Want to learn how cities are reducing energy waste and becoming more sustainable? Take a look at these slides from an American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) webinar discussing the results of its 2017 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard.
The City Scorecard assesses 51 large US cities on local government efforts to increase energy efficiency. ACEEE scores cities by evaluating them in five areas: government operations, community initiatives, buildings, utilities, and transportation. We identify cities that excel and those that need improvement. We highlight actions they can take to do better.
Boston, New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Portland top the rankings of the 2017 edition, while Los Angeles, San Diego, Kansas City, and Phoenix are the most-improved since 2015. Here you can learn about cities' achievements, scoring trends, and best practices any community can pursue.
3. Webinar outline
• Overview of the City Scorecard
• Project goals
• Policy areas and methodology
• 2017 City Scorecard results
• Top overall cities
• Leading cities by policy areas
• Most-improved cities
• Scoring trends
• Cities are improving and making real progress…
• …but there is still room for improvement
• Additional resources
5. City Scorecard goals
1. Compare large US cities exclusively on efficiency –
creating friendly competition among cities to become
more efficient
2. Focus on policies to highlight important actions cities
can take – offering a roadmap for cities
5
8. Policy area & subcategories
Maximum
score
Local government operations 10
Local government energy efficiency-related goals 4.5
Procurement and construction policies 3
Asset management 2.5
Community-wide initiatives 12
Community-wide energy efficiency-related goals 7.5
District energy and combined heat and power 2
Urban heat island mitigation 2.5
Buildings policies 28
Building energy code stringency 8
Building energy code compliance 6
Requirements and incentives for efficient buildings 8
Benchmarking, rating, and transparency 6
Energy and water utilities 20
Electric efficiency spending and saving 6
Natural gas efficiency spending and saving 3
Low-income and multifamily programs 4
Energy data provision 2
Efficiency efforts in water services 5
Transportation policies 30
Sustainable transportation plan 4
Location efficiency 6
Mode shift 6
Transit 5
Efficient vehicles 3
Freight 3
Affordable housing in transit-oriented developments 3
Maximum total score 100
11. Boston earned 84.5 points, scoring 2.5 points more than last time.
Select city achievements
Buildings policies
• Massachusetts Stretch
Energy Code
• Building Energy Reporting
and Disclosure Ordinance
Energy and water utilities
• Renew Boston program to
promote utility energy
efficiency programs
• Utility investment in energy
efficiency programs,
including those reaching
underserved markets
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Local
government
operations
Community-wide
initiatives
Buildings policiesEnergy and water
utilities
Transportation
policies
Points
Maximum
points
Median score
Boston
http://aceee.org/sites/default/files/pdf/score-sheet/2017/boston.pdf
12. Leaders for Local
Government Operations
Denver (9/10 points)
• 2020 Sustainability
Goals
• Facility Condition and
Assessment Program
• Energy performance
contract for building
retrofits
Washington, DC (9/10
points)
• Sustainable DC Plan
• Green Building Act of
2006
• Clean Affordable Energy
Act of 2008
Leaders have set policies to increase efficiency in city government,
procurement, and asset management
13. Leaders for Community-wide
Initiatives
Austin (12/12 points)
• Goals for energy efficiency
and GHG emissions
• District energy systems in
redevelopment zones
• Community Tree Program
• Incentives for green
infrastructure
Minneapolis (12/12
points)
• Climate Action Plan
• District energy planning
• Urban heat island
mitigation goals
Leaders have city-wide efficiency-related goals, strategies to mitigate urban
heat islands, and policies or programs to plan for future efficient distributed
energy systems
14. Leaders for Buildings
Policies
Boston (26/28 points)
• Building energy code
compliance
• Building Energy
Reporting and
Disclosure Ordinance
• LEED building
requirements (Article 37)
Los Angeles (25.5/28
points)
• Existing Buildings Energy
and Water Efficiency
(EBEWE) Program
• LA PACE
• California Building Energy
Efficiency Standards
Leaders have adopted or advocated for stringent building energy codes,
devoted resources to building code compliance, and established requirements
and incentives for efficient buildings.
15. Leaders for Energy and
Water Utilities
Boston (20/20 points)
• Renew Boston
• Advocacy for energy
efficiency
• Energy data access
Seattle (17/20 points)
• Utility spending and
savings from energy
efficiency
• Efficiency programs for
underserved markets
• Water System Plan
Leaders have partnered with their utilities to encourage energy efficiency and
pursed programs to save water and energy at the same time. The efficiency
programs of utilities serving these cities offer high levels of savings and reach
underserved markets.
16. Leaders for Transportation
Policies
Portland (24.5/30 points)
• 2035 Transportation
System Plan/Climate
Action Plan
• Location efficiency in
zoning code
• Sustainable Freight
Strategy
New York City (24/30
points)
• NYC Transportation
Strategic Plan
• NYC’s zoning code
• R-10 Program
Leaders’ initiatives include location efficiency strategies, shifts to efficient modes of
transportation, transit investments, efficient vehicles and vehicle infrastructure, and
energy-efficient freight transport
17. Strategies for improving efficiency
• Adopt energy savings targets
• Lead by example by improving efficiency in local
government operations and facilities
• Actively manage energy performance, and enable
broader access to energy use information
• Adopt policies to improve efficiency in new and
existing buildings
• Partner with energy and water utilities to expand
access to efficiency programs
• Decrease transportation energy use through location-
efficient development and improved access to travel
modes
19. Most-improved cities
City 2017
rank
2017
score
Change in
score
Change
in rank
Select new programs
and initiatives
Los Angeles 4 76.5 +25 +8 Existing Buildings
Energy and Water
Efficiency Program
San Diego 13 59 +24 +14 Climate Action Plan
Kansas City 19 49 +14 +8 Energy Empowerment
Ordinance
Phoenix 14 57 +13 +4 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals
21. City scores are improving
Tier 2 median
score change:
+12 points
22. Cities have made real progress since
2015
• 8: Adopted benchmarking and transparency
policies/advanced policies on the books (Atlanta,
Denver, Los Angeles, Orlando, Portland, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and
Kansas City)
• 4: Adopted new community-wide energy savings
targets (New Orleans, Phoenix, Virginia Beach, San Diego)
• 3: Adopted vehicle miles traveled reductions
goals or GHG reduction targets (Boston, San Antonio,
San Diego)
• 75% of cities have bike share programs,
compared to 50% in 2015
26. Summary
• City Scorecard is a tool to benchmark the energy
efficiency efforts of cities and inform policymaking
• Findings indicate that cities continue to pursue
efficiency, with Boston, New York, and Seattle leading
the way
• Over 60% of cities improved their scores, and did so
by a wider margin than in the previous report
• Los Angeles, San Diego, Kansas City, and Phoenix are
most-improved
• However, cities can do more. The policy and program
data in the City Scorecard can help cities develop
next steps.
30. Local Energy Efficiency
Self-Scoring Tool
• User-oriented, spreadsheet tool for scoring any local gov’t on City Scorecard metrics
• Users may be included in ACEEE Local Policy Database
30aceee.org/local-policy/scoring-tool
31. Resources
• 2017 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard
(http://aceee.org/research-report/u1705)
• City and regional score sheets
(http://aceee.org/local-policy/city-scorecard)
• Local Policy Database
(http://database.aceee.org/)
• Local Energy Efficiency Self-Scoring Tool – being
updated (http://aceee.org/research-
report/u1511)