SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 45
Time Boxing & Agile Models
Sofware Process 2
Time boxing
 Time boxing – fix an iteration duration, determine
specs. acc.
 Development is done iteratively in fixed duration
time boxes
 Each time box divided in fixed stages
 Each stage approximately equal in duration
 Each stage performs a clearly defined task that can
be done independently
 Use pipelining concepts to execute iterations in
Sofware Process 3
Time Boxed Iterations
 General iterative
development – fix the
functionality for each
iteration, then plan and
execute it
 In time boxed
iterations – fix the
duration of iteration
and adjust the
functionality to fit in
◦ Completion time is fixed,
the functionality to be
delivered is flexible
Sofware Process 4
Example
 An iteration with three stages – Analyis,
Build, Deploy
◦ These stages are appx. equal in many situations
◦ Can adjust durations by determining the
boundaries
◦ Can adjust duration by adjusting the team size
for each stage
 There is a dedicated team for each stage
(A, B, and D)
 When one stage team finishes, it hands
over the project to the next team -
Pipelining
Sofware Process 5
Timeboxing Execution
Software
Requirements Build Deploy
TB1
TB2
Requirements Build Deploy
TB2
Requirements Build Deploy
TB3
Requirements Build Deploy
TB4
Sofware Process 6
Pipelined Execution
 AT starts executing it-1
 AT finishes, hands over it-1 to BT,
starts executing it-2
 AT finishes it-2, hands over to BT; BT
finishes it-1, hands over to DT; AT
starts it-3, BT starts it-2 (and DT, it-1)
 …
Sofware Process 7
Time boxed Iteration usage
 This itself very useful in many situations
 Has predictable delivery times
 Overall product release and marketing can be
better planned
 Makes time a non-negotiable parameter and
helps focus attention on schedule
 Prevents requirements bloating
 Overall dev. time is still unchanged
Sofware Process 8
Timeboxing execution
 First iteration finishes at time T
 Second finishes at T+T/3; third at T+2 T/3,
and so on
 In steady state, delivery every T/3 time
 If T is 3 weeks, first delivery after 3 wks, 2nd
after 4 wks, 3rd after 5 wks,…
 In linear execution, delivery times will be 3
wks, 6 wks, 9 wks,…
Sofware Process 9
Timeboxing execution
 Duration of each iteration still the same
 Total work done in a time box is also the same
 Productivity of a time box is same
 Yet, average cycle time or delivery time has
reduced to a third
Sofware Process 10
Team Size
 In linear execution of iterations, the same
team performs all stages
 If each stage has a team of S, in linear
execution the team size is S
 In pipelined execution, the team size is
three times (one for each stage)
 I.e. the total team size in time boxing is
larger; and this reduces cycle time
Sofware Process 11
Work Allocation of Teams
Requirements
Team
Requirements
Analysis for TB1
Requirements
Analysis for TB3
Requirements
Analysis for TB2
Requirements
Analysis for TB4
Build Team
Deployment
Team
Build for TB1 Build for TB2 Build for TB3
Deployment for TB1Deployment for TB2
Build for TB4
Deployment for TB3
Requirements
Team
Requirements
Analysis for TB1
Requirements
Analysis for TB3
Requirements
Analysis for TB2
Requirements
Analysis for TB4
Build Team
Deployment
Team
Build for TB1 Build for TB2 Build for TB3
Deployment for TB1Deployment for TB2
Build for TB4
Deployment for TB3
Sofware Process 12
Team Size
 Merely by increasing the team size we
cannot reduce cycle time - Brook’s law
 Time boxing allows structured way to add
manpower to reduce cycle time
 Note that we cannot change the time of an
iteration – Brook’s law still holds
 Work allocation different to allow larger
team to function properly
Sofware Process 13
Timeboxing
 Advantages: Shortened delivery times,
iterative, distributed execution
 Disadvantages: Larger teams, proj. mgmt
is harder, high synchronization needed, CM
is harder
 Applicability: When short delivery times v.
imp.; architecture is stable; flexibility in
feature grouping
Agile Models
 Iterative + incremental process
 Focus -> flexibility in producing software quickly and
capably
 Agile:
◦ break the product into small incremental builds.
◦ these builds are provided in iterations.
◦ each iteration typically lasts from about one to three
weeks
◦ At the end of the iteration, a working product is
displayed to the customer and important
stakeholders
 Following are the Agile manifesto principles:
◦ Value individuals and interactions over process
and tools
◦ Prefer to invest time in producing working
software rather than in producing comprehensive
documentation
◦ Focus on continuous customer collaboration to
get proper product requirements.
◦ Responding to change rather than on creating a
plan and then following it
Agility Principles
1) Highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early
and continuous delivery of valuable software.
2) Welcome changing requirements, even late in
development.
3) Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of
weeks to months
