Los días 22 y 23 de junio de 2016 organizamos en la Fundación Ramón Areces un simposio internacional sobre 'Materiales bidimensionales: explorando los límites de la física y la ingeniería'. En colaboración con el Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), científicos de este prestigioso centro de investigación mostraron las propiedades únicas de materiales como el grafeno, de solo un átomo de espesor, y al mismo tiempo más resistente que el acero y mucho más ligero.
2. Thank you for your attention!
Our Mission:
Bring graphene
disruptive technologies
from European laboratories
to Europeans in ten years
space of time
2
3. About the Graphene Flagship
• The Graphene Flagship is a Future and Emerging
Technology (FET) Flagship initiated by the European
Commission (EC)
• A total budget of €1 billion, of which the EC funds
50%; the remaining 50% is funded by national sources
and by flagship partners
• Coordinated by Chalmers University of Technology,
Gothenburg, Sweden
• The project does not interfere with national programmes
or other EU initiatives but it is aligned.
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 3
4. Flagship goals I
Scientific objectives
• Material technologies for ICT and beyond
– Identify and explore new layered materials (LMs) and assess their scientific
and technological potential.
– Develop reliable, reproducible, sustainable and safe large scale production
technologies for LMs.
– Broaden the applications of graphene and other LMs beyond ICT
• Component technologies
– Identify new device concepts enabled by graphene and LMs.
– Develop component technologies that utilize the potential of these new
materials platforms.
• Systems integration
– Integrate graphene-based components to systems that provide new
functionalities.
– Integrate graphene and other LMs with existing technology platforms.
. 4
5. Operative targets
• Bring together a large core consortium of European academic and
industrial partners,.
• Create a highly effective technology transfer highway.
• Align the Flagship with European and national priorities (ERA-NET).
• Engage the European societies with the Flagship.
Societal goals
• Contribute to sustainable development based on abundant, safe
and recyclable natural resources.
• Boost economic growth in Europe by creating new jobs and
investment opportunities
5
Flagship goals II
8. Different maturity levels
Fundamental
science
- U. Lancaster
Materials
- CSIC
Environment
& Health
- U. Trieste
Opto-
electronics
- U. Cambridge
Production
- Aixtron
Spintronics
- U. Groningen
Sensors
- TU Delft
Energy
applications
- CEA
Nano-
composites
- CNR
High-freq.
electronics
- AMO GmbH
Flexible
electronics
- NOKIA
Maturity
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
8
11. Why?
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 11
“Paco Guinea effect”
CSIC , one the most cited institution
in Europe
Mobilizing Action Graphene 2012-
2013
+
12. ● Single-stage application and selection procedure
● 218 proposals received (738 applicants)
● Evaluation criteria as defined by EC rules
– Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the call)
– Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management
– Potential impact
● Process had to be in line with FP7 regulation - all process designed, implemented
and validated according to EC requirements (an independent observer reporting to
EC)
● Evaluation managed by the European Science Foundation (ESF)
● Six panels composed of 7-13 experts evaluated the proposals (over 70% outside of
Europe to avoid conflicts of interest)
● Feedback to applicants provided in the form of a consensus report
● Decision on projects to be funded by the Graphene Flagship Executive Board
based on ranking.
