1. Active Spatial Sunlight DilutionTM
Increases Areal Productivity of Microalgae
- A Presentation at ISAP Conference 2014, Sydney
Weixing Tan, PhD
Grande Prairie Regional College,
Canada
2. Key Limitation for Microalgae Industrial
Application
โข Low areal productivity (Benemann 2003)
โข Directly impacts economic bottom line
โข Under 20 g/m2/day for open ponds
โข Recently reported from Algenol in (Photobioreactor) PBR:
10,000 gal (ethanol)/acre/yr (equivalent to 32.5 g/m2/day)
(Spall et al. 2011)
โข Up to 50-70 g/m2/day as reported in PBRs (Spall et al.
2011; Sudhakar & Premalatha 2012)
2
3. Key Limitation for Microalgae Industrial
Application
โข Inefficient sunlight utilization by microalgae
โข Major contribution to low productivity
โข 50-90% of the energy losses (Zemke et al. 2008; Sudhakar &
Premalatha 2012)
โข Maximum efficiency โ 12% of the total solar input after
reductions of PAR portion (47%), transmission (95%) &
photoconversion (27%)
โข Equivalent to approximately 150-200 g/m2/day
โข Reported productivities were only 10-30% of this
maximum. 3
4. Analysis of Sunlight Utilization by Microalgae
# Item
Relative
Reduction
Reduction in %
Solar Energy
% of Solar Energy
after Reduction Comments
(1) Maximum 12.0%
(2)
Efficiency of Photon
Utilization due to
Saturation - Bush Equation
35% of the (1)
(50% sunny
days)
-4.2% 7.8%
Saturation PAR =
200 ยตmol/m
2
/s
(3)
Sub-optimal
Environments, Including
Photoinhibition
70-0% of the (2) -5.5-0% 2.3-7.8%
(4)
Respiration &
Maintenance
40% of the (3) -0.9-3.3% 1.4-4.5%
Equivalent to
~10-50 g/m
2
/day
4
5. What are holding us up from the maximum?
โข The culprits - photosaturation and suboptimal environments
(difficult to reduce respiration/maintenance)
โข Inefficient sunlight utilization is the key limiting factor,
representing 60-100% of the recoverable opportunities โ a
conclusion recognized for over 50 years (e.g. Vonshak & Torzillo 2003).
1. Photosaturation: 4.2 % of the solar input or equivalent 50 g/m2/day
2. Photoinhibition (at 30% of the suboptimal environments) : 0-1.7% or 0-20
g/m2/day
5
6. Vonshak & Torzillo (2003)
Energy Loss during Photosynthesis
6
Photosaturation Quenching Photoinhibition
7. What we can do
Three solutions suggested by Vonshak & Torzillo (2003)
1. โ algae density & mixing rate โ logistics, energy intensive,
sheering stress, scalability
2. Improve light distribution in the culture โ cumbersome,
expensive, scalability
3. Algal strains with small antenna โ to be proved yet, trade-off?
We suggest the 4th:
4. Active Spatial Sunlight DilutionTM โ simple, inexpensive,
scalable & works (patented PCT/CA2014/050450)
7
8. What is Active Spatial Sunlight DilutionTM?
โข Orienting 2 opposing surfaces ACTIVELY in parallel to the sunray:
1. Reduces or โDILUTESโ sunlight exposure
2. Allows uniform sunlight on both surfaces, diminishing shading
in Parallelin Perpendicular
vs
When
facing the
sunโฆ
13. Sunlight Dilution on E-W PBR Surfaces
with Uniform Exposure
East West
When we align the
panel in parallel to
the sunโฆ
13
14. Description of the PBR System
โข One panel with 24x2=48 round glass tubes (244x2.7 cm), 61 L
โข Glasses staggered at 1 cm spacing on both surfaces, facing E-W
โข 2 curtains (12 cm spacing) on each side to simulate the scale-up
โข Moving at 1โฐ increment in ~10:30-17:30 each day by computer
โข PAR sensors on E-W sides and in perpendicular to Sun
โข One air bubbler in each tube (~500-1000 ยตm)
โข Culture circulation by air-lifting
14
15. Microalgae Culture
โข Chlorella vulgaris (UTEX 2714) grown auto-trophically
โข 2 cycles of 3 mostly sunny days in September 2012
โข Culture conditions:
โข 3% CO2 flue gas (mixed with air) from natural gas generator
โข Temperature inside solarium: 22-25/22โฐC (day/night)
โข Balanced chemical nutrient solution with initial 413 ppm N
at pH 6.5
โข Starting algae density of ~1.26 g/L and then measured each
day
15
16. Preliminary Results โ Sunlight Dilution (1st example)
(Some troughs were
from structural beams)
16
17. Preliminary Results โ Sunlight Dilution (2nd example)
(Some troughs were
from structural beams)
17
18. Preliminary Results โ Microalgae Productivity
โข Average volumetric productivity =
0.634+0.207 g/L/day
โข Equivalent to 106 g/m2/day when
calculated on a scaled industrial
configuration
(Chlorella vulgaris)
18
19. Current and Future Research and Development
โข Construction of 5-panel system with a
simpler, inexpensive & automated design
(300 L) for further testing of scalability
โข Nutrient and water recycling
โข Microbe control
โข Development and construction of a pilot
scale system beside a emission source
19
20. Conclusion
โข Overcoming photosaturation and photoinhibition is the
most promising strategy to significantly increase
microalgae productivity.
โข The โActive Spatial Sunlight DilutionTMโ concept is a simple
and scalable solution.
โข It increases areal productivity by:
1. Distributing a diluted and desirable fraction of sunlight to more
compacted PBR surface areas
2. Diminishing mutual shading on opposite PBR surfaces
3. Significantly reducing photosaturation and photoinhibition
20
21. Acknowledgements
โข Major Sponsors/Partners
โข Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
(NSERC), Canada
โข ConocoPhillips Canada Ltd., Canada
โข EnEco Systems Inc, Canada, Europe, South America
โข Woodmere Nursery Ltd., Canada
โข Rheaume Engineering Inc., Canada
21
22. Acknowledgements
โข Research Team
โข Weixing Tan, PhD, Principal Investigator (plant
ecophysiology)
โข Abigail Adebusuyi, PhD (microbiology and biotechnology)
โข Melissa Day, PhD (microbiology, 2011-13)
โข Ali Al-Asadi, PhD (astronomy and physics)
โข Bruce Rutley, PhD PAg (agricultural production systems)
โข Laurie Lin (mechanical engineering)
โข Jordan Pickup (computing)
โข Aurele Lemay (electrical)
22