4) Business people and developers must work together
daily throughout the project.
5) Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them
the environment and support they need, and trust
them to get the job done.
6) The most efficient and effective method of conveying
information to and within a development team is face-
to-face conversation.
7) Working software is the primary measure of
progress.
8) Agile processes promote sustainable development.
The sponsors, developers, and users should be
able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
9) Continuous attention to technical excellence and
good design enhances agility
10) Simplicity–the art of maximizing the amount of
work not done–is essential.
11) The best architectures, requirements, and designs
emerge from self-organizing teams
12) At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to
become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its
behavior accordingly.
THE POLITICS OF AGILE DEVELOPMENT
 Jim Highsmith states “Traditional methodologists
are a bunch of stick-in-the-muds who’d rather
produce flawless documentation than a working
system that meets business needs”.
 As a counterpart he states “Light-weight, ‘agile’
methodologists are a bunch of glorified hackers
who are going to be in for a heck of a surprise
when they try to scale up their toys into enterprise-
wide software”
 Customer Interaction (backbone), Open
communication with minimum documentation -
Agile methodology
Agile Vs Traditional SDLC
Models
 Agile is based on the adaptive software development
methods
 Traditional SDLC models like the waterfall model is based on
a predictive approach.
 Predictive methods depend on the requirement analysis
and planning done in the beginning of cycle with strict
change management
 In Adaptive approach, feature driven development and the
team adapts to the changing product requirements
dynamically.
Human Factors
Some of fundamental characteristics and skills that will facilitate the
implementation of agile practices at its core.
1) Competency: The staff should be competent in knowing
software and the technologies
2) Collaboration:
◦ Ability to work in a team
◦ Cooperate among themselves involved in project
3) Focus:
◦ Common goal:
“Deliver customer an increment of working software in
agreed time”
◦ Continuous adaptations, always improving the process as
needed.
4) Decision making:
◦ Development team should have freedom, in technical
matters and project.
◦ Company can suggest good practice, but in the end is
the staff (self-organizing) which will adopt the methods or
processes that you think best.
◦ Development team must learn to deal with conflicting
situations, ambiguity and frequent changes, which will
facilitate the continual improvement process.
4) Trust and respect:
◦ Team must be consistent
◦ Team demonstrate trust and respect needed to make a
strong team.
◦ Main Objective: Make the team strong enough that the
whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
5) Self organization:
◦ Self organized Team to perform the work.
◦ Continuous evaluation for process improvement
◦ Self organization has technical benefits : Team selects
how much work believed to be capable of performing the
iteration and commits.
There Is Nothing Noble In Being Superior
To Your Fellow Man; True Nobility Is Being
Superior To Your Former Self.
Some Agile Methods
 Rapid Application Development (RAD)
 Extreme Programming (XP)
 Rational Unify Process (RUP)
 Adaptive Software Development (ASD)
 Feature Driven Development (FDD)
 Crystal Clear
 Incremental SDLC
 Scrum
 Dynamic Software Development Method (DSDM)
Sofware Process 26
EXTREME PROGRAMMING (XP)
 eXtreme Programming (XP) is one of the most popular
 An XP project starts with user stories, which are short description
of user needs
◦ Details are not included
◦ User stories written on a separate card
 Team estimates time to implement a user story – Rough Estimates
 Release planning is done
◦ Defines which stories are to be built in which release, & release
dates
◦ Encourages Frequent and small releases
◦ Acceptance tests built from user stories; used to test before
release
◦ Bugs found in AT are fixed in next release
Sofware Process 27
XP – Overall Process
Sofware Process 28
Overall Process
 Development done in iterations of a few
weeks each
◦ Iteration starts with planning, in which stories to
be implemented are selected – high risk high
value are chosen first
◦ Details of stories obtained during the
development are implemented
◦ Failed AT of previous iteration are also fixed
Sofware Process 29
XP - Summary
 Well suited for situations where volume and
pace of requirements is high
 Customer is willing to engage heavily with
the team
 The team is collocated and is not too large
(less than 20 or so)
 Requires strong capability in team
members
 Prototyping + Iterative development with no specific
planning
 Focus:
◦ Gather customer requirements
◦ Early testing of the prototypes by the customer using iterative
concept
◦ Reuse of the existing prototypes (components)
