The World Social Science Report 2016 - Challenging Inequalities: Pathways to a Just World highlights the latest social science knowledge on the state of inequalities today, and examines the effects of inequalities across multiple dimensions including gender, environment, access to knowledge, wealth and political power. Looking to the future, the Report asks what scenarios may develop from current levels of inequality, and highlights transformative responses to inequality at all levels, from the grassroots to global governance.
The World Social Science Report 2016 - Challenging Inequalities: Pathways to a Just World was prepared by the International Social Science Council (ISSC) and the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), and co-published with UNESCO.
The Report was published on Thursday, 22 September 2016, and launched at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden. The launch event was hosted by the Swedish Secretariat for Environmental Earth System Sciences (SSEESS). Parts of this presentation were given by Report co-directors Mathieu Denis, Executive Director of the ISSC, and Melissa Leach, Director of the Institute for Development Studies (IDS) on the occasion of the launch.
Find out more and download the full report open access here: http://en.unesco.org/wssr2016
The ISSC produces the World Social Science Report every three years, as part of its strategic partnership with UNESCO. The Reports address important social science challenges, take stock of social science contributions and capacities, and make recommendations for future research, practice and policy.
User Guide: Pulsar™ Weather Station (Columbia Weather Systems)
World Social Science Report 2016 - Challenging Inequalities: Pathways to a Just World
1. World Social Science Report 2016 |
Challenging Inequalities: Pathways
to a Just World
2. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Download the full report:
• 107 authors from 40 countries
• 74 cutting-edge social science
contributions on inequalities
• Research agenda for the next 10
years
• Prepared with the Institute of
Development Studies (IDS) and
co-published with UNESCO
• Summary published in English,
French and Spanish
• Open Access download available
en.unesco.org/wssr2016
3. 2010 | Knowledge Divides
• Co-published with UNESCO
• Articles from 48 authors
• Summary published in English, French, Russian,
Spanish, Chinese and Arabic.
2013 | Changing Global Environments
• Co-published with UNESCO and OECD
• Articles from 151 authors
• Summary published in French, Spanish and
Portuguese
• Over 13 launches worldwide
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
The background | World Social Science Reports address important social
science challenges, take stock of social science contributions and capacities,
and make recommendations for future research, practice and policy.
5. The context | Adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals
commits governments worldwide to take action on inequality
‘We pledge that
no one will be left
behind’
Preamble to the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
6. • To look beyond economic inequality
into the interactions between multiple
dimensions of inequality
• To document the trends in inequality in
all world regions, especially less well-
researched and low-income countries in
Africa and Asia
• To analyse the consequences of
inequalities in different countries and
regions, and for different groups of
people
• To identify strategies to reduce
inequalities
• To provide a multidisciplinary
contribution to the study of inequality,
with inputs from across the social
sciences, as well as from outside
academia
• To identify critical knowledge gaps and
propose a global research agenda on
inequality.
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
The context | Why a new report on inequality?
7. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Timeline | Development of the World Social Science Report 2016
2013 ISSC General Assembly
decides 2016 Report should focus
on inequality
2014 Expert meeting held in
partnership with UNESCO
2015 Scientific Advisory Committee
meets for the first time
2015 Agreement with Institute of
Development Studies (IDS), editorial
team formed
2015 World Social Science Forum
held in Durban, South Africa
2015 Commissioning articles
2016 Editing, peer-review, layout,
publication, translations
Published September 22 2016
8. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Economic and political power are increasingly
concentrated in the hands of a small number of people. This can
threaten growth, social cohesion and the health of democracies.
Wealth of bottom 50 per cent versus wealth of richest sixty-two people (Source: Oxfam, 2016)
9. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Global economic inequality declined during the first
decade of this century, largely due to the reduction of poverty in
countries like China and India. This favourable trend could however be
reversed if inequality within countries continues to increase.
The evolution of global inequality of living standards from 1988 to 2010 (average of various recent
estimates) (Sources: Anand and Segal (2014), Bourguignon (2015), Lakner and Milanovic (2015).)
10. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Inequalities within countries are rising
Evolution of Gini coefficients, high-income and middle income countries (Source: OECD Income Distribution Database, Luxembourg Income Study
(LIS) Database.
11. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Inequalities should not be understood and addressed
only in relation to income and wealth. They interact across seven key
dimensions: economic, political, social, cultural, environmental, spatial
and knowledge.
• In many countries, economic and political resources
are concentrated in the hands of a small elite,
threatening the health of democracies (Byanyima,
67) and widening social and economic inequalities,
especially when these inequalities are combined
with autocratic and non-representative political
systems (Hanieh, 19).
