Because we are asking the wrong questions precisely, we are getting the wrong answers precisely; and as a result we are creating false positives.
There seem to be a lot of sightings of “Black Swans” lately. Should we be concerned? Are we wishfully thinking, caught up in media hype? Or are we misinterpreting what a “Black Swan” event really is? The term “Black Swan” has become a popular buzzword for many, including contingency planners, risk managers and consultants. But there is a general lack of knowledge when it comes to rare events with serious consequences. Is your organization plagued by shapeshifters? It is naïve to try to predict the effects of a risk materializing entirely on the basis of relationships observed in historical data, especially highly aggregated historical data, business impact assessments and competitive intelligence research.
Unpredictability is becoming the new norm for business.
Fundamental uncertainties derive from our fragmentary understanding of risk and complex system dynamics and interdependencies. Abundant stochastic variation in risk parameters further exacerbates the ability to assess uncertainties clearly. Uncertainty is not just a single dimension, but also surrounds the potential impacts of forces such as globalization and decentralization, effects of movements of global markets and trade regimes, and the effectiveness and utility of risk identification and control measures such as buffering, use of incentives, or strict regulatory approaches. Crafting difficult decisions when faced with uncertainty requires a blending of skills from strategic planning, risk management, competitive intelligence and business continuity. Unless we change the paradigm of competitive intelligence, risk and business continuity activities, we will continue to get false positives and find ourselves reacting to events instead of being proactive.
Learning Objectives:
- 12 questions to refocus strategy, competitive intelligence, risk and business continuity alignment;
- Overcoming impacts of changing technology and alternative information distribution systems;
- 12 “Shapeshifters” that will influence competitive intelligence, risk and business continuity activities.
Provocateur Biosketch: Geary Sikich – Entrepreneur, consultant, author and business lecturer
Geary Sikich is a seasoned risk management professional who advises private and public sector executives to develop risk buffering strategies to protect their asset base. With a M.Ed. in Counseling and Guidance, Geary’s focus is human capital: what people think, who they are, what they need and how they communicate. With over 25 years in management consulting as a trusted advisor, crisis manager, senior executive and educator, Geary brings unprecedented value to clients worldwide. He is well-versed in contingency planning, risk management, human resource development, “war gaming,” as well as competitive intelligence, issues analysis, an
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
How Blending Business Continuity, Strategy and Risk Management Mitigates Black Swans and Shapeshifters
1. How Blending Business
Continuity, Strategy and Risk
Management Mitigates “Black
Swans” and “Shapeshifters”
A Complimentary Webinar from Aurora WDC
12:00 Noon Eastern /// Wednesday 03 April 2013
~ featuring ~
Geary Sikich Dr. Craig Fleisher
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
2. Questions, Commentary & Content
α Use the Questions pane on your
GoToWebinar control panel and all
questions will be answered in the
second half of the hour.
α You are welcome to tweet any
comments on Twitter where we are
monitoring the hashtag #IntelCollab or
eavesdrop via
http://tweetchat.com/room/IntelCollab
α Slides will be available after the
webinar for embedding and sharing via
http://slideshare.net/IntelCollab
α To view the recording and download
the PPT file, please register for a trial
membership at http://IntelCollab.com.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
3. Geary Sikich advises executives about complex decision
making, risk, continuity and competing in the global
economy.
Connect with Geary via: LinkedIn
Web: http://www.logicalmanagement.com
Email: gsikich@logicalmanagement.com
g.sikich@att.net
Geary Sikich
Skype: geary.sikich
Author, Expert, Advisor
The Intelligence Collaborative is the online learning and networking
community powered by Aurora WDC, our clients, partners and other friends
and dedicated to exploring how to apply intelligence methods to solve real-
world business problems.
Apply for a free 30-day trial membership at http://IntelCollab.com or learn
more about Aurora at http://AuroraWDC.com – see you next time!
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
4. AGENDA
Defining the problem
“Black Swans”
“Shapeshifters”
Suggested actions/possible solutions
Q&A
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
5. A black swan is a highly
improbable event with three
principal characteristics: it is
unpredictable; it carries a
massive impact; and, after the
fact, we concoct an explanation
that makes it appear less
random, and more predictable,
than it was.
Taleb continues by recognizing what he terms the
problem –
“Lack of knowledge when it comes to
rare events with serious
Nassim Taleb “The Black Swan: The Impact of the
consequences.” Highly Improbable.”