◦ Continuous integration and rapid delivery
 No detailed preplanning - easier to incorporate the changes
 Team comprises of developers, domain experts, customer
representatives and other IT resources
Rapid Application Model (RAD)
RAD Phases
 Requirements planning phase
◦ Structured discussion of business problems
◦ Does System planning and analysis
◦ Users, managers, and IT staff members discuss and
agree on business needs, project scope, constraints,
and system requirements.
◦ It ends when the team agrees on the key issues and
obtains management authorization to continue
 User description phase
◦ automated tools capture information from users
◦ Users interact with systems analysts and develop models
and prototypes that represent all system processes,
inputs, and outputs.
◦ Use tools & techniques to translate user needs into
working models.
◦ Continuous interactive process to understand, modify,
and eventually approve a working model.
 Construction phase
◦ Uses productivity tools, such as code generators,
screen generators, etc. inside a time-box. (“Do
until done”)
◦ Users continue to participate and suggest
changes or improvements
◦ Tasks are programming and application
development, coding, unit-integration, and
system testing.
 Cutover phase
◦ System installation, user acceptance testing and
user training
◦ Resembles the final tasks
◦ New system is built, delivered, and placed in
operation
◦ Tasks are data conversion, full-scale testing,
system changeover, user training.
RAD Strengths
 Changing requirements can be accommodated.
 Progress can be measured.
 Iteration time can be short with use of powerful
RAD tools.
 Productivity with fewer people in a short time.
 Reduced development time.
 Increases reusability of components.
 Quick initial reviews occur.
 Encourages customer feedback.
 Integration from very beginning solves a lot of
integration issues.
RAD Weaknesses
 Dependency on technically strong team members for
identifying business requirements.
 Only system that can be modularized can be built using RAD.
 Requires highly skilled developers/designers.
 High dependency on modeling skills.
 Inapplicable to cheaper projects as cost of modeling and
automated code generation is very high.
 Management complexity is more.
 Suitable for systems that are component based and scalable.
 Requires user involvement throughout the life cycle.
 Suitable for project requiring shorter development times.
When to use RAD
 Reasonably well-known requirements
 User involved throughout the life cycle
 Project can be time-boxed
 Functionality delivered in increments
 High performance not required
 Low technical risks
 System can be modularized
Sofware Process 39
Rational Unified
Process(RUP)
 Iterative model
 Software development is divided into cycles, each
cycle delivering a fully working system
 Each cycle executed as separate project
 Execution of a cycle is broken into four consecutive
phases, each phase ending with a milestone
achievement
Sofware Process 40
Phases in a Project
◦ Inception phase: ends with Lifecycle Objectives
milestone; vision and high level capability of
system defined
◦ Elaboration phase: Lifecycle architecture
milestone; most requirements defined and
architecture designed
◦ Construction phase: Initial operational
capability milestone
◦ Transition phase: Product release; transition
product from development to production
Sofware Process 41
Phases and Milestones
Sofware Process 42
Execution of phases
 Each phase itself can be done in multiple
iterations, each iteration having an
external/internal customer
 Generally construction has multiple
iterations; elaboration can also be
meaningfully done in multiple iterations
Advantages of Agile Model
 Realistic approach
 Promotes teamwork and cross training
 Flexibility to developers
 Functionality can be developed rapidly and
demonstrated
 Resource requirements are minimum.
 Suitable for fixed or changing requirements
 Delivers early partial working solutions
 Good model for environments that change steadily
 Minimal rules, documentation easily employed
 Enables concurrent development and delivery within an
overall planned context.
 Little or no planning required
 Easy to manage
Disadvantages of Agile Model
 Not suitable for handling complex dependencies.
 More risk of sustainability, maintainability and extensibility.
 Strict delivery management
 Depends heavily on customer interaction, so if customer is
not clear, team can be driven in the wrong direction.
 High individual dependency, since there is minimum
documentation generated.
 Transfer of technology to new team members may be quite
challenging due to lack of documentation.
Sofware Process 45
Summary
 Process is a means to achieve project objectives of high
QP
 Process models define generic process, which can form
basis of project process
 Process typically has stages, each stage focusing on an
identifiable task
 Many models for development process have been
proposed
 Model should be selected based on the nature of the
problem

