Gene Profiling in Clinical Oncology - Slide 8 - G. Viale - Classic pathology: why is proliferation difficult to determine? Why is Ki-67 not a standard? What was decided at St. Gallen last week!
Similar to Gene Profiling in Clinical Oncology - Slide 8 - G. Viale - Classic pathology: why is proliferation difficult to determine? Why is Ki-67 not a standard? What was decided at St. Gallen last week!
Similar to Gene Profiling in Clinical Oncology - Slide 8 - G. Viale - Classic pathology: why is proliferation difficult to determine? Why is Ki-67 not a standard? What was decided at St. Gallen last week! (20)
Call Girls Kanakapura Road Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Gene Profiling in Clinical Oncology - Slide 8 - G. Viale - Classic pathology: why is proliferation difficult to determine? Why is Ki-67 not a standard? What was decided at St. Gallen last week!
1. How to count, what to count and why to count Ki-67 immunoreactive cells Beppe Viale IEO & UNIMI
4. Mitsubishi Ki-67 Hiryu (Peggy) Though classified as a medium bomber by the Japanese, by Western standards, the Ki-67 Peggy was seen as a light bomber
20. Chemotherapy in ER+ve HER2-ve Relative Indications for chemotherapy: any of Factors not useful in decision* Relative Indications for endocrine therapy alone Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 High proliferation Intermediate proliferation Low proliferation Lower ER and PgR level Higher ER and PgR level N 4+ N 1-3 Node negative Peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI) No PVI T size > 5cm T size >2 – 5 cm T size <= 2cm*** Patient preference to use all available treatments Patient preference to avoid side effects Multigene assays: High Intermediate Low score
21.
22. Intrinsic Subtypes Clinicopathological correlates (1) Intrinsic Subtype Clinico-pathologic definition Notes Luminal A ‘ Luminal A’ ER and/or PgR positive HER2 negative Ki-67 low (<14%)* Optimal cut point for Ki-67 labelling index was established by comparison with PAM50 intrinsic subtyping. Local quality control of Ki-67 staining is important. Luminal B** ‘ Luminal B (HER2 negative)’ ER and/or PgR positive HER2 negative Ki-67 high ‘ Luminal B (HER2 positive)’ ER and/or PgR positive Any Ki-67, HER2 over-expressed or amplified [5] Genes indicative of higher proliferation are poor prognostic markers in multiple genetic assays [7]. Useful to distinguish ‘luminal B HER2 positive’ as both endocrine and anti-HER2 therapy indicated
23. Intrinsic Subtypes Clinicopathological correlates (2) Intrinsic Subtype Clinico-pathologic definition Notes Erb-B2 overexpression ‘ HER2 positive (non luminal)’ HER2 over-expressed or amplified ER and PgR absent The majority of HER2 positive tumours are endocrine-receptor negative ‘ Basal-like’ ‘ Triple negative (ductal)’ ER and PgR absent HER2 negative Approximately 80% overlap between ‘triple negative’ and intrinsic ‘basal-like’ subtype Staining for basal keratins although shown to aid selection of true basal-like tumours, is not considered insufficiently reproducible for general use.
24.
25. ‘ Subtype’ Type of therapy Notes ‘ Luminal A’ Endocrine therapy alone Few require cytotoxics (e.g. high nodal status). ‘ Luminal B (HER2 negative)’ Cytotoxics + endocrine therapy Inclusion and type of cytotoxics may depend on perceived risk and patient preference. ‘ Luminal B (HER2 positive)’ Cytotoxics + anti-HER2 + endocrine therapy No data are available to support the omission of cytotoxics in this group. ‘ HER2 positive (non luminal)’ Cytotoxics + anti-HER2 ‘ Triple negative (ductal)’ Cytotoxics Consider DNA disrupting agents. ‘ Special histological types’* A. Endocrine responsive B. Endocrine non responsive Endocrine therapy Cytotoxics Medullary and adenoid cysctic carcinomas may not require any adjuvant cytotoxics).
26.
27. Work in progress: Fostering standardisation Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group Mitch Dowsett 1 , Torsten O Nielsen 2 , Roger A’Hern 3 , John Bartlett 4 , R Charles Coombes 5 , Jack Cuzick 6 , Matthew Ellis 7 , Lynn Henry 8 , Tracy Lively 9 , Lisa McShane 10 , Soon Paik 11 , Ljudmila Prudkin 12 , Meredith Regan 13 , Janine Salter 1 , Christos Sotiriou 14 , Ian Smith 15 , Giuseppe Viale 16 , Jo Anne Zujewski 17 , Daniel F Hayes 8 . Meeting in London, March 2010
BIG 1-98 is a large, international, randomized, double-blind Phase III trial Altogether 8101 patients were randomized to four arms between March 1998 and May 2003 This study is limited [point to oval around top 2 arms] to patients randomized to one of the two monotherapy arms, to receive letrozole or tamoxifen for 5 years.
Overall, pooling the two treatment arms, higher Ki-67 LI was confirmed to be a highly significant adverse prognostic factor for DFS in these patients, all of whom received some adjuvant endocrine therapy. The hazard of a disease-free survival event with higher Ki-67 LI was 1.8, corresponding to four-year DFS estimates of 86% versus 92% for high versus low Ki-67 LI. A significant difference was maintained in multivariate analyses allowing for other prognostic factors. Thus, Ki-67 LI is an independent prognostic factor in our hands.
Summary of approximate number of 'points' for each factor;
OK – how does composite risk interact with treatment – does it have predictive value? Tamoxifen alone deviates (solid red line) from others earlier in the risk spectrum. Finally [click to show red oval] separation among letrozole-containing treatments is apparent particularly at higher risk.