Open Call : Evaluation procedures
Courtesy of Ana Hellman (ESF)
13. Open Call Proposals per Topic
Topic Prop. received
01 Standardisation 9
02 Chemical sensor, bio-sensors and bio-interfaces 38
03 Membrane technologies: from nanofluidics to nanoresonators 9
04 Catalysts for energy applications 12
05 Functionalized materials for composites and energy applications 23
06 Functional coatings and interfaces in high-performance, low-weight technological
applications
27
07 Integration of graphene and related materials (GRMs) with semiconductor devices: a
scalable back-end approach
5
08 New layered materials and heterostructures 29
09 Passive components for RF-applications 8
10 Integration with Si photonics 4
11 Prototypes based on graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems 12
12 Open topic (Bottom Up) 40
13 Updating the Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-
dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems
2
Courtesy of Ana Hellman (ESF)
16. Statistics
• 66 new partners TOTAL 140 Organizations
• 33% of newcomers are companies: Productive sector
involved. Initially only 20%
• New countries represented: Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech
Republic, Estonia, Hungary and Israel
• Main Contributors : Italy (23), Germany( 23), Spain (18),
UK(17) and France(13)
17. Evolution of the Flagship 2013-2015
Year Partners Academic Industrial Other Budget/yr
2013 75 48 16 8 18 M€
2014 142 76 41 25 24 M€
2015 154 75 54 25 45 M€
Clear trend towards more industrial involvement, as planned
Involve new partners as needs arise and resources become
available (Expression of Interest mechanism)
18. Graphene Flagship Consortium
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 18
EoI launched at the end of ramp up
period: Recruiting companies
SPAIN
Airbus
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Avanzare
* The Biomedical Research Networking center in
Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine
(CIBER-BBN)
* CIC energiGUNE
CIC NanoGUNE
CSIC
Graphenea
Grupo Antolin
ICFO Institute of Photonic Sciences
ICN Catalan Institute of Nanotechnology
* Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August
Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)
* IQ Interquimica
* nVision Systems & Technologies
Repsol
* Tecnalia Research and Innovation
University of Castilla-La Mancha
* The University of Zaragoza
23 countries, 150 partners
19. Core1 period April 2016-April 2018
........the inflactionary period
continues
19
20. Flagship in H2020
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 20
Core Project 1
152 partners, 2016-18
National Projects
Regional Projects
Core Project 2
> 120 partners, 2018-20
Core Project 3
> 120 partners, 2020-
Framework Partnership
FLAG-ERA
Other EU Projects
21. Core 1 - Governance
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 21
22. Divisions and Work Packages in Core1
• The Graphene Flagship has
• Four scientific divisions
• One administrative division
• 20 Work Packages
• 15 on research and innovation
• Five on operative management aspects
• One external division
• Associated members and partnering projects
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 22
23. Association mechanisms
• In H2020: Partnering Projects and Associated Members
• Participants in Partnering Projects are expected to become
Associated Members
• First PPs are expected to emerge from the FLAG-ERA Joint
Transnational Call (13 projects), resulting in 20-30 new Ams
• AMs have the same rights as partners except
• Access to EC financing is limited to core project partners
• Non-disclosure agreements between the affected parties can
be used to give access to confidential information
• Balance between ease of association and rights
24. FLAG-ERA Partnering Projects and Core 1 WPs
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 24
FLAG-ERA JTC 2015 Projects GF Core 1 Work Packages
Theoretical investigation of electronic transport in functionalized 2D transition metal
dichalcogenides (Trans2DTMD)
WP1: Enabling Research
Atomic-scale control of graphene magnetism using hydrogen atoms (HiMagGraphene) WP1: Enabling Research
Induced Spin Textures in van der Waals Heterostructures (iSpinText) WP2: Spintronics
Tailoring Spin-Orbit effects in Graphene for spin-orbitronic applications (Sograph) WP2: Spintronics
Tailoring spin-interactions in graphene nanoribbons for ballistic fully spin-polarized devices
(TAILSPIN)
WP2: Spintronics
2D functional MX2-graphenes (2Dfun) WP3: Enabling Materials
Graphitic films of group III nitrides and group II oxides: platform for fundamental studies and
applications (GRIFONE)
WP3: Enabling Materials