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Chapter 9 software maintenance
Chapter 9 software maintenanceChapter 9 software maintenance
Chapter 9 software maintenancedespicable me
 
Software reliability growth model
Software reliability growth modelSoftware reliability growth model
Software reliability growth modelHimanshu
 
Phased life cycle model
Phased life cycle modelPhased life cycle model
Phased life cycle modelStephennancy
 
User Interface Analysis and Design
User Interface Analysis and DesignUser Interface Analysis and Design
User Interface Analysis and Design Saqib Raza
 
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering arvind pandey
 
Software engineering note
Software engineering noteSoftware engineering note
Software engineering noteNeelamani Samal
 
Unified process model
Unified process modelUnified process model
Unified process modelRyndaMaala
 
States, state graphs and transition testing
States, state graphs and transition testingStates, state graphs and transition testing
States, state graphs and transition testinggeethawilliam
 
Software Process Models
Software Process ModelsSoftware Process Models
Software Process ModelsAtul Karmyal
 
Basic communication operations - One to all Broadcast
Basic communication operations - One to all BroadcastBasic communication operations - One to all Broadcast
Basic communication operations - One to all BroadcastRashiJoshi11
 
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Software Configuration Management (SCM)Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Software Configuration Management (SCM)Er. Shiva K. Shrestha
 
Uml with detail
Uml with detailUml with detail
Uml with detailHamza Khan
 
Software Engineering - Ch1
Software Engineering - Ch1Software Engineering - Ch1
Software Engineering - Ch1Siddharth Ayer
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Chapter 9 software maintenance
Chapter 9 software maintenanceChapter 9 software maintenance
Chapter 9 software maintenance
 
Software Engineering by Pankaj Jalote
Software Engineering by Pankaj JaloteSoftware Engineering by Pankaj Jalote
Software Engineering by Pankaj Jalote
 
Distributed database
Distributed databaseDistributed database
Distributed database
 
Software reliability growth model
Software reliability growth modelSoftware reliability growth model
Software reliability growth model
 
Phased life cycle model
Phased life cycle modelPhased life cycle model
Phased life cycle model
 
User Interface Analysis and Design
User Interface Analysis and DesignUser Interface Analysis and Design
User Interface Analysis and Design
 
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering
Unit 5- Architectural Design in software engineering
 
Software engineering note
Software engineering noteSoftware engineering note
Software engineering note
 
Unified process model
Unified process modelUnified process model
Unified process model
 
Chapter 2 software process models
Chapter 2   software process modelsChapter 2   software process models
Chapter 2 software process models
 
Formal Methods
Formal MethodsFormal Methods
Formal Methods
 
States, state graphs and transition testing
States, state graphs and transition testingStates, state graphs and transition testing
States, state graphs and transition testing
 
Software Process Models
Software Process ModelsSoftware Process Models
Software Process Models
 
Basic communication operations - One to all Broadcast
Basic communication operations - One to all BroadcastBasic communication operations - One to all Broadcast
Basic communication operations - One to all Broadcast
 
Component based software engineering
Component based software engineeringComponent based software engineering
Component based software engineering
 
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Software Configuration Management (SCM)Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
 
Uml with detail
Uml with detailUml with detail
Uml with detail
 
Software Quality Metrics
Software Quality MetricsSoftware Quality Metrics
Software Quality Metrics
 
Software Engineering - Ch1
Software Engineering - Ch1Software Engineering - Ch1
Software Engineering - Ch1
 
Software Engineering
Software EngineeringSoftware Engineering
Software Engineering
 

Ähnlich wie Chapter 2 Time boxing & agile models

Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnz
Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnzLecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnz
Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnzAhmadSajjad34
 
Seminar on Crystal Clear
Seminar on Crystal ClearSeminar on Crystal Clear
Seminar on Crystal ClearPaolo Farina
 
