inductive approach to curriculum development. For her, it should be the teachers who should design the curriculum rather than the higher authorities. 10/11/2014 6
  7. 7. Sven major steps- teachers would have major input • Step 1: Diagnose of needs: The teacher (curriculum designer) starts the process by identifying the needs of the students for whom the curriculum is to be designed. • Step 2: Formulation of objectives: After the teacher has identified needs that require attention, he specifies objectives to be accomplished. 10/11/2014 7
  8. 8. • Step 3: Selection of content: The objectives selected or created suggest the subject matter or content of the curriculum.Objectives and content should be match. • Step 4: Organization of content: A teacher cannot just select the content, but must organize in some type of sequence, taking learner maturity into consideration, learners academic achievements and their interests. 10/11/2014 8
  9. 9. • Step 5: Selection of learning experience: Content must be presented to students and they must engage the content. Here, the teacher selects instructional methods that will involve the students with the content. 10/11/2014 9
  10. 10. • Step 6: Organization of learning experience: As content must be sequenced and organized; the learning activities, too. Step 7: Evaluation and means of evaluation: The curriculum planner must determine just what objectives have been accomplished. Evaluation procedures need to be considered by the teacher and students. 10/11/2014 10
  11. 11. Tyler’s Rational – Linear Approach Tyler’s rationale revolves around four central questions.They need be answered if the process of curriculum development is to proceed: 10/11/2014 11 (Bllack and Kliebard, 57 and Lunenburg,2)
  12. 12. Stages What educational purposes should the school seek to attain? What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these purposes? How can these educational experiences be effectively organized? How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained? Setting objectives Learning experience and content Organizing Learning experience and content Evaluation (Khwaja,7)10/11/2014 12
  13. 13. Four basic principles Subject matter Society Sources Learner Tentative objectives Screens Philosophy Psychology Selecting experiences Evaluation (Mesa,2) 10/11/2014 13
  14. 14. Differences between Taba and Tyler models Taba Tyler Inductive Deductive Taba’s reflects the teacher’s approach; believes that the teachers are aware of the students needs; hence teachers should be the ones to develop the curriculum and implement in practice. Argues from the administrator approach; believes that administration should design the curriculum and the teachers implement it. Pays attention to the selection of the content and its organization with an aim to provide students with an opportunity to learn with comprehension. Lays the main stress on aims, evaluation and control. (Läänemets and Ruubel, 3-4) 10/11/2014 14
  15. 15. TheTaba-Tyler Model • This model is often referred to as the Rational Planning Model, because it is rational to the specify ends before engaging in any given activity. 10/11/2014 15
  16. 16. Start Statement of general goals Diagnosis of needs Formulation of objectives Selection of content Organization of content Selection of learning experiences Organization of learning experiences Evaluation Satisfactory Formulation detailed procedure Implement procedure End 10/11/2014 16 Yes No
  17. 17. Curriculum Development According to the Systems Approach • The systems approach to the design and analysis of teaching/learning situations is the basis of the great majority of modern educational technology-related developments (Rajasekar, 1). • Evaluation or program assessment is a system approach is closely tied to program objectives. • It is critical to know to what extend each of the objectives has been accomplished and often to what cost (Combs, 308). 10/11/2014 17
  18. 18. A typical system Interactions between components or sub-systems B C D A 10/11/2014 18 Output from system into another system Input to system (Rajasekar, 1)
  19. 19. 10/11/2014 19 Consider target population characteristics and topic area Estimate relevant existing skills and knowledge of learners Formulate objectives/learning outcomes Select appropriate instructional methods Operate course or curriculum Assess and evaluate
  20. 20. Evaluation documents • Evaluation checklist • Textbook evaluation checklist • Student questionnaires • Teacher questionnaires • Teacher satisfaction scale 10/11/2014 20
  21. 21. Bibliography • (Bllack, Anro and Kliebard(1994). Curriculum and evaluation. • Combs, Arthar(1973). Educational accountability: beyond behavioral objectives. • Läänemets, U. and Ruubel, Katrin (2012). The Taba-Tyler Rationales. • Lunenburg, Fred, 2011. Curriculum development: deductive models. • Mesa, Heidi (2010). Curriculum development models: an analysis- project paper. • Khwaja, Iftikhar. Module III: curriculum development, assessment and evaluation. • Rajasekar, S. The systems approach to curriculum development. • Thijs, Annette and Akker, Jan (2009). Curriculum in development. 10/11/2014 21
  22. 22. 10/11/2014 22

×