Characterization of Graphene immune-impacts through omics approaches and genotoxic
analysis (G-IMMUNOMICS)
WP4: Health and environment
Graphene-based optoelectrochemical sensor for the simultaneous monitoring of the
electrical and chemical activity of single cells (Graphtivity)
WP5, WP6: Biomedical
technologies, Sensors
Nanofluidics and Ultrafiltration with Track Etched Graphene-Polymer-Composite Membranes
(NU-TEGRAM)
WP6: Sensors
Graphene heterostructures with Nitrides for high frequency Electronics (GraNitE) WP7, WP3: Electronic devices,
Enabling Materials
Towards Ubiquitous GRAphene based RF COmmunications demonstrating and
understanding graphene based plasmonic THz antenna potential and limitations
(TUGRACO)
WP7, WP8: Electronic devices,
Photonics and Optoelectronics
High-performance and lightweight Graphene-CFRP compressed Hydrogen storage tank for
aerospace applications (GRMH2TANK)
WP13: Functional coatings &
foams
25. Associated Members
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 25
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Associated Members per Country
Associated Members per type of organisation
Company
Research
Organisation
University
27. Alignment of PPs with respect to TRLs
Partnering Projects
Bottom-up, basic/applied
ERC, FLAG-ERA, national
funding
Core Project WPs
Strategic research
EC FET funding
Innovation Partnering Projects
Technology transfer and innovation
SMEs, national, regional, EC,
private funding
Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs)
PP
PP
PP
Core 1
iPP
iPP
iPP
28. Examples of expected PPs
• EC-funded: PolyGraph and Gladiator, industrially oriented
• MS funded:
• Outcome of the recent JTC, 13 projects, mostly on very
low TRLs
• Other existing national projects, e.g. from GrafTech
(Poland), DFG Priority Program (Germany), or SIO-Grafen
(Sweden) programs
• In the future, we would like to see more applied PPs in line
with the overall evolution of the flagship
• Probably best to limit the number of PPs to a few dozen,
otherwise the benefits will get diluted and the system
becomes unmanageable
• New (trans-national) programs needed
29. Survey to Research Funding Organisations
Challenges
Need for more transparency and proactive sharing of data on public national research funding
and priorities in order devise a proper accounting system, monitor funding trends and prepare future
plans
Need for long term/strategic planning at the national level (priority programmes, centres of
excellence, infrastructures)
Data from 28 agencies
30. European Projects mapping-institutions
216 partners in EC collaborative projects are not part
of the GF consortium
• Graphene Flagship Core 1 partners
represent between 20-30 % of the
overall GRM research community
in Europe
32. Flagera 2
• BR1: Synthesis and characterization of 2D materials beyond graphene
• BR2: Large Scale Production of Heterostructures of 2D materials
• BR3: Vertical and lateral epitaxy of 2D materials for optoelectronics
• BR4: Functional ceramics incorporating GRM
• BR5: Inks for printing stable semiconducting thin films from 2Ds
• BR6: Modelling charge and heat transport in composites comprising 2D
materials
• BR7: Ecotoxicology of 2D materials
• BR8: Nanofluidics using graphene and other 2D materials
• BR9: Novel device concepts based on 2D materials for quantum
communication
• BR10: Beyond CMOS switches and new computing paradigms based on 2D
materials
32
33. • ARI1: In-situ and ex-situ quality control of graphene and other
2D materials
• ARI2: Controlling high doping in high quality large-area
graphene
• ARI3: Graphene in smart textiles
• ARI4: Functional coatings using graphene and other 2D
materials
• ARI5: 2D material for corrosion prevention and as lubricants
• ARI6: Graphene and 2D materials for thermal management
and thermoelectrics
• ARI7: Biorecognition of specific disease markers using
graphene
• ARI8: Highly selective gas sensors based on graphene and
other 2D materials
• ARI9: Cell bioelectronic technologies
33Spring 2017
35. Member countries National Information Points
Albania
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Associated Countries
Canada
South Africa
South Korea
Source:
36. Source:
CLUSTERS
CELTIC
PLUS
EURIPIDES2
CATRENE
ITEA 3
EUROGIA
2020
ACQUEAU
METALLURGY
Information technology
Manufacturing
Communication
Energy
Water technologies
EUREKA Clusters are strategic initiatives proposed and led by industry, developing
generic technologies of key importance for European competitiveness. Clusters facilitate
R&D and innovation projects on the basis of a broad industrial participation spanning
large industry and SMEs as well as research institutions and other public or private
organisations.
