1) The document discusses the interconnectivity between various sustainable development goals (SDGs) such as economic growth, healthy societies, and environmental protection.
2) It provides several examples of how water management strategies, such as solar irrigation, can help achieve multiple SDGs by improving food security, livelihoods, climate adaptation and mitigation.
3) The document emphasizes that sustainable development requires understanding the complex relationships and trade-offs between different sectors such as water, energy, food, and ecosystems.
6. Solar irrigation – multiple benefits, but depends
on the business model
Risk of over-pumping
Business model in which “surplus”
solar power sold to electricity grid.
• Farmers have an incentive for
water productivity
• Reduced groundwater abstraction
• Climate adaptation benefit –
diversified income
• Climate mitigation benefit –
emission reduction
SPICE (Solar Power Irrigators’ Cooperative Enterprise) Model
Photo: IWMI
8. Stress coffee – save water
Key outcome
“Nestlé will implement the recommended best practices
within its Farmer Connect network of 12’000 farmers and
will work with other key local stakeholders for wider
dissemination and scale up.”
http://www.nestle.com/csv/case-studies/AllCaseStudies/coffee-water-
vietnam
Analysis from farm records:
• water stress at key growth stage helps reach 3-4
tons/ha
• optimal irrigation scheduling is required to break
the 4 tons/ha barrier.
• can reduce groundwater withdrawals without
effect on coffee yield
9. Photo:DavidBrazier/IWMIPhoto:TomvanCakenberghe/IWMIPhoto:DavidBrazier/IWMIPhoto:DavidBrazier/IWMI
Implications for food security,
livelihoods, and
resource governance
GROUNDWATER
IN LAO PDR:
1
Improved understanding of hydrogeological
systems at the local, intermediate (district &
provincial) and national scales
Clarity on the way groundwater is perceived, used
and managed under different contexts
Clearer definition of the actual costs and
benefits of groundwater irrigation
New tools to assess how to sustainably develop the
resource and avoid negative environmental impacts
Strengthened human and institutional capacity of stakeholders
2
3
4
5
Project Achievements
in 5 key areas http://gw-laos.iwmi.org/
10. SOUTH ASIA DROUGHT MONITOR SYSTEM (SA-DMS)
2015 field observations in Jalna,
Maharashtra
Disaster risk reduction – need for ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ solutions
11. Sustainable Solutions for People and Societies
Managing variability and risk: index-based crop insurance
2016 PMFBY Crop
Insurance Scheme in
Bihar:
> 285,000 farmers
benefit by stabilizing
farm income
c. 2.5m ha insured
covering crop loss or
damage due to
natural calamities
12. Photo:DavidBrazier/IWMIPhoto:TomvanCakenberghe/IWMIPhoto:DavidBrazier/IWMIPhoto:DavidBrazier/IWMI
GOALS:
1. Develop a strong proof of concept:
technical, economic & institutional
2. Facilitate opportunities for scaling up in
the most prospective regions
Currently
Wet Season
UTFI
Wet Season
UTFI
Dry Season
Urban: protecting livelihoods & assets
Rural: better access to groundwater &
increased agricultural production and
livelihoods improvement
BENEFITS:
http:http://utfi.iwmi.org/
Storing water underground - an alternative approach to
mitigating flood impacts and improving livelihoods
UTFI: Underground Taming of Floods for Irrigation
13. Natural basin
Crops
Hydropower
Industrial Regulation of
water balance
Erosion control
Climate
regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient
cycling
Recreation
Crops
Hydropower
Industrial
Regulation of
water balance
Erosion control
Climate
regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient
cycling
Recreation
Intensively utilized basin
Crops
Hydropower
Industrial Regulation of
water balance
Erosion control
Climate
regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient
cycling
Recreation
Multifunctional “green” basin
Provisioning services
Regulatory services
Cultural services
Supporting services
Dams: achieving a balance between built
infrastructure and natural capital
14. ECOSYSTEMS
WATER
ENERGY FOOD
ENERGYFORWATER
FOOD&LANDFORWATER
ECOSYSTEMS
• Extensive hydropower
development in the basin
• Agriculture is the primary livelihood of most
people living in the basin
• Limited irrigation means that agriculture is
sensitive to climate• Hydropower is a major driver
of change
• No large-scale wastewater
treatment
• Increase access to
improved drinking water
• Limited access to electricity
in Cambodia and Lao PDR
• Predominately subsistence agriculture
• Agricultural intensification
impacting runoff, sediment and
water quality
• Increasing frequency of
droughts and floods driven by
climate change
• Mining activities will increase regional
energy demand and require transportation
infrastructure• Dams likely to lead to declines
in fisheries productivity
• Mining activities will lead to
downstream erosion and loss of
fertile soils
Partners: IUCN and ICEM
Guided by: Technical Advisory Group with national and regional
representation from all 3 countries.