• Life in the Anthropocene is creating new
inequalities on environmental lines. The
development of markets for natural resources has
increased poverty and inequality in certain places
(Fincher, 13). Less equal societies have greater
carbon emissions per dollar of GNP (Power,
Wilkinson and Pickett, 37). Inequality and
environmental unsustainability are deeply
interlinked; tackling one without addressing the
other is unlikely to succeed (Leach, 27; Narain, 29).
• Inequalities in access to knowledge remain
significant, and interact with other dimensions of
inequality. In Nigeria, just 3 per cent of the poorest
girls living in rural areas completed lower secondary
school in 2013, compared with 17 per cent of the
boys. In contrast, 95 per cent of the richest boys in
urban areas completed lower secondary school
(Antoninis, Delprato and Benevot, 10).
• Enduring forms of inequality are associated with
identities, such as race, caste and ethnicity, which
are themselves facets of cultural inequality. Gender
pervades all these; in many settings we see women
and girls facing persistent material disadvantages,
discriminatory social norms, violence, and
restrictions on voice and participation.
12. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Current levels of inequality threaten our
capacity to address other global priorities.
Interaction of Inequality Goal 10 and the other SDGs (Source: Gaventa, 22)
13. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Reducing inequalities is a requirement for human
rights and justice, and is essential for success in other global priority
areas, such as environmental sustainability, conflict resolution and
migrations.
• High and rising inequality can act as an
impediment to economic growth, and dissipates
the impact of growth on poverty reduction
(Kanbur, 24).
• Inequalities can limit our ability to respond to
crises. The effective management of the Ebola
crisis was hindered by visible inequalities between
local and expatriate medical staff, and between
communities and elites, which undermined trust
(Wilkinson and Brima, 31).
• Current affluent lifestyles depend upon an
unsustainable use of fossil fuels and raw materials.
Reducing inequalities requires using resources
differently (Fleurbaey and Klasen, 40).
• Inequalities are producing new manifestations
related to nutrition and health: the ‘stuffed and
starved’ phenomenon of chronic
undernourishment alongside rising obesity
(Hossain, 33).
• There is a growing consensus that systemic
inequality between identity groups may spur
conflict, and evidence that countries with high
levels of group- based inequalities are more likely
to experience civil war (Østby, 25).
14. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
The Report reminds us that the
future of inequality is unwritten. It
details cases of changes in rules,
and of initiatives at various levels,
that are building a fairer world.
15. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Successful pathways to address inequality combine
policies and action in context-specific ways
• Learning from positive country
experiences
• Rule-changing measures and policies
• Social and political action
• Coherent integrated packages,
commitment
• Addressing embedded histories and
cultural practices
• While a century of democratization has made the USA
more politically equal for black people and other
minorities, the disparity in income between black and
white households has been remarkably stable over forty
years. Racial disparity remains significant in other
domains, such as access to education, health and justice
(Harris, 20).
• In Africa as elsewhere, control of and access to natural
resources has for centuries underpinned social
stratification and the production of inequalities
(Murombedzi, 9; Olukoshi, 48).
• The increase of economic inequality in the period from
1998 to 2008 resulted primarily from the growth in
incomes of the top 1 per cent, particularly in rich
countries (Milanovic, 5). At the same time, globalization,
deindustrialization and the polarization of the labour
market in Western economies mean that the middle
classes are experiencing a slow but consistent erosion of
their standard of living (Chauvel and Hartung, 38).
16. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| Collective action by citizens is opening spaces for
additional solutions to inequality that can inspire inclusive policy
innovation
• New alliances of stakeholders can build
broad support for change. The mobilization
of doctors, patient groups and political
forces around the design of a Patient’s Bill of
Rights was a significant contributor to a new
Health Insurance Law on universal coverage
in Egypt (Bayoumi, 30).
• Grass-roots mobilization and political action
can often be effective in breaking down
deeply connected economic, social and
political inequalities (Gaventa and Runciman,
12).
• In India, Indonesia, Ethiopia and Brazil, local
initiatives empower poor and vulnerable
adults, especially women, to diversify their
income sources and access microcredit. They
are instrumental in the development of
solidarity and self-help networks among the
individuals concerned (Mathie et al., 64).
• Public participation can increase the
political will to reduce inequality. A high
level of public participation in Brazil’s ‘Zero
Hunger’ effort was crucial to the country’s
turnaround to reduced inequality (Green,
66).
17. Number of social science publications produced worldwide on inequality and social justice
per subfield, 1992–2013 (fractional counting)
Key messages| There are important inequalities in the knowledge
produced about inequalities – by sub-field
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
18. Number of social science and humanities publications on inequalities and social justice per
region 1992- 2013
…and by Region
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
19. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Key messages| A new social science research agenda is needed to
accompany and inform pathways toward greater equality.
Priority 1: Increase support for knowledge
production about inequality, and processes of
social inclusion and exclusion, in those places
most affected by them.
