The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
Porušovanie práv priemyselného vlastníctva
1. In Slovakia, my defence in the matter of industrial property rights infringement of various
protected designs of mine obviously finished without being successful, and so I addressed my
individual application to the ECHR in 2009.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8qQoIQf3hE8Y0hBNXJKVjdhUzg
And the fact that my application ended up in criminals’ hands is testified by the fraud that is visible
from the confirmation of declaration of admission.
2. - Though, if the declaration of admission of my application was confirmed by the genuine
European Court of Human Rights, this Court would not send its letter from Zürich, as it has its
seat in Strasbourg, and this Court would evidently state the date when this letter was sent on
its envelope.
- Neither would the genuine ECHR have any reason to change the name of one of the applicants
in its letter by replacing Ladislav by Ján.
- And the genuine ECHR would not delay the senseless proceeding in the matter for up to 3 years
just to be finished by a fraud.
- After all, a single judge had no competence to act in the matter of the application declared
being admitted by the Section IV of the Court.
3.
4. A similar situation occurred also in the case of my second application related to this international
organised crime applied on 28th
February 2013.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8qQoIQf3hE8U3VPMXlRUm9UcFE
In this application I requested the ECHR to decide in the matter of delays in judicial proceeding. In
such simple and firmly demonstrable conflicts like long-years delays in judicial proceedings, a
declaration of inadmissibility provokes more than just a suspicion of a fraud.
5.
6. I admit that such an action was completely incomprehensible to me. Indeed, just until I found
this material of the European Commission on the internet.
7. The information I have read on the website of the European Commission was indeed only a
logical continuation of something that began so successfully in 2004 in Netherlands, Denmark
and Belgium. But even in spite of it I was shocked by such a progressing tendency of human
rights infringement in the EU.