Nexus trade-offs in the 3S Basin
15. Sustainability wins – reduce soil erosion and generate income:
Multi-scale assessment of cropping practices on streamflow and soil erosion in Laos
Context: new market opportunities drive rapid land-use changes and
unsustainable soil losses on hillslopes
Results: Identified crop species and management practices with high potential
for water and soil conservation
Uptake: through farmer field
schools and cross-village visits
Outcome: Farmers introduced
understorey species in
commercial tree plantations to
preserve soils and generate
economic benefits
16. Feminization of agriculture - male migration (urban and
overseas) and an ageing population
Women often lack access to finance, inputs, extension services
and information
Power dynamics constrains optimal solutions
Need to rethink program delivery to reflect gender differentiated
roles, perspectives, social and cultural practices, etc.
Gender targeted investments needed to achieve the SDGs
17. Livestock
Men
Upland Rice control limited
(material, relational and
subjective costs)
Fishing control increased
(material benefit)
Livestock control
decreased (material cost)
Women
Riverbank gardens control
decrease (material cost)
Weaving control increased
(material, subjective
benefits)
Education increased
participation (relational and
subjective benefits)
Costs and benefits
need to be assessed in
material, relational
and subjective terms.
Provides insights into
why some household
members accept and
others reject livelihood
options offered by
hydropower
development.
When evaluating the impact of proposed livelihood options, it is
necessary to disaggregate the costs and benefits to women and
men, as well as ethnic groups, separately.
Success of livelihood options depends on gender
targeted design
18. Mapping Diverse Perspectives
Photo: Liza Debevec / IWMI
Incorporating gendered perspectives on landscapes into
physically–based models via participatory 3-D mapping
Those on the left are generally benefits. Those on the right can be negatively impacted.
For example over-pumping of groundwater for solar irrigation; loss of wetlands and aquatic biodiversity for dams and risks of poorly structured compensation mechanisms
1. “Surplus” solar power generated in solar pumps can be sold to a government/third party buyer similar to any cash crop, though this crop is free from weather risk and pest attacks.
2. Enabling surplus power sale impacts the economic behavior of the farmer by attaching an “opportunity cost” to pumping groundwater.
3. IWMI executed a research pilot at Dhundi village to test the idea
4.Six farmers formed a cooperative to sell surplus power to the local power utility at Rs 4.63 ( 7 cents) per unit, a tariff “dictated” by the utility. This was the lowest solar tariff in the country at that time. IWMI was arguing for a tariff of Rs 6 and therefore topped the tariff given by the utility with Rs 1.25 as Water Conservation Bonus and Rs 1.25 as Green Energy Bonus. As per IWMI, a tariff of around Rs 6 represents the cumulative saving to the society and not just the energy value of the power sale.
SPICE offers some solution to otherwise very complex and intricate issues
1.
Deadwight of electricity subsidies; US $ 30 billion/year?
Replacing every GWh electricity used by solar energy reduces subsidy burden by US $ 85000/year. If all elec. tubewells in South Asia were replaced by solar pumps, US $15 billion/year would be saved
Currently six farmers have given up their entitlement of subsidized farm power connection for 25 years. This saved initial investment by MGVCL of US $ 10,000 and future subsidy of US $ 58,500, which local utility would have had incurred if they were to supply electricity to them.
2.
Poor quality and nightly power supply to agriculture
Solar energy is more reliable than grid power, it satisfies strongly felt need and demand for grid independence
Not just farmers but the neighbours of the solar farmers are very satisfied since they get reliable day time irrigation.
3.
Perverse incentives driving groundwater depletion in western India
Guaranteed buy-back of surplus solar power at an attractive price of US $ 0.09/kWh creates powerful incentive to sell solar power to the grid rather than using it for pumping.
Research Highlights from: “Enhancing the Resilience and Productivity of Rainfed Dominated Systems in Lao PDR through Sustainable Groundwater Use” (2012 to 2016)
* This is one of the largest research activities carried out about GW in Laos and which recently came to an end.