Agile Development unleashed
Agile Development unleashedAgile Development unleashed
Agile Development unleashedlivgeni
 
Agile Methodology - Software Engineering
Agile Methodology - Software EngineeringAgile Methodology - Software Engineering
Agile Methodology - Software EngineeringPurvik Rana
 
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.pptIntroduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.pptMohan Late
 
Introduction to Agile & scrum
Introduction to Agile & scrumIntroduction to Agile & scrum
Introduction to Agile & scrumElad Sofer
 
Introduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringIntroduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringSaqib Raza
 
Lecture3.se.pptx
Lecture3.se.pptxLecture3.se.pptx
Lecture3.se.pptxAmna Ch
 
Lean as Agile methodology – A Study
Lean as Agile methodology – A StudyLean as Agile methodology – A Study
Lean as Agile methodology – A StudyEswar Publications
 
Ssw forte-agile-seminar
Ssw forte-agile-seminarSsw forte-agile-seminar
Ssw forte-agile-seminarSSW
 

Ähnlich wie Chapter 2 Time boxing & agile models (20)

Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnz
Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnzLecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnz
Lecture 5 -6(CSC205).pptx jsksnxbbxjxksnsnz
 
Seminar on Crystal Clear
Seminar on Crystal ClearSeminar on Crystal Clear
Seminar on Crystal Clear
 
Agile Development unleashed
Agile Development unleashedAgile Development unleashed
Agile Development unleashed
 
Agile
AgileAgile
Agile
 
Agile process
Agile processAgile process
Agile process
 
Agile Methodology - Software Engineering
Agile Methodology - Software EngineeringAgile Methodology - Software Engineering
Agile Methodology - Software Engineering
 
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.pptIntroduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
 
Introduction to Agile & scrum
Introduction to Agile & scrumIntroduction to Agile & scrum
Introduction to Agile & scrum
 
Introduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringIntroduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software Engineering
 
Lecture3.se.pptx
Lecture3.se.pptxLecture3.se.pptx
Lecture3.se.pptx
 
Lect7
Lect7Lect7
Lect7
 
Lect7
Lect7Lect7
Lect7
 
Lean as Agile methodology – A Study
Lean as Agile methodology – A StudyLean as Agile methodology – A Study
Lean as Agile methodology – A Study
 
agile.ppt
agile.pptagile.ppt
agile.ppt
 
agile.ppt
agile.pptagile.ppt
agile.ppt
 
agile.ppt
agile.pptagile.ppt
agile.ppt
 
Agile
AgileAgile
Agile
 
agile.ppt
agile.pptagile.ppt
agile.ppt
 
Scrun Safe Ppt.pptx
Scrun Safe Ppt.pptxScrun Safe Ppt.pptx
Scrun Safe Ppt.pptx
 
Ssw forte-agile-seminar
Ssw forte-agile-seminarSsw forte-agile-seminar
Ssw forte-agile-seminar
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvRicaMaeCastro1
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Developmentchesterberbo7
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4JOYLYNSAMANIEGO
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalssuser3e220a
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptxDhatriParmar
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfPrerana Jadhav
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptxmary850239
 
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptxweek 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptxJonalynLegaspi2
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxkarenfajardo43
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationdeepaannamalai16
 
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17Celine George
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxlancelewisportillo
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
 
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTAParadigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
 
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of EngineeringFaculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operational
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
 
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptxweek 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
 
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17
How to Fix XML SyntaxError in Odoo the 17
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
 