Priority 2: Improve our ability to assess,
measure and compare the dimensions of
inequality over time and across the world.
Priority 3: Deepen our understanding of diverse
experiences of inequality.
Priority 4: Deepen our understanding of how
multiple inequalities are created, maintained
and reproduced.
Priority 5: Deepen our understanding of how
local and global forms of inequality connect and
interact.
Priority 6: Promote research on how to move
towards greater equality.
Priority 7: Support cross-cutting syntheses and
theory on inequality and equality.
20. • Goes beyond ‘ measuring’ inequality – to understanding
intersecting and multiple forms of inequality through
multidisiciplinary approaches
• Goes beyond quantification – to innovative combinations of,
qualitative, participatory studies, and quantitative methods that
focus more on why inequalities persist and how they can be
overcome
• Goes beyond just producing more social science – to challenging
inequalities of knowledge, of access, of construction and co-
construction, and of whose knowledge counts.
A step change is needed – towards a more multidisciplinary, globally
inclusive and transformative agenda
www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
21. www.worldsocialscience.org | #ChallengingInequalities
Download the full Report
en.unesco.org/wssr2016
The Report was financed by generous
contributions from the Swedish
International Development Cooperation
Agency (Sida); UNESCO, as part of its
framework agreement with the ISSC; the
Swiss Agency for Development and
Cooperation (SDC); European Science
Foundation (ESF), Netherlands
Organisation for Scientific Research
(NWO), Research Council of Norway,
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond and the
Swedish Research Council.
Goal on inequality plus interactions with other goals.
Inequalities are challenging first, because they are rising
Bringing together the latest evidence on inequality trends
Dramatic rise in the incomes of the top 1 per cent of earners globally, concentrating wealth in the hands of a small elite - sixty-two individuals own the same wealth as the bottom half of the world population (Oxfam, 2016)
the report shows that global inequality – that is, between the living standards of the entire global population – actually declined during the first decade of this century. But this is driven largely by reduced inequality between countries, and large reductions in poverty in China and India. Rising inequalities within countries threaten to reverse this positive trend.
We are seeing rising inequalities in both old industrialised countries, and emerging middle income ones. In emerging economies data is scarcer and time series are shorter, but countries
such as Colombia, Brazil and India register even higher levels of income inequality than in the North. Today South Africa has the world’s highest income inequality,
despite a decrease in recent years.
In China, not shown here, the Gini coefficient rose by eleven points over the period 1985– 2008 (Li, 15), although a decline of about two points in the subsequent six years could mark a turning
point.
Also rising in SSA, although data are even poorer
The inequalities that matter are not just of income and wealth, however. While concern often focuses on the economic, to understand and respond to inequality we need to address six further forms: political, social, cultural, environmental, spatial and inequalities related to knowledge. The report therefore often talks of multiple inequalities.
The report’s contributors show the numerous ways these multiple inequalities interact. They do so in shaping drivers – in in Egypt for instance, not just economic but political and gender inequalities interacted.
Whether amongst young people in Europe or farmers in Malawi; citizens and refugees in the Middle East or urban residents in South Africa or India, we see how people often experience intersecting discriminations and injustices, as these different forms of inequality interact and compound each other.
Some of the most enduring forms of inequality are those associated with identities, such as race, caste and ethnicity, which are themselves facets of what we term cultural inequality. Gender pervades all these, and in many settings we see women and girls facing persistent – and sometimes growing – material disadvantages, discriminatory social norms, violence, and restrictions on voice and participation.
Downward spirals of intersecting inequalities can in turn affect people’s self-perceptions, limiting their capacities to aspire to a different way of life.
Rising inequalities therefore matter in many ways. Most fundamentally, they are ethically and morally objectionable, having no place in societies striving for greater fairness and justice. But it also has far-reaching consequences for almost every aspect of our lives, and abilities to achieve other political and social goals, including those in the SDGs. The report argues that tackling inequality – goal 10 – should be regarded as a central goal, necessary for countries to achieve almost all the others.
To elaborate on these consequences –
Poverty and growth - Kanbur shows that that inequality can hamper economic growth, and certainly reduces the impact of that growth on poverty reduction.
Ability to respond to crises – the importance of trust, which inequalities can undermine
Health, nutrition, worse in countries with higher income inequality. For instance, as Hossain points out (33), the area of hunger is witnessing new manifestations
of inequality related to nutrition – the ‘“stuffed and starved” phenomenon of chronic undernourishment alongside rising obesity’.
Conflict and access to justice - for instance, Østby (25) examines the relationship between inequality and political violence, noting the importance of horizontal inequalities for conflict as well as the role of ‘sheer inequality between rich and poor nations’.
And deeply linked with environmental unsustainability, and the many goals around water, land, climate; can worsen environmental problems like climate change, and make the co-operation needed to tackle them far more difficult.