Research institutions can join Eureka clusters, participating in the proposals/projects as
subcontracted member.
37. Source:
Eureka clusters
Industry led
initiatives
• Medium term
• Strategically significant
• Coordination with
National Funding
bodies
Large number of
participants
• Major European
industries.
• Sector`s main actors.
• Large SME
participation (30–50%
of partners.
• Research organisations
and academia.
Fostering
European
competitiveness
• Develop generic
technologies and
standards
• Address economic and
societal challenges.
• The whole value chain.
Procedures
Eureka
• The cluster itself
carries out the
technical evaluation.
• Decentralised funding
(each country).
38. Eureka cluster on
Graphene and 2D-materials
MAIN R&D TOPICS // MAIN R&D RESEARCH AREAS
i. Standardization.
ii. Production (Scaling up)
iii. Applications:
i. Electronic devices.
ii. Biomedical applications.
iii. Energy (storage).
iv. Composites
i. Production and Manufacturing of composites.
SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGICAL IMPACT
i. “Technological push & pull approach”: taking advantage from existing knowledge
and also inspiring future scientific research.
ii. Elaboration of a value chain in chosen industrial sectors with market and commercial
capability.
41. Timeline - Phase 2
(October 2016 – May 2017)
*Internal meetings dates are tentative
Source:
Antonio Correia
Phantoms Foundation (Spain)
antonio@phantomsnet.net
42. MAT2015-70333-REDE
National initiative (NoE, Dec2015):
- Developing good praxis code for Industrial Partners
- Creating an Association of Interest -Asociacion Española de productores y
usuarios de Grafeno y otros 2D
- Traning of technicians and scientist in Tech. Institutes on 2D materials
- Creation of transversal action between spanish tecnological platforms (GRAFIP)
- Creative workshops with focus on
- Construction ( Barcelona)
- Energy ( Vitoria)
- ……..
- More info icmm_graphene@icmm.csic.es
44. - Initial Roadmap, written during the pilot
action (2013) and published last year
- Upgraded every two years ( Fraunhofer)
- Next due along 2016
- Topical meetings with main actors
- Strategic analysis on G related Industries
ROADMAP
54. Clear message from EU ...
Need to focus.....Deflaction starts at
Core 2
54
55. Input to focusing in Core 2
•Internal yearly pre-review of WPs
•Commission yearly review of the Core Project
•Technology and Innovation Roadmap produced by
the Core Project (technology push vs. market pull)
•Science and Technology Forum of the Core Project
(WP leaders and deputies, strategic advisory
council)
Description of a new Core Project
56. Identifying future priorities and gaps:
The current Graphene Flagship project has in place
mechanisms for identifying future needs and
priorities and identifying gaps by:
• Providing input on topics for the FLAG-ERA
Joint Transnational Call
• Identifying new Associated Members
• Publishing Expressions of Interest
57. Decision-Making Bodies
•General Assembly
• One representative for each partner of the consortium
•Executive Board
• Five Division Heads
• Ten members-at-large, elected by the General Assembly
• Director
• Science and Technology Officer
• Head of Innovation
•Management Panel
• Implements the decisions of the Executive Board and
formulates proposals in managing the project
19 October 2016 www.graphene-flagship.eu 57
Different technology areas have different technology readiness levels. The most mature areas are some production technques such as liquid phase exfoliation and some types of composites as those used in the tennis racket held by HM Carl Gustaf and Mr Leif Johansson, the chairman of the board or Ericsson and AstraZeneca. Certain types of sensors and energy applications are also quite mature as are touch screens. The areas that furthest to go are electronics applications and applications based on other layered materials. Some new areas such as medical technologies and nanofluidics are still in their infancy and it is hard to establish their TRL levels at this time.