Chapter 2 Time boxing & agile models

  • 1. Time Boxing & Agile Models
  • 2. Sofware Process 2 Time boxing  Time boxing – fix an iteration duration, determine specs. acc.  Development is done iteratively in fixed duration time boxes  Each time box divided in fixed stages  Each stage approximately equal in duration  Each stage performs a clearly defined task that can be done independently  Use pipelining concepts to execute iterations in
  • 3. Sofware Process 3 Time Boxed Iterations  General iterative development – fix the functionality for each iteration, then plan and execute it  In time boxed iterations – fix the duration of iteration and adjust the functionality to fit in ◦ Completion time is fixed, the functionality to be delivered is flexible
  • 4. Sofware Process 4 Example  An iteration with three stages – Analyis, Build, Deploy ◦ These stages are appx. equal in many situations ◦ Can adjust durations by determining the boundaries ◦ Can adjust duration by adjusting the team size for each stage  There is a dedicated team for each stage (A, B, and D)  When one stage team finishes, it hands over the project to the next team - Pipelining
  • 5. Sofware Process 5 Timeboxing Execution Software Requirements Build Deploy TB1 TB2 Requirements Build Deploy TB2 Requirements Build Deploy TB3 Requirements Build Deploy TB4
  • 6. Sofware Process 6 Pipelined Execution  AT starts executing it-1  AT finishes, hands over it-1 to BT, starts executing it-2  AT finishes it-2, hands over to BT; BT finishes it-1, hands over to DT; AT starts it-3, BT starts it-2 (and DT, it-1)  …
  • 7. Sofware Process 7 Time boxed Iteration usage  This itself very useful in many situations  Has predictable delivery times  Overall product release and marketing can be better planned  Makes time a non-negotiable parameter and helps focus attention on schedule  Prevents requirements bloating  Overall dev. time is still unchanged
  • 8. Sofware Process 8 Timeboxing execution  First iteration finishes at time T  Second finishes at T+T/3; third at T+2 T/3, and so on  In steady state, delivery every T/3 time  If T is 3 weeks, first delivery after 3 wks, 2nd after 4 wks, 3rd after 5 wks,…  In linear execution, delivery times will be 3 wks, 6 wks, 9 wks,…
  • 9. Sofware Process 9 Timeboxing execution  Duration of each iteration still the same  Total work done in a time box is also the same  Productivity of a time box is same  Yet, average cycle time or delivery time has reduced to a third
  • 10. Sofware Process 10 Team Size  In linear execution of iterations, the same team performs all stages  If each stage has a team of S, in linear execution the team size is S  In pipelined execution, the team size is three times (one for each stage)  I.e. the total team size in time boxing is larger; and this reduces cycle time
  • 11. Sofware Process 11 Work Allocation of Teams Requirements Team Requirements Analysis for TB1 Requirements Analysis for TB3 Requirements Analysis for TB2 Requirements Analysis for TB4 Build Team Deployment Team Build for TB1 Build for TB2 Build for TB3 Deployment for TB1Deployment for TB2 Build for TB4 Deployment for TB3 Requirements Team Requirements Analysis for TB1 Requirements Analysis for TB3 Requirements Analysis for TB2 Requirements Analysis for TB4 Build Team Deployment Team Build for TB1 Build for TB2 Build for TB3 Deployment for TB1Deployment for TB2 Build for TB4 Deployment for TB3
  • 12. Sofware Process 12 Team Size  Merely by increasing the team size we cannot reduce cycle time - Brook’s law  Time boxing allows structured way to add manpower to reduce cycle time  Note that we cannot change the time of an iteration – Brook’s law still holds  Work allocation different to allow larger team to function properly
  • 13. Sofware Process 13 Timeboxing  Advantages: Shortened delivery times, iterative, distributed execution  Disadvantages: Larger teams, proj. mgmt is harder, high synchronization needed, CM is harder  Applicability: When short delivery times v. imp.; architecture is stable; flexibility in feature grouping
  • 14. Agile Models  Iterative + incremental process  Focus -> flexibility in producing software quickly and capably  Agile: ◦ break the product into small incremental builds. ◦ these builds are provided in iterations. ◦ each iteration typically lasts from about one to three weeks ◦ At the end of the iteration, a working product is displayed to the customer and important stakeholders
  • 15.
  • 16.  Following are the Agile manifesto principles: ◦ Value individuals and interactions over process and tools ◦ Prefer to invest time in producing working software rather than in producing comprehensive documentation ◦ Focus on continuous customer collaboration to get proper product requirements. ◦ Responding to change rather than on creating a plan and then following it
  • 17. Agility Principles 1) Highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software. 2) Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. 3) Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to months 4) Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project. 5) Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done. 6) The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face- to-face conversation.
