Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Capacity development for poverty reduction

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige

Hier ansehen

1 von 17 Anzeige

Capacity development for poverty reduction

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Presented by Gebisa Ejeta at the ISPC Science Forum 2016, Addis Ababa, 12-14 April 2016

Presented by Gebisa Ejeta at the ISPC Science Forum 2016, Addis Ababa, 12-14 April 2016

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Andere mochten auch (20)

Anzeige

Ähnlich wie Capacity development for poverty reduction (20)

Weitere von Independent Science and Partnership Council of the CGIAR (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Capacity development for poverty reduction

  1. 1. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR POVERTY REDUCTION Gebisa Ejeta Purdue University 13 April 2016
  2. 2. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Mobilizing Science 1. Improve linkages between the CGIAR and the Advanced Research Institutions. 2. Promote linkages between the CGIAR and institutions involved in product development and deployment (NARS, SMEs etc). 1. Start a Science Forum to increase visibility for science for development with donors, policy makers, and other stakeholders.
  3. 3. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org The Out-Cry about Observed R4D Impact: • Massive amount of resources (internal and external) have been invested for Ag R4D in Africa since independence. • Foreign aid, equipment, education, research investments • Some argue that R4D could not be as successful because massive efforts have not hit the fundamental problem, the cultural and behavioral cord. • Human and Institutional Strengthening Efforts more ad hoc • Is something wrong with the Ag Sector. Can we learn from our Health Colleagues, how to mobilize more effectively. • The limited drive to excellence for lack of models/examples: “A catch 22 for African institutions”
  4. 4. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Why HICD? We cannot continue to deliver Technical Assistance a’ la Disaster Assistance (via NGOs, CSO, FBO, CBO, etc.); not sustainable! The mobile telephone technology is encouraging, but not too good a model for Ag Development! The Private Sector works better if complemented by strong and functional Public Institutions (PPP)! Systematically building strong institutions, perhaps slow, but it is the surest path for achieving SDGs!
  5. 5. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org HICD is a serious concern and agenda for poor nations, whether they realize it or not. General decline in the human capital base, and the failure to build and/or sustain local institutions. This decline may be the greatest threat to the gains that we have made in poor nations. Considering current developments around the world, a continent of literate, but unemployed youth is not good!
  6. 6. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org CAPACITY BUILDING IN RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT: Education & training are central to development efforts. CB entails enhancing the scientific, technical, organizational, managerial, and policy making capacity of personnel,… so that the nation’s ability to evaluate, analyze, prioritize, and address crucial issues that impede planned implementation of development options. It encompasses, individuals, institutions, communities, and governments. For individuals, it implies programs beyond training, mentors and mentoring….
  7. 7. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Human and Institutional Capacity Building: Need be seen as vital to the many well-intentioned programs, that governments, foundations, and international agencies conduct. HICD must also be recognized as the way to likely reduce hunger and poverty, effect livelihood change, and ensure sustainability. In poor nations, nothing can be done, much less sustained without local capacity!
  8. 8. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Human and Institutional Capacity Needs: (Goal: Science-based agricultural development) The capacity of Individuals, Programs, Institutions, Communities, and Nation need to be built up. Education, Research, Production-Systems, Delivery Systems, Delivery Systems, Value-addition, Markets, Support-Services, Policy-Making, Leadership, Governance….. The need is indeed great!
  9. 9. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Problems that Limit Capacity Building Potential in Poor Nations: Limited tertiary educational scholarships for students from Africa in Western nations CGIAR programs linked with NARS only as rare grant opportunities allow, mostly on IPG mode, Few if any CG and other Developing Projects are embedded within NARS Current R4D efforts more in project mode than “Programs” Major Donors fund CGIAR and NGOs directly, but rarely fund NARS The need for wealthy nations to elevate capacity building as a policy tool and to integrate it with diplomacy and defense as a linchpin of national security.
  10. 10. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org HICD Successes: Examples from Brazil, China, India Public-Private-Partnerships in a growing Ag Sector Programs vs Projects for catalyzing development
  11. 11. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Decline in Investments for Capacity Building : • Too costly for an agency to sponsor capacity building Programs. • It can be handled as supplements to multi-year R&D Programming. • Likening HICD to conducting workshops or virtual networks. These thoughts undermine the critical importance of HICD as a foundation for a functional R4D efforts.
  12. 12. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Recent Expansion in Higher Education in Africa: The dawn of the 21st century brought about an interesting opportunity for CB in Africa. Many universities built in short period of time. Students came in large numbers. African universities struggling and hard-pressed just to provide basic knowledge and to offer some technical skills. Limited opportunities for scholarships to Western universities Great time to partner with African univ. & governments.
  13. 13. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org The 3 R’s of Capacity Building: “Recruitment—Retention—Reward” Human beings respond to incentives. Education that leads to high skills leads to economic opportunity. Excellence in higher education helps a country to be technologically innovative, and economically competitive!
  14. 14. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org To fellow scientists, development practitioners, agency grant officers, and professionals in the greater technical assistance field, It is not about us! Reducing poverty in poor nations is fundamentally, the responsibility of the countries themselves. Internal resolve and commitment is key; but because the need is enormous, and the benefit mutual for rich and poor nations, a concerted effort is advised!!
  15. 15. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org The Research for Development (R4A) Mantra and the Need for Generating Impact: A more functional alignment is needed • CGIAR operates with “International Public Good” as its official research outcome, though it engages in the impact pathways at places. Who then is responsible for next steps? • Most NARS lack the capacity to develop locally adapted products and technologies, • Extension Services lack the capacity to meet to deliver products and services to farmers, • Private-sector, SMEs fledgling, not strong enough to step in to deliver on the promise, • Donor agencies continue to fund the CGIAR and others to have their respective projects, unlinked to a path, • The currency measured for CG accountability is IPGs, and not the desired result (“developmental impact”).
  16. 16. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Food for thought: two key messages, going forward: 1. Institutions are indeed vital, but they need to interconnected. There is great need to bring donors, CGIAR, ARIs, NARS, the Private sector to start a new dialogue to revisit the IPG mandate of CGIAR and their implications on developmental impact. 1. An Impact Pathway vision is great. For greater success, R4D professionals and their institutions need to worry about the next one or two steps in the discovery to delivery continuum (pathway) to generate success.
  17. 17. Agricultural research for rural prosperity: Rethinking the pathways www.scienceforum2016.org Thank you!

×