* Even in a SW-rich country such as Laos, we still need GW – the Beer Lao and Tiger Head bottled water we take for granted daily would not be the same without it
* There is a clear trend for increasing importance being given to GW for a number of strategic reasons, and this is being reflected by much higher levels of development of GW infrastructure across rural and urban areas.
* What we don’t know are the limits to development and how can GW best serve to boost food security and tap opportunities for farmers to enter stronger markets through crop diversification?
* This project worked with national partners from government and the university, along with regional partners from Thai and Japan. The team covered a wide range of disciplines – geology, hydrology, engineering, environmental science, economics, social science – and worked at the national scale but with a stronger focus on the ground in Vientiane and Champasak Provinces.
* There were 4 major components: 1) Resource assessments and modelling, 2) Opportunities and constraints in GW use, 3) Agricultural GW use technologies, 4) Capacity Building and Training
* And as this slides tries to point out, there have been some achievements from the project in a number of areas. Perhaps most significantly, there has been demonstrated boost in human and institutional capacity and the findings from the project have been used to improve water resources policies including the National Groundwater Action Plan prepared by MONRE.
IWMI To launch index based flood insurance to help insurance companies assess the extent of crop damage due to floods and clear the claims to farmers faster
http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/iwmi-to-soon-launch-index-based-flood-insurance-product-116120901094_1.html
Results from 2016 Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana Crops Insurance Scheme in Bihar to support insurer:
More than 285,000 farmers benefitted from the crop insurance scheme by stabilizing farm income
Approx. 2.5 million hectares of farm land being insured which covers crop loss or damage caused due to natural calamities
* Floods and droughts are of growing concern at the global scale
* What we’ve been doing in recent years in to explore different types of approaches for bridging between the times and places faced with too much and those with too little water
This one here, which we’ve coined ‘UTFI’ is applicable at the basin scale and essentially works like a large savings account depositing excess water in aquifers and drawing upon it when or where needed. This addresses floods and droughts with one intervention.
* Conditions conducive for UTFI seem to be present across all major continents in areas home to around half the world’s population.
* Since 2015 we’ve been trialling UTFI in the Ganges Basin in India - as the photo shows – to develop a strong proof of concept, business case and implementation manuals. The results look promising and already there have been interest from state and central government to implement this in other areas.
* This idea began with some work IWMI was involved with a few years back in the Chao Phraya so its relevant to bring this approach to your attention.
Aim of the study:
The purpose of this project is to improve the quality of planning and investment in the 3S region
By adopting a Nexus approach to evaluating past studies and information, the study team and TAG members will generate an in-depth understanding of the state of the basin and the inter-linkages (conflicts and synergies) between water-related sectors (agriculture, fisheries, hydropower and mining) including drivers of change and the social implications. This understanding will enable the study team/TAG to appreciate the context in which investment and water resource planning and management decisions are being made and, in light of this, to make recommendations on integrated management of water, food, energy and the environment that contribute to sustainability and improved resilience to climate change. The assessment will demonstrate the value of a Nexus approach and underpins the dialogue and capacity building initiatives undertaken in the rest of the project.
SDG gender and equity ……women and ethnic minority smallholders in the uplands, the resilience of their livelihoods is frequently constrained by the lack of productive resources or assets, social, cultural and language barriers, and limited opportunities to participate in decision-making at multiple levels
In changing or replacing livelihoods in the context of hydropower development, it is important to disaggregate the costs and benefits to women and men, as well as ethnic groups separately. These costs and benefits need to be assessed not only in material, but in relational and subjective terms as well. Based on a social well-being conceptual framework, and a qualitative livelihoods trajectory tool this can be done.
In the resettlement site, men and women had to adapt to a new area and lifestyle where traditional livelihood activities have been significantly changed and the new livelihood options had different implications to men and women. For example;
Upland rice - men’s control limited by new land use patterns (material, relational and subjective costs)
Fishing – men’s control has increased (material benefits)
Riverbank gardening – women’s control has decreased (material costs)
NTFP – women’s control has decreased (material costs)
Weaving – women’s control has increased (material and subjective benefits)
Livestock – women’s control unchanged; men’s control over cattle decreased (material costs)
Education – men’s control unchanged but women have increased participation in decisions (relational and subjective benefits)
This provides insights into why some household members may accept and others reject livelihood options offered by hydropower development.