  • 18. 7) Working software is the primary measure of progress. 8) Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely. 9) Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility 10) Simplicity–the art of maximizing the amount of work not done–is essential. 11) The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams 12) At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly.
  • 19. THE POLITICS OF AGILE DEVELOPMENT  Jim Highsmith states “Traditional methodologists are a bunch of stick-in-the-muds who’d rather produce flawless documentation than a working system that meets business needs”.  As a counterpart he states “Light-weight, ‘agile’ methodologists are a bunch of glorified hackers who are going to be in for a heck of a surprise when they try to scale up their toys into enterprise- wide software”  Customer Interaction (backbone), Open communication with minimum documentation - Agile methodology
  • 20. Agile Vs Traditional SDLC Models  Agile is based on the adaptive software development methods  Traditional SDLC models like the waterfall model is based on a predictive approach.  Predictive methods depend on the requirement analysis and planning done in the beginning of cycle with strict change management  In Adaptive approach, feature driven development and the team adapts to the changing product requirements dynamically.
  • 21. Human Factors Some of fundamental characteristics and skills that will facilitate the implementation of agile practices at its core. 1) Competency: The staff should be competent in knowing software and the technologies 2) Collaboration: ◦ Ability to work in a team ◦ Cooperate among themselves involved in project 3) Focus: ◦ Common goal: “Deliver customer an increment of working software in agreed time” ◦ Continuous adaptations, always improving the process as needed.
  • 22. 4) Decision making: ◦ Development team should have freedom, in technical matters and project. ◦ Company can suggest good practice, but in the end is the staff (self-organizing) which will adopt the methods or processes that you think best. ◦ Development team must learn to deal with conflicting situations, ambiguity and frequent changes, which will facilitate the continual improvement process.
  • 23. 4) Trust and respect: ◦ Team must be consistent ◦ Team demonstrate trust and respect needed to make a strong team. ◦ Main Objective: Make the team strong enough that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. 5) Self organization: ◦ Self organized Team to perform the work. ◦ Continuous evaluation for process improvement ◦ Self organization has technical benefits : Team selects how much work believed to be capable of performing the iteration and commits.
  • 24. There Is Nothing Noble In Being Superior To Your Fellow Man; True Nobility Is Being Superior To Your Former Self.
  • 25. Some Agile Methods  Rapid Application Development (RAD)  Extreme Programming (XP)  Rational Unify Process (RUP)  Adaptive Software Development (ASD)  Feature Driven Development (FDD)  Crystal Clear  Incremental SDLC  Scrum  Dynamic Software Development Method (DSDM)
  • 26. Sofware Process 26 EXTREME PROGRAMMING (XP)  eXtreme Programming (XP) is one of the most popular  An XP project starts with user stories, which are short description of user needs ◦ Details are not included ◦ User stories written on a separate card  Team estimates time to implement a user story – Rough Estimates  Release planning is done ◦ Defines which stories are to be built in which release, & release dates ◦ Encourages Frequent and small releases ◦ Acceptance tests built from user stories; used to test before release ◦ Bugs found in AT are fixed in next release
  • 27. Sofware Process 27 XP – Overall Process
  • 28. Sofware Process 28 Overall Process  Development done in iterations of a few weeks each ◦ Iteration starts with planning, in which stories to be implemented are selected – high risk high value are chosen first ◦ Details of stories obtained during the development are implemented ◦ Failed AT of previous iteration are also fixed
  • 29. Sofware Process 29 XP - Summary  Well suited for situations where volume and pace of requirements is high  Customer is willing to engage heavily with the team  The team is collocated and is not too large (less than 20 or so)  Requires strong capability in team members
  • 30.  Prototyping + Iterative development with no specific planning  Focus: ◦ Gather customer requirements ◦ Early testing of the prototypes by the customer using iterative concept ◦ Reuse of the existing prototypes (components) ◦ Continuous integration and rapid delivery  No detailed preplanning - easier to incorporate the changes  Team comprises of developers, domain experts, customer representatives and other IT resources Rapid Application Model (RAD)
  • 31.
  • 32. RAD Phases  Requirements planning phase ◦ Structured discussion of business problems ◦ Does System planning and analysis ◦ Users, managers, and IT staff members discuss and agree on business needs, project scope, constraints, and system requirements. ◦ It ends when the team agrees on the key issues and obtains management authorization to continue
  • 33.  User description phase ◦ automated tools capture information from users ◦ Users interact with systems analysts and develop models and prototypes that represent all system processes, inputs, and outputs. ◦ Use tools & techniques to translate user needs into working models. ◦ Continuous interactive process to understand, modify, and eventually approve a working model.
