The documents provide assessment forms and rating sheets for evaluating theory presentations, proposal presentations, and assessment skills. For theory presentations, areas like the title, theory description, image quality, and citations are assessed. Proposal presentations are assessed on the title, design, images, summaries, spelling/grammar, and presentation. Finally, assessors are evaluated on their assessment accuracy by a lecturer, with errors reducing their grade. Overall grades are averaged to calculate assessor performance.
1. Comments on the Theory Presentation
Assessor
Presenter
Proposal Title
ASSESSOR’S COMMENTS
01
Positive
02
Negative
03
Positive
04
Negative
05
Positive
06
Negative
2. Peer Assessment of Theory Presentation
Assessor
Date:
Presenter
Theory Title
Proposal Title
01
Title
The theorist’s last name and year of publication
PASS
FAIL
02
Theory
A specific part of the theory, not the entire theory
PASS
FAIL
03
Image
Source is APA style at the bottom of the slide
PASS
FAIL
04
Image
Image is high quality, not pixilated
PASS
FAIL
05
Summary
A few words in the writer’s own words, with citation
PASS
FAIL
06
Citation
APA Style: (Author, year) before the full-stop symbol.
PASS
FAIL
07
Focus
One part of a complex image is presented separately
PASS
FAIL
08
Application
How the theory is used in the proposal is clearly presented
PASS
FAIL
09
Text
Large text visible to the end of the room.
PASS
FAIL
10
Text
A few words that can be read in 30 seconds are used
PASS
FAIL
11
Speech
Clear, syllabicated, can be heard to the back of the room
PASS
FAIL
12
Action
Eyes mostly on audience; hands and feet not distracting
PASS
FAIL
13
Reference
Each slide with an reference; each in correct APA format
PASS
FAIL
14
Reference
All references listed on last slide; each in correct APA format
PASS
FAIL
TOTAL
# of PASS / 14
3. Comments on the Proposal Presentation
Assessor
Presenter
Proposal Title
ASSESSOR’S COMMENTS
01
Positive
02
Negative
03
Positive
04
Negative
05
Positive
06
Negative
4. Peer Assessment of Proposal Presentation
Assessor
Date:
Presenter
Theory Title
Proposal Title
01
Title
The problem to be solved and the location is stated
PASS
FAIL
02
Title
A specific part of the theory, not the entire theory
PASS
FAIL
03
Design
Complete headings, text and photos look professional
PASS
FAIL
04
Image
Images are clear; sources are recorded
PASS
FAIL
05
Summary
A short story in the writer’s own words related to the topic
PASS
FAIL
06
Theory
Theory is used to explain or solve a problem in the proposal
PASS
FAIL
07
Spelling
No spelling errors that can be seen
PASS
FAIL
08
Grammar
No grammar errors that can be seen
PASS
FAIL
09
Formatting
No formatting errors that can be seen
PASS
FAIL
10
Vocabulary
No vocabulary errors that can be seen
PASS
FAIL
11
Speech
Clear, syllabicated, can be heard to the back of the room
PASS
FAIL
12
Action
Eyes mostly on audience; hands and feet not distracting
PASS
FAIL
13
Presentation
Professional, smooth, clearly well prepared and practiced
PASS
FAIL
14
Enthusiasm
Presenter is enthusiastic and positive in speech and action
PASS
FAIL
TOTAL
# of PASS / 14
5. How the Assessor is Assessed
Assessor's Peer Assessment Grade (by Lecturer)
%
• For instance, a presentation has spelling errors.
• However, an assessor gives a PASS grade for “No
spelling errors that can be seen.”
• That is equal to one assessment error.
• Each assessment error is minus 5 points against the
assessor.
• For instance, an assessor with minus 45 points will get
a grade of (100-45 = 55%).
• Each assessor will complete one assessment for each
team member.
• The total scores will be averaged.
6. G01 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet
Assessor
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Errors
Yusuf Saleh Lubama Demuna
Zhang Jiguang Sadiq
Yahya Bakhit
Lin Ye Htut Aung
Ameroden Datusolaiman Lao
Myo Thura Lwin
Pa Pa Min
Patrya Paing
Khine Khant Soe Lwin
Zhang Zhiguang
Isaac Bate Obenson
TOTAL
AVERAGE
MARK
7. G05 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet
Assessor
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Errors
Said Ismail Abdullahi
Imran Ali
Ahmed Osman Adem Jama
Hassan Anwar
Mohamed Mukthar Ahmad Hamdan Mukthar
Ali Ahmad Hamud Hossen
Musawar Hasan
Ahmedov Lazizhon
Taibu Robson Makumba
Sadeq Saif Mohammed Assalami
Tania Allan
Edgorov Temurmalik
Chimi Yangzom
Akbarhon Toshkujayev
TOTAL
AVERAGE
MARK
8. G10 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet
Assessor
Errors
01
Adam Mohamed Ali Gedi
02
Abdihamid Osman Mohamed
03
Said Abid S/O Said Tahir
04
Yuhan Satapo
05
Suwaibah Yama
06
Kamalrul Syazwan bin Marakan
07
Mohamad Helmi bin Abdul Khadir
08
Muhamadd bin Arsad
09
Muhamad Syazani bin Mohamad Sanee
10
Amirul Anwar bin Rosli
11
Liban Omar Moalim Mohamud
TOTAL
AVERAGE
MARK
9. Project Presentation Assessment
Assessor's Complete Name:
Assessor's Theory Presentation Grade (Average: by Peers)
%
Assessor's Project Presentation Grade (Average: by Peers)
%
Assessment Skills Rating Sheet (Average: by Lecturer)
%
TOTAL
AVERAGE
%