3. Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake
Oregon is a geologic mirror-image of Northern Japan. In both places, the Pacific Ocean
floor is sliding beneath the adjacent continents along giant faults called subduction
zones. (Graphic by Dan Coe, DOGAMI)
6. Tsunami Simulation at Cannon Beach
Elevation vs. Time
18
Depth (Location 2)
Depth (Location 4)
15
12
Depth (ft)
9
6
3
0
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Time (s)
Velocity vs. Time (+ inland)
15
10
Velocity (ft/s) (+ Inland)
5
0
-5
Velocity (Location 2)
-10
Velocity (Location 4)
-15
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Time (s)
(Source: DOGAMI SP 41, 2009) (Source: YouTube, Onagawa Tsuanmi)
7. Oregon Tsunami Vulnerabilities
City of Seaside with 83% of its population, 89% of its
employees and almost 100% its critical facilities in the tsunami
inundation zone (Source: Oregon Resilience Plan)
8. Minamisanriku
High Ground
Residential Residential
Neighborhood Neighborhood
EOC
Hospital
Police HQ
Department
Store
Multi-Family Housing &
Tsunami Vertical Evacuation Building
(Source: Oregon Resilience Plan)
24. US Tsunami National Standard
> Hawaii Tsunami Code
> FEMA P646 Tsunami Vertical Evacuation Building
(2008, 2012)
> ASCE Tsunami Loading and Effects Committee
Chaired by Gary Chock
> ASCE 7 Chapter 6 to be published in ASCE 7-16
2018
26. Design Performance Objectives
> Performance objective
• Immediate Occupancy for MCE (comparable or better
than hospitals)
• Little Residual deformations after EQ
• Current Code Design (with I =1.5) may not be adequate
(Thomas et al. 2012, 15WCEE)
27. Design Loads
> Dead Loads
Self Wt of Structure (beams, columns, slabs)
Cladding/Partitions
Mechanical/electrical/plumbing
Flooring/Roofing
> Live
Evacuation Zone (100psf)
• Non-Reducible
28. Design Loads
> Seismic Loads
0.6
0.4
Acceleration (g)
0.2
0 In Oxnard from 1994
-0.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Northridge EQ
-0.4
-0.6
Time (sec.)
0.4
N-S Acceleration (g)
0.2
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-0.2
-0.4
Time (sec.) In Ica from 2007 Peru
M8 EQ (105 km from
> Structural Verification epicenter)
29. Tsunami Effects
Elevation vs. Time
18
Depth (Location 2)
Depth (Location 4)
15
12
Depth (ft)
9
6
3
0
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Time (s)
Velocity vs. Time (+ inland)
15
10
Velocity (ft/s) (+ Inland)
5
0
-5
Velocity (Location 2)
-10
Velocity (Location 4)
-15
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Time (s)
30. Design Loads
> Tsunami Loads
Impulse Load
• Leading edge of wave
Hydrodynamic Load
• Drag on Columns
Impact Loads
• Impact of large objects
(log, car, or/and
container)
Damming Between Columns
Buoyancy Forces
32. TEB Structural Design
> Foundations
• Scouring Issue
• Piles to provide structural support
• Grade beams to interconnect pile caps
• Slab-on-grade tied to grade beams
(Source: Cannon Beach City Hall White Paper, 2009)
33. Tsunami Vertical Evacuation Refuge
Japan Proposed in Oregon
Japan
Under construction in Thailand
3/4/2013Yumei
35. Closing Thoughts
> Assess Tsunami hazard accurately
> Develop Tsunami Inundation Maps and Provide
Useful Engineering Parameters Relevant To
Structural Design and Assessment
> Sound Planning based on Response and
Recovery (schools, critical facilities)
> Build Vertical Evacuation Structures as
appropriate
> Education, Training, and Practice