  • 34.  Construction phase ◦ Uses productivity tools, such as code generators, screen generators, etc. inside a time-box. (“Do until done”) ◦ Users continue to participate and suggest changes or improvements ◦ Tasks are programming and application development, coding, unit-integration, and system testing.
  • 35.  Cutover phase ◦ System installation, user acceptance testing and user training ◦ Resembles the final tasks ◦ New system is built, delivered, and placed in operation ◦ Tasks are data conversion, full-scale testing, system changeover, user training.
  • 36. RAD Strengths  Changing requirements can be accommodated.  Progress can be measured.  Iteration time can be short with use of powerful RAD tools.  Productivity with fewer people in a short time.  Reduced development time.  Increases reusability of components.  Quick initial reviews occur.  Encourages customer feedback.  Integration from very beginning solves a lot of integration issues.
  • 37. RAD Weaknesses  Dependency on technically strong team members for identifying business requirements.  Only system that can be modularized can be built using RAD.  Requires highly skilled developers/designers.  High dependency on modeling skills.  Inapplicable to cheaper projects as cost of modeling and automated code generation is very high.  Management complexity is more.  Suitable for systems that are component based and scalable.  Requires user involvement throughout the life cycle.  Suitable for project requiring shorter development times.
  • 38. When to use RAD  Reasonably well-known requirements  User involved throughout the life cycle  Project can be time-boxed  Functionality delivered in increments  High performance not required  Low technical risks  System can be modularized
  • 39. Sofware Process 39 Rational Unified Process(RUP)  Iterative model  Software development is divided into cycles, each cycle delivering a fully working system  Each cycle executed as separate project  Execution of a cycle is broken into four consecutive phases, each phase ending with a milestone achievement
  • 40. Sofware Process 40 Phases in a Project ◦ Inception phase: ends with Lifecycle Objectives milestone; vision and high level capability of system defined ◦ Elaboration phase: Lifecycle architecture milestone; most requirements defined and architecture designed ◦ Construction phase: Initial operational capability milestone ◦ Transition phase: Product release; transition product from development to production
  • 41. Sofware Process 41 Phases and Milestones
  • 42. Sofware Process 42 Execution of phases  Each phase itself can be done in multiple iterations, each iteration having an external/internal customer  Generally construction has multiple iterations; elaboration can also be meaningfully done in multiple iterations
  • 43. Advantages of Agile Model  Realistic approach  Promotes teamwork and cross training  Flexibility to developers  Functionality can be developed rapidly and demonstrated  Resource requirements are minimum.  Suitable for fixed or changing requirements  Delivers early partial working solutions  Good model for environments that change steadily  Minimal rules, documentation easily employed  Enables concurrent development and delivery within an overall planned context.  Little or no planning required  Easy to manage
  • 44. Disadvantages of Agile Model  Not suitable for handling complex dependencies.  More risk of sustainability, maintainability and extensibility.  Strict delivery management  Depends heavily on customer interaction, so if customer is not clear, team can be driven in the wrong direction.  High individual dependency, since there is minimum documentation generated.  Transfer of technology to new team members may be quite challenging due to lack of documentation.
  • 45. Sofware Process 45 Summary  Process is a means to achieve project objectives of high QP  Process models define generic process, which can form basis of project process  Process typically has stages, each stage focusing on an identifiable task  Many models for development process have been proposed  Model should be selected based on the nature of the problem

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. imeboxing is a planning technique common in planning projects (typically for software development), where the schedule is divided into a number of separate time periods (timeboxes, normally two to six weeks long), with each part having its own deliverables, deadline and budget. Timeboxing is a core aspect of rapid application development (RAD) software development processes such as dynamic systems development method (DSDM) and agile software development. Timeboxes are used as a form of risk management, especially for tasks that may easily extend past their deadlines. The end date (deadline) is one of the primary drivers in the planning and should not be changed as it is usually linked to a delivery date of the product. If the team exceeds the deadline, the team failed in proper planning and / or effective execution of the plan. This can be the result of: the wrong people on the wrong job (lack of communication between teams, lack of experience, lack of commitment / drive / motivation, lack of speed) or underestimation of the (complexity of the) requirements. When the team exceeds the deadline, the following actions might be taken after conferring with the Client: Dropping requirements of lower impact (the ones that will not be directly missed by the user) Working overtime to compensate for the time lost Moving the deadline