Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
Trust Inequality
2016 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Informed Public
‣ 8 years in 20+ markets
‣ Represents 15% of total global population
‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; ...
Trust
Inequality
53
58
56 56
60
44
47
46 46
48
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
A Significant Divide
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. B...
Trust Index 2012 – 2016, percentage point change in the size of
the trust gap between Informed Public and Mass Population
...
A Global Phenomenon
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the instit...
50%
18 of 28 countries have a double-digit trust gap
between high-income and low-income respondents
Trust Index:
A Link to...
50%
55
46
19 21
28
48
41
45
42
47
44
57
46
50
46
63
52
49
58 55 55
51
69
62 64
73 73
79 81
87
47
37
15
20
24
31 31 33 33 3...
Thank You
View the full results at www.Edelman.com/trust2016
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Trust Inequality

7.089 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

This year witnessed a marked divide between the informed public and the mass population when it comes to trust in all institutions. This represents a split first witnessed in 2012 that has gained momentum and widened over time in 16 of 25 countries.

Read the full global results at www.edelman.com/trust2016

Veröffentlicht in: Business

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Trust Inequality

  1. 1. Trust Inequality 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer
  2. 2. Informed Public ‣ 8 years in 20+ markets ‣ Represents 15% of total global population ‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population ‣ 5 years in 25+ markets ‣ Ages 18+ ‣ 1,150 respondents per country Methodology 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country- specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). ‣ 16 years of data ‣ 33,000+ respondents total ‣ All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2015 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population ‣ All population not including Informed Public ‣ Represents 85% of total global population
  3. 3. Trust Inequality
  4. 4. 53 58 56 56 60 44 47 46 46 48 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A Significant Divide Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 25-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2016 Informed Public Mass Population 12pt Gap 9pt Gap in trust inequality-- which jumps to a 5-point increase among the GDP5 3-point increase
  5. 5. Trust Index 2012 – 2016, percentage point change in the size of the trust gap between Informed Public and Mass Population An Accelerating Disparity Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 25-country global total, 2012 vs 2016. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. Increased Gap Decreased Gap Gap has increased in 16 of 25 countries Global25 GDP5 France U.K. U.S. Spain Mexico Singapore S.Korea Malaysia India China Brazil Germany Australia Ireland Russia Poland Canada Japan Indonesia Italy Argentina UAE HongKong Netherlands 2012 Gap 9 7 4 7 11 1 8 6 6 4 13 8 7 6 14 8 2 7 8 3 10 13 6 13 10 14 15 2016 Gap 12 12 16 17 19 9 15 10 10 8 16 11 10 9 16 10 3 8 8 3 8 11 3 9 6 10 10 Sweden 3 5 12 10 8 8 7 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 -2 -2 -3 -4 -4 -4 -5
  6. 6. A Global Phenomenon Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 28-country global total. Trust Index, Informed Public vs. Mass Population, 15 countries with double-digit trust gaps in 2016 Country Informed Public Mass Population Gap U.S. 64 45 19 U.K. 57 40 17 France 55 39 16 India 78 62 16 Australia 63 47 16 Mexico 72 57 15 Italy 58 47 11 China 82 71 11 Brazil 58 48 10 Ireland 49 39 10 Netherlands 62 52 10 Sweden 46 36 10 S. Africa 54 44 10 S. Korea 50 40 10 Singapore 72 62 10
  7. 7. 50% 18 of 28 countries have a double-digit trust gap between high-income and low-income respondents Trust Index: A Link to Income Inequality Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q13. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total, lower vs. upper quartile income in each country. [“CEOs are fairly paid relative to the rest of the workforce”] GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. Average trust in institutions, respondents in top quartile of income vs. respondents in bottom quartile of income in each country, ranked by the size of the gap between them 60 57 71 64 78 78 68 49 52 62 67 49 45 46 50 53 40 74 79 46 65 68 59 38 44 80 55 62 58 71 46 42 40 35 52 56 48 30 33 45 50 32 31 32 37 40 27 62 69 36 56 59 51 30 37 73 48 55 52 66 Global GDP5 U.S. France Brazil India Netherlands Russia U.K. Italy Singapore Japan HongKong Turkey Sweden Spain Poland Colombia Mexico Ireland SouthAfrica UAE Argentina SouthKorea Germany Indonesia Australia Malaysia Canada China 19192022262931 Low-income respondents High-income respondents
  8. 8. 50% 55 46 19 21 28 48 41 45 42 47 44 57 46 50 46 63 52 49 58 55 55 51 69 62 64 73 73 79 81 87 47 37 15 20 24 31 31 33 33 34 34 36 36 37 39 45 46 47 49 49 49 57 64 64 65 69 70 74 81 83 Global GDP5 Japan France Germany U.K. Australia Italy S.Korea Netherlands Sweden Poland HongKong Canada Russia U.S. Singapore Turkey Ireland S.Africa Spain Malaysia Mexico Argentina Brazil China UAE Indonesia Colombia India In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population think they will be better off in five years Mass Population Less Optimistic Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed Public Mass Population 17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18
  9. 9. Thank You View the full results at www.Edelman.com/trust2016

×