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
6. Skewed Paradigms:
Extremely Rare Events –
Strategy, Risk
Management, Business Continuity
Planning, Competitive Intelligence
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
7. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Effect of a single
observation, event or element
plays a disproportionate role in
decision-making creating
estimation errors when
projecting the severity of the
consequences of the event. The
depth of consequence and the
breadth of consequence are
underestimated resulting in
surprise at the impact of the
event.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
8. The stretcher who hammers out the metal
Are you making things fit;
regardless of the
consequences?
You may be falling into an
“Activity Trap”
In Greek mythology Procrustes or "the stretcher [who hammers out the metal]", also known as Prokoptas or Damastes
"subduer", was a rogue smith and bandit from Attica who physically attacked people by stretching them or cutting off
their legs, so as to force them to fit the size of an iron bed. In general, when something is Procrustean, different lengths
or sizes or properties are fitted to an arbitrary standard.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
9. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
The problem –
“Black Swan” event is a subjective term – Your “Black Swan” may
be my “White” or “Gray” Swan
“Black Swan” events are labeled after the fact
“Black Swan” events are selective in their consequences for those
who experience them
“Black Swan” events take the “fat tails” of power law systems
seriously. Expect change to arrive not gradually, in a way that will
allow the organization to adjust in real time, but in sudden
discontinuities of great consequence that reshape the business
environment, bringing both dangers and opportunities.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
10. Prediction – Projection
If you don’t know what you
don’t know, how can you
prepare for it?
Conventional practices leave us
vulnerable to
random, potentially
catastrophic events, that
cannot be predicted based on
simple extrapolations from the
past or projections of the
future. Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
11. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Strategic plans, Risk
Management plans, Business It is much easier to
Continuity plans, Competitive sell: “Look what I
Intelligence did for you”
initiatives, etc., that are
standalone activities than
generally reflect good
intentions – whether to meet “Look what I
regulatory requirements or to avoided for you.”
address governance.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
13. Shapeshifting is the nonlinear evolution of
events combined with reactions to events.
Shapeshifting can be influenced and
somewhat controlled by individuals (an act
of will, a decision, or situational awareness).
Shapeshifting may be the result of natural
forces, limited information, failure to work
through the process of solution and/or
extreme influence by external forces.
Shapeshifting is evolutionary (uniqueness is
created in the way that evolution occurs.
Shapeshifting is not linear (evolution creates
change, collateral factors come into
play, consequences have long lasting effects.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
14. Volatility and Disorder – Nonlinear Effects
Execution Risk Positive Consequences
Right Action
Action
Recognized Risk Altered Risk State
No Action
Wrong Action
Execution Risk Negative Consequences
Transparent Vulnerabilities? Outliers? Variables?
Distorted Maps of Real Risks? Linear vs. Non-Linear Thinking
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
15. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
A stone and its weight in pebbles – size matters.
A collection of small units with semi-independent variations
produces vastly different risk characteristics than a single large unit
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
16. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Non-predictability of events is not relevant with regard to
the consequences of events. Effective decision making
does not mean “perfect” – all decisions are flawed.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
17. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Since 1956 there have been
over 200 incidents – from sunk
rigs to blowouts, collapse and
hurricanes, storms, etc.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
18. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Volcanic States?
Idaho 10 volcanoes
New Hampshire 2 volcanoes
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
19. Randomness, Risk and Black Swans
Emerging Risks – Likelihood, Impact & Velocity
High Competition
Global Workforce
Geo-Political Sovereign Debt
Infrastructure
Environmental
Markets RISK VELOCITY
Economies
Likelihood
Very Rapid
Foreign Sources Impact of the risk would
be evident in a month
Alternatives
Rapid
Technology Impact of the risk would
be evident in a quarter
Social Trends Slow
Impact of the risk would
be evident in a year
Low
Low High
Impact
•Traditional risk assessments that prioritize risk on probability and impact are outpaced by the speed
at which risks move throughout the organization. While 70% of finance executives agree that risk
velocity is a core consideration, only 11% have introduced it into their risk assessments.
Source: Deloitte; Risk Integration Strategy Council Research
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
20. Suggested Actions/Possible Solutions
As a result of the globalized environment in which we operate
today risks that were virtually unknown in the past decade
continue to surface resulting in an increased need for
organizations to constantly assess the global landscape to
determine potential impacts (positive and negative) of risk
realization.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
21. False Positives
Mistaking the absence of evidence
(of harm) for the absence of harm.
Overestimation of the chances of
success and underestimation of the
chances of failure.
Artificially suppressed volatility
causes fragility – extreme fragility –
while exhibiting no visible risks.
“Why did we build something so
fragile (susceptible) to these types
of events?”
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
22. Suggested Actions
Step 1: Where Are We? Develop an External Environment Profile
What are the key factors in our external environment and how much can we control them?
Step 2: Where Are We? Develop an Internal Environment Profile
Build detailed snapshots of your business activities as they are at present.
Step 3: Where Are We Going? Develop Assumptions about the Future External Environment
Catalog future influences systematically; know your key challenges and threats.
Step 4: Where Can We Go? Develop a Capabilities Profile
What are our strengths and needs? How are we doing in our key results and activities
areas?
Step 5: Where Might We Go? Develop Future Internal Environment Assumptions
Build assumptions, potentials, etc. Do not build predictions or forecasts! Assess what the
future business situation might look like.
Step 6: Where Do We Want to Go? Develop Objectives
Create a pyramid of objectives; redefine your business; set functional objectives.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
23. Suggested Actions
Step 7: What Do We Have to Do? Develop a Gap Analysis Profile
What will be the effect of new external forces? What assumptions can we make about
future changes to our environment?
Step 8: What Could We Do? Opportunities and Problems
Act to fill the gaps. Conduct an opportunity-problem feasibility analysis; risk analysis
assessment; resource-requirements assessment. Build action program proposals.
Step 9: What Should We Do? Select Strategy and Program Objectives
Classify strategy and program objectives; make explicit commitments; adjust
objectives.
Step 10: How Can We Do It? Implementation
Evaluate the impact of new programs.
Step 11: How Are We Doing? Control
Monitor external environment. Analyze fiscal and physical variances. Conduct an
overall assessment.
Step 12: Change What’s not Working Revise, Control, Remain Flexible
Revise strategy and program objectives as needed; revise explicit commitments as
needed; adjust objectives as needed.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
24. Suggested Actions
Heightened Awareness or Reactive and Backward Looking
Preemptive Proactive Reactive
Anticipates Change Recognizes Change Process is means to an
end “Mission Critical”
Recognizes complexity Causal focus overlooks
& interconnectivity opacity, complexity & Fails to ask: “Is the
interconnectivity process still relevant?”
Research focuses on
long term Research – tactical Research –
trends, drivers, issues trends, drivers, issues prescriptive, little
creative problem
Expanded knowledge Knowledge: “Cylinders solving
base of Excellence”
Knowledge: potentially
Not process dependent Process focused inaccurate “False
Alignment – Alignment – “Cylinders Positives”
SP, BC, RM, CI of Excellence” Alignment – “Defined
Boundaries”
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
26. We know very little about how different highly
disruptive, nonlinear changes might interact with
and amplify one another.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
27. Questions, Commentary & Content
α Use the Questions pane on your
GoToWebinar control panel and all
questions will be answered in the
second half of the hour.
α You are welcome to tweet any
comments on Twitter where we are
monitoring the hashtag #IntelCollab or
eavesdrop via
http://tweetchat.com/room/IntelCollab
α Slides will be available after the
webinar for embedding and sharing via
http://slideshare.net/IntelCollab
α To view the recording and download
the PPT file, please register for a trial
membership at http://IntelCollab.com.
Powered by
The Intelligence Collaborative
http://IntelCollab.com #IntelCollab
Editor's Notes
Connectivity is a key driving force.Complexity is becoming the norm as business become more connected. All touchpoints must be operating in a cohesive fashion in order to create a continuity continuum.Each touchpoint must be responsive to the actions of the entire network of enterprises operating.We often times fail to account for resource constraints – human capital, financial resources, etc. all impact the resilience of the enterprise.
Debt becomes poisonous once it reaches 80% to 100% of GDP for governments, 90% of GDP for companies, and 85% of GDP for households. From then on, extra debt chokes growth. Stephen Cecchetti and his team at the Bank for International Settlements have written the definitive paper rebutting the pied pipers of ever-escalating credit."The debt problems facing advanced economies are even worse than we thought."
Here are some limitations to consider: Incompleteness of the model (unpredictability factors in) Incorrectly specified parameters/scope (Measurement tools are inadequate) Overly complex (It’s not easy to detect paradigm shifts, it’s best to claim to detect as many as possible and quietly bury your failures) Scenarios may no longer be appropriate (Unpredictability, evolving nature of the event over time means that the event seldom ends in the form that it started) Obsolescence of the model (Unpredictability and evolution make the model obsolete) High cost to develop, operate and maintain (Skill set requires vast amounts of experience; limited by time and the nature of rare events) Require a high degree of interpretational skill (knowledge